Electromagnetics for the Investigation of Landfills: …...Electromagnetics for the Investigation of...
Transcript of Electromagnetics for the Investigation of Landfills: …...Electromagnetics for the Investigation of...
Electromagnetics for the
Investigation of Landfills: Three
(Short) Case Studies from the
Valley of Mexico
Matthias Bücker
University of Bonn (Germany) and
TU-Wien (Austria)
2017 DISC lab | Mexico City
Study sites in the Valley of Mexico
1. Tepexpan
- DC resistivity and TDEM
- Conductive waste in resistive volcanic rock
2. New International Airport
- DC resistivity and TDEM
- Conductive waste over saline clay
3. Prados de la Montaña
- Spectral induced polarization
- Conductive, chargeable waste
Background map: INEGI
1. Tepexpan (State of Mexico)
1. Tepexpan
Setup
- Abandoned landfill in pyroclastic rock (tuff,
scoria) and basalts
Properties
- Conductive waste (< 20 Ωm)
- Resistive host rock (> 100 Ωm)
(Actual) Objective
- Assess geometry of scoria and basalt
units for mining purposes
1. Tepexpan (State of Mexico)
TEP19TEP20
Landfill
BasaltTuff/
Scoria
TuffTuff
Tuff (toba)
Scoria (tezontle)
Tuff
TDEM: TEP20
Landfill
Tuff/
Scoria
Tuff
TDEM: TEP19
Tuff
Basalt/
Scoria
WE
DCR: Line TP3
Geological setting
Landfill
Survey
- DCR (10 m spacing, ~ 1 km line length)
- TDEM (50 m x 50 m loop)
Processing
- DCR: 2D inversion (EarthImager)
- TDEM: 1D inversion (WinGLink)
Summary
- Identified abandoned landfill and possible leachate
plume by low resistivity values from DCR and TDEM.
Pit
Leachate
plume?
2. New International Airport (State of Mexico)
2. New International Airport
Setup
- Abandoned landfill on top saline clay (former lake Texcoco)
Properties
- Conductive waste (~ 1 Ωm)
- Even more conductive clay (<< 1 Ωm)
Objective
- Estimate thickness (and volume) of waste deposits
N
0+000
1+4001+400
0+000
0+470
0+000
0+470
0+000
0+470
0+000
0+470
0+000
0+705
0+000
0+000
0+2000+000
0+000
0+000
0+000
0+200
0+200
0+200
0+200
0+000
0+000
0+000
1+000
1+000
1+000
Profile
6
0.20.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
0.810.94 0.88 0.87 0.95 0.95
1.21.01 1.19
0.94 0.94 0.96
NAICM landfill | Profile 6
TDEM 0+385 m
0.95
Ωm
0.2
Ωm
0.96
Ωm
0+
33
5 m
0+
34
5 m
0+
35
5 m
0+
36
5 m
0+
37
5 m
0+
38
5 m
Debris
Saline clay
NS
Survey
- DCR (Ares, 3 m spacing)
- TDEM (TerraTEM, single loop, 10 m x 10
m loop)
Processing
- DCR: 2D inversion (Res2DInv)
- TDEM: 1D (WinGLink)
Summary
- Identified waste/debris layer by
(relatively high resistivity)
- Excellent agreement of DCR and TDEM
(three-layer inversion) results
N
0+000
1+4001+400
0+000
0+470
0+000
0+470
0+000
0+470
0+000
0+470
0+000
0+705
0+000
0+000
0+2000+000
0+000
0+000
0+000
0+200
0+200
0+200
0+200
0+000
0+000
0+000
1+000
1+000
1+000
NAICM landfill | Profil 13
Línea 13
L13-500
L13-750
0+
62
0 m
0+
67
0 m
0+
71
0 m
WE
0+
63
0 m
0+
64
0 m
0+
65
0 m
0+
66
0 m
0+
68
0 m
0+
69
0 m
0+
70
0 m
0+
72
0 m
0+
730 m
0+
74
0 m
0+
75
0 m
0+
76
0 m
0+
77
0 m
0+
78
0 m
0+
79
0 m
0+
80
0 m
0+
81
0 m
0+
82
0 m
1.9 2.15 1.74 1.95 1.91.09
1.01.22 1.27 1.01 1.1
0.20.230.20.2channel
3. Prados de la Montaña, Mexico City
3. Prados de la Montaña landfill
Setup
- Closed landfill in volcanic rocks (tuff, pyroclastic
sediments)
Properties
- Conductive (<< 10 Ωm) and chargeable (up to 50
mrad) waste
- More resistive (>> 100 Ωm) and non-chargeable
host rock
Objective
- Determine geometry of waste deposits
3. Prados de la Montaña
Electrodes
IP5 outside
of landfill
Lower limit
of the
landfill
Survey
- DCR (Syscal Pro Switch, Dipole-
dipole, 6-7 m spacing, 48 electrodes)
Processing
- DCR: 2D inversion (CRTomo)
Summary DCR
- Waste only conductive, where
saturated with leachate?
- Leachate plume beneath actual
landfill?
3. Prados de la Montaña
1 Hz
2 Hz
4 Hz
8 Hz
0.5 Hz
Survey
- SIP (GDP32ii, Dipole-dipole,
8 m spacing, 30 electrodes)
Processing
- SIP: 2D inversion (CRTomo
by Andreas Kemna, Bonn)
Summary SIP
- Phase correlates better with known geometrical limits of landfill
- Lateral heterogeneities might give a hint to waste composition
- Open question: What information does the spectral variation contain?
(-> composition, saturation, fluid chemistry, particle sizes)?
Thanks to…
~ 1750 Dumpsites located in
Santa María la Ribera
Historic dumpsite (DF)
Historic dumsite (EdoMex)
19th century
20th century (1st half)
1924 Santa Cruz Meyehualco
1938 Dumpsites at the
Monumento a la Raza and in
Tacubaya, Dos Ríos,
Magdalena Mixhuca
Monumento a la Raza
Tacubaya
Dos RiosSanta Cruz Meyehualco
Magdalena Mixhuca
Historic dumpsite (DF)
Historic dumsite (EdoMex)
1958 Santa Fe
1983 Closure of Santa Cruz
Meyehualco causes the
opening of dumpsites San
Lorenzo Tezonco, Tlalpan,
Milpa Alta, Cerro de la Estrella,
Tarango,, Santa Catarina,
Bordo de Xochiaca, Tlahuác,
San Mateo Nopala,
Cuautepec.
1985 Bordo Poniente
1985-87 Santa Catarina,
Prados de la Montaña
Santa Cruz MeyehualcoSanta Fe
Tlalpan
Milpa Alta
San Lorenzo
Tezonco
Cerro de
la Estrella
Santa Catarina
Bordo Poniente
Prados de
la Montaña
Tarango
San Mateo
Nopala
Cuautepec
Tlahuác
20th century (2nd half)
Historic dumpsite (DF)
Historic dumsite (EdoMex)
References
Historic development of dumsites in Mexico City
Deffis Caso, Armando, 1994. La basura es la solución. 1ra Edición,
México D.F., Editorial Árbol
Jiménez, Blanca Elena, 2001. La contaminación ambiental en
México: Causas, efectos y tecnología apropiada. Colegio de
ingenieros ambientales de México, A.C. Instituto de Ingeniería
de la UNAM y FEMISCA, México, Editorial Limusa
Mora Reyes, J. A., 2004. El problema de la basura en la Ciudad de
México. Fundación de estudios urbanos y metropolitanos.