Joy Kirchner

COPPUL –

University of

Alber ta

June 10, 2013.

EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES

in Open Scholarship

ACRL Scholarly Communications Roadshow:

From Understanding to Engagement

Identify and examine current models and programming that

support “openness”

Understand new technologies and methods to advance the

creation, flow, dissemination and preservation of scholarly

information

Discuss growing movement towards alternative methods of

measuring impact of scholarship

Explore models you might consider piloting or experimenting

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Open to contributions and participation

Open and free to access for all

Open to use & reuse w/few or no

restrictions

Open to interoperability & machine

readable

WHAT DO WE MEAN BY OPEN?

PARTICIPATE

in

BUILDING

and

CONTRIBUTE

EXPERTISE

Octocat® is a registered trademark of the GitHub, Inc.

AS

OPPOSED

TO…

are either registered trademarks or

trademarks of Adobe

Systems Incorporated in the United States

and/or other countries.

OPEN

and

FREE TO

ACCESS

©OpenSourceWay, used with permission under CC BY-SA

AS

OPPOSED

TO…

©Amanda Munoz, used with permission under CC-BY

OPEN TO USE

and

REUSE WITH

FEW or NO

RESTRICTIONS

AS

OPPOSED

TO…

OPEN TO USE

and

REUSE WITH

FEW or NO

RESTRICTIONS

©OpenSourceWay, used with permission under CC BY-SA

AS

OPPOSED

TO…

©Wellcome Images, used with permission under CC BY-NC-ND

OPEN TO

MACHINE

READING,

INDEXING,

and

PROCESSING

AS

OPPOSED

TO…

Generally enabled by technology

Works both inside and outside of

traditional models

Supported by a variety of business models

Democratization of information

COMMONALITIES

Open access literature is

digital, online, free of

charge, and free of most

copyright and licensing

restrictions.

- Peter Suber

OPEN ACCESS

Gratis: You can read it for free. Anything else,

you better ask permission.

Libre: With credit given, OK to text-mine, re-

catalog, mirror for preservation, quote, remix,

whatever.

Most OA is gratis. You get to “libre” via

Creative Commons licensing, usually.

( tex t f rom Dorothea Salo )

GRATIS VS. LIBRE

1) Open Access publishing

2) Author self-archiving

2.5) Hybrid open access

publishing

TWO (AND A HALF) ROADS TO

OPEN ACCESS

The winding roads of Spain” by SKI Tripper, CC-BY,

http://www.flickr.com/photos/nzer/2640367659

OPENING THE ACADEMY…

©Taki Steve, used with permission under CC BY

OPENNESS IN THE SCIENCES

Source: NASA

OPEN SCIENCE

OPEN SCIENCE

OPENNESS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES

Source: Screengrab from OSM Tasking Manager (http://tasks.hotosm.org/job/196)

OPENNESS IN THE HUMANITIES

© Bettinche, used with permission under CC BY-NC

OPENNESS IN THE HUMANITIES

© Bettinche, used with permission under CC BY-NC

University of Victoria. Internet Shakespeare Editions (http://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca)

INTERDISCIPLINARITY

© Rick Gordon, used with permission under CC NC-ND

MEASURING THE IMPACT OF ‘OPEN’

Source: Screengrab from ImpactStory

INNOVATIONS IN COMMUNICATION

Source: Screengrab from PeerJ and PaperCritic

INNOVATIONS IN COMMUNICATION

Source: Screengrab from Unglueit.com

OPEN BOOK

COLLABORATIVE OPPORTUNITES

COLLABORATIVES TO SUPPORT STEWARDSHIP OF UNIQUE ASSETS

HATHI TRUST

COLLABORATIVE OPPORTUNITES

DISTRIBUTED COLLABORATIVE

NETWORK

Eg. Institute for the Future of the

Book; Biodiversity Heritage

Library

COLLECTIVES TO SUPPORT OPEN

SCHOLARSHIP

COPE

Public Knowledge project

SCOAP3

Collaborative IR’s

(Australia - ARROW, EU -

Openaire)

CONCLUDING REMARKS

Hey, T. , Tans ley, S. , & Tol le , K. The Fourth Paradigm: Data In tensive Sc ient i f ic Discovery. (2009). Redmond, WA: Microsof t Corporat ion. Onl ine: h t tp: / / research.microsof t .com/en -us/col laborat ion/ fourthparadigm/

Housewr ight , R. , Schonfeld , R.C. & Wul fson, K. I thaka S+R US Facul ty Survey 2012 . (8 Apr i l 2013). Onl ine: h t tp: / /www.sr. i thaka.org/research -publ icat ions/us-facul ty-survey-2012

Johnson, L . , Adams Becker, S. , Cummins, M. , Est rada, V. , Freeman, A. , & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Hor izon Report : 2013 Higher Educat ion Edi t ion . Aust in, Texas: The New Media Consort ium. Onl ine: h t tp: / /www.nmc.org/publ icat ions/2013-hor izon-report -h igher-ed

Mul l ins, J . L . , Murray-Rust , C. , Ogburn, J . L . , Crow, R. , Iv ins , O. , Mower, A. , Nesdi l l , D. , Newton, M. P. , Speer, J . , & Watk inson, C. (2012). Library Publ ishing Serv ices: St rategies for Success: F ina l Research Report . Washington, DC: SPARC. Onl ine: h t tp: / /docs. l ib.purdue.edu/purduepress_ebooks/24 /

Smith, K.K. & N. L . Maron. Current Models of Dig i ta l Scholar ly Communicat ions: Resul ts o f an Invest igat ion Conducted by I thaka for the Associat ion of Research L ibrar ies. (2008). Onl ine: h t tp: / /www.ar l .org/news/6/1148

RESOURCES

ON THE CARD PROVIDED WRITE DOWN:

5 MINUTES

1. AN OPEN SCHOLARSHIP MODEL YOU WOULD LIKE EVERYONE

TO KNOW ABOUT.

2. URL

3. WHY YOU THINK IT IS IMPORTANT

ACTIVITY

Portions of this work was originally created by Sarah L.

Shreeves and revised by Marisa L. Ramírez and Joy Kirchner on

May 2, 2013. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States

License. To view a copy of the license see

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by -nc-sa/3.0/us/

ATTRIBUTION