Electricity Markets Regulation - Lesson 7 - Quality Of Supply Regulation
-
Upload
leonardo-energy -
Category
Technology
-
view
2.836 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Electricity Markets Regulation - Lesson 7 - Quality Of Supply Regulation
Experience you can trust.http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
Training on Regulation
A webinar for the European Copper Institute
Webinar 7: Quality of Supply Regulation
Dr. Konstantin Petrov / Dr. Daniel Grote
22.1.2010
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 2
Agenda
4. Regulatory quality control
3. Relevance of quality regulation
b) Technical quality
a) Reliability
2. Quality measurement
c) Commercial quality
5. Design of incentive schemes for quality
6. Outage cost
a) Indirect controls
1. Quality definition
c) Incentive schemes
b) Minimum standards
7. International examples
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 3
1. Quality definition
Customer expectations
Customers have expectations from their electricity supplier
Reliable supply (low frequency of
interruptions)
Timely and reliable
information in case of a problem
Quick restoration time
Quick response to complaints
Good technical quality
(safe operation of electrical
equipment and appliances)
Individual expectations of customers do vary significantly
(e.g. depending on individual usage of electricity and the quality levels experienced in the past)
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 4
1. Quality definition
Dimensions of quality
Continuity of Supply
Technical Quality
Commercial Quality
– Reliability of electricity supply
– Performance indicators (number and frequency of interruptions)
– Physical properties of electricity
– Performance indicators (voltage variation, dips, flickers)
– Customer service quality
– Performance indicators (complaints from consumers, response time to consumer complaints, appointments with consumers)
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 5
2. Quality measurement
Reliability indicators (absolute numbers)
Number of
interruptions
Number of
customers
affected
Duration
(cumulative)
Unsupplied
energy
Total number of times during a year that supply to one or more customers
was interrupted
Number of customers affected
for each consecutive
outage in that year
(some customers might experience
more than one outage in a year)
Aggregated time that customers
who have experienced an
outage have actually been
interrupted in the year (expressed in minutes or hours)
Aggregated energy not supplied to
customers during the year as a result of the interruptions (expressed in kWh
or MWh)
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 6
2. Quality measurement
Reliability indicators (normalised indicators)
System Average
Interruption Frequency
Index (SAIFI)
System Average
Interruption Duration
Index (SAIDI )
Customer Average
Interruption Duration
Index (CAIDI)
Average Energy Not Supplied (AENS)
average number of outages per
customer
(probability of experiencing a power outage)
average time of interruption per
customer
average time required to restore
service to an interrupted customer
average amount of energy not supplied per
customer because of interruptions
t
ii
N
NSAIFI
a
ii
N
NCAIFI
t
iii
N
NrSAIDI
t
iii
N
PrAENS
ri: Restoration time for interruption event i
Pi: Interrupted Power for interruption i Ni: Number of interrupted customers for interruption i
Nt: Total number of customers served
Na: Number of customers affected by at least one outage
Customer Average
Interruption Frequency
Index (CAIFI)
average number of interruptions for a customer who experienced at
least one interruption
ii
iii
N
NrCAIDI
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
2. Quality measurement
Reliability indicators (normalised indicators) – Potential problems
A reliance on normalised reliability indicators in isolation might lead to several problems
SAIDI/SAIFI
– Reductions in SAIDI/SAIFI are proportional to the number of affected customers
reliability investments based on SAIDI/SAIFI that affect large numbers of customers
(e.g. in urban areas) are more likely to be carried out (even though they already
experience satisfactory reliability levels) than those affecting only small numbers of
customers
CAIDI
– When the firm reduces the number of small and easy to fix interruptions, the remaining
interruptions will be those taking longer to repair
CAIDI will go up even though reliability has actually been improved
Indicators are interdependent on each other:
SAIDI = SAIFI * CAIDI or CAIDI = SAIDI/SAIFI
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 8
2. Quality measurement
Technical quality
Stability and safety of the whole power system as well as the functioning of electrical equipment and appliances depend on technical parameters
Frequency stability Voltage stability Harmonics
voltage fluctuation (flickers)
long-term voltage instability:
1 – 60 minutes(over- / under- voltage)
short-term / transient voltage instability:
0 – 30 seconds(dips, swells and short
interruptions)
– Symmetry of the three phases and shape of the voltage wave
– Standard LV and MV distortion factor ≤ 8%
– HV distortion factor ≤ 3%
– For low voltage between 100 V and 250 V, most countries 220-230V
– European standard: 230V +/- 10%
– USA standard: 120V +/- 5%
– Normal frequency value: 50 Hz
– North- and parts of South America: 60 Hz
– Standard range +/- 0.5 Hz
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 9
2. Quality measurement
Commercial quality indicators
Time and QualityQuality of
Information
Customer Satisfaction Indicators
– Estimation of charges
– Notification of customers about planned interruptions
– Establishment of new connection
– Restoration of supply
– Change of meters
– Meeting arrangements
– Reaction in case of meter reading problems
– Answering written complaints
– Answering phone calls
– Response to invoicing questions
– Number of customer complaints lodged to the regulator
– Customer satisfaction indices via surveys
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 10
