Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies
Transcript of Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies
![Page 1: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Energizing American Competitiveness
in Solar Technologies
SunShot Grand Challenge Summit and Technology Forum
Denver, CO
13 June 2012
![Page 2: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The United States is in a fierce race to be the inventor and manufacturer of clean energy technologies that can drive our future economic growth and national security.
The Department of Energy is identifying the most
critical grand challenges in clean energy technology.
Why do we want/need “Grand Challenges?”
Success will require Discovery, Invention, Innovation
...including innovation in technology, business models, finance and policy
![Page 3: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• We want to let the stakeholder community know what the DOE is doing and why we are doing it. • Identify key technical and non-technical challenges that need to be addressed. • We want feedback from the community.
![Page 4: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
So what is the SunShot Initiative?
SunShot
Initiative
5-6¢/kWh without subsidy
A 75% cost reduction by 2020
Pri
ce
![Page 5: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Costs of PV modules are dropping below the
power law experience curves Sources: (CdTe) First Solar Earnings Presentation, SEC Filings;
(c-Si) Navigant, Bloomberg NEF, NREL internal cost models
April 2012
Spot market
price = $0.83
2015
prediction
![Page 6: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
US PV Cell and Module Production
Sources: Navigant Consulting, Solar Services Program – 2011 Shipment Update, NPS-
Supply6 - April 2011, Report NPS - Supply4, Report NPS - Supply3
![Page 7: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Silicon Crystal Growth
Czochralski growth Directional solidification
![Page 8: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Casting Single Crystal Wafers
In 2007, the DOE supported research
of BP Solar in the U.S. to make large
single crystals of silicon using the
directional solidification method. A
prototype version of this technology
achieved 20% efficiency, better than
many CZ mono wafers in production.
Before the technology was taken to
the manufacturing scale, intense
competition with Chinese
manufacturers caused BP Solar to shut
down operations in the U.S.
This technology has been improved in China. Chinese companies may soon
go into production of single crystal silicon using directional solidification.
![Page 9: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
To compete in the clean energy race, inventing new technologies is not enough.
We have to make them to sell them world-wide and use them.
![Page 10: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Manufacturing
“Abandoning today's ‘commodity’
manufacturing can lock you out of
tomorrow's emerging industry.”
Andy Grove
co-founder and former
CEO, and author of
“Only the Paranoid Survive:
How to Exploit the Crisis
Points That Challenge Every
Company”
![Page 11: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
In every Crisis lies
the seed of Opportunity
Crisis
Danger Opportunity
wei ji
![Page 12: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union placed a 184 pound satellite, “Sputnik,” into orbit.
A view of Sputnik from Earth
![Page 13: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
14
President Kennedy (12 September 1962)
Embedded movie of moon shot speech
![Page 14: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
15
Meteorological
events (storms)
Hydrological
events (floods)
Climatological events
(extreme temp,
drought, forest fire)
Geological events
(earthquake, etc.)
The climate is changing ...
![Page 15: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
16
Comparison of measured precipitation extremes and
simulations of CO2 increase, volcanoes and other changes S.-Ki Min, X. Zhang, F.W. Zwiers & G. C. Hegerl, Nature 470, 378 (2011)
Observations
Highest single day rainfall Highest 5 day rainfalls
Climate simulations without carbon emissions
![Page 16: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Aug. 2003: European heat wave Temperature anomalies reached 10°C
52,000 Europeans died*
Country Fatalities
Italy 18,257
France 14,802
Germany 7,000
Spain 4,130
England & Wales
2,139
Portugal 2,099
Smaller countries
4,025
Total of above
52,452
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=3714
![Page 17: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
Inst
alled
Syst
em
Pri
ce (
$/W
DC
)
System Price
2010
Power
Electronics
Cost Reductions
BOS
Hardware Soft BOS
Efficiency
Improvements
Module
Manufacturing
$0.30
$0.27
$2.04
$0.59
$1.02
$5.71/W
$1.50/W
SunShot
Target
Reducing BOS Hardware Costs
Plug-and-Play
Solar Forecasting
High Penetration PV
BOS-X (Extreme BOS)
SEGIS-AC
Solar ABCs
Reducing Soft Costs
Rooftop Solar Challenge
BOS – Software
Instructor Training Network
Incubator for Soft Costs
Prize Competitions?
PV Made in the USA
PV Manufacturing Initiative
SUNPATH
F-PACE
PV Supply Chain
Regional Testing Centers
SunShot Incubator
Improving PV Efficiency
Next-Gen PV
F-PACE
SunShot Incubator
Low Cost Power Electronics
Solar ADEPT (ARPA-E)
SunShot Incubator
$0.42
$0.46
$2.69
$2.15 $0.12 $0.19
$0.65
$0.54
Residential SunShot 2020 Target
![Page 18: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
19
Cryst. Si : 19% 22% efficiency lower cost?
