Part two: Conceptualize Information Systems from various Perspectives.
Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data...
-
Upload
blanche-harrison -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data...
![Page 1: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Empirical Modeling Process
1 - Identify Problem / Question2 - Conceptualize model3 - Collect data4 - Examine and Summarize data5 - Estimate model6 - Examine model performance7 - Revise model as needed
![Page 3: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Demand Curve
Price
Quantity
![Page 4: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Price:
Deflated Constant Dollar Price
Quantity:
Per Capita Consumption
![Page 5: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Mathematical Conceptual Model:
Model 1TP = b0+ b1TQ + e
Where:TP= real quarterly retail turkey
price (cents/lb.)TQ=quarterly per capita turkey
consumption (lbs./capita)b0, b1 are parameters to be estimatede is an error term
![Page 6: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Turkey Demand Curve
TP
TQ
b0
b1
TP = b0+ b1TQ
![Page 7: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Objective:
To quantify determinants of quarterly retail price of Turkey over 1980-2008
Estimate the demand curve
![Page 8: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Empirical Modeling Process
1 - Identify Problem / Question2 - Conceptualize model3 - Collect data4 - Examine and Summarize data5 - Estimate model6 - Examine model performance7 - Revise model as needed
![Page 9: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Nominal Quarterly Retail Turkey Prices, 1980-2008
80.0
85.0
90.0
95.0
100.0
105.0
110.0
115.0
120.0
80.1 82.1 84.1 86.1 88.1 90.1 92.1 94.1 96.1 98.1 00.1 02.1 04.1 06.1 08.1
Date (Year.Quarter)
Pri
ce (
cen
ts/l
b.)
![Page 10: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Quarterly Per Capita Turkey Consumption, 1980-2008
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
80.1 82.1 84.1 86.1 88.1 90.1 92.1 94.1 96.1 98.1 00.1 02.1 04.1 06.1 08.1
Date (Year.Quarter)
Co
nsu
mp
tio
n (
lbs.
/cap
ita)
![Page 11: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Quarterly Nominal Retail Turkey Price vs. Per Capita Consumption, 1980-2008
80.0
85.0
90.0
95.0
100.0
105.0
110.0
115.0
120.0
125.0
80.1 82.1 84.1 86.1 88.1 90.1 92.1 94.1 96.1 98.1 00.1 02.1 04.1 06.1 08.1
Date (Year.Quarter)
Pri
ce (
cen
ts/lb
.)
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
Co
nsu
mp
t. (
lbs.
/cap
ita)
Turkey Price
Turkey Consumption
![Page 12: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Real Quarterly Retail Turkey Prices, 1980-2008
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
220.0
240.0
80.1 82.1 84.1 86.1 88.1 90.1 92.1 94.1 96.1 98.1 00.1 02.1 04.1 06.1 08.1
Date (Year.Quarter)
Pri
ce (
cen
ts/lb
., 20
06.3
do
llars
) .
![Page 13: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Quarterly Real Retail Turkey Price vs. Per Capita Consumption, 1980-2008
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
220.0
240.0
80.1 82.1 84.1 86.1 88.1 90.1 92.1 94.1 96.1 98.1 00.1 02.1 04.1 06.1 08.1
Date (Year.Quarter)
Pri
ce (
cen
ts/lb
., 20
08.3
$)
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
Co
nsu
mp
t. (
lbs.
/cap
ita)
Turkey Price
Turkey Consumption
![Page 14: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Real Turkey Price vs. Turkey Consumption Scatter Plot, Quarterly Data, 1980-2008
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
220.0
240.0
260.0
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
Consumption (lbs./capita)
Pri
ce (
cen
ts/lb
.)
