EFFLUENT LIMITATION GUIDELINES (ELGs ... - · PDF fileATTACHMENT F EFFLUENT LIMITATION...

3
ATTACHMENT F EFFLUENT LIMITATION GUIDELINES (ELGs) Order 2014-0057-DWQ as amended by Order 2015-0122-DWQ & Order 20XX-XXXX-DWQ 1 ATTACHMENT F EFFLUENT LIMITATION GUIDELINES (ELGs) NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES (GENERAL PERMIT) The following Parts of federal regulations at 40 Code of Federal Regulations Chapter I Subchapter N (Subchapter N) contain ELGs approved by US EPA for specific categories of industrial storm water discharges: Point Source Category ELGs 1 Part 411 - Cement Manufacturing 411.pdf Part 418 - Fertilizer Manufacturing 418.pdf Part 419 - Petroleum Refining 419.pdf Part 422 - Phosphate Manufacturing 422.pdf Part 423 - Steam Electric Power Generating 423.pdf 1 The applicable ELGs are attached to this Attachment F. To view the attachments from an electronic (pdf) version of this Attachment F, left-click on the paper clip icon to the left of this pdf file to make the attachment window appear, then double-click on the icons of the attached pdf files. The attachments are also available on the Industrial Storm Water program pages of the State Water Resources Control Board's website (www.waterboards.ca.gov).

Transcript of EFFLUENT LIMITATION GUIDELINES (ELGs ... - · PDF fileATTACHMENT F EFFLUENT LIMITATION...

ATTACHMENT F

EFFLUENT LIMITATION GUIDELINES (ELGs)

Order 2014-0057-DWQ as amended by Order 2015-0122-DWQ & Order 20XX-XXXX-DWQ 1

ATTACHMENT F

EFFLUENT LIMITATION GUIDELINES (ELGs)

NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES

ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES (GENERAL PERMIT)

The following Parts of federal regulations at 40 Code of Federal Regulations Chapter I Subchapter N (Subchapter N) contain ELGs approved by US EPA for specific categories of industrial storm water discharges:

Point Source Category ELGs1

Part 411 - Cement Manufacturing

411.pdf

Part 418 - Fertilizer Manufacturing

418.pdf

Part 419 - Petroleum Refining 419.pdf

Part 422 - Phosphate Manufacturing

422.pdf

Part 423 - Steam Electric Power Generating

423.pdf

1 The applicable ELGs are attached to this Attachment F. To view the attachments from an electronic (pdf) version of this Attachment F, left-click on the paper clip icon to the left of this pdf file to make the attachment window appear, then double-click on the icons of the attached pdf files. The attachments are also available on the Industrial Storm Water program pages of the State Water Resources Control Board's website (www.waterboards.ca.gov).

ATTACHMENT F

EFFLUENT LIMITATION GUIDELINES (ELGs)

Order 2014-0057-DWQ as amended by Order 2015-0122-DWQ & Order 20XX-XXXX-DWQ 2

2 The applicable ELGs are attached to this Attachment F. To view the attachments from an electronic (pdf) version of this Attachment F, left-click on the paper clip icon to the left of this pdf file to make the attachment window appear, then double-click on the icons of the attached pdf files. The attachments are also available on the Industrial Storm Water program pages of the State Water Resources Control Board's website (www.waterboards.ca.gov).

Point Source Category ELGs2

Part 429 - Wetting of logs at wet deck storage areas

429.pdf

Part 434 - Coal Mining

434.pdf

Part 436 - Mineral Mining And Processing

436.pdf

Part 440 - Ore Mining And Dressing

440.pdf

Part 443 - Paving And Roofing Materials (Tars And Asphalt)

443.pdf

Part 445 - Landfills

445.pdf

Part 449 - Airport Deicing

449.pdf

ATTACHMENT F

EFFLUENT LIMITATION GUIDELINES (ELGs)

Order 2014-0057-DWQ as amended by Order 2015-0122-DWQ & Order 20XX-XXXX-DWQ 3

New Source Performance Standards

New source performance standards (NSPS) represent the best available demonstrated control technology standards. US EPA has established NSPS guidelines for the industries found in the Table below. The intent of NSPS guidelines is to set effluent limitations that represent state-of-the-art treatment technology for new sources.3

Table 1 - Storm Water Specific NSPS Effluent Limitation Guidelines

Regulated Discharge 40 CFR Section

Multi Sector

General Permit Sector

NSPS Date New Source Data

Established

Discharge resulting from spray down or intentional wetting of logs as wet deck storage areas

Part 429, Subpart I

A Yes 1/26/81

Runoff from phosphate fertilizer manufacturing facilities that comes into contact with any raw materials, finished products, by-products or waste products (SIC 2874)

Part 418, Subpart A

C Yes 4/8/74

Runoff from asphalt emulsion facilities Part 443, Subpart A

D Yes 7/28/75

Runoff from materials storage piles at cement manufacturing facilities

Part 411, Subpart C

E Yes 2/20/74

Mine dewatering discharges at crushed stone, construction sand and gravel, or industrial sand mining facilities

Part 436, Subparts B, C, D

J No N/A

Runoff from hazardous waste and nonhazardous waste landfills

Part 445, Subparts A

and B

K, L Yes 2/2/00

Runoff from coal storage piles at steam electric generating facilities

Part 423 O Yes 11/19/82 & 10/8/74

Discharges from primary airports with over 1,000 annual jet departures that conduct deicing operations.

Part 449, Subpart A

S Yes NA

3 New source means any building, structure, facility, or installation from which there is or may be a “discharge of pollutants,” the construction of which commenced: (1) After promulgation of standards of performance under section 306 of CWA which are applicable to such source, or (2) After proposal of standards of performance in accordance with section 306 of CWA which are applicable to such source, but only if the standards are promulgated in accordance with section 306 within 120 days of their proposal as defined in 40 C.F.R section 122.26.

347

Environmental Protection Agency § 436.22

SOURCE: 40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart A—Dimension Stone Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart B—Crushed Stone Subcategory

SOURCE: 42 FR 35849, July 12, 1977, unless otherwise noted.

§ 436.20 Applicability; description of the crushed stone subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the mining or quarrying and the processing of crushed and broken stone and riprap. This subpart includes all types of rock and stone. Rock and stone that is crushed or broken prior to the extraction of a mineral are else-where covered. The processing of cal-cite, however, in conjunction with the processing of crushed and broken lime-stone or dolomite is included in this subpart.

§ 436.21 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term ‘‘mine dewatering’’ shall mean any water that is im-pounded or that collects in the mine and is pumped, drained or otherwise re-moved from the mine through the ef-forts of the mine operator. However, if a mine is also used for treatment of process generated waste water, dis-charges of commingled water from the facilities shall be deemed discharges of process generated waste water.

(c) The term ‘‘10-year 24-hour precipi-tation event’’ shall mean the maximum 24-hour precipitation event with a probable reoccurrence interval of once in 10 years. This information is avail-able in ‘‘Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 40,’’ May 1961 and ‘‘NOAA Atlas 2,’’ 1973 for the 11 Western States, and may be obtained from the National Climatic Center of the Environmental Data Service, National Oceanic and At-mospheric Administration, U.S. De-partment of Commerce.

(d) The term ‘‘mine’’ shall mean an area of land, surface or underground, actively mined for the production of crushed and broken stone from natural deposits.

(e) The term ‘‘process generated waste water’’ shall mean any waste water used in the slurry transport of mined material, air emissions control, or processing exclusive of mining. The term shall also include any other water which becomes commingled with such waste water in a pit, pond, lagoon, mine, or other facility used for treat-ment of such waste water.

§ 436.22 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(1) Discharges of process generated waste water pollutants from facilities that recycle waste water for use in processing shall not exceed the fol-lowing limitations:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(2) Mine dewatering discharges shall not exceed the following limitations:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) Any overflow from facilities gov-erned by this subpart shall not be sub-ject to the limitations of paragraph (a)

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00357 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

348

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 436.30

of this section if the facilities are de-signed, constructed and maintained to contain or treat the volume of waste water which would result from a 10- year 24-hour precipitation event.

(c) In the case of a discharge into re-ceiving waters for which the pH, if unaltered by man’s activities, is or would be less than 6.0 and water qual-ity criteria in water quality standards approved under the Act authorize such lower pH, the pH limitations for such discharge may be adjusted downward to the pH water quality criterion for the receiving waters. In no case shall a pH limitation outside the range 5.0 to 9.0 be permitted.

[42 FR 35849, July 12, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 76793, Dec. 28, 1979; 60 FR 33967, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

Subpart C—Construction Sand and Gravel Subcategory

SOURCE: 42 FR 35850, July 12, 1977, unless otherwise noted.

§ 436.30 Applicability; description of the construction sand and gravel subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the mining and the proc-essing of sand and gravel for construc-tion or fill uses, except that on-board processing of dredged sand and gravel which is subject to the provisions of 33 CFR part 230 of this chapter will not be governed by the provisions of this sub-part.

§ 436.31 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term ‘‘mine dewatering’’ shall mean any water that is im-pounded or that collects in the mine and is pumped, drained or otherwise re-moved from the mine through the ef-forts of the mine operator. This term shall also include wet pit overflows caused solely by direct rainfall and ground water seepage. However, if a mine is also used for treatment of proc-ess generated waste water, discharges of commingled water from the mine

shall be deemed discharges of process generated waste water.

(c) The term ‘‘10-year 24-hour precipi-tation event’’ shall mean the maximum 24 hour precipitation event with a probable reoccurrence interval of once in 10 years. This information is avail-able in ‘‘Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 40,’’ May 1961 and ‘‘NOAA Atlas 2,’’ 1973 for the 11 Western States, and may be obtained from the National Climatic Center of the Environmental Data Service, National Oceanic and At-mospheric Administration, U.S. De-partment of Commerce.

(d) The term ‘‘mine’’ shall mean an area of land, surface or underground, actively mined for the production of sand and gravel from natural deposits.

(e) The term ‘‘process generated waste water’’ shall mean any waste water used in the slurry transport of mined material, air emissions control, or processing exclusive of mining. The term shall also include any other water which becomes commingled with such waste water in a pit, pond, lagoon, mine or other facility used for treat-ment of such waste water. The term does not include waste water used for the suction dredging of deposits in a body of water and returned directly to the body of waste without being used for other purposes or combined with other waste water.

§ 436.32 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(1) Discharges of process generated waste water pollutants from facilities that recycle waste water for use in processing shall not exceed the fol-lowing limitations:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00358 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

349

Environmental Protection Agency § 436.41

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(2) Mine dewatering discharges shall not exceed the following limitations:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) Any overflow from facilities gov-erned by this subpart shall not be sub-ject to the limitations of paragraph (a) of this section if the facilities are de-signed, constructed and maintained to contain or treat the volume of waste water which would result from a 10- year 24-hour precipitation event.

(c) In the case of a discharge into re-ceiving waters for which the pH, if unaltered by man’s activities, is or would be less than 6.0 and water qual-ity criteria in water quality standards approved under the Act authorize such lower pH, the pH limitation for such discharge may be adjusted downward to the pH water quality criterion for the receiving waters. In no case shall a pH limitation outside the range 5.0 to 9.0 be permitted.

[42 FR 35850, July 12, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 76793, Dec. 28, 1979; 60 FR 33967, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

Subpart D—Industrial Sand Subcategory

SOURCE: 42 FR 35851, July 12, 1977, unless otherwise noted.

§ 436.40 Applicability; description of the industrial sand subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the mining and the proc-essing of sand and gravel for uses other than construction and fill. These uses include, but are not limited to glass-making, molding, abrasives, filtration, refractories, and refractory bonding.

§ 436.41 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations, and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term ‘‘mine dewatering’’ shall mean any water that is im-pounded or that collects in the mine and is pumped, drained, or otherwise removed from the mine through the ef-forts of the mine operator. This term shall also include wet pit overflows caused solely by direct rainfall and ground water seepage. However, if a mine is also used for the treatment of process generated waste water, dis-charges of commingled water from the mine shall be deemed discharges of process generated waste water.

(c) The term ‘‘10-year 24-hour precipi-tation event’’ shall mean the maximum 24 hour precipitation event with a probable reoccurrence interval of once in 10 years. This information is avail-able in ‘‘Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 40,’’ May 1961 and ‘‘NOAA Atlas 2,’’ 1973 for the 11 Western States, and may be obtained from the National Climatic Center of the Environmental Data Service, National Oceanic and At-mospheric Administration, U.S. De-partment of Commerce.

(d) The term ‘‘mine’’ shall mean an area of land actively mined for the pro-duction of sand and gravel from nat-ural deposits.

(e) The term ‘‘process generated waste water’’ shall mean any waste water used in the slurry transport of mined material, air emissions control, or processing exclusive of mining. The term shall also include any other water which becomes commingled with such waste water in a pit, pond, lagoon, mine or other facility used for treat-ment of such waste water. The terms does not include waste water used for the suction dredging of deposits in a body of water and returned directly to the body of water without being used for other purposes or combined with other waste water.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00359 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

350

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 436.42

§ 436.42 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(1) With the exception of operation using HF flotation, discharges of proc-ess waste water pollutants from facili-ties that recycle waste water, for use in the processing shall not exceed the following limitations:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS ...................................... 45 mg/l 25 mg/l. pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(2) Except as provided in paragraphs (a) (1) and (3) of this section, there shall be no discharge of process gen-erated waste water pollutants into nav-igable waters.

(3) Process generated waste water from facilities employing HF flotation shall not exceed the following limita-tions: [Metric units, kg/kkg of total product; English units, lb/1,000 lb

of total product]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS ...................................... 0.046 0.023 Total fluoride ........................ .006 .003 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(4) Mine dewatering discharges shall not exceed the following limitations:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS ...................................... 45 mg/l 25 mg/l. pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) Any overflow from facilities gov-erned by this subpart shall not be sub-ject to the limitations of paragraph (a) of this section if the facilities are de-signed, constructed and maintained to contain or treat the volume of waste water which would result from a 10- year 24-hour precipitation event.

(c) In the case of a discharge into re-ceiving waters for which the pH, if unaltered by man’s activities, is or would be less than 6.0 and water qual-ity criteria in water quality standards approved under the Act authorize such lower pH, the pH limitation for such discharge may be adjusted downward to the pH water quality criterion for the receiving waters. In no case shall a pH limitation outside the range 5.0 to 9.0 be permitted.

[42 FR 35851, July 12, 1977, as amended at 60 FR 33967, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

Subpart E—Gypsum Subcategory

§ 436.50 Applicability; description of the gypsum subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of gypsum.

§ 436.51 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.52 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00360 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

351

Environmental Protection Agency § 436.72

achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) For operations not employing wet air emissions control scrubbers there shall be no discharge of process gen-erated waste water pollutants into nav-igable waters.

(b) Only that volume of water result-ing from precipitation that exceeds the maximum safe surge capacity of a process waste water impoundment may be discharged from that impoundment. The height difference between the max-imum safe surge capacity level and the normal operating level must be greater than the inches of rain representing the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event as established by the National Climatic Center, National Oceanic and Atmos-pheric Administration for the locality in which such impoundment is located.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33967, June 29, 1995]

Subpart F—Asphaltic Mineral Subcategory

§ 436.60 Applicability; description of the asphaltic mineral subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of bitu-minous limestone, oil-impregnated di-atomite and oilsonite not primarily as an energy source.

§ 436.61 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.62 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) Subject to the provisions of the following paragraphs of this section, there shall be no discharge of process generated waste water pollutants into navigable waters.

(b) Only that volume of water result-ing from precipitation that exceeds the maximum safe surge capacity of a process waste water impoundment may be discharged from that impoundment. The height difference between the max-imum safe surge capacity level and the normal operating level must be greater than the inches of rain representing the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event as established by the National Climatic Center, National Oceanic and Atmos-pheric Administration for the locality in which such impoundment is located.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33967, June 29, 1995]

Subpart G—Asbestos and Wollastonite Subcategory

§ 436.70 Applicability; description of the asbestos and wollastonite sub-category.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of asbestos and wollastonite.

§ 436.71 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.72 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) Subject to the provisions of the following paragraphs of this section, there shall be no discharge of process generated waste water pollutants into navigable waters.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00361 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

352

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 436.100

(b) Only that volume of water result-ing from precipitation that exceeds the maximum safe surge capacity of a process waste water impoundment may be discharged from that impoundment. The height difference between the max-imum safe surge capacity level and the normal operating level must be greater than the inches of rain representing the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event as established by the National Climatic Center, National Oceanic and Atmos-pheric Administration for the locality in which such impoundment is located.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33967, June 29, 1995]

Subpart H—Lightweight Aggre-gates Subcategory [Re-served]

Subpart I—Mica and Sericite Sub-category [Reserved]

Subpart J—Barite Subcategory

§ 436.100 Applicability; description of the barite subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of barite.

§ 436.101 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.102 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT): For operations not employing wet processes or flotation processes there shall be no discharge of process gen-

erated waste water pollutants into nav-igable waters.

[60 FR 33967, June 29, 1995]

Subpart K—Fluorspar Subcategory

§ 436.110 Applicability; description of the fluorspar subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of fluorspar.

§ 436.111 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.112 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT): For operations not employing heavy media separation or flotation processes there shall be no discharge of process generated waste water pollutants into navigable waters.

[60 FR 33967, June 29, 1995]

Subpart L—Salines From Brine Lakes Subcategory

§ 436.120 Applicability; description of the salines from brine lakes sub-category.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of salines from brine lakes.

§ 436.121 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00362 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

353

Environmental Protection Agency § 436.142

§ 436.122 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraph (b) of this section, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT): there shall be no dis-charge of process waste water pollut-ants into navigable waters.

(b) The limitations specified in para-graph (a) of this section shall be ap-plied on a net basis if the discharge is in compliance with § 125.28 of this chap-ter ‘‘the source of the applicant’s water supply is the same body of water into which the discharge is made * * * ’’.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33968, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

Subpart M—Borax Subcategory

§ 436.130 Applicability; description of the borax subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of borate minerals. Borax obtained from brine lakes is regulated in the salines from brine lakes subcategory (subpart L of this part).

§ 436.131 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.132 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraph (b) of this section, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following

effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT): there shall be no dis-charge of process waste water pollut-ants into navigable waters.

(b) Only that volume of water result-ing from precipitation that exceeds the maximum safe surge capacity of a process waste water impoundment may be discharged from that impoundment. The height difference between the max-imum safe surge capacity level and the normal operating level must be greater than the inches of rain representing the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event as established by the National Climatic Center, National Oceanic and Atmos-pheric Administration for the locality in which such impoundment is located.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33968, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

Subpart N—Potash Subcategory

AUTHORITY: Sec. 306, Federal Water Pollu-tion Control Act, as amended.

§ 436.140 Applicability; description of the potash subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of potash. Potash obtained from brine lakes is regulated in the saline from brine lakes subcategory (subpart L of this part).

§ 436.141 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.142 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraph (b) of this section, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00363 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

354

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 436.150

degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT): there shall be no dis-charge of process waste water pollut-ants into navigable waters.

(b) Only that volume of water result-ing from precipitation that exceeds the maximum safe surge capacity of a process waste water impoundment may be discharged from that impoundment. The height difference between the max-imum safe surge capacity level and the normal operating level must be greater than the inches of rain representing the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event as established by the National Climatic Center, National Oceanic and Atmos-pheric Administration for the locality in which such impoundment is located.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33968, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

Subpart O—Sodium Sulfate Subcategory

§ 436.150 Applicability; description of the sodium sulfate subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of sodium sulfate. Sodium sulfate obtained from brine lakes is regulated in the salines from brine lakes subcategory (subpart L of this part).

§ 436.151 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.152 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraph (b) of this section, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently

available (BPT): there shall be no dis-charge of process waste water pollut-ants into navigable waters.

(b) Only that volume of water result-ing from precipitation that exceeds the maximum safe surge capacity of a process waste water impoundment may be discharged from that impoundment. The height difference between the max-imum safe surge capacity level and the normal operating level must be greater than the inches of rain representing the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event as established by the National Climatic Center, National Oceanic and Atmos-pheric Administration for the locality in which such impoundment is located.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33968, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

Subpart P—Trona Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart Q—Rock Salt Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart R—Phosphate Rock Subcategory

AUTHORITY: Sec. 306, Federal Water Pollu-tion Control Act, as amended.

§ 436.180 Applicability; description of the phosphate rock subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the mining and the proc-essing of phosphate bearing rock, ore or earth for the phosphate content.

[43 FR 9809, Mar. 10, 1978]

§ 436.181 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term ‘‘mine dewatering’’ shall mean any water that is im-pounded or that collects in the mine and is pumped, drained or otherwise re-moved from the mine through the ef-forts of the mine operator.

(c) The term ‘‘10-year 24-hour precipi-tation event’’ shall mean the maximum 24 hour precipitation event with a probable reoccurrence interval of once

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00364 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

355

Environmental Protection Agency § 436.190

in 10 years. This information is avail-able in ‘‘Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 40,’’ May 1961 and ‘‘NOAA Atlas 2,’’ 1973 for the 11 Western States, and may be obtained from the National Climatic Center of the Environmental Data Service, National Oceanic and At-mospheric Administration, U.S. De-partment of Commerce.

(d) The term ‘‘mine’’ shall mean an area of land, surface or underground, actively used for or resulting from the extraction of a mineral from natural deposits.

(e) The term ‘‘process generated waste water’’ shall mean any waste water used in the slurry transport of mined material, air emissions control, or processing exclusive of mining. The term shall also include any other water which becomes commingled with such waste water in a pit, pond lagoon, mine, or other facility used for settling or treatment of such waste water.

[43 FR 9809, Mar. 10, 1978]

§ 436.182 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraph (b) of this section, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT):

(1) Discharges of process generated waste water and mine dewatering dis-charges, shall not exceed the following limitations:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS ...................................... 60 mg/l 30 mg./l. pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) Any overflow from facilities gov-erned by this subpart shall not be sub-ject to the limitations of paragraph (a) of this section if the facilities are de-

signed, constructed and maintained to contain or treat the volume of waste water which would result from a 10- year 24-hour precipitation event.

[42 FR 35852, July 12, 1977, as amended at 60 FR 33968, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

§§ 436.183–436.184 [Reserved]

§ 436.185 Standards of performance for new sources.

(a) Subject to the provisions of para-graph (b) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant prop-erties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available demonstrated control tech-nology.

(1) Discharges of process generated waste water and mine dewatering dis-charges, shall not exceed the following limitations:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS ...................................... 60 mg/l 30 mg/l. pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) Any overflow from facilities gov-erned by this subpart shall not be sub-ject to the limitations of paragraph (a) of this section if the facilities are de-signed, constructed and maintained to contain or treat the volume of waste water which would result from a 10- year 24-hour precipitation event.

[43 FR 9810, Mar. 10, 1978]

Subpart S—Frasch Sulfur Subcategory

§ 436.190 Applicability; description of the Frasch sulfur subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of sulfur on shore and in marshes and estuaries by the Frasch process. Not covered are sulfur refining operations that are not performed at the mining and collection site.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00365 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

356

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 436.191

§ 436.191 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.192 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraph (b) of this section for operations mining anhydrite depos-its, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the fol-lowing effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT): there shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants into navigable waters.

(b) Only that volume of water result-ing from precipitation that exceeds the maximum safe surge capacity of a process waste water impoundment may be discharged from that impoundment. The height difference between the max-imum safe surge capacity level and the normal operating level must be greater than the inches of rain representing the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event as established by the National Climatic Center, National Oceanic and Atmos-pheric Administration for the locality in which such impoundment is located.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33968, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

Subpart T—Mineral Pigments Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart U—Lithium Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart V—Bentonite Subcategory

§ 436.220 Applicability; description of the bentonite subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of bentonite.

§ 436.221 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.222 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT): There shall be no discharge of process generated waste water pollutants into navigable waters.

[60 FR 33968, June 29, 1995]

Subpart W—Magnesite Subcategory

§ 436.230 Applicability; description of the magnesite subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of naturally occurring magnesite ore.

§ 436.231 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.232 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraph (b) of this section, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00366 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

357

Environmental Protection Agency § 436.252

available (BPT): There shall be no dis-charge of process generated waste water pollutants into navigable waters.

(b) Only that volume of water result-ing from precipitation that exceeds the maximum safe surge capacity of a process waste water impoundment may be discharged from that impoundment. The height difference between the max-imum safe surge capacity level and the normal operating level must be greater than the inches of rain representing the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event as established by the National Climatic Center, National Oceanic and Atmos-pheric Administration for the locality in which such impoundment is located.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33968, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

Subpart X—Diatomite Subcategory

§ 436.240 Applicability; description of the diatomite subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of diatomite.

§ 436.241 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.242 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraph (b) of this section, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT): there shall be no dis-charge of process generated waste water pollutants into navigable waters.

(b) Only that volume of water result-ing from precipitation that exceeds the maximum safe surge capacity of a process waste water impoundment may

be discharged from that impoundment. The height difference between the max-imum safe surge capacity level and the normal operating level must be greater than the inches of rain representing the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event as established by the National Climatic Center, National Oceanic and Atmos-pheric Administration for the locality in which such impoundment is located.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33968, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

Subpart Y—Jade Subcategory

§ 436.250 Applicability; description of the jade subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of jade.

§ 436.251 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.252 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraph (b) of this section, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT): there shall be no dis-charge of process generated waste water pollutants into navigable waters.

(b) Only that volume of water result-ing from precipitation that exceeds the maximum safe surge capacity of a process waste water impoundment may be discharged from that impoundment. The height difference between the max-imum safe surge capacity level and the normal operating level must be greater than the inches of rain representing the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event as established by the National Climatic

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00367 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

358

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 436.260

Center, National Oceanic and Atmos-pheric Administration for the locality in which such impoundment is located.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33969, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

Subpart Z—Novaculite Subcategory

§ 436.260 Applicability; description of the novaculite subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of novaculite.

§ 436.261 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.262 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraph (b) of this section, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT): There shall be no dis-charge of process generated waste water pollutants into navigable waters.

(b) Only that volume of water result-ing from precipitation that exceeds the maximum safe surge capacity of a process waste water impoundment may be discharged from that impoundment. The height difference between the max-imum safe surge capacity level and the normal operating level must be greater than the inches of rain representing the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event as established by the National Climatic Center, National Oceanic and Atmos-pheric Administration for the locality in which such impoundment is located.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33969, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

Subpart AA—Fire Clay Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart AB—Attapulgite and Montmorillonite Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart AC—Kyanite Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart AD—Shale and Common Clay Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart AE—Aplite Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart AF—Tripoli Subcategory

§ 436.310 Applicability; description of the tripoli subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the processing of tripoli.

§ 436.321 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

§ 436.322 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT): For operations not employing wet processes there shall be no discharge of process generated waste water pollut-ants into navigable waters.

[60 FR 33969, June 29, 1995]

Subpart AG—Kaolin Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart AH—Ball Clay Subcategory [Reserved]

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00368 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8006 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

359

Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 437

Subpart AI—Feldspar Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart AJ—Talc, Steatite, Soap-stone and Pyrophyllite Sub-category [Reserved]

Subpart AK—Garnet Subcategory [Reserved]

Subpart AL—Graphite Subcategory

§ 436.380 Applicability; description of the graphite subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the mining and processing of naturally occurring graphite.

§ 436.381 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term ‘‘mine drainage’’ shall mean any water drained, pumped or si-phoned from a mine.

§ 436.382 Effluent limitations guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraph (b) of this section, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT):

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS ...................................... 20 mg/l 10 mg/l. Total Fe ............................... 2 mg/l 1 mg/l. pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) Only that volume of water result-ing from precipitation that exceeds the

maximum safe surge capacity of a process waste water impoundment may be discharged from that impoundment. The height difference between the max-imum safe surge capacity level and the normal operating level must be greater than the inches of rain representing the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event as established by the National Climatic Center, National Oceanic and Atmos-pheric Administration for the locality in which such impoundment is located.

[40 FR 48657, Oct. 16, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33969, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35796, July 11, 1995]

PART 437—THE CENTRALIZED WASTE TREATMENT POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

Sec. 437.1 General applicability. 437.2 General definitions. 437.3 General pretreatment standards. 437.4 Monitoring requirements.

Subpart A—Metals Treatment and Recovery

437.10 Applicability. 437.11 Effluent limitations attainable by the

application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available (BPT).

437.12 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best conventional pol-lutant control technology (BCT).

437.13 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

437.14 New source performance standards (NSPS).

437.15 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

437.16 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Subpart B—Oils Treatment and Recovery

437.20 Applicability. 437.21 Effluent limitations attainable by the

application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available (BPT).

437.22 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best conventional pol-lutant control technology (BCT).

437.23 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

437.24 New source performance standards (NSPS).

437.25 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00369 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 436 ATTACHMENT F

191

Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 411

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000 lb) of product

BOD5 ..................................... 35 .2 17 .6 COD ....................................... 256 .8 128 .4 TSS ........................................ 55 .4 27 .7 Sulfide .................................... 0 .44 0 .22 Phenol .................................... 0 .22 0 .11 Total chromium ...................... 0 .22 0 .11 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 410.93 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT):

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000 lb) of product

COD ....................................... 256 .8 128 .4 Sulfide .................................... 0 .44 0 .22 Phenols .................................. 0 .22 0 .11 Total Chromium ..................... 0 .22 0 .11

§ 410.94 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

Any existing source subject to this subpart that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403.

§ 410.95 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Any new source subject to this sub-part must achieve the following new source performance standards (NSPS):

Pollutant or pollutant property

NSPS

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000 lb) of product

BOD5 ..................................... 16 .9 8 .7 COD ....................................... 179 .3 115 .5 TSS ........................................ 50 .9 22 .7 Sulfide .................................... 0 .44 0 .22 Phenols .................................. 0 .22 0 .11 Total Chromium ..................... 0 .22 0 .11 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0 at all times. Note: Additional allocations for ‘‘commission finishers’’ are

not available to new sources.

§ 410.96 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Any new source subject to this sub-part that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403.

§ 410.97 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

PART 411—CEMENT MANUFAC-TURING POINT SOURCE CAT-EGORY

Subpart A—Nonleaching Subcategory

Sec. 411.10 Applicability; description of the non-

leaching subcategory. 411.11 Specialized definitions. 411.12 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available.

411.13 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

411.14 Pretreatment standards for existing sources.

411.15 Standards of performance for new sources.

411.16 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

411.17 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00201 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 411ATTACHMENT F

staff
Typewritten Text
staff
Typewritten Text
staff
Text Box
Subpart C only

192

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 411.10

Subpart B—Leaching Subcategory

411.20 Applicability; description of the leaching subcategory.

411.21 Specialized definitions. 411.22 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available.

411.23 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

411.24 Pretreatment standards for existing sources.

411.25 Standards of performance for new sources.

411.26 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

411.27 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the con-ventional pollutant control technology (BCT).

Subpart C—Materials Storage Piles Runoff Subcategory

411.30 Applicability; description of the ma-terials storage piles runoff subcategory.

411.31 Specialized definitions. 411.32 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available.

411.33 [Reserved] 411.34 Pretreatment standards for existing

sources. 411.35 Standards of performance for new

sources. 411.36 Pretreatment standards for new

sources. 411.37 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology.

AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b) and (c), 306 (b) and (c), and 307(c) of the Federal Water Pol-lution Control Act, as amended; 33 U.S.C. 1251, 1311, 1314 (b) and (c), 1316 (b) and (c), and 1317(c); 86 Stat. 816 et seq., Pub. L., 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567, Pub. L. 95–217.

SOURCE: 39 FR 6591, Feb. 20, 1974, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart A—Nonleaching Subcategory

§ 411.10 Applicability; description of the nonleaching subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the process in which several mineral ingredients (limestone or other natural sources of calcium carbonate, silica, alumina, and iron together with gyp-sum) are used in the manufacturing of cement and in which kiln dust is not contracted with water as an integral part of the process and water is not used in wet scrubbers to control kiln stack emissions.

§ 411.11 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

§ 411.12 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations (maximum for any 1 day)

Metric units (kg/kkg of product)

TSS ............................... 0.005. Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet

temperature. pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

English units (lb/1,000 lb of product)

TSS ............................... 0.005. Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet

temperature. pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

[39 FR 6591, Feb. 20, 1974, as amended at 60 FR 33950, June 29, 1995]

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00202 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 411ATTACHMENT F

193

Environmental Protection Agency § 411.20

§ 411.13 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable.

Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations (maximum for any 1 day)

Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet temperature.

[44 FR 50741, Aug. 29, 1979]

§ 411.14 Pretreatment standards for existing sources.

Any existing source subject to this subpart that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403. In addition, the following pretreatment standard establishes the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this section which may be discharged to a publicly owned treatment works by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard

pH ................................................... No limitation. Temperature (heat) ......................... Do. TSS ................................................. Do.

[40 FR 6440, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33951, June 29, 1995]

§ 411.15 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations (maximum for any 1 day)

Metric units (kg/kkg of product)

TSS ............................... 0.005. Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet

temperature.

Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations (maximum for any 1 day)

pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

English units (lb/1,000 lb of product)

TSS ............................... 0.005. Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet

temperature. pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 411.16 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

Any new source subject to this sub-part that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403.

[60 FR 33951, June 29, 1995]

§ 411.17 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best conventional pollutant control technology.

Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations (maximum for any 1 day)

Metric units (kg/kkg of product)

TSS ............................... 0.005. pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

English units (lb/1,000 lb of product)

TSS ............................... 0.005. pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

[44 FR 50741, Aug. 29, 1979]

Subpart B—Leaching Subcategory

§ 411.20 Applicability; description of the leaching subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the process in which several mineral ingredients (limestone or other natural sources of calcium carbonate, silica, alumina, and iron together with gyp-sum) are used in the manufacturing of

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00203 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 411ATTACHMENT F

194

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 411.21

cement and in which kiln dust is con-tacted with water as an integral part of the process or water is used in wet scrubbers to control kiln stack emis-sions.

§ 411.21 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

§ 411.22 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations (maximum for any 1 day)

Metric units (kg/kkg of dust leached)

TSS ............................... 0.4. Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet

temperature. pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

English units (lb/1,000 lb of dust leached)

TSS ............................... 0.4. Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet

temperature. pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

[39 FR 6591, Feb. 20, 1974, as amended at 60 FR 33951, June 29, 1995]

§ 411.23 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable.

Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations (maximum for any 1 day)

Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet temperature.

[44 FR 50741, Aug. 29, 1979]

§ 411.24 Pretreatment standards for existing sources.

Any existing source subject to this subpart that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403. In addition, the following pretreatment standard establishes the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this section which may be discharged to a publicly owned treatment works by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard

pH ................................................... No limitation. BOD5 .............................................. Do. TSS ................................................. Do.

[40 FR 6440, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33951, June 29, 1995]

§ 411.25 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations (maximum for any 1 day)

Metric units (kg/kkg of dust leached)

TSS ............................... 0.4. Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet

temperature. pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

English units (lb/1,000 lb of dust leached)

TSS ............................... 0.4. Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet

temperature. pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 411.26 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

Any new source subject to this sub-part that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00204 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 411ATTACHMENT F

195

Environmental Protection Agency § 411.35

treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403.

[60 FR 33951, June 29, 1995]

§ 411.27 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the conventional pollutant control technology (BCT).

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT): The lim-itations shall be the same as those specified for conventional pollutants (which are defined in § 401.16) in § 411.22 of this subpart for the best practicable control techology currently available (BPT).

[51 FR 24999, July 9, 1986]

Subpart C—Materials Storage Piles Runoff Subcategory

§ 411.30 Applicability; description of the materials storage piles runoff subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the runoff of rainfall which derives from the storage of materials including raw materials, intermediate products, finished products and waste materials which are used in or derived from the manufacture of cement under either Subcategory—A or B.

§ 411.31 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term 10 year, 24 hour rainfall event shall mean a rainfall event with a probable recurrence interval of once in ten years as defined by the National Weather Service in Technical Paper No. 40, ‘‘Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States,’’ May 1961, and sub-sequent amendments, or equivalent re-gional or state rainfall probability in-formation developed therefrom.

§ 411.32 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, and subject to the pro-visions of paragraph (b) of this section, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT):

Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations

TSS ................................................. Not to exceed 50 mg/l. pH ................................................... Within the range 6.0 to

9.0.

(b) Any untreated overflow from fa-cilities designed, constructed and oper-ated to treat the volume of runoff from materials storage piles which is associ-ated with a 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event shall not be subject to the pH and TSS limitations stipulated in para-graph (a) of this section.

[39 FR 6591, Feb. 20, 1974, as amended at 60 FR 33951, June 29, 1995]

§ 411.33 [Reserved]

§ 411.34 Pretreatment standards for existing sources.

Any existing source subject to this subpart that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403. In addition, the following pretreatment standard establishes the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this section which may be discharged to a publicly owned treatment works by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard

pH ................................................... No limitation. TSS ................................................. Do.

[40 FR 6440, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33951, June 29, 1995]

§ 411.35 Standards of performance for new sources.

(a) Subject to the provisions of para-graph (b) of this section the following

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00205 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 411ATTACHMENT F

196

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 411.36

standards of performance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations

TSS ................................ Not to exceed 50 mg/l. pH ................................... Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) Any overflow from facilities de-signed, constructed and operated to treat to the applicable limitations the precipitation and runoff resulting from a 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event shall not be subject to the limitations of this section.

[42 FR 10681, Feb. 23, 1977]

§ 411.36 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

Any new source subject to this sub-part that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403.

[60 FR 33951, June 29, 1995]

§ 411.37 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best conventional pollutant control technology.

(a) Subject to the provisions of para-graph (b) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant prop-erties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology.

Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations

TSS ................................ Not to exceed 50 mg/l. pH ................................... Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) Any untreated overflow from fa-cilities designed, constructed and oper-

ated to treat the volume of runoff from materials storage piles which results from a 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event shall not be subject to the pH and TSS limitations stipulated in paragraph (a) of this section.

[39 FR 6591, Feb. 20, 1974. Redesignated and amended at 44 FR 50741, Aug. 29, 1979]

PART 412—CONCENTRATED ANI-MAL FEEDING OPERATIONS (CAFO) POINT SOURCE CAT-EGORY

Sec. 412.1 General applicability. 412.2 General definitions. 412.3 General pretreatment standards. 412.4 Best management practices (BMPs) for

land application of manure, litter, and process wastewater.

Subpart A—Horses and Sheep

412.10 Applicability. 412.11 [Reserved] 412.12 Effluent limitations attainable by the

application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available (BPT).

412.13 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

412.14 [Reserved] 412.15 New source performance standards

(NSPS).

Subpart B—Ducks

412.20 Applicability. 412.21 Special definitions. 412.22 Effluent limitations attainable by the

application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available (BPT).

412.23–412.24 [Reserved] 412.25 New source performance standards

(NSPS). 412.26 Pretreatment standards for new

sources (PSNS).

