Enabling the Internet of Energy through Network Optimized ...
Transcript of Enabling the Internet of Energy through Network Optimized ...
Enabling the Internet of Energy through
Network Optimized Distributed Energy
Resources
Michael Kleinberg (DNV GL)
Mark Harral (GroupNIRE)
Ryan Wartena (Geli)
Network Optimized Distributed Energy Systems (NODES)
Annual Review Meeting
February 12th-13th, 2019
1
‣ Demonstrate an innovative Internet of Energy (IoEn) platform
– automated scheduling, aggregation, dispatch, and
performance validation of network optimized DER
‣ Develop a scalable approach for the fast registration and
automated dispatch of DER
‣ Simultaneously manage: 1) System level regulation (Category 2)
2) Local distribution support functions
3) Customer QoS
‣ Demonstrated and tested at Group NIRE’s utility-connected
microgrid test facility in Lubbock, Texas
Project Summary
Team
2
• Expertise in power systems
operations and control
• Industry accepted modeling
and simulation tools
• Independent testing and
performance evaluation
• Industry leading software to
integrate, network, and
economically operate
distributed energy systems
• Facilitating local and macro
operational decisions through
data method-driven
optimization
• Fully operational multi-MW,
dynamic renewables
integration and testing facility
• Distribution-connected
microgrid
• Home of ARPA-E CHARGES
energy storage testing
laboratory
Utility and Market Integration
3
GE, ABB
Topology
AMI/AMR
CIS
GIS
SCADA
EMS
DMS
OMS
DERMS
Utility Operations and Control Center
NODES DER
Aggregation
Platform
Market Operator
Bi-lateral Contracts
Other Aggregators
Smart Contracts
TCP/IP
Cloud
Distributed
Energy Assets
Utility and Market Integration
4
GE, ABB
Topology
AMI/AMR
CIS
GIS
SCADA
EMS
DMS
OMS
DERMS
Utility Operations and Control Center
NODES DER
Aggregation
Platform
Market Operator
Bi-lateral Contracts
Other Aggregators
Smart Contracts
TCP/IP
Cloud
Performance
Verification
Analytics
Utility Portal
Performance Reports
Distributed
Energy Assets
Project Summary
5
‣ Lightweight, portable micro-market server analytics for balancing
operational needs and DER availability
ISOs/RTOs
Utilities
Aggregators
Micro-Market Server
Customers
Communicate Spatial
& Temporal
Operational Needs
Communicate Spatial &
Temporal Availability
Dispatch
Validate
Customer QoS Performance Impact
6
Customer Type Peak Demand (kW)
Battery Energy Storage System
Power Rating (kW) Energy Capacity (kWh)
Stand-alone Retail 30 5 10
‣ Optimize customer net load for demand charge reduction (DCR)
– customer load profile
– tariff data
– installed DER/storage specification
‣ Co-optimize customer net load for DCR + GOS
‣ Compare obtained energy bill savings
– Difference provides the required incentive level for a customer to follow the GOS
Customer QoS Performance Impact
7
Base Case DCR Only DCR + GOS 1 DCR + GOS 2 DCR + GOS 3
Total Energy Consumption (kWh) 1,331.70 1,342.01 1,342.02 1,342.93 1,342.02
Peak Demand (kW) 29.94 27.54 28.31 27.54 29.37
Total Energy Charge $ 332.92 $ 335.50 $ 335.50 $ 335.73 $ 335.51
Peak Demand Charge $ 673.74 $ 619.57 $ 636.87 $ 619.57 $ 660.82
Non-coincident Demand Charge $ 658.76 $ 605.80 $ 622.72 $ 605.80 $ 646.14
Total Electric Charge $ 1,665.42 $ 1,560.87 $ 1,595.09 $ 1,561.10 $ 1,642.46
Savings compared to Base Case $ - $ 104.55 $ 70.33 $ 104.32 $ 22.96
Comparison of energy consumption, peak demand, cost, and savings for Customer 1
GOS used to characterize DR events Optimized net load for DCR/GOS
Distribution System Performance Impact
Assessment
8
Customer load profile creation
ES optimization in MGO
Distribution system
simulation in OpenDSS
Voltage and power
performance assessment
‣ % change in
peak load and
energy
consumption
‣ % changes in
minimum,
maximum, and
average voltages
‣ Residential and
commercial
customer load
profiles created
based on publicly
available building
data.
‣ Assumed that
5kW/10 kWh of
battery energy
storage (ES) is
installed at each
DER node.
‣ Optimize customer
net load with and
w/o GOS
‣ Distribution
system
simulations were
performed using
EPRI’s distribution
system solver,
OpenDSS.
Customer Net Load Profiles
9
‣ Customer net
load profiles
with optimized
energy storage
operation.
