Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation...
-
Upload
barbara-gordon -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation...
![Page 1: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Electron Beams:Physical Principles and Dosimetry
Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D.
Department of Radiation Physics
UT M.D. Anderson Cancer [email protected]
Medical Physics III: Spring 2010
![Page 2: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Physical aspects
![Page 3: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Electron Interactions
Inelastic collisions
1. atomic electrons (ionization & excitation)
2. nuclei (bremsstrahlung)
Elastic collisions
1. w/ atomic electrons
2. w/ nuclei
![Page 4: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Electron Interactions
• Collisional (ionization and excitation)– Energy loss electron density (Z/A)
Radiation losses (bremsstrahlung)
– Energy loss Energy & Z2
![Page 5: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Electron Interactions– Mass Stopping Power (S/):
• Rate of energy loss (units: Mev-cm2/g)
• Collision losses (ionization and excitation) & radiation losses (bremsstrahlung):
ρdl
dΕ ρ
S
rct )ρS( )ρ
S( ) ρS(
![Page 6: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Electron Interactions
– Restricted Mass Stopping Power (L/:
• AKA LET (linear energy transfer) or energy loss per
unit path length (for local absorption not radiated
away)
ρdldE
ρL
Δ
E
![Page 7: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Electron interactionsAbsorbed dose
• Fluence
• Dose
dE (E) ρ
L (E)
E D
0
Δ
dE
EdE
)(
![Page 8: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Electron beam characteristics• Rapid rise to 100%
• Region of uniform dose (proximal 90% to distal 90%)
• Rapid dose fall-off
• High surface dose
• Clinically useful range 5-6 cm depth
![Page 9: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Electron Energy Specification• (the average energy of the spectrum)
• (most probable energy @ surface)
• (average energy at depth z)
![Page 10: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
From: Khan
Electron Energy Specification
• Energy specification:– R50 - depth of the 50%
dose
– Rp - maximum range of electrons
![Page 11: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Electron Energy Specification
– Average Energy (E0):
– Most Probable Energy (Ep0):
– Energy (Ez) at depth z
500 332 ) R. (Ε
2002509812200, pp R.R.. E p
MDACC 21EX
AAPM TG-25 Med Phys 18(1), 73-109 (1991))Rz- (E E
pz 10
![Page 12: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Determination of Absorbed Dose• Calibration in water with ion chambers
– ADCL-calibrated system• Cylindrical-chamber reference point located
upstream of the chamber center by 0.5 rcav
– Reference conditions 100 cm SSD for a 1010 cm2 field
– Formalism:
N CowD
60
,kM D QQw
1.06.0 50 Rd ref
![Page 13: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Depth-Dose DistributionDose is calculated from ionization
measurements:
• M is ionization
• is the ratio of water-to-air mean restricted stopping powers
• is the ratio of water-to-air fluence
• Prepl is a chamber replacement correction
100
}{
}{
%max
numerator
Pρ
LM
D
repl
W
air
W
airW
W
airρ
L
W
air
![Page 14: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Clinical aspects and dosimetry
![Page 15: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Characteristics of clinical electron beams
X-Ray Contamination
Surface
DoseDepth of
80% Dose
Depth of 50 % dose
Depth of 90% Dose
![Page 16: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Characteristics of Clinical Electron Beams
• Surface Dose:– Surface dose increases with increasing electron energy
From: Khan
![Page 17: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Characteristics of Clinical Electron Beams
• Depth of the 80% Dose:– Equal to approximately Enom/2.8 :
– Depth of 90% is approximately Enom/3.2
MDACC 21EX
![Page 18: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Characteristics of clinical electron beams
• Practical Range:– Equal to approximately 1/2 nominal energy:
– Energy loss is about 2 MeV / cm
MDACC 21EX
![Page 19: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Characteristics of clinical electron beams
• X-Ray Contamination:– Increases with energy:
– Varies with accelerator design
– Defined as RP+2 cm
MDACC 21EX
![Page 20: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Characteristics of clinical electron beams
• Accelerator design variations– Penumbra– X-ray Contamination
From: Tapley
![Page 21: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Characteristics of clinical electron beams
• Penumbral Effects:
– Low energies show expansion of isodose values
– High energies show constriction of high isodose values with bowing of low values.