Subpart C—Dairy Cows and Cattle Other Than Veal Calves

412.30 Applicability. 412.31 Effluent limitations attainable by the

application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available (BPT).

412.32 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best conventional pol-lutant control technology (BCT).

412.33 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00206 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 411ATTACHMENT F

338

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 417.196

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

English units (pounds per 1,000 lb of anhydrous product)

BOD5 ................................... 0.60 0.30 COD ..................................... 2.70 1.35 TSS ...................................... 0.20 .10 Surfactants ........................... 0.40 .20 Oil and grease ..................... 0.04 .02 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 417.196 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

Any new source subject to this sub-part that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403.

[60 FR 33956, June 29, 1995]

PART 418—FERTILIZER MANUFAC-TURING POINT SOURCE CAT-EGORY

Subpart A—Phosphate Subcategory

Sec. 418.10 Applicability; description of the phos-

phate subcategory. 418.11 Specialized definitions. 418.12 Effluent limitations and guidelines

representing the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology cur-rently available.

418.13 Effluent limitations and guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduc-tion attained by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

418.14 [Reserved] 418.15 Standards of performance for new

sources. 418.16 Pretreatment standards for new

sources. 418.17 Effluent limitations quidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology.

Subpart B—Ammonia Subcategory

418.20 Applicability; description of the am-monia subcategory.

418.21 Specialized definitions. 418.22 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best

practicable control technology currently available.

418.23 Effluent limitations quidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

418.24 [Reserved] 418.25 Standards of performance for new

sources. 418.26 Pretreatment standards for new

sources. 418.27 Effluent limitations quidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology.

Subpart C—Urea Subcategory

418.30 Applicability; description of the urea subcategory.

418.31 Specialized definitions. 418.32 Effluent limitations and guidelines

representing the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology cur-rently available.

418.33 Effluent limitations and guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

418.34 [Reserved] 418.35 Standards of performance for new

sources. 418.36 Pretreatment standards for new

sources.

Subpart D—Ammonium Nitrate Subcategory

418.40 Applicability; description of the am-monium nitrate subcategory.

418.41 Specialized definitions. 418.42 Effluent limitations and guidelines

representing the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology cur-rently available.

418.43 Effluent limitations and guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

418.44 [Reserved] 418.45 Standards of performance for new

sources. 418.46 Pretreatment standards for new

sources.

Subpart E—Nitric Acid Subcategory

418.50 Applicability; description of the ni-tric acid subcategory.

418.51 Specialized definitions. 418.52 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00348 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

staff
Text Box
Subpart A only

339

Environmental Protection Agency § 418.11

attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available.

418.53 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

418.54 [Reserved] 418.55 Standards of performance for new

sources. 418.56 Pretreatment standards for new

sources.

Subpart F—Ammonium Sulfate Production Subcategory

418.60 Applicability; description of the am-monium sulfate production subcategory.

418.61 Specialized definitions. 418.62 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available.

418.63 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

418.64 [Reserved] 418.65 Standards of performance for new

sources. 418.66 Pretreatment standard for new

sources. 418.67 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology.

Subpart G—Mixed and Blend Fertilizer Production Subcategory

418.70 Applicability; description of the mixed and blend fertilizer production subcategory.

418.71 Specialized definitions. 418.72 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available.

418.73 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

418.74 [Reserved] 418.75 Standards of performance for new

sources. 418.76 Pretreatment standard for new

sources. 418.77 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best

conventional pollutant control tech-nology.

AUTHORITY: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.

SOURCE: 39 FR 12836, April 8, 1974, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart A—Phosphate Subcategory

§ 418.10 Applicability; description of the phosphate subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the manufacture of sulfuric acid by sul-fur burning, wet-process phosphoric acid, normal superphosphate, triple superphosphate and ammonium phos-phate, except that the provisions of §§ 418.12, 418.13, and 418.17 shall not apply to wet-process phosphoric acid processes that were under construction either on or before April 8, 1974, at plants located in the State of Lou-isiana.

[52 FR 28432, July 29, 1987]

§ 418.11 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term process wastewater means any water which, during manu-facturing or processing, comes into di-rect contact with or results from the production or use of any raw material, intermediate product, finished product, by-product, or waste product. The term ‘‘process wastewater’’ does not include contaminated non-process wastewater, as defined below.

(c) The term, contaminated non-proc-ess wastewater shall mean any water in-cluding precipitation runoff which, during manufacturing or processing, comes into incidental contact with any raw material, intermediate product, finished product, by-product or waste product by means of: (1) Precipitation runoff; (2) accidental spills; (3) acci-dental leaks caused by the failure of process equipment and which are re-paired or the discharge of pollutants therefrom contained or terminated within the shortest reasonable time which shall not exceed 24 hours after discovery or when discovery should

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00349 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

340

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 418.12

reasonably have been made, whichever is earliest; and (4) discharges from safe-ty showers and related personal safety equipment, and from equipment washings for the purpose of safe entry, inspection and maintenance; provided that all reasonable measures have been taken to prevent, reduce, eliminate and control to the maximum extent fea-sible such contact and provided further that all reasonable measures have been taken that will mitigate the effects of such contact once it has occurred.

(d) The term ten-year 24-hour rainfall event shall mean the maximum 24-hour precipitation event with a probable re-currence interval of once in 10 years as defined by the National Weather Serv-ice in technical paper No. 40, ‘‘Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States’’, May 1961, and subsequent amendments in effect as of the effective date of this regulation.

(e) The term 25-year 24-hour rainfall event shall mean the maximum 24-hour precipitation event with a probable re-currence interval of once in 25 years as defined by the National Weather Serv-ice in technical paper No. 40, ‘‘Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States’’, May 1961, and subsequent amendments in effect, as of the effective date of this regulation.

(f) The term calcium sulfate storage pile runoff shall mean the calcium sul-fate transport water runoff from or through the calcium sulfate pile, and the precipitation which falls directly on the storage pile and which may be collected in a seepage ditch at the base of the outer slopes of the storage pile, provided such seepage ditch is pro-tected from the incursion of surface runoff from areas outside of the outer perimeter of the seepage ditch.

[39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 41 FR 20583, May 19, 1976]

§ 418.12 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-

cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) Subject to the provisions of para-graphs (b) and (c) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best practicable control technology currently available: There shall be no discharge of process wastewater pollut-ants to navigable waters.

(b) Process wastewater pollutants from a calcium sulfate storage pile runoff facility operated separately or in combination with a water recircula-tion system designed, constructed and operated to maintain a surge capacity equal to the runoff from the 10-year, 24- hour rainfall event may be discharged, after treatment to the standards set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, whenever chronic or catastrophic pre-cipitation events cause the water level to rise into the surge capacity. Process wastewater must be treated and dis-charged whenever the water level equals or exceeds the mid point of the surge capacity.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process wastewater pur-suant to the limitations of paragraph (b) shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride ................................ 75 25 TSS ...................................... 150 50

The total suspended solid limitation set forth in this paragraph shall be waived for process wastewater from a calcium sulfate storage pile runoff fa-cility, operated separately or in com-bination with a water recirculation system, which is chemically treated and then clarified or settled to meet the other pollutant limitations set forth in this paragraph.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00350 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

341

Environmental Protection Agency § 418.15

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged in contaminated non-proc-ess wastewater shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride ................................ 75 25

[39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 41 FR 20584, May 19, 1976; 42 FR 16141, Mar. 25, 1977; 60 FR 33956, June 29, 1995]

§ 418.13 Effluent limitations and guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attained by the ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties which may be dis-charged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable:

(a) Subject to the provision of para-graphs (b) and (c) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable: There shall be no discharge of process wastewater pollutants to navigable waters.

(b) Process wastewater pollutants from a calcium sulfate storage pile runoff facility operated separately or in combination with a water recircula-tion system designed, constructed and operated to maintain a surge capacity equal to the runoff from the 25-year, 24- hour rainfall event may be discharged, after treatment to the standards set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, whenever chronic or catastrophic pre-cipitation events cause the water level to rise into the surge capacity. Process wastewater must be treated and dis-charged whenever the water level equals or exceeds the midpoint of the surge capacity.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process wastewater pur-

suant to the limitations of paragraph (b) of this section shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride ................................ 75 25

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged in contaminated non-proc-ess wastewater shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride ................................ 75 25

[39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 41 FR 20584, May 19, 1976; 44 FR 50742, Aug. 29, 1979; 45 FR 37199, June 2, 1980]

§ 418.14 [Reserved]

§ 418.15 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

(a) Subject to the provision of para-graphs (b) and (c) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available demonstrated control technology: There shall be no discharge of process wastewater pollutants to navigable waters.

(b) Process wastewater pollutants from a calcium sulfate storage pile runoff facility operated separately or in combination with a water recircula-tion system designed, constructed and operated to maintain a surge capacity equal to the runoff from the 25-year, 24- hour rainfall event may be discharged, after treatment to the standards set

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00351 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

342

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 418.16

forth in paragraph (c) of this section, whenever chronic or catastrophic pre-cipitation events cause the water level to rise into the surge capacity. Process wastewater must be treated and dis-charged whenever the water level equals or exceeds the midpoint of the surge capacity.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process wastewater pur-suant to the limitations of paragraph (b) shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride ................................ 75 25 TSS ...................................... 150 50

The total suspended solid limitation set forth in this paragraph shall be waived for process wastewater from a calcium sulfate storage pile runoff fa-cility, operated separately or in com-bination with a water recirculation system, which is chemically treated and then clarified or settled to meet the other pollutant limitations set forth in this paragraph.

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged in contaminated non-proc-ess wastewater shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride ................................ 75 25

[39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 41 FR 20584, May 19, 1976; 42 FR 16141, Mar. 25, 1977]

§ 418.16 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

The pretreatment standards under section 307(c) of the Act for a source within the phosphate subcategory, which is a user of a publicly owned treatment works (and which would be a new source subject to section 306 of the Act, if it were to discharge pollutants

to the navigable waters), shall be the standard set forth in 40 CFR part 128, except that, for the purpose of this sec-tion, 40 CFR 128.133 shall be amended to read as follows:

In addition to the prohibitions set forth in 40 CFR 128.131, the pretreatment standard for incompatible pollutants introduced into a publicly owned treatment works shall be as follows: There shall be no discharge of proc-ess waste water pollutants.

§ 418.17 Effluent limitations quidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties which may be dis-charged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best conventional pol-lutant control technology:

(a) Subject to the provision of para-graphs (b) and (c) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best conventional pollutant control technology: There shall be no discharge of process wastewater pollutants to navigable waters.

(b) Process wastewater pollutants from a calcium sulfate storage pile runoff facility operated separately or in combination with a water recircula-tion system designed, constructed and operated to maintain a surge capacity equal to the runoff from the 25-year, 24- hour rainfall event may be discharged, after treatment to the standards set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, whenever chronic or catastrophic pre-cipitation events cause the water level to rise into the surge capacity. Process wastewater must be treated and dis-charged whenever the water level equals or exceeds the midpoint of the surge capacity.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process wastewater pur-suant to the limitations of paragraph (b) of this section shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00352 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

343

Environmental Protection Agency § 418.22

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS ...................................... 150 50

The total suspended solid limitations set forth in this paragraph shall be waived for process wastewater from a calcium sulfate sulfate storage pile runoff facility, operated separately or in combination with a water recircula-tion system, which is chemically treat-ed and then clarified or settled to meet the other pollutant limitations set forth in this § 418.13 (c).

[44 FR 50742, Aug. 29, 1979; 45 FR 37199, June 2, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 24999, July 9, 1986]

Subpart B—Ammonia Subcategory

§ 418.20 Applicability; description of the ammonia subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the manufacture of ammonia. Dis-charges attributable to shipping losses and cooling tower blowdown are ex-cluded.

[44 FR 64081, Nov. 6, 1979]

§ 418.21 Specialized definitions. For the purposes of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term product shall mean the anhydrous ammonia content of the compound manufactured.

(c) The term shipping losses shall mean: Discharges resulting from load-ing tank cars or tank trucks; dis-charges resulting from cleaning tank cars or tank trucks; and discharges from air pollution control scrubbers de-signed to control emissions from load-ing or cleaning tank cars or tank trucks.

(d) The term process wastewater shall mean any water which, during manu-facturing or processing, comes into di-rect contact with or results from the production or use of any raw material, intermediate product, finished product,

by-product, or waste product. The term process wastewater does not include non-contact cooling water, as defined below.

(e) The term non-contact cooling water shall mean water which is used in a cooling system designed so as to main-tain constant separation of the cooling medium from all contact with process chemicals but which may on the occa-sion of corrosion, cooling system leak-age or similar cooling system failures contain small amounts of process chemicals: Provided, That all reason-able measures have been taken to pre-vent, reduce, eliminate and control to the maximum extent feasible such con-tamination: And provided further, That all reasonable measures have been taken that will mitigate the effects of such contamination once it has oc-curred.

[44 FR 64082, Nov. 6, 1979]

§ 418.22 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 kg of product)

Ammonia (as N) ................... 0.1875 0.0625 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

English units (pounds per 1,000 lb of product)

Ammonia (as N) ................... 0.1875 0.0625 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

[39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 40 FR 26275, June 23, 1975: 60 FR 33956, June 29, 1995]

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00353 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

344

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 418.23

§ 418.23 Effluent limitations quidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, the following limita-tions establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable.

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 kg of product)

Ammonia (as N) ................ 0 .05 0 .025

English units (pounds per 1,000 lb of product)

Ammonia (as N) ................ 0 .05 0 .025

[51 FR 24999, July 9, 1986]

§ 418.24 [Reserved]

§ 418.25 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 kg of product)

Ammonia (as N) ................... 0.11 0.055 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

English units (pounds per 1,000 lb of product)

Ammonia (as N) ................... 0.11 0.055 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 418.26 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

The pretreatment standards under section 307(c) of the Act for a source within the ammonia subcategory, which is a user of a publicly owned treatment works (and which would be a new source subject to section 306 of the Act, if it were to discharge pollutants to the navigable waters), shall be the standard set forth in 40 CFR part 128, except that, for the purpose of this sec-tion, 40 CFR 128.133 shall be amended to read as follows:

In addition to the prohibitions set forth in 40 CFR 128.131, the pretreatment standard for incompatible pollutants introduced into a publicly owned treatment works shall be the standard of performance for new sources specified in 40 CFR 418.25; provided that, if the publicly owned treatment works which receives the pollutants is committed, in its NPDES permit, to remove a specified per-centage of any incompatible pollutant, the pretreatment standard applicable to users of such treatment works shall be correspond-ingly reduced in stringency for that pollut-ant.

§ 418.27 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best conventional pollutant control technology.

Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations

pH ................................... Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

[44 FR 50742, Aug. 29, 1979]

Subpart C—Urea Subcategory

§ 418.30 Applicability; description of the urea subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to the manufacture of urea. Discharges attributable to shipping losses and precipitation runoff from outside the battery limits of the urea

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00354 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

345

Environmental Protection Agency § 418.33

manufacturing operations, and cooling tower blowdown are excluded.

(Sec. 306(b), Federal Water Pollution Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1316(c)))

[43 FR 17826, Apr. 26, 1978]

§ 418.31 Specialized definitions.

For the purposes of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term product shall mean the 100 percent urea content of the mate-rial manufactured.

(Sec. 306(b), Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1316(c)))

[43 FR 17826, Apr. 26, 1978]

§ 418.32 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) The following limitations con-stitute the maximum permissible dis-charge for urea manufacturing oper-ations in which urea is produced as a solution product:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.95 0.48 Organic nitrogen (as N) ....... 0.61 0.33

NOTE: Metric units: Kilogram/1,000 kg of product; English units: Pound/1,000 lb of product.

(b) The following limitations con-stitute the maximum permissible dis-charge for urea manufacturing oper-ations in which urea is prilled or gran-ulated:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 1.18 0.59 Organic nitrogen (as N) ....... 1.48 0.80

NOTE: Metric units: Kilogram/1,000 kg of product; English units: Pound/1,000 lb of product.

(Sec. 306(b), Federal Water Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1316(c)))

[39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 43 FR 17826, Apr. 26, 1978; 44 FR 9388, Feb. 13, 1979; 60 FR 33956, June 29, 1995]

§ 418.33 Effluent limitations and guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achiev-able.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable:

(a) The following limitations con-stitute the maximum permissible dis-charge for urea manufacturing oper-ations in which urea is produced as a solution product:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.53 0.27 Organic nitrogen (as N) ....... 0.45 0.24

NOTE: Metric units: Kilogram/1,000 kg of product; English units: Pound/1,000 lb of product.

(b) The following limitations con-stitute the maximum permissible dis-charge for urea manufacturing oper-ations in which urea is prilled or gran-ulated:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.53 0.27 Organic nitrogen (as N) ....... .86 .46

NOTE: Metric units: Kilogram/1,000 kg of product; English units: Pound/1,000 lb of product.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00355 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

346

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 418.34

(Sec. 306(b), Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1316(c)))

[43 FR 17826, Apr. 26, 1978]

§ 418.34 [Reserved]

§ 418.35 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

(a) The following limitations con-stitute the maximum permissible dis-charge for urea manufacturing oper-ations in which urea is produced as a solution product:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.53 0.27 Organic nitrogen (as N) ....... .45 .24

NOTE: Metric units: Kilogram/1,000 kg of product; English units: Pound/1,000 lb of product.

(b) The following limitations con-stitute the maximum permissible dis-charge for urea manufacturing oper-ations in which urea is prilled or gran-ulated:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limitations (mg/l)

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.53 0.27 Organic nitrogen (as N) ....... .86 .46

NOTE: Metric units: Kilogram/1,000 kg of product; English units: Pound/1,000 lb of product.

(Sec. 306(b), Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1316(c)))

[39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 43 FR 17827, Apr. 26, 1978; 44 FR 9388, Feb. 13, 1979]

§ 418.36 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

The pretreatment standards under section 307(c) of the Act for a source within the urea subcategory, which is a user of a publicly owned treatment works (and which would be a new source subject to section 306 of the Act, if it were to discharge pollutants to the

navigable waters), shall be the stand-ard set forth in 40 CFR part 128, except that, for the purpose of this section, 40 CFR 128.133 shall be amended to read as follows:

In addition to the prohibitions set forth in 40 CFR 128.131, the pretreatment standard for incompatible pollutants introduced into pub-licly owned treatment works shall be the standard of performance for new sources specified in 40 CFR 418.35; Provided, That, if the publicly owned treatment works which receives the pollutants is committed, in its NPDES permit, to remove a specified per-centage of any incompatible pollutant, the pretreatment standard applicable to users of such treatment works shall be correspond-ingly reduced in stringency for that pollut-ant.

Subpart D—Ammonium Nitrate Subcategory

§ 418.40 Applicability; description of the ammonium nitrate subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the manufacture of ammonium nitrate. Discharges attributable to shipping losses, precipitation runoff from out-side the battery limits of the ammo-nium nitrate manufacturing oper-ations, cooling tower blowdown, and discharges from plants which totally condense their neutralizer overheads are excluded.

(Sec. 306(b), Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1316(c)))

[43 FR 17827, Apr. 26, 1978]

§ 418.41 Specialized definitions.

For the purposes of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term product shall mean the 100 percent ammonium nitrate content of the material manufactured.

(Sec. 306(b), Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1316(c)))

[43 FR 17828, Apr. 26, 1978]

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00356 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

347

Environmental Protection Agency § 418.46

§ 418.42 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.73 0.39 Nitrate (as N) ....................... .67 .37

NOTE: Metric units: kilogram/1,000 kg of products; English units: pound/1,000 lb of product.

(Sec. 306(b), Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1316(c)))

[43 FR 17827, Apr. 26, 1978, as amended at 44 FR 9388, Feb. 13, 1979; 60 FR 33956, June 29, 1995]

§ 418.43 Effluent limitations and guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achiev-able.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.08 0.04 Nitrate (as N) ....................... .12 .07

NOTE: Metric units: kilogram/1,000 kg of products; English units: pound/1,000 lb of product.

(Sec. 306(b), Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1316(c)))

[43 FR 17828, Apr. 26, 1978]

§ 418.44 [Reserved]

§ 418.45 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.08 0.04 Nitrate (as N) ....................... .12 .07

NOTE: Metric units: kilogram/1,000 kg of product; English units: pound/1,000 lb of product.

(Sec. 306(b), Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1316(c)))

[43 FR 17828, Apr. 26, 1978, as amended at 44 FR 9388, Feb. 13, 1979]

§ 418.46 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

The pretreatment standards under section 307(c) of the Act for a source within the ammonium nitrate sub-category, which is a user of a publicly owned treatment works (and which would be a new source subject to sec-tion 306 of the Act, if it were to dis-charge pollutants to the navigable wa-ters), shall be the standard set forth in 40 CFR part 128, except that, for the purpose of this section, 40 CFR 128.133 shall be amended to read as follows:

In addition to the prohibitions set forth in 40 CFR 128.131, the pretreatment standard for incompatible pollutants introduced into a publicly owned treatment works shall be the standard of performance for new sources specified in 40 CFR 418.45; Provided, That, if the publicly owned treatment works which receives the pollutants in committed, in its NPDES permit, to remove a specified per-centage of any incompatible pollutant, the pretreatment standard applicable to users of such treatment works shall be correspond-ingly reduced in stringency for that pollut-ant.

EDITORIAL NOTE: Section 418.46 was sus-pended until further notice at 40 FR 26275, June 23, 1975, effective July 20, 1975.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00357 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

348

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 418.50

Subpart E—Nitric Acid Subcategory

§ 418.50 Applicability; description of the nitric acid subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from production of nitric acid in concentra-tions up to 68 percent. Discharges from shipping losses are excluded.

[41 FR 2387, Jan. 1, 1976]

§ 418.51 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term product shall mean ni-tric acid on the basis of 100 percent HNO3.

(c) The term shipping losses shall mean: Discharges resulting from load-ing tank cars or tank trucks; dis-charges resulting from cleaning tank cars or tank trucks; and discharges from air pollution control scrubbers de-signed to control emissions from load-ing or cleaning tank cars or tank trucks.

(d) The term shipped liquid ammonia shall mean liquid ammonia commer-cially shipped for which the Depart-ment of Transportation requires 0.2 percent minimum water content.

(e) The term non-contact cooling water shall mean water which is used in a cooling system designed so as to main-tain constant separation of the cooling medium from all contact with process chemicals but which may on the occa-sion of corrosion, cooling system leak-age or similar cooling system failures contain small amounts of process chemicals: Provided, That all reason-able measures have been taken to pre-vent, reduce, eliminate and control to the maximum extent feasible such con-tamination: And provided further, That all reasonable measures have been taken that will mitigate the effects of such contamination once it has oc-curred.

[39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 41 FR 2387, Jan. 16, 1976]

§ 418.52 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) The following limitations estab-lish the quantity or quality of pollut-ants which may be discharged in proc-ess waste water from nitric acid pro-duction in which all the raw material ammonia is in the gaseous form:

[Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of product]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.007 0.0007 Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.33 0.044

(b) The following limitations estab-lish the quantity or quality of pollut-ants which may be discharged in proc-ess waste water from nitric acid pro-duction in which all the raw material ammonia is in the shipped liquid form:

[Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of product]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.08 0.008 Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.33 0.044

[39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 41 FR 2387, Jan. 16, 1976; 42 FR 16141, Mar. 25, 1977; 60 FR 33956, June 29, 1995]

§ 418.53 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties which may be dis-charged by a point source subject to

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00358 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

349

Environmental Protection Agency § 418.56

the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable:

(a) The following limitations estab-lish the quantity or quality of pollut-ants which may be discharged in proc-ess waste water from nitric acid pro-duction in which all the raw material ammonia is in the gaseous form:

[Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of product]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.0045 0.00045 Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.17 0.023

(b) The following limitations estab-lish the quantity or quality of pollut-ants which may be discharged in proc-ess waste water from nitric acid pro-duction in which all the raw material ammonia is in the shipped liquid form:

[Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of product]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.08 0.008 Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.17 0.023

[41 FR 2387, Jan. 16, 1976, as amended at 42 FR 16141, Mar. 25, 1977]

§ 418.54 [Reserved]

§ 418.55 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

(a) The following limitations estab-lish the quantity or quality of pollut-ants which may be discharged in proc-ess waste water from nitric acid pro-duction in which all the raw material ammonia is in the gaseous form:

[Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of product]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.0045 0.00045 Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.17 0.023

(b) The following limitations estab-lish the quantity or quality of pollut-ants which may be discharged in proc-ess waste water from nitric acid pro-duction in which all the raw material ammonia is in the shipped liquid form:

[Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of product]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.08 0.008 Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.17 0.023

[41 FR 2387, Jan. 16, 1976, as amended at 42 FR 16141, Mar. 25, 1977]

§ 418.56 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

The pretreatment standards under section 307(c) of the Act for a source within the nitric acid subcategory, which is a user of a publicly owned treatment works (and which would be a new source subject to section 306 of the Act, if it were to discharge pollutants to the navigable waters), shall be the standard set forth in part 128 of this chapter, except that, for the purpose of this section, § 128.133 of this chapter shall be amended to read as follows: In addition to the prohibitions set forth in § 128.131 of this chapter, the fol-lowing pretreatment standard estab-lishes the quantity or quality of pollut-ants or pollutant properties controlled by this section which may be dis-charged to publicly owned treatment works by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

(a) The following limitations estab-lish the quantity or quality of pollut-ants which may be discharged in proc-ess waste water from nitric acid pro-duction in which all the raw material ammonia is in the gaseous form:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00359 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

350

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 418.60

[Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of product]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.0045 0.00045 Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.17 0.023

(b) The following limitations estab-lish the quantity or quality of pollut-ants which may be discharged in proc-ess waste water from nitric acid pro-duction in which all the raw material ammonia is in the shipped liquid form:

[Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of product]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.08 0.008 Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.17 0.023

[41 FR 2388, Jan. 16, 1976, as amended at 42 FR 16141, Mar. 25, 1977]

Subpart F—Ammonium Sulfate Production Subcategory

SOURCE: 40 FR 2652, Jan. 14, 1975, unless otherwise noted.

§ 418.60 Applicability; description of the ammonium sulfate production subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart apply to discharges resulting from the pro-duction of ammonium sulfate by the synthetic process and by coke oven by- product recovery. The provisions of this subpart do not apply to ammo-nium sulfate produced as a by-product of caprolactam production.

§ 418.61 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

(b) [Reserved]

§ 418.62 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT): There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

[60 FR 33956, June 29, 1995]

§ 418.63 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable: There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

§ 418.64 [Reserved]

§ 418.65 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart: There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

§ 418.66 Pretreatment standard for new sources.

The pretreatment standard under section 307(c) of the Act for a new source within the ammonium sulfate subcategory which is a user of a pub-licly owned treatment works and a major contributing industry as defined in 40 CFR part 128 (and which would be a new source subject to section 306 of the Act, if it were to discharge pollut-ants to the navigable waters), shall be

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00360 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

351

Environmental Protection Agency § 418.76

the same standard as set forth in 40 CFR part 128, for existing sources, ex-cept that, for the purpose of this sec-tion, 40 CFR 128.121, 128.122, 128.132 and 128.133 shall not apply. The following pretreatment standard establishes the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this section which may be discharged to a publicly owned treatment works by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard

BOD5 .............................................. No limitation. TSS ................................................. Do. pH ................................................... Do. Ammonia (as N) ............................. 30 mg/l.

§ 418.67 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, which may be dis-charged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best conventional pol-lutant control technology: There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

[44 FR 50742, Aug. 29, 1979]

Subpart G—Mixed and Blend Fertilizer Production Subcategory

SOURCE: 40 FR 2652, Jan. 14, 1975, unless otherwise noted.

§ 418.70 Applicability; description of the mixed and blend fertilizer pro-duction subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the production of mixed fertilizer and blend fertilizer.

§ 418.71 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term mixed fertilizer shall mean a mixture of wet and/or dry straight fertilizer materials, mixed fer-tilizer materials, fillers and additives

prepared through chemical reaction to a given formulation.

(c) The term blend fertilizer shall mean a mixture of dry, straight and mixed fertilizer materials.

§ 418.72 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT): There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

[60 FR 33957, June 29, 1995]

§ 418.73 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable: There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

§ 418.74 [Reserved]

§ 418.75 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart: There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

§ 418.76 Pretreatment standard for new sources.

The pretreatment standard under section 307(c) of the Act for a new source within the mixed and blend fer-tilizer subcategory which is a user of a publicly owned treatment works and a

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00361 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

352

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 418.77

major contributing industry as defined in 40 CFR part 128 (and which would be a new source subject to section 306 of the Act, if it were to discharge pollut-ants to the navigable waters), shall be the same standard as set forth in 40 CFR part 128, for existing sources, ex-cept that, for the purpose of this sec-tion, 40 CFR 128.121, 128.122, 128.132 and 128.133 shall not apply. The following pretreatment standard establishes the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this section which may be discharged to a publicly owned treatment works by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard

BOD5 .............................................. No limitations. TSS ................................................. Do. pH ................................................... Do. Ammonia (as N) ............................. 30 mg/l. Nitrate (as N) .................................. Do. Total phosphorus (as P) ................. 35 mg/l.

§ 418.77 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, which may be dis-charged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best conventional pol-lutant control technology: There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

[44 FR 50742, Aug. 29, 1979]

PART 419—PETROLEUM REFINING POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

Subpart A—Topping Subcategory

Sec. 419.10 Applicability; description of the top-

ping subcategory. 419.11 Specialized definitions. 419.12 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

419.13 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

419.14 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

419.15 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

419.16 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

419.17 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Subpart B—Cracking Subcategory

419.20 Applicability; description of the cracking subcategory.

419.21 Specialized definitions. 419.22 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

419.23 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

419.24 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

419.25 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

419.26 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

419.27 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Subpart C—Petrochemical Subcategory

419.30 Applicability; description of the pe-trochemical subcategory.

419.31 Specialized definitions. 419.32 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available.

419.33 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

419.34 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

419.35 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

419.36 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

419.37 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00362 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 418 ATTACHMENT F

645

Environmental Protection Agency § 423.11

section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the standards of performance for new sources: [Metric units (kg/kkg of product); English units (lb/1,000 lb of

product)]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS ...................................... 0.35 0.18 Total phosphorus (as P) ...... .56 .28 Fluoride (as F) ..................... .21 .11 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

§ 422.66 [Reserved]

§ 422.67 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, the following limita-tions establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best conventional pollutant control technology: [Metric units (kg/kkg of product); English units (lb/1,000 lb of

product)]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS .................................... 0 .35 0 .18 pH ...................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

[51 FR 25000, July 9, 1986]

PART 423—STEAM ELECTRIC POWER GENERATING POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

Sec. 423.10 Applicability. 423.11 Specialized definitions. 423.12 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

423.13 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

423.14 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT). [Reserved]

423.15 New source performance standards (NSPS).

423.16 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

423.17 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

APPENDIX A TO PART 423—126 PRIORITY POL-LUTANTS

AUTHORITY: Secs. 301; 304(b), (c), (e), and (g); 306(b) and (c); 307(b) and (c); and 501, Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, as amended by Clean Water Act of 1977) (the ‘‘Act’’; 33 U.S.C. 1311; 1314(b), (c), (e), and (g); 1316(b) and (c); 1317(b) and (c); and 1361; 86 Stat. 816, Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567, Pub. L. 95–217), unless otherwise noted.

SOURCE: 47 FR 52304, Nov. 19, 1982, unless otherwise noted.

§ 423.10 Applicability.

The provisions of this part are appli-cable to discharges resulting from the operation of a generating unit by an es-tablishment primarily engaged in the generation of electricity for distribu-tion and sale which results primarily from a process utilizing fossil-type fuel (coal, oil, or gas) or nuclear fuel in con-junction with a thermal cycle employ-ing the steam water system as the thermodynamic medium.

§ 423.11 Specialized definitions.

In addition to the definitions set forth in 40 CFR part 401, the following definitions apply to this part:

(a) The term total residual chlorine (or total residual oxidants for intake water with bromides) means the value obtained using the amperometric method for total residual chlorine de-scribed in 40 CFR part 136.

(b) The term low volume waste sources means, taken collectively as if from one source, wastewater from all sources except those for which specific limitations are otherwise established in this part. Low volume wastes sources include, but are not limited to:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00655 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 423 ATTACHMENT F

646

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 423.12

wastewaters from wet scrubber air pol-lution control systems, ion exchange water treatment system, water treat-ment evaporator blowdown, laboratory and sampling streams, boiler blow-down, floor drains, cooling tower basin cleaning wastes, and recirculating house service water systems. Sanitary and air conditioning wastes are not in-cluded.

(c) The term chemical metal cleaning waste means any wastewater resulting from the cleaning of any metal process equipment with chemical compounds, including, but not limited to, boiler tube cleaning.

(d) The term metal cleaning waste means any wastewater resulting from cleaning [with or without chemical cleaning compounds] any metal process equipment including, but not limited to, boiler tube cleaning, boiler fireside cleaning, and air preheater cleaning.

(e) The term fly ash means the ash that is carried out of the furnace by the gas stream and collected by me-chanical precipitators, electrostatic precipitators, and/or fabric filters. Economizer ash is included when it is collected with fly ash.

(f) The term bottom ash means the ash that drops out of the furnace gas stream in the furnace and in the econo-mizer sections. Economizer ash is in-cluded when it is collected with bottom ash.

(g) The term once through cooling water means water passed through the main cooling condensers in one or two passes for the purpose of removing waste heat.

(h) The term recirculated cooling water means water which is passed through the main condensers for the purpose of removing waste heat, passed through a cooling device for the purpose of re-moving such heat from the water and then passed again, except for blow-down, through the main condenser.

(i) The term 10 year, 24/hour rainfall event means a rainfall event with a probable recurrence interval of once in ten years as defined by the National Weather Service in Technical Paper No. 40. Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States, May 1961 or equivalent regional rainfall probability informa-tion developed therefrom.

(j) The term blowdown means the minimum discharge of recirculating water for the purpose of discharging materials contained in the water, the further buildup of which would cause concentration in amounts exceeding limits established by best engineering practices.

(k) The term average concentration as it relates to chlorine discharge means the average of analyses made over a single period of chlorine release which does not exceed two hours.

(l) The term free available chlorine shall mean the value obtained using the amperometric titration method for free available chlorine described in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, page 112 (13th edition).

(m) The term coal pile runoff means the rainfall runoff from or through any coal storage pile.

§ 423.12 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

(a) In establishing the limitations set forth in this section, EPA took into ac-count all information it was able to collect, develop and solicit with re-spect to factors (such as age and size of plant, utilization of facilities, raw ma-terials, manufacturing processes, non- water quality environmental impacts, control and treatment technology available, energy requirements and costs) which can affect the industry subcategorization and effluent levels established. It is, however, possible that data which would affect these lim-itations have not been available and, as a result, these limitations should be adjusted for certain plants in this in-dustry. An individual discharger or other interested person may submit evidence to the Regional Adminis-trator (or to the State, if the State has the authority to issue NPDES permits) that factors relating to the equipment or facilities involved, the process ap-plied, or other such factors related to such discharger are fundamentally dif-ferent from the factors considered in the establishment of the guidelines. On the basis of such evidence or other available information, the Regional

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00656 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 423 ATTACHMENT F

647

Environmental Protection Agency § 423.12

Administrator (or the State) will make a written finding that such factors are or are not fundamentally different for that facility compared to those speci-fied in the Development Document. If such fundamentally different factors are found to exist, the Regional Admin-istrator or the State shall establish for the discharger effluent limitations in the NPDES Permit either more or less stringent than the limitations estab-lished herein, to the extent dictated by such fundamentally different factors. Such limitations must be approved by the Administrator of the Environ-mental Protection Agency. The Admin-istrator may approve or disapprove such limitations, specify other limita-tions, or initiate proceedings to revise these regulations. The phrase ‘‘other such factors’’ appearing above may in-clude significant cost differentials. In no event may a discharger’s impact on receiving water quality be considered as a factor under this paragraph.

(b) Any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the fol-lowing effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion by the application of the best practicable control technology cur-rently available (BPT):

(1) The pH of all discharges, except once through cooling water, shall be within the range of 6.0–9.0.

(2) There shall be no discharge of pol-ychlorinated biphenyl compounds such as those commonly used for trans-former fluid.

(3) The quantity of pollutants dis-charged from low volume waste sources shall not exceed the quantity deter-mined by multiplying the flow of low volume waste sources times the con-centration lised in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day (mg/l)

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

(mg/l)

TSS ............................................ 100.0 30.0 Oil and grease ........................... 20.0 15.0

(4) The quantity of pollutants dis-charged in fly ash and bottom ash transport water shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying

the flow of fly ash and bottom ash transport water times the concentra-tion listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day (mg/l)

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

(mg/l)

TSS ............................................ 100.0 30.0 Oil and grease ........................... 20.0 15.0

(5) The quantity of pollutants dis-charged in metal cleaning wastes shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of metal cleaning wastes times the concentration listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day (mg/l)

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

(mg/l)

TSS ............................................ 100.0 30.0 Oil and grease ........................... 20.0 15.0 Copper, total .............................. 1.0 1.0 Iron, total ................................... 1.0 1.0

(6) The quantity of pollutants dis-charged in once through cooling water shall not exceed the quantity deter-mined by multiplying the flow of once through cooling water sources times the concentation listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations

Maximum concentra-tion (mg/l)

Average concentra-tion (mg/l)

Free available chlorine .............. 0.5 0.2

(7) The quantity of pollutants dis-charged in cooling tower blowdown shall not exceed the quantity deter-mined by multiplying the flow of cool-ing tower blowdown sources times the concentration listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations

Maximum concentra-tion (mg/l)

Average concentra-tion (mg/l)

Free available chlorine .............. 0.5 0.2

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00657 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 423 ATTACHMENT F

648

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 423.13

(8) Neither free available chlorine nor total residual chlorine may be dis-charged from any unit for more than two hours in any one day and not more than one unit in any plant may dis-charge free available or total residual chlorine at any one time unless the utility can demonstrate to the Re-gional Administrator or State, if the State has NPDES permit issuing au-thority, that the units in a particular location cannot operate at or below this level or chlorination.

(9) Subject to the provisions of para-graph (b)(10) of this section, the fol-lowing effluent limitations shall apply to the point source discharges of coal pile runoff:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations

Maximum concentration for any time (mg/l)

TSS ................................................ 50

(10) Any untreated overflow from fa-cilities designed, constructed, and op-erated to treat the volume of coal pile runoff which is associated with a 10 year, 24 hour rainfall event shall not be subject to the limitations in paragraph (b)(9) of this section.

(11) At the permitting authority’s discretion, the quantity of pollutant allowed to be discharged may be ex-pressed as a concentration limitation instead of the mass based limitations specified in paragraphs (b)(3) through (7) of this section. Concentration limi-tations shall be those concentrations specified in this section.

