Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and...

22
Electricity Electricity Generation Mix by US Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon University Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon University Advisor Scott Matthews Advisor Scott Matthews InLCA/LCM September 2003

Transcript of Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and...

Page 1: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

Electricity Generation Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Mix by US Industrial

SectorsSectors

Disaggregating Electricity Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Generation and Modeling

Interstate TransfersInterstate Transfers

Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon UniversityAdvisor Scott MatthewsAdvisor Scott Matthews

InLCA/LCM September 2003

Page 2: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 22

Why Disaggregate?Why Disaggregate? Primary contributor to environmental impact is Primary contributor to environmental impact is

electricity generationelectricity generation

Impacts by generation type varies a lotImpacts by generation type varies a lot– e.g. Hydro versus coale.g. Hydro versus coal

This variation should be reflected in LCA This variation should be reflected in LCA resultsresults

For example: Aluminum manufacturingFor example: Aluminum manufacturing– Industry sector has emission numbers reduced due Industry sector has emission numbers reduced due

to plants in WA, which has 80% hydroelectric to plants in WA, which has 80% hydroelectric generationgeneration

Page 3: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 33

Currently in LCACurrently in LCA

Use aggregate US generation mix to Use aggregate US generation mix to calculate emissions, GWP, etc.calculate emissions, GWP, etc.

Net Electricity Generation by Energy Source, 1999

SourceGeneration,

%

Coal 50.99%

Petroleum 3.22%

Gas 15.31%

Nuclear 19.72%

Hydroelectric

8.32%

Other 2.41%

Page 4: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 44

Disaggregate ResultsDisaggregate Results Rather than a single sector:Rather than a single sector:

““Electric services (Utilities)”Electric services (Utilities)”

Have multiple electricity sectors:Have multiple electricity sectors:““Electric services (Utilities, Coal)”Electric services (Utilities, Coal)”““Electric services (Utilities, Nuclear)”Electric services (Utilities, Nuclear)”etc.etc.

Each industrial sector would receive a Each industrial sector would receive a specific mix of these disaggregated specific mix of these disaggregated electricity sectorselectricity sectors

Page 5: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 55

Making It HappenMaking It Happen

Data is not readily availableData is not readily available– Need complete facility-level transaction data Need complete facility-level transaction data

for all US industrial sectorsfor all US industrial sectors– No central repository of this dataNo central repository of this data– Economic data not necessarily a good Economic data not necessarily a good

estimateestimate

Instead, assign a specific generation mix Instead, assign a specific generation mix to each industrial sector using:to each industrial sector using:

1.1. ““Locations” of industry sectors from BEALocations” of industry sectors from BEA

2.2. State generation mixes from DOEState generation mixes from DOE

Page 6: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 66

Sector Allocation to StatesSector Allocation to States

Need percentage of each industry sector Need percentage of each industry sector located in each statelocated in each state– Available using a tool developed at Carnegie Available using a tool developed at Carnegie

Mellon by Iavor Kostov and Scott MatthewsMellon by Iavor Kostov and Scott Matthews

Economic Census location data from BEA Economic Census location data from BEA used for placementused for placement– Then uses number of employees and Then uses number of employees and

shipments as measures of size and intensity to shipments as measures of size and intensity to weight various sectors in various statesweight various sectors in various states

Page 7: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 77

Include Interstate TradingInclude Interstate Trading Lots of electricity transfer in the United States, Lots of electricity transfer in the United States,

especially following deregulation in 1996especially following deregulation in 1996

Currently, interstate electricity transfer Currently, interstate electricity transfer ignored, but it’s a big part of the marketignored, but it’s a big part of the market– 30% of California power is imported30% of California power is imported– West Virginia exports 60% of theirsWest Virginia exports 60% of theirs

These numbers have a significant impact, so These numbers have a significant impact, so new generation mixes are created for each new generation mixes are created for each statestate

Page 8: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 88

Western US: Net Imports Western US: Net Imports (TWh)(TWh)

+2.7

-70.9

+2.8

+3.4 +14.6

-10.0

+10.7

+16.6 +10.8

-5.6

+26.9

Page 9: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 99

Model: Linear OptimizationModel: Linear Optimization

Using 2 large matrices (23 x 28), find out Using 2 large matrices (23 x 28), find out where imports likely came from by where imports likely came from by minimizing distance (hops) traveledminimizing distance (hops) traveled

