Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project Wednesday ... · Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI-...
Transcript of Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project Wednesday ... · Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI-...
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
1111 | | | | P a g e
PBI: PBI: PBI: PBI: INDOOR INDOOR INDOOR INDOOR AIR QUALITY PROJECTAIR QUALITY PROJECTAIR QUALITY PROJECTAIR QUALITY PROJECT AUTHORSAUTHORSAUTHORSAUTHORS’ NAMES: NAMES: NAMES: NAMES: Liz Gutierrez
TITLE OF THE LESSON: TITLE OF THE LESSON: TITLE OF THE LESSON: TITLE OF THE LESSON: Survey Analysis, Chi Square, and Scientific Paper.
TECHNOLOGY LESSONTECHNOLOGY LESSONTECHNOLOGY LESSONTECHNOLOGY LESSON: : : : No
DATE OF LESSON: DATE OF LESSON: DATE OF LESSON: DATE OF LESSON: Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
LENGTH OF LESSON: LENGTH OF LESSON: LENGTH OF LESSON: LENGTH OF LESSON: 90 minutes
NAME OF COURSE: NAME OF COURSE: NAME OF COURSE: NAME OF COURSE: PBI-High School Classroom
TEKS ADDRESSED: TEKS ADDRESSED: TEKS ADDRESSED: TEKS ADDRESSED:
TEKS: 111.23 (11) Probability and statistics. The student understands that the way a set of data is displayed influences its interpretation. The student is expected to:
(A) select and use an appropriate representation for presenting and displaying relationships among collected data, including line plot, line graph, bar graph, stem and leaf plot, circle graph, and Venn diagrams, and justify the selection; and (B) Make inferences and convincing arguments based on an analysis of given or collected data.
(12) Probability and statistics. The student uses measures of central tendency and variability to describe a set of data. The student is expected to:
(A) Describe a set of data using mean, median, mode, and range; and (B) Choose among mean, median, mode, or range to describe a set of data and justify the choice for a particular situation.
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES: PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES: PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES: PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES:
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
2222 | | | | P a g e
SWBAT… Correctly perform Chi-Square on Survey results and write up a mini-scientific paper to display/describe results. RESOURCES: RESOURCES: RESOURCES: RESOURCES: None
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: None
SUPLEMENTARY MATERIALS, HANDOUTS: SUPLEMENTARY MATERIALS, HANDOUTS: SUPLEMENTARY MATERIALS, HANDOUTS: SUPLEMENTARY MATERIALS, HANDOUTS: • Chi Square Worksheet… similar to survey data with different data per
group. o (3 options calculated)
• Chi Square Chart ENGAGEMENTENGAGEMENTENGAGEMENTENGAGEMENT Time: Time: Time: Time: 15 minutes15 minutes15 minutes15 minutes What the TeacWhat the TeacWhat the TeacWhat the Teacher Will Doher Will Doher Will Doher Will Do Probing QuestionsProbing QuestionsProbing QuestionsProbing Questions Student ResponsesStudent ResponsesStudent ResponsesStudent Responses
Potential MisconceptionsPotential MisconceptionsPotential MisconceptionsPotential Misconceptions Say:
We have the data from
the survey and we analyzed it by looking and
calculating the what?
• The Mean • The Mode
Are we done? Is that all we wanted to know? What
do we do with the data now?
• Yes, we’re done • Analyze it again • Analyze it better
Why do you think we are
done or not done? We’re done because we
already know which option
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
3333 | | | | P a g e
was chosen the most by looking at the mean and
the mode!
We’re not done, that didn’t seem like enough.
Well let’s see, what did we do before we
conducted the surveys?
• We hypothesized the results
• We created the survey
Yes! We created the survey and we
hypothesized the results. How did those hypothesis
statements begin?
• -------- option will be chosen the most out of the 3 because….
Right so we hypothesized that ONE of the options would be chosen more than the others do we
know that yet?
Yes. The mean and the mode told us that.
Yes, absolutely the mean and the mode both tell us which option was chosen
the most. But is there
• I don’t know • Yes • No
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
4444 | | | | P a g e
some kind of test that we can conduct to see if our
hypothesis was statistically correct?
If yes… what test is that? • I don’t know
EXPLORATIONEXPLORATIONEXPLORATIONEXPLORATION Time: Time: Time: Time: 15 minutes15 minutes15 minutes15 minutes What the Teacher Will DoWhat the Teacher Will DoWhat the Teacher Will DoWhat the Teacher Will Do Probing Probing Probing Probing QuestionsQuestionsQuestionsQuestions Student ResponsesStudent ResponsesStudent ResponsesStudent Responses
Potential MisconceptionsPotential MisconceptionsPotential MisconceptionsPotential Misconceptions As a class:
Work through a quick and straightforward set of data in order to introduce the
definition of the Chi Square Test
That test is the Chi Chi Chi Chi Square Test.Square Test.Square Test.Square Test. The Chi-Square test is a statistical test which computes the probability that there is no significant difference between the expected frequency of an occurrence with the
What do you think that means?