(12) In the event that waste streams from various sources are combined for treatment or discharge, the quantity of each pollutant or pollutant property controlled in paragraphs (b)(1) through (11) of this section attributable to each controlled waste source shall not ex-ceed the specified limitations for that waste source.

(The information collection requirements contained in paragraph (a) were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2000–0194)

[47 FR 52304, Nov. 19, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 31404, July 8, 1983]

§ 423.13 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this part must achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

(a) There shall be no discharge of pol-ychlorinated biphenyl compounds such as those commonly used for trans-former fluid.

(b)(1) For any plant with a total rated electric generating capacity of 25 or more megawatts, the quantity of pollutants discharged in once through cooling water from each discharge point shall not exceed the quantity de-termined by multiplying the flow of once through cooling water from each discharge point times the concentra-tion listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT Effluent Limitations

Maximum concentration (mg/l)

Total residual chlorine ................... 0.20

(2) Total residual chlorine may not be discharged from any single gener-ating unit for more than two hours per day unless the discharger demonstrates to the permitting authority that dis-charge for more than two hours is re-quired for macroinvertebrate control. Simultaneous multi-unit chlorination is permitted.

(c)(1) For any plant with a total rated generating capacity of less than 25 megawatts, the quantity of pollut-ants discharged in once through cool-ing water shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of once through cooling water sources times the concentration listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations

Maximum concentra-tion (mg/l)

Average concentra-tion (mg/l)

Free available chlorine .............. 0.5 0.2

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00658 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 423 ATTACHMENT F

649

Environmental Protection Agency § 423.13

(2) Neither free available chlorine nor total residual chlorine may be dis-charged from any unit for more than two hours in any one day and not more than one unit in any plant may dis-charge free available or total residual chlorine at any one time unless the utility can demonstrate to the Re-gional Administrator or State, if the State has NPDES permit issuing au-thority, that the units in a particular location cannot operate at or below this level of chlorination.

(d)(1) The quantity of pollutants dis-charged in cooling tower blowdown shall not exceed the quantity deter-mined by multiplying the flow of cool-ing tower blowdown times the con-centration listed below:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations

Maximum concentra-tion (mg/l)

Average concentra-tion (mg/l)

Free available chlorine .............. 0.5 0.2

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day ¥(mg/l)

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

=(mg/l)

The 126 priority pollutants (Ap-pendix A) contained in chemi-cals added for cooling tower maintenance, except: (1) (1)

Chromium, total .................. 0.2 0.2 Zinc, total ............................ 1.0 1.0

1 No detectable amount.

(2) Neither free available chlorine nor total residual chlorine may be dis-charged from any unit for more than two hours in any one day and not more than one unit in any plant may dis-charge free available or total residual chlorine at any one time unless the utility can demonstrate to the Re-gional Administrator or State, if the State has NPDES permit issuing au-thority, that the units in a particular location cannot operate at or below this level of chlorination.

(3) At the permitting authority’s dis-cretion, instead of the monitoring spec-ified in 40 CFR 122.11(b) compliance with the limitations for the 126 pri-ority pollutants in paragraph (d)(1) of this section may be determined by en-gineering calculations which dem-onstrate that the regulated pollutants

are not detectable in the final dis-charge by the analytical methods in 40 CFR part 136.

(e) The quantity of pollutants dis-charged in chemical metal cleaning wastes shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of chemical metal cleaning wastes times the concentration listed in the fol-lowing table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day (mg/l)

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

¥(mg/l)

Copper, total .............................. 1.0 1.0 Iron, total ................................... 1.0 1.0

(f) [Reserved—Nonchemical Metal Cleaning Wastes].

(g) At the permitting authority’s dis-cretion, the quantity of pollutant al-lowed to be discharged may be ex-pressed as a concentration limitation instead of the mass based limitations specified in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section. Concentration limita-tions shall be those concentrations specified in this section.

(h) In the event that waste streams from various sources are combined for treatment or discharge, the quantity of each pollutant or pollutant property controlled in paragraphs (a) through (g) of this section attributable to each controlled waste source shall not ex-ceed the specified limitation for that waste source.

(The information collection requirements contained in paragraphs (c)(2) and (d)(2) were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2040–0040. The information collection requirements con-tained in paragraph (d)(3) were approved under control number 2040–0033.)

[47 FR 52304, Nov. 19, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 31404, July 8, 1983]

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00659 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 423 ATTACHMENT F

650

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 423.14

§ 423.14 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

§ 423.15 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Any new source subject to this sub-part must achieve the following new source performance standards:

(a) The pH of all discharges, except once through cooling water, shall be within the range of 6.0–9.0.

(b) There shall be no discharge of pol-ychlorinated biphenyl compounds such as those commonly used for trans-former fluid.

(c) The quantity of pollutants dis-charged from low volume waste sources shall not exceed the quantity deter-mined by multiplying the flow of low volume waste sources times the con-centration listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

NSPS effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day (mg/l)

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

(mg/l)

TSS ............................................ 100.0 30.0 Oil and grease ........................... 20.0 15.0

(d) The quantity of pollutants dis-charged in chemical metal cleaning wastes shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of chemical metal cleaning wastes times the concentration listed in the fol-lowing table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

NSPS effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day (mg/l)

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

(mg/l)

TSS ............................................ 100.0 30.0 Oil and grease ........................... 20.0 15.0 Copper, total .............................. 1.0 1.0 Iron, total ................................... 1.0 1.0

(e) [Reserved—Nonchemical Metal Cleaning Wastes].

(f) The quantity of pollutants dis-charged in bottom ash transport water shall not exceed the quantity deter-mined by multiplying the flow of the

bottom ash transport water times the concentration listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

NSPS effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day (mg/l)

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

(mg/l)

TSS ............................................ 100.0 30.0 Oil and grease ........................... 20.0 15.0

(g) There shall be no discharge of wastewater pollutants from fly ash transport water.

(h)(1) For any plant with a total rated electric generating capacity of 25 or more megawatts, the quantity of pollutants discharged in once through cooling water from each discharge point shall not exceed the quantity de-termined by multiplying the flow of once through cooling water from each discharge point times the concentra-tion listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

NSPS effluent limitations

Maximum concentration (mg/l)

Total residual chlorine ................... 0.20

(2) Total residual chlorine may not be discharged from any single gener-ating unit for more than two hours per day unless the discharger demonstrates to the permitting authority that dis-charge for more than two hours is re-quired for macroinvertebrate control. Simultaneous multi-unit chlorination is permitted.

(i)(1) For any plant with a total rated generating capacity of less than 25 megawatts, the quantity of pollutants discharged in once through cooling water shall not exceed the quantity de-termined by multiplying the flow of once through cooling water sources times the concentration listed in the following table:

Pollutant of pollutant property

NSPS effluent limitations

Maximum concentra-tion (mg/l)

Average concentra-tion (mg/l)

Free available chlorine .............. 0.5 0.2

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00660 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 423 ATTACHMENT F

651

Environmental Protection Agency § 423.16

(2) Neither free available chlorine nor total residual chlorine may be dis-charged from any unit for more than two hours in any one day and not more than one unit in any plant may dis-charge free available or total residual chlorine at any one time unless the utility can demonstrate to the Re-gional Administrator or State, if the State has NPDES permit issuing au-thority, that the units in a particular location cannot operate at or below this level of chlorination.

(j)(1) The quantity of pollutants dis-charged in cooling tower blowdown shall not exceed the quantity deter-mined by multiplying the flow of cool-ing tower blowdown times the con-centration listed below:

Pollutant or pollutant property

NSPS effluent limitations

Maximum concentra-tion (mg/l)

Average concentra-tion (mg/l)

Free available chlorine .............. 0.5 0.2

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day (mg/l)

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

¥(mg/l)

The 126 priority pollutants (Ap-pendix A) contained in chemi-cals added for cooling tower maintenance, except: (1) (1)

Chromium, total .................. 0.2 0.2 Zinc, total ............................ 1.0 1.0

1 No detectable amount.

(2) Neither free available chlorine nor total residual chlorine may be dis-charged from any unit for more than two hours in any one day and not more than one unit in any plant may dis-charge free available or total residual chlorine at any one time unless the utility can demonstrate to the Re-gional Administrator or State, if the State has NPDES permit issuing au-thority, that the units in a particular location cannot operate at or below this level of chlorination.

(3) At the permitting authority’s dis-cretion, instead of the monitoring in 40 CFR 122.11(b), compliance with the lim-itations for the 126 priority pollutants in paragraph (j)(1) of this section may be determined by engineering calcula-tions which demonstrate that the regu-lated pollutants are not detectable in

the final discharge by the analytical methods in 40 CFR part 136.

(k) Subject to the provisions of § 423.15(l), the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant parameters dis-charged in coal pile runoff shall not ex-ceed the limitations specified below:

Pollutant or pollutant property NSPS effluent limi-tations for any time

TSS ........................................................ Not to exceed 50 mg/l.

(l) Any untreated overflow from fa-cilities designed, constructed, and op-erated to treat the coal pile runoff which results from a 10 year, 24 hour rainfall event shall not be subject to the limitations in § 423.15(k).

(m) At the permitting authority’s discretion, the quantity of pollutant allowed to be discharged may be ex-pressed as a concentration limitation instead of the mass based limitation specified in paragraphs (c) through (j) of this section. Concentration limits shall be based on the concentrations specified in this section.

(n) In the event that waste streams from various sources are combined for treatment or discharge, the quantity of each pollutant or pollutant property controlled in paragraphs (a) through (m) of this section attributable to each controlled waste source shall not ex-ceed the specified limitation for that waste source.

(The information collection requirements contained in paragraphs (h)(2), (i)(2), and (j)(2) were approved by the Office of Manage-ment and Budget under control number 2040– 0040. The information collection require-ments contained in paragraph (j)(3) were ap-proved under control number 2040–0033.)

[47 FR 52304, Nov. 19, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 31404, July 8, 1983]

§ 423.16 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 and 403.13, any existing source subject to this subpart which introduces pol-lutants into a publicly owned treat-ment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES) by July 1, 1984:

(a) There shall be no discharge of pol-ychlorinated biphenol compounds such as those used for transformer fluid.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00661 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 423 ATTACHMENT F

652

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 423.17

(b) The pollutants discharged in chemical metal cleaning wastes shall not exceed the concentration listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

PSES pretreatment standards

Maximum for 1 day (mg/ l)

Copper, total .................................. 1.0

(c) [Reserved—Nonchemical Metal Cleaning Wastes].

(d)(1) The pollutants discharged in cooling tower blowdown shall not ex-ceed the concentration listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

PSES pretreatment standards

Maximum for any time (mg/l)

The 126 priority pollutants (Appen-dix A) contained in chemicals added for cooling tower mainte-nance, except: (1)

Chromium, total ...................... 0.2 Zinc, total ................................ 1.0

1 No detectable amount.

(2) At the permitting authority’s dis-cretion, instead of the monitoring in 40 CFR 122.11(b), compliance with the lim-itations for the 126 priority pollutants in paragraph (d)(1) of this section may be determined by engineering calcula-tions which demonstrate that the regu-lated pollutants are not detectable in the final discharge by the analytical methods in 40 CFR part 136.

§ 423.17 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7, any new source subject to this subpart part which introduces pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and the following pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

(a) There shall be no discharge of pol-ychlorinated biphenyl compounds such as those used for transformer fluid.

(b) The pollutants discharged in chemical metal cleaning wastes shall not exceed the concentration listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

PSNS pretreatment standards

Maximum for 1 day (mg/ l)

Copper, total .................................. 1.0

(c) [Reserved—Nonchemical Metal Cleaning Wastes].

(d)(1) The pollutants discharged in cooling tower blowdown shall not ex-ceed the concentration listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

PSNS pretreatment standards

Maximum for any time (mg/l)

The 126 priority pollutants (Appen-dix A) contained in chemicals added for cooling tower mainte-nance, except:

Chromium, total ...................... 0.2 Zinc, total ................................ 1.0

(2) At the permitting authority’s dis-cretion, instead of the monitoring in 40 CFR 122.11(b), compliance with the lim-itations for the 126 priority pollutants in paragraph (d)(1) of this section may be determined by engineering calcula-tions which demonstrate that the regu-lated pollutants are not detectable in the final discharge by the analytical methods in 40 CFR part 136.

(e) There shall be no discharge of wastewater pollutants from fly ash transport water.

APPENDIX A TO PART 423—126 PRIORITY POLLUTANTS

001 Acenaphthene 002 Acrolein 003 Acrylonitrile 004 Benzene 005 Benzidine 006 Carbon tetrachloride

(tetrachloromethane) 007 Chlorobenzene 008 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 009 Hexachlorobenzene 010 1,2-dichloroethane 011 1,1,1-trichloreothane 012 Hexachloroethane 013 1,1-dichloroethane 014 1,1,2-trichloroethane 015 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 016 Chloroethane 018 Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 019 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether (mixed) 020 2-chloronaphthalene 021 2,4, 6-trichlorophenol 022 Parachlorometa cresol 023 Chloroform (trichloromethane)

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00662 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 423 ATTACHMENT F

653

Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 424

024 2-chlorophenol 025 1,2-dichlorobenzene 026 1,3-dichlorobenzene 027 1,4-dichlorobenzene 028 3,3-dichlorobenzidine 029 1,1-dichloroethylene 030 1,2-trans-dichloroethylene 031 2,4-dichlorophenol 032 1,2-dichloropropane 033 1,2-dichloropropylene (1,3-

dichloropropene) 034 2,4-dimethylphenol 035 2,4-dinitrotoluene 036 2,6-dinitrotoluene 037 1,2-diphenylhydrazine 038 Ethylbenzene 039 Fluoranthene 040 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether 041 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether 042 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether 043 Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane 044 Methylene chloride (dichloromethane) 045 Methyl chloride (dichloromethane) 046 Methyl bromide (bromomethane) 047 Bromoform (tribromomethane) 048 Dichlorobromomethane 051 Chlorodibromomethane 052 Hexachlorobutadiene 053 Hexachloromyclopentadiene 054 Isophorone 055 Naphthalene 056 Nitrobenzene 057 2-nitrophenol 058 4-nitrophenol 059 2,4-dinitrophenol 060 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol 061 N-nitrosodimethylamine 062 N-nitrosodiphenylamine 063 N-nitrosodi-n-propylamin 064 Pentachlorophenol 065 Phenol 066 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 067 Butyl benzyl phthalate 068 Di-N-Butyl Phthalate 069 Di-n-octyl phthalate 070 Diethyl Phthalate 071 Dimethyl phthalate 072 1,2-benzanthracene (benzo(a) anthracene 073 Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-benzo-pyrene) 074 3,4-Benzofluoranthene (benzo(b) fluoran-

thene) 075 11,12-benzofluoranthene (benzo(b) fluo-

ranthene) 076 Chrysene 077 Acenaphthylene 078 Anthracene 079 1,12-benzoperylene (benzo(ghi) perylene) 080 Fluorene 081 Phenanthrene 082 1,2,5,6-dibenzanthracene (dibenzo(,h) an-

thracene) 083 Indeno (,1,2,3-cd) pyrene (2,3-o-

pheynylene pyrene) 084 Pyrene 085 Tetrachloroethylene 086 Toluene 087 Trichloroethylene

088 Vinyl chloride (chloroethylene) 089 Aldrin 090 Dieldrin 091 Chlordane (technical mixture and me-

tabolites) 092 4,4-DDT 093 4,4-DDE (p,p-DDX) 094 4,4-DDD (p,p-TDE) 095 Alpha-endosulfan 096 Beta-endosulfan 097 Endosulfan sulfate 098 Endrin 099 Endrin aldehyde 100 Heptachlor 101 Heptachlor epoxide (BHC-

hexachlorocyclohexane) 102 Alpha-BHC 103 Beta-BHC 104 Gamma-BHC (lindane) 105 Delta-BHC (PCB-polychlorinated

biphenyls) 106 PCB–1242 (Arochlor 1242) 107 PCB–1254 (Arochlor 1254) 108 PCB–1221 (Arochlor 1221) 109 PCB–1232 (Arochlor 1232) 110 PCB–1248 (Arochlor 1248) 111 PCB–1260 (Arochlor 1260) 112 PCB–1016 (Arochlor 1016) 113 Toxaphene 114 Antimony 115 Arsenic 116 Asbestos 117 Beryllium 118 Cadmium 119 Chromium 120 Copper 121 Cyanide, Total 122 Lead 123 Mercury 124 Nickel 125 Selenium 126 Silver 127 Thallium 126 Silver 128 Zinc 129 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin

(TCDD)

PART 424—FERROALLOY MANU-FACTURING POINT SOURCE CAT-EGORY

Subpart A—Open Electric Furnaces With Wet Air Pollution Control Devices Sub-category

Sec. 424.10 Applicability; description of the open

electric furnaces with wet air pollution control devices subcategory.

424.11 Specialized definitions. 424.12 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00663 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 423 ATTACHMENT F

445

Environmental Protection Agency § 443.15

Subpart A—Asphalt Emulsion Subcategory

§ 443.10 Applicability; description of the asphalt emulsion subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the production of asphalt paving and roofing emulsions.

§ 443.11 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term ‘‘production area size’’ shall mean that area in which the oxi-dation towers, loading facilities, and all buildings that house product proc-esses are located.

(c) The term ‘‘process wastewater pollutants’’ shall mean any pollutants present in the process wastewaters and rainwater runoff.

§ 443.12 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Metric units (kg/cu m of runoff)

Oil and grease ..................... 0.020 0.015 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

English units (lb/1,000 gal of runoff)

Oil and grease ..................... 0.167 0.125 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

[40 FR 31191, July 24, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33969, June 29, 1995]

§ 443.13 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Metric units (kg/cu m of runoff)

TSS ...................................... 0.023 0.015 Oil and grease ..................... 0.015 0.010 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

English units (lb/1,000 gal of runoff)

TSS ...................................... 0.188 0.125 Oil and grease ..................... 0.125 0.083 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 443.14 [Reserved]

§ 443.15 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Metric units (kg/cu m of runoff)

TSS ...................................... 0.023 0.015 Oil and grease ..................... 0.015 0.010 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

English units (lb/1,000 gal of runoff)

TSS ...................................... 0.188 0.125 Oil and grease ..................... 0.125 0.083 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00455 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 443 ATTACHMENT F

446

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 443.16

§ 443.16 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

Any new source subject to this sub-part that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403. In addition, the following pretreatment standard establishes the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this section which may be discharged to a publicly owned treatment works by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard

BOD5 ............................................... No limitation. TSS ................................................. Do. pH ................................................... Do. Oil and grease ................................ 100 mg/l.

[40 FR 31191, July 24, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33969, June 29, 1995]

Subpart B—Asphalt Concrete Subcategory

§ 443.20 Applicability; description of the asphalt concrete subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the production of asphalt concrete.

§ 443.21 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term ‘‘process wastewater’’ shall mean any water which, during the manufacturing process, comes into direct contact with any raw material, intermediate product, by-product, or product used in or resulting from the production of paving asphalt concrete.

(c) The term ‘‘process wastewater pollutants’’ shall mean any pollutants present in the process wastewater.

§ 443.22 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall

achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT): There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

[60 FR 33969, June 29, 1995]

§ 443.23 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties which may be dis-charged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable: There shall be no discharge of process waste-water pollutants to navigable waters.

§ 443.24 [Reserved]

§ 443.25 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart: There shall be no discharge of process wastewater pollutants to navi-gable waters.

§ 443.26 Pretreatment standard for new sources.

Any new source subject to this sub-part that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403. In addition, the following pretreatment standard establishes the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this section which may be discharged to a publicly owned treatment works by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard

BOD5 ............................................... No limitation. TSS ................................................. Do. pH ................................................... Do. Oil and grease ................................ 100 mg/l.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00456 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 443 ATTACHMENT F

447

Environmental Protection Agency § 443.35

[40 FR 31191, July 24, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33969, June 29, 1995]

Subpart C—Asphalt Roofing Subcategory

§ 443.30 Applicability; description of the asphalt roofing subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the production of asphalt roofing mate-rials.

§ 443.31 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term ‘‘process wastewater’’ shall mean any water which, during the manufacturing process, comes into direct contact with any raw material, intermediate product, by-product, or product used in or resulting from the production of asphalt roofing mate-rials.

(c) The term ‘‘process wastewater pollutants’’ shall mean any pollutants present in the process wastewater.

§ 443.32 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Metric units (kg/kkg of product)

TSS ...................................... 0.056 0.038 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

English units (lb/1,000 lb of product)

TSS ...................................... 0.056 0.038 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

[40 FR 31191, July 24, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33969, June 29, 1995]

§ 443.33 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Metric units (kg/kkg of product)

TSS ...................................... 0.028 0.019 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

English units (lb/1,000 lb of product)

TSS ...................................... 0.028 0.019 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 443.34 [Reserved]

§ 443.35 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00457 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 443 ATTACHMENT F

448

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 443.36

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Metric units (kg/kkg of product)

TSS ...................................... 0.028 0.019 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

English units (lb/1,000 lb of product)

TSS ...................................... 0.028 0.019 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 443.36 Pretreatment standard for new sources.

Any new source subject to this sub-part that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403. In addition, the following pretreatment standard establishes the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this section which may be discharged to a publicly owned treatment works by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard

BOD5 ............................................... No limitation. TSS ................................................. Do. pH ................................................... Do. Oil and grease ................................ 100 mg/l.

[40 FR 31191, July 24, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33969, June 29, 1995]

Subpart D—Linoleum and Printed Asphalt Felt Subcategory

§ 443.40 Applicability; description of the linoleum and printed asphalt felt subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the production of Linoleum and Print-ed Asphalt Felt floor coverings.

§ 443.41 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term ‘‘process wastewater’’ shall mean any water which, during the manufacturing process, comes into direct contact with any raw material, intermediate product, by-product, or product used in or resulting from the production of linoleum and printed as-phalt felt floor coverings.

(c) The term ‘‘process wastewater pollutants’’ shall mean any pollutants present in the process wastewater.

§ 443.42 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Metric units (kg/kkg of product)

TSS ...................................... 0.038 0.025 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

English units (lb/1,000 lb of product)

TSS ...................................... 0.038 0.025 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

[40 FR 31191, July 24, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33970, June 29, 1995]

§ 443.43 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00458 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 443 ATTACHMENT F

449

Environmental Protection Agency § 444.10

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Metric units (kg/kkg of product)

TSS ...................................... 0.019 0.013 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

English units (lb/1,000 lb of product)

TSS ...................................... 0.019 0.013 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 443.44 [Reserved]

§ 443.45 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Metric units (kg/kkg of product)

pH ........................................ (1) (1)

English units (lb/1,000 lb of product)

TSS ...................................... 0.019 0.013 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 443.46 Pretreatment standard for new sources.

Any new source subject to this sub-part that introduces process waste-water pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403. In addition, the following pretreatment standard establishes the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this section which may be discharged to a publicly owned treatment works by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard

BOD5 ............................................... No limitation. TSS ................................................. Do. pH ................................................... Do. Oil and grease ................................ 100 mg/l.

[40 FR 31191, July 24, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 33970, June 29, 1995]

PART 444—WASTE COMBUSTORS POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

Subpart A—Commercial Hazardous Waste Combustor Subcategory

Sec. 444.10 Applicability. 444.11 Definitions. 444.12 Monitoring requirements. 444.13 Effluent limitations attainable by the

application of the best practical control technology currently available (BPT).

444.14 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best conventional pol-lutant control technology (BCT).

444.15 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

444.16 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

444.17 New source performance standards (NSPS).

444.18 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304, 306, 307, 308, 402, and 501 of the Clean Water Act, as amended; 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1314, 1316, 1317, 1318, 1342, and 1361.

SOURCE: 65 FR 4381, Jan. 27, 2000, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart A—Commercial Haz-ardous Waste Combustor Sub-category

§ 444.10 Applicability.

(a) The provisions of this part apply only to that portion of wastewater dis-charges that are associated with Com-mercial Hazardous Waste Combustor (CHWC) wastewater.

(b) The discharge from a CHWC of wastewater that is not CHWC waste-water, may be subject to other applica-ble provisions of EPA’s CWA effluent guidelines and standards regulations at Subchapter N of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00459 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 443 ATTACHMENT F

470

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–12 Edition) § 447.12

methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

§ 447.12 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT): There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

[60 FR 33970, June 29, 1995]

§ 447.13 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties which may be dis-charged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable: There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

§ 447.14 [Reserved]

§ 447.15 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties

which may be discharged by a new

source subject to the provisions of this

subpart: There shall be no discharge of

process waste water pollutants to navi-

gable waters.

§ 447.16 Pretreatment standards for new sources.

Any new source subject to this sub-

part that introduces process waste-

water pollutants into a publicly owned

treatment works must comply with 40

CFR part 403. In addition, the following

pretreatment standard establishes the

quantity or quality of pollutants or

pollutant properties controlled by this

section which may be discharged to a

publicly owned treatment works by a

new source subject to the provisions of

this subpart: There shall be no dis-

charge of process water pollutants to a

publicly owned treatment works.

[60 FR 33970, June 29, 1995]

PART 449—AIRPORT DEICING POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

Subpart A—Airport Deicing Category

Sec.

449.1 Applicability.

449.2 General definitions.

449.10 Effluent limitations representing the

best available technology economically

achievable (BAT).

449.11 New source performance standards

(NSPS).

449.20 Monitoring, reporting and record-

keeping requirements.

Subpart B [Reserved]

APPENDIX A TO PART 449—SAMPLING PRO-

TOCOL FOR SOLUBLE COD

AUTHORITY: 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1314, 1316, 1318,

1342, 1361 and 1370.

SOURCE: 77 FR 29203, May 16, 2012, unless

otherwise noted.

Subpart A—Airport Deicing Category

§ 449.1 Applicability. This part applies to discharges of pol-

lutants from deicing operations at Pri-

mary Airports.

§ 449.2 General definitions. The following definitions apply to

this part:

Aircraft deicing fluid (ADF) means a

fluid (other than hot water) applied to

aircraft to remove or prevent any accu-

mulation of snow or ice on the aircraft.

This includes deicing and anti-icing

fluids.

Airfield pavement means all paved sur-

faces on the airside of an airport.

Airside means the part of an airport

directly involved in the arrival and de-

parture of aircraft, including runways,

taxiways, aprons, and ramps.

Annual non-propeller aircraft depar-tures means the average number of

commercial turbine-engine aircraft

that are propelled by jet, i.e., turbojet

VerDate Mar<15>2010 09:46 Aug 24, 2012 Jkt 226176 PO 00000 Frm 00480 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\226176.XXX 226176pman

grum

on

DS

K3V

PT

VN

1PR

OD

with

CF

R

CATEGORY 449 ATTACHMENT F

471

Environmental Protection Agency § 449.11

or turbofan, that take off from an air-

port on an annual basis, as tabulated

by the Federal Aviation Administra-

tion (FAA). Available ADF means 75 percent of

the normalized Type I aircraft deicing

fluid and 10 percent of the normalized

Type IV aircraft deicing fluid, exclud-

ing aircraft deicing fluids used for

defrosting or deicing for safe taxiing. Centralized deicing pad means a facil-

ity on an airfield designed for aircraft

deicing operations, typically con-

structed with a drainage system sepa-

rate from the airport main storm drain

system. COD means Chemical Oxygen De-

mand. Collection requirement means the re-

quirement in § 449.11 for the permittee

to collect available ADF. Defrosting means the removal of frost

contamination from an aircraft when

there has been no active precipitation. Deicing mean procedures and prac-

tices to remove or prevent any accu-

mulation of snow or ice on: (1) An aircraft; or (2) Airfield pavement. Deicing for safe taxiing means the ap-

plication of ADF necessary to remove

snow or ice to prevent damage to a tax-

iing aircraft. FAA Advisory Circular means a guid-

ance document issued by the FAA on

methods, procedures, or facility design.

Heating degree day means the number

of degrees per day the daily average

temperature is below 65 degrees Fahr-

enheit. The daily average temperature

is the mean of the maximum and min-

imum temperature for a 24-hour period.

The annual heating degree day value is

derived by summing the daily heating

degree days over a calendar year pe-

riod.

Normalized Type I or Type IV aircraft deicing fluid means ADF less any water

added by the manufacturer or customer

before ADF application.

Primary Airport means an airport de-

fined at 49 U.S.C. 47102 (15).

§ 449.10 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30

through 125.32, any existing point

source with at least 1,000 annual non-

propeller aircraft departures must

comply with the following require-

ments representing the degree of efflu-

ent reduction attainable by the appli-

cation of BAT. The BAT requirements

for point sources with less than 1,000

annual non-propeller aircraft depar-

tures are beyond the scope of this regu-

lation and shall be determined by the

permit authority on a site-specific

basis.

(a) Airfield pavement deicing. There

shall be no discharge of airfield pave-

ment deicers containing urea. To com-

ply with this limitation, any existing

point source must certify annually

that it does not use airfield deicing

products that contain urea or alter-

natively, airfield pavement discharges

at every discharge point must achieve

the numeric limitations for ammonia

in Table I, prior to any dilution or

commingling with any non-deicing dis-

charge.

TABLE I—BAT LIMITATIONS

Wastestream Pollutant Daily maximum

Airfield Pavement Deicing ....................................... Ammonia as Nitrogen ............................................. 14.7 mg/L.

(b) [Reserved]

§ 449.11 New source performance standards (NSPS).

New sources with at least 1,000 an-

nual non-propeller aircraft departures

must achieve the following new source

performance standards. The new source

performance standards for point

sources with less than 1,000 annual non-

propeller aircraft departures are be-

yond the scope of this part and shall be

determined by the permit authority on

a site-specific basis.

(a) Aircraft deicing. Except for new

airports located in Alaska, all new

sources located in an area that, at the

time of construction, had more than

3,000 annual heating degree days, and

are estimated, within five years of

VerDate Mar<15>2010 09:46 Aug 24, 2012 Jkt 226176 PO 00000 Frm 00481 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\226176.XXX 226176pman

grum

on

DS

K3V

PT

VN

1PR

OD

with

CF

R

CATEGORY 449 ATTACHMENT F

472

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–12 Edition) § 449.20

commencing operations, to exceed 10,000 annual departures, must comply with the following requirements upon the date the facility exceeds 10,000 an-nual departures. New source perform-ance standards that apply prior to that

date, new source performance stand-

ards for sources that project they will

not exceed 10,000 annual departures

within five years of commencing oper-

ations, and new performance standards

for airports in Alaska, are beyond the

scope of this regulation and shall be de-

termined by the permit authority on a

site-specific basis.

(1) Collection requirement. The new

source must collect at least 60 percent

of available ADF.

(2) Numerical effluent limitation. The

new source must achieve the perform-

ance standards in Table II for available

ADF collected pursuant to paragraph

(a)(1) of this section. The limitation

must be met at the location where the

effluent leaves the onsite treatment

system utilized for meeting these re-

quirements and before commingling

with any non-deicing discharge.

TABLE II—NSPS

Wastestream Pollutant Daily maximum Weekly average

Aircraft Deicing ..................................... COD .................................................... 271 mg/L ................... 154 mg/L.

(b) Airfield pavement deicing. There

shall be no discharge of airfield pave-

ment deicers containing urea. To com-

ply with this limitation, any new

source must certify annually that it

does not use airfield deicing products

that contain urea or alternatively, air-

field pavement discharges at every dis-

charge point must achieve the numeric

limitations for ammonia in Table III,

prior to any dilution or commingling

with any non-deicing discharge.

TABLE III—NSPS

Wastestream Pollutant Daily maximum

Airfield Pavement Deicing ....................................... Ammonia as Nitrogen ............................................. 14.7 mg/L.

§ 449.20 Monitoring, reporting and rec-ordkeeping requirements.

(a) Demonstrating compliance with the

ADF collection requirement for dis-

chargers subject to NSPS collection re-

quirements in § 449.11. Except as pro-

vided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32,

an individual permittee shall select a

procedure under either paragraphs

(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this section in its

permit application as the procedure for

the permittee to demonstrate compli-

ance with the applicable collection, re-

porting and recordkeeping require-

ments of this Part. A procedure se-

lected by the permittee under para-

graph (a)(2) of this section may be in-

cluded in the permit only with the Di-

rector’s approval, as described in para-

graph (a)(2) of this section. For general

permits, use of alternative methods for

determining compliance with the ADF

collection requirement for dischargers

subject to NSPS collection require-

ments in this part will be at the discre-

tion of the Director.

(1) The permittee shall maintain

records to demonstrate, and certify an-

nually, that it is operating and main-

taining one or more centralized deicing

pads. This technology shall be operated

and maintained according to the tech-

nical specifications set forth in para-

graphs (a)(1)(i) through (iv) of this sec-

tion. For both individual and general

permits, these technical specifications

shall be expressly set forth as require-

ments in the permit. The permittee’s

demonstration and valid certification

are sufficient to meet the applicable

NSPS collection requirement without

the permittee having to determine the

numeric percentage of available ADF

collected.

(i) Each centralized deicing pad shall

be sized and sited in accordance with

all applicable FAA advisory circulars.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 09:46 Aug 24, 2012 Jkt 226176 PO 00000 Frm 00482 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\226176.XXX 226176pman

grum

on

DS

K3V

PT

VN

1PR

OD

with

CF

R

CATEGORY 449 ATTACHMENT F

473

Environmental Protection Agency § 449.20

(ii) Drainage valves associated with

the centralized deicing pad shall be ac-

tivated before deicing activities com-

mence, to collect available ADF.

(iii) The centralized deicing pad and

associated collection equipment shall

be installed and maintained per any ap-

plicable manufacturers’ instructions,

and shall be inspected, at a minimum,

at the beginning of each deicing season

to ensure that the pad and associated

equipment are in working condition.

(iv) All aircraft deicing shall take

place on a centralized deicing pad, with

the exception of defrosting and deicing

for safe taxiing.

(2) Alternative technology or specifica-tions. (i) An individual permit (or a

general permit at the discretion of the

Director) may allow one of the fol-

lowing alternative procedures for dem-

onstrating compliance with its collec-

tion requirement, instead of the proce-

dure in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.

The permittee must submit all infor-

mation and documentation necessary

to support this request. An individual

permittee may request this alternative

procedure in its initial permit applica-

tion or permit renewal application.

During the term of an individual per-

mit, the permittee may also request

this alternative procedure as a permit

modification, subject to the require-

ments and procedures at 40 CFR 122.62

and 40 CFR part 124. If the Director de-

termines, in his or her discretion, that

the requested alternative procedure

will achieve the collection requirement

in the permit, the Director shall ap-

prove the request:

(A) The use of a different ADF collec-

tion technology from the centralized

deicing pad technology specified in

paragraph (a)(1) of this section; or

(B) The use of the same ADF collec-

tion technology, but with different

specifications for operation and/or

maintenance.

(ii) Pollution prevention credit. A per-

mittee may apply for, and obtain, full

or partial credit towards compliance

with the available ADF collection re-

quirement. To obtain credit the per-

mittee must demonstrate to the Direc-

tor’s satisfaction that it employs a pol-

lution prevention technique that re-

duces the volume of, or quantity of,

pollutants in, available ADF. The cred-

it shall be equivalent to the dem-

onstrated reduction, as determined by

the Director.

(iii) The Director shall set forth tech-

nical specifications for proper oper-

ation and maintenance of the chosen

collection technology, as appropriate,

and compliance with these technical

specifications must be required by the

permit. The permit shall also require

the permittee to maintain records suf-

ficient to demonstrate compliance with

these requirements. This demonstra-

tion constitutes compliance by the per-

mittee with the percent capture re-

quirement without the permittee hav-

ing to determine the numeric percent-

age of ADF that it has collected. Be-

fore the Director may approve an alter-

nate technology under this subsection,

the permittee must demonstrate to the

Director’s satisfaction that the alter-

nate technology will achieve the appli-

cable percent capture requirement.

(3) The permittee shall maintain

records, by means deemed acceptable

by the Director, and report at a fre-

quency determined by the Director, on

the volume of ADF sprayed and the

amount of available ADF collected in

order to determine the compliance

with the collection requirement.

(b) Monitoring requirements—(1) COD

limitation. Permittees subject to the

ADF collection and discharge require-

ments specified in § 449.11 must conduct

effluent monitoring to demonstrate

compliance with the COD limitation

for all ADF that is collected. Compli-

ance must be demonstrated at the loca-

tion where the effluent leaves the on-

site treatment system utilized for

meeting these requirements and before

commingling with any non-deicing dis-

charge. Effluent samples must be col-

lected following the protocol in Appen-

dix A to this part.

(2) Ammonia limitation. If a permittee

chooses to comply with the compliance

alternative specified in § 449.10(a) or

§ 449.11(b), the permittee must conduct

effluent monitoring at all locations

where pavement deicing with a product

that contains urea is occurring, prior

to any dilution or commingling with

any non-deicing discharge.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 09:46 Aug 24, 2012 Jkt 226176 PO 00000 Frm 00483 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\226176.XXX 226176pman

grum

on

DS

K3V

PT

VN

1PR

OD

with

CF

R

CATEGORY 449 ATTACHMENT F

474

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–12 Edition) Pt. 449, App. A

(c) Recordkeeping. (1) The permit shall provide that the permittee must main-tain on site, during the term of the per-mit, up to five years, records docu-menting compliance with paragraphs (a) through (b) of this section. These records include, but are not limited to, documentation of wastewater samples collected and analyzed, certifications,

and equipment maintenance schedules

and agreements. (2) At the Director’s discretion, a re-

quirement may be included in the per-

mit for the permittee to collect, and

maintain on site during the term of the

permit, up to five (5) years of data on

the annual volume of ADF used.

Subpart B [Reserved]

APPENDIX A TO PART 449—SAMPLING

PROTOCOL FOR SOLUBLE COD

This sampling protocol applies only to

samples collected for use in measurement of

COD when demonstrating compliance with

the regulations set forth in this part. Collect

a representative sample of the effluent from

the airport deicing treatment system, based

on the discharge permit requirements (e.g., a

grab sample or a composite sample). Because

only the COD sample is filtered, do not use

in-line filters if collecting a sample with a

compositing device.

A. GRAB SAMPLES

1. Cap the container and shake the grab

sample vigorously to mix it. Remove the

plunger from a 10-milliliter (mL) or larger

Luer-lock plastic syringe equipped with an

Acrodisc Luer-lock filter containing a 1.5-μm

glass fiber filter (Whatman 934–AH, or equiv-

alent), and fill the syringe body with sample. 2. Replace the plunger and filter the sam-

ple into a clean 50-mL screw-cap glass, plas-

tic, or fluoropolymer bottle. Note: If testing is being done in the field,

or with a test kit product (e.g., Hach Method

8000), the filtrate may be collected in the

test kit vial or container. 3. Additional 10-mL volumes of sample may

be filtered and the filtrate added to the same

sample bottle. This additional volume may

be used to repeat sample analyses or to pre-

pare Quality Control (QC) samples, as need-

ed. 4. Unless the filtered sample will be ana-

lyzed within 15 minutes, preserve the filtered

sample with H2SO4 to pH <2. Cap the bottle

and label with the sample number. Place in

a cooler on ice prior to shipping. 5. Once at the analytical laboratory, the

sample must be stored at ≤6 degrees Celsius

and analyzed within 28 days of collection (see

the requirements for COD in Table II at 40

CFR part 136).