![Page 22: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Electron Beam DosimetryIsodoses (6 MeV)
![Page 23: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Electron Beam DosimetryIsodoses (20 MeV)
![Page 24: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Electron Beam DosimetryPDD- effect of field size (6 MeV)
![Page 25: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Electron Beam DosimetryPDD- effect of field size (20 MeV)
![Page 26: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Electron Beam DosimetryBeam abutment
![Page 27: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Electron Beam DosimetryBeam abutment- electrons (6 & 20 MeV)
![Page 28: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Electron Beam DosimetryBeam abutment- electrons (6 & 12 MeV)
![Page 29: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Electron Beam DosimetryBeam abutment- electrons
![Page 30: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Electron Beam DosimetryBeam abutment- photon & electron (6 MeV & 6 MV)
![Page 31: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Electron Beam DosimetryBeam abutment- photon & electron (6 MeV & 18 MV)
![Page 32: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Electron Beam DosimetryBeam abutment- photon & electron (IMC & tangents)
![Page 33: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Electron Beam Dosimetry• Obliquity Effects
– Oblique incidence results in pdd shifts
From: Khan
![Page 34: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Electron Beam DosimetryObliquity effects
![Page 35: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Electron Beam Dosimetry• Field Shaping:
– Lead and/or Cerrobend is normally used– Thickness should be sufficient to stop electrons:
12E 0 t
t = mm PbE0 = Nom E (MeV)
![Page 36: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Electron Beam Dosimetry• Contour Irregularities:
– Sharp contour irregularities result in hot and cold spots
• Bolus:– Place as close to skin as
possible
– Use tissue-equivalent material
– Bevel bolus to smooth sharp edges
From: Khan
![Page 37: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Electron Beam Dosimetry
• Effects of inhomogeneities:– CET - coefficient of equivalent
thickness– The CET of a material is
approximately equal to its electron density relative to water
From: Khan
CET)- (1 z- d deff
![Page 38: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Electron Beam Dosimetry
• CET:– Sample calculation CET)- (1 z- d deff
1 cm
cm 2.25 0.25)- (1 1- 3 deff
cm 3.65 1.65)- (1 1- 3 deff
For Lung:
For Bone:
3 cm
![Page 39: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Electron Beam Dosimetry• Internal
Shielding:– Used to protect
tissues beyond treatment volume
– Backscattered electrons produce “dose enhancement”
From: Khan (Note E in MeV)
A dose enhancement of about 50% could be expected in a 6-MeV electron beam
![Page 40: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Electron Beam Dosimetry• Internal Shielding:
– Reduce the intensity of backscatter by introducing a tissue-equivalent absorber upstream from the shield
Electron energy at the scatterer
From: Khan
![Page 41: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Electron BeamMonitor-Unit Calculations
• Electron-beam monitor units (MU) are normally calculated to a point at dmax along the central axis
• A dose DRx that is prescribed to a point other than dmax, can be related to the dmax dose Ddmax through the precription isodose level %D:
%D
DD Rxdmax
![Page 42: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Electron BeamMonitor-Unit Calculations
• The MU setting (MU) that is necessary to deliver a dose Ddmax is a function of the electron beam’s “output” (in cGy per MU) at the calculation point:
• Here OFS,SSD is the dose output as a function of field size (FS) and distance (SSD)
SSDFS,
dmaxO
DMU
![Page 43: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Electron BeamMonitor-Unit Calculations
• For an electron beam calibrated such that 1 MU = 1 cGy at 100 cm SSD for a 1010 field at dmax:
Calibrated output for a 10X10 cm field at 100
cm SSD
Output factor for field size FS relative to field
size 10X10
Distance-correction factor for distance SSD relative
to 100 cm SSD
Electron-beam output for a field size FS at a distance SSD
)(F)(OF)(OO SSDFS10,100SSDFS,
![Page 44: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Monitor-Unit Calculations
• Field-Size Corrections OFFS:– Field-size corrections generally account for the aperture produced by two
devices:• Cones or Applicators, and Customized Inserts
– The field-size dependent output factor OFFS can then be thought to consist of
cone and insert output factors, OFCS and OFIS:
![Page 45: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Monitor-Unit Calculations• Field-Size Corrections - OFCS, IS :
– When used separately, cone factors, OFCS, are normalized to the 1010 (or 1515) cone, and insert factors, OFIS, are normalized to the open cone into which inserts are placed