• I don’t know • It’s going to
calculate the expected frequencies of something….
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
5555 | | | | P a g e
observed frequency of that occurrence. Again… The Chi-Square test is a statistical test which computes the probability that there is no significant difference between the expected frequency of an occurrence with the observed frequency of that occurrence.
What do you think it means to compute the
probability that THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANT
DIFFERENCE between the EXPECTED frequency of an occurrence with the OBSERVED frequency of
that occurrence?
• It’s going to calculate the difference between our hypothesized results and the results we actually got.
Can anybody think of something that has an
easily discernable expected and observable
frequency?
• Tossing a coin, has 50% expected and observed frequency because there are only 2 possibilities…
Just to review… Where does our data come from?
• The results from our surveys
So what do you think our OBSERVED frequencies
are?
• The results from our survey, so the frequency in which each option was
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
6666 | | | | P a g e
chosen
So what do you think our EXPECTED
FREQUENCY is?
• Our hypothesis about that one of the options would be chosen more than the others.
Say… Although our hypothesis consists of which option WE expected to be chosen the most the Chi Square Test is a tests of FAIRNESS…
In other words, in an ideal and fair world how often
would each option be chosen?
• They would all be chosen the same amount of times… they’d be equal
Right! If the chi square test, tests for fairness than the test has to know what would be fair…. Now, for our surveys, what do you think our EXPECTED FREQUENCIES WOULD BE?
• 25% for each option, which means each option would have been chosen 25 times in our survey
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
7777 | | | | P a g e
How did you come up with those numbers?
Come up to the board to
show the class.
Since the chi square is a test of fairness, and we said that in order for the test to know what is fair,
we must tell it…
I calculated the numbers as follows…
We surveyed 100 people and had 4 options. So in order for it to be fair each option would be chosen
the same number of times…. So each option
would be chosen 25 times….
25(%) +25(%) +25(%) +25(%) = 100(%)
Good, so in order to calculate your survey
statistics… what is your EXPECTED
FREQUENCY?
25 people or 25%.
And your OBSERVED FREQUENCY?
That’s the percentage that you actually got from your
survey.
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
8888 | | | | P a g e
EXPLANATIONEXPLANATIONEXPLANATIONEXPLANATION Time: Time: Time: Time: 30 m30 m30 m30 minutesinutesinutesinutes What the Teacher Will DoWhat the Teacher Will DoWhat the Teacher Will DoWhat the Teacher Will Do Probing QuestionsProbing QuestionsProbing QuestionsProbing Questions Student Student Student Student ResponseResponseResponseResponse
Potential MisconceptionsPotential MisconceptionsPotential MisconceptionsPotential Misconceptions Divide students into
groups and Pass out Chi Square worksheets.
Students will work in their groups to calculate the
Chi Square of their group data… each group will have different data all
probing questions will be directed to specific data…
probing questions referring to specific data is for illustration purposes.
Students will present their conclusions to the class
for discussion.
Say… Now in order for you to
get more familiar with the Chi Square Test we’re going to work through a
problem together.
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
9999 | | | | P a g e
Briefly introduce the problem from the
worksheet.
There is a river with 3 large species of fish
gumpies, sticklebarbs, and spotheads, and we want to perform a Chi Square test to see the
frequency in which they inhabit the river.
In order to conduct this test a random sample of 300 fish was taken from
the river. How many species of fish
are we looking at?
So what is our EXPECTED
FREQUENCY for each fish?
• 33.3%
How did you calculate that?
• Since there are only 3 types of fish… and our EXPECTED FREQUENCY is
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
10101010 | | | | P a g e
that each fish will be found at the same frequency we have…
• 33.3% +33.3%+ 33.3%= 99.9%
So how many fish are EXPECTE from each
type?
• 33 • 100
Why do you say 33? Because that’s our
frequency…
So 33 is 33% of a sample of 300 fish?
No
Why do you say 100? Because 100 is 33.3% of 300.
Of the sample of 300 fish:
89 Gupies 120 Sticklebarbs
91 Spotheads Were retrieved.
(Each group will have
different data from different “lakes”)
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
11111111 | | | | P a g e
So at what frequency were the Gupies found? And how do we calculate
the frequency?
We calculate the frequency by calculating
the average. So we take 89/300 and
we get that the frequency at which Gupies were
found is ~29.7% At what frequency were
the Sticklebarbs found in the river?
~40.0%
And the Spotheads? ~30.3%
The question of statistical significance in this situation is of the
observed frequency pattern of 89/120/91 versus the expected frequency pattern of
100/100/100. And the first step in answering the question is to devise a way for measuring the
degree to which the two patterns differ from each
other.
