Electronics with 2D Crystals: Scaling extender, or ... · 2D crystal semiconductors extend vertical...
Transcript of Electronics with 2D Crystals: Scaling extender, or ... · 2D crystal semiconductors extend vertical...
1 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Electronics with 2D Crystals: Scaling extender, or harbinger of new functions?
1st Workshop on Data Abundant Systems Technology
Stanford, April 2014
Debdeep Jena ([email protected])
Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame
2 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Outline
• Charge-based electronics Conventional Neo
• 2D Crystals Electrostatics Scaling Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures Dielectrics Inversion Transport Effective masses, conventional transport Tunability Contacts
• ‘Neo’ electronics possibilities enabled by 2D crystals
• Challenges moving forward
3 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Outline
• Charge-based electronics Conventional Neo
• 2D Crystals Electrostatics Scaling Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures Dielectrics Inversion Transport Effective masses, conventional transport Tunability Contacts
• ‘Neo’ electronics possibilities enabled by 2D crystals
• Challenges moving forward
4 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
The Transistor: Up against ‘fundamental’ limits
• The transistor is an electronic switch: Digital Electronics • It is also an amplifier: it has gain • Gain @ high speed: RF electronics • Switching @ high voltages: Power electronics
S D G
5 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Charge-based electronics wins for digital electronics
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
10-4
2012
103
CMOS low power
Delay (ps)
Energ
y (
fJ)
CMOS high performance
104 100 101 102 10-1
BISFET
Graphene
nanoribbon
III-
V
Heterojunction
Graphene pn junction
Spin-wave
Spin
FE
T
Preferred
Corner
Nanomagnet
Logic
All-spin
logic
ST oscillator
ST transfer
triad
ST
Majority
gate
ST: Spin-Torque
ST Transfer/
Domain-Wall
Charge- vs spin-based LOGIC
(industry benchmarks)
Energy vs. delay of inverters with fanout 4 with current-controlled switching, Vdd=0.01 V
Physics hiding ‘under the hood’
6 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Electronic switches today
FETs Bipolars
TFETs Other candidates
22nm FinFET
Conventional
Neo
• Scaling • Surfaces/Interfaces • Power consumption • Efficiency/cost
• Scaling • Surfaces/Interfaces • Power consumption • Efficiency/cost • Complementary logic
• Scaling • Surfaces/Interfaces • Performance • Complementary logic
BisFETs, MottFETs, etc…
• Realistic demos • Scaling • Surfaces/Interfaces • Performance • Complementary logic
Need breakthroughs in… Need breakthroughs in…
Need breakthroughs in… Need breakthroughs in…
Silicon CMOS: “The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated”
7 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Bandstructure of traditional semiconductors
• 3D semiconductors: sp3 orbitals. • Conduction by carriers near band edges. • Conduction band (electrons): s-like spherical, isotropic • Valence band (holes): p-like highly anisotropic
sp3 hybridization
Real-space picture of Electron Orbitals
8 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Outline
• Charge-based electronics Conventional Neo
• 2D Crystals Electrostatics Scaling Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures Dielectrics Inversion Transport Effective masses, conventional transport Tunability Contacts
• ‘Neo’ electronics possibilities enabled by 2D crystals
• Challenges moving forward
9 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
2D Crystals: Graphene, Semiconductors, and more…
Graphene Family: Graphene: symmetry zero bandgap Boron Nitride: broken symmetry 5.2 eV bandgap MX2 Family: Semiconducting Metallic, Charge-density wave Magnetic, Superconducting Common characteristics: No out-of-plane chemical bonds Thinnest materials known
Graphene, BN MoS2, MX2 family
10 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Outline
• Charge-based electronics Conventional Neo
• 2D Crystals Electrostatics Scaling Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures Dielectrics Inversion Transport Effective masses, conventional transport Tunability Contacts
• ‘Neo’ electronics possibilities enabled by 2D crystals
• Challenges moving forward
11 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
As 3D Crystal semiconductors become small…
12 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
2D Crystals offer a NEW electronic phase space
2D crystals
13 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Scaling and electrostatics with 2D crystals
2D crystals
2D crystal semiconductors extend vertical scaling. Excellent electrostatics in 2D geometries. Double-gates natural (this is what SOI always wanted to be!). Lateral scaling: Controllable by doping/bandgaps.
14 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Outline
• Charge-based electronics Conventional Neo
• 2D Crystals Electrostatics Scaling Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures Dielectrics Inversion Transport Effective masses, conventional transport Tunability Contacts
• ‘Neo’ electronics possibilities enabled by 2D crystals
• Challenges moving forward
15 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures
• Chemical bonds are made of s, p, and d-orbitals. • No out-of plane bonds No dangling bonds Low chance of interface traps. • Interfaces are ‘pristine’, no strain as in 3D heteroepitaxial materials. • Heterostructures are formed by ‘stacking’ or ‘van-der-Waal’ epitaxy. • Band-offsets are ‘pristine’ and ‘easily’ measured.
16 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Outline
• Charge-based electronics Conventional Neo
• 2D Crystals Electrostatics Scaling Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures Dielectrics Inversion Transport Effective masses, conventional transport Tunability Contacts
• ‘Neo’ electronics possibilities enabled by 2D crystals
• Challenges moving forward
17 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Dielectrics for 2D Crystals: HfO2
• SS ~ 74 mV/decade. • On/Off~108. • Conventional ALD seems to work, but hysteresis may be present. • Nature Nano (Kis group, 2011).
