Elections and Campaigns

30
Chapter 10 Chapter 10 Elections and Elections and Campaigns Campaigns

Transcript of Elections and Campaigns

Page 1: Elections and Campaigns

Chapter 10Chapter 10Elections and Elections and

CampaignsCampaigns

Page 2: Elections and Campaigns

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

WHO GOVERNS?WHO GOVERNS?1.1. How do American elections determine How do American elections determine

the kind of people who govern us?the kind of people who govern us?

2.2. What matters most in deciding who What matters most in deciding who wins presidential and congressional wins presidential and congressional elections?elections?

TO WHAT ENDS?TO WHAT ENDS?1.1. Do elections make a real difference in Do elections make a real difference in

what laws get passed?what laws get passed?

Page 3: Elections and Campaigns

Campaigns, Then and NowCampaigns, Then and Now

Campaign tasks Campaign tasks performed byperformed by• Media consultantsMedia consultants• Direct mail firmsDirect mail firms• Polling firmsPolling firms• Political technology firmsPolitical technology firms

Better or Worse?Better or Worse? Here and AbroadHere and Abroad

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Hillary Clinton running for president in 2008, p. 224

Charlie Neibergall/AP Photo

Page 4: Elections and Campaigns

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Source: Federal Election Commission, 2008 election summary reports, May 2009.Source: Federal Election Commission, 2008 election summary reports, May 2009.

Page 5: Elections and Campaigns

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Source: Adapted from Federal Election Commission, summary reports, January 2009 and May 2009. Dollar figures Source: Adapted from Federal Election Commission, summary reports, January 2009 and May 2009. Dollar figures rounded. Inflation adjustment keyed to consumer price index 1976–2008, 3.74 (i.e., assumes that what cost $1.00 in rounded. Inflation adjustment keyed to consumer price index 1976–2008, 3.74 (i.e., assumes that what cost $1.00 in 1976 cost $3.74 in 2008).1976 cost $3.74 in 2008).

Page 6: Elections and Campaigns

Figure 10.1 Presidential Campaigns, Figure 10.1 Presidential Campaigns, Spending on Media, 2009Spending on Media, 2009

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Source: Federal Election Commission, summary reports, May 2009. Figures rounded.Source: Federal Election Commission, summary reports, May 2009. Figures rounded.

Page 7: Elections and Campaigns

Presidential versus Presidential versus Congressional CampaignsCongressional Campaigns

Running for PresidentRunning for President• MoneyMoney• OrganizationOrganization• Strategy and themesStrategy and themes

Getting elected to Getting elected to CongressCongress• Winning the primaryWinning the primary• Staying in officeStaying in office

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Political campaigns are hard work, even when you get to fly on the vice president’s airplane. p. 229

Tomas Muscionico/Contact Press Images

Page 8: Elections and Campaigns

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.

Page 9: Elections and Campaigns

Primary versus General Primary versus General CampaignsCampaigns

Two kinds of campaign issuesTwo kinds of campaign issues• PositionPosition• ValenceValence

Television, Debates and Direct MailTelevision, Debates and Direct Mail

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Page 10: Elections and Campaigns

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

p. 234

Page 11: Elections and Campaigns

Politically Speaking: Politically Speaking: Clothespin VoteClothespin Vote

The vote cast by a person who The vote cast by a person who does not like either candidate does not like either candidate and so votes for the less and so votes for the less objectionable of the two, putting objectionable of the two, putting a clothespin over his or her nose a clothespin over his or her nose to keep out the unpleasant to keep out the unpleasant stench. p. 235stench. p. 235

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Page 12: Elections and Campaigns

In the 1888 presidential campaign, In the 1888 presidential campaign, supporters of Benjamin Harrison supporters of Benjamin Harrison rolled a huge ball covered with rolled a huge ball covered with campaign slogans across the campaign slogans across the country. The gimmick, first used in country. The gimmick, first used in 1840, gave rise to the phrase “keep 1840, gave rise to the phrase “keep the ball rolling.” p. 239the ball rolling.” p. 239