![Page 15: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Empirical Modeling Process
1 - Identify Problem / Question2 - Conceptualize model3 - Collect data4 - Examine and Summarize data5 - Estimate model6 - Examine model performance7 - Revise model as needed
![Page 16: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Summary Statistics of Quarterly Real Turkey Price and Per Capita Turkey Consumption, 1980-2008
Turkey Turkey Summary Statistics Price Quantity
(cents/lb.) (lbs./capita)Average 157.1 3.9Minimum 109.6 1.6Maximum 238.5 6.5Median 144.1 3.9Standard Deviation 35.8 1.2Coefficient of Variation 22.8% 30.3%
![Page 17: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Model 1TP = b0 + b1*TQ
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression StatisticsMultiple R 0.58R Square 0.33Adjusted R Square 0.33Standard Error 29.35Observations 116
ANOVAdf SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 49082.453 49082.453 56.963 1.18055E-11Residual 114 98227.962 861.649Total 115 147310.415
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Intercept 227.48 9.71 23.42 0.00 208.24 246.72TQ -17.81 2.36 -7.55 0.00 -22.49 -13.14
![Page 18: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Goodness of Fit Measures
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression StatisticsMultiple R 0.58R Square 0.33Adjusted R Square 0.33Standard Error 29.35Observations 116
![Page 19: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Residual Summary
ANOVAdf SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 49082.453 49082.453 56.963 1.18055E-11Residual 114 98227.962 861.649Total 115 147310.415
![Page 20: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Parameter Estimates
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Intercept 227.48 9.71 23.42 0.00 208.24 246.72TQ -17.81 2.36 -7.55 0.00 -22.49 -13.14
![Page 21: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Model 1 Regression Estimates:
TP = 227.48 – 17.81 TQ (0.00) (0.00) p-values
Adj. R-Sq.=0.33 RMSE=29.35 cents/lb.
Observations=116
![Page 22: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Turkey Demand Curve
TP
TQ
227.48
-17.81
TP = 227.48 – 17.81 TQ
![Page 23: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Real Turkey Price vs. Turkey Consumption Scatter Plot, Quarterly Data, 1980-2008
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
220.0
240.0
260.0
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
Consumption (lbs./capita)
Pri
ce (
cen
ts/lb
.)
![Page 24: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Diagnostic Testing of Regression
1. Predicted vs. Actual Graph
2. Graphical analysis of residuals
![Page 25: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Predicted TP = 227.48 – 17.81 TQResidual = TP – Predicted TP
Predicted Values & Residuals (Errors)
Model 1Actual Predicted Model 1
TP TP ErrorYear.Qtr (cents/lb) (cents/lb) (cents/lb)
80.1 237.8 195.55 42.27218.5 192.66 25.89223.6 181.75 41.80238.5 157.38 81.10
81.1 238.1 198.67 39.40233.2 193.55 39.60234.5 183.13 51.33210.8 146.37 64.43
82.1 207.5 196.49 11.02201.7 191.21 10.53207.5 181.50 25.98201.3 152.52 48.73
83.1 200.0 191.16 8.85199.0 188.89 10.14194.7 183.65 11.01191.2 149.87 41.37
84.1 196.3 193.34 3.01199.7 189.04 10.64206.8 181.36 25.40207.1 149.61 57.53
![Page 26: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Model 1: Actual and Predicted Real Quarterly Retail Turkey Prices, 1980-2008
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
220.0
240.0
80.1 82.1 84.1 86.1 88.1 90.1 92.1 94.1 96.1 98.1 00.1 02.1 04.1 06.1 08.1
Date (Year.Quarter)
Rea
l Pri
ce (
cen
ts/lb
.)
Actual
Predicted
![Page 27: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Model 1: Residuals (Actual minus Predicted) for Predicting
Real Quarterly Retail Turkey Prices, 1980-2008
-60.00
-40.00
-20.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
80.1 82.1 84.1 86.1 88.1 90.1 92.1 94.1 96.1 98.1 00.1 02.1 04.1 06.1 08.1
Date (Year.Quarter)
Err
or
(cen
ts/lb
.)
![Page 28: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Performance Summary Model 1
•Adj. R-square only 0.33•RMSE = 29.35 cents/lb (std dev TP=35.8)•Sign on coefficient is as expected•TQ is statistically significant• Not predicting well• We suspect we have left out some relevant important factors
(omitted relevant variable problem)
![Page 29: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Empirical Modeling Process
1 - Identify Problem / Question2 - Conceptualize model3 - Collect data4 - Examine and Summarize data5 - Estimate model6 - Examine model performance7 - Revise model as needed
![Page 30: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Mathematical Conceptual Model
Model 2TP = b0 + b1TQ + b2BfQ + b3PkQ
+ b4ChQ + b5INC + e
Where:TP and TQ are as defined in model 1,BfQ, PkQ, ChQ quarterly beef, pork and chicken consumption (lbs./capita)INC = real disposable income ($/capita)
![Page 31: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Mathematical Conceptual Model
Model 2TP = b0 + b1TQ + b2BfQ + b3PkQ
+ b4ChQ + b5INC + e
Sign Expectations:b1
b2
b3
b4
b5
![Page 32: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Real Turkey Price vs. Turkey Consumption Scatter Plot, Quarterly Data, 1980-2008
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
220.0
240.0
260.0
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
Consumption (lbs./capita)
Pri
ce (
cen
ts/lb
.)
