EffShip Project conclusions and visions for the · PDF fileEffShip Project conclusions and...
Transcript of EffShip Project conclusions and visions for the · PDF fileEffShip Project conclusions and...
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Project conclusions and visions for the future
Bengt Ramne
ScandiNAOS AB
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Zero emission
Is not a technical problem
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Reduce emission by reduce fuel consumption Nothing beats reduced speed!!
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Pro
pu
lsio
n p
ow
er
[kW
]
ship speed [knots]
Panamax Design draft 12,5 m
Panamax Ballast draft
Roro - Cassette draft 8.2 m
Roro - Trailer draft 6.9 m
Panamax Speed reduction 15.5 - 12 knots reduces consumption from 50 to 22 tons per day
Roro Speed reduction 19 - 16 knots reduces consumption from 47 to 27 tons per day
Roro Speed reduction 22 - 19 knots reduces consumption from 83 to 47 tons per day
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
How slow can we go?
Fuel cost €500/ton
Fuel cost €1000/ton
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
€ - € 10 000 € 20 000 € 30 000 € 40 000 € 50 000 € 60 000 € 70 000
Ship
sp
ee
d [
kn]
TC cost [€/day]
Most economical speed as a function of TC cost at different fuel price levels
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
What else than speed reduction can we do to reduce consumption?
• Traditional hull and propulsion optimization
• Traditional engine optimization
• Energy recovery/ energy transformation
• Utilization of the free energy
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
How much energy can be recovered?
Shaft power output 49.3%
Lu
be
oil
co
ole
r 4
.3%
Jack
et w
ate
r co
ole
r 6
.3%
Exh
au
st
gas
25.4
%
Air
co
ole
r 14
.1%
Heat
rad
iati
on
0.6
%
Fuel energy content
100%
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Value of a ”free” kW electricity Short sea roro 6 600 sailing hours per year HFO operation € 2 000/kW (€ 0.11/kWh)
MGO operation € 3 000/kW ( €0.18/kWh)
Panamax 6 200 sailing hours per year HFO operation € 1 800/kW (€ 0.11/kWh)
MGO operation € 2 800/kW (€ 0.18/kWh)
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
The value of "free" power from recovered heat
€ 0
€ 500 000
€ 1 000 000
€ 1 500 000
€ 2 000 000
€ 2 500 000
€ 3 000 000
€ 3 500 000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Val
ue
/co
st [€
]
Recovered "free" power [kW]
Value of free energy 2000 €/kW
Value of free energy 3000 €/kW
Cost to recover energy from exhaust (steam turbine)
Cost to recover energy from cooling water (ORC)
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
The value of "free" power from recovered heat
€ 0
€ 500 000
€ 1 000 000
€ 1 500 000
€ 2 000 000
€ 2 500 000
€ 3 000 000
€ 3 500 000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Val
ue
/co
st [€
]
Recovered "free" power [kW]
Value of free energy 2000 €/kW
Value of free energy 3000 €/kW
Cost to recover energy from exhaust (steam turbine)
Cost to recover energy from cooling water (ORC)
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
The cost to get "free" power from recovered heat
• The first kW is the cheapest and most cost efficient to recover
• The question is not if energy should be recovered, the question is how much
€ 0
€ 500 000
€ 1 000 000
€ 1 500 000
€ 2 000 000
€ 2 500 000
€ 3 000 000
€ 3 500 000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Val
ue
/co
st [€
]
Recovered "free" power [kW]
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
The cost to get "free" power from recovered heat
• The first kW is the cheapest and most cost efficient to recover
• The question is not if energy should be recovered, the question is how much
€ 0
€ 500 000
€ 1 000 000
€ 1 500 000
€ 2 000 000
€ 2 500 000
€ 3 000 000
€ 3 500 000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Val
ue
/co
st [€
]
Recovered "free" power [kW]
Value of free energy 2000 €/kW
Value of free energy 3000 €/kW
Cost to recover energy from exhaust (steam turbine)
Cost to recover energy from cooling water (ORC)
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
The cost to get "free" power from recovered heat
• The first kW is the cheapest and most cost efficient to recover
• The question is not if energy should be recovered, the question is how much