Classic transportation/distribution cost Classic transportation/distribution cost minimization problemminimization problem

This still isn’t what is This still isn’t what is actuallyactually happening happening on the grid, but it’s a pretty good estimateon the grid, but it’s a pretty good estimate

Page 10: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 1010

State “Hops” for CaliforniaState “Hops” for California

1

0

1

23

2

2

12

3

3

3

3

4

4

4

4

1

Page 11: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 1111

CA

CO

C T

DC

DE

FL

GA

IA

I D

I L

LA

MA

MD

ME

MI

MN

MO

MS

MX

NC

NJ

N V

NY

OH

OR

VA

V T

WI

AL 6 4 6 4 4 1 1 3 5 3 2 6 3 8 4 5 2 1 4 2 5 6 5 3 7 2 6 4

AR 4 2 6 4 5 3 2 2 4 2 1 6 4 8 4 3 1 1 2 2 6 4 5 3 2 3 6 3

AZ 1 1 9 6 7 6 5 3 2 4 3 9 6 11 5 4 3 4 1 5 8 1 8 5 3 5 9 4

CN 3 3 2 4 3 7 5 2 1 2 5 2 3 1 1 1 3 5 99 4 2 2 1 2 2 4 1 1

IN 7 4 4 3 3 4 3 2 5 1 4 4 3 6 1 3 2 3 5 3 3 6 3 1 6 2 4 2

KS 4 1 6 4 5 4 3 2 3 2 3 6 4 8 4 3 1 3 3 3 5 3 5 4 4 3 6 3

KY 6 3 4 2 3 3 2 2 5 1 3 4 2 6 2 3 1 2 4 2 3 5 3 1 6 1 4 2

MT 3 2 8 8 7 7 6 2 1 3 5 8 7 10 4 2 3 5 4 6 7 2 7 5 2 6 8 3

ND 4 3 8 8 7 7 6 2 2 3 6 8 7 10 3 1 3 5 5 6 6 3 6 4 3 6 8 2

NE 4 1 6 4 5 4 3 1 2 2 3 6 4 8 3 2 1 3 3 3 5 3 5 3 3 3 6 2

NH 12 8 2 5 4 9 7 7 9 6 8 1 4 1 5 7 6 7 8 6 3 10 2 4 11 5 1 6

NM 2 1 8 5 7 6 4 3 2 3 2 8 7 10 5 4 2 3 1 4 7 2 7 6 3 6 8 4

OK 3 3 6 5 6 4 3 2 3 2 2 6 5 8 4 3 1 2 2 3 7 3 5 3 4 4 6 3

PA 8 5 2 2 1 5 4 4 7 3 5 2 1 4 2 4 3 4 7 3 1 8 1 1 8 2 2 3

RI 11 8 1 5 4 9 8 7 9 6 8 1 4 3 5 7 6 8 10 6 3 10 2 4 10 5 2 7

SC 8 5 6 3 4 2 1 4 6 4 4 6 3 8 5 6 3 3 6 1 5 8 5 4 8 2 6 5

SD 4 2 7 6 6 6 5 1 2 2 5 7 6 9 3 1 2 4 4 5 6 3 6 4 3 5 7 3

TN 5 3 5 2 4 2 1 2 4 2 2 5 2 7 3 3 1 1 3 1 4 5 4 2 5 1 5 3

TX 3 2 7 7 6 4 4 3 4 3 1 7 4 9 5 4 2 2 1 3 6 3 7 5 4 3 7 4

UT 2 1 8 6 7 6 5 3 1 4 3 8 6 10 5 4 3 4 2 5 7 1 7 5 2 5 8 4

WA 2 3 10 8 8 7 7 4 1 5 5 10 8 12 6 4 4 6 3 7 8 2 9 6 1 7 10 5

WV 7 4 3 2 2 4 3 3 5 2 4 3 1 5 2 4 2 3 6 2 2 6 2 1 7 1 4 3

WY 3 1 8 6 6 6 5 2 1 3 4 8 5 10 4 2 2 4 3 5 6 2 6 4 2 4 8 3

Complete US Hop Count

Page 12: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 1212

CA

CO

C T

DC

DE

FL

GA

IA

I D

I L

LA

MA

MD

ME

MI

MN

MO

MS

MX

NC

NJ

N V

NY

OH

OR

VA

V T

WI

AL 6 4 6 4 4 1 1 3 5 3 2 6 3 8 4 5 2 1 4 2 5 6 5 3 7 2 6 4

AR 4 2 6 4 5 3 2 2 4 2 1 6 4 8 4 3 1 1 2 2 6 4 5 3 2 3 6 3

AZ 1 1 9 6 7 6 5 3 2 4 3 9 6 11 5 4 3 4 1 5 8 1 8 5 3 5 9 4

CN 3 3 2 4 3 7 5 2 1 2 5 2 3 1 1 1 3 5 99 4 2 2 1 2 2 4 1 1

IN 7 4 4 3 3 4 3 2 5 1 4 4 3 6 1 3 2 3 5 3 3 6 3 1 6 2 4 2

KS 4 1 6 4 5 4 3 2 3 2 3 6 4 8 4 3 1 3 3 3 5 3 5 4 4 3 6 3

KY 6 3 4 2 3 3 2 2 5 1 3 4 2 6 2 3 1 2 4 2 3 5 3 1 6 1 4 2

MT 3 2 8 8 7 7 6 2 1 3 5 8 7 10 4 2 3 5 4 6 7 2 7 5 2 6 8 3

ND 4 3 8 8 7 7 6 2 2 3 6 8 7 10 3 1 3 5 5 6 6 3 6 4 3 6 8 2

NE 4 1 6 4 5 4 3 1 2 2 3 6 4 8 3 2 1 3 3 3 5 3 5 3 3 3 6 2