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Alaska Governor Sarah Alaska Governor Sarah Palin debates Senator Palin debates Senator Joe Biden during the Joe Biden during the 2008 campaign. p. 2392008 campaign. p. 239

Library of Congress

Rick Wiking, Pool, File/AP Photo

Page 13: Elections and Campaigns

MoneyMoney

The Sources of Campaign MoneyThe Sources of Campaign Money Campaign Finance RulesCampaign Finance Rules A Second Campaign Finance LawA Second Campaign Finance Law New Sources of MoneyNew Sources of Money Money and WinningMoney and Winning

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Page 14: Elections and Campaigns

Candidates first made Candidates first made phonographic recordings of phonographic recordings of their speeches in 1908. their speeches in 1908. Warren G. Harding is Warren G. Harding is shown here recording a shown here recording a speech during the 1920 speech during the 1920 campaign, p. 240campaign, p. 240

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

John F. Kennedy and Richard John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon debate during the Nixon debate during the 1960 presidential campaign, 1960 presidential campaign, p. 240p. 240

Bettmann/CORBIS

Paul Schutzer/ Time Life Pictures/ Getty Images

Page 15: Elections and Campaigns

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

p. 241

Page 16: Elections and Campaigns

Figure 10.2 Growth of PACs Figure 10.2 Growth of PACs 1979–20091979–2009

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Source: Federal Election Commission, March 9, 2009

Page 17: Elections and Campaigns

Source: Source: The New York Times, The New York Times, November 14, 2008November 14, 2008..

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Page 18: Elections and Campaigns

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Source: Federal Election Commission, March 2, 2009.

Page 19: Elections and Campaigns

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Page 20: Elections and Campaigns

What Decides the Election?What Decides the Election?

PartyParty Issues, Especially the EconomyIssues, Especially the Economy

• Prospective votingProspective voting• Retrospective voting Retrospective voting

The CampaignThe Campaign Finding a Winning CoalitionFinding a Winning Coalition

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Page 21: Elections and Campaigns

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

a The figures for 1980, 1984, 1988, and 1996 fail to add up to 100 percent because of missing data.

Page 22: Elections and Campaigns

Figure 10.4 The Economy and Vote Figure 10.4 The Economy and Vote for President, 1948–2004for President, 1948–2004

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Source: From American Public Opinion, 5th ed., by Robert S. Eriksonand Kent L. Tedin. Copyright © 1995 by Addison-Wesley EducationalPublishers, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education, Inc.

Page 23: Elections and Campaigns

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Sources: For 1964–1976: Gallup poll data, as tabulated in Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, “Changing Patterns of Electoral Competition,” in The NewAmerican Political System, ed. Anthony King (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1978), 254–256. For 1980–1992: Data fromNew York Times/CBS News exit polls. For 1996: Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 1997, p. 188, For 2000: Exit polls supplied by ABC News. For 2004 and 2008, CNN exit polls.

Page 24: Elections and Campaigns

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Union members were once Union members were once heavily Democratic, but heavily Democratic, but since Ronald Reagan since Ronald Reagan began winning white began winning white union votes in 1980, these union votes in 1980, these votes have been up for votes have been up for grabs. p. 252grabs. p. 252

At a public meeting, Samuel Joseph At a public meeting, Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher challenged Barack Obama Wurzelbacher challenged Barack Obama on his tax plan and quickly became known on his tax plan and quickly became known as “Joe the Plumber.” p. 252as “Joe the Plumber.” p. 252

Bettmann/Corbis

Al Goldis/ AP Photo

Page 25: Elections and Campaigns

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Sources: For 1964–1976: Gallup poll data, as tabulated in Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, “Changing Patterns of Electoral Competition,” in The New American Political System, ed. Anthony King (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1978), 254–256. For 1980–1992: Data from New York Times/CBS News exit polls. For 1996: Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 1997, p. 188, For 2000: Exit polls supplied by ABC News. For 2004 and 2008, CNN exit polls.