Poly-Si : 14% 16.5% ?
CdTe: 12% 14.5% ?
GaAs: 26% efficient low cost ?
Multiple Junction with solar concentrators,
CIGS, Gretzel ... ?
The Department of Energy is agnostic to any particular solar technologies:
What about Concentrated Solar Power?
![Page 19: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
SunShot CSP Pathway to 6¢/kWh
9¢
2¢
4¢
2¢
3¢
1¢
5¢
1¢
7¢
2¢
2¢
4¢
21¢/kWh
6¢/kWh
¢
5¢
10¢
15¢
20¢
25¢ Thermal Storage
Receiver/Heat Transfer
Power Plant
Solar Field
System Price
2010
Solar
Field
Power
Plant
Receiver/
Heat Transfer
Thermal
Storage
SunShot
Target
Cost Reductions
LC
OE
(¢
/kW
h)
Cost:
$200/m2
<$75/m2
Efficiency:
40%
>50%
w/dry
cooling
Temp:
560°C
>650°C
SunShot CSP FOA
(Oct 2011)
![Page 20: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
MICHAEL LIEBREICH, 25 APRIL 2012 TWITTER: @MLiebreich 21 / / / /
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
kWh/kW/year
More sun
RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY PRICE 2012, INSOLATION,
RESIDENTIAL PV LCOE 2012
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
kWh/kW/year
More sun$/kWh
Note: LCOE based on 6% weighted average cost of capital, 0.7%/year module degradation, 1%
capex as O&M annually. $3.01/W capex assumed for 2012
Spain
Germany
Italy
Denmark
France
Israel
United Kingdom
Russia
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
Canada
Mexico
Argentina
California
Texas
Hawaii
New Jersey
Brazil
North China
South
China
North India
South India
Japan
South Korea
Indonesia
Australia
0.00
0.40
EMEA ASOC AMER25GWPotential
residentialPV market
Source: Eurostat, grid operators, Bloomberg New Energy
Finance
Hawaii
(25¢/kWh)
![Page 21: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
MICHAEL LIEBREICH, 25 APRIL 2012 TWITTER: @MLiebreich 22 / / / /
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
kWh/kW/year
More sun
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
kWh/kW/year
More sun
Spain
Germany
Italy
Denmark
France
Israel
United Kingdom
Russia
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
Canada
Mexico
Argentina
California
Texas
Hawaii
New Jersey
Brazil
North China
South
China
North India
South India
Japan
South Korea
Indonesia
Australia
0.00
0.40
EMEA ASOC AMER25GWPotential
residentialPV market
RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY PRICE 2012, INSOLATION,
RESIDENTIAL PV LCOE 2014
$/kWh
Note: LCOE based on 6% weighted average cost of capital, 0.7%/year module degradation, 1%
capex as O&M annually. $2.51/W capex assumed for 2014
Sources: Eurostat, grid operators, Bloomberg New Energy
Finance
LCOE of utility-
scale PV is
~ $0.15/kWh
today in CA.
Hawaii
![Page 22: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
MICHAEL LIEBREICH, 25 APRIL 2012 TWITTER: @MLiebreich 23 / / / /
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
kWh/kW/year
More sun
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
kWh/kW/year
More sun
Spain
Germany
Italy
Denmark
France
Israel
United Kingdom
Russia
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
Canada
Mexico
Argentina
California
Texas
Hawaii
New Jersey
Brazil
North China
South
China
North India
South India
Japan
South Korea
Indonesia
Australia
0.00
0.40
EMEA ASOC AMER25GWPotential
residentialPV market
RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY PRICE 2012, INSOLATION,
RESIDENTIAL PV LCOE 2020
$/kWh
Note: LCOE based on 6% weighted average cost of capital, 0.7%/year module degradation, 1%
capex as O&M annually. $1.80/W capex assumed for 2020
Sources: Eurostat, grid operators, Bloomberg New Energy
Finance
New Jersey
SunShot goal
![Page 23: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
“The horse is here to stay, but the automobile is only a novelty — a fad.”
President of the Michigan Savings Bank to Horace Rackham, Henry Ford's lawyer.
Reaction to Alexander Graham Bell’s patent for the telephone by the Chief Engineer of the British Post Office:
Rackham ignored the advice, invested $5000 in Ford stock, and sold it for $12.5 million.
Predictions of Technology Naysayers
“The Americans have need of the telephone, but we do not. We have plenty of messenger boys.”