€ 0
€ 500 000
€ 1 000 000
€ 1 500 000
€ 2 000 000
€ 2 500 000
€ 3 000 000
€ 3 500 000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Val
ue
/co
st [€
]
Recovered "free" power [kW]
Value of free energy 2000 €/kW
Value of free energy 3000 €/kW
Cost to recover energy from exhaust (steam turbine)
Cost to recover energy from cooling water (ORC)
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
The cost to get "free" power from recovered heat
• The first kW is the cheapest and most cost efficient to recover
• The question is not if energy should be recovered, the question is how much
€ 0
€ 500 000
€ 1 000 000
€ 1 500 000
€ 2 000 000
€ 2 500 000
€ 3 000 000
€ 3 500 000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Val
ue
/co
st [€
]
Recovered "free" power [kW]
Value of free energy 2000 €/kW
Value of free energy 3000 €/kW
Cost to recover energy from exhaust (steam turbine)
Cost to recover energy from cooling water (ORC)
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
The cost to get "free" power from recovered heat
• The first kW is the cheapest and most cost efficient to recover
• The question is not if energy should be recovered, the question is how much
€ 0
€ 500 000
€ 1 000 000
€ 1 500 000
€ 2 000 000
€ 2 500 000
€ 3 000 000
€ 3 500 000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Val
ue
/co
st [€
]
Recovered "free" power [kW]
Value of free energy 2000 €/kW
Value of free energy 3000 €/kW
Cost to recover energy from exhaust (steam turbine)
Cost to recover energy from cooling water (ORC)
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
LO cool
LO cool
Ai rcooling HT out
Jacket cooling out
EGB
Jacket cooling in
Turbine Generator
Condenser
Air cooling HT in
Air cooling LT out
Air cooling LT in
Turbine Generator
Condenser
Evaporator
Lube oil
Central cooler
ORC 2
500-1000 kW
250-500 kW
LO COOLER
Air intake
Compressed air
Compressed and cooled air
Energy recovery and transformation
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Equipment Weight Size Recovered /transformed
energy
Investment incl. Break even at 75%
NMCR
Four stroke Main Engines 2 x 10 MW
Exhaust gas boiler, EGB 30 ton 5m h=6m 4 000 kW € 750 000
Steam turbine 10 ton 3 x 3 x 2 m 600 kW € 450 000 10 000 h
Modified cooling system 3000 kW € 100 000
ORC turbine 20 ton 3 x 3 x 2 m 350 kW € 600 000 10 000 h
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
What else than speed reduction can we do to reduce consumption?
• Traditional hull and propulsion optimization
• Traditional engine optimization
• Energy recovery/ energy transformation
• Utilization of the free energy
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
EffShip Panamax with rotors and sails
Rotor projected area 530 m2
Sail projected area 3550 m2
Kite area 640 m2
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Re
lati
ve r
ed
cuti
on
in p
rop
uls
ion
po
we
r
true wind direction (degr)
Reduction of propulsion power for a Panamax tanker for different sail alternatives
Ship speed 12 knots, wind speed 9 m/s
As built
Rotors (4 rotors d=4.7 m h= 28 m)
Rotors if not folded
EffSail telescopic and foldable (total sail area 3500m2)
Kite 640 m2
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Shipping route Rotterdam Caracass
saving
all year/winter %
ship speed (kn) sail rotor kite
12 21/24 15/17 9/10
14 17/20 13/15 6/7
16 12/14 9/10
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Motor sailing Panamax tanker
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Po
we
r [k
W]
Speed [knots]
with 3500 m2 sail, wind speed 8 m/s
Diff (Sail contribution) [kW]
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Motor sailing Panamax tanker
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
14 000
16 000
18 000
20 000
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Po
we
r [k
W]
Speed [knots]
with 3500 m2 sail, wind speed 8 m/s
Engine power without sail [kW]
Engine power with sail [kW]
Diff (Sail contribution) [kW]
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Equipment Weight (additional) Size Power reduction
Vs = 14 knots Vw = 8 m/s
Investment Propulsion energy
cost (MGO)
Break even
after
EffSail 150 tons 3500 m2 1400 kW € 1 500 000 180 €/MWh 6000 h
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Emissions reduced by
• Reduced fuel consumption by