Page 26: Elections and Campaigns

Figure 10.5 Partisan Division of the Figure 10.5 Partisan Division of the Presidential Vote, 1856-2008Presidential Vote, 1856-2008

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

Sources: Information for 1856–1988, updated from Historical Data Archive, Inter-University Consortium for Political Research, as reported in William H. Flanigan and Nancy H. Zingale, Political Behavior of the American Electorate, 3rd ed., 32. For 1992: World Almanac and Book of Facts 1994, 73.

Page 27: Elections and Campaigns

M E M O R A N D U MM E M O R A N D U M

To: To: Arjun Bruno, National Party ChairmanArjun Bruno, National Party Chairman

From: From: Arlene Marcus, State Party ChairwomanArlene Marcus, State Party Chairwoman

Subject: Subject: Supporting a National PrimarySupporting a National Primary

In the past few election cycles, our state’s role in the party In the past few election cycles, our state’s role in the party nomination for president virtually has disappeared with a nomination for president virtually has disappeared with a May primary date. Several states have leapfrogged ahead May primary date. Several states have leapfrogged ahead of us, and party leaders have indicated that they do not of us, and party leaders have indicated that they do not want any more states to move up their primary date. The want any more states to move up their primary date. The national party needs to find a way to ensure that all states, national party needs to find a way to ensure that all states, large and small, have a real voice in nominating a large and small, have a real voice in nominating a presidential candidate.presidential candidate.

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?

Page 28: Elections and Campaigns

Arguments for:Arguments for:

1. A single national primary permits equal participation by all states 1. A single national primary permits equal participation by all states and presents a fair compromise with the increased number of and presents a fair compromise with the increased number of delegates that larger states send to the national conventions, delegates that larger states send to the national conventions, much like the compromises during the original constitutional much like the compromises during the original constitutional debates.debates.

2. The nominating process needs to be less costly, particularly when 2. The nominating process needs to be less costly, particularly when presidential candidates realistically need to raise $100 million a presidential candidates realistically need to raise $100 million a year before the general election to be competitive for the year before the general election to be competitive for the nomination. Holding all primaries and caucuses on a single day nomination. Holding all primaries and caucuses on a single day will reduce overall election expenses significantly.will reduce overall election expenses significantly.

3. If the American electorate knows presidential nominations will be 3. If the American electorate knows presidential nominations will be decided by each party on one day, then they will be more likely to decided by each party on one day, then they will be more likely to vote, a significant factor for elections in which historically, fewer vote, a significant factor for elections in which historically, fewer than 20 percent of eligible voters typically participate.than 20 percent of eligible voters typically participate.

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?

Page 29: Elections and Campaigns

Arguments against:Arguments against:

1. Each state decides in conjunction with the national party when its 1. Each state decides in conjunction with the national party when its primary or caucus will take place, and the federal system of primary or caucus will take place, and the federal system of government designed by the Framers did not guarantee that all government designed by the Framers did not guarantee that all states would be treated equally at all times.states would be treated equally at all times.

2. A national primary would favor candidates with high name 2. A national primary would favor candidates with high name recognition and funding to further that recognition and would recognition and funding to further that recognition and would severely disadvantage lesser known candidates within the party.severely disadvantage lesser known candidates within the party.

3. Even though the general election takes place on one day, voter 3. Even though the general election takes place on one day, voter turnout in the United States still is lower than in other advanced turnout in the United States still is lower than in other advanced industrialized democracies, which suggests that other factors industrialized democracies, which suggests that other factors influence who participates.influence who participates.

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?

Page 30: Elections and Campaigns

Your decision:Your decision:

Support National Primary?Support National Primary?

Oppose National Primary?Oppose National Primary?

Copyright © 2011 CengageCopyright © 2011 Cengage

WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?