Energy and seismic performance of timber buildings ... - CNR
Enclosure Design for Mass Timber Buildings...Learning Objectives àReview building science...
59
1 of 63 Enclosure Design for Mass Timber Buildings COLIN SHANE M.ENG., P.ENG., P.E. PRINCIPAL, SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER RDH BUILDING SCIENCE INC. Disclaimer: This presentation was developed by a third party and is not funded by WoodWorks or the Softwood Lumber Board. OCTOBER 2018
Transcript of Enclosure Design for Mass Timber Buildings...Learning Objectives àReview building science...
1 of 63
Enclosure Design for Mass Timber Buildings
COLIN SHANE M.ENG., P.ENG., P.E.
PRINCIPAL, SENIOR PROJECT MANAGERRDH BUILDING SCIENCE INC.
Disclaimer: This presentation was developed by a third party and is not funded by WoodWorks or the Softwood Lumber Board.
OCTOBER 2018
This presentation is protected by US and International Copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, display and use of the presentation without written
permission of the speaker is prohibited.
© RDH Building Sciences Inc. 2015
Copyright Materials
“The Wood Products Council”is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems (AIA/CES), Provider #G516.
Credit(s) earned on completion of this course will be reported to AIA CES for AIA members. Certificates of Completion for both AIA members and non-AIA members are available upon request.
This course is registered with AIA CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product.__________________________________
Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation.
Course Description• Larger and taller mass timber buildings are becoming
common in North America. These buildings typically utilize cross-laminated timber or nail-laminated timber panels, glulam beams and columns, and new engineered timber components to meet the structural and fire requirements associated with greater heights. With these larger wood structures and heavier timber components comes the need for efficient building enclosure assemblies that can be installed quickly on tight sites and are in many cases new and unique to the industry. Prefabricated building enclosure elements are now also commonly used. This presentation shares guidance on building enclosure design and detailing best practices for mass timber buildings. It includes case studies and lessons learned from the design, construction, and monitoring of enclosures for recently completed projects.
Learning Objectives
à Review building science fundamentals and building enclosure design considerations for mass timber buildings.
à Discuss common details used for mass timber wall and roof enclosure assemblies.
à Highlight the potential for increased construction efficiency through the use of prefabricated enclosure assemblies.
à Referencing case studies and details from recently completed mass timber projects, demonstrate lessons learned and best practices associated with enclosure assemblies.
6 of 63
Presentation Outlineà Building enclosure design + mass timber
à What’s the same? What’s different?
à Lessons learnedà Case Study – Wood Innovation Design Centerà Case Study – Brock Commons
7
Building Enclosure Design
8
The Building Enclosure
Image Credit: MGA - Wood Innovation
Design CentreStructure
9
Taller Wood Building Structures
à Fast
à Sensitive to moisture
à Greater movement (shrinkage& drift)
à Fire code challenges
à Mixed steel, concrete& wood materials
à Is not the same as stick-built wood-frame and also different fromhigh-rise steel or concrete structures
10
Tall Wood Building Enclosures
à Need for Speed
à Erect and seal fast
à Protect wood structure
à Accommodating of inclement weather
à Ensure Durability
à Robust materials –high-rise appropriate
à Tolerant of movement
à Thermally efficient
à Non-combustible
11
Tall Versus Shorter Mass Timber Buildings
à Tall Wood Structuresà More repetitive, more exposed, difficult
access, need for more speed – ideal for prefabricated facades
à Less focus on roof and more on walls for weather protection
à Low to Mid-rise Wood Structuresà Easier access to walls from ground à Greater focus on roof for weather
protection than wallsà Prefabrication of façade also possible
though less economies of scale
12
Rain Control – Taller Buildings
à Increased height = increased rain deposition at upper floors and cumulative run-down at lower levels
à Water shedding features become more critical – continuity, drip edges, through-wall flashings etc.