6. Analyze the sample using a method ap-

proved for COD in Table IB at 40 CFR part

136.

Note: Because this procedure is specific to

this point source category, it does not ap-

pear by name in 40 CFR part 136.

7. Report the sample results as Soluble

COD in units of milligrams per liter (mg/L).

There is no Chemical Abstracts Service

(CAS) Registry Number for soluble COD.

B. COMPOSITE SAMPLES

1. If the sample will be analyzed in a fixed

laboratory (as opposed to field testing),

transfer at least 50 mL of well-mixed sample

from the compositing device into a clean 50-

mL screw-cap glass, plastic, or

fluoropolymer bottle. Preserve the sample

with H2SO4 to pH <2. Cap the bottle and label

with the sample number. Place in a cooler on

ice prior to shipping.

2. Once at the analytical laboratory, the

sample must be stored at ≤6 degrees Celsius

and analyzed within 28 days of collection (see

the requirements for COD in Table II at 40

CFR part 136).

3. Prior to analysis, remove the sample

from cold storage and allow it to warm to

room temperature. Shake the sample vigor-

ously to mix it.

4. Remove the plunger from a 10-mL or

larger Luer-lock plastic syringe equipped

with an Acrodisc Luer-lock filter containing

a 1.5-μm glass fiber filter (Whatman 934–AH,

or equivalent), and fill the syringe body with

sample.

5. Replace the plunger and filter the sam-

ple into a clean COD vial or other suitable

container.

6. Additional 10-mL volumes of sample may

be filtered and the filtrate added to separate

containers, as needed, to provide samples for

repeat analyses or to prepare QC samples.

7. Analyze the sample using a method ap-

proved for COD in Table 1B at 40 CFR part

136.

Note: Because this procedure is specific to

this point source category, it does not ap-

pear by name in 40 CFR part 136.

8. Report the sample results as Soluble

COD in units of mg/L. There is no CAS Reg-

istry Number for soluble COD.

PART 450—CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

Subpart A—General Provisions

Sec.

450.10 Applicability.

450.11 General definitions.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 09:46 Aug 24, 2012 Jkt 226176 PO 00000 Frm 00484 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\226176.XXX 226176pman

grum

on

DS

K3V

PT

VN

1PR

OD

with

CF

R

CATEGORY 449 ATTACHMENT F

636

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 421.337

PSNS FOR THE PRIMARY ZIRCONIUM AND HAFNIUM SUBCATEGORY

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Maximum for monthly

average

mg/kg (pounds per million pounds) of zirconium contained in alloys pro-duced

Chromium (total) ........................ 0.292 0.118 Cyanide (total) ........................... 0.158 0.063 Lead ........................................... 0.221 0.103 Nickel ......................................... 0.434 0.292 Ammonia (as N) ........................ 105.200 46.240

§ 421.337 [Reserved]

PART 422—PHOSPHATE MANUFAC-TURING POINT SOURCE CAT-EGORY

Subpart A—Phosphorus Production Subcategory

Sec. 422.10 Applicability; description of the phos-

phorus production subcategory.

Subpart B—Phosphorus Consuming Subcategory

422.20 Applicability; description of the phos-phorus consuming subcategory.

Subpart C—Phosphate Subcategory

422.30 Applicability; description of the phos-phate subcategory.

Subpart D—Defluorinated Phosphate Rock Subcategory

422.40 Applicability; description of the defluorinated phosphate rock sub-category.

422.41 Specialized definitions. 422.42 Effluent limitations and guidelines

representing the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology cur-rently available.

422.43 Effluent limitations and guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

422.44 [Reserved] 422.45 Standards of performance for new

sources. 422.46 [Reserved] 422.47 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology.

Subpart E—Defluorinated Phosphoric Acid Subcategory

422.50 Applicability; description of the defluorinated phosphoric acid sub-category.

422.51 Specialized definitions. 422.52 Effluent limitations and guidelines

representing the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology cur-rently available.

422.53 Effluent limitations and guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

422.54 [Reserved] 422.55 Standards of performance for new

sources. 422.56 [Reserved] 422.57 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology.

Subpart F—Sodium Phosphates Subcategory

422.60 Applicability; description of the so-dium phosphates subcategory.

422.61 Specialized definitions. 422.62 Effluent limitations and guidelines

representing the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology cur-rently available.

422.63 Effluent limitations and guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

422.64 [Reserved] 422.65 Standards of performance for new

sources. 422.66 [Reserved] 422.67 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology.

AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b) and (c), 306 (b) and (c), and 307(c) of the Federal Water Pol-lution Control Act, as amended; 33 U.S.C. 1251, 1311, 1314 (b) and (c), 1316 (b) and (c), 1317(c); 86 Stat. 816 et seq., Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567, Pub. L. 95–217.

SOURCE: 39 FR 6582, Feb. 20, 1974, unless otherwise noted.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00646 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 422 ATTACHMENT F

637

Environmental Protection Agency § 422.41

Subpart A—Phosphorus Production Subcategory

§ 422.10 Applicability; description of the phosphorus production sub-category.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges of pollutants re-sulting from the production of phos-phorus and ferrophosphorus by smelt-ing of phosphate ore.

Subpart B—Phosphorus Consuming Subcategory

§ 422.20 Applicability; description of the phosphorus consuming sub-category.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges of pollutants re-sulting from the manufacture of phos-phoric acid, phosphorus pentoxide, phosphorus pentasulfide, phosphorus trichloride, and phosphorus oxychloride directly from elemental phosphorus. The production of phos-phorus trichloride and phosphorus oxychloride creates waste water pollut-ants not completely amenable to the procedures utilized for best practicable control technology currently available. The standards set for phosphorus tri-chloride manufacture and phosphorus oxychloride manufacture, accordingly, must differ from the rest of the sub-category at this level of treatment.

Subpart C—Phosphate Subcategory

§ 422.30 Applicability; description of the phosphate subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges of pollutants re-sulting from the manufacture of so-dium tripolyphosphate, animal feed grade, calcium phosphate and human food grade calcium phosphate from phosphoric acid. The production of human food grade calcium phosphate creates waste water pollutants not completely amenable to the procedures utilized for best practicable control technology currently available. The standards set for human food grade cal-cium phosphates accordingly must dif-fer from the rest of the subcategory at this level of treatment.

Subpart D—Defluorinated Phosphate Rock Subcategory

SOURCE: 41 FR 25975, June 23, 1976, unless otherwise noted.

§ 422.40 Applicability; description of the defluorinated phosphate rock subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the defluorination of phosphate rock by application of high temperature treatment along with wet process phos-phoric acid, silica and other reagents.

§ 422.41 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations, and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term process waste water means any water which, during manu-facturing or processing, comes into di-rect contact with or results from the production or use of any raw material, intermediate product, finished product, by-product, or waste product. The term ‘‘process waste water’’ does not include contaminated nonprocess waste water, as defined below.

(c) The term contaminated non-process waste water shall mean any water in-cluding precipitation runoff, which during manufacturing or processing, comes into incidental contact with any raw material, intermediate product, finished product, by-product or waste product by means of: (1) Precipitation runoff, (2) accidental spills, (3) acci-dental leaks caused by the failure of process equipment and which are re-paired or the discharge of pollutants therefrom contained or terminated within the shortest reasonable time which shall not exceed 24 hours after discovery or when discovery should reasonably have been made, whichever is earliest, and (4) discharges from safe-ty showers and related personal safety equipment, and from equipment washings for the purpose of safe entry, inspection and maintenance; Provided, That all reasonable measures have been taken to prevent, reduce, elimi-nate and control to the maximum ex-tent feasible such contact and provided further that all reasonable measures

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00647 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 422 ATTACHMENT F

638

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 422.42

have been taken that will mitigate the effects of such contact once it has oc-curred.

(d) The term ten-year 24-hour rainfall event shall mean the maximum precipi-tation event with a probable recur-rence interval of once in 10 years as de-fined by the National Weather Service in technical paper no. 40, ‘‘Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States,’’ May 1961, and subsequent amendments or equivalent regional or State rainfall probability information developed therefrom.

(e) The term 25-year 24-hour rainfall event shall mean the maximum precipi-tation event with a probable recur-rence interval of once in 25 years as de-fined by the National Weather Service in technical paper no. 40, ‘‘Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States,’’ May, 1961, and subsequent amendments or equivalent regional or State rainfall probability information developed therefrom.

§ 422.42 Effluent limitations and guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Subject to the provisions of para-graphs (b), (c) and (d) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best practicable control technology currently available: There shall be no discharge of process waste water pol-lutants to navigable waters.

(b) Process waste water pollutants from a cooling water recirculation sys-tem designed, constructed and operated to maintain a surge capacity equal to the runoff from the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event may be discharged, after treatment to the standards set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, whenever chronic or catastrophic precipitation events cause the water level in the pond to rise into the surge capacity. Process waste water must be treated and discharged whenever the water level equals or exceeds the mid point of the surge capacity.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process waste water pur-suant to the limitations of paragraph (b) of this section shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride (as F) ..................... 75 25 TSS ...................................... 150 50 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

The total suspended solid limitation set forth in this paragraph shall be waived for process wastewater from a calcium sulfate storage pile runoff fa-cility, operated separately or in com-bination with a water recirculation system, which is chemically treated and then clarified or settled to meet the other pollutant limitations set forth in this paragraph.

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged in contaminated nonprocess wastewater shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride (as F) ..................... 75 25 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

§ 422.43 Effluent limitations and guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achiev-able.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, which may be dis-charged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable:

(a) Subject to the provisions of para-graphs (b), (c) and (d) of this section, the following limitations establish the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00648 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 422 ATTACHMENT F

639

Environmental Protection Agency § 422.45

quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable: There shall be no discharge of process wastewater pollutants to navigable waters.

(b) Process waste water pollutants from a cooling water recirculation sys-tem designed, constructed and operated to maintain a surge capacity equal to the runoff from the 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event may be discharged, after treatment to the standards set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, whenever chronic or catastrophic precipitation events cause the water level in the pond to rise into the surge capacity. Process waste water must be treated and discharged whenever the water level equals or exceeds the mid point of the surge capacity.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process waste water pur-suant to the limitations of paragraph (b) of this section shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride (as F) ..................... 75 25

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged in contaminated non-proc-ess wastewater shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride ................................ 75 25

[40 FR 25975, June 23, 1976, as amended at 44 FR 50742, Aug. 29, 1979]

§ 422.44 [Reserved]

§ 422.45 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

(a) Subject to the provisions of para-graphs (b), (c) and (d) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of standards of performance for new sources: There shall be no discharge of process wastewater pollutants to navi-gable waters.

(b) Process wastewater pollutants from a cooling water recirculation sys-tem designed, constructed and operated to maintain a surge capacity equal to the runoff from the 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event may be discharged, after treatment to the standards set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, whenever chronic or catastrophic precipitation events cause the water level in the pond to rise into the surge capacity. Process waste water must be treated and discharged whenever the water level equals or exceeds the mid point of the surge capacity.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process wastewater pur-suant to the limitations of paragraph (b) of this section shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride (as F) ..................... 75 25 TSS ...................................... 150 50 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

The total suspended solid limitation set forth in this paragraph shall be waived for process wastewater from a

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00649 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 422 ATTACHMENT F

640

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 422.46

calcium sulfate storage pile runoff fa-cility, operated separately or in com-bination with a water recirculation system, which is chemically treated and then clarified or settled to meet the other pollutant limitations set forth in this paragraph.

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged in contaminated non-proc-ess wastewater shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride (as F) ..................... 75 25 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

§ 422.46 [Reserved]

§ 422.47 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, which may be dis-charged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best conventional pol-lutant control technology:

(a) Subject to the provisions of para-graphs (b), (c) and (d) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best conventional pollutant control technology: There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

(b) Process waste water pollutants from a cooling water recirculation sys-tem designed, constructed and operated to maintain a surge capacity equal to the runoff from the 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event may be discharged, after treatment to the standards set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, whenever chronic or catastrophic precipitation events cause the water level in the pond to rise into the surge capacity.

Process waste water must be treated and discharged whenever the water level equals or exceeds the mid-point of the surge capacity.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process waste water pur-suant to the limitations of paragraph (b) of this section shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS ...................................... 150 50 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

The total suspended solid limitation set forth in this paragraph shall be waived for process waste water from a calcium sulfate storage pile runoff fa-cility, operated separately or in com-bination with a water recirculation system, which is chemically treated and then clarified or settled to meet the other pollutant limitations set forth in this paragraph.

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged in contaminated non-proc-ess waste water shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

[44 FR 50743, Aug. 29, 1979]

Subpart E—Defluorinated Phosphoric Acid Subcategory

SOURCE: 41 FR 25977, June 23, 1976, unless otherwise noted.

§ 422.50 Applicability; description of the defluorinated phosphoric acid subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the defluorination of phosphoric acid.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00650 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 422 ATTACHMENT F

641

Environmental Protection Agency § 422.52

Wet process phosphoric acid is dehy-drated by application of heat and other processing acids such as vacuum and air stripping. The acid is concentrated up to 70–73% P2 O5 in the defluorination process.

§ 422.51 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations, and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term process waste water means any water which, during manu-facturing or processing, comes into di-rect contact with or results from the production or use of any raw material, intermediate product, finished product, by-product, or waste product. The term ‘‘process waste water’’ does not include contaminated non-process waste water, as defined below.

(c) The term contaminated nonprocess waste water shall mean any water in-cluding precipitation runoff, which during manufacturing or processing, comes into incidental contact with any raw material, intermediate product, finished product, by-product or waste product by means of:

(1) Precipitation runoff, (2) acci-dental spills, (3) accidental leaks caused by the failure of process equip-ment and which are repaired or the dis-charge of pollutants therefrom con-tained or terminated within the short-est reasonable time which shall not ex-ceed 24 hours after discovery or when discovery should reasonably have been made, whichever is earliest, and (4) dis-charges from safety showers and re-lated personal safety equipment, and from equipment washings for the pur-pose of safe entry, inspection and maintenance; provided that all reason-able measures have been taken to pre-vent, reduce, eliminate and control to the maximum extent feasible such con-tact and provided further that all rea-sonable measures have been taken that will mitigate the effects of such con-tact once it has occurred.

(d) The term ten-year 24-hour rainfall event shall mean the maximum precipi-tation event with a probable recur-rence interval of once in 10 years as de-fined by the National Weather Service in technical paper no. 40, ‘‘Rainfall

Frequency Atlas of the United States,’’ May 1961, and subsequent amendments or equivalent regional or State rainfall probability information developed therefrom.

(e) The term 25-year 24-hour rainfall event shall mean the maximum precipi-tation event with a probable recur-rence interval of once in 25 years as de-fined by the National Weather Service in technical paper no. 40, ‘‘Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States,’’ May 1961, and subsequent amendments or equivalent regional or State rainfall probability information developed therefrom.

§ 422.52 Effluent limitations and guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

(a) Subject to the provisions of para-graphs (b), (c) and (d) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best practicable control technology currently available: There shall be no discharge of process wastewater pollut-ants to navigable waters.

(b) Process waste water pollutants from a cooling water recirculation sys-tem designed, constructed and operated to maintain a surge capacity equal to the runoff from the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event may be discharged, after treatment to the standards set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, whenever chronic or catastrophic precipitation events cause the water level in the pond to rise into the surge capacity. Process waste water must be treated and discharged whenever the water level equals or exceeds the mid point of the surge capacity.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process wastewater pur-suant to the limitations of paragraph (b) of this section shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00651 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 422 ATTACHMENT F

642

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 422.53

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride (as F) ..................... 75 25 TSS ...................................... 150 50 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

The total suspended solid limitation set forth in this paragraph shall be waived for process wastewater from a calcium sulfate storage pile runoff fa-cility, operated separately or in com-bination with a water recirculation system, which is chemically treated and then clarified or settled to meet the other pollutant limitations set forth in this paragraph.

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged in contaminated non-proc-ess wastewater shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride (as F) ..................... 75 25 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

§ 422.53 Effluent limitations and guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achiev-able.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or properties, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable:

(a) Subject to the provisions of para-graphs (b), (c) and (d) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically

achievable: There shall be no discharge of process wastewater pollutants to navigable waters.

(b) Process waste water pollutants from a cooling water recirculation sys-tem designed, constructed and operated to maintain a surge capacity equal to the runoff from the 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event may be discharged, after treatment to the standards set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, whenever chronic or catastrophic precipitation events cause the water level in the pond to rise into the surge capacity. Process waste water must be treated and discharged whenever the water level equals or exceeds the mid point of the surge capacity.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process waste water pur-suant to the limitations of paragraph (b) of this section shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride (as F) ..................... 75 25

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged in contaminated non-proc-ess wastewater shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride (as F) ..................... 75 25

[41 FR 25977, June 23, 1976, as amended at 44 FR 50743, Aug. 29, 1979]

§ 422.54 [Reserved]

§ 422.55 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following standards of perform-ance establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00652 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 422 ATTACHMENT F

643

Environmental Protection Agency § 422.57

(a) Subject to the provisions of para-graphs (b), (c) and (d) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of standards of performance for new sources: There shall be no discharge of process wastewater pollutants to navi-gable waters.

(b) Process waste water pollutants from a cooling water recirculation sys-tem designed, constructed and operated to maintain a surge capacity equal to the runoff from the 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event may be discharged, after treatment to the standards set forth in paragraph (c) of this section whenever chronic or catastrophic precipitation events cause the water level in the pond to rise into the surge capacity. Process waste water must be treated and discharged whenever the water level equals or exceeds the mid point of the surge capacity.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process wastewater pur-suant to the limitations of paragraph (b) of this section shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride (as F) ..................... 75 25 TSS ...................................... 150 50 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

The total suspended solid limitation set forth in this paragraph shall be waived for process wastewater from a calcium sulfate storage pile runoff fa-cility, operated separately or in com-bination with a water recirculation system, which is chemically treated and then clarified or settled to meet the other pollutant limitations set forth in this paragraph.

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged in contaminated non-proc-ess wastewater shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35 Fluoride (as F) ..................... 75 25 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

§ 422.56 [Reserved]

§ 422.57 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, which may be dis-charged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best conventional pol-lutant control technology:

(a) Subject to the provisions of para-graphs (b), (c) and (d) of this section, the following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best conventional pollutant control technology: There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

(b) Process waste water pollutants from a cooling water recirculation sys-tem designed, constructed and operated to maintain a surge capacity equal to the runoff from the 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event may be discharged, after treatment to the standards set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, whenever chronic or catastrophic precipitation events cause the water level in the pond to rise into the surge capacity. Process waste water must be treated and discharged whenever the water level equals or exceeds the mid-point of the surge capacity.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process waste water pur-suant to the limitations of paragraph (b) of this section shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00653 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 422 ATTACHMENT F

644

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 422.60

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS ...................................... 150 50 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

The total suspended solid limitation set forth in this paragraph shall be waived for process waste water from a calcium sulfate storage pile runoff fa-cility, operated separately or in com-bination with a water recirculation system, which is chemically treated and then clarified or settled to meet the other pollutant limitations set forth in this paragraph.

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged in contaminated non-proc-ess waste water shall not exceed the values listed in the following table:

[Milligrams per liter]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

[44 FR 50743, Aug. 27, 1979]

Subpart F—Sodium Phosphates Subcategory

SOURCE: 41 FR 25979, June 23, 1976, unless otherwise noted.

§ 422.60 Applicability; description of the sodium phosphates sub-category.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the manufacture of purified sodium phosphates from wet process phos-phoric acid.

§ 422.61 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: Except as provided below, the general

definitions, abbreviations and methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to this subpart.

§ 422.62 Effluent limitations and guide-lines representing the degree of ef-fluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently avail-able.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best practicable control technology currently available: [Metric units (kg/kkg of product); English units (lb/1,000 lb of

product)]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS ...................................... 0.50 0.25 Total phosphorus (as P) ...... .80 .40 Fluoride (as F) ..................... .30 .15 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

§ 422.63 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable: [Metric units (kg/kkg of product); English units (lb/1,000 lb of

product)]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 0.56 0.28 Fluoride (as F) ..................... .21 .11

[44 FR 50744, Aug. 29, 1979]

§ 422.64 [Reserved]

§ 422.65 Standards of performance for new sources.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00654 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 422 ATTACHMENT F

645

Environmental Protection Agency § 423.11

section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the standards of performance for new sources: [Metric units (kg/kkg of product); English units (lb/1,000 lb of

product)]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30

consecutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS ...................................... 0.35 0.18 Total phosphorus (as P) ...... .56 .28 Fluoride (as F) ..................... .21 .11 pH ........................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

§ 422.66 [Reserved]

§ 422.67 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology.

Except as provided in §§ 125.30 through 125.32, the following limita-tions establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, controlled by this section, which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best conventional pollutant control technology: [Metric units (kg/kkg of product); English units (lb/1,000 lb of

product)]

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed—

TSS .................................... 0 .35 0 .18 pH ...................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.5.

[51 FR 25000, July 9, 1986]

PART 423—STEAM ELECTRIC POWER GENERATING POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

Sec. 423.10 Applicability. 423.11 Specialized definitions. 423.12 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

423.13 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

423.14 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT). [Reserved]

423.15 New source performance standards (NSPS).

423.16 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

423.17 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

APPENDIX A TO PART 423—126 PRIORITY POL-LUTANTS

AUTHORITY: Secs. 301; 304(b), (c), (e), and (g); 306(b) and (c); 307(b) and (c); and 501, Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, as amended by Clean Water Act of 1977) (the ‘‘Act’’; 33 U.S.C. 1311; 1314(b), (c), (e), and (g); 1316(b) and (c); 1317(b) and (c); and 1361; 86 Stat. 816, Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567, Pub. L. 95–217), unless otherwise noted.

SOURCE: 47 FR 52304, Nov. 19, 1982, unless otherwise noted.

§ 423.10 Applicability.

The provisions of this part are appli-cable to discharges resulting from the operation of a generating unit by an es-tablishment primarily engaged in the generation of electricity for distribu-tion and sale which results primarily from a process utilizing fossil-type fuel (coal, oil, or gas) or nuclear fuel in con-junction with a thermal cycle employ-ing the steam water system as the thermodynamic medium.

§ 423.11 Specialized definitions.

In addition to the definitions set forth in 40 CFR part 401, the following definitions apply to this part:

(a) The term total residual chlorine (or total residual oxidants for intake water with bromides) means the value obtained using the amperometric method for total residual chlorine de-scribed in 40 CFR part 136.

(b) The term low volume waste sources means, taken collectively as if from one source, wastewater from all sources except those for which specific limitations are otherwise established in this part. Low volume wastes sources include, but are not limited to:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00655 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 422 ATTACHMENT F

276

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 434.10

434.42 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

434.43 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

434.44 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT). [Reserved]

434.45 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Subpart E—Post-Mining Areas

434.50 Applicability. 434.51 [Reserved] 434.52 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

434.53 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

434.54 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT). [Reserved]

434.55 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Subpart F—Miscellaneous Provisions

434.60 Applicability. 434.61 Commingling of waste streams. 434.62 Alternate effluent limitations for pH. 434.63 Effluent limitations for precipitation

events. 434.64 Procedure and method detection

limit for measurement of settleable sol-ids.

434.65 Modifications of NPDES Permits for New Sources.

Subpart G—Coal Remining

434.70 Specialized definitions. 434.71 Applicability. 434.72 Effluent limitations attainable by the

application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available (BPT).

434.73 Effluent limitations attainable by ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

434.74 Effluent limitations attainable by ap-plication of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT).

434.75 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Subpart H—Western Alkaline Coal Mining

434.80 Specialized definitions. 434.81 Applicability. 434.82 Effluent limitations attainable by the

application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available (BPT).

434.83 Effluent limitations attainable by ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

434.84 Effluent limitations attainable by ap-plication of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Reserved]

434.85 New source performance standards (NSPS).

APPENDIX A TO PART 434—ALTERNATE STORM LIMITATIONS FOR ACID OR FERRUGINOUS MINE DRAINAGE

APPENDIX B TO PART 434—BASELINE DETER-MINATION AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING FOR PRE-EXISTING DISCHARGES AT RE-MINING OPERATIONS

AUTHORITY: 33 U.S.C. 1311 1314(b), (c), (e), and (g), 1316(b) and (c), 1317(b) and (c), and 1361.

SOURCE: 50 FR 41305, Oct. 9, 1985, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart A—General Provisions

§ 434.10 Applicability. This part applies to discharges from

any coal mine at which the extraction of coal is taking place or is planned to be undertaken and to coal preparation plants and associated areas.

§ 434.11 General definitions. (a) The term ‘‘acid or ferruginous

mine drainage’’ means mine drainage which, before any treatment, either has a pH of less than 6.0 or a total iron concentration equal to or greater than 10 mg/l.

(b) The term ‘‘active mining area’’ means the area, on and beneath land, used or disturbed in activity related to the extraction, removal, or recovery of coal from its natural deposits. This term excludes coal preparation plants, coal preparation plant associated areas and post-mining areas.

(c) The term ‘‘alkaline, mine drain-age’’ means mine drainage which, be-fore any treatment, has a pH equal to or greater than 6.0 and total iron con-centration of less than 10 mg/l.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00286 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

277

Environmental Protection Agency § 434.11

(d) The term ‘‘bond release’’ means the time at which the appropriate reg-ulatory authority returns a reclama-tion or performance bond based upon its determination that reclamation work (including, in the case of under-ground mines, mine sealing and aban-donment procedures) has been satisfac-torily completed.

(e) The term ‘‘coal preparation plant’’ means a facility where coal is subjected to cleaning, concentrating, or other processing or preparation in order to separate coal from its impuri-ties and then is loaded for transit to a consuming facility.

(f) The term ‘‘coal preparation plant associated areas’’ means the coal prep-aration plant yards, immediate access roads, coal refuse piles and coal storage piles and facilities.

(g) The term ‘‘coal preparation plant water circuit’’ means all pipes, chan-nels, basins, tanks, and all other struc-tures and equipment that convey, con-tain, treat, or process any water that is used is coal preparation processes with-in a coal preparation plant.

(h) The term ‘‘mine drainage’’ means any drainage, and any water pumped or siphoned, from an active mining area or a post-mining area.

(i) The abbreviation ‘‘ml/l’’ means milliliters per liter.

(j)(1) Notwithstanding any other pro-vision of this Chapter, subject to para-graph (j)(2) of this section the term ‘‘new source coal mine’’ means a coal mine (excluding coal preparation plants and coal preparation plant asso-ciated areas) including an abandoned mine which is being re-mined.

(i) The construction of which is com-menced after May 4, 1984; or

(ii) Which is determined by the EPA Regional Administrator to constitute a ‘‘major alteration’’. In making this de-termination, the Regional Adminis-trator shall take into account whether one or more of the following events re-sulting in a new, altered or increased discharge of pollutants has occurred after May 4, 1984 in connection with the mine for which the NPDES permit is being considered:

(A) Extraction of a coal seam not previously extracted by that mine;

(B) Discharge into a drainage area not previously affected by wastewater discharge from the mine;

(C) Extensive new surface disruption at the mining operation;

(D) A construction of a new shaft, slope, or drift; and

(E) Such other factors as the Re-gional Administrator deems relevant.

(2) No provision in this part shall be deemed to affect the classification as a new source of a facility which was clas-sified as a new source coal mine under previous EPA regulations, but would not be classified as a new source under this section, as modified. Nor shall any provision in this part be deemed to af-fect the standards applicable to such facilities, except as provided in § 434.65 of this chapter.

(k) The term ‘‘post-mining area’’ means:

(1) A reclamation area or (2) The underground workings of an

underground coal mine after the ex-traction, removal, or recovery of coal from its natural deposit has ceased and prior to bond release.

(l) The term ‘‘reclamation area’’ means the surface area of a coal mine which has been returned to required contour and on which revegetation (specifically, seeding or planting) work has commenced.

(m) The term ‘‘settleable solids’’ is that matter measured by the volu-metric method specified in § 434.64.

(n) The terms ‘‘1-year, 2-year, and 10- year, 24-hour precipitation events’’ means the maximum 24-hour precipita-tion event with a probable recurrence interval of once in one, two, and ten years respectively as defined by the National Weather Service and Tech-nical Paper No. 40, ‘‘Rainfall Fre-quency Altas of the U.S.,’’ May 1961, or equivalent regional or rainfall prob-ability information developed there-from.

(o) The terms ‘‘treatment facility’’ and ‘‘treatment system’’ mean all structures which contain, convey, and as necessay, chemically or physically treat coal rine drainage, coal prepara-tion plant process wastewater, or drainage from coal preparation plant associated areas, which remove pollut-ants regulated by this part from such

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00287 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

278

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 434.20

waters. This includes all pipes, chan-nels, ponds, basins, tanks and all other equipment serving such structures.

(p) The term ‘‘coal refuse disposal pile’’ means any coal refuse deposited on the earth and intended as perma-nent dispoal or long-term storage (greater than 180 days) of such mate-rial, but does not include coal refuse deposited within the active mining area or coal refuse never removed from the active mining area.

(q) The term ‘‘controlled surface mine drainage’’ means any surface mine drainage that is pumped or si-phoned from the active mining area.

(r) The term ‘‘abandoned mine’’ means a mine where mining operations have occurred in the past and

(1) The applicable reclamation bond or financial assurance has been re-leased or forfeited or

(2) If no reclamation bond or other fi-nancial assurance has been posted, no mining operations have occurred for five years or more.

(s) The term ‘‘1-year, 24-hour precipi-tation event’’ means the maximum 24- hour precipitation event with a prob-able recurrence interval of once in one year as defined by the National Weath-er Service and Technical Paper No. 40, ‘‘Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the U.S.,’’ May 1961, or equivalent regional or rainfall probability information de-veloped therefrom.

(t) The Term ‘‘2-year, 24-hour precipi-tation event’’ means the maximum 24- hour precipitation event with a prob-able recurrence interval of once in two years as defined by the National Weather Service and Technical Paper No. 40, ‘‘Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the U.S., ‘‘May 1961, or equivalent re-gional or rainfall probability informa-tion developed therefrom.

Subpart B—Coal Preparation Plants and Coal Preparation Plant Associated Areas

§ 434.20 Applicability. The provisions of this subpart are ap-

plicable to discharges from coal prepa-ration plants and coal preparation plant association areas, as indicated, including discharges which are pumped, siphoned, or drained from the coal preparation plant water circuit

and coal storage, refuse storage, and ancillary areas related to the cleaning or beneficiation of coal of any rank in-cluding, but not limited to, bitu-minous, lignite, and anthracite.

§ 434.21 [Reserved]

§ 434.22 Effluent limitation guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30–125.32, 40 CFR 401.17, and §§ 434.61, 434.62 and 434.63 of this part, the fol-lowing limitations establish the con-centration or quality of pollutants which may be discharged by any exist-ing coal preparation plant and coal preparation plant associated areas sub-ject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available if discharges from such point sources normally exhibit a pH of less than 6.0 prior to treatment:

BPT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ............................... 7 .0 3 .5 Manganese, total ................... 4 .0 2 .0 TSS ........................................ 70 35 pH .......................................... 1 1

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.

(b) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30–125.32, 40 CFR 401.17 and §§ 434.61 and 434.63 of this part, the following limitations establish the concentration or quality of pollutants which may be discharged by any existing coal prepa-ration plant and coal preparation plant associated areas subject to the provi-sions of this subpart after application of the best practicable control tech-nology currently available if dis-charges from such point sources nor-mally exhibit a pH equal to or greater than 6.0 prior to treatment:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00288 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

279

Environmental Protection Agency § 434.25

BPT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ............................... 7 .0 3 .5 TSS ........................................ 70 35 pH .......................................... 1 1

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.

§ 434.23 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30–125.32, and §§ 434.61, 434.62 and 434.63 of this part, the following limita-tions establish the concentration or quality of pollutants which may be dis-charged by any existing coal prepara-tion plant and coal preparation plant associated areas subject to the provi-sions of this subpart after application of the best available technology eco-nomically achievable if discharges from such point sources normally ex-hibit a pH of less than 6.0 prior to treatment:

BAT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ................................... 7.0 3.5 Manganese, total ....................... 4.0 2.0

(b) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30–125.32, and §§ 434.61 and 434.63 of this part, the following limitations es-tablish the concentration or quality of pollutants which may be discharged by any existing coal preparation plant and coal preparation plant associated areas subject to the provisions of this sub-part after application of the best avail-able technology economically achiev-able if discharges from such point sources normally exhibit a pH equal to or greater than 6.0 prior to treatment:

BAT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ................................... 7.0 3.5

§ 434.24 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

§ 434.25 New source performance standards (NSPS).

The following new source perform-ance standards (NSPS) shall be achieved by any new source coal prepa-ration plant and coal preparation plant associated areas, as indicated:

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 401.17 and §§ 434.61, 434.62 and 434.63 of this part, the following new source per-formance standards shall apply to dis-charges from new source coal prepara-tion plants and new source coal prepa-ration plant associated areas, if such discharges normally exhibit a pH of less than 6.0 prior to treatment:

NSPS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS (MG/L)

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Iron, total ............................... 6 .0 3 .0 Manganese, total ................... 4 .0 2 .0 TSS ........................................ 70 35 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 6.0–9.0 at all times.

(b) Except as provided in 40 CFR 401.17 and §§ 434.61, 434.62 and 434.63 of this part, the following new source per-formance standards shall apply to dis-charges from new source coal prepara-tion plants and new source coal prepa-ration plant associated areas, if such discharges normally exhibit a pH equal to or greater than 6.0 prior to treat-ment:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00289 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

280

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 434.30

NSPS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS (MG/L)

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Iron, total ............................... 6 .0 3 .0 TSS ........................................ 70 35 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 6.0–9.0 at all times.

Subpart C—Acid or Ferruginous Mine Drainage

§ 434.30 Applicability; description of the acid or ferruginous mine drain-age subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to acid or ferruginous mine drainage from an active mining area resulting from the mining of coal of any rank including, but not limited to, bituminous, lignite, and anthracite.

§ 434.31 [Reserved]

§ 434.32 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30– 125.32, 40 CFR 401.17, and §§ 434.61, 434.62 and 434.63 of this part, the following limitations establish the concentration or quality of pollutants which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available:

BPT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ................................... 7.0 3.5 Manganese, total ....................... 4.0 2.0 TSS ............................................ 70.0 35.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.

§ 434.33 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30– 125.32, 40 CFR 401.17, and §§ 434.61, 434.62 and 434.63 of this part, the following limitations establish the concentration or quality of pollutants which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable:

BPT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ................................... 7.0 3.5 Manganese, total ....................... 4.0 2.0

§ 434.34 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

§ 434.35 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 401.17, and §§ 434.61, 434.62 and 434.63 of this part, the following new source perform-ance standards shall be achieved for any discharge from a new source sub-ject to this subpart:

NSPS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ................................... 6.0 3.0 Manganese, total ....................... 4.0 2.0 TSS ............................................ 70.0 35.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00290 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

281

Environmental Protection Agency § 434.52

Subpart D—Alkaline Mine Drainage

§ 434.40 Applicability; description of the alkaline mine drainage sub-category.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to alkaline mine drainage from an active mining area resulting from the mining of coal of any rank in-cluding, but not limited to, bitu-minous, lignite, and anthracite.

§ 434.41 [Reserved]

§ 434.42 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30– 125.32, 40 CFR 401.17, and §§ 434.61 and 434.63 of this part, the following limita-tions establish the concentration or quality of pollutants which may be dis-charged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available:

BPT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ............................... 7 .0 3 .5 TSS ........................................ 70 . 35 . pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.

§ 434.43 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30– 125.32, and §§ 434.61 and 434.63 of this part, the following limitations estab-lish the concentration or quality of pollutants which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after application of the best available technology economically achievable:

BAT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ................................... 7.0 3.5

§ 434.44 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

§ 434.45 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 401.17 and §§ 434.61 and 434.63 of this part, the following new source performance standards shall be achieved for any dis-charge from a new source subject to this subpart:

NSPS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ................................... 6.0 3.0 TSS ............................................ 70.0 35.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.

Subpart E—Post-Mining Areas

§ 434.50 Applicability. The provisions of this subpart are ap-

plicable to discharges from post-min-ing areas, except as provided in subpart H—Western Alkaline Coal Mining of this part.

[67 FR 3406, Jan. 23, 2002]

§ 434.51 [Reserved]

§ 434.52 Effluent limitations quidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

(a) Reclamation areas. The limitations in this subsection apply to discharges from reclamation areas until the per-formance bond issued to the facility by

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00291 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

282

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 434.53

the appropriate SMCRA authority has been released.

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30– 125.32, 40 CFR 401.17 and §§ 434.61 and 434.63(d)(2) of this part, the following limitations establish the concentration or quality of pollutants which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subsection after application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available:

BPT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Limitations

Settleable Solids .................... 0.5 ml/l maximum not to be exceeded.

pH .......................................... (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.

(b) Underground mine drainage. The limitations in this subsection apply to discharges from the underground work-ings of underground mines until SMCRA bond release.

(1) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30–125.32, 40 CFR 401.17 and §§ 434.61, 434.62 and 434.63 of this part, the fol-lowing limitations establish the con-centration of quality of pollutants in acid or ferruginous mine drainage sub-ject to the provisions of this subsection after application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available:

BPT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ................................... 7.0 3.5 Manganese, total ....................... 4.0 2.0 TSS ............................................ 70.0 35.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.

(2) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30–125.32, 40 CFR 401.17, and §§ 434.61 and 434.63 of this part, the following limitations establish the concentration or quality of pollutants in alkaline mine drainage subject to the provisions of this subsection after application of the best practicable control technology currently available:

BPT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ................................... 7.0 3.5 TSS ............................................ 70.0 35.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.

§ 434.53 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

(a) Reclamation areas. The limitations of this subsection apply to discharges from reclamation areas until SMCRA bond release.

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30– 125.32, and §§ 434.61 and 434.63(d)(2) of this part, the following limitations es-tablish the concentration or quality of pollutants which may be discharged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subsection after application of the best available technology economi-cally achievable:

BAT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Limitations

Settleable solids .................... 0.5 ml/l maximum not to be exceeded.

(b) Underground mine drainage. The limitations in this subsection apply to discharges from the underground work-ings of underground mines until SMCRA bond release.