– Speed reduction
– Energy recovery/ energy transformation
– Utilization of the free energy
…but still not zero emission
Further reduction by
– Exhaust gas cleaning
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Exhaust Gas Cleaning
NOx -EGR
NOx - SCR
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Exhaust Gas Cleaning
• SOx
– Scrubbers
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
• Scrubber • Piping system • Sea water pump • Separator • Sludge tank
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
• Scrubber • Piping system • Sea water pump • Separator • Sludge tank
• Reagent tank
• Dosing unit • Bleed of holding tank • Effluent holding tank • Srubbing water pump • Srubbing water cooler • Fresh water tank
Equipment Weight Size Power
consumption
Consumable
(50% NaOH)
Operational
cost
Fuel cost saving
Diff MGO, HFO
Investment
New building**
Break even after at 75%
NMCR
Hybrid
scrubber
14 ton dry
27 ton w water
Scrubber tower:
4.2m h=10m
200 kW
(Appr 1%)
13 l/MWh*
20 kg/MWh*
10 €/MWh* 50 €/MWh* € 4 000 000 100 000 MWh** 6 700 h
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Emissions reduced by
• Reduced fuel consumption by
– Speed reduction
– Energy recovery/ energy transformation
– Utilization of the free energy
Further reduction by
– Exhaust gas cleaning
…but still not zero emission
– Alternative fuel
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Present and Future Maritime Fuels
• HFO
• LSHFO
• ULSHFO
• MDO
• MGO
• LNG
• Biofuel
• DME
• Methanol
• Synthetic
diesel
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Equipment Weight (additional) Size Fuel cost saving
Diff MGO, MeOH
Investment Break even
after
Hours at
75% NMCR
Methanol tanks For new building: - 1800 m3
(Same range as 880 m3 HFO) 48 €/MWh*
€ 2 000 000 42 000 MWh 2 700 h
For conversion: 50 tons € 5 000 000 100 000 MW h 6 700 h
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip Equipment Weight Size Recovered /transformed
energy
Investment incl. Break even at 75%
NMCR
Four stroke Main Engines 2 x 10 MW
Exhaust gas boiler, EGB 30 ton 5m h=6m 4 000 kW € 750 000
Steam turbine 10 ton 3 x 3 x 2 m 600 kW € 450 000 10 000 h
Modified cooling system 3000 kW € 100 000
ORC turbine 20 ton 3 x 3 x 2 m 350 kW € 600 000 10 000 h
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip Equipment Weight (additional) Size Fuel cost saving
Diff MGO, MeOH
Investment Break even
after
Hours at 75%
NMCR
Methanol tanks For new building:
250 tons 1600 m3
(Same range as 880 m3 HFO) 40 €/MWh
€ 12 000 000 300 000 MWh 20 000 h
For conversion: € 18 000 000 450 000 MWh 30 000 h
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Emission reduction by alternative fuel
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Emissions reduced by
• Reduced fuel consumption by
– Speed reduction
– Energy recovery/ energy transformation
– Utilization of the free energy
Further reduction by
– Exhaust gas cleaning
– Alternative fuel
…but still not zero emission
– More alternative fuel
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Crude oil Natural gas
Bio Gas Anaerobic digestion Coal Biomass
Municipal waste Solar Hydro Wind Nuclear
Refining Cooling Reformation Gasification Electrolysis of water
-163C CH4 + H2O →
CO + 3 H2 C + ½O2 → CO H2O → H2 + ½O2 C + H2O → CO + H2
CO + H2O →
CO2 + H2 CO + H2O → CO2 + H2 Carbon capture CO2 + C → 2CO CO2
Residuals Distillates LNG Syngas HFO MGO Hydrogen + Carbon monoxide (H2 + CO)
Methanol DME Gas to liquid - GTL Direct synthesis, using a dual catalyst system Fischer Tropsch
CO + 2H2 → CH3OH Fixed bed reactor process (Haldor Topsö) Cracking
CO2 + 3H2 → CH3OH +H2O Slurry bed reactor process (JFE, Air Products and Chemicals) Paraffin
CO2 + H2 → CO +H2O Naptha Diesel
DME Dehydration of methanol 2CH3OH → CH3OCH3 + H2O
DME to liquid
Mobile process
HFO ICE Fuel
MGO ICE Fuel
LNG ICE/FC Fuel
Methanol ICE/FC Fuel
Synthetic petrol
DME ICE Fuel Paraffin Na-
ptha Diesel
Hydrogen as ICE/FC Fuel
Diesel fuel Diesel fuel Otto fuel Otto fuel Otto fuel Diesel fuel
Requires spark ignition or dual fuel
Requires spark ignition ,dual fuel or methanol –diesel engine ScandiNAOS/BR 2011-03-23
Alternative Marine Fuel - Feedstock and products
ScandiNAOS AB Presentation – Gotlandsbolaget 2013-03-08 [email protected]
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Zero emission!