à Need for more robust water penetration control strategy – good practice: drained & back-ventilated claddings
à Increased exposure to moisture during construction (severity & length of time)
13
Site Protection & Sequencing
14
Site Protection & Sequencing
15
Wall Design for Taller Wood Buildings
à Key Considerations:
Durability, Airtightness &
Thermal Efficiency
à Strategies:
à Drained / ventilated cladding
à Exterior or split-insulated with
thermally efficient cladding
attachments
à Note that CLT is vapor closed
à Non-combustible & moisture
tolerant cavity insulation
Screws through insulation over split insulated wall
Clip & rail cladding attachment system through exterior insulation
16
Roof Design for Larger Wood Buildings
Conventional roof with tapered insulation over wood joists
Protected membrane roof over vented & tapered structure over CLT
à Key Considerations: Keep dry,
allow to dry, robustness of
assemblies, sloping strategy
à Strategies:
à Protect wood roof from getting wet
during construction
à Design assembly with redundancy
for in-service drying
à Slope structure where possible
à Insulation on top - conventional or
protected membrane assemblies
17
Lessons Learned
18
Potential Challenges with Mass Timber Buildings
19
Lessons Learned - Roofs
à CLT/ NLT roofs get really wet when rained on and are very hard to dry out in-service and need expansion gaps
à Careful with selection of temporary waterproofingmembranes – assume it will be exposed roofing for a while. Need for water-tight laps/details
20
Lessons Learned - Roofs
à Protect large wood roofs from rain – but not too late
à Mechanical drying of wetted roofs is slow & causes costly construction delays
21
Lessons Learned - Roofs
à Design for the inevitable to keep roofing and project on schedule
à Design roof assemblies for redundancy and in-service drying where possible
22
Industry Lessons – Protection
5 ply CLT – ½ Untreated & ½ Treated with water repellant
End grain is very absorptive
Splits, checks & joints that allow water past top layer can be problematic
Erect & roof as fast as possible to protect from rain to avoid delays
Water repellants can help reduce uptake into wood
23
Case Study 1Wood Innovation and Design 6 Stories, 98’ Feet
24
Taller Wood Building Precedents
25
à 6 ‘tall’ levels (equivalent to 8 levels, 98’ tall)
à CLT shear walls, glulam columns with glulam beams and staggered CLT floor & roof structure
à Thermal performance design targets (effective R-values)
à R-40 roof
à R-25 walls
à R-5 wood curtainwall glazing
à Pre-fabricated design for infill walls and wood curtain wall
Wood Innovation Design Center
Michael Green Architecture (MGA) –Contractor: PCL Construction
26
WIDC – Structure & Enclosure Systems
Design & Architectural Renders: Michael Green Architecture (MGA)
27
Stick-Built Wood Veneer Curtainwall
à Aluminum veneer curtainwall
framing over LVL mullions
à Installed as individual window
units, ground bearing
à Stick built/site glazed with triple
glazed IGUs, argon filled, dual
low-e coatings
(U-0.15)
à R-5 (U-0.20) overall thermal
performance
28
Curtainwall to SIPs Interface
Aluminum CurtainwallVeneer Framing
Silicone Applied Liquid AB/WRB
Interior Air Seal at Joints
Silicone Transition Strip AB/WRB attached with silicone to curtainwall and wall membrane
LVL Framing Backup
SIPs
Charred fire-treated cedar cladding attached to plywood backup & cleat system over drained & ventilated cavity
29
Exterior Interface Details
30
Charred Fire-Treated Cedar Cladding Panels
John Boys, Nicola Log-works
31
Charred Fire-Treated Cedar Cladding Panels
32
Conventional Roof Assembly
33
Conventional Roof Assembly
34
Wood Innovation Design Center
35
WIDC – Building Enclosure Summary
à Durable and energy efficient
à High performance materials
and systems
à Small panel pre-fabrication
à Required full exterior access
during construction
à Scaffolding, exterior sealants,
transition details
à Appropriate for suburban site
and modest height
36
Case Study 2UBC Brock Commons 18 Storeys – 175 Feet
37
UBC Brock Commons – The Façade
38
Initial Concerns & Questions from Project Team
à Vancouver = Temperate rainforest
à How to protect mass timber from rain during construction in any season
à Giant tarps?
à Temporary roof lifted by crane?
à Waterproof the floors?
à Enclose as fast a possible?
à Enclosure must keep up with pace of structure
à How to enclose & seal the walls quickly and not be slowed by inclement weather?
39
UBC Brock Commons - Façade Design Criteria
Fast installation – 1 floor/day & water tight to
protect structure Thermally
Efficient, >R-16
effective walls
Inexpensive, <$50/sqftinstalled & finished
Installed without access to exterior –no sealing or
finishing
Pre-installed cladding & windows
Durable & High-
performance
Resistant to water & able to install in
rain
40
Precedents for Prefabrication of Tall Wood
41
Precedents for Prefabrication of Tall Wood
42
UBC Brock Commons- What Wasn’t Feasible
43
Unitized Curtain wall OptionProblem: Cost, Schedule, Energy
44
Small Panel Prefabrication Wall – PrecedentsProblem: Schedule
45
Tall Wood Prefabrication Option – Large Panel with Pre-installed Windows
46
UBC Brock Commons - The 4 Panel Contenders!
Pre-Cast Concrete Sandwich Panels Steel Stud Framed Panels
Wood Stud framed or CLT Panels Aluminum Window-wall
Not thermally efficient enough for project nor met the design intent, but
kept as contingency and costed
47
48
49
50
51
Laboratory Mockup & Physical Testing
52
Centura – Factory Floor Prefabrication
53
Site Installation – at Pace with Structure – 1 floors/day
54
55
56
57
Brock Commons – Building Enclosure Summary
58
Future Facades?
59
Discussion + Questions
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE VISIT
à www.rdh.com à www.buildingsciencelabs.com
à Colin Shane - [email protected]