![Page 33: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Real Turkey Price vs. Beef Consumption Scatter Plot, Quarterly Data, 1980-2008
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
220.0
240.0
260.0
14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0
Beef Consumption (lbs./capita)
Tu
rkey
Pri
ce (
cen
ts/lb
.)
![Page 34: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Real Turkey Price vs. Pork Consumption Scatter Plot, Quarterly Data, 1980-2008
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
220.0
240.0
260.0
11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5
Pork Consumption (lbs./capita)
Tu
rkey
Pri
ce (
cen
ts/lb
.)
![Page 35: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Real Turkey Price vs. Chicken Consumption Scatter Plot, Quarterly Data, 1980-2008
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
220.0
240.0
260.0
11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0 23.0 25.0
Pork Consumption (lbs./capita)
Tu
rkey
Pri
ce (
cen
ts/lb
.)
![Page 36: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Real Turkey Price vs. Real Income Scatter Plot, Quarterly Data, 1980-2008
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
220.0
240.0
260.0
20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000
Income ($/capita)
Tu
rkey
Pri
ce (
cen
ts/lb
.)
![Page 37: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Summary Statistics of Data Used to Explain Quarterly Real Turkey Price, 1980-2008
Turkey Turkey Beef Pork Chicken RealSummary Statistics Price Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Income
(cents/lb.) (lbs./capita) (lbs./capita) (lbs./capita) (lbs./capita) ($/capita)Average 157.1 3.9 17.5 12.8 16.7 28848.5Minimum 109.6 1.6 15.0 11.3 11.5 22387.2Maximum 238.5 6.5 20.8 14.8 22.4 34927.6Median 144.1 3.9 17.0 12.7 17.0 28230.4Standard Deviation 35.8 1.2 1.4 0.7 3.2 3489.4Coefficient of Variation 22.8% 30.3% 8.0% 5.7% 19.0% 12.1%
![Page 38: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Correlation MatrixTP TQ BfQ PkQ ChQ Inc
TP 1TQ -0.577 1BfQ 0.868 -0.598 1PkQ 0.186 0.315 0.022 1ChQ -0.933 0.427 -0.763 -0.230 1Inc -0.911 0.476 -0.751 -0.200 0.957 1
![Page 39: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Model 2TP = b0 + b1*TQ + b2*BfQ + b3*PkQ + b4*ChQ + b5*Inc
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression StatisticsMultiple R 0.971R Square 0.944Adjusted R Square 0.941Standard Error 8.684Observations 116
ANOVAdf SS MS F Significance F
Regression 5 139014.884 27802.977 368.672 5.59838E-67Residual 110 8295.531 75.414Total 115 147310.415
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Intercept 105.295 31.643 3.328 0.001 42.586 168.003TQ -4.955 0.985 -5.029 0.000 -6.907 -3.002BfQ 7.656 1.004 7.625 0.000 5.666 9.646PkQ 4.410 1.296 3.403 0.001 1.842 6.978ChQ -6.261 0.897 -6.978 0.000 -8.039 -4.483Inc 0.000 0.001 -0.493 0.623 -0.002 0.001
![Page 40: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Model 2: Actual and Predicted Real Quarterly Retail Turkey Prices, 1980-2008
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
220.0
240.0
80.1 82.1 84.1 86.1 88.1 90.1 92.1 94.1 96.1 98.1 00.1 02.1 04.1 06.1 08.1
Date (Year.Quarter)
Rea
l Pri
ce (
cen
ts/lb
.)
Actual
Predicted
![Page 41: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Model 2: Residuals (Actual minus Predicted) for Predicting Real Quarterly Retail Turkey Prices, 1980-2008
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
80.1 82.1 84.1 86.1 88.1 90.1 92.1 94.1 96.1 98.1 00.1 02.1 04.1 06.1 08.1
Date (Year.Quarter)
Err
or
(cen
ts/lb
.)
