Emanuela Galasso Development Research Group The World Bank Improving parenting skills in Chile: the...
-
Upload
virgil-smith -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Emanuela Galasso Development Research Group The World Bank Improving parenting skills in Chile: the...
Emanuela GalassoDevelopment Research Group
The World Bank
Improving parenting skills in Chile: the evaluation of Nadie es Perfecto
Why parenting skills? Believed to have a key role in fostering the development of
children
Parents might not have the information or psychosocial wellbeing to support them in adopting healthy and positive parenting practices
Socio-economic gradients in ECD outcomes emerge early and increase with ageParenting account for a significant fraction of the socio-economic gradients
in early childhood outcomes
Socio-economic gradients in ECD: opportunities are determined early
Nadie es Perfecto (NeP)Component of Chile Crece Contigo aiming at
improving parenting skills NeP adapted from a large scale program in Canada
offered since the 1980sTargets families with children 0-5
Universal to all families accessing public healthPreferential to household with vulnerabilities
Group based parent education sessions (6-8)Structured sessions led by a trained facilitatorsAdult education strategies to enhance participation
Program perspective: Why evaluate?Key learning tool: use the evaluation to feed back into
the design of the program during its scaling up phaseCan be a key tool to assess the relative effectiveness
of alternative service delivery mechanismsAllow to rigourously quantify (short term and
projected long term) benefits, to be combined to cost data to measure cost-effectiveness
General perspective: why evaluate NeP?Knowledge gap on the effectiveness of ECD
interventions:early childhood developments interventions that involve
home visits combined with intensive opportunities for skill building have been shown to have high returns -often associated with high costs.
Very little rigourous evidence on parenting interventions. Relatively lower costs Improved parenting practices. Do they improve child outcomes?
Use evaluations to improve our understanding of key determinants of parental behavior and investment in children
Engle et al (2007), LANCET series on early childhood development highlights parenting interventions as one of the key research gaps
The evaluation design As the program is able to cover at the beginning only
a small fraction of the target population, build in the evaluation on the current methodology of enrolling families:
Control de salud sano as the key contact point with the families
For each facilitator: identify a list of “potential” participants among the target population jointly with the health team (applied using the inclusion-exclusion criteria)
Use this list as the sampling frame for the evaluation (lista de espera)
The evaluation design From this list, invite the families to participate to the
program:1. Half invited to participate this year to NeP2. Half invited to participate one year from now
(access to unstructured parenting sessions) Given the large list of potentially eligible participants
into the program, not able to cover all at the same time, assign eligibles participants to the the two groups randomly
Power calculations (250 facilitators, 6 children each group, effect size 0.25 SD for participants)
The evaluation designEligible list (by facilitator)
protocols and informed consent to be cleared by the national Comité de Etica
invited to participate to NePIn the first year(‘treatment’ group)
Guaranteed to be invited to participate to NeP after 12 months(‘control’ group)
The evaluation design Can reproduce the same protocol to assign an
‘intensive’ version of NeP (ex. group parenting + extra session(s) with children)
Would allow us to have three groups1. NEP basic2. NEP plus (intensive)3. Control group (access to non structured education
sessions)
(1) vs (3) and (2) vs (3) allow to quantify returns (1) vs (2) allows to relative effectiveness
The evaluation timeline 2010 +6m +12m
+3yrs
baseline follow-up ( 2nd follow-up
survey surveysurvey)
intermediateSTART PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
Questions addressed by the evaluationDoes the parenting program improve knowledge and
behavior in parenting practices? Does the program improve the mental well being of
mothers, parental psychosocial distress, perceived social support?
Do the improved practices translate in improved child health and safety?
Do the improved practices and mental health translate into proved child development outcomes?
What is the value-added of increased intensity on the same outcomes?
Who is going to take-up the program? Take-up of unstructured parent education session is
about 50%Parents self-select based on the expected gains and
the knowledge/awareness of the benefitsAwareness of the importance of parenting expected
to be higher in families with older children (3-5)Aim at reaching the younger cohorts (0-2)
Discussing an enhanced contact protocol to increase participation the younger subgroup
Outcome indicators (tbd)Parenting: knowledge, attitudes and practices (HOME)
and Parent-Child interaction (observed play)Parental mental health and psychosocial well-beingPerceived social supportChild development outcomes:
Self report (Ages and Stages questionnaire) all ages Direct tests younger children 0-2S (Bayley’s)Direct tests 3-5 on specific sub-domains: Receptive language (TVIP)Socio-emotional developmentExecutive function (attention, working memory,
inhibition)
Evaluation teamSecretaria Ejecutiva Nadie es Perfecto MINSAL
(Miguel Cordero, Cecilia Moraga, Felipe Arriet)Evaluation unit, Division Social MIDEPLAN (Rodrigo
Herrera, Paula Castro)Universidad Catolica de Chile, Departamento de Salud
Publica (Paula Bedregal)Pedro Carneiro (Department of Economics University
College London), Emanuela Galasso (Research Department, The World Bank)