(1) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30–125.32, and §§ 434.61, 434.62, and 434.63 of this part, the following limita-tions establish the concentration or quality of pollutants in acid or ferrugi-nous mine drainage subject to the pro-visions of this subsection after applica-tion of the best available technology economically achievable:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00292 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

283

Environmental Protection Agency § 434.61

BAT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ................................... 7.0 3.5 Manganese, total ....................... 4.0 2.0

(2) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30–125.32, and §§ 434.61, and 434.63 of this part, the following limitations es-tablish the concentration or quality of pollutants in alkaline mine drainage subject to the provisions of this sub-section after application of the best available technology economically achievable:

BAT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentration in mg/l

Iron, total ................................... 7.0 3.5

§ 434.54 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

§ 434.55 New source performance standards (NSPS).

The following new source perform-ance standards shall apply to the post- mining areas of all new source coal mines:

(a) Reclamation areas. The standards of this subsection apply to discharges from reclamation areas at new source coal mines until SMCRA bond release. Except as provided in 40 CFR 401.17 and §§ 434.61 and 434.63 (d)(2) of this part, the following new source performance standards shall be achieved for a dis-charge subject to the provisions of this subsection:

NSPS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Limitations

Settleable Solids .................... 0.5 ml/1 maximum not to be exceeded.

pH .......................................... (1)

(1) Within the range 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.

(b) Underground mine drainage. The standards in this subsection apply to discharges from the underground work-ings of new source underground mines until bond release.

(1) Except as provided in 40 CFR 401.17 and §§ 434.61, 434.62, and 434.63 of this part, the following new source per-formance standards shall be achieved for the discharge of any acid or ferrugi-nous mine drainage subject to this sub-section:

NSPS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentrations in mg/1

Iron, total ................................... 6.0 3.0 Manganese, total ....................... 4.0 2.0 TSS ............................................ 70.0 35.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.

(2) Except as provided in 40 CFR 401.17 and §§ 434.61 and 434.63 of this part, the following new source perform-ance standards shall be achieved for the discharge of any alkaline mine drainage subject to this subsection:

NSPS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Concentrations in mg/1

Iron, total ................................... 6.0 3.0 TSS ............................................ 70.0 35.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.

Subpart F—Miscellaneous Provisions

§ 434.60 Applicability. The provisions of this subpart F

apply to this part 434 as specified in subparts B, C, D, E and G of this part.

[67 FR 3406, Jan. 23, 2002]

§ 434.61 Commingling of waste streams.

Where waste streams from any facil-ity covered by this part are combined for treatment or discharge with waste streams from another facility covered

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00293 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

284

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 434.62

by this part, the concentration of each pollutant in the combined discharge may not exceed the most stringent lim-itations for that pollutant applicable to any component waste stream of the discharge.

§ 434.62 Alternate effluent limitation for pH.

Where the application of neutraliza-tion and sedimentation treatment technology results in inability to com-ply with the otherwise applicable man-ganese limitations, the permit issuer may allow the pH level in the final ef-fluent to exceed 9.0 to a small extent in order that the manganese limitations can be achieved.

§ 434.63 Effluent limitations for pre-cipitation events.

(a)(1) The alternate limitations speci-fied in paragraph (a)(2) of this section apply with respect to:

(i) All discharges of alkaline mine drainage except discharges from under-ground workings of underground mines that are not commingled with other discharges eligible for these alternate limitations;

(ii) All discharges from steep slope areas, (as defined in section 515(d)(4) of the Surface Mining Control and Rec-lamation Act of 1977, as amended (SMCRA)), and from mountaintop re-moval operations (conducted pursuant to section 515(c) of SMCRA);

(iii) Discharges from coal preparation plants and preparation plant associated areas (excluding acid or ferruginous mine drainage from coal refuse dis-posal piles).

(2) Any discharge or increase in the volume of a discharge caused by pre-cipitation within any 24 hour period less than or equal to the 10-year, 24- hour precipitation event (or snowmelt of equivalent volume) may comply with the following limitations instead of the otherwise applicable limitations:

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS DURING PRECIPITATION

Pollutant or pollutant property Effluent limitations

Settleable solids .................... 0.5 ml/1 maximum not to be exceeded.

pH .......................................... 6.0–9.0 at all times.

(b) The following alternate limita-tions apply with respect to acid or fer-

ruginous drainage from coal refuse dis-posal piles:

Any discharge or increase in the volume of a discharge caused by precipitation within any 24 hour period greater than the 1-year, 24-hour precipitation event, but less than or equal to the 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event (or snowmelt of equivalent volume) may comply with the following limitations instead of the otherwise applicable limita-tions:

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS DURING PRECIPITATION

Pollutant or pollutant property Effluent limitations

Settleable solids .................... 0.5 ml/1 maximum not to be exceeded.

pH .......................................... 6.0–9.0 at all times.

(c) The following alternate limita-tions apply with respect to acid or fer-ruginous mine drainage, except for dis-charges addressed in paragraphs (a) (mountaintop removal and steep slope areas), (d) (controlled surface mine dis-charges) and (f) (discharges from un-derground workings of underground mines) of this section:

(1) Any discharge or increase in the volume of a discharge caused by pre-cipitation within any 24 hour period less than or equal to the 2-year, 24-hour precipitation event (or snowmelt of equivalent volume) may comply with the following limitations instead of the otherwise applicable limitations:

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS DURING PRECIPITATION

Pollutant or pollutant property Effluent limitations

Iron, total ................................ 7.0 mg/l maximum for any 1 day.

Settleable solids .................... 0.5 ml/l maximum not to be exceeded.

pH .......................................... 6.0–9.0 at all times.

(2) Any discharge or increase in the volume of a discharge caused by pre-cipitation within any 24 hour period greater than the 2-year, 24-hour pre-cipitation event, but less than or equal to the 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event (or snowmelt of equivalent vol-ume) may comply with the following limitations instead of the otherwise ap-plicable limitations:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00294 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

284

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 434.62

by this part, the concentration of each pollutant in the combined discharge may not exceed the most stringent lim-itations for that pollutant applicable to any component waste stream of the discharge.

§ 434.62 Alternate effluent limitation for pH.

Where the application of neutraliza-tion and sedimentation treatment technology results in inability to com-ply with the otherwise applicable man-ganese limitations, the permit issuer may allow the pH level in the final ef-fluent to exceed 9.0 to a small extent in order that the manganese limitations can be achieved.

§ 434.63 Effluent limitations for pre-cipitation events.

(a)(1) The alternate limitations speci-fied in paragraph (a)(2) of this section apply with respect to:

(i) All discharges of alkaline mine drainage except discharges from under-ground workings of underground mines that are not commingled with other discharges eligible for these alternate limitations;

(ii) All discharges from steep slope areas, (as defined in section 515(d)(4) of the Surface Mining Control and Rec-lamation Act of 1977, as amended (SMCRA)), and from mountaintop re-moval operations (conducted pursuant to section 515(c) of SMCRA);

(iii) Discharges from coal preparation plants and preparation plant associated areas (excluding acid or ferruginous mine drainage from coal refuse dis-posal piles).

(2) Any discharge or increase in the volume of a discharge caused by pre-cipitation within any 24 hour period less than or equal to the 10-year, 24- hour precipitation event (or snowmelt of equivalent volume) may comply with the following limitations instead of the otherwise applicable limitations:

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS DURING PRECIPITATION

Pollutant or pollutant property Effluent limitations

Settleable solids .................... 0.5 ml/1 maximum not to be exceeded.

pH .......................................... 6.0–9.0 at all times.

(b) The following alternate limita-tions apply with respect to acid or fer-

ruginous drainage from coal refuse dis-posal piles:

Any discharge or increase in the volume of a discharge caused by precipitation within any 24 hour period greater than the 1-year, 24-hour precipitation event, but less than or equal to the 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event (or snowmelt of equivalent volume) may comply with the following limitations instead of the otherwise applicable limita-tions:

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS DURING PRECIPITATION

Pollutant or pollutant property Effluent limitations

Settleable solids .................... 0.5 ml/1 maximum not to be exceeded.

pH .......................................... 6.0–9.0 at all times.

(c) The following alternate limita-tions apply with respect to acid or fer-ruginous mine drainage, except for dis-charges addressed in paragraphs (a) (mountaintop removal and steep slope areas), (d) (controlled surface mine dis-charges) and (f) (discharges from un-derground workings of underground mines) of this section:

(1) Any discharge or increase in the volume of a discharge caused by pre-cipitation within any 24 hour period less than or equal to the 2-year, 24-hour precipitation event (or snowmelt of equivalent volume) may comply with the following limitations instead of the otherwise applicable limitations:

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS DURING PRECIPITATION

Pollutant or pollutant property Effluent limitations

Iron, total ................................ 7.0 mg/l maximum for any 1 day.

Settleable solids .................... 0.5 ml/l maximum not to be exceeded.

pH .......................................... 6.0–9.0 at all times.

(2) Any discharge or increase in the volume of a discharge caused by pre-cipitation within any 24 hour period greater than the 2-year, 24-hour pre-cipitation event, but less than or equal to the 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event (or snowmelt of equivalent vol-ume) may comply with the following limitations instead of the otherwise ap-plicable limitations:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00294 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

285

Environmental Protection Agency § 434.70

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS DURING PRECIPITATION

Pollutant or pollutant property Effluent limitations

Settleable solids .................... 0.5 ml/l maximum not to be exceeded.

pH .......................................... 6.0–9.0 at all times.

(d)(1) The alternate limitations speci-fied in paragraph (d)(2) of this section apply with respect to all discharges de-scribed in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of this section and to:

(i) Discharges of acid or ferruginous mine drainage from underground work-ings of underground mines which are commingled with other discharges eli-gible for these alternate limitations; and

(ii) Controlled acid or ferruginous surface mine discharges; and

(iii) Discharges from reclamation areas.

(2) Any discharge or increase in the volume of a discharge caused by pre-cipitation within any 24 hour period greater than the 10-year, 24-hour pre-cipitation event (or snowmelt of equiv-alent volume) may comply with the following limitations instead of the otherwise applicable limitations:

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS DURING PRECIPITATION

Pollutant or pollutant property Effluent limitations

pH .......................................... 6.0–9.0 at all times.

(e) The operator shall have the bur-den of proof that the discharge or in-crease in discharge was caused by the applicable precipitation event de-scribed in paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this section.

(f) Discharges of mine drainage from underground workings of underground mines which are not commingled with discharges eligible for alternate limita-tions set forth in this section shall in no event be eligible for the alternate limitations set forth in this section.

§ 434.64 Procedure and method detec-tion limit for measurement of settle-able solids.

For the purposes of this part, the fol-lowing procedure shall be used to de-termine settleable solids: Fill an Imhoff cone to the one-liter mark with a thoroughly mixed sample. Allow to settle undisturbed for 45 minutes. Gently stir along the inside surface of

the cone with a stirring rod. Allow to settle undisturbed for 15 minutes longer. Record the volume of settled material in the cone as milliliters per liter. Where a separation of settleable and floating materials occurs, do not include the floating material in the reading. Notwithstanding any provi-sion of 40 CFR part 136, the method de-tection limit for measuring settleable solids under this part shall be 0.4 ml/l.

§ 434.65 Modification of NPDES per-mits for new sources.

Any coal mine or coal preparation plant which was considered a new source under previous EPA regulations may, notwithstanding § 122.62 of this chapter, apply to have its NPDES per-mit modified to incorporate the revised new source performance standards.

Subpart G—Coal Remining

SOURCE: 67 FR 3406, Jan. 23, 2002, unless otherwise noted.

§ 434.70 Specialized definitions. (a) The term coal remining operation

means a coal mining operation at a site on which coal mining was previously conducted and where the site has been abandoned or the performance bond has been forfeited.

(b) The term pollution abatement area means the part of the permit area that is causing or contributing to the base-line pollution load of pre-existing dis-charges. The pollution abatement area must include, to the extent prac-ticable, areas adjacent to and nearby the remining operation that also must be affected to reduce the pollution load of the pre-existing discharges and may include the immediate location of the pre-existing discharges.

(c) The term pre-existing discharge means any discharge resulting from mining activities that have been aban-doned prior to the time of a remining permit application. This term shall in-clude a pre-existing discharge that is relocated as a result of the implemen-tation of best management practices (BMPs) contained in the Pollution Abatement Plan.

(d) The term steep slope means any slope above twenty degrees or such lesser slope as may be defined by the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00295 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

286

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 434.71

regulatory authority after consider-ation of soil, climate, and other char-acteristics of a region or State. This term does not apply to those situations in which an operator is mining on flat or gently rolling terrain, on which an occasional steep slope is encountered and through which the mining oper-ation is to proceed, leaving a plain or predominantly flat area.

(e) The term new source remining oper-ation means a remining operation at a coal mine where mining first com-mences after February 22, 2002 and sub-sequently becomes an abandoned mine.

§ 434.71 Applicability. (a) This subpart applies to pre-exist-

ing discharges that are located within or are hydrologically connected to pol-lution abatement areas of a coal re-mining operation.

(b) A pre-existing discharge that is intercepted by active mining or that is commingled with waste streams from active mining areas for treatment is subject to the provisions of § 434.61 Commingling of waste streams. For the purposes of this subpart, § 434.61 re-quires compliance with applicable BPT, BAT, BCT, and NSPS effluent limitations in subparts C, D, and F of this part. Section 434.61 applies to the commingled waste stream only during the time when the pre-existing dis-charge is intercepted by active mining or is commingled with active mine wastewater for treatment or discharge. After commingling has ceased, the pre- existing discharge is subject to the pro-visions of this part.

(c) In situations where coal remining operations seek reissuance of an exist-ing remining permit with BPJ limita-tions and the regulatory authority de-termines that it is not feasible for a re-

mining operator to re-establish base-line pollutant levels in accordance with the statistical procedures con-tained in Appendix B of this part, pre- existing discharge limitations at exist-ing remining operations shall remain subject to baseline pollutant levels es-tablished during the original permit application.

(d) The effluent limitations in this subpart apply to pre-existing dis-charges until the appropriate SMCRA authority has authorized bond release.

§ 434.72 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT).

(a) The operator must submit a site- specific Pollution Abatement Plan to the permitting authority for the pollu-tion abatement area. The plan must be approved by the permitting authority and incorporated into the permit as an effluent limitation. The Pollution Abatement Plan must identify charac-teristics of the pollution abatement area and the pre-existing discharges. The Pollution Abatement Plan must be designed to reduce the pollution load from pre-existing discharges and must identify the selected best management practices (BMPs) to be used. The plan must describe the design specifica-tions, construction specifications, maintenance schedules, criteria for monitoring and inspection, and ex-pected performance of the BMPs. The BMPs must be implemented as speci-fied in the plan.

(b) (1) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32 and paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the following ef-fluent limits apply to pre-existing dis-charges:

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Pollutant Requirement

(i) Iron, total ................................................................................. May not exceed baseline loadings (as defined by Appendix B of this part).

(ii) Manganese, total .................................................................... May not exceed baseline loadings (as defined by Appendix B of this part).

(iii) Acidity, net ............................................................................. May not exceed baseline loadings (as defined by Appendix B of this part).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00296 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

287

Environmental Protection Agency § 434.80

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS—Continued

Pollutant Requirement

(iv) TSS ........................................................................................ During remining and reclamation, may not exceed baseline loadings (as defined by Appendix B of this part).

Prior to bond release, the pre-existing discharge must meet the applicable standards for TSS or SS contained in Subpart E. 1

1 A pre-existing discharge is exempt from meeting standards in Subpart E of this part for TSS and SS when the permitting au-thority determines that Subpart E standards are infeasible or impractical based on the site-specific conditions of soil, climate, to-pography, steep slopes, or other baseline conditions provided that the operator demonstrates that significant reductions of TSS and SS will be achieved through the incorporation of sediment control BMPs into the Pollution Abatement Plan as required by paragraph (a) of this section.

(2) If the permitting authority deter-mines that it is infeasible to collect samples for establishing the baseline pollutant levels pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and that remining will result in significant improvement that would not otherwise occur, then the numeric effluent limitations in paragraph (b)(1) of this section do not apply. Pre-existing discharges for which it is infeasible to collect samples for determination of baseline pollutant levels include, but are not limited to, discharges that exist as a diffuse groundwater flow that cannot be as-sessed via sample collection; a base flow to a receiving stream that cannot be monitored separate from the receiv-ing stream; a discharge on a steep or hazardous slope that is inaccessible for sample collection; or, a number of pre- existing discharges so extensive that monitoring of individual discharges is infeasible.

§ 434.73 Effluent limitations attainable by application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32 and 434.72(b)(2), a pre-ex-isting discharge must comply with the effluent limitations listed in § 434.72(b) for net acidity, iron and manganese. The operator must also submit and im-plement a Pollution Abatement Plan as required in § 434.72(a) .

§ 434.74 Effluent limitations attainable by application of the best conven-tional pollutant control technology (BCT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32 and 434.72(b)(2), a pre-ex-isting discharge must comply with the effluent limitations listed in § 434.72(b) for total suspended solids. The operator

must also submit and implement a Pol-lution Abatement Plan as required in § 434.72(a).

§ 434.75 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Except as provided in § 434.72(b)(2), a pre-existing discharge from a new source remining operation must com-ply with the effluent limitations listed in § 434.72(b) for iron, manganese, acid-ity and total suspended solids. The op-erator must also submit and imple-ment a Pollution Abatement Plan as required in § 434.72(a).

Subpart H—Western Alkaline Coal Mining

SOURCE: 67 FR 3407, Jan. 23, 2002, unless otherwise noted.

§ 434.80 Specialized definitions. (a) The term brushing and grubbing

area means the area where woody plant materials that would interfere with soil salvage operations have been re-moved or incorporated into the soil that is being salvaged.

(b) The term regraded area means the surface area of a coal mine that has been returned to required contour.

(c) The term sediment means undissolved organic and inorganic ma-terial transported or deposited by water.

(d) The term sediment yield means the sum of the soil losses from a surface minus deposition in macro-topographic depressions, at the toe of the hillslope, along field boundaries, or in terraces and channels sculpted into the hillslope.

(e) The term topsoil stockpiling area means the area outside the mined-out area where topsoil is temporarily

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00297 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

288

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 434.81

stored for use in reclamation, including containment berms.

(f) The term western coal mining oper-ation means a surface or underground coal mining operation located in the interior western United States, west of the 100th meridian west longitude, in an arid or semiarid environment with an average annual precipitation of 26.0 inches or less.

§ 434.81 Applicability. (a) This subpart applies to alkaline

mine drainage at western coal mining operations from reclamation areas, brushing and grubbing areas, topsoil stockpiling areas, and regraded areas.

(b) This subpart applies to drainage at western coal mining operations from reclamation areas, brushing and grub-bing areas, topsoil stockpiling areas, and regraded areas where the dis-charge, before any treatment, meets all the following requirements:

(1) pH is equal to or greater than 6.0; (2) Dissolved iron concentration is

less than 10 mg/L; and (3) Net alkalinity is greater than

zero. (c) The effluent limitations in this

subpart apply until the appropriate SMCRA authority has authorized bond release.

§ 434.82 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, the following effluent limitations apply to mine drainage from applicable areas of western coal mining operations:

(a) The operator must submit a site- specific Sediment Control Plan to the permitting authority that is designed to prevent an increase in the average annual sediment yield from pre-mined,

undisturbed conditions. The Sediment Control Plan must be approved by the permitting authority and be incor-porated into the permit as an effluent limitation. The Sediment Control Plan must identify best management prac-tices (BMPs) and also must describe de-sign specifications, construction speci-fications, maintenance schedules, cri-teria for inspection, as well as expected performance and longevity of the best management practices.

(b) Using watershed models, the oper-ator must demonstrate that implemen-tation of the Sediment Control Plan will result in average annual sediment yields that will not be greater than the sediment yield levels from pre-mined, undisturbed conditions. The operator must use the same watershed model that was, or will be, used to acquire the SMCRA permit.

(c) The operator must design, imple-ment, and maintain BMPs in the man-ner specified in the Sediment Control Plan.

§ 434.83 Effluent limitations attainable by application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing western coal mining operation with drainage subject to this subpart must meet the effluent limitations in § 434.82.

§ 434.84 Effluent limitations attainable by application of the best conven-tional pollutant control technology (BCT). [Reserved]

§ 434.85 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Any new source western coal mining operation with drainage subject to this subpart must meet the effluent limita-tions in § 434.82.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00298 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

289

Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 434, App. A

APPENDIX A TO PART 434—ALTERNATE STORM LIMITATIONS FOR ACID OR FERRUGINOUS MINE DRAINAGE

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00299 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8006 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170 EC

01M

Y92

.113

</G

PH

>

yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

290

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) Pt. 434, App. B

APPENDIX B TO PART 434—BASELINE DE-TERMINATION AND COMPLIANCE MON-ITORING FOR PRE-EXISTING DIS-CHARGES AT REMINING OPERATIONS

I. GENERAL PROCEDURE REQUIREMENTS

a. This appendix presents the procedures to be used for establishing effluent limitations for pre-existing discharges at coal remining operations, in accordance with the require-ments set forth in Subpart G; Coal Re-mining. The requirements specify that pol-lutant loadings of total iron, total man-ganese, total suspended solids, and net acid-ity in pre-existing discharges shall not ex-ceed baseline pollutant loadings. The proce-dures described in this appendix shall be used for determining site-specific, baseline pollut-ant loadings, and for determining whether discharge loadings during coal remining op-erations have exceeded the baseline loading. Both a monthly (single-observation) proce-dure and an annual procedure shall be ap-plied, as described below.

b. In order to sufficiently characterize pol-lutant loadings during baseline determina-tion and during each annual monitoring pe-riod, it is required that at least one sample result be obtained per month for a period of 12 months.

c. Calculations described in this appendix must be applied to pollutant loadings. Each loading value is calculated as the product of a flow measurement and pollutant con-centration taken on the same date at the same discharge sampling point, using stand-ard units of flow and concentration (to be de-termined by the permitting authority). For example, flow may be measured in cubic feet per second, concentration in milligrams per liter, and the pollutant loading could be cal-culated in pounds per year.

d. Accommodating Data Below the Max-imum Daily Limit at subpart C of this part. In the event that a pollutant concentration in the data used to determine baseline is lower than the daily maximum limitation established in subpart C of this part for ac-tive mine wastewater, the statistical proce-dures should not establish a baseline more stringent than the BPT and BAT effluent standards established in subpart C of this part. Therefore, if the total iron concentra-tion in a baseline sample is below 7.0 mg/L, or the total manganese concentration is below 4.0 mg/L, the baseline sample con-centration may be replaced with 7.0 mg/L and 4.0 mg/L, respectively, for the purposes of some of the statistical calculations in this Appendix B. The substituted values should be used for all methods in this Appendix B with the exception of the calculation of the interquartile range (R) in Method 1 for the annual trigger (Step 3), and in Method 2 for the single observation trigger (Step 3). The interquartile range (R) is the difference be-

tween the quartiles M–1 and M1; these values should be calculated using actual loadings (based on measured concentrations) when they are used to calculate R. This should be done in order to account for the full range of variability in the data.

II. PROCEDURE FOR CALCULATING AND APPLY-ING A SINGLE-OBSERVATION (MONTHLY) TRIGGER

Two alternative methods are provided for calculating a single-observation trigger. One method must be selected and applied by the permitting authority for any given remining permit.

A. Method 1 for Calculating a Single Observation Trigger (L)

(1) Count the number of baseline observa-tions taken for the pollutant of interest. Label this number n. In order to sufficiently characterize pollutant loadings during base-line determination and during each annual monitoring period, it is required that at least one sample result be obtained per month for a period of 12 months.

(2) Order all baseline loading observations from lowest to highest. Let the lowest num-ber (minimum) be x(1), the next lowest be x(2), and so forth until the highest number (max-imum) is x(n).

(3) If fewer than 17 baseline observations were obtained, then the single observation trigger (L) will equal the maximum of the baseline observations (x(n)).

(4) If at least 17 baseline observations were obtained, calculate the median (M) of all baseline observations:

Instructions for calculation of a median of n observations:

If n is odd, then M equals x(n/2∂1/2). For example, if there are 17 observations,

then M = X(17/2+1/2) = x(9), the 9th highest ob-servation.

If n is even, then M equals 0.5 * (x(n/2) + x(n/2∂1)).

For example, if there are 18 observations, then M equals 0.5 multiplied by the sum of the 9th and 10th highest observations.

(a) Next, calculate M1 as the median of the subset of observations that range from the calculated M to the maximum x(n); that is, calculate the median of all x larger than or equal to M.

(b) Next, calculate M2 as the median of the subset of observations that range from the calculated M1 to x(n) ; that is, calculate the median of all x larger than or equal to M1.

(c) Next, calculate M3 as the median of the subset of observations that range from the calculated M2 to x(n) ; that is, calculate the median of all x larger than or equal to M2.

(d) Finally, calculate the single observa-tion trigger (L) as the median of the subset of observations that range from the cal-culated M3 to x(n).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00300 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

291

Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 434, App. B

NOTE: When subsetting the data for each of steps 3a–3d, the subset should include all ob-servations greater than or equal to the me-dian calculated in the previous step. If the median calculated in the previous step is not an actual observation, it is not included in the new subset of observations. The new me-dian value will then be calculated using the median procedure, based on whether the number of points in the subset is odd or even.

(5) Method for applying the single observa-tion trigger (L) to determine when the base-line level has been exceeded

If two successive monthly monitoring ob-servations both exceed L, immediately begin weekly monitoring for four weeks (four weekly samples).

(a) If three or fewer of the weekly observa-tions exceed L, resume monthly monitoring

(b) If all four weekly observations exceed L, the baseline pollution loading has been ex-ceeded.

B. Method 2 for Calculating a Single Observation Trigger (L)

(1) Follow Method 1 above to obtain M1 (the third quartile, that is, the 75th per-centile).

(2) Calculate M¥1 as the median of the baseline data which are less than or equal to the sample median M.

(3) Calculate interquartile range, R = (M1 ¥ M¥1).

(4) Calculate the single observation trigger L as L = M1 + 3 * R

(5) If two successive monthly monitoring observations both exceed L, immediately begin weekly monitoring for four weeks (four weekly samples).

(a) If three or fewer of the weekly observa-tions exceed L, resume monthly monitoring

(b) If all four weekly observations exceed L, the baseline pollution loading has been ex-ceeded.

III. PROCEDURE FOR CALCULATING AND APPLYING AN ANNUAL TRIGGER

A. Method 1 for Calculating and Applying an Annual Trigger (T)

(1) Calculate M and M1 of the baseline load-ing data as described above under Method 1 for the single observation trigger.

(2) Calculate M¥1 as the median of the baseline data which are less than or equal to the sample median M.

(3) Calculate the interquartile range, R = (M1 ¥ M¥1).

(4) The annual trigger for baseline (Tb) is calculated as:

Tb MR

n= + ∗( . )1815

where n is the number of baseline loading ob-servations. (5) To compare baseline loading data to ob-

servations from the annual monitoring pe-riod, repeat steps 1–3 for the set of moni-toring observations. Label the results of the calculations M′ and R′. Let m be the number of monitoring observations.

(6) The subtle trigger (Tm) of the moni-toring data is calculated as:

Tm MR

m= ′ − ∗ ′( . )1815

(7) If Tm > Tb, the median loading of the monitoring observations has exceeded the baseline loading.

B. Method 2 for Calculating and Applying an Annual Trigger (T)

Method 2 applies the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whit-ney test to determine whether the median loading of the monitoring observations has exceeded the baseline median. No baseline value T is calculated.

(1) Steps for Conducting the Wilcoxon-Mann- Whitney Test

(a) Let n be the number of baseline loading observations taken, and let m be the number of monitoring loading observations taken. In order to sufficiently characterize pollutant loadings during baseline determination and during each annual monitoring period, it is required that at least one sample result be obtained per month for a period of 12 months.

(b) Order the combined baseline and moni-toring observations from smallest to largest.

(c) Assign a rank to each observation based on the assigned order: the smallest observa-tion will have rank 1, the next smallest will have rank 2, and so forth, up to the highest observation, which will have rank n + m.

(1) If two or more observations are tied (have the same value), then the average rank for those observations should be used. For example, suppose the following four values are being ranked: 3, 4, 6, 4 Since 3 is the lowest of the four numbers, it would be assigned a rank of 1. The highest of the four numbers is 6, and would be assigned a rank of 4. The other two numbers are both 4. Rather than assign one a rank of 2 and the other a rank of 3, the average of 2 and 3 (i.e., 2.5) is given to both numbers.

(d) Sum all the assigned ranks of the n baseline observations, and let this sum be Sn.

(e) Obtain the critical value (C) from Table 1. When 12 monthly data are available for both baseline and monitoring (i.e., n = 12 and m = 12), the critical value C is 99.

(f) Compare C to Sn. If Sn is less than C, then the monitoring loadings have exceeded the baseline loadings.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00301 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170 ER

23JA

02.0

02<

/MA

TH

>E

R23

JA02

.003

</M

AT

H>

yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

292

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) Pt. 434, App. B

(2) Example Calculations for the Wilcoxon- Mann-Whitney Test

BASELINE DATA

8.0 9.0 9.0 10.0 12.0 15.0 17.0 18.0 21.0 23.0 28.0 30.0

MONITORING DATA

9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 24.0 29.0 31.0

BASELINE RANKS

1.0 3.0 3.0 5.5 8.5 12.0 14.0 15.5 18.0 19.0 21.0 23.0

MONITORING RANKS

3.0 5.5 7.0 8.5 10.0 11.0 13.0 15.5 17.0 20.0 22.0 24.0

SUM OF RANKS FOR BASELINE IS SN = 143.5, CRITICAL VALUE IS Cn, m = 99.

(3) Critical Values for the Wilcoxon-Mann- Whitney Test

(a) When n and m are less than 21, use Table 1.

In order to find the appropriate critical value, match column with correct n (number of baseline observations) to row with correct m (number of monitoring observations)*.

TABLE 1—CRITICAL VALUES (C) OF THE WILCOXON-MANN-WHITNEY TEST (for a one-sided test at the 0.001 significance level)

n m

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

10 .......................... 66 79 93 109 125 142 160 179 199 220 243

11 .......................... 68 82 96 112 128 145 164 183 204 225 248

12 .......................... 70 84 99 115 131 149 168 188 209 231 253

13 .......................... 73 87 102 118 135 153 172 192 214 236 259

14 .......................... 75 89 104 121 138 157 176 197 218 241 265

15 .......................... 77 91 107 124 142 161 180 201 223 246 270

16 .......................... 79 94 110 127 145 164 185 206 228 251 276

17 .......................... 81 96 113 130 149 168 189 211 233 257 281

18 .......................... 83 99 116 134 152 172 193 215 238 262 287

19 .......................... 85 101 119 137 156 176 197 220 243 268 293

20 .......................... 88 104 121 140 160 180 202 224 248 273 299

(b) When n or m is greater than 20 and there are few ties, calculate an approximate critical value using the following formula

and round the result to the next larger inte-ger. Let N = n + m.

CriticalValue = 0.5 n (N 1)∗ ∗ + − ∗ ∗ +3 0902 1 12. ( ) /n m N

For example, this calculation provides a result of 295.76 for n = m = 20, and a result of 96.476 for n = m = 12. Rounding up produces approximate critical values of 296 and 97.

(c) When n or m is greater than 20 and there are many ties, calculate an approxi-mate critical value using the following for-mula and round the result to the next larger

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00302 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170 ER

23JA

02.0

04<

/GP

H>

yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

293

Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 435

integer. Let S be the sum of the squares of the ranks or average ranks of all N observa-tions. Let N = n + m.

CriticalValue = 0.5 n (N 1)∗ ∗ + − ∗3 0902. V

In the preceding formula, calculate V using

Vn m S

N N

n m N

N= ∗ ∗

∗ −− ∗ ∗ +

∗ −( )

( )

( )1

1

4 1

2

[67 FR 3408, Jan. 23, 2002]

PART 435—OIL AND GAS EXTRAC-TION POINT SOURCE CAT-EGORY

Subpart A—Offshore Subcategory

Sec. 435.10 Applicability; description of the off-

shore subcategory. 435.11 Specialized definitions. 435.12 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

435.13 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

435.14 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

435.15 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

APPENDIX 1 TO SUBPART A OF PART 435— STATIC SHEEN TEST

APPENDIX 2 TO SUBPART A OF PART 435— DRILLING FLUIDS TOXICITY TEST

APPENDIX 3 TO SUBPART A OF PART 435—PRO-CEDURE FOR MIXING BASE FLUIDS WITH SEDIMENTS

APPENDIX 4 TO SUBPART A OF PART 435—DE-TERMINATION OF BIODEGRADATION OF SYN-THETIC BASE FLUIDS IN A MARINE CLOSED BOTTLE TEST SYSTEM: SUMMARY OF MODI-FICATIONS TO ISO 11734:1995

APPENDIX 5 TO SUBPART A OF PART 435—DE-TERMINATION OF CRUDE OIL CONTAMINA-TION IN NON-AQUEOUS DRILLING FLUIDS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROM-ETRY (GC/MS)

APPENDIX 6 TO SUBPART A OF PART 435—RE-VERSE PHASE EXTRACTION (RPE) METHOD

FOR DETECTION OF OIL CONTAMINATION IN NON-AQUEOUS DRILLING FLUIDS (NAF)

APPENDIX 7 TO SUBPART A OF PART 435—API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 13B–2

APPENDIX 8 TO SUBPART A OF PART 435—REF-ERENCE C16–C18 INTERNAL OLEFIN DRILL-ING FLUID FORMULATION

Subpart B [Reserved]

Subpart C—Onshore Subcategory

435.30 Applicability; description of the on-shore subcategory.

435.31 Specialized definitions. 435.32 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best praticable control technology currently available.

Subpart D—Coastal Subcategory

435.40 Applicability; description of the coastal subcategory.

435.41 Specialized definitions. 435.42 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

435.43 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

435.44 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

435.45 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

435.46 Pretreatment standards of perform-ance for existing sources (PSES).

435.47 Pretreatment standards of perform-ance for new sources (PSNS).

APPENDIX 1 TO SUBPART D OF PART 435—PRO-CEDURE FOR DETERMINING WHEN COASTAL COOK INLET OPERATORS QUALIFY FOR AN EXEMPTION FROM THE ZERO DISCHARGE REQUIREMENT FOR EMO-CUTTINGS AND SBF-CUTTINGS IN COASTAL COOK INLET, ALASKA

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00303 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170 ER

23JA

02.0

05<

/GP

H>

ER

23JA

02.0

06<

/GP

H>

yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 434 ATTACHMENT F

455

Environmental Protection Agency § 445.1

corresponding limitation specified in § 444.16.

[65 FR 4381, Jan. 27, 2000; 65 FR 33423, May 23, 2000]

PART 445—LANDFILLS POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

Sec. 445.1 General applicability. 445.2 General definitions. 445.3 General pretreatment standards.

Subpart A—RCRA Subtitle C Hazardous Waste Landfill

445.10 Applicability. 445.11 Effluent limitations attainable by the

application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available (BPT).

445.12 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best conventional pol-lutant control technology (BCT).

445.13 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

445.14 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Subpart B—RCRA Subtitle D Non- Hazardous Waste Landfill

445.20 Applicability. 445.21 Effluent limitations attainable by the

application of best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

445.22 Effluent limitations attainable by the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

445.23 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

445.24 New source performance standards (NSPS).

AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304, 306, 307, 308, 402 and 501 of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1311, 1314, 1316, 1317, 1318, 1342 and 1361)

SOURCE: 65 FR 3048, Jan. 19, 2000, unless otherwise noted.

§ 445.1 General applicability. (a) As defined more specifically in

each subpart and except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (h) of this sec-tion, this part applies to discharges of wastewater from landfill units.

(b) The provisions of this part do not apply to wastewater discharges from land application or land treatment units, surface impoundments, under-ground injection wells, waste piles, salt dome formations, salt bed formations, underground mines or caves as these terms are defined in 40 CFR 257.2 and 260.10.

(c) The provisions of this part do not apply to wastewater generated off-site of a landfill facility, including waste-water generated off-site from washing vehicles or from waste transfer sta-tions.

(d) The provisions of this part do not apply to discharges of contaminated ground water or wastewater from re-covery pumping wells.

(e) This part does not apply to dis-charges of landfill wastewater from landfills operated in conjunction with other industrial or commercial oper-ations when the landfill only receives wastes generated by the industrial or commercial operation directly associ-ated with the landfill.

(f) This part does not apply to dis-charges of landfill wastewater from landfills operated in conjunction with other industrial or commercial oper-ations when the landfill receives wastes generated by the industrial or commercial operation directly associ-ated with the landfill and also receives other wastes provided the other wastes received for disposal are generated by a facility that is subject to the same pro-visions in 40 CFR subchapter N as the industrial or commercial operation or the other wastes received are of similar nature to the wastes generated by the industrial or commercial operation.

(g) This part does not apply to land-fills operated in conjunction with Cen-tralized Waste Treatment (CWT) facili-ties subject to 40 CFR Part 437 so long as the CWT facility commingles the landfill wastewater with other non- landfill wastewater for discharge. A landfill directly associated with a CWT facility is subject to this part if the CWT facility discharges landfill waste-water separately from other CWT wastewater or commingles the waste-water from its landfill only with waste-water from other landfills.

(h) This part does not apply to land-fills operated in conjunction with other

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00465 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 445 ATTACHMENT F

456

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 445.2

industrial or commercial operations when the landfill receives wastes from public service activities so long as the company owning the landfill does not receive a fee or other remuneration for the disposal service.

§ 445.2 General definitions. In addition to the definitions set

forth in 40 CFR 122.2, 257.2, 258.2, 264.10, 265.10, 401.11, and 403.3 the following definitions apply to this part:

(a) Contaminated ground water means water below the land surface in the zone of saturation which has been con-taminated by activities associated with waste disposal.

(b) Contaminated storm water means storm water which comes in direct con-tact with landfill wastes, the waste handling and treatment areas, or land-fill wastewater as defined in paragraph (f) of this section. Some specific areas of a landfill that may produce contami-nated storm water include (but are not limited to): the open face of an active landfill with exposed waste (no cover added); the areas around wastewater treatment operations; trucks, equip-ment or machinery that has been in di-rect contact with the waste; and waste dumping areas.

(c) Landfill directly associated with an industrial or commercial operation means:

(1) A landfill located on the same site as industrial or commercial operations; and

(2) A landfill not located on the same site as the industrial or commercial operations (off-site), but ‘‘wholly- owned’’ by the industrial or commer-cial facility and primarily dedicated to receiving waste from the related indus-trial or commercial facility.

(d) Facility means all contiguous property owned, operated, leased or under the control of the same person or entity.