– Alternatively, they can be combined into a single factor, OFCS, IS , that is
normalized to the open 1010 (or to the 1515) cone :
ISCSISCSFS OFOFOFOF ,
![Page 46: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Monitor-Unit Calculations• Field-Size Corrections - OFLW :
– For rectangular fields, the field-size dependent output factor, OFFS, is determined from square-field output factors using the “square root method”. Thus, for a rectangular field LW:
– For example, the 412 output factor OF412 is the square-root of the product of the 44 output
factor, OF44, and the 1212 output factor, OF1212
WxWLxLLxW OFOFOF
![Page 47: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Monitor-Unit Calculations
• Distance (SSD) Corrections FSSD:– The variation of electron-beam output with distance does
not follow a simple conventional inverse-square relationship
• Due to attenuation and scattering in air and in beam collimation and shaping devices
– Distance corrections take two forms:• Use of an “effective SSD” that can be used in an inverse-square
fashion
• Use of an “air-gap factor” that can be used in addition to a conventional inverse-square factor
![Page 48: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Monitor-Unit Calculations• Distance Corrections - SSDeff:
– Assuming that an inverse-square relationship exists in which a reduced distance to a “virtual” source of electrons
exists, then the distance correction, FSSD is:
• where SSDeff is the effective (or virtual) SSD and g is the distance (gap) between the “nominal” SSD (100 cm) and the actual SSD; dm is
the dmax depth
2
gdSSD
dSSDISFF
m
meffSSDSSD
eff
EFF
![Page 49: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Monitor-Unit Calculations• Distance Corrections - SSDeff :
– The “effective SSD” is a virtual distance that is utilized so that an inverse-square approximation can be used
• Effective SSDs vary with energy and field size as well as with electron collimation design
![Page 50: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Monitor-Unit Calculations• Distance Corrections - fair :
– An alternative method of applying distance corrections utilizes a conventional inverse-square correction and an air gap factor, fair , that accounts for the further reduction in output that is unaccounted-for by the inverse-square correction alone:
• SSDnom is the nominal (100 cm) SSD
airmnom
mnomgSSDSSD f
gdSSD
dSSDISFF nom
2
![Page 51: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Monitor-Unit Calculations
• Distance Corrections - fair:
– fair also varies with energy and field size (it is derived from the same data set that can be used to also determine SSDeff)
– For rectangular fields, as with any electron field-size correction, the square-root method is used:
WxWLxLLxW airairair fff
![Page 52: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Monitor-Unit Calculations• Use of Bolus:
– When bolus is used, the depth-dose curve shifts “upstream” by a distance equal to the bolus thickness (e.g. if 1 cm bolus is used, the depth of dmax shifts by a distance of 1 cm toward the skin surface)
– The output at this shorter distance is:
• where b is the bolus thickness in cm, and SSD is the nominal SSD
2, bdSSDdSSDOO
mSSDbSSD m
![Page 53: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Electron Monitor-Unit Calculations - Sample Problems
![Page 54: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Electron Monitor-Unit Calculations - Sample Problems
3 . R o u g h l y , w h a t i s t h e e n e r g y o f a 1 2 M e V e l e c t r o nb e a m a t a d e p t h o f 5 c m ?
MeVEEE lostinitialleft 21012
MeVdcmMevE cmlost 1052/2
![Page 55: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Electron Monitor-Unit Calculations - Sample Problems
![Page 56: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Electron Monitor-Unit Calculations - Sample Problems
5 . W h a t i s t h e m o n i t o r - u n i t s e t t i n g n e c e s s a r y t o d e l i v e ra d o s e o f 2 0 0 c G y p e r f r a c t i o n t o d m a x u s i n g 9 M e Ve l e c t r o n s , 6 x 1 0 f i e l d i n a 1 0 x 1 0 c o n e , a t 1 0 0 c m S S D ?
WxWLxLLxW OFOFOF 002.10.1003.1101066106 xxx OFOFOF
2006.199200
1.0(1.002)(1.0)UM
![Page 57: Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry Kent A. Gifford, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center kagifford@mdanderson.org.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022103023/56649d9d5503460f94a86371/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Electron MU Sample Problems6 . W h a t i s t h e m o n i t o r - u n i t s e t t i n g n e c e s s a r y t o d e l i v e r ad o s e o f 2 0 0 c G y p e r f r a c t i o n t o t h e 9 0 % i s o d o s e u s i n g 9M e V e l e c t r o n s , 6 x 1 0 f i e l d i n a 1 5 x 1 5 c o n e , a t 1 0 5 c m S S D ?
airmnom
mnomgSSDSSD f
gdSSD
dSSDISFF nom
2
892.0981.0909.0984.0978.053.2100
3.21002
SSDF
0.1003.1997.010106615
106 xxCone
x OFOFOF
2491.249
892.0
2.222
892.00.10.1
10090200
MU