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
12121212 | | | | P a g e
How can we calculate the difference between the EXPECTED and the OBSERVED frequencies?
I don’t know.
How do we calculate the DIFFERENCE between any two things?
By subtracting.
A straightforward way of going about this would be
to take, for each of the three categories, the
difference between the observed frequency and the expected frequency,
and then divide that difference by the expected
frequency.
Why would we divide the difference by the expected frequency?
• In order to take the average again
• To compare the difference by the expected frequency
The outcome of this operation would be a
measure of the proportionate amount by
which each observed frequency deviates from
its corresponding expected frequency.
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
13131313 | | | | P a g e
Go ahead and take a few minutes to calculate the differences between the observed and expected
frequencies divided by the expected frequencies...
(Allow students time to calculate proportions)
Now let’s talk about our findings.
How does the frequency of Gupies in the sample differ from the expected
frequency?
• The observed population of Gupies is 11% smaller than the expected frequency.
How does the frequency
of Sticklebarbs in the sample differ from the expected frequency?
• The population of observed Sticklebarbs is 20% greater than the expected frequency.
And the Spotheads? • The population of Spotheads is 9% smaller than the expected
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
14141414 | | | | P a g e
frequency.
The advantage of this procedure is that you will find it easy to know what
is being measured.
Its limitation is that the proportionate differences measured for the several
categories—in the present example,
—.11, +.20, and —.09— will always sum to zero
and so will not be able to provide a measure of how much the observed and
expected patterns of frequencies differ from
each other overall.
How do you think we can overcome this problem?
• Squaring the difference.
How would squaring the
difference take care of the problem?
Because when we square a number we get rid of any negative numbers so our difference would no
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
15151515 | | | | P a g e
longer = 0.
The effect of this operation will be to get rid
of the minus signs and thus provide a set of
measures whose sum will reflect the aggregate
degree of difference that actually exists between
the observed and expected patterns of frequencies. For the
present example, where the patterns are 89/120/91
and 100/100/100.
Go ahead and take some time to redo your
calculations, but this time square the difference!
What was the squared difference for the Gupies?
1.21
Sticklebarbs? 4.0
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
16161616 | | | | P a g e
Spotheads? .81
And the Sum of the squared differences
comes out to?
6. 02
Briefly talk about Chi Square Notation:
= (OOOO—EEEE)2
EEEE
= 1.21 + 4.0 + .81
= 6.02
In order to finish up our calculations we must
determine the Degrees of freedom, dfdfdfdf, is simply an index of the amount of
random variability, mere chance coincidence that
can be present in a particular situation. Its
closest literal translation would be something along
the line of "degrees of arbitrariness."
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
17171717 | | | | P a g e
In our fish example the number of categorical
cells is three; hence dfdfdfdf=2. Now look at the chart on
the last page of your packet and write a quick paragraph depicting what you conclude from the fish
example, based on our Chi Square result of 6.02
with df=2.
Discuss within your survey groups and prepare to
present your lakes findings with the class.
ELABORATIONELABORATIONELABORATIONELABORATION Time: Time: Time: Time: 15 mi15 mi15 mi15 minutesnutesnutesnutes What the Teacher Will DoWhat the Teacher Will DoWhat the Teacher Will DoWhat the Teacher Will Do Probing QuestionsProbing QuestionsProbing QuestionsProbing Questions Student ResponsesStudent ResponsesStudent ResponsesStudent Responses
Potential MisconceptionsPotential MisconceptionsPotential MisconceptionsPotential Misconceptions Students will use Chi
Square test to conduct statistical analysis on their
survey data.
Hold individual workshops to help students with their
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
18181818 | | | | P a g e
calculations or check their finished calculations. Allow students time to
finish mini-scientific papers.
EVALUATIONEVALUATIONEVALUATIONEVALUATION THURSDAY/FRIDAYTHURSDAY/FRIDAYTHURSDAY/FRIDAYTHURSDAY/FRIDAY
What the Teacher Will DoWhat the Teacher Will DoWhat the Teacher Will DoWhat the Teacher Will Do Probing QuestionsProbing QuestionsProbing QuestionsProbing Questions Student ResponsesStudent ResponsesStudent ResponsesStudent Responses Potential MisconceptionsPotential MisconceptionsPotential MisconceptionsPotential Misconceptions
Evaluation of survey analysis/conclusions.