NH 12 8 2 5 4 9 7 7 9 6 8 1 4 1 5 7 6 7 8 6 3 10 2 4 11 5 1 6

NM 2 1 8 5 7 6 4 3 2 3 2 8 7 10 5 4 2 3 1 4 7 2 7 6 3 6 8 4

OK 3 3 6 5 6 4 3 2 3 2 2 6 5 8 4 3 1 2 2 3 7 3 5 3 4 4 6 3

PA 8 5 2 2 1 5 4 4 7 3 5 2 1 4 2 4 3 4 7 3 1 8 1 1 8 2 2 3

RI 11 8 1 5 4 9 8 7 9 6 8 1 4 3 5 7 6 8 10 6 3 10 2 4 10 5 2 7

SC 8 5 6 3 4 2 1 4 6 4 4 6 3 8 5 6 3 3 6 1 5 8 5 4 8 2 6 5

SD 4 2 7 6 6 6 5 1 2 2 5 7 6 9 3 1 2 4 4 5 6 3 6 4 3 5 7 3

TN 5 3 5 2 4 2 1 2 4 2 2 5 2 7 3 3 1 1 3 1 4 5 4 2 5 1 5 3

TX 3 2 7 7 6 4 4 3 4 3 1 7 4 9 5 4 2 2 1 3 6 3 7 5 4 3 7 4

UT 2 1 8 6 7 6 5 3 1 4 3 8 6 10 5 4 3 4 2 5 7 1 7 5 2 5 8 4

WA 2 3 10 8 8 7 7 4 1 5 5 10 8 12 6 4 4 6 3 7 8 2 9 6 1 7 10 5

WV 7 4 3 2 2 4 3 3 5 2 4 3 1 5 2 4 2 3 6 2 2 6 2 1 7 1 4 3

WY 3 1 8 6 6 6 5 2 1 3 4 8 5 10 4 2 2 4 3 5 6 2 6 4 2 4 8 3

Complete US Hop Count

Page 13: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 1313

 CA

CO

C T

DC

DE

F L

GA

IA

ID

IL

LA

MA

MD

ME

MI

MN

MO

MS

MX

NC

NJ

NV

NY

OH

OR

VA

VT

WI  

AL           24 6                     3                     33

AR                                   4                     4

AZ 16                                                       16

CN     13                 1   3                 5       0 12 34

IN                   5         1                 8         14

KS   1                             1                       2

KY       2                               0           7     9

MT 3               9                         0     2       14

ND                               17                       2 19

NE   1           1                                       0 3

NH                       5                                 5

NM 9                                   1                   11

OK                                 1 2                     3

PA       8 4             1                 4               16

RI     0                                                   0

SC                                       4                 4

SD               3                                         3

TN                                       0                 0

TX                     1               0                   1

UT 2                                                       2

WA 17                                                       17

WV                         14                     22   20     56

WY 23 3                                                     26

  70 5 13 10 4 24 6 5 9 5 1 8 14 3 1 17 2 10 1 5 4 0 5 30 2 27 0 14  

Completed Optimization, Showing Electricity Transactions in TWh

Page 14: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 1414

Generating the Generation Generating the Generation MixMix

Have the % of imports for each importing stateHave the % of imports for each importing state– Example: CA imports 30%Example: CA imports 30%