(e) Landfill unit means an area of land or an excavation in which wastes are placed for permanent disposal, that is not a land application or land treat-ment unit, surface impoundment, un-derground injection well, waste pile, salt dome formation, a salt bed forma-tion, an underground mine or a cave as these terms are defined in 40 CFR 257.2, 258.2 and 264.10.

(f) Landfill wastewater means all wastewater associated with, or pro-duced by, landfilling activities except for sanitary wastewater, non-contami-nated storm water, contaminated ground water, and wastewater from re-covery pumping wells. Landfill waste-water includes, but is not limited to, leachate, gas collection condensate, drained free liquids, laboratory derived wastewater, contaminated storm water and contact washwater from washing truck, equipment, and railcar exteriors and surface areas which have come in direct contact with solid waste at the landfill facility.

(g) Non-contaminated storm water means storm water which does not come in direct contact with landfill wastes, the waste handling and treat-ment areas, or landfill wastewater that is defined in paragraph (f) of this sec-tion. Non-contaminated storm water includes storm water which flows off the cap, cover, intermediate cover, daily cover, and/or final cover of the landfill.

(h) Off-site means outside the bound-aries of a facility.

(i) On-site means within the bound-aries of a facility.

(j) Public service means the provision of landfill waste disposal services to in-dividual members of the general public, publicly-owned organizations (schools, universities, government agencies, mu-nicipalities) and not-for-profit organi-zations for which the landfill does not receive a fee or other remuneration.

(k) The regulated parameters for this part, numbered (P) and listed with ap-proved methods of analysis in Table 1B at 40 CFR 136.3, are defined as follows:

(1) Ammonia (as N) means ammonia reported as nitrogen. P4.

(2) BOD5 means 5-day biochemical ox-ygen demand. P9.

(3) Arsenic means total arsenic. P6. (4) Chromium means total chromium.

P19. (5) Zinc means total zinc. P75. (l) The regulated parameters for this

part, numbered (P) and listed with ap-proved methods of analysis in Table 1C at 40 CFR 136.3, are as follows:

(1) Naphthalene. P68. (2) Phenol. P85. (m) The regulated parameters for

this part listed with approved methods

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00466 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 445 ATTACHMENT F

457

Environmental Protection Agency § 445.20

of analysis in the attachments to Methods 625 and 1625B in Appendix A at 40 CFR Part 136 are as follows:

(1) Aniline. (2) Benzoic acid. (3) p-Cresol. (4) Pyridine. (5) a-Terpineol.

§ 445.3 General pretreatment stand-ards.

Any source subject to this part that introduces wastewater pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works (POTW) must comply with 40 CFR part 403.

Subpart A—RCRA Subtitle C Hazardous Waste Landfill

§ 445.10 Applicability. Except as provided in § 445.1, this sub-

part applies to discharges of waste-water from landfills subject to the pro-visions of 40 CFR Part 264, Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities, Subpart N–(Landfills); and 40 CFR Part 265, Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities, Subpart N–(Landfills).

§ 445.11 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions which represent the application of BPT:

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Regulated parameter Maximum daily 1

Maximum monthly avg. 1

BOD5 ...................................... 220 56 TSS ........................................ 88 27 Ammonia (as N) .................... 10 4 .9 a-Terpineol ............................ 0 .042 0 .019 Aniline .................................... 0 .024 0 .015 Benzoic acid .......................... 0 .119 0 .073 Naphthalene .......................... 0 .059 0 .022 p-Cresol ................................. 0 .024 0 .015 Phenol .................................... 0 .048 0 .029 Pyridine .................................. 0 .072 0 .025 Arsenic ................................... 1 .1 0 .54 Chromium .............................. 1 .1 0 .46 Zinc ........................................ 0 .535 0 .296

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS—Continued

Regulated parameter Maximum daily 1

Maximum monthly avg. 1

pH .......................................... (2) (2)

1 Milligrams per liter (mg/L, ppm). 2 Within the range 6 to 9.

[65 FR 3048, Jan. 19, 2000; 65 FR 14344, Mar. 16, 2000]

§ 445.12 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best con-ventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions which represent the application of BCT: Limitations for BOD5, TSS and pH are the same as the corresponding limitations specified in § 445.11.

§ 445.13 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions which represent the application of BAT: Limitations for ammonia (as N), a-terpineol, aniline, benzoic acid, naphthalene, p-cresol, phenol, pyridine, arsenic, chromium and zinc are the same as the corresponding limitations specified in § 445.11.

§ 445.14 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Any new source subject to this sub-part must achieve the following per-formance standards: Standards are the same as those specified in § 445.11.

Subpart B—RCRA Subtitle D Non- Hazardous Waste Landfill

§ 445.20 Applicability.

Except as provided in § 445.1, this sub-part applies to discharges of waste-water from landfills subject to the pro-visions of 40 CFR part 258, Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills; and 40 CFR part 257, Criteria for Classification

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00467 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 445 ATTACHMENT F

458

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 445.21

of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices.

§ 445.21 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions which represent the application of BPT:

EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

Regulated parameter Maximum daily 1

Maximum monthly avg. 1

BOD ....................................... 140 37 TSS ........................................ 88 27 Ammonia (as N) .................... 10 4 .9 a-Terpineol ............................ 0 .033 0 .016 Benzoic acid .......................... 0 .12 0 .071 p-Cresol ................................. 0 .025 0 .014 Phenol .................................... 0 .026 0 .015 Zinc ........................................ 0 .20 0 .11 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

1 Milligrams per liter (mg/L, ppm) 2 Within the range 6 to 9.

[65 FR 3048, Jan. 19, 2000; 65 FR 14344, Mar. 16, 2000]

§ 445.22 Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best con-ventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions which represent the application of BCT: Limitations for BOD5, TSS and pH are the same as the corresponding limitations specified in § 445.21.

§ 445.23 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30– 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations which represent the application of BAT: Lim-itations for ammonia (as N), a-ter-pineol, benzoic acid, p-cresol, phenol and zinc are the same as the cor-responding limitations specified in § 445.21.

§ 445.24 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Any new source subject to this sub-part must achieve the following per-formance standards: Standards are the same as those specified in § 445.21.

PART 446—PAINT FORMULATING POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

Subpart A—Oil-Base Solvent Wash Paint Subcategory

Sec. 446.10 Applicability; description of the oil-

base solvent wash paint subcategory. 446.11 Specialized definitions. 446.12 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available.

446.13 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable.

446.14 [Reserved] 446.15 Standards of performance for new

sources. 446.16 Pretreatment standards for new

sources.

AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304(b) and (c), 306(b) and (c) and 307(c), Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (the Act); 33 U.S.C. 1251, 1311, 1314(b) and (c), 1316(b) and (c) and 1317(c); 86 Stat. 816 et seq.; Pub. L. 92–500.

SOURCE: 40 FR 31725, July 28, 1975, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart A—Oil-Base Solvent Wash Paint Subcategory

§ 446.10 Applicability; description of the oil-base solvent wash paint sub-category.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to discharges resulting from the production of oil-base paint where the tank cleaning is performed using solvents. When a plant is subject to ef-fluent limitations covering more than one subcategory the discharge limita-tion shall be the aggregate of the limi-tations applicable to the total produc-tion covered in each subcategory.

§ 446.11 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations and

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00468 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 445 ATTACHMENT F

352

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 418.77

major contributing industry as defined in 40 CFR part 128 (and which would be a new source subject to section 306 of the Act, if it were to discharge pollut-ants to the navigable waters), shall be the same standard as set forth in 40 CFR part 128, for existing sources, ex-cept that, for the purpose of this sec-tion, 40 CFR 128.121, 128.122, 128.132 and 128.133 shall not apply. The following pretreatment standard establishes the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this section which may be discharged to a publicly owned treatment works by a new source subject to the provisions of this subpart:

Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard

BOD5 .............................................. No limitations. TSS ................................................. Do. pH ................................................... Do. Ammonia (as N) ............................. 30 mg/l. Nitrate (as N) .................................. Do. Total phosphorus (as P) ................. 35 mg/l.

§ 418.77 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology.

The following limitations establish the quantity or quality of pollutants or pollutant properties, which may be dis-charged by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart after ap-plication of the best conventional pol-lutant control technology: There shall be no discharge of process waste water pollutants to navigable waters.

[44 FR 50742, Aug. 29, 1979]

PART 419—PETROLEUM REFINING POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

Subpart A—Topping Subcategory

Sec. 419.10 Applicability; description of the top-

ping subcategory. 419.11 Specialized definitions. 419.12 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

419.13 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

419.14 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

419.15 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

419.16 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

419.17 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Subpart B—Cracking Subcategory

419.20 Applicability; description of the cracking subcategory.

419.21 Specialized definitions. 419.22 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

419.23 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

419.24 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

419.25 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

419.26 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

419.27 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Subpart C—Petrochemical Subcategory

419.30 Applicability; description of the pe-trochemical subcategory.

419.31 Specialized definitions. 419.32 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available.

419.33 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

419.34 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

419.35 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

419.36 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

419.37 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00362 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

353

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.11

Subpart D—Lube Subcategory

419.40 Applicability; description of the lube subcategory.

419.41 Specialized definitions. 419.42 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

419.43 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

419.44 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

419.45 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

419.46 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

419.47 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Subpart E—Integrated Subcategory

419.50 Applicability; description of the inte-grated subcategory.

419.51 Specialized definitions. 419.52 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

419.53 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

419.54 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (BCT).

419.55 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

419.56 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

419.57 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

APPENDIX A TO PART 419—PROCESSES IN-CLUDED IN THE DETERMINATION OF BAT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS FOR TOTAL CHRO-MIUM, HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM, AND PHE-NOLIC COMPOUNDS (4AAP)

AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b), (c), (e), and (g), 306 (b) and (c), 307 (b) and (c), and 501 of the Clean Water Act (the Federal Water Pol-lution Control Act Amendments of 1972 as amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977) (the ‘‘Act’’); 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1314 (b), (c), (e), and (g), 1316 (b) and (c), 1317 (b) and (c), and 1361; 86 Stat. 816, Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567, Pub. L. 95–217.

SOURCE: 47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart A—Topping Subcategory

§ 419.10 Applicability; description of the topping subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart apply to discharges from any facility that produces petroleum products by the use of topping and catalytic reforming, whether or not the facility includes any other process in addition to top-ping and catalytic reforming. The pro-visions of this subpart do not apply to facilities that include thermal proc-esses (coking, vis-breaking, etc.) or catalytic cracking.

§ 419.11 Specialized definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart: (a) Except as provided below, the gen-

eral definitions, abbreviations, and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.

(b) The term runoff shall mean the flow of storm water resulting from pre-cipitation coming into contact with pe-troleum refinery property.

(c) The term ballast shall mean the flow of waters, from a ship, that is treated along with refinery wastewaters in the main treatment system.

(d) The term feedstock shall mean the crude oil and natural gas liquids fed to the topping units.

(e) The term once-through cooling water shall mean those waters dis-charged that are used for the purpose of heat removal and that do not come into direct contact with any raw mate-rial, intermediate, or finished product.

(f) The following abbreviations shall be used: (1) Mgal means one thousand gallons; (2) Mbbl means one thousand barrels (one barrel is equivalent to 42 gallons).

(g) The term contaminated runoff shall mean runoff which comes into contact with any raw material, inter-mediate product, finished product, by- product or waste product located on pe-troleum refinery property.

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28522, July 12, 1985]

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00363 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

354

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.12

§ 419.12 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT Effluent Limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock)

BOD5 ..................................... 22 .7 12 .0 TSS ........................................ 15 .8 10 .1 COD 1 ..................................... 117 .0 60 .3 Oil and grease ....................... 6 .9 3 .7 Phenolic compounds ............. 0 .168 0 .076 Ammonia as N ....................... 2 .81 1 .27 Sulfide .................................... 0 .149 0 .068 Total chromium ...................... 0 .345 0 .20 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .028 0 .012 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

BOD5 ..................................... 8 .0 4 .25 TSS ........................................ 5 .6 3 .6 COD 1 ..................................... 41 .2 21 .3 Oil and grease ....................... 2 .5 1 .3 Phenolic compounds ............. 0 .060 0 .027 Ammonia as N ....................... 0 .99 0 .45 Sulfide .................................... 0 .053 0 .024 Total chromium ...................... 0 .122 0 .071 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .01 0 .0044 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d). 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size fac-tor

Less than 24.9 ....................................................... 1.02 25.0 to 49.9 ........................................................... 1.06 50.0 to 74.9 ........................................................... 1.16 75.0 to 99.9 ........................................................... 1.26 100 to 124.9 .......................................................... 1.38 125.0 to 149.9 ....................................................... 1.50 150.0 or greater ..................................................... 1.57

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process factor

Less than 2.49 ....................................................... 0.62 2.5 to 3.49 ............................................................. 0.67 3.5 to 4.49 ............................................................. 0.80 4.5 to 5.49 ............................................................. 0.95 5.5 to 5.99 ............................................................. 1.07 6.0 to 6.49 ............................................................. 1.17 6.5 to 6.99 ............................................................. 1.27 7.0 to 7.49 ............................................................. 1.39 7.5 to 7.99 ............................................................. 1.51 8.0 to 8.49 ............................................................. 1.64 8.5 to 8.99 ............................................................. 1.79 9.0 to 9.49 ............................................................. 1.95 9.5 to 9.99 ............................................................. 2.12 10.0 to 10.49 ......................................................... 2.31 10.5 to 10.99 ......................................................... 2.51 11.0 to 11.49 ......................................................... 2.73 11.5 to 11.99 ......................................................... 2.98 12.0 to 12.49 ......................................................... 3.24 12.5 to 12.99 ......................................................... 3.53 13.0 to 13.49 ......................................................... 3.84 13.5 to 13.99 ......................................................... 4.18 14.0 or greater ....................................................... 4.36

(3) See the comprehensive example Subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c) The following allocations con-stitute the quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph and attrib-utable to ballast, which may be dis-charged after the application of best practicable control technology cur-rently available, by a point source sub-ject to this subpart, in addition to the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. The allocation allowed for ballast water flow, as kg/cu m (lb/M gal), shall be based on those ballast wa-ters treated at the refinery.

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations for ballast water

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per cubic meter of flow)

BOD5 ............................................. 0 .048 0 .026 TSS ................................................ 0 .033 0 .021 COD 1 ............................................. 0 .47 0 .24 Oil and grease ............................... 0 .015 0 .008 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 gal of flow)

BOD5 ............................................. 0 .40 0 .21 TSS ................................................ 0 .26 0 .17 COD 1 ............................................. 3 .9 2 .0 Oil and grease ............................... 0 .126 0 .067

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00364 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

355

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.13

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations for ballast water

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

pH .................................................. (2) (2)

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d). 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(e) Effluent limitations for contami-nated runoff. The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated run-off, which may be discharged after the application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease and 110 mg/l total organic carbon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease or 110 mg/ l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as determined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 48 . 26 . TSS ........................................ 33 . 21 . COD 1 ..................................... 360 . 180 . Oil and grease ....................... 15 . 8 . Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .35 0 .17 Total chromium ...................... 0 .73 0 .43 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .062 0 .028 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 0 .40 0 .22 TSS ........................................ 0 .28 0 .18 COD 1 ..................................... 3 .0 1 .5 Oil and grease ....................... 0 .13 0 .067 Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .0029 0 .0014 Total chromium ...................... 0 .0060 0 .0035 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .00052 0 .00023 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the permitting authority may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgment of the permitting authority, adequate correlation data are not available, the ef-fluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5.

2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28522, 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.13 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT):

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00365 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

356

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.13

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock)

COD 1 ..................................... 117 60 .3 Ammonia as N ....................... 2 .81 1 .27 Sulfide .................................... 0 .149 0 .068

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

COD 1 ..................................... 41 .2 21 .3 Ammonia as N ....................... 0 .99 0 .45 Sulfide .................................... 0 .053 0 .024

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d).

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size fac-tor

Less than 24.9 ....................................................... 1.02 25.0 to 49.9 ........................................................... 1.06 50.0 to 74.9 ........................................................... 1.16 75.0 to 99.9 ........................................................... 1.26 100 to 124.9 .......................................................... 1.38 125.0 to 149.9 ....................................................... 1.50 150.0 or greater ..................................................... 1.57

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process factor

Less than 2.49 ....................................................... 0.62 2.5 to 3.49 ............................................................. 0.67 3.5 to 4.49 ............................................................. 0.80 4.5 to 5.49 ............................................................. 0.95 5.5 to 5.99 ............................................................. 1.07 6.0 to 6.49 ............................................................. 1.17 6.5 to 6.99 ............................................................. 1.27 7.0 to 7.49 ............................................................. 1.39 7.5 to 7.99 ............................................................. 1.51 8.0 to 8.49 ............................................................. 1.64 8.5 to 9.99 ............................................................. 1.79 9.0 to 9.49 ............................................................. 1.95 9.5 to 9.99 ............................................................. 2.12 10.0 to 10.49 ......................................................... 2.31 10.5 to 10.99 ......................................................... 2.51 11.0 to 11.49 ......................................................... 2.73 11.5 to 11.99 ......................................................... 2.98 12.0 to 12.49 ......................................................... 3.24 12.5 to 12.99 ......................................................... 3.53 13.0 to 13.49 ......................................................... 3.84 13.5 to 13.99 ......................................................... 4.18 14.0 or greater ....................................................... 4.36

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c)(1) In addition to the provisions contained above pertaining to COD, ammonia and sulfide, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT):

(i) For each of the regulated pollut-ant parameters listed below, the efflu-ent limitation for a given refinery is the sum of the products of each efflu-ent limitation factor times the applica-ble process feedstock rate, calculated as provided in 40 CFR 122.45(b). Appli-cable production processes are pre-sented in appendix A, by process type. The process identification numbers presented in this appendix A are for the convenience of the reader. They can be cross-referenced in the Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guide-lines, New Source Performance Standards, and Pretreatment Standards for the Pe-troleum Refining Point Source Category (EPA 440/1–82/014), Table III–7, pp. 49–54.

Pollutant or pollutant property and process type

BAT effluent limitation factor

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 cubic meters of feed-stock)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP): Crude .............................. 0 .037 0 .009 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .419 0 .102 Asphalt ............................ 0 .226 0 .055 Lube ............................... 1 .055 0 .257 Reforming and alkylation 0 .377 0 .092

Total chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .030 0 .011 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .340 0 .118 Asphalt ............................ 0 .183 0 .064 Lube ............................... 0 .855 0 .297 Reforming and alkylation 0 .305 0 .106

Hexavalent chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .0019 0 .0009 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .0218 0 .0098 Asphalt ............................ 0 .0117 0 .0053 Lube ............................... 0 .0549 0 .0248 Reforming and alkylation 0 .0196 0 .0088

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP): Crude .............................. 0 .013 0 .003 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .147 0 .036 Asphalt ............................ 0 .079 0 .019 Lube ............................... 0 .369 0 .090 Reforming and alkylation 0 .132 0 .032

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00366 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

357

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.13

Pollutant or pollutant property and process type

BAT effluent limitation factor

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Total chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .011 0 .004 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .119 0 .041 Asphalt ............................ 0 .064 0 .022 Lube ............................... 0 .299 0 .104 Reforming and alkylation 0 .107 0 .037

Hexavalent chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .0007 0 .0003 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .0076 0 .0034 Asphalt ............................ 0 .0041 0 .0019 Lube ............................... 0 .0192 0 .0087 Reforming and alkylation 0 .0069 0 .0031

(2) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.43(c)(2).

(d) The following allocations con-stitute the quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to ballast, which may be discharged after the application of best available technology economically achievable by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart. These allocations are in addition to the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. The allo-cation allowed for ballast water flow, as kg/cu m (lb/M gal), shall be based on those ballast waters treated at the re-finery.

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations for ballast water

Maximum for any 1

day

Average or daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per cubic meter of flow)

COD 1 ............................................. 0 .47 0 .24

English units (pounds per 1,000 gal of flow)

COD 1 ............................................. 3 .9 2 .0

1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the Regional Administrator may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD Effluent limitations for TOC shall be based on effluent data from the plant correlating TOC to BOD5.

If in the judgment of the Regional Administrator, adequate correlation data are not available, the effluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applica-ble effluent limitations on BOD5.

(e) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable

to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(f) Effluent limitations for contaminated runoff. The following effluent limita-tions constitute the quantity and qual-ity of pollutants or pollutant prop-erties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated runoff, which may be discharged after the ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 110 mg/l total organic car-bon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 110 mg/l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged shall not exceed the quan-tity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as deter-mined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .35 0 .17 Total chromium ...................... 0 .60 0 .21 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .062 0 .028 COD 1 ..................................... 360 . 180 .

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .0029 0 .0014 Total chromium ...................... 0 .0050 0 .0018 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .00052 0 .00023

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00367 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

358

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.14

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

COD 1 ..................................... 3 .0 1 .5

1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the permitting authority may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgement of the permitting authority, adequate correlation data are not available, the ef-fluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.14 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT).

(a) Any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the fol-lowing effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology (BCT).

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (Kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock)

BOD5 ....................................... 22.7 12 .0 TSS .......................................... 15.8 10 .1 Oil and Grease ........................ 6.9 3 .7 pH ............................................ (1) (1)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

BOD5 ....................................... 8.0 4 .25 TSS .......................................... 5.6 3 .6 Oil and Grease ........................ 2.5 1 .3 PH ............................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 24.9 ................................................... 1.02 25.0 to 49.9 ....................................................... 1.06 50.0 to 74.9 ....................................................... 1.16 75.0 to 99.9 ....................................................... 1.26 100 to 124.9 ...................................................... 1.38 125.0 to 149.9 ................................................... 1.50 150.0 or greater ................................................. 1.57

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process fac-tor

Less than 2.49 ................................................... 0.62 2.5 to 3.49 ......................................................... 0.67 3.5 to 4.49 ......................................................... 0.80 4.5 to 5.49 ......................................................... 0.95 5.5 to 5.99 ......................................................... 1.07 6.0 to 6.49 ......................................................... 1.17 6.5 to 6.99 ......................................................... 1.27 7.0 to 7.49 ......................................................... 1.39 7.5 to 7.99 ......................................................... 1.51 8.0 to 8.49 ......................................................... 1.64 8.5 to 8.99 ......................................................... 1.79 9.0 to 9.49 ......................................................... 1.95 9.5 to 9.99 ......................................................... 2.12 10.0 to 10.49 ..................................................... 2.31 10.5 to 10.99 ..................................................... 2.51 11.0 to 11.49 ..................................................... 2.73 11.5 to 11.99 ..................................................... 2.98 12.0 to 12.49 ..................................................... 3.24 12.5 to 12.99 ..................................................... 3.53 13.0 to 13.49 ..................................................... 3.84 13.5 to 13.99 ..................................................... 4.18 14.0 or greater ................................................... 4.36

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.43(b)(3).

(c) The following allocations con-stitute the quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph and attrib-utable to ballast, which may be dis-charged after the application of best conventional pollutant control tech-nology by a point source subject to this subpart, in addition to the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this sec-tion. The allocation allowed for ballast water flow, as kg/cu m (lb/1000 gal), shall be based on those ballast waters treated at the refinery.

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT Effluent limitations for ballast water

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per m3 of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 0 .048 0 .026 TSS ........................................ 0 .033 0 .021 Oil and grease ....................... 0 .015 0 .008 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00368 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

359

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.16

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT Effluent limitations for ballast water

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

English units (pounds per 1000 gallons of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 0 .40 0 .21 TSS ........................................ 0 .26 0 .17 Oil and grease ....................... 0 .126 0 .067 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section.

(e) Effluent limitations for contami-nated runoff. The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated run-off which may be discharged after the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease is not com-mingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollut-ants discharged shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as de-termined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the fol-lowing table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 (m3 of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 48 . 26 . TSS ........................................ 33 . 21 . Oil and grease ....................... 15 . 8 . pH .......................................... (1) (1)

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 0 .40 0 .22 TSS ........................................ 0 .28 0 .18 Oil and grease ....................... 0 .13 0 .067 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

[50 FR 28524, July 12, 1985]

§ 419.15 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 and 403.13 any existing source subject to this subpart which introduces pol-lutants into a publicly owned treat-ment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES). The following stand-ards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW:

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for existing

sources maximum for

any 1 day

(Milligrams per liter (mg/

l))

Oil and Grease ................................................. 100 Ammonia (as N) ................................................ 1 100

1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-nia set forth in § 419.13 (a) and (b).

§ 419.16 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

(a) Any new source subject to this subpart must achieve the following new source performance standards (NSPS):

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00369 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

360

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.16

Pollutant or pollutant property

NSPS effluent limita-tions

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per cubic meter of flow)

BOD5 ............................................. 11 .8 6 .3 TSS ................................................ 8 .3 4 .9 COD 1 ............................................. 61 .0 32 Oil and grease ............................... 3 .6 1 .9 Phenolic compounds ..................... 0 .088 0 .043 Ammonia as N ............................... 2 .8 1 .3 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .078 0 .035 Total chromium .............................. 0 .18 0 .105 Hexavalent chromium .................... 0 .015 0 .0068 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 gal of flow)

BOD5 ............................................. 4 .2 2 .2 TSS ................................................ 3 .0 1 .9 COD 1 ............................................. 21 .7 11 .2 Oil and grease ............................... 1 .3 0 .70 Phenolic compounds ..................... 0 .031 0 .016 Ammonia as N ............................... 1 .0 0 .45 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .027 0 .012 Total chromium .............................. 0 .064 0 .037 Hexavalent chromium .................... 0 .0052 0 .0025 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d). 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 24.9 ..................................................... 1 .02 25.0 to 49.9 ......................................................... 1 .06 50.0 to 74.9 ......................................................... 1 .16 75.0 to 99.9 ......................................................... 1 .26 100 to 124.9 ........................................................ 1 .38 125.0 to 149.9 ..................................................... 1 .50 150.0 or greater ................................................... 1 .57

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process factor

Less than 2.49 ..................................................... 0 .62 2.5 to 3.49 ........................................................... 0 .67 3.5 to 4.49 ........................................................... 0 .80 4.5 to 5.49 ........................................................... 0 .95 5.5 to 5.99 ........................................................... 1 .07 6.0 to 6.49 ........................................................... 1 .17 6.5 to 6.99 ........................................................... 1 .27 7.0 to 7.49 ........................................................... 1 .39 7.5 to 7.99 ........................................................... 1 .51 8.0 to 8.49 ........................................................... 1 .64 8.5 to 9.99 ........................................................... 1 .79

Process configuration Process factor

9.0 to 9.49 ........................................................... 1 .95 9.5 to 9.99 ........................................................... 2 .12 10.0 to 10.49 ....................................................... 2 .31 10.5 to 10.99 ....................................................... 2 .51 11.0 to 11.49 ....................................................... 2 .73 11.5 to 11.99 ....................................................... 2 .98 12.0 to 12.49 ....................................................... 3 .24 12.5 to 12.99 ....................................................... 3 .53 13.0 to 13.49 ....................................................... 3 .84 13.5 to 13.99 ....................................................... 4 .18 14.0 or greater ..................................................... 4 .36

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c) The following allocations con-stitute the quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph and attrib-utable to ballast, which may be dis-charged after the application of best practicable control technology cur-rently available, by a point source sub-ject to this subpart, in addition to the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. The allocation allowed for ballast water flow, as kg/cu m (lb/ Mgal), shall be based on those ballast waters treated at the refinery.

Pollutant or pollutant property

NSPS Effluent Limita-tions for Ballast Water

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per cubic meter of flow)

BOD5 ............................................. 0 .048 0 .026 TSS ................................................ 0 .033 0 .021 COD 1 ............................................. 0 .47 0 .24 Oil and grease ............................... 0 .015 0 .008 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 gal of flow)

BOD5 ............................................. 0 .40 0 .21 TSS ................................................ 0 .27 0 .17 COD 1 ............................................. 3 .9 2 .0 Oil and grease ............................... 0 .126 0 .067 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d). 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once-

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00370 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

361

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.22

through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(e) Effluent limitations for runoff. [Re-served]

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.17 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7, any new source subject to this subpart which introduces pollutants into a pub-licly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

(a) The following standards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW:

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for new

sources— maximum for

any 1 day

Milligrams per liter (mg/

1)

Oil and grease .................................................. 100 Ammonia (as N) ................................................ 1 100

1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-nia set forth in § 419.16 (a) and (b).

(b) The following standard is applied to the cooling tower discharge part of the total refinery flow to the POTW by multiplying: (1) The standard; (2) by the total refinery flow to the POTW; and (3) by the ratio of the cooling tower discharge flow to the total refin-ery flow.

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for new

sources— maximum for

any 1 day

Milligrams per liter (mg/

1)

Total chromium ................................................. 1

Subpart B—Cracking Subcategory

§ 419.20 Applicability; description of the cracking subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to all discharges from any fa-cility that produces petroleum prod-ucts by the use of topping and crack-ing, whether or not the facility in-cludes any process in addition to top-ping and cracking. The provisions of this subpart are not applicable, how-ever, to facilities that include the proc-esses specified in subparts C, D, or E of this part.

§ 419.21 Specialized definitions. The general definitions, abbrevia-

tions and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter and the spe-cialized definitions set forth in § 419.11 shall apply to this subpart.

§ 419.22 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feed-stock)

BOD5 ............................................. 28 .2 15 .6 TSS ................................................ 19 .5 12 .6 COD1 ............................................. 210 .0 109 Oil and grease ............................... 8 .4 4 .5 Phenolic compounds ..................... 0 .21 0 .10 Ammonia as N ............................... 18 .8 8 .5 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .18 0 .082 Total chromium .............................. 0 .43 0 .25 Hexavalent chromium .................... 0 .035 0 .016 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl feedstock)

BOD5 ............................................. 9 .9 5 .5

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00371 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

362

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.22

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

TSS ................................................ 6 .9 4 .4 COD1 ............................................. 74 .0 38 .4 Oil and grease ............................... 3 .0 1 .6 Phenolic compounds ..................... 0 .074 0 .036 Ammonia as N ............................... 6 .6 3 .0 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .065 0 .029 Total chromium .............................. 0 .15 0 .088 Hexavalent chromium .................... 0 .012 0 .0056 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d). 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 24.9 ................................................. 0 .91 25.0 to 49.9 ..................................................... 0 .95 50.0 to 74.9 ..................................................... 1 .04 75.0 to 99.9 ..................................................... 1 .13 100.0 to 124.9 ................................................. 1 .23 125.0 to 149.9 ................................................. 1 .35 150.0 or greater ............................................... 1 .41

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process fac-tor

Less than 2.49 ................................................. 0 .58 2.5 to 3.49 ....................................................... 0 .63 3.5 to 4.49 ....................................................... 0 .74 4.5 to 5.49 ....................................................... 0 .88 5.5 to 5.99 ....................................................... 1 .00 6.0 to 6.49 ....................................................... 1 .09 6.5 to 6.99 ....................................................... 1 .19 7.0 to 7.49 ....................................................... 1 .29 7.5 to 7.99 ....................................................... 1 .41 8.0 to 8.49 ....................................................... 1 .53 8.5 to 8.99 ....................................................... 1 .67 9.0 to 9.49 ....................................................... 1 .82 9.5 or greater ................................................... 1 .89

(3) See the comprehensive example subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c) The provisions of § 419.12(c) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by

paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(e) Effluent limitations for contami-nated runoff. The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated run-off, which may be discharged after the application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease and 110 mg/l total organic carbon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease or 110 mg/ l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as determined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 48 . 26 . TSS ........................................ 33 . 21 . COD 1 ..................................... 360 . 180 . Oil and grease ....................... 15 . 8 . Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .35 0 .17 Total chromium ...................... 0 .73 0 .43 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .062 0 .028 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 0 .40 0 .22 TSS ........................................ 0 .28 0 .18 COD 1 ..................................... 3 .0 1 .5 Oil and grease ....................... 0 .13 0 .067 Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .0029 0 .0014 Total chromium ...................... 0 .0060 0 .0035 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .00052 0 .00023

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00372 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

363

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.23

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

pH .......................................... (2) (2)

1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the permitting authority may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgment of the permitting authority, adequate correlation data are not available, the ef-fluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5.

2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28522, 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.23 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best available technology economically achievable:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feed-stock)

COD 1 ............................................. 210 109 Ammonia as N ............................... 18 .8 8 .5 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .18 0 .082

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feed-stock)

COD 1 ............................................. 74 .0 38 .4 Ammonia as N ............................... 6 .6 3 .0 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .065 0 .029

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d).

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and

maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size fac-tor

Less than 24.9 ....................................................... 0.91 25.0 to 49.9 ........................................................... 0.95 50.0 to 74.9 ........................................................... 1.04 75.0 to 99.9 ........................................................... 1.13 100.0 to 124.9 ....................................................... 1.23 125.0 to 149.9 ....................................................... 1.35 150.0 or greater ..................................................... 1.41

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process factor

Less than 2.49 ....................................................... 0.58 2.5 to 3.49 ............................................................. 0.63 3.5 to 4.49 ............................................................. 0.74 4.5 to 5.49 ............................................................. 0.88 5.5 to 5.99 ............................................................. 1.00 6.0 to 6.49 ............................................................. 1.09 6.5 to 6.99 ............................................................. 1.19 7.0 to 7.49 ............................................................. 1.29 7.5 to 7.99 ............................................................. 1.41 8.0 to 8.49 ............................................................. 1.53 8.5 to 8.99 ............................................................. 1.67 9.0 to 9.49 ............................................................. 1.82 9.5 or greater ......................................................... 1.89

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c)(1) In addition to the provisions contained above pertaining to COD, ammonia and sulfide, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT):

(i) For each of the regulated pollut-ant parameters listed below, the efflu-ent limitation for a given refinery is the sum of the products of each efflu-ent limitation factor times the applica-ble process feedstock rate, calculated as provided in 40 CFR 122.45(b). Appli-cable production processes are pre-sented in appendix A, by process type. The process identification numbers presented in this appendix A are for the convenience of the reader. They can be cross-referenced in the Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guide-lines, New Source Performance Standards, and Pretreatment Standards for the Pe-troleum Refining Point Source Category (EPA 440/1–82/014), Table III–7, pp. 49–54.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00373 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

364

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.23

Pollutant or pollutant property and process type

BAT effluent limitation factor

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 cubic meters of feed-stock)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP): Crude .............................. 0 .037 0 .009 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .419 0 .102 Asphalt ............................ 0 .226 0 .055 Lube ............................... 1 .055 0 .257 Reforming and alkylation 0 .377 0 .092

Total chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .030 0 .011 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .340 0 .118 Asphalt ............................ 0 .183 0 .064 Lube ............................... 0 .855 0 .297 Reforming and alkylation 0 .305 0 .106

Hexavalent chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .0019 0 .0009 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .0218 0 .0098 Asphalt ............................ 0 .0117 0 .0053 Lube ............................... 0 .0549 0 .0248 Reforming and alkylation 0 .0196 0 .0088

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP): Crude .............................. 0 .013 0 .003 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .147 0 .036 Asphalt ............................ 0 .079 0 .019 Lube ............................... 0 .369 0 .090 Reforming and alkylation 0 .132 0 .032

Total chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .011 0 .004 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .119 0 .041 Asphalt ............................ 0 .064 0 .022 Lube ............................... 0 .299 0 .104 Reforming and alkylation 0 .107 0 .037

Hexavalent chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .0007 0 .0003 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .0076 0 .0034 Asphalt ............................ 0 .0041 0 .0019 Lube ............................... 0 .0192 0 .0087 Reforming and alkylation 0 .0069 0 .0031

(2) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.43(c)(2).

(d) The provisions of § 419.13(d) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(e) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(f) Effluent limitations for contaminated runoff. The following effluent limita-

tions constitute the quantity and qual-ity of pollutants or pollutant prop-erties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated runoff, which may be discharged after the ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 110 mg/l total organic car-bon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 110 mg/l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged shall not exceed the quan-tity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as deter-mined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .35 0 .17 Total chromium ...................... 0 .60 0 .21 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .062 0 .028 COD 1 ..................................... 360 . 180 .

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .0029 0 .0014 Total chromium ...................... 0 .0050 0 .0018 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .00052 0 .00023 COD 1 ..................................... 3 .0 1 .5

1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the permitting authority may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgement of the permitting authority, adequate correlation data are not available, the ef-fluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00374 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

365

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.24

§ 419.24 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT).

(a) Any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the fol-lowing effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology (BCT):

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 (m3 of feedstock)

BOD5 ......................................... 28.2 15.6 TSS ............................................ 19.5 12.6 Oil and grease ........................... 8.4 4.5 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

BOD5 ......................................... 9.9 5.5 TSS ............................................ 6.9 4.4 Oil and grease ........................... 3.0 1.6 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 24.9 ................................................... 0.91 25.0 to 49.9 ....................................................... 0.95 50.0 to 74.9 ....................................................... 1.04 75.0 to 99.9 ....................................................... 1.13 100.0 to 124.9 ................................................... 1.23 125.0 to 149.9 ................................................... 1.35 150.0 or greater ................................................. 1.41

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process fac-tor

Less than 2.49 ................................................... 0.58 2.5 to 3.49 ......................................................... 0.63 3.5 to 4.49 ......................................................... 0.74 4.5 to 5.49 ......................................................... 0.88 5.5 to 5.99 ......................................................... 1.00 6.0 to 6.49 ......................................................... 1.09 6.5 to 6.99 ......................................................... 1.19 7.0 to 7.49 ......................................................... 1.29 7.5 to 7.99 ......................................................... 1.41 8.0 to 8.49 ......................................................... 1.53

Process configuration Process fac-tor

8.5 to 8.99 ......................................................... 1.67 9.0 to 9.49 ......................................................... 1.82 9.5 or greater ..................................................... 1.89

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c) The provisions of § 419.14(c) apply to discharge of process wastewater pol-lutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provi-sions of this subpart.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section.

(e) Effluent limitations for contami-nated runoff. The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated run-off which may be discharged after the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease is not com-mingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollut-ants discharged shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as de-termined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the fol-lowing table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 48 26

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00375 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

366

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.25

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

TSS ........................................ 33 21 Oil and grease ....................... 15 8 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 0 .40 0 .22 TSS ........................................ 0 .28 0 .18 Oil and grease ....................... 0 .13 0 .067 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

[50 FR 28525, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.25 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 and 403.13 any existing source subject to this subpart which introduces pol-lutants into a publicly owned treat-ment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES). The following stand-ards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW:

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for new

sources— maximum for

any 1 day

Milligrams per liter (mg/

l)

Oil and grease .................................................. 100 Ammonia ........................................................... 1 100

1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-nia set forth in § 419.23 (a) and (b).