(Thursday)
Evaluation of scientific paper. (Friday)
(Paper)
Filled in Table from Filled in Table from Filled in Table from Filled in Table from ONE ONE ONE ONE WorksheetWorksheetWorksheetWorksheet, (each group will get different data to work , (each group will get different data to work , (each group will get different data to work , (each group will get different data to work with)with)with)with)::::
gumpies sticklebarbs spotheads Totals
ObservedObservedObservedObserved frequency of cases
89 (29.7%)
120 (40.0%)
91 (30.3%)
300
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
19191919 | | | | P a g e
ExpectedExpectedExpectedExpected frequency of cases (MCE)
100 (33.3%)
100 (33.3%)
100 (33.3%)
300
Results from proportions of differences over expected frequency:Results from proportions of differences over expected frequency:Results from proportions of differences over expected frequency:Results from proportions of differences over expected frequency:
gumpies: (89—100)
100
= —.11
sticklebarbs:
(120—100)
100
= +.20
spotheads: (91—100)
100
= —.09
Results after squaring the differences:Results after squaring the differences:Results after squaring the differences:Results after squaring the differences:
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
20202020 | | | | P a g e
Name:_______________________________________ Date:__________________
CHICHICHICHI----SQUARE TESTSQUARE TESTSQUARE TESTSQUARE TEST WORKSHEETWORKSHEETWORKSHEETWORKSHEET
The ChiChiChiChi----Square testSquare testSquare testSquare test is a statistical test which computes the probability that there is no significant difference between the expected frequency of an occurrence with the observed frequency of that occurrence. For more than a century, the three species of large fish—
gumpies, sticklebarbs, and spotheads—that are native to a certain river have been observed to co-exist in equal proportions of one-third each. But now a random sample of 300 large fish drawn from a standard fish- sampling location has turned
gumpies: (89—100)2
100
= 1.21
sticklebarbs:
(120—100)2
100
= 4.0
spotheads: (91—100)2
100
= .81
sum = 6.02
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
21212121 | | | | P a g e
up numbers and proportions suggesting that something has occurred to upset the natural ecology of the river. If the three fish species still inhabited the river in equal proportions, we would expect to find about 100 instances of each in a sample of size N=300; whereas what we actually observe are 89 gumpies, 120 sticklebarbs, and 91 spotheads. Fill in the table with the appropriate numbers.
Gumpies Sticklebarbs Spotheads Totals
OBSERVED frequency
________ (_____%)
________ (_____%)
________ (_____%)
________
EXPECTED frequency
_________ (_____%)
________ (_____%)
_________ (_____%)
________
Chi Square Worksheet Continued...
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
22222222 | | | | P a g e
Proportion of Differences:Proportion of Differences:Proportion of Differences:Proportion of Differences:
Gupies:Gupies:Gupies:Gupies:
observed frequency—expected frequency
expected frequency
Sticklebarbs:Sticklebarbs:Sticklebarbs:Sticklebarbs:
observed frequency—expected frequency
expected frequency
Spotheads:Spotheads:Spotheads:Spotheads:
observed frequency—expected frequency
expected frequency
Sum of the Differences:Sum of the Differences:Sum of the Differences:Sum of the Differences:____________________________________________________________
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
23232323 | | | | P a g e
Chi Square Worksheet Continued...
Proportion of Proportion of Proportion of Proportion of Squared Differences:Squared Differences:Squared Differences:Squared Differences: Gupies:Gupies:Gupies:Gupies:
(observed frequency—expected frequency)2
expected frequency
Sticklebarbs:Sticklebarbs:Sticklebarbs:Sticklebarbs:
(observed frequency—expected frequency)2
expected frequency
Spotheads:Spotheads:Spotheads:Spotheads:
(observed frequency—expected frequency)2
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
24242424 | | | | P a g e
expected frequency
Sum of Squared Differences:_________Sum of Squared Differences:_________Sum of Squared Differences:_________Sum of Squared Differences:_____________________________ Chi Square Worksheet Continued... Partial Partial Partial Partial Table of Critical Values of ChiTable of Critical Values of ChiTable of Critical Values of ChiTable of Critical Values of Chi----SquareSquareSquareSquare
Level of Significance (non-directional test)
df
1 2
.05
3.84 5.99
.025
5.02 7.38
.01
6.63 9.21
.005
7.88
10.60
.001
10.83 13.82
Elizabeth Gutierrez PBI- Indoor Air Quality Project
Wednesday & Thursday; Week 4
25252525 | | | | P a g e
3 4 5 — 10 11 —
7.81 9.49
11.07 —
18.31 19.68
—
9.35 11.14 12.83
— 20.48 21.92
—
11.34 13.28 15.09
— 23.21 24.73
—
12.84 14.86 16.75
— 25.19 26.76
—
16.27 18.47 20.52
— 29.59 31.26
—
Illustration for df=2
If the observed value of chi-square is:
smaller than 5.99
equal to 5.99 greater than 5.99
equal to 7.38 greater than 7.38
equal to 9.21 greater than 9.21
etc.
Then it is:
non-significant significant at the .05 level significant beyond the .05 level significant at the .025 level significant beyond the .025 level significant at the .01 level significant beyond the .01 level etc.