![Page 42: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Model 1 vs. Model 2: Residuals (Actual minus Predicted) for Predicting Real Quarterly Retail Turkey Prices, 1980-2008
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
80.1 82.1 84.1 86.1 88.1 90.1 92.1 94.1 96.1 98.1 00.1 02.1 04.1 06.1 08.1
Date (Year.Quarter)
Err
or
(cen
ts/lb
.)
Model 1
Model 2
![Page 43: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Model 2TP = b0 + b1*TQ + b2*BfQ + b3*PkQ + b4*ChQ + b5*Inc
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression StatisticsMultiple R 0.971R Square 0.944Adjusted R Square 0.941Standard Error 8.684Observations 116
ANOVAdf SS MS F Significance F
Regression 5 139014.884 27802.977 368.672 5.59838E-67Residual 110 8295.531 75.414Total 115 147310.415
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Intercept 105.295 31.643 3.328 0.001 42.586 168.003TQ -4.955 0.985 -5.029 0.000 -6.907 -3.002BfQ 7.656 1.004 7.625 0.000 5.666 9.646PkQ 4.410 1.296 3.403 0.001 1.842 6.978ChQ -6.261 0.897 -6.978 0.000 -8.039 -4.483Inc 0.000 0.001 -0.493 0.623 -0.002 0.001
![Page 44: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Performance Summary of Model 2
•Adj. R-square 0.94 better than twice 1•RMSE = 8.68 cents/lb less than 1/3 of 1•BfQ & PkQ unexpected signs
& statistically significant
• Appears to be seasonality not accounted for in other regressors
![Page 45: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
![Page 46: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Mathematical Conceptual Model
Model 3 Seasonality AdjustmentTP = b0 + b1TQ + b2BfQ + b3PkQ+ b4ChQ + b5INC + b6Q1Dum + b7Q2Dum + b8Q3Dum + e
Where:Q1Dum = 1 in qtr 1 and 0 otherwiseQ2Dum = 1 in qtr 2 and 0 otherwiseQ3Dum = 1 in qtr 3 and 0 otherwise
![Page 47: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Dummy variables in spreadsheet
Year Qtr Q1Dum Q2Dum Q3Dum Q4Dum1980 1 1 0 0 0
2 0 1 0 03 0 0 1 04 0 0 0 1
1981 1 1 0 0 02 0 1 0 03 0 0 1 04 0 0 0 1
etc....
Drop one dummy variable column when estimate regression
![Page 48: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Model 3TP = b0 + b1*TQ + b2*BfQ + b3*PkQ + b4*ChQ + b5*Inc + b6*Qtr1 Dummy + b7*Qtr2 Dummy + b8*Qtr3 Dummy
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression StatisticsMultiple R 0.974R Square 0.948Adjusted R Square 0.944Standard Error 8.463Observations 116
ANOVAdf SS MS F Significance F
Regression 8 139645.990 17455.749 243.693 5.07518E-65Residual 107 7664.425 71.630Total 115 147310.415
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Intercept 207.993 47.559 4.373 0.000 113.713 302.272TQ -10.790 2.284 -4.724 0.000 -15.319 -6.262BfQ 4.910 1.462 3.358 0.001 2.011 7.808PkQ 2.821 1.540 1.832 0.070 -0.232 5.874ChQ -6.183 1.040 -5.947 0.000 -8.244 -4.122Inc -0.00051 0.001 -0.578 0.565 -0.002 0.001Qtr 1 Dummy -16.583 6.144 -2.699 0.008 -28.762 -4.404Qtr 2 Dummy -14.330 5.525 -2.594 0.011 -25.284 -3.377Qtr 3 Dummy -8.143 4.510 -1.806 0.074 -17.084 0.797
![Page 49: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Performance Summary of model 3
•Adj. R-square 0.94 comparable to 2•RMSE = 8.46 cents/lb bit less than 2•Signs on coeff. ok except BfQ & PkQ
See what happens when we drop BfQ
![Page 50: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Mathematical Conceptual Model
Model 4TP = b0 + b1TQ + b2BfQ + b3PkQ
+ b4ChQ + b5INC + b6Q1Dum + b7Q2Dum + b8Q3Dum + e
or
TP = b0 + b1TQ + b2PkQ + b3ChQ+b4INC + b5Q1Dum + b6Q2Dum + b7Q3Dum + e
![Page 51: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Model 4TP = b0 + b1*TQ + b2*PkQ + b3*ChQ + b4*Inc + b5*Qtr1 Dummy + b6*Qtr2 Dummy + b7*Qtr3 Dummy