Have the % of that imported amount that came Have the % of that imported amount that came from each exporterfrom each exporter– AZ: 34%, MT: 3%, NM: 19%, UT: 4%, WA: 36%AZ: 34%, MT: 3%, NM: 19%, UT: 4%, WA: 36%

Know the % mix of the amount from each importerKnow the % mix of the amount from each importer– Arizona: 45% Coal, 10% Gas, 35% Nuclear, 10% HydroArizona: 45% Coal, 10% Gas, 35% Nuclear, 10% Hydro

Multiply these 3 sets of percentages, normalize Multiply these 3 sets of percentages, normalize with existing generation mix to get the new valueswith existing generation mix to get the new values

Page 15: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 1515

The Next Generation (Mix) The Next Generation (Mix) in CAin CA

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Coal Oil Gas Nuclear Hydro Other

w/ o Imports w/ Imports

Page 16: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 1616

Electricity Allocation to Electricity Allocation to SectorsSectors

Now, apply each state’s generation mix to Now, apply each state’s generation mix to the percentage of all the industrial sectors the percentage of all the industrial sectors in the statein the state– 20% of all widgets are manufactured in CA, so 20% of all widgets are manufactured in CA, so

1/5 of the widget sector will have CA’s 1/5 of the widget sector will have CA’s generation mixgeneration mix

Then sum the generation types across all Then sum the generation types across all sectors and statessectors and states– Each sector now includes part of the generation Each sector now includes part of the generation

mix for each state it’s located inmix for each state it’s located in

Page 17: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 1717

Results of ModificationResults of Modification

DescriptionCoal,

%Gas,

%Oil,

%Hydro,

%Nuclear,

%

Household laundry equipment manufacturing 83 2 0 2 13

Oil and gas field machinery and equipment 41 44 1 2 10

Jewelry and silverware manufacturing 23 34 14 9 16

Aircraft manufacturing 30 16 3 31 16

Cellulosic organic fiber manufacturing 49 3 2 2 41

Industries with the highest specific electricity generation mix values (by energy source) in the U.S. economy

Page 18: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 1818

Aircraft ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Coal Oil Gas Nuclear Hydro Other

US Average Aircraft Manufacturing

Page 19: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 1919

Dirty Laundry? And How!Dirty Laundry? And How!

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Coal Oil Gas Nuclear Hydro Other

US Average Household Laundry Equipment

Page 20: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 2020

United States: Well OiledUnited States: Well Oiled

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Coal Oil Gas Nuclear Hydro Other

US Average Oil Change & Lube Shops

Page 21: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 2121

Results Trend Towards Results Trend Towards AverageAverage

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1% 6% 11% 16% 21% 26% 31%

% Difference from US Average

% o

f U

S I

ndust

rial Sect

ors

Page 22: Electricity Generation Mix by US Industrial Sectors Disaggregating Electricity Generation and Modeling Interstate Transfers Joe Marriott, Carnegie Mellon.

September 25, 2003September 25, 2003 Joe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon UniversityJoe Marriott - Carnegie Mellon University 2222

ContributionsContributions Disaggregating adds accuracy to a critical sector in terms of Disaggregating adds accuracy to a critical sector in terms of

environmental impactenvironmental impact

Industrial sector generation mixes answer some interesting Industrial sector generation mixes answer some interesting questionsquestions– Which sectors are vulnerable to shifts in fuel price or Which sectors are vulnerable to shifts in fuel price or

technology change?technology change?– What is the potential impact of carbon taxes on the US What is the potential impact of carbon taxes on the US

economy?economy?

Import-export estimate an intuitive substitute for complete Import-export estimate an intuitive substitute for complete transmission grid analysistransmission grid analysis

Most industrial sectors have a mix close to the US Most industrial sectors have a mix close to the US average mixaverage mix– Some interesting sectors have significant differencesSome interesting sectors have significant differences