….. the path is mapped
How far can we go?
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Where to start?
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Equipment Weight Size Power
consumption
Consumable
(50% NaOH)
Operational
cost
Fuel cost saving
Diff MGO, HFO
Investment
Retrofit
Break even after at 75%
NMCR
Hybrid
scrubber
14 ton dry
27 ton w water
Scrubber tower:
4.2m h=10m
200 kW
(Appr 1%)
13 l/MWh
20 kg/MWh
10 €/MWh 50 €/MWh € 5 000 000 125 000 MWh 8 500 h
- Scrubber tower - Piping system
- Sea water pump - Treatment unit separator
- Sludge tank - Reagent tank
- Dosing unit - Bleed of holding tank
- Effluent holding tank - Scrubbing water pump
- Scrubbing water cooler - Fresh water tank
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Equipment Weight (additional) Size Fuel cost saving
Diff MGO, MeOH
Investment Break even after Hours at 75%
NMCR
Methanol tanks 50 tons 1800 m3
(Same range as 880 m3 HFO) 48 €/MWh* € 5 000 000 100 000 MWh 6 700 h
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip Fuel comparison (Based on conversion with 5 years pay-back and 6% interest)
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
0,18
0,2
HFO ScrubberClose loop
MGO Methanol LNG
€/k
Wh
- m
ech
anic
al p
ow
er
Fuel alternatives
LNG conversion
LNG
Methanol conversion
Methanol
MGO
Maintenance
Sludge
FW
Electricity
NAOH 50%
Scrubber equipment cost per kWh
HFO
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Some suggested projects for industrialization of the Effship findings
• Methanol fuelled marine engines
• Retrofit technologies for heat recovery from sulphur free fuels
• Methanol fuel – sustainably produced
• Trade and logistic
• Complementary propulsion
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
• Sjöfartstidningens nyhetsbrev #13 – Finnish fund for investments in exhaust
gas cleaning and alternative fuel
– € 30 000 000 for 2013
– Max 50% government finance
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
ScandiNAOS
Lloyds Register
Chalmers
Methanex
Haldor Topsoe
SSPA
Port of Gothenburg
TTS Ships Equipment
DEC
Gotenius S-MAN
Sjöfartsverket
Breakwater Publishing
Gothenburg Chartering
Melship
BRAX shipping
Ide Marine
Canopus SOL
Basstech
Gothia Marine
MAN
GVAC
Transatlantic
Göteborg Energi
White Smoke
Marinvest
Laurin Maritime
Wärtsilä
Cityvarvet
FKAB
ACL Svensk Sjöfarts tidning Cobelfret
DFDS
Stora Enso
Stena
DNV
Sjöfartens analysinstitut
Cargotech
Furetank
Swedia
Donsötank
Älvtank
Sirius
Ektank
Veritas tankers
Bunker service
Donsö
Volvo Penta
Hållbar sjöfart som är energi- och kostnadseffektiv med minimal miljöpåverkan
GESAB
SPIRETH
EffShip
PREEM
Bergs Propulsion
Ö-varvet
Fin
al S
emin
ar, G
oth
enb
urg
, Mar
ch 2
1, 2
01
3
EffShip
Thank you