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression StatisticsMultiple R 0.971R Square 0.942Adjusted R Square 0.939Standard Error 8.857Observations 116
ANOVAdf SS MS F Significance F
Regression 7 138838.516 19834.074 252.845 6.4152E-64Residual 108 8471.899 78.444Total 115 147310.415
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Intercept 337.344 29.181 11.560 0.000 279.503 395.186TQ -16.097 1.726 -9.326 0.000 -19.518 -12.676PkQ 2.245 1.601 1.402 0.164 -0.929 5.419ChQ -7.410 1.019 -7.274 0.000 -9.429 -5.390Inc 0.000 0.001 -0.131 0.896 -0.002 0.002Qtr 1 Dummy -29.098 5.110 -5.694 0.000 -39.228 -18.969Qtr 2 Dummy -21.879 5.282 -4.142 0.000 -32.348 -11.410Qtr 3 Dummy -11.915 4.571 -2.607 0.010 -20.975 -2.855
![Page 52: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Performance Summary of model 4
•Adj. R-square 0.94 , about as high as any other•RMSE = 8.85 cents/lb bit more than 3•Signs on coeff. o.k. except pork •Pork marginally statistically significant•Income not close to statistically significant•All rest are significant
What do you think????
![Page 53: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Testing Between Models
We use an F-test to statisticallycompare two NESTED models.
Nested models are those in whichone is a subset of the other andboth models have same dependentvariable and were estimated oversame time period.
![Page 54: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Nested vs Nonnested Models
Model 1TP = f (TQ)Model 2TP = f (TQ, BfQ, PkQ, ChQ, INC)Model 3TP = f (TQ, BfQ, PkQ, ChQ, INC, Q1D, Q2D, Q3D)Model 4TP = f (TQ, PkQ, ChQ, INC, Q1D, Q2D, Q3D)
Nested Model pairs:1 is nested in 2; 2 is nested in 3;4 is nested in 3; 1 is nested in 4, etc.
![Page 55: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Testing Between Models 2 and 3
Model 2TP = f (TQ, BfQ, PkQ, ChQ, INC)Model 3TP = f (TQ, BfQ, PkQ, ChQ, INC, Q1D, Q2D, Q3D)
Null Hypothesis: Alternative Hypothesis:Ho: b6=b7=b8=0 Not Ho
Use an F-test to test this hypothesis.
![Page 56: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
F - Test:
(SSRr- SSRf) / (q) (SSRf / DFf)
Where:SSRr is the sum of squared residuals from
reduced or smaller modelSSRf is the sum of squared residuals from
full or bigger modelq is the number of restrictionsDFf is the degrees of freedom full model
F =
![Page 57: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
F - Test Criteria:
(SSRr - SSRf) / (q) (SSRf / DFf)
Compare to critical F-table valueof F (q, DFf, alpha) or F(v1, v2, 0.05).
If F > F(q, DFf, 0.05) then reject null andconclude that full model is better thanreduced model
F =
![Page 58: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Testing Between Models 2 and 3:
Null Hypothesis: Alternative HypothesisHo: b6=b7=b8=0 Not Ho
F = (8,295.5 – 7,664.4) / 3 (7,664.4 / 107 )
= 2.94
F (3, 107, 0.05) = ~2.70
Conclusion: Reject Ho, 95% certain model 3is better, i.e., seasonal variables significant
![Page 59: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Summary of Regression Performance
•R-square •RMSE •Signs on parameters correct?•Statistical Significance of Parameters?•Comparison between models•Economic logic consistency
•Economic importance of estimates
![Page 60: Empirical Modeling Process 1 - Identify Problem / Question 2 - Conceptualize model 3 - Collect data 4 - Examine and Summarize data 5 - Estimate model.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ed25503460f94be1849/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Summary of Regression Challenges
• Conceptual model wrong • Fail to include important variable(s)• Patterns in residuals• Omitted Relevant Variables• Spurious relationships?• other problems…..