3. Relevance of quality regulation
Interdependencies between price and quality
Customer value of electricity consumption depends on both price and quality
Competitive markets produce different price-quality levels, customers select product that
fits their quality preferences, companies that offer inappropriate quality lose customers
Natural monopoly companies do not face such a threat of customer losses and might
therefore offer low quality
Under price- or revenue cap regulation companies might cut costs und reduce quality
levels
Without additional quality regulation, lower prices might come at the expense of lower
quality levels
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 11
4. Regulatory quality control
Groups of regulatory quality measures
Incentive Schemes Indirect quality controlsMinimum Performance
Standards
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 12
4. Regulatory quality control
Indirect controls put external pressure on network companies to pay sufficient
attention to network quality (used by many regulators)
Indirect controls
Performance publication Resolution of conflicts
– Companies required to
publish information about
(trends in) own
performance or relative to
other companies
– “Name and blame”
– Publication in annual
reports, regulatory
publications, or on the
firm’s or regulator’s website
– Relatively simple to implement and limited regulatory involvement
– Effectiveness is questionable
– Brand value may matter
– Consumer complaint bodies
(e.g. hotlines)
– Establishment of an
Ombudsman
– Participation of consumers
in the advisory or
supervisory boards of the
firm
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 13
4. Regulatory quality control
Define minimum levels (floor) for certain performance aspects
Violation of standard leads to a fine or tariff rebate
Two types of standards
– Overall standards: Network quality at system level, e.g. “percentage of customers with
an outage”
– Individual standards: Limits to the level of performance delivered to individual
customers, e.g. limit the number or duration of outages for any customer
Can provide strong incentives for firms to deliver adequate quality levels
Impose a discrete relation between performance and price (achieve target or not),
companies might therefore provide minimum level only
Minimum standards
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 14
4. Regulatory quality control
Can be considered as an extension of a standard
Impose a continuous relation between price and quality
Each performance level results in a financial incentive, depending on the difference
between the actual performance level and a predefined target
Performance below target results in financial penalty
Performance above target results in financial reward
Inclusion in the price- or revenue-cap formula possible
– Reward / penalty increases / decreases the allowed revenue
Various mathematical specifications of incentive function
Typical indicators for quality incentive schemes
– SAIDI, SAIFI, CAIDI, ENS
• Typical requirements for quality indicators
• Important to customers
• Can be influenced by the company
• Can be measured by the regulator (feasibility)
Incentive schemes
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 15
5. Design of incentive schemes for quality
Quality targets can be based on
Individual historic levels
On comparative basis using the performance of other regulated companies
Parameters can be determined on system level, for individual or groups of customers
Quality targets can be differentiated by
– Network operators
– Voltage level
– Geographical regions (rural and urban areas) reflecting customer density
– Warning notice (planned or unplanned)
– Reasons (force majeuere, third party, own fault)
– Customer type (household, commercial, industry)
Parameters
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 16
5. Design of incentive schemes for quality
Incentive function – Shape
Penalty
Reward
Qualityhighlow
continuous
capped
dead band
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 17
5. Design of incentive schemes for quality
Dead bands
– Define a tolerance range within which quality is allowed to vary
– If quality is lower than the target range penalty
– If quality is higher than the target range reward
Caps and floors
– Define an upper limit of rewards and penalties that would be charged or given to
companies that exceed or fail to reach a specific quality level
Dead bands and caps and floors can be jointly applied
Incentive function – Dead bands and caps and floors
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 18
6. Outage cost
Quality changes as a function of costs only– Higher quality requires more costs (at the margin)
Customers’ quality utility is a function of quality level– Higher quality provides more benefits (at the margin)
Theoretically, quality is optimal if:– Marginal Quality Costs = Marginal Quality Benefits
Trade-off between cost and quality
Reliability costs
Reliability
Costs
Outage costs
Total Social Costs
Optimum
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 19
6. Outage cost
Duration of the interruption
Perceived reliability level
– The higher the reliability level, the more severe the impact of an interruption will be
– Perceptions do vary significantly for different customers and different countries
Timing (e.g. time of the day)
Advance notice (planned or unplanned outages)
– Properly notified planned interruptions are generally rated as less severe by affected
users
Nature of customer activities and consumer dependency
– Some customers may be more dependent than others (ability to shift load or abstain
from usage, e.g. hospitals are more vulnerable for an interruption than a residential
consumer)
Factors influencing the costs of an outage
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 20
6. Outage cost
Different measurement techniques:
– Indirect method
Proxies (Gross National Product)
Consumer surplus methods (electricity demand curves)
Costs of backup power (costs of preventing interruptions)
– Direct method