§ 419.26 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

(a) Any new source subject to this subpart must achieve the following new source performance standards (NSPS):

Pollutant or pollutant property

NSPS effluent limita-tions

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feed-stock)

BOD5 ............................................. 16 .3 8 .7 TSS ................................................ 11 .3 7 .2 COD 1 ............................................. 118 .0 61 oil and grease ................................ 4 .8 2 .6 Phenolic compounds ..................... 0 .119 0 .058 Ammonia (as N) ............................ 18 .8 8 .6 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .105 0 .048 Total chromium .............................. 0 .24 0 .14 Hexavalent chromium .................... 0 .020 0 .0088 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feed-stock)

BOD5 ............................................. 5 .8 3 .1 TSS ................................................ 4 .0 2 .5 COD 1 ............................................. 41 .5 21 Oil and grease ............................... 1 .7 0 .93 Phenolic compounds ..................... 0 .042 0 .020 Ammonia (as N) ............................ 6 .6 3 .0 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .037 0 .017 Total chromium .............................. 0 .084 0 .049 Hexavalent chromium .................... 0 .0072 0 .0032 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d). 2 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any 1 day and max-imum average of daily values for 30 consecutive days.

(1) Size Factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size fac-tor

Less than 24.9 ....................................................... 0.91 25.0 to 49.9 ........................................................... 0.95 50.0 to 74.9 ........................................................... 1.04 75.0 to 99.9 ........................................................... 1.13 100.0 to 124.9 ....................................................... 1.23 125.0 to 149.9 ....................................................... 1.35 150.0 or greater ..................................................... 1.41

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process factor

Less than 2.49 ....................................................... 0.58 2.5 to 3.49 ............................................................. 0.63 3.5 to 4.49 ............................................................. 0.74 4.5 to 5.49 ............................................................. 0.88 5.5 to 5.99 ............................................................. 1.00 6.0 to 6.49 ............................................................. 1.09 6.5 to 6.99 ............................................................. 1.19 7.0 to 7.49 ............................................................. 1.29

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00376 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

367

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.32

Process configuration Process factor

7.5 to 7.99 ............................................................. 1.41 8.0 to 8.49 ............................................................. 1.53 8.5 to 8.99 ............................................................. 1.67 9.0 to 9.49 ............................................................. 1.82 9.5 or greater ......................................................... 1.89

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c) The provisions of § 419.16(c) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(e) Effluent limitation for runoff. [Re-served]

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.27 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7, any new source subject to this subpart which introduces pollutants into a pub-licly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

(a) The following standards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW.

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for new

sources— maximum for

any 1 day

Milligrams per liter (mg/

l)

Oil and grease .................................................. 100 Ammonia (as N) ................................................ 1 100

1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-nia set forth in § 419.26(a) and (b).

(b) The following standard is applied to the cooling tower discharge part of the total refinery flow to the POTW by multiplying: (1) The standard; (2) by

the total refinery flow to the POTW; and (3) by the ratio of the cooling tower discharge flow to the total refin-ery flow.

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for new

sources— maximum for

any 1 day

Milligrams per liter (mg/

l)

Total chromium ................................................. 1

Subpart C—Petrochemical Subcategory

§ 419.30 Applicability; description of the petrochemical subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to all discharges from any fa-cility that produces petroleum prod-ucts by the use of topping, cracking, and petrochemical operations whether or not the facility includes any process in addition to topping, cracking, and petrochemical operations. The provi-sions of this subpart shall not be appli-cable, however, to facilities that in-clude the processes specified in subpart D or E of this part.

§ 419.31 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart: (a) The general definitions, abbrevia-

tions, and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter and the spe-cialized definitions set forth in § 419.11 shall apply.

(b) The term petrochemical operations shall mean the production of second- generation petrochemicals (i.e., alco-hols, ketones, cumene, styrene, etc.) or first generation petrochemicals and isomerization products (i.e., BTX, olefins, cyclohexane, etc.) when 15 per-cent or more of refinery production is as first-generation petrochemicals and isomerization products.

§ 419.32 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available.

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00377 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

368

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.32

achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feed-stock)

BOD5 ............................................. 34 .6 18 .4 TSS ................................................ 23 .4 14 .8 COD1 ............................................. 210 .0 109 .0 Oil and grease ............................... 11 .1 5 .9 Phenolic compound ....................... 0 .25 0 .120 Ammonia as N ............................... 23 .4 10 .6 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .22 0 .099 Total chromium .............................. 0 .52 0 .30 Hexavalent chromium .................... 0 .046 0 .020 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feed-stock)

BOD5 ............................................. 12 .1 6 .5 TSS ................................................ 8 .3 5 .25 COD1 ............................................. 74 .0 38 .4 Oil and grease ............................... 3 .9 2 .1 Phenolic compounds ..................... 0 .088 0 .0425 Ammonia as N ............................... 8 .25 3 .8 Sufide ............................................ 0 .078 0 .035 Total chromium .............................. 0 .183 0 .107 Hexavalent chromium .................... 0 .016 0 .0072 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d). 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 barrels of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 24.9 ........................................................... 0.73 25.0 to 49.9 ............................................................... 0.76 50.0 to 74.9 ............................................................... 0.83 75.0 to 99.9 ............................................................... 0.91 100.0 to 124.9 ........................................................... 0.99 125.0 to 149.9 ........................................................... 1.08 150.0 or greater ......................................................... 1.13

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Proc-ess

factor

Less than 4.49 ........................................................... 0.73

Process configuration Proc-ess

factor

4.5 to 5.49 ................................................................. 0.80 5.5 to 5.99 ................................................................. 0.91 6.0 to 6.49 ................................................................. 0.99 6.5 to 6.99 ................................................................. 1.08 7.0 to 7.49 ................................................................. 1.17 7.5 to 7.99 ................................................................. 1.28 8.0 to 8.49 ................................................................. 1.39 8.5 to 8.99 ................................................................. 1.51 9.0 to 9.49 ................................................................. 1.65 9.5 or greater ............................................................. 1.72

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c) The provisions of § 419.12(c) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(e) Effluent limitations for contami-nated runoff. The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated run-off, which may be discharged after the application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease and 110 mg/l total organic carbon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease or 110 mg/ l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as determined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the following table:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00378 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

369

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.33

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 48 . 26 . TSS ........................................ 33 . 21 . COD 1 ..................................... 360 . 180 . Oil and grease ....................... 15 . 8 . Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .35 0 .17 Total chromium ...................... 0 .73 0 .43 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .062 0 .028 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 0 .40 0 .22 TSS ........................................ 0 .28 0 .18 COD 1 ..................................... 3 .0 1 .5 Oil and grease ....................... 0 .13 0 .067 Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .0029 0 .0014 Total chromium ...................... 0 .0060 0 .0035 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .00052 0 .00023 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the permitting authority may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgment of the permitting authority, adequate correlation data are not available, the ef-fluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5.

2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28522, 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.33 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best available techology economically achievable (BAT):

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT Effluent Limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock)

COD 1 ..................................... 210 .0 109 .0 Ammonia as N ....................... 23 .4 10 .6 Sulfide .................................... 0 .22 0 .099

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

COD 1 ..................................... 74 .0 38 .4 Ammonia as N ....................... 8 .25 3 .8 Sulfide .................................... 0 .078 0 .035

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d).

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 24.9 ........................................................... 0.73 25.0 to 49.9 ............................................................... 0.76 50.0 to 74.9 ............................................................... 0.83 75.0 to 99.9 ............................................................... 0.91 100.0 to 124.9 ........................................................... 0.99 125.0 to 149.9 ........................................................... 1.08 150.0 or greater ......................................................... 1.13

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Proc-ess

factor

Less than 4.49 ........................................................... 0.73 4.5 to 5.49 ................................................................. 0.80 5.5 to 5.99 ................................................................. 0.91 6.0 to 6.49 ................................................................. 0.99 6.5 to 6.99 ................................................................. 1.08 7.0 to 7.49 ................................................................. 1.17 7.5 to 7.99 ................................................................. 1.28 8.0 to 8.49 ................................................................. 1.39 8.5 to 8.99 ................................................................. 1.51 9.0 to 9.49 ................................................................. 1.65 9.5 or greater ............................................................. 1.72

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c)(1) In addition to the provisions contained above pertaining to COD, ammonia and sulfide, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT):

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00379 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

370

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.33

(i) For each of the regulated pollut-ant parameters listed below, the efflu-ent limitation for a given refinery is the sum of the products of each efflu-ent limitation factor times the applica-ble process feedstock rate, calculated as provided in 40 CFR 122.45(b). Appli-cable production processes are pre-sented in appendix A, by process type. The process identification numbers presented in this appendix A are for the convenience of the reader. They can be cross-referenced in the Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guide-lines, New Source Performance Standards, and Pretreatment Standards for the Pe-troleum Refining Point Source Category (EPA 440/1–82/014), Table III–7, pp. 49–54.

Pollutant or pollutant property and process type

BAT effluent limitation factor

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 cubic meters of feed-stock)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP): Crude .............................. 0 .037 0 .009 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .419 0 .102 Asphalt ............................ 0 .226 0 .055 Lube ............................... 1 .055 0 .257 Reforming and alkylation 0 .377 0 .092

Total chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .030 0 .011 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .340 0 .118 Asphalt ............................ 0 .183 0 .064 Lube ............................... 0 .855 0 .297 Reforming and alkylation 0 .305 0 .106

Hexavalent chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .0019 0 .0009 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .0218 0 .0098 Asphalt ............................ 0 .0117 0 .0053 Lube ............................... 0 .0549 0 .0248 Reforming and alkylation 0 .0196 0 .0088

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP): Crude .............................. 0 .013 0 .003 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .147 0 .036 Asphalt ............................ 0 .079 0 .019 Lube ............................... 0 .369 0 .090 Reforming and alkylation 0 .132 0 .032

Total chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .011 0 .004 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .119 0 .041 Asphalt ............................ 0 .064 0 .022 Lube ............................... 0 .299 0 .104 Reforming and alkylation 0 .107 0 .037

Hexavalent chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .0007 0 .0003 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .0076 0 .0034 Asphalt ............................ 0 .0041 0 .0019 Lube ............................... 0 .0192 0 .0087 Reforming and alkylation 0 .0069 0 .0031

(2) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.43(c)(2).

(d) The provisions of § 419.13(d) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(e) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(f) Effluent limitations for contaminated runoff. The following effluent limita-tions constitute the quantity and qual-ity of pollutants or pollutant prop-erties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated runoff, which may be discharged after the ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 110 mg/l total organic car-bon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 110 mg/l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged shall not exceed the quan-tity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as deter-mined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .35 0 .17 Total chromium ...................... 0 .60 0 .21 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .062 0 .028

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00380 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

371

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.34

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

COD 1 ..................................... 360 . 180 .

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .0029 0 .0014 Total chromium ...................... 0 .0050 0 .0018 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .00052 0 .00023 COD 1 ..................................... 3 .0 1 .5

1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the permitting authority may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgement of the permitting authority, adequate correlation data are not available, the ef-fluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.34 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT).

(a) Any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the fol-lowing effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology (BCT):

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock)

BOD5 ....................................... 34.6 18 .4 TSS .......................................... 23.4 14 .8 Oil and grease ......................... 11.1 5 .9 pH ............................................ (1) (1)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

BOD5 ....................................... 12.1 6 .5 TSS .......................................... 8.3 5 .25 Oil and grease ......................... 3.9 2 .1 pH ............................................ (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied

by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 24.9 ................................................... 0.73 25.0 to 49.9 ....................................................... 0.76 50.0 to 74.9 ....................................................... 0.83 75.0 to 99.9 ....................................................... 0.91 100.0 to 124.9 ................................................... 0.99 125.0 to 149.9 ................................................... 1.08 150.0 or greater ................................................. 1.13

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process fac-tor

Less than 4.49 ................................................... 0.73 4.5 to 5.49 ......................................................... 0.80 5.5 to 5.99 ......................................................... 0.91 6.0 to 6.49 ......................................................... 0.99 6.5 to 6.99 ......................................................... 1.08 7.0 to 7.49 ......................................................... 1.17 7.5 to 7.99 ......................................................... 1.28 8.0 to 8.49 ......................................................... 1.39 8.5 to 8.99 ......................................................... 1.51 9.0 to 9.49 ......................................................... 1.65 9.5 or greater ..................................................... 1.72

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c) The provisions of § 419.14(c) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section.

(e) Effluent limitations for contami-nated runoff. The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated run-off which may be discharged after the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00381 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

372

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.35

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease is not com-mingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollut-ants discharged shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as de-termined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the fol-lowing table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 48 . 26 . TSS ........................................ 33 . 21 . Oil and grease ....................... 15 . 8 . pH .......................................... (1) (1)

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 0 .40 0 .22 TSS ........................................ 0 .28 0 .18 Oil and grease ....................... 0 .13 0 .067 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

[50 FR 28526, July 12, 1985]

§ 419.35 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 and 403.13 any existing source subject to this subpart which introduces pol-lutants into a publicly owned treat-ment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES). The following stand-ards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW:

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards max-imum for any 1

day

(Milligrams per liter (mg/l))

Oil and grease ......................................... 100 Ammonia (as N) ...................................... 1 100

1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-nia set forth in § 419.33 (a) and (b).

§ 419.36 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

(a) Any new source subject to this subpart must achieve the following new source performance standards (NSPS):

Pollutant or pollutant property

NSPS Effluent Limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock)

BOD5 ..................................... 21 .8 11 .6 TSS ........................................ 14 .9 9 .5 COD1 ..................................... 133 .0 69 .0 Oil and grease ....................... 6 .6 3 .5 Phenolic compounds ............. 0 .158 .077 Ammonia as N ....................... 23 .4 10 .7 Sulfide .................................... 0 .140 0 .063 Total chromium ...................... 0 .32 0 .19 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .025 0 .012 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

BOD5 ..................................... 7 .7 4 .1 TSS ........................................ 5 .2 3 .3 COD1 ..................................... 47 .0 24 .0 Oil and grease ....................... 2 .4 1 .3 Phenolic compounds ............. 0 .056 0 .027 Ammonia as N ....................... 8 .3 3 .8 Sulfide .................................... 0 .050 0 .022 Total chromium ...................... 0 .116 0 .068 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .0096 0 .0044 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d). 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 24.9 ................................................... 0.73 25.0 to 49.9 ....................................................... 0.76 50.0 to 74.9 ....................................................... 0.83 75.0 to 99.9 ....................................................... 0.91 100.0 to 124.9 ................................................... 0.99 125.0 to 149.9 ................................................... 1.08 150.0 or greater ................................................. 1.13

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process fac-tor

Less than 4.49 ................................................... 0.73 4.5 to 5.49 ......................................................... 0.80 5.5 to 5.99 ......................................................... 0.91 6.0 to 6.49 ......................................................... 0.99

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00382 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

373

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.42

Process configuration Process fac-tor

6.5 to 6.99 ......................................................... 1.08 7.0 to 7.49 ......................................................... 1.17 7.5 to 7.99 ......................................................... 1.28 8.0 to 8.49 ......................................................... 1.39 8.5 to 8.99 ......................................................... 1.51 9.0 to 9.49 ......................................................... 1.65 9.5 or greater ..................................................... 1.72

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c) The provisions of § 419.16(c) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(e) Effluent Limitations for Runoff. [Reserved]

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.37 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7, any new source subject to this subpart which introduces pollutants into a pub-licly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

(a) The following standards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW:

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for new sources maximum

for any 1 day

Milligrams per liter (mg/l)

Oil and grease ......................................... 100 Ammonia (as N) ...................................... 1 100

1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-nia set forth in § 419.36 (a) and (b).

(b) The following standard is applied to the cooling tower discharge part of the total refinery flow to the POTW by multiplying: (1) The standard; (2) by

the total refinery flow to the POTW; and (3) by the ratio of the cooling tower discharge flow to the total refin-ery flow.

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for new sources maximum

for any 1 day

Miligrams per liter (mg/l)

Total chromium ........................................ 1

Subpart D—Lube Subcategory

§ 419.40 Applicability; description of the lube subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to all discharges from any fa-cility that produces petroleum prod-ucts by the use of topping, cracking, and lube oil manufacturing processes, whether or not the facility includes any process in addition to topping, cracking, and lube oil manufacturing processes. The provisions of this sub-part are not applicable, however, to fa-cilities that include the processes spec-ified in subparts C and E of this part.

§ 419.41 Specialized definitions.

The general definitions, abbrevia-tions and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter and the spe-cialized definitions set forth in § 419.11 shall apply to this subpart.

§ 419.42 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00383 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

374

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.42

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock)

BOD5 ..................................... 50 .6 25 .8 TSS ........................................ 35 .6 22 .7 COD1 ..................................... 360 .0 187 .0 Oil and grease ....................... 16 .2 8 .5 Phenolic compounds ............. 0 .38 0 .184 Ammonia as N ....................... 23 .4 10 .6 Sulfide .................................... 0 .33 0 .150 Total chromium ...................... 0 .77 0 .45 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .068 0 .030 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

BOD5 ..................................... 17 .9 9 .1 TSS ........................................ 12 .5 8 .0 COD1 ..................................... 127 .0 66 .0 Oil and grease ....................... 5 .7 3 .0 Phenolic compounds ............. 0 .133 0 .065 Ammonia as N ....................... 8 .3 3 .8 Sulfide .................................... 0 .118 0 .053 Total chromium ...................... 0 .273 0 .160 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .024 0 .011 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d). 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 49.9 ..................................................... 0 .71 50.0 to 74.9 ......................................................... 0 .74 75.0 to 99.9 ......................................................... 0 .81 100.0 to 124.9 ..................................................... 0 .88 125.0 to 149.9 ..................................................... 0 .97 150.0 to 174.9 ..................................................... 1 .05 175.0 to 199.9 ..................................................... 1 .14 200.0 or greater ................................................... 1 .19

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process factor

Less than 6.49 ..................................................... 0 .81 6.5 to 7.49 ........................................................... 0 .88 7.5 to 7.99 ........................................................... 1 .00 8.0 to 8.49 ........................................................... 1 .09 8.5 to 8.99 ........................................................... 1 .19 9.0 to 9.49 ........................................................... 1 .29 9.5 to 9.99 ........................................................... 1 .41 10.0 to 10.49 ....................................................... 1 .53 10.5 to 10.99 ....................................................... 1 .67 11.0 to 11.49 ....................................................... 1 .82 11.5 to 11.99 ....................................................... 1 .98 12.0 to 12.49 ....................................................... 2 .15

Process configuration Process factor

12.5 to 12.99 ....................................................... 2 .34 13.0 or greater ..................................................... 2 .44

(3) Example of the application of the above factors. Example—Lube refinery 125, 000 bbl per stream day throughput.

CALCULATION OF THE PROCESS CONFIGURATION

Process category Process included Weighting factor

Crude .................... Atm crude distillation ..........Vacuum, crude distillation ..Desalting .............................

1

Cracking and cok-ing.

Fluid cat. cracking ..............Vis-breaking ........................Thermal cracking ................Moving bed cat. cracking ...Hydrocracking .....................Fluid coking ........................Delayed coking ...................

6

Lube ...................... Further defined in the de-velopment document.

13

Asphalt .................. Asphalt production ..............Asphalt oxidation ................Asphalt emulsifying ............

12

Process

Capacity (1,000 bbl per stream

day)

Capacity relative to throughput

Weighting Factor

Proc-essing con-

figura-tion

Crude: Atm ..... 125 .0 1 .0 ................ ............Vacu-

um .. 60 .0 0 .48 ................ ............Desalti-

ng ... 125 .0 1 .0 ................ ............Total ...................... 2 .48 ×1 =2 .48

Cracking- FCC .... 41 .0 0 .328 ................ ............

Hydrocra-cking ... 20 .0 0 .160 ................ ............

Total ...................... 0 .488 ×6 =2 .93 Lubes ..... 5 .3 0 .042 ................ ............

4 .0 0 .032 ................ ............4 .9 0 .039 ................ ............

Total ...................... 0 .113 ×13 =1 .47 Asphalt ... 4 .0 0 .032 ×12 = .38 Refinery

process con-figura-tion ..... ...................... .................. ................ =7 .26

Notes: See Table § 419.42(b)(2) for process factor. Process

factor=0.88. See Table § 419.42(b)(1) for size factor for 125,000 bbl per

stream day lube refinery. Size factor=0.97. To calculate the limits for each parameter, multiply the limit

§ 419.42(a) by both the process factor and size factor. BOD5 limit (maximum for any 1 day)=17.9×0.88×0.97=15.3 lb. per 1,000 bbl of feedstock.

(c) The provisions of § 419.12(c) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00384 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

375

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.43

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(e) Effluent limitations for contami-nated runoff. The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated run-off, which may be discharged after the application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease and 110 mg/l total organic carbon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease or 110 mg/ l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as determined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 48 . 26 . TSS ........................................ 33 . 21 . COD 1 ..................................... 360 . 180 . Oil and grease ....................... 15 . 8 . Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .35 0 .17 Total chromium ...................... 0 .73 0 .43 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .062 0 .028 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 0 .40 0 .22 TSS ........................................ 0 .28 0 .18 COD 1 ..................................... 3 .0 1 .5 Oil and grease ....................... 0 .13 0 .067 Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .0029 0 .0014 Total chromium ...................... 0 .0060 0 .0035 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .00052 0 .00023 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the permitting authority may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgment of the permitting authority, adequate correlation data are not available, the ef-fluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5.

2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28522, 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.43 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT):

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per

COD 1 ............................................. 360 .0 187 .0 Ammonia as N ............................... 23 .4 10 .6 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .33 0 .150

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feed-stock)

COD 1 ............................................. 127 .0 66 .0 Ammonia as N ............................... 8 .3 3 .8

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00385 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

376

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.43

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

Sulfide ............................................ 0 .118 0 .053

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d).

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size fac-tor

Less than 49.9 ....................................................... 0.71 50.0 to 74.9 ........................................................... 0.74 75.0 to 99.9 ........................................................... 0.81 100.0 to 124.9 ....................................................... 0.88 125.0 to 149.9 ....................................................... 0.97 150.0 to 174.9 ....................................................... 1.05 175.0 to 199.9 ....................................................... 1.14 200.0 or greater ..................................................... 1.19

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process factor

Less than 6.49 ....................................................... 0.81 6.5 to 7.49 ............................................................. 0.88 7.5 to 7.99 ............................................................. 1.00 8.0 to 8.49 ............................................................. 1.09 8.5 to 8.99 ............................................................. 1.19 9.0 to 9.49 ............................................................. 1.29 9.5 to 9.99 ............................................................. 1.41 10.0 to 10.49 ......................................................... 1.53 10.5 to 10.99 ......................................................... 1.67 11.0 to 11.49 ......................................................... 1.82 11.5 to 11.99 ......................................................... 1.98 12.0 to 12.49 ......................................................... 2.15 12.5 to 12.99 ......................................................... 2.34 13.0 or greater ....................................................... 2.44

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c)(1) In addition to the provisions contained above pertaining to COD, ammonia and sulfide, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT):

(i) For each of the regulated pollut-ant parameters listed below, the efflu-ent limitation for a given refinery is the sum of the products of each efflu-ent limitation factor times the applica-ble process feedstock rate, calculated

as provided in 40 CFR 122.45(b). Appli-cable production processes are pre-sented in appendix A, by process type. The process identification numbers presented in this appendix A are for the convenience of the reader. They can be cross-referenced in the Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guide-lines, New Source Performance Standards, and Pretreatment Standards for the Pe-troleum Refining Point Source Category (EPA 440/1–82/014), Table III–7, pp. 49–54.

Pollutant or pollutant property and process type

BAT effluent limitation factor

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP): Crude .............................. 0 .037 0 .009 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .419 0 .102 Asphalt ............................ 0 .226 0 .055 Lube ............................... 1 .055 0 .257 Reforming and alkylation 0 .377 0 .092

Total chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .030 0 .011 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .340 0 .118 Asphalt ............................ 0 .183 0 .064 Lube ............................... 0 .855 0 .297 Reforming and alkylation 0 .305 0 .106

Hexavalent chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .0019 0 .0009 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .0218 0 .0098 Asphalt ............................ 0 .0117 0 .0053 Lube ............................... 0 .0549 0 .0248 Reforming and alkylation 0 .0196 0 .0088

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP): Crude .............................. 0 .013 0 .003 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .147 0 .036 Asphalt ............................ 0 .079 0 .019 Lube ............................... 0 .369 0 .090 Reforming and alkylation 0 .132 0 .032

Total chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .011 0 .004 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .119 0 .041 Asphalt ............................ 0 .064 0 .022 Lube ............................... 0 .299 0 .104 Reforming and alkylation 0 .107 0 .037

Hexavalent chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .0007 0 .0003 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .0076 0 .0034 Asphalt ............................ 0 .0041 0 .0019 Lube ............................... 0 .0192 0 .0087 Reforming and alkylation 0 .0069 0 .0031

(2) Example Application of Effluent Limitations Guidelines as Applicable to Phenolic Compounds, Hexavalent Chromium, and Total Chromium. The following example presents the derivation of a BAT phenolic compound

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00386 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

377

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.44

(4AAP) effluent limitation (30-day av-erage) for a petroleum refinery permit. The methodology is also applicable to hexavalent chromium and total chro-mium.

Refinery process

Process feedstock rate 1,000

bbl/day

1. Atmospheric crude distillation ....................... 100 2. Crude desalting ............................................. 50 3. Vacuum crude distillation .............................. 75

Total crude processes (C) ...................... 225 6. Fluid catalytic cracking .................................. 25 10. Hydrocracking .............................................. 20

Total cracking and coking processes (K) 45 18. Asphalt production ....................................... 5

Total asphalt processes (A) .................... 5 21. Hydrofining .................................................. 3

Total lube processes (L) ......................... 3 8. Catalytic reforming ........................................ 10

Total reforming and alkylation processes (R) ....................................................... 10

NOTE: 30 day average effluent limitation for phenolic compounds (4AAP), lb/ day=(0.003) (225)+(0.036) (45)+(0.019) (5)+(0.090) (3)+(0.032) (10)=2.98 lb/day.

(d) The provisions of § 419.13(d) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(e) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(f) Effluent limitations for contaminated runoff. The following effluent limita-tions constitute the quantity and qual-ity of pollutants or pollutant prop-erties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated runoff, which may be discharged after the ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 110 mg/l total organic car-bon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 110 mg/l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged shall not exceed the quan-tity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as deter-mined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .35 0 .17 Total chromium ...................... 0 .60 0 .21 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .062 0 .028 COD 1 ..................................... 360 . 180 .

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .0029 0 .0014 Total chromium ...................... 0 .0050 0 .0018 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .00052 0 .00023 COD 1 ..................................... 3 .0 1 .5

1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the permitting authority may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgement of the permitting authority, adequate correlation data are not available, the ef-fluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28523, 28524, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.44 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT).

(a) Any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the fol-lowing effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology (BCT):

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00387 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

378

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.44

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock

BOD5 ......................................... 50.6 25.8 TSS ............................................ 35.6 22.7 Oil and Grease .......................... 16.2 8.5 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

BOD5 ......................................... 17.9 9.1 TSS ............................................ 12.5 8.0 Oil and Grease .......................... 5.7 3.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 49.9 ................................................... 0.71 50.0 to 74.9 ....................................................... 0.74 75.0 to 99.9 ....................................................... 0.81 100.0 to 124.9 ................................................... 0.88 125.0 to 149.9 ................................................... 0.97 150.0 to 174.9 ................................................... 1.05 175.0 to 199.9 ................................................... 1.14 200.0 or greater ................................................. 1.19

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process fac-tor

Less than 6.49 ................................................... 0.81 6.5 to 7.49 ......................................................... 0.88 7.5 to 7.99 ......................................................... 1.00 8.0 to 8.49 ......................................................... 1.09 8.5 to 8.99 ......................................................... 1.19 9.0 to 9.49 ......................................................... 1.29 9.5 to 9.99 ......................................................... 1.41 10.0 to 10.49 ..................................................... 1.53 10.5 to 10.99 ..................................................... 1.67 11.0 to 11.49 ..................................................... 1.82 11.5 to 11.99 ..................................................... 1.98 12.0 to 12.49 ..................................................... 2.15 12.5 to 12.99 ..................................................... 2.34 13.0 or greater ................................................... 2.44

(c) The provisions of § 419.14(c) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable

to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section.

(e) Effluent limitations for contami-nated runoff. The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated run-off which may be discharged after the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease is not com-mingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollut-ants discharged shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as de-termined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the fol-lowing table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric unit (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 48 . 26 . TSS ........................................ 33 . 21 . Oil and grease ....................... 15 . 8 . pH .......................................... (1) (1)

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

BOD5 ...................................... 0 .40 0 .22 TSS ........................................ 0 .28 0 .18 Oil and grease ....................... 0 .13 0 .067 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

[50 FR 28526, July 12, 1985]

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00388 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

379

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.46

§ 419.45 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 and 403.13 any existing source subject to this subpart which introduces pol-lutants into a publicly owned treat-ment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES). The following stand-ards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW:

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for ex-isting sources—

maximum for any 1 day

Milligrams per liter (mg/l)

Oil and grease ......................................... 100 Ammonia (as N) ...................................... 1 100

1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-nia set forth in § 419.43 (a) and (b).

§ 419.46 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

(a) Any new source subject to this subpart must achieve the following new source performance standards (NSPS):

Pollutant or pollutant prop-erty

NSPS effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock)

BOD5 ................................. 34 .6 18 .4 TSS .................................... 23 .4 14 .9 COD 1 ................................. 245 .0 126 .0 Oil and grease ................... 10 .5 5 .6 Phenolic compounds ......... 0 .25 0 .12 Ammonia as N ................... 23 .4 10 .7 Sulfide ................................ 0 .220 0 .10 Total chromium .................. 0 .52 0 .31 Hexavalent chromium ........ 0 .046 0 .021 pH ...................................... (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

BOD 1 ................................. 12 .2 6 .5 TSS .................................... 8 .3 5 .3 COD 1 ................................. 87 .0 45 .0 Oil and grease ................... 3 .8 2 .0 Phenolic compounds ......... 0 .088 0 .043 Ammonia as N ................... 8 .3 3 .8 Sulfide ................................ 0 .078 0 .035 Total chromium .................. 0 .180 0 .105 Hexavalent chromium ........ 0 .022 0 .0072

Pollutant or pollutant prop-erty

NSPS effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

pH ...................................... (2) (2)

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d). 2 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size fac-tor

Less than 49.9 ....................................................... 0.71 50.0 to 74.9 ........................................................... 0.74 75.0 to 99.9 ........................................................... 0.81 100.0 to 124.9 ....................................................... 0.88 125.0 to 149.9 ....................................................... 0.97 150.0 to 174.9 ....................................................... 1.05 175.0 to 199.9 ....................................................... 1.14 200.0 or greater ..................................................... 1.19

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process factor

Less than 6.49 ....................................................... 0.81 6.5 to 7.49 ............................................................. 0.88 7.5 to 7.99 ............................................................. 1.00 8.0 to 8.49 ............................................................. 1.09 8.5 to 8.99 ............................................................. 1.19 9.0 to 9.49 ............................................................. 1.29 9.5 to 9.99 ............................................................. 1.41 10.0 to 10.49 ......................................................... 1.53 10.5 to 10.99 ......................................................... 1.67 11.0 to 11.49 ......................................................... 1.82 11.5 to 11.99 ......................................................... 1.98 12.0 to 12.49 ......................................................... 2.15 12.5 to 12.99 ......................................................... 2.34 13.0 or greater ....................................................... 2.44

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c) The provisions of § 419.16(c) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provision of this subpart.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/1.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00389 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

380

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.47

(e) Effluent Limitations for Runoff. [Reserved]

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28523, 28528, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.47 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7, any new source subject to this subpart which introduces pollutants into a pub-licly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

(a) The following standards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW:

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for new

sources, max-imum for any 1

day

Milligrams per liter (mg/l)

Oil and grease ......................................... 100 Ammonia (as N) ...................................... 1 100

1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-nia set forth in § 419.46 (a) and (b).

(b) The following standard is applied to the cooling tower discharge part of the total refinery flow to the POTW by multiplying: (1) The standard; (2) by the total refinery flow to the POTW; and (3) by the ratio of the cooling tower discharge flow to the total refin-ery flow.

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for new

sources, max-imum for any 1

day

Milligrams per liter (mg/l)

Total chromium ........................................ 1

Subpart E—Integrated Subcategory

§ 419.50 Applicability; description of the integrated subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart are ap-plicable to all discharges resulting from any facility that produces petro-leum products by the use of topping, cracking, lube oil manufacturing proc-esses, and petrochemical operations,

whether or not the facility includes any process in addition to topping, cracking, lube oil manufacturing proc-esses, and petrochemical operations.

§ 419.51 Specialized definitions. The general definitions, abbrevia-

tions, and methods of analysis set forth in part 401 of this chapter and the spe-cialized definitions set forth in § 419.31 shall apply to this subpart.

§ 419.52 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT Effluent Limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock)

BOD5 ..................................... 54 .4 28 .9 TSS ........................................ 37 .3 23 .7 COD1 ..................................... 388 .0 198 .0 Oil and grease ....................... 17 .1 9 .1 Phenolic compounds ............. 0 .40 0 .192 Ammonia as N ....................... 23 .4 10 .6 Sulfide .................................... 0 .35 0 .158 Total Chromium ..................... 0 .82 0 .48 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .068 0 .032 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

BOD 1 ..................................... 19 .2 10 .2 TSS ........................................ 13 .2 8 .4 COD 1 ..................................... 136 .0 70 .0 Oil and grease ....................... 6 .0 3 .2 Phenolic compounds ............. 0 .14 0 .068 Ammonia as N ....................... 8 .3 3 .8 Sulfide .................................... 0 .124 0 .056 Total chromium ...................... 0 .29 0 .17 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .025 0 .011 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d). 2 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00390 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

381

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.53

maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 124.9 ................................................. 0.73 125.0 to 149.9 ................................................... 0.76 150.0 to 174.9 ................................................... 0.83 175.0 to 199.9 ................................................... 0.91 200.0 to 224.9 ................................................... 0.99 225 or greater .................................................... 1.04

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process fac-tor

Less than 6.49 ................................................... 0.75 6.5 to 7.49 ......................................................... 0.82 7.5 to 7.99 ......................................................... 0.92 8.0 to 8.49 ......................................................... 1.00 8.5 to 8.99 ......................................................... 1.10 9.0 to 9.49 ......................................................... 1.20 9.5 to 9.99 ......................................................... 1.30 10.0 to 10.49 ..................................................... 1.42 10.5 to 10.99 ..................................................... 1.54 11.0 to 11.49 ..................................................... 1.68 11.5 to 11.99 ..................................................... 1.83 12.0 to 12.49 ..................................................... 1.99 12.5 to 12.99 ..................................................... 2.17 13.0 or greater ................................................... 2.26

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c) The provisions of § 419.12(c) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provision of this subpart.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(e) Effluent limitations for contami-nated runoff. The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated run-off, which may be discharged after the application of the best practicable con-trol technology currently available by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease and 110 mg/l total organic carbon (TOC)

based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease or 110 mg/ l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as determined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BPT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

BOD5 ..................................... 48 . 26 . TSS ........................................ 33 . 21 . COD 1 ..................................... 360 . 180 . Oil and grease ....................... 15 . 8 . Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .35 0 .17 Total chromium ...................... 0 .73 0 .43 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .062 0 .028 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

BOD5 ..................................... 0 .40 0 .22 TSS ........................................ 0 .28 0 .18 COD 1 ..................................... 3 .0 1 .5 Oil and grease ....................... 0 .13 0 .067 Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .0029 0 .0014 Total chromium ...................... 0 .0060 0 .0035 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .00052 0 .00023 pH .......................................... (2) (2)

1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the permitting authority may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgment of the permitting authority, adequate correlation data are not available, the ef-fluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5.

2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28522, 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.53 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00391 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

382

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.53

source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limita-tions representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT):

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT Effluent Limita-tions

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feed-stock)

COD 1 ............................................. 388 .0 198 .0 Ammonia as N ............................... 23 .4 10 .6 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .35 0 .158

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feed-stock)

COD 1 ............................................. 136 .0 70 .0 Ammonia as N ............................... 8 .3 3 .8 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .124 0 .056

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d).

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 124.9 ................................................. 0.73 125.0 to 149.9 ................................................... 0.76 150.0 to 174.9 ................................................... 0.83 175.0 to 199.9 ................................................... 0.91 200 to 224.9 ...................................................... 0.99 225 or greater .................................................... 1.04

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process fac-tor

Less than 6.49 ................................................... 0.75 6.5 to 7.49 ......................................................... 0.82 7.5 to 7.99 ......................................................... 0.92 8.0 to 8.49 ......................................................... 1.00 8.5 to 8.99 ......................................................... 1.10 9.0 to 9.49 ......................................................... 1.20 9.5 to 9.99 ......................................................... 1.30 10.0 to 10.49 ..................................................... 1.42 10.5 to 10.99 ..................................................... 1.54 11.0 to 11.49 ..................................................... 1.68 11.5 to 11.99 ..................................................... 1.83 12.0 to 12.49 ..................................................... 1.99 12.5 to 12.99 ..................................................... 2.17 13.0 or greater ................................................... 2.26

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c)(1) In addition to the provisions contained above pertaining to COD, ammonia and sulfide, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT):

(i) For each of the regulated pollut-ant parameters listed below, the efflu-ent limitation for a given refinery is the sum of the products of each efflu-ent limitation factor times the applica-ble process feedstock rate, calculated as provided in 40 CFR 122.45(b). Appli-cable production processes are pre-sented in appendix A, by process type. The process identification numbers presented in this appendix A are for the convenience of the reader. They can be cross-referenced in the Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guide-lines, New Source Performance Standards, and Pretreatment Standards for the Pe-troleum Refining Point Source Category (EPA 440/1–82/014), Table III–7, pp. 49–54.

Pollutant or pollutant property and process type

BAT effluent limitation factor

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 cubic meters of feed-stock)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP): Crude .............................. 0 .037 0 .009 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .419 0 .102 Asphalt ............................ 0 .226 0 .055 Lube ............................... 1 .055 0 .257 Reforming and alkylation 0 .377 0 .092

Total chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .030 0 .011 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .340 0 .118 Asphalt ............................ 0 .183 0 .064 Lube ............................... 0 .855 0 .297 Reforming and alkylation 0 .305 0 .106

Hexavalent chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .0019 0 .0009 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .0218 0 .0098 Asphalt ............................ 0 .0117 0 .0053 Lube ............................... 0 .0549 0 .0248 Reforming and alkylation 0 .0196 0 .0088

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP): Crude .............................. 0 .013 0 .003 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .147 0 .036 Asphalt ............................ 0 .079 0 .019

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00392 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

383

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.54

Pollutant or pollutant property and process type

BAT effluent limitation factor

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Lube ............................... 0 .369 0 .090 Reforming and alkylation 0 .132 0 .032

Total chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .011 0 .004 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .119 0 .041 Asphalt ............................ 0 .064 0 .022 Lube ............................... 0 .299 0 .104 Reforming and alkylation 0 .107 0 .037

Hexavalent chromium: Crude .............................. 0 .0007 0 .0003 Cracking and coking ....... 0 .0076 0 .0034 Asphalt ............................ 0 .0041 0 .0019 Lube ............................... 0 .0192 0 .0087 Reforming and alkylation 0 .0069 0 .0031

(2) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.43(c)(2).