‣ Peak load day:
August 14th
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
08/13 00:00:00 08/14 00:00:00 08/15 00:00:00
Net
Lo
ad (
p.u
.)
Date/Time
Residential Net Load Profile
Base Case Test 1 with DCR Test 2 with DCR and GOS
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
08/13 00:00:00 08/14 00:00:00 08/15 00:00:00
Net
Lo
ad (
p.u
.)
Date/Time
Commercial Net Load Profile
Base Case Test 1 with DCR Test 2 with DCR and GOS
Distribution Circuit Parameters: R4-12-1
10
Base Case Test 1 Test 2
Total residential customer nodes 476 476 476
Residential customer nodes with DER 0 80 120
Total commercial customer nodes 113 113 113
Commercial customer nodes with DER 0 20 30
System peak load (kW) 5009 5009 5009
System peak load day August 14th August 14th August 14th
Amount of installed DER (kW) 0 500 750
DER level as a percentage of peak load 0% 10% 15%
Case Description
Base Case
Distribution QoS performance assessed for the system with the
corresponding residential and commercial net load profiles with
no DER operation.
Test 1 (with DCR)
Distribution QoS performance assessed for the system with the
corresponding residential and commercial net load profiles
where the DER operation is optimized for demand charge
reduction only.
Test 2 (with DCR and GOS)
Distribution QoS performance assessed for the system with the
corresponding residential and commercial net load profiles
where the DER operation is optimized for demand charge
reduction and a grid operating signal from the utility.
Base w/ DCRw/ DCR
+ GOS
w/
DCR
w/
DCR +
GOS
Base w/ DCRw/ DCR
+ GOS
10.0% 4460.96 4474.39 4443.71 0.30 -0.39 4.53 4.52 4.53
15.0% 4460.96 4477.34 4440.43 0.37 -0.46 4.53 4.52 4.53
DER Level
as a % of
Peak Load
Total Losses (kWh)% Change in
Total Losses% Distribution Loss
Distribution System Power Performance Metrics
11
‣ Improved performance on peak reduction and total losses when DER
optimize for DCR + GOS.
Base w/ DCRw/ DCR
+ GOS
w/
DCR
w/
DCR +
GOS
Base w/ DCRw/ DCR
+ GOS
w/
DCR
w/
DCR +
GOS
10.0% 98433.28 98963.80 98161.46 0.54 -0.28 5009.35 4949.61 4946.85 -1.19 -1.25
15.0% 98433.28 99065.00 98109.69 0.64 -0.33 5009.35 4938.31 4934.53 -1.42 -1.49
DER Level
as a % of
Peak Load
% Change in
EnergyEnergy Consumed (kWh) Peak Demand (kW)
% Change in
Peak Demand
Base w/ DCRw/ DCR
+ GOS
w/
DCR
w/
DCR +
GOS
Base w/ DCRw/ DCR
+ GOS
w/
DCR
w/
DCR +
GOS
10.0% 98433.28 98963.80 98161.46 0.54 -0.28 5009.35 4949.61 4946.85 -1.19 -1.25
15.0% 98433.28 99065.00 98109.69 0.64 -0.33 5009.35 4938.31 4934.53 -1.42 -1.49
DER Level
as a % of
Peak Load
% Change in
EnergyEnergy Consumed (kWh) Peak Demand (kW)
% Change in
Peak Demand
Base w/ DCRw/ DCR
+ GOS
w/
DCR
w/
DCR +
GOS
10.0% 1.04 1.04 1.04 -0.08 -0.08
15.0% 1.04 1.04 1.04 -0.06 -0.06
Maximum Voltage (p.u.)% Vmax
ChangeDER Level
as a % of
Peak Load
Base w/ DCRw/ DCR
+ GOS
w/
DCR
w/
DCR +
GOS
Base w/ DCRw/ DCR
+ GOS
w/
DCR
w/
DCR +
GOS
10.0% 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.02 0.02 0.98 0.98 0.98 -0.02 0.01
15.0% 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.04 0.04 0.98 0.98 0.98 -0.02 0.01
Minimum Voltage (p.u.)% Vmin
ChangeAverage Voltage (p.u.)
% Vavg
ChangeDER Level
as a % of
Peak Load
Distribution System Voltage Performance Metrics
12
‣ Impact on voltage negligible.
Distribution System Voltage Performance Impact
(Sample)
13
‣ Voltages on all phases on peak load day for 10% DER
‣ The voltages for Test 1 and Test 2 are sufficiently close to those of the base case
throughout each 24-hour period.
‣ DER operations serve to reduce the net load and demand charges with negligible impact
on the baseline voltage characteristics.