18 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
TFT switches today & the case for layered materials
• Traditional TFT materials (amorphous Si, organics, oxides) have either • Low mobilities (< 1 cm2/V.s) or • Very high subthreshold slopes (~1 V/decade) due to defects
• Layered materials offer a unique solution
log(ID)
VGVDD
MOSFET
off on
SS mobility
IEDM 2012
19 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Multilayer MoS2 Thin-Film Transistor (TFT)
Nat. Comm. 2012
• SS ~ 70 mV/decade. • On/Off~107. • Robust current saturation: first time in a 2D layered crystal! • Current saturation is very important in transistors for gain & fan-out
20 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Dielectrics for 2D Crystals: 2D crystal BN!
• 2D BN breakdown field ~8 MV/cm! • No dangling bonds, much cleaner. • 2D dielectrics for 2D crystals seems feasible. • Columbia group.
21 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Outline
• Charge-based electronics Conventional Neo
• 2D Crystals Electrostatics Scaling Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures Dielectrics Inversion Transport Effective masses, conventional transport Tunability Contacts
• ‘Neo’ electronics possibilities enabled by 2D crystals
• Challenges moving forward
22 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Carrier inversion in MoS2: Observed
• Switching from n-channel to p-channel achieved with ALD dielectric. • Contacts to one type of carriers inversion is slow. • Very essential for complementary logic with 2D crystal semiconductors! • Notre Dame.
23 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
First MoS2 ‘circuits’…
• First rudimentary logic circuits using MoS2
• EPFL (2012) and MIT (2012).
24 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Outline
• Charge-based electronics Conventional Neo
• 2D Crystals Electrostatics Scaling Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures Dielectrics Inversion Transport Effective masses, conventional transport Tunability Contacts
• ‘Neo’ electronics possibilities enabled by 2D crystals
• Challenges moving forward
25 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Effective masses, Mobilities
• In-plane effective masses are ‘large’ DOS is high, mobility is low (~few 100’s cm2/V.s) • Electron and hole effective masses are ‘similar’ • Guo group (Florida).
26 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Effective masses, Mobilities of MoS2
TMD semiconductors to date (expt)
• Experimental mobilities are VERY LOW! • What are the fundamental limits of transport and mobility of TMD semiconductors?
27 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Current drives in the ballistic limit: Projected
• What is lost in transport is gained back in electrostatics: high current drives in scaled limits. • Guo group (Florida).
pMOS nMOS
28 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Outline
• Charge-based electronics Conventional Neo
• 2D Crystals Electrostatics Scaling Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures Dielectrics Inversion Transport Effective masses, conventional transport Tunability Contacts
• ‘Neo’ electronics possibilities enabled by 2D crystals
• Challenges moving forward
29 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Scattering and Mobility limits in Monolayer MoS2
T=300 K
ns=1013 cm-2
m ~4200cm2 Vs
N I 1011cm-2( )
Phonon
scattering
Charged
impurity
scattering
109
1010
1011
1012
1013
101
102
103
104
23.5
ZrO2/HfO
2
13.5
SiO2/HfO
2
10.8AlN/Al
2O
3
2.5
5.1BN/BN
Mo
bil
ity
(c
m2/V
s)
Impurity density (cm-2)
Air/Air
SiO2/Air
1
e
Currently reported electron mobilities are
limited by Ionized impurity scattering
Very low impurity
densities:
intrinsic/remote
phonon scattering
determine the highest
attainable mobilities.
Intrinsic mobility
accessible in
CLEAN,
SUSPENDED layers
High-κ gate dielectrics
can increase the electron
mobility only for samples
infected with very high
impurity densities
30 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Outline
• Charge-based electronics Conventional Neo
• 2D Crystals Electrostatics Scaling Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures Dielectrics Inversion Transport Effective masses, conventional transport Tunability Contacts
• ‘Neo’ electronics possibilities enabled by 2D crystals
• Challenges moving forward
31 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Outline
• Charge-based electronics Conventional Neo
• 2D Crystals Electrostatics Scaling Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures Dielectrics Inversion Transport Effective masses, conventional transport Tunability Contacts
• ‘Neo’ electronics possibilities enabled by 2D crystals
• Challenges moving forward
32 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Quasi-2D properties in a Wide-Bandgap ‘3D’ Crystal
• Ga2O3 devices demonstrated in 2012/2013 • There are crystals ‘between’ 2D and 3D … quasi-2D? • A wholly unexplored arena for new high temperature & high-voltage logic devices
33 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Quasi-2D high-voltage transistors: on-chip power conditioning
Nanomembrane high-voltage transistors with Ga2O3
34 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
MBE growth of extreme-bandgap oxides
Initial MBE growths of Ga2O3 at Notre Dame
2e-8 5e-8 8e-8 1.1e-7
4.9 eV 4.9 eV No growth No growth
MBE Ga2O3
35 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Outline
• Charge-based electronics Conventional Neo
• 2D Crystals Electrostatics Scaling Bonds/Interfaces/Heterostructures Dielectrics Inversion Transport Effective masses, conventional transport Tunability Contacts
• ‘Neo’ electronics possibilities enabled by 2D crystals
• Challenges moving forward
36 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
2D Crystal Device Roadmap
We are
here today
37 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Materials challenge: TMD/layered semiconductors
Molecular Beam Epitaxy of 2D Crystal Heterostructures For precise DOPING & Heterostructures (Xing, Furdyna, Jena)
38 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
2D Crystal Electronics Benchmarking
39 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Herbert Kroemer’s message
40 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
Surprises in d-orbitals: Superconductivity
Case in point: Superconductivity in
MoS2 FETs: d-orbital effects show up!!
41 Debdeep Jena ([email protected]), University of Notre Dame
The ‘Golden Pavilion’ temple in Kyoto