Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

52
encouraging students towards meaningful subjective comparisons Bradford Swanson July 27, 2013 - Murfreesboro, TN AES 50th Conference on Audio Education bradfordswanson.com

description

A review of Subjective Comparison techniques commonly used in audio research, and an introduction to methodologies used in the food/beverage industries. These formal research tactics can help inform our classroom comparisons, and encourage our students to make careful comparisons throughout their careers.

Transcript of Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

Page 1: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

encouraging students towards meaningful subjective comparisonsBradford SwansonJuly 27, 2013 - Murfreesboro, TNAES 50th Conference on Audio Education

bradfordswanson.com

Page 2: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

encouraging students TO:use their earsbeware of outside stimuliunderstand research methodsincorporate into daily practice

bradfordswanson.com

Page 3: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

outlineaudio research methodspractices in other disciplinessample comparison experienceaudio specific recommendations

bradfordswanson.com

Page 4: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjectivity research in audiocodecsup/downmixingmultichannel techniquesHRTF & spatial perception

bradfordswanson.com

Page 5: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjectivity research in audiographical representationscomparisons ratings

bradfordswanson.com

sound qualityspeech intelligibility

localization & envelopment

Page 6: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

audio research methods2:15 PM - CoE 164 - Paper #21“From Practice to Research and Back Again: Research Skills in Audio Engineering Education” Drs. Leffords & Berg

bradfordswanson.com

Page 7: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

audio research methodsITU-R BS.1116-1ITU-R BS.1534-1 ITU-R BS.1284-1semantic differential

bradfordswanson.com

Page 8: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

ITU-R BS.1116-1 (ABC/HR)

bradfordswanson.com

Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems

Three stimuliRated by impairmentSingle listen to eachReference Reference = one of the stimuli

Page 9: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

ITU-R BS.1534-1 (MUSHRA)

bradfordswanson.com

Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems

MUltiple Stimulus with Hidden Reference and Anchor

Three or more stimuliRated by sound qualityMultiple listensReference Reference = one of the stimuliAnchor = one of the stimuli

Page 10: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

ITU-R BS.1534-1 (MUSHRA)

bradfordswanson.com

Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems

MUltipleStimulus

and

Anchor

HiddenReference

Source: mushraJS

Page 11: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

ITU-R BS.1284-1 (general)

General Methods for the Subjective Assessment of Sound Quality

bradfordswanson.com

Single stimuli

Page 12: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

ITU-R BS.1284-1 (general)

General Methods for the Subjective Assessment of Sound Quality

bradfordswanson.com

Multiple stimuli

Page 13: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

semantic differential

bradfordswanson.com

Source: Marui, A., Martens, W. - “Timbre of nonlinear distortion effects: Perception beyond aptitude beyond “sharpness”?”

ratings along bipolar adjective scales

Page 14: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

semantic differential

bradfordswanson.com

9 stimuli randomized through all 12 adjective pairs

Stimuli One

Dark ---------------------- Bright

ratings along bipolar adjective scales

Page 15: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

semantic differential

bradfordswanson.com

Stimuli Eight

Dark ---------------------- Bright

9 stimuli randomized through all 12 adjective pairs

ratings along bipolar adjective scales

Page 16: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

semantic differential

bradfordswanson.com

Stimuli Eight

Sharp ---------------------- Dull

9 stimuli randomized through all 12 adjective pairs

ratings along bipolar adjective scales

Page 17: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

semantic differential

bradfordswanson.com

Source: Marui, A., Martens, W. - “Timbre of nonlinear distortion effects: Perception beyond aptitude beyond “sharpness”?”

9 stimuli assessed using all 12

adjective pairings

ratings along bipolar adjective scales

Page 18: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

practices in other disciplinesFormal Sensory Evaluation Psychological TendenciesCultural ConsiderationsCasual/Social Experiences

bradfordswanson.com

Page 19: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

sensory evaluation methodsAffective Tests

bradfordswanson.com

“Untrained” ParticipantsQuantative Suvery QuestionairreQualitative Interview or focus group Free response description

Page 20: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

sensory evaluation methodsDescriptive Analysis orAttribute Difference Tests

bradfordswanson.com

Highly trained participantsSensory lexicon of defined termsRating intensity or quality on a scale

Page 21: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

sensory evaluation methodsDiscrimination or Overall Difference Tests

bradfordswanson.com

Highly trained participantsThree Stimuli (two similar)Whether there is a difference and/or

How much of a difference there is

Page 22: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

sensory evaluation methodsDiscrimination or Overall Difference Tests

bradfordswanson.com

A - B - Awhich is the odd one out?