Group NIRE - Testbed
14
‣ Current Generation Assets– $30M installed research equipment
– partners include Alstom, GE, Gamesa, Younicos, State of Texas, SPEC
‣ Distribution System– $1.5M in distribution system
upgrades;
– 30MW Peak Distribution Load
– 10MW Off-Peak Distribution Load
‣ NODES Expansion– Energy Vehicle Chargers;
– Electric Vehicle;
– Roof Top Solar;
– Residential Wind Turbines;
– Web Relay-Controlled Breakers
– Electric Pumps;
– Residential Battery;
Solar and Solar+Storage
15
Rooftop PV
SunSpark Panels – 9 kW
Canadian Solar Panels – 9 kW
Outback Solar+Storage – Lead-acid AGM Batteries
Lithium-ion Battery Systems
16
SolarEdge StorEdge Inverter +
LG RESU10H Lithium Ion
Battery
Nissan Leaf EV
SMA Sunny Island Inverter +
LG RESU6.5 Li-Ion Battery
Controllable Loads
17
Hydroponic Grow Stations – 7 kW
Belkin WeMo Insight
Smart Plug
Electro Industries Shark Meters
Third-Party Performance Validation with Veracity
18
Other data
providers (e.g. MET, sensor
data)
OEMs
Owner/
operators
Assurance
providers and
class societies (e.g. DNV GL)
Analytics and
software
providers
Provider or consumer
development team(OEMs, asset owners, regulators)
Assurance
providers and
class societies
OEMs
Owner/
operators
Regulators
Insurance
companies
Data providers: End consumers:
Analytics service
providers:
Other end consumers
Providers’ toolbox
Marketplace
VERACITY – MULTI-SIDED OPEN PLATFORM
Asset owners’ data container
Qu
ality
Assessm
en
t
Cloud Storage and Analytics Platform
‣ Veracity by DNV GL
– The Veracity industry data platform is designed to help companies improve data quality, manage data ownership and access control, maintain data security, and access analytical tools or other standalone digital services
‣ The NODES team has been exploring the use of this platform to automate our performance evaluation methodology and provide additional pathways to commercialization and adoption of DER aggregation platforms.
‣ https://www.veracity.com/
19
Validation Platform
20
Remote data acquisition
Host data on cloud storage
platform
Automated analytics
Visualization of data and
performance metrics
Validation Platform
‣ Data input – Remote acquisition of data from Geli GENI API and storage in Veracity Data Containers
‣ Analytics – Analyses of time series data hosted on Veracity, implemented through web-based solutions such as Data Science Virtual Machines
– Category 2 performance validation analytics
– Distribution analytics
– Market analytics
‣ Visualization and reporting
– Visualization through Veracity Power BI framework, that enables sharing of reports with external parties
– Utilities and stakeholders will be ale to login securely to access these results
21
‣ DERs: Wemo devices and Battery
DER Response Visualization
22
DER Response Metrics
23
DER Response Metrics (subset)
24
Geli Internet of Energy Platform
Analyze & Design Connect & Automate Manage & Aggregate
Geli ESyst Geli EOS Geli GENI
Geli Global Energy Network Interface
26
1
2
3
4 5
10
11
12
13
14, 15
16
17, 18
19
20, 21
22
23, 24
25
26
27
MicroMarket
Broker
Server is
Activated
1-3
15-19
4-10
20-2711-13
Power
Profile is
Requested
Energy
Accounts
Forward
Availability
Profiles are
Bid
Utility,
Market, or
Aggregator
Energy
Transactions
are Computed
Energy
Asset
Owners &
Operators
MicroContracts
are Created &
Authorized
Each Energy Asset
Performs Contracted
Operation
Total Power Profile is
Delivered from Contracted
Aggregated Assets
MicroContracts are
Validated &
Executed
Request & Offers from
Nodes Sent to
MicroMarket Server
MicroMarket Server
Calculates Economic
Dispatch & Notifies Nodes
Energy Assets Operated &
Validated according to
MicroContracts
Energy
Assets
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
6 7
8 9
Automating Energy Transactions with Network Optimized Distributed Energy Resources
Geli Energy Operating System Scalability
Multi-site Optimization
Site 1
Site 2
Site N
Optimized by
Geli Engine
@Geli GENI
Geli GENI API or other protocol SEP2.0, Open ADR, AGC, ICCP, DNP3
Geli Energy Server for
Utility, Retailers,
Aggregators, & Brokers
- Demand Response
- Capacity
- Frequency regulation
Geli
Energy
Server
Geli Energy Server Architecture
29
Geli
GENI
API
Ge
li G
EN
I
AP
IGeli
Energy
Server
Coordinating (Optimizers)
Frequently (Enough)
with (Lots of) Forecasting
What are we doing?