(d) The provisions of § 419.13(d) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(e) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(f) Effluent limitations for contaminated runoff. The following effluent limita-tions constitute the quantity and qual-ity of pollutants or pollutant prop-erties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated runoff, which may be discharged after the ap-plication of the best available tech-nology economically achievable by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 110 mg/l total organic car-bon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 110 mg/l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged shall not exceed the quan-

tity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as deter-mined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the following table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BAT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not ex-

ceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of flow)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .35 0 .17 Total chromium ...................... 0 .60 0 .21 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .062 0 .028 COD 1 ..................................... 360 . 180 .

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0 .0029 0 .0014 Total chromium ...................... 0 .0050 0 .0018 Hexavalent chromium ............ 0 .00052 0 .00023 COD 1 ..................................... 3 .0 1 .5

1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the permitting authority may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgement of the permitting authority, adequate correlation data are not available, the ef-fluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.54 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT).

(a) Any existing point subject to this subpart must achieve the following ef-fluent limitations representing the de-gree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conven-tional pollutant control technology (BCT):

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock)

BOD5 ......................................... 54.4 28.9 TSS ............................................ 37.3 23.7 Oil and grease ........................... 17.1 9.1

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00393 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

384

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) § 419.55

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

pH .............................................. (1) (1)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feedstock)

BOD5 ......................................... 19.2 10.2 TSS ............................................ 13.2 8.4 Oil and grease ........................... 6.0 3.2 ph ............................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor

Less than 124.9 ................................................. 0.73 125.0 to 149.9 ................................................... 0.76 150.0 to 174.9 ................................................... 0.83 175. to 199.9 ..................................................... 0.91 200.0 to 224.9 ................................................... 0.99 225.0 or greater ................................................. 1.04

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process fac-tor

Less than 6.49 ................................................... 0.75 6.5 to 7.49 ......................................................... 0.82 7.5 to 7.99 ......................................................... 0.92 8.0 to 8.49 ......................................................... 1.00 8.5 to 8.99 ......................................................... 1.10 9.0 to 9.49 ......................................................... 1.20 9.5 to 9.99 ......................................................... 1.30 10.0 to 10.49 ..................................................... 1.42 10.5 to 10.99 ..................................................... 1.54 11.0 to 11.49 ..................................................... 1.68 11.5 to 11.99 ..................................................... 1.83 12.0 to 12.49 ..................................................... 1.99 12.5 to 12.99 ..................................................... 2.17 13.0 or greater ................................................... 2.26

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c) The provisions of § 419.14(c) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge alllowed by paragraph (b) of this section.

(e) Effluent limitations for contami-nated runoff. The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this paragraph and attributable to contaminated run-off which may be discharged after the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology by a point source subject to this subpart.

(1) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not com-mingled or treated with process waste-water, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.

(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-gled or treated with process waste-water, or if wastewater consisting sole-ly of contaminated runoff which ex-ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease is not com-mingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollut-ants discharged shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as de-termined by the permit writer times the concentrations listed in the fol-lowing table:

Pollutant or pollutant property

BCT effluent limitations for contaminated runoff

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feedstock)

BOD5 ......................................... 48. 26. TSS ............................................ 33. 21. Oil and grease ........................... 15. 8. pH .............................................. (1) (1)

English units (pounds per 1,000 gallons of flow)

BOD5 ......................................... 0.40 0.22 TSS ............................................ 0.28 0.18 Oil and grease ........................... 0.13 0.067 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

[50 FR 28527, July 12, 1985]

§ 419.55 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 and 403.13 any existing source subject

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00394 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

385

Environmental Protection Agency § 419.57

to this subpart which introduces pol-lutants into a publicly owned treat-ment works must comply with 40 CFR 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES). The following stand-ards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW:

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for existing sources—

maximum for any 1 day

Milligrams per liter (mg/

l)

Oil and grease .................................................. 100 Ammonia (as N) ................................................ 1100

1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-nia set forth in § 419.53 (a) and (b).

§ 419.56 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).

(a) Any new source subject to this subpart must achieve the following new source performance standards (NSPS):

Pollutant or pollutant property

NSPS effluent limitation

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days shall not exceed

Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 m3 of feed-stock)

BOD5 ............................................. 41 .6 22 .1 TSS ................................................ 28 .1 17 .9 COD 1 ............................................. 295 .0 152 .0 Oil and grease ............................... 12 .6 6 .7 Phenolic compounds ..................... 0 .30 0 .14 Ammonia as N ............................... 23 .4 10 .7 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .26 0 .12 Total chromium .............................. 0 .64 0 .37 Hexavalent chromium .................... 0 .052 0 .024 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

English units (pounds per 1,000 bbl of feed-stock)

BOD5 ............................................. 14 .7 7 .8 TSS ................................................ 9 .9 6 .3 COD 1 ............................................. 104 .0 54 .0 Oil and grease ............................... 4 .5 2 .4 Phenolic compounds ..................... 0 .105 0 .051 Ammonia as N ............................... 8 .3 3 .8 Sulfide ............................................ 0 .093 0 .042 Total chromium .............................. 0 .220 0 .13 Hexavalent chromium .................... 0 .019 0 .0084 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d).

2 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are to be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for thirty consecutive days.

(1) Size factor.

1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size fac-tor

Less than 124.9 ..................................................... 0.73 125.0 to 149.9 ....................................................... 0.76 150.0 to 174.9 ....................................................... 0.83 175.0 to 199.9 ....................................................... 0.91 200 to 224.9 .......................................................... 0.99 225 or greater ........................................................ 1.04

(2) Process factor.

Process configuration Process factor

Less than 6.49 ....................................................... 0.75 6.5 to 7.49 ............................................................. 0.82 7.5 to 7.99 ............................................................. 0.92 8.0 to 8.49 ............................................................. 1.00 8.5 to 8.99 ............................................................. 1.10 9.0 to 9.49 ............................................................. 1.20 9.5 to 9.99 ............................................................. 1.30 10.0 to 10.49 ......................................................... 1.42 10.5 to 10.99 ......................................................... 1.54 11.0 to 11.49 ......................................................... 1.68 11.5 to 11.99 ......................................................... 1.83 12.0 to 12.49 ......................................................... 1.99 12.5 to 12.99 ......................................................... 2.17 13.0 or greater ....................................................... 2.26

(3) See the comprehensive example in subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).

(c) The provisions of § 419.16(c) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provision of this subpart.

(d) The quantity and quality of pol-lutants or pollutant properties con-trolled by this paragraph, attributable to once-through cooling water, are ex-cluded from the discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of this section. Once- through cooling water may be dis-charged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.

(e) Effluent Limitations for Runoff. [Reserved]

[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 28523, 28528, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

§ 419.57 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7, any new source subject to this subpart

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00395 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

386

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–06 Edition) Pt. 419, App. A

which introduces pollutants into a pub-licly owned treatment works must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

(a) The following standards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW:

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for new

sources— maximum for

any 1 day

Milligrams per liter (mg/

l)

Oil and grease .................................................. 100 Ammonia (as N) ................................................ 1 100

1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-nia set forth in § 419.56 (a) and (b).

(b) The following standard is applied to the cooling tower discharge part of the total refinery flow to the POTW by multiplying: (1) The standards; (2) by the total refinery flow to the POTW; and (3) by the ratio of the cooling tower discharge flow to the total refin-ery flow.

Pollutant or pollutant property

Pretreatment standards for new

sources— maximum for

any 1 day

Milligrams per liter (mg/

1)

Total chromium ................................................. 1

APPENDIX A TO PART 419—PROCESSES INCLUDED IN THE DETERMINATION OF BAT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS FOR TOTAL CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM, AND PHENOLIC COM-POUNDS (4AAP)

Crude Processes

1. Atmospheric Crude Distillation 2. Crude Desalting 3. Vacuum Crude Distillation

Cracking and Coking Processes

4. Visbreaking 5. Thermal Cracking 6. Fluid Catalytic Cracking 7. Moving Bed Catalytic Cracking 10. Hydrocracking 15. Delayed Coking 16. Fluid Coking

54. Hydrotreating

Asphalt Processes

18. Asphalt Production 32. 200° F Softening Point Unfluxed Asphalt 43. Asphalt Oxidizing 89. Asphalt Emulsifying

Lube Processes

21. Hydrofining, Hydrofinishing, Lube Hydrofining

22. White Oil Manufacture 23. Propane Dewaxing, Propane

Deasphalting, Propane Fractioning, Pro-pane Deresining

24. Duo Sol, Solvent Treating, Solvent Ex-traction, Duotreating, Solvent Dewaxing, Solvent Deasphalting

25. Lube Vac Twr, Oil Fractionation, Batch Still (Naphtha Strip), Bright Stock Treat-ing

26. Centrifuge and Chilling 27. MEK Dewaxing, Ketone Dewaxing, MEK-

Toluene Dewaxing 28. Deoiling (wax) 29. Naphthenic Lubes Production 30. SO2 Extraction 34. Wax Pressing 35. Wax Plant (with Neutral Separation) 36. Furfural Extraction 37. Clay Contacting—Percolation 38. Wax Sweating 39. Acid Treating 40. Phenol Extraction

Reforming and Alkylation Processes

8. H2SO4 Alkylation 12. Catalytic Reforming

[50 FR 28528, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, 1985]

PART 420—IRON AND STEEL MANU-FACTURING POINT SOURCE CAT-EGORY

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 420.01 Applicability. 420.02 General definitions. 420.03 Alternative effluent limitations rep-

resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of best practicable control technology currently available, best available technology eco-nomically achievable, best available demonstrated control technology, and best conventional pollutant control tech-nology (the ‘‘water bubble’’).

420.04 Calculation of pretreatment stand-ards.

420.05 Pretreatment standards compliance date.

420.06 Removal credits for phenols (4AAP).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 208168 PO 00000 Frm 00396 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\208168.XXX 208168

CATEGORY 419 ATTACHMENT F

94

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–10 Edition) § 429.91

introduction of process wastewater pol-lutants into a publicly owned treat-ment works from wood preserving oper-ations which use the Boulton process as the predominant method of condi-tioning stock.

§ 429.91 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must

achieve the following effluent limita-

tions representing the degree of efflu-

ent reduction attainable by the appli-

cation of the best practicable control

technology (BPT): There shall be no

discharge of process wastewater pollut-

ants into navigable waters.

§ 429.92 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

§ 429.93 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30

through 125.32, any existing point

source subject to this subpart must

achieve the following effluent limita-

tions representing the degree of efflu-

ent reduction attainable by the appli-

cation of the best available technology

economically achievable (BAT): There

shall be no discharge of process waste-

water pollutants into navigable waters.

§ 429.94 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Any new source subject to this sub-

part must achieve the following new

source performance standards (NSPS):

There shall be no discharge of process

wastewater pollutants into navigable

waters.

§ 429.95 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7

and 403.13, any existing source subject

to this subpart which introduces proc-

ess wastewater pollutants into a pub-

licly owned treatment works must

comply with 40 CFR part 403 and meet

the following pretreatment standards

for existing sources (PSES):

SUBPART H [PSES Effluent Limitations]

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day (mg/l)

Oil and grease ....................................................... 100 Copper ................................................................... 5 Chromium .............................................................. 4 Arsenic ................................................................... 4

In cases where POTWs find it necessary

to impose mass limitations, the fol-

lowing equivalent mass limitations are

provided as guidance.

SUBPART H [PSES Effluent Limitations; grams per cu m of production]

Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1

day

Oil and grease ....................................................... 20.5 Copper ................................................................... .62 Chromium .............................................................. .41 Arsenic ................................................................... .41

§ 429.96 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7,

any new source subject to this subpart

which introduces process wastewater

pollutants into a publicly owned treat-

ment works must comply with 40 CFR

part 403 and achieve the following

pretreatment standards for new

sources (PSNS): There shall be no in-

troduction of process wastewater pol-

lutants into publicly owned treatment

works.

Subpart I—Wet Storage Subcategory

§ 429.100 Applicability; description of the wet storage subcategory.

This subpart applies to discharges to

waters of the United States and to the

introduction of process wastewater pol-

lutants into publicly owned treatment

works from the storage of unprocessed

wood, i.e., the storage of logs or

roundwood before or after removal of

bark in self-contained bodies of water

VerDate Mar<15>2010 10:18 Aug 10, 2010 Jkt 220171 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220171.XXX 220171WR

eier

-Avi

les

on D

SK

GB

LS3C

1PR

OD

with

CF

R

CATEGORY 429 ATTACHMENT F

RMorey
Text Box
Subpart I only

95

Environmental Protection Agency § 429.111

(mill ponds or log ponds) or the storage

of logs or roundwood on land during

which water is sprayed or deposited in-

tentionally on the logs (wet decking).

§ 429.101 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30

through 125.32, any existing point

source subject to this subpart must

achieve the following effluent reduc-

tion attainable by the application of

the best practicable control technology

currently available (BPT): There shall

be no debris discharged and the pH

shall be within the range of 6.0 to 9.0

§ 429.102 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

§ 429.103 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30

through 125.32, any existing point

source subject to this subpart must

achieve the following effluent limita-

tions representing the degree of efflu-

ent reduction attainable by the appli-

cation of the best available technology

economically achievable (BAT): There

shall be no debris discharged and the

pH shall be within the range of 6.0 to

9.0.

§ 429.104 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Any new source subject to this sub-

part must achieve the following new

source performance standards (NSPS):

There shall be no debris discharged and

the pH shall be within the range of 6.0

to 9.0.

§ 429.105 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).

Any existing source subject to this

subpart which introduces process

wastewater pollutants into a publicly

owned treatment works must comply

with 40 CFR part 403.

§ 429.106 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).

Any new source subject to this sub-

part which introduces process waste-

water pollutants into a publicly owned

treatment works must comply with 40

CFR part 403.

Subpart J—Log Washing Subcategory

§ 429.110 Applicability; description of the log washing subcategory.

This subpart applies to discharges to

waters of the United States and to the

introduction of process wastewater pol-

lutants into publicly owned treatment

works from the log washing process in

which water under pressure is applied

to logs for the purpose of removing for-

eign material from the surface of the

log before further processing.

§ 429.111 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30

through 125.32, any existing point

source subject to this subpart must

achieve the following effluent limita-

tions representing the degree of efflu-

ent reduction attainable by the appli-

cation of the best practicable control

technology currently available (BPT):

There shall be no discharge of process

wastewater pollutants to navigable wa-

ters containing a total suspended solids

concentration greater than 50 mg/l and

the pH shall be within the range of 6.0

to 9.0.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 10:18 Aug 10, 2010 Jkt 220171 PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220171.XXX 220171WR

eier

-Avi

les

on D

SK

GB

LS3C

1PR

OD

with

CF

R

CATEGORY 429 ATTACHMENT F

410

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 440.10

440.102 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attain-able by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology (BPT).

440.103 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attain-able by the application of the best avail-able technology economically achievable (BAT).

440.104 New source performance standards (NSPS).

440.105 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attain-able by the application of the best con-ventional pollutant control technology (BCT). [Reserved]

Subpart K—Platinum Ores Subcategory

440.110 Applicability; description of the platinum ore subcategory.

440.111 [Reserved] 440.112 Effluent limitations representing

the degree of effluent reduction attain-able by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT). [Reserved]

440.113 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attain-able by the application of the best avail-able technology economically achievable (BAT).

440.114 New source performance standards (NSPS). [Reserved]

440.115 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attain-able by the application of the best con-ventional pollutant control technology (BCT). [Reserved]

Subpart L—General Provisions and Definitions

440.130 Applicability. 440.131 General provisions. 440.132 General definitions.

Subpart M—Gold Placer Mine Subcategory

440.140 Applicability; description of the gold placer mine subcategory.

440.141 Specialized definitions and provi-sions.

440.142 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attain-able by the application of the best prac-ticable control technology currently available (BPT).

440.143 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attain-able by the application of the best avail-able technology economically achievable (BAT).

440.144 New source performance standards (NSPS).

440.145–440.147 [Reserved] 440.148 Best Management Practices (BMP).

AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304(b), (c) and (e), 306, 307, and 501 of the Clean Water Act (The Fed-eral Water Pollution Control Act Amend-ments of 1972, as amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977 and the Water Quality Act of 1987), (the Act), 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1314(b), (c) and (e), 1316, 1317, and 1361; 86 Stat. 816, Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567, Pub. L. 95–217; 101 Stat. 7, Pub. L. 100–4.

SOURCE: 47 FR 54609, Dec. 3, 1982, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart A—Iron Ore Subcategory

§ 440.10 Applicability; description of the iron ore subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart A are applicable to discharges from (a) mines operated to obtain iron ore, regardless of the type of ore or its mode of occur-rence; (b) mills beneficiating iron ores by physical (magnetic and non-magnetic) and/or chemical separation; and (c) mills beneficiating iron ores by magnetic and physical separation in the Mesabi Range.

§ 440.11 [Reserved]

§ 440.12 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable after application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines operated to obtain iron ore shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Fe (dissolved) ........................ 2 .0 1 .0 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00420 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

411

Environmental Protection Agency § 440.13

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the concentration of pollutants discharged from mills that employ physical (magnetic and non-magnetic) and/or chemical methods to beneficiate iron ore shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Fe (dissolved) ........................ 2 .0 1 .0 pH .......................................... (1 ) (1 )

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(c)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, there shall be no dis-charge of process wastewater to navi-gable waters from mills that employ magnetic and physical methods to ben-eficiate iron ore in the Mesabi Range. The Agency recognizes that the elimi-nation of the discharge of pollutants to navigable waters may result in an in-crease in discharges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has consid-ered these impacts and has addressed them in the preamble published on De-cember 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equivalent to the difference between annual precipi-tation falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

§ 440.13 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best available technology economi-cally achievable (BAT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines operated to obtain iron ore shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Fe (dissolved) ............................ 2.0 1.0

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section the concentration of pollutants discharged from mills that employ physical (magnetic and non-magnetic) and/or chemical methods to beneficiate iron ore shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Fe (dissolved) ............................ 2.0 1.0

(c)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, there shall be no dis-charge of process wastewater to navi-gable waters from mills that employ magnetic and physical methods to ben-eficiate iron ore in the Mesabi Range. The Agency recognizes that the elimi-nation of the discharge of pollutants to navigable waters may result in an in-crease in discharges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has consid-ered these impacts and has addressed them in the preamble published on De-cember 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equal to the difference between annual precipita-tion falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00421 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

412

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 440.14

§ 440.14 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part, any new source subject to this subpart must achieve the fol-lowing NSPS representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by ap-plying the best available demonstrated technology (BADT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines operated to obtain iron ore shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Fe (dissolved) ............................ 2.0 1.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1) TSS ............................................ 30.0 20.0

1 Within the range of 6.0, to 9.0.

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the concentration of pollutants discharged from mills that employ physical (magnetic and non-magnetic) and/or chemical methods to beneficiate iron ore shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Fe (dissolved) ............................ 2.0 1.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1) TSS ............................................ 30.0 20.0

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(c)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, there shall be no dis-charge of process wastewater to navi-gable waters from mills that employ magnetic and physical methods to ben-eficiate iron ore in the Mesabi Range. The Agency recognizes that the elimi-nation of the discharge of pollutants to navigable waters may result in an in-crease in discharges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has consid-ered these impacts and has addressed them in the preamble published on De-cember 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-

cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equal to the difference between annual precipita-tion falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

§ 440.15 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

Subpart B—Aluminum Ore Subcategory

§ 440.20 Applicability; description of the aluminum ore subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart B are applicable to discharges from facilities engaged in the mining of bauxite as an aluminum ore.

§ 440.21 [Reserved]

§ 440.22 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing source subject to this subpart must achieve the fol-lowing effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT). The con-centration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines producing bauxite ores shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Fe .......................................... 1 .0 .5 A1 .......................................... 2 .0 1 .0 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00422 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

413

Environmental Protection Agency § 440.32

§ 440.23 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT). The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines producing bauxite ores shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Fe (total) .................................... 1.0 0.5 Al ............................................... 2.0 1.0

§ 440.24 New Source performance standards (NSPS).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part, any new source subject to this subpart must achieve the fol-lowing NSPS representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available dem-onstrated technology (BADT). The con-centration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines producting bauxite ores shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Fe (total) .................................... 1.0 0.5 Al ............................................... 2.0 1.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1) TSS ............................................ 30.0 20.0

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 440.25 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

Subpart C—Uranium, Radium and Vanadium Ores Subcategory

§ 440.30 Applicability; description of the uranium, radium and vanadium ores subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart C are applicable to discharges from (a) mines either open-pit or underground, from which uranium, radium and vanadium ores are produced; and (b) mills using the acid leach, alkaline leach, or com-bined acid and alkaline leach process for the extraction of uranium, radium and vanadium. Only vanadium byprod-uct production from uranium ores is covered under this subpart.

§ 440.31 [Reserved]

§ 440.32 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable after application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines, either open-pit or underground, from which uranium, radium and vana-dium ores are produced excluding mines using in-situ leach methods shall not exceed:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00423 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

414

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 440.33

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ................................................ 30 20 COD ............................................... 200 100 Zn .................................................. 1 .0 0 .5 Ra226 1 (dissolved) ....................... 10 3 Ra226 1 (total) ................................ 30 10 U .................................................... 4 2 pH .................................................. (2) (2)

1 Values in picocuries per liter (pCi/l). 2 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The concentrations of pollutants discharged from mills using the acid leach, alkaline leach or combined acid and alkaline leach process for the ex-traction of uranium, radium and vana-dium including mill-mine facilities and mines using in-situ leach methods shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS .............................................. 30 20 COD ............................................. .................... 500 As ................................................ 1 .0 .5 Zn ................................................ 1 .00 .5 Ra226 1 (dissolved) ..................... 10 3 Ra226 1 (total) .............................. 30 10 NH 3 ............................................. .................... 100 pH ................................................ (2) (2)

1 Values in picocuries per liter (pCi/l). 2 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 440.33 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines, either open-pit or underground, that produce uranium ore, including

mines using in-situ leach methods, shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily val-ues for 30 consecu-tive days

Milligrams per liter

COD ............................................. 200 100 Zn ................................................ 1 .00 .5 Ra226 1 (dissolved) ..................... 10 .0 3 .0 Ra226 1 (total) .............................. 30 .0 10 .0 U .................................................. 4 .0 2 .0

1 Values in picocuries per liter (pCi/l).

§ 440.34 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part any new source subject to this subpart must achieve the following NSPS representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best available dem-onstrated technology (BADT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines, either open-pit or underground, that produce uranium ore, excluding mines using in situ leach methods, shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

COD ....................................... 200 100 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 0 .5 Ra 1 226 (dissolved) ............... 10 .0 3 .0 Ra 1 226 (total) ....................... 30 .0 10 .0 U ............................................ 4 .0 2 .0 pH .......................................... (2) (2) TSS ........................................ 30 .0 20 .0

1 Values in picocuries per liter (pCi/l). 2 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b)(1) Except as provided in para-graph (b) of this section, there shall be no discharge of process wastewater to navigable waters from mills using the acid leach, alkaline leach or combined acid and alkaline leach process for the extraction of uranium or from mines and mills using in situ leach methods. The Agency recognizes that the elimi-nation of the discharge of pollutants to navigable waters may result in an in-crease in discharges of some pollutants

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00424 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

415

Environmental Protection Agency § 440.43

to other media. The Agency has consid-ered these impacts and has addressed them in the preamble published on De-cember 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equivalent to the difference between annual precipi-tation falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

§ 440.35 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

Subpart D—Mercury Ore Subcategory

§ 440.40 Applicability; description of the mercury ore subcategory.

The provisions of subpart D are appli-cable to discharges from (a) mines, ei-ther open-pit or underground, that produce mercury ores; and (b) mills beneficiating mercury ores by gravity separation methods or by froth-flota-tion methods.

§ 440.41 [Reserved]

§ 440.42 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable after application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines, either open-pit or underground, operated for the production of mercury

ores shall not exceed the following lim-itations:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Hg .......................................... .002 .001 Ni ........................................... .2 .1 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b)(1) Except as provided in para-graph (b) of this section, there shall be no discharge of process wastewater to navigable waters from mills beneficiating mercury ores by gravity separation methods or by froth flota-tion methods. The Agency recognizes that the elimination of the discharge of pollutants to navigable waters may re-sult in an increase in discharges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has considered these impacts and has addressed them in the pre-amble published on December 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equivalent to the difference between annual precipi-tation falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.

§ 440.43 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines, either open pit or underground,

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00425 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

416

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 440.44

that produce mercury ores shall not ex-ceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

MIligrams per liter

Hg .............................................. 0.002 0.001

(b)(1) Except as provided in para-graph (b) of this section, there shall be no discharge of process wastewater to navigable waters from mills beneficiating mercury ores by gravity separation methods or by froth-flota-tion methods. The Agency recognizes that the elimination of the discharge of pollutants to navigable waters may re-sult in an increase in discharges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has considered these impacts and has addressed them in the pre-amble published on December 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equal to the difference between annual precipita-tion falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

§ 440.44 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part any new source subject to this subpart must achieve the following NSPS representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best available dem-onstrated technology (BADT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines, either open pit or underground, that produce mercury ores shall not ex-ceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Hg .............................................. 0.002 0.001 pH .............................................. (1) (1) TSS ............................................ 30.0 20.0

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(b)(1) Except as provided in para-graph (b) of this section, there shall be no discharge of process wastewater to navigable waters from mills beneficiating mercury ores by gravity separation methods or by froth-flota-tion methods. The Agency recognizes that the elimination of the discharge of pollutants to navigable waters may re-sult in an increase in discharges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has considered these impacts and has addressed them in the pre-amble published on December 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equal to the difference between annual precipita-tion falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

§ 440.45 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

Subpart E—Titanium Ore Subcategory

§ 440.50 Applicability; description of the titanium ore subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart E are applicable to discharges from (a) mines obtaining titanium ores from lode de-posits; (b) mills beneficiating titanium ores by electrostatic methods, mag-netic and physical methods, or flota-tion methods; and (c) mines engaged in the dredge mining of placer deposits of

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00426 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

417

Environmental Protection Agency § 440.53

sands containing rutile, ilmenite, leucoxene, monazite, zircon, and other heavy metals, and the milling tech-niques employed in conjunction with the dredge mining activity (milling techniques employed include the use of wet gravity methods in conjunction with electrostatic or magnetic meth-ods).

§ 440.51 [Reserved]

§ 440.52 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable after application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines obtaining titanium ores from lode deposits shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Fe .......................................... 2 .0 1 .0 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills beneficiating ti-tanium ores by electrostatic methods, magnetic and physical methods, or flo-tation methods shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 Ni ........................................... .2 .1 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines engaged in the dredge mining of placer deposits of sands containing ru-tile, ilmenite, leucoxene, monazite, zircon, or other heavy metals, and the milling techniques employed in con-junction with the dredge mining activ-ity (milling techniques employed in-clude the use of wet gravity methods in conjunction with electrostatic or mag-netic methods) shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ............................................ 30 20 Fe .............................................. 2 1 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 440.53 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines obtaining titanium ores from lode deposits shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Fe .............................................. 2.0 1.0

(b) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills beneficiating ti-tanium ores by electrostatic methods, magnetic and physical methods, or flo-tation methods shall not exceed:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00427 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

418

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 440.54

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Zn .............................................. 1.0 0.5

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines engaged in the dredge mining of placer deposits of sands containing ru-tile, ilmenite, leucoxene, monazite, or zircon and the milling techniques em-ployed in conjunction with the dredge mining activity (milling techniques employed include the use of wet grav-ity methods in conjunction with elec-trostatic or magnetic methods) shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Fe .............................................. 2.0 1.0

§ 440.54 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part any new source subject to this subpart must achieve the following NSPS representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cations of the best available dem-onstrated technology (BADT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines obtaining titanium ores from lode deposits shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Fe .............................................. 2.0 1.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1) TSS ............................................ 30.0 20.0

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.1.

(b) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills beneficiating ti-tanium ores by electrostatic methods,

magnetic and physical methods, or flo-tation methods shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Zn .............................................. 1.0 0.5 pH .............................................. (1) (1) TSS ............................................ 30.0 20.0

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.1.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines engaged in the dredge mining of placer deposits of sands containing ru-tile, ilmenite, leucoxene, monazite, zircon and the milling techniques em-ployed in conjunction with the dredge mining activity (milling techniques employed include the use of wet grav-ity methods in conjunction with elec-trostatic or magnetic methods) shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Fe .............................................. 2.0 1.0 pH .............................................. (1) (1) TSS ............................................ 30.0 20.0

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.1.

§ 440.55 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

Subpart F—Tungsten Ore Subcategory

§ 440.60 Applicability; description of the tungsten ore subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart F are applicable to discharges from (a) mines that produce tungsten ore and (b) mills that process tungsten ore by either the gravity separation or froth-flotation methods.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00428 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

419

Environmental Protection Agency § 440.63

§ 440.61 [Reserved]

§ 440.62 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines producing 5000 metric tons (5512 short tons) or more of tungsten bearing ores per year shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 Cu .......................................... .3 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 Pb .......................................... .6 .3 As .......................................... 1 .0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines producing less than 5000 metric tons (5512 short tons) or discharged from mills processing less than 5000 metric tons (5512 short tons) of tung-sten ores per year by methods other than ore leaching shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ............................................ 50 30 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills processing 5000 metric tons (5512 short tons) or more of tungsten ores per year by purely phys-

ical methods including ore crushing, washing, jigging, heavy media separa-tion, and magnetic and electrostatic separation shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 Cu .......................................... .30 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 As .......................................... 1 .0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills processing 5000 metric tons (5512 short tons) or more of tungsten ores per year by froth flota-tion methods shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 Cu .......................................... .30 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 As .......................................... 1 .0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 440.63 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from tung-sten mines shall not exceed:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00429 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

420

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 440.64

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Cd .......................................... 0 .10 0 .05 Cu .......................................... 0 .30 0 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 0 .5

(b) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Cd .......................................... 0 .10 0 .05 Cu .......................................... 0 .3 0 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 0 .5

§ 440.64 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part any new source subject to this subpart must achieve the following NSPS representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best available dem-onstrated technology (BADT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from tung-sten mines shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Cd .......................................... 0 .10 0 .05 Cu .......................................... 0 .30 0 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1) TSS ........................................ 30 .0 20 .0

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Cd .......................................... 0 .10 0 .05 Cu .......................................... 0 .3 0 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1) TSS ........................................ 30 .0 20 .0

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 440.65 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

Subpart G—Nickel Ore Subcategory

§ 440.70 Applicability; description of the nickel ore subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart G are applicable to discharges from (a) mines that produce nickel ore and (b) mills that process nickel ore.

§ 440.71 [Reserved]

§ 440.72 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines producing 5000 metric tons (5512 short tons) or more of nickel bearing ores per year shall not exceed:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00430 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

421

Environmental Protection Agency § 440.82

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 Cu .......................................... .3 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 Pb .......................................... .6 .3 As .......................................... 1 .0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines producing less than 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) or discharged from mills processing less than 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) of nickel ores per year by methods other than ore leaching shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ............................................ 50 30 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills processing 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) or more of nickel ores per year by purely phys-ical methods including ore crushing, washing, jigging, heavy media separa-tion and magnetic and electrostatic separation shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 Cu .......................................... .30 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 As .......................................... 1 .0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills processing 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) or more of nickel ore per year by froth flotation methods shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 Cu .......................................... .30 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 As .......................................... 1 .0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 440.73 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT). [Reserved]

§ 440.74 New source performance standards (NSPS). [Reserved]

§ 440.75 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

Subpart H—Vanadium Ore Sub-category (Mined Alone and Not as a Byproduct)

§ 440.80 Applicability; description of the vanadium ore subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart H are applicable to discharges from (a) mines that produce vanadium ore (recovered alone and not as a by-product of ura-nium mining and mills) and (b) mills that process vanadium ore (recovered alone, not as a byproduct of uranium mining and mills).

§ 440.81 [Reserved]

§ 440.82 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00431 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

422

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 440.83

the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines producing 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) or more of vanadium bear-ing ores per year shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 Cu .......................................... .3 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 Pb .......................................... .6 .3 As .......................................... 1 .0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines producing less than 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) or discharged from mills processing less than 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) of vana-dium ore per year by methods other than ore leaching shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ............................................ 50 30 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(c) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills processing 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) or more of vanadium ores per year by purely physical methods including ore crush-ing, washing, jigging, heavy media sep-aration, and magnetic and electro-static separation shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 Cu .......................................... .30 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 As .......................................... 1 .0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(d) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills processing 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) or more of vanadium ores per year by froth flo-tation methods shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 Cu .......................................... .30 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 As .......................................... 1 .0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

§ 440.83 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT). [Reserved]

§ 440.84 New source performance standards (NSPS). [Reserved]

§ 440.85 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

Subpart I—Antimony Ore Subcategory

§ 440.90 Applicability; description of the antimony ore subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart I are applicable to discharges from (a) mines that produce antimony ore and (b) mills that process antimony ore.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00432 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

423

Environmental Protection Agency § 440.102

§ 440.91 [Reserved]

§ 440.92 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT). [Reserved]

§ 440.93 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT). [Reserved]

§ 440.94 New source performance standards (NSPS). [Reserved]

§ 440.95 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

Subpart J—Copper, Lead, Zinc, Gold, Silver, and Molyb-denum Ores Subcategory

§ 440.100 Applicability; description of the copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver, and molybdenum ores subcategory.

(a) The provisions of this subpart J are applicable to discharges from—

(1) Mines that produce copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver, or molybdenum bear-ing ores, or any combination of these ores from open-pit or underground op-erations other than placer deposits;

(2) Mills that use the froth-flotation process alone or in conjunction with other processes, for the beneficiation of copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver, or mo-lybdenum ores, or any combination of these ores;

(3) Mines and mills that use dump, heap, in-situ leach, or vat-leach proc-esses to extract copper from ores or ore waste materials; and

(4) Mills that use the cyanidation process to extract gold or silver.

(b) Discharge from mines or mines and mills that use gravity separation methods (including placer or dredge mining or concentrating operations, and hydraulic mining operations) to extract gold ores are regulated under subpart M.

(c) Discharge from mines (including placer or dredge mining, and hydraulic

mining operations) or mines and mills that use gravity separation methods to extract silver from placer ores are not covered under this part.

(d) The provisions of this subpart shall not apply to discharges from the Quartz Hill Molybdenum Project in the Tongass National Forest, Alaska.

[47 FR 54609, Dec. 3, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 18788, May 24, 1988]

§ 440.101 [Reserved]

§ 440.102 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology (BPT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines operated to obtain copper bear-ing ores, lead bearing ores, zinc bearing ores, gold bearing ores, or silver bear-ing ores, or any combination of these ores open-pit or underground oper-ations other than placer deposits shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cu .......................................... .30 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .5 .75 Pb .......................................... .6 .3 Hg .......................................... .002 .001 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills which employ the froth flotation process alone or in conjunction with other processes, for the beneficiation of copper ores, lead ores, zinc ores, gold ores, or silver ores, or any combination of these ores shall not exceed:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00433 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

424

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 440.102

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cu .......................................... .30 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 Pb .......................................... .6 .3 Hg .......................................... .002 .001 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(c)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, there shall be no dis-charge of process wastewater to navi-gable water from mines and mills which employ dump, heap, in situ leach or vat leach processes for the extrac-tion of copper from ores or ore waste materials. The Agency recognizes that the elimination of the discharge of pol-lutants to navigable waters may result in an increase in discharges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has considered these impacts and has addressed them in the preamble pub-lished on December 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equivalent to the difference between annual precipi-tation falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

(d)(1) Except as provided in para-graph (d) of this section, there shall be no discharge of process wastewater to navigable waters from mills which ex-tract gold or silver by use of the cyani-dation process. The Agency recognizes that the elimination of the discharge of pollutants to navigable waters may re-sult in an increase in discharges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has considered these impacts and has addressed them in the pre-amble published on December 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-

ration, a volume of water equivalent to the difference between annual precipi-tation falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

(e) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines producing 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) or more of molybdenum bearing ores per year shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 Cu .......................................... .3 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 Pb .......................................... .6 .3 As .......................................... 1 .0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0

(f) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines producing less than 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) or discharged from mills processing less than 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) of molyb-denum ores per year by methods other than ore leaching shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1

day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ............................................ 50 30 pH .............................................. (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(g) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills processing 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) or more of molybdenum ores per year by purely physical methods including ore crush-ing, washing, jigging, heavy media sep-aration shall not exceed:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00434 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

425

Environmental Protection Agency § 440.103

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily value for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 Cu .......................................... .30 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 As .......................................... 1 .0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0

(h) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills processing 5,000 metric tons (5,512 short tons) or more of molybdenum ores per year by froth flotation methods shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

TSS ........................................ 30 20 Cd .......................................... .10 .05 Cu .......................................... .30 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 .5 As .......................................... 1 .0 .5 pH .......................................... (1) (1)

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

[47 FR 54609, Dec. 3, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 18788, May 24, 1988]

§ 440.103 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best available technology economi-cally achievable (BAT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines that produce copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver, or molybdenum bearing ores or any combination of these ores from open-pit or underground oper-ations other than placer deposits shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Cu .......................................... 0 .30 0 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .5 0 .75 Pb .......................................... 0 .6 0 .3 Hg .......................................... 0 .002 0 .001 Cd .......................................... 0 .10 0 .05

(b) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills that use the froth-flotation process alone, or in con-junction with other processes, for the beneficiation of copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver, or molybdenum ores or any combination of these ores shall not ex-ceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Cu .......................................... 0 .30 0 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 0 .5 Pb .......................................... 0 .6 0 .3 Hg .......................................... 0 .002 0 .001 Cd .......................................... 0 .10 0 .05

(c)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, there shall be no dis-charge of process wastewater to navi-gable waters from mine areas and mills processes and areas that use dump, heap, in situ leach or vat-leach proc-esses to extract copper from ores or ore waste materials. The Agency recog-nizes that the elimination of the dis-charge of pollutants to navigable wa-ters may result in an increase in dis-charges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has considered these impacts and has addressed them in the preamble published on December 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equal to the difