End-host Perspectives on Congestion Management Murari Sridharan [email protected] CONEX BOF,...
-
Upload
chloe-moss -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of End-host Perspectives on Congestion Management Murari Sridharan [email protected] CONEX BOF,...
End-host Perspectives on Congestion Management
Murari [email protected] BOF, IETF 76, Hiroshima
Its all about the apps
• Apps have diverse needs– P2P, VoIP, TV, online apps, games
• Filling the pipe while being TCP fair• High-speed congestion control, Autotuning the receive
window, host OS (including app) bottlenecks
• Low priority scavenger service• Protocols changes to reduce latency• Multipath transport to maximize link capacity,
improve resiliency
End-host view of the network
• Mostly works as expected• Establishing connectivity is sometimes
problematic• Largely remains a black box– Congestion, bottleneck capacity is implicitly
inferred• Network seems change/risk averse• Imposes complex usage requirements– Volume caps, pay-per-use, metered data plans …
Network’s view of the end-hosts
• End-hosts cannot be trusted, need to be explicitly controlled
• Application performance needs can be inferred and improved upon by inspecting packets on the wire
• End-hosts typically establish connectivity to well-known servers
• And the reality is …
Splitting at the seams • Devices, Devices, Devices …
– IGDs/NATs/Firewalls/DPI devices/Load balancers/Soft switches• Layering violations, RFC non-conformance, no future proofing
– Backwards compatibility• Thanks to deep packet inspection you can’t even touch padding bits!
– Hampered ECN deployment• New protocols hard or impossible to deploy
– No changes to protocol on the wire– Takes time for apps to move to using new APIs
• Not all apps need TCP, but only TCP passes reliably E2E– Tunneling, feedback loops & TCP over TCP issues
• Network traffic management is a nightmare due to increased appetite for large volumes
CONEX: Things to consider• Let’s please stop inferring each other. – How can the end-host learn about network policy? – Explicit feedback to/from the network – OS has tons of context than the small amount reflected in
the packets• Wireless/Cellular network operators are moving
towards usage based models– Tactically, policy based routing/interface selection is the
high-order bit• How does the end-host learn about the network
policy?
CONEX: Things to consider
• Incremental deployment & incentives• Bottleneck is largely within the home and/or last mile– Congestion exposure doesn’t add any benefit but
shouldn’t make it worse• Primal-dual congestion control– Performance is a function of source rate controller, AQM,
marking thresholds, congestion measure– Measure of congestion, feedback of congestion measure,
and use of congestion measure by the source controller are all important.
• Beyond TCP – UDP(DCCP) + ECN