![Page 24: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
25
![Page 25: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
26
Exxon-Mobil estimate for electricity generation by 2030
Utility-scale solar will average 18¢/ kWh
![Page 26: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
27
Future targets (date varies by country) The U.S. target is 54.5 mpg by 2025
Sales of plug-in/electric are projected to be < 7% of the total new car market
![Page 27: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
28
By 2030, ExxonMobil expects that, on average, an
electric vehicle (like Nissan’s Leaf) will be $12,000
more than similar sized conventional vehicles.
Why are the projections for plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles so modest?
![Page 28: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
What is the potential market for clean
energy and energy efficiency technologies ?
Yogi Berra
“It's hard to make
predictions,
especially about
the future.”
![Page 29: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Goal: To innovate and develop next-generation CSP technologies for low-
cost collectors, high-temperature receivers and high-efficiency dry-
cooled power cycles to meet the aggressive technical targets of SunShot.
Investment: Up to $55 million over 3 years in 21 projects
at companies, universities and national laboratories.
See them in the Tech Forum!
SunShot CSP Funding and Selections
Collectors Receivers Power Cycles
![Page 30: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Incubator Supports Startups
![Page 31: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Multiple Incubator Rounds
32
Round 5
PV Incubator
Round 4
PV Incubator
Round 3
PV/Pre-Incubator
Round 2
PV Incubator
Round 1
PV Incubator
Round 6 SunShot
Incubator Soft Cost
Round 7 SunShot
Incubator
![Page 32: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Incubator Startups
Caelux
Renewable
Power
Conversion
![Page 33: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Crossing the Chasm
![Page 34: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
$-
$400
$800
$1,200
$1,600
$2,000
-12 0 12 24 36 48
Millio
ns
Incubator Round 1 Companies Only
Catalyzing Private Investment
Sources: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission public filings, Form D (2012); GE press release (2011)
Follow-on Private Investment
Months after Incubator Award Announcement
$17.5M DOE
Investment
![Page 35: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
SUNPATH Contract Duration
2 years
Max Contract Award ($)
$25M, 75% cost-share
Maximum Cost to DOE ($)
$50M
Objective
Domestic industrial scale manufacturing
demonstration of a PV technology:
• 15% lower in cost per watt compared to
the industry leader
• progressing significantly towards the
SunShot goal of $0.50/W modules
• >25 year lifetime and sufficiently high
efficiency for low balance of systems costs.
Replication and expansion of commercial
manufacturing in the U.S.
SUNPATH Goals and the SunShot Portfolio
SUNPATH
• New models for finance: OPIC-like structures Master Limited Partnerships
![Page 36: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
~$6.50
~$5.50
~$4.00
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
Residential Commercial Utility
PV
Syst
em
Pri
ce /
WD
C
2010 PV System Prices
BOS-non-hardware BOS-hardware Power electronics Module
“Even if you paid nothing for the hardware, you'd
still pay thousands of dollars to install a
residential solar power system” - Secretary Chu
Non-Hardware Costs: • Customer
Acquisition • Financing and
Contracting • Permitting,
Inspection, and Interconnection
• Installation and Performance
The Issue:
![Page 37: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Complicated and confusing process
Process is different for every locale
Unnecessarily high permit fees
In-person application submission
and inspection
Long wait times for inspection
and approval
But Why So Pricey?
![Page 38: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
One Hypothetical City’s Process…
... With an approval plan so complicated, the flow chart crashed my computer!
![Page 39: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
![Page 40: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
![Page 41: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Germany’s Success
Sign contract with installer
Register PV system with state energy
agency for FIT
(1 page, submitted online in 15 min.)
As long as housing structure is built
to code, no permits filed for
residential PV in Germany
![Page 42: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Rooftop Solar Challenge CA NJ
=
CA WI
La Mirada, CA Oceanside, CA
≠
≠
Uniform processes
The Problem
• 18,000+ local jurisdictions with different
PV permitting requirements
• 5,000+ utilities implementing
interconnection standards and net
metering programs
• 50 states developing interconnection
standards and net metering rules
The Solution
The Challenge invests in 22 teams
comprised of jurisdictions, utilities, and
local stakeholders to develop the same
requirements and processes across large
geographic areas (500,000+ population).
The Challenge also measures each team’s
progress to identify approaches that work.
![Page 43: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Residential PV in Germany costs ~$2.50/W Residential PV in the U.S. costs ~$6/W
Why should the installation of a PV system on your roof be handled like the installation of a gas water heater?
![Page 44: Energizing American Competitiveness in Solar Technologies](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042101/625670cf9dbd4d66915f1f05/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
“Unlike physics, where we can fundamentally figure out the
upper limit for the efficiency of solar cells, there is no such
limit to bureaucracy”
Soft Costs