Page 23: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

sensory evaluation methodsDiscrimination or Overall Difference Tests

bradfordswanson.com

A (ref.) - A - B or

B (ref.) - A - B

which is most/least like the reference?

Page 24: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

sensory evaluation methodsDiscrimination or Overall Difference Tests

bradfordswanson.com

A (ref.) - A - B or

B (ref.) - A - B

how much difference is there between these samples?

Page 25: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

psychological tendenciesExpectation ErrorsSuggestion EffectsDistraction ErrorsStimulus/Logical ErrorsHalo Effects/Proximity ErrorsCarry-over, Order or Contrast Effects

bradfordswanson.com

Page 26: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

cultural considerationsPersonal PreferencesBackground ExperienceAccessibility

bradfordswanson.com

Page 27: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

sensory evaluation methodsExperimental Design

bradfordswanson.com

Identify test objectivesDetermine statistical analysis methodDefine the terminology usedProvide a controlConsider screening order

Page 28: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience15 examples Varying timbral qualitiesMark your perception

bradfordswanson.com

Page 29: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

SUBJECTIVE LISTENING EXPERIENCETest Objective

bradfordswanson.com

develop critical listening skillscompare timbral perception of equipment

Page 30: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

SUBJECTIVE LISTENING EXPERIENCEStatistical Analysis

bradfordswanson.com

Not collected - for personal use

Page 31: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

SUBJECTIVE LISTENING EXPERIENCEDefine the terminology

bradfordswanson.com

Timbe:Content = ContentPresentation = PresentationPitch = PitchLoudness = LoudnessSomething = Something

Page 32: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

SUBJECTIVE LISTENING EXPERIENCEDefine the terminology

bradfordswanson.com

Timbe:Harmonic Content or Frequency Spectrum

Page 33: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

SUBJECTIVE LISTENING EXPERIENCEDefine the terminology

bradfordswanson.com

Timbe:Content = ContentPresentation = PresentationPitch = PitchLoudness = LoudnessSomething = Something

Page 34: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

SUBJECTIVE LISTENING EXPERIENCEConsider Screening Order

bradfordswanson.com

?

Page 35: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience15 examples Varying timbral qualitiesMark your perception

bradfordswanson.com

Page 36: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience

bradfordswanson.com

“uncolored”or

natural reproduction of the harmonic content of this voice

Page 37: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience

bradfordswanson.com

“colored”or

significant deviations from the natural harmonic content of this voice

Page 38: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience

bradfordswanson.com

colored uncolored

l------l------l------l------l------l

Page 39: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience

bradfordswanson.com

what the heck was that?

Page 40: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

SUBJECTIVE LISTENING EXPERIENCEConsider Screening Order

bradfordswanson.com

RandomisationBalanced Test Design

*5 stimuli*each presented 3 times*in different orders

Page 41: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience

bradfordswanson.com

What the heck was that?Shakespeare’s 29th SonnetPerformed onceBob Kuhn (bkvoice.com)5 microphones - 3 times eachReferences included as stimuliSimilar signal flow

Page 42: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience

bradfordswanson.com

Colored referenceExamples 4, 8, and 15

Shure 55sw

Page 43: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience

bradfordswanson.com

Examples 3, 9, and 14

Beyer M-88

Page 44: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience

bradfordswanson.com

Examples 1, 7, and 10

Sennheiser MD-409

Page 45: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience

bradfordswanson.com

Examples 2, 6, and 12

AKG C-535

Page 46: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience

bradfordswanson.com

Uncolored referenceExamples 5, 11, and 13

DPA 4006

Page 47: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

subjective listening experience

bradfordswanson.com

1) MD-4092) C-5353) M-884) 55sw5) 40066) C-5357) MD-4098) 55sw

9) M-8810) MD-40911) 400612) C-53513) 400614) M-8815) 55sw

Page 48: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

Casual/Social experiences

“it’s a wine-tasting,

bradfordswanson.com

not a shootout” Tom Bates

Page 49: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

recommendationsExperimental Design

bradfordswanson.com

Define GoalsDefine VariablesMinimize Distractors

Page 50: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

recommendationsMatching non-variables

bradfordswanson.com

PerformancePresentationSignal PathGain

Page 51: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

recommendationsListening Experience Design

bradfordswanson.com

Listening EnvironmentsDouble-Blind TestingConduct a pilot sessionListen past the technology

Page 52: Encouraging Students Towards Meaningful Subjective Comparisons

bradfordswanson.com/mic