Current Multi-Node, Multi-Site
Forecasting Energy Storage
‣ #1, A site load is forecasted with Nearest Neighbor
forecasting methods
‣ 5-6x Power Variations lead to large (>100%+/-) local error of
‘knn forecasting’, but maintains good daily trending
Forecasting Loads
‣ #3, A switch load is forecasted with Nearest Neighbor forecasting methods
‣ Low Power Variations lead to small local error of Back-casting with Pattern
Matching and maintains good daily trending
‣ Error rates are <+/-1% for 12 hours and then increase to +3%
Geli Aggregation Groups, Lists, & Scheduling
Automated & Dynamic Allocations
10 DERs for 7 Days with 13 Aggregation Requests
10 DERs for 7 Days with 13 Aggregation Requests
Geli VPP Performance
Towards 50 DERs Aggregated in Lists & Sites
37 DERs Aggregated in Lists & Sites
Geli VPP for BTM & Market Energy Apps
40
• Residential
– Solar Self Consumption
– Time of Use Bill Optimization
– Day Ahead Energy
– Frequency Response
• Commercial
– Peak Shave Demand
– Day Ahead Energy
– Frequency Response
List of Achievements
41
‣ Magazine Articles:
– Greentech Media - Geli’s ‘Internet of Energy’ Software Gets Real-World Test in Texas Microgrid, January 28, 2016.
– Microgrid Knowledge - How to Juggle 100 Distributed Energy Resources on a Microgrid, April 8th, 2016.
– RTO Insider, New York Sees Storage in Retail and Wholesale Markets, Aug 7, 2017
‣ Conference Panels:
– Infocast Microgrid Convergence - San Mateo, CA, October 25-26, The Role for Blockchain Technologies in Microgrids & Smart Cities.
– GridNEXT 2016 (TREIA Annual Conference) - November 9-11, Georgetown, TX. - Enabling the Internet of Energy through Network Optimized Distributed Energy.
– Transactive Energy: Bringing The Maximal Vision Of A Customer-Centric Grid 2.0 Into Focus, Mountain View, CA, Feb 21, 2017.
– NY Energy REVolution Summit, Integrating Energy Storage, August 1-3, 2017, New York, NY
– CAISO Stakeholder Symposium, Invited Speaker, How Can Power Technologies Help Unlock the Renewable Energy Dividend, Sacramento CA, October 18, 2018
– Outside Energy, DNVGL Podcast on Internet of Energy New Business Models, Oct. 2017
– US-China New Energy Economic Forum, Energy Storage-as-a-Service & the Digital Energy Retailer, Santa Clara CA, Nov 18, 2018
– Denki Shimbun (The Electric Daily News) & Japanese Utility Delegation presentation on Internet of Energy Technology for New Energy Markets, Feb. 2018
– Storage Week Conference, Software For Energy Storage, San Francisco, CA Feb. 13, 2018
– MISO Market Symposium, Indianapolis, IN, Aug. 2018
– The Battery Show, Novi. MI, Sept. 2018.
‣ Webinars:
– TREIA Webinar Series - Enabling the Internet of Energy through Network Optimized Distributed Energy, June 28th, 2016.
– Stanton Report, Unpacked the DER Tech Stack, Aug 28, 2017
Technology to Market
42
VPP Growth Plan
43
Plan Implement Integrate Operate Asses
‣ DER potential studies
‣ DER hosting capacity of current distribution grid in targeted areas.
‣ Estimate customer, distribution, and full system benefits of reduced demand in
targeted areas and time periods.
‣ Financial models and investment pro forma to support rate-based DER
deployments.
VPP Growth Plan
44
Plan Implement Integrate Operate Asses
‣ Customer outreach and marketing programs
‣ Recruitment, training, and oversight of local installation
contractors
‣ Provision of measure design and installation quality
control.
‣ Management of incentive processing and disbursements.
VPP Growth Plan
45
Plan Implement Integrate Operate Asses
‣ Utility/ISO backend integration and operator
training
‣ Asset networking & integration
‣ Integration for VPP Growth Program Pilot lays
groundwork for large-scale DER deployments
Distribution System Performance Impact
Assessment
46
Plan Implement Integrate Operate Asses
‣ Pilot Geli Internet of Energy platform
for VPP Networks of 50-1000-
10,000+ DERs where Utility & retail
partners provide or arrange
distributed assets at residential,
commercial, & utility-scale sites
‣ Bring-Your-Own energy assets have
a significantly lower cost of assets
‣ Can be used to diversify an
aggregation portfolio, groupings, and
sub-groupings
VPP Growth Plan
47
Plan Implement Integrate Operate Asses
‣ Performance assessment of DER fleet to system
requirements
‣ Automated DER and VPP performance
assessments via DNV GL’s Veracity platform