Ex post surveys (collect information after blackout)
Ex ante surveys – direct cost (ask consumers their direct costs)
Ex ante surveys – econometrics (willingness to pay for higher reliability or
willingness to accept lower reliability)
Outage costs measurement
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 21
7. International examples
Development of unplanned interruptions in Europe
Unplanned interruptions excluding exceptional events, minutes lost per year
Source: 4th CEER benchmarking report on quality of electricity supply 2008
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 22
7. International examples
Application of quality regulation in some European countries
Incentive scheme
Quality indicator
Quality target
Italy Continuous SAIDIAnnual
improvement of 16%
HungaryDiscrete with
capsSAIFI and SAIDI
Annual improvement of
16%
Netherlands Continuous SAIDIAnnual average improvement of
industry
Norway Continuous ENSHistoric
performance
Great BritainContinuous with
caps
Customer Interruption and
Minutes Lost
Historic performance
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 23
7. International examples
Application of commercial quality standards in Europe
Source: 4th CEER benchmarking report on quality of electricity supply 2008
AutomaticUpon customer’s
requestVoluntary or
bilateral agreements
Austria X
Cyprus X
Czech Republic X
Hungary X X
Italy X
Portugal X
Slovenia X (proposal)
Spain X X
UK X
Compensations due if commercial quality guaranteed standards are not fulfilled
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 24
7. International examples
Application of quality regulation in UK
Ofgem monitors and controls the following aspects of quality of supply
– Reliability measured by interruptions
– Quality of service measured by customer satisfaction
– Environmental protection
DSOs required to carry out quarterly postal customer surveys on
– customers whose electricity supply has been subject to an unplanned interruption and
– customers who have experienced a planned interruption
Questions addressed in the surveys cover
– the duration of the interruption and the advanced notification of planned interruptions
– communication from the DSO
– the skill and professionalism of the people who carried out the work and the overall
quality of the work
If performance standards are not met by DSO penalty payments to single customers arise
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
Reporting code
Service Performance Level Penalty Payment
GS1 Respond to failure of distributors fuse(Regulation 10)
All DNOs to respond within 3 hours on a working day (at least) 7 am to 7 pm, and within 4 hours on other days between (at least) 9 am to 5 pm, otherwise a payment must be made
£20 for domestic and non-domestic customers
GS2* Supply restoration: normal conditions(Regulation 5)
Supply must be restored within 18 hours, otherwise a payment must be made
£50 for domestic customers and £100 for non-domestic customers, plus £25 for each further 12 hours
GS2A* Supply restoration: multiple interruptions(Regulation 9)
If four or more interruptions each lasting 3 or more hours occur in any single year (1 April – 31 March), a payment must be made
£50 for domestic and non-domestic customers
GS3 Estimate of charges for connection(Regulation 11)
5 working days for simple work and 15 working days for significant work, otherwise a payment must be made
£40 for domestic and non-domestic customers
GS4* Notice of planned interruption to supply(Regulation 12)
Customers must be given at least 2 days notice, otherwise a payment must be made
£20 for domestic and non-domestic customers
GS5 Investigation of voltage complaints(Regulation 13)
Visit customer’s premises within 7 working days or dispatch an explanation of the probable reason for the complaint within 5 working days, otherwise a payment must be made
£20 for domestic and non-domestic customers
GS8 Making and keeping appointments(Regulation 17)
Companies must offer and keep a timed appointment or offer and keep a timed appointment where requested by the customer, otherwise a payment must be made
£20 for domestic and non-domestic customers
GS9 Payments owed under the standards(Regulation 19)
Payment to be made within 10 working days, otherwise a payment must be made
£20 for domestic and non-domestic customers
22/01/2010 25
7. International examplesApplication of quality regulation in UK – Guaranteed Standards of Performance
* Customers need to claim under these standards, for the remaining standards payments are automatic
Source: Ofgem, Table of Guaranteed Standards
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 26
7. International examples
Application of quality regulation in UK – Incentive Scheme
2008/09 Customer Interruptions (per 100 customers) as a Percentage of Respective 2008/09 Targets
DNO 2008/09 Target Performance Performance / Target (%)
CN West 104.6 92.8 89
CN East 76.7 68.5 89
ENW 57.1 48.3 85
CE NEDL 74.5 64.2 86
CE YEDL 68.5 76.4 112
WPD S Wales 95.3 66.1 69
WPD S West 84.5 58.4 69
EDFE LPN 36.2 28.7 79
EDFE SPN 84.5 82.7 98
EDFE EPN 85.7 84.8 99
SP Distribution 60.8 55.7 92
SP Manweb 46.7 49.3 106
SSE Hydro 95.2 75.8 80
SSE Southern 88.3 64.3 73
GB average 66.6
Source: Ofgem, 2008 / 2009 Electricity Distribution Quality of Service Data Tables
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 27
7. International examples
Application of quality regulation in Italy
Source: Autorità per l'energia elettrica e il gas
Development of quality regulation
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
22/01/2010 28
7. International examples
Application of quality regulation in Italy
Source: Autorità per l'energia elettrica e il gas
Quality levels versus customer satisfaction
Experience you can trust.http://www.leonardo-energy.org/training-module-electricity-market-regulation-session-7
End of Webinar 7
KEMA Consulting GmbH
Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 8, 53113 Bonn
Tel. +49 (228) 44 690 00Fax +49 (228) 44 690 99
Dr. Konstantin Petrov
Managing Consultant
Mobil +49 173 515 1946 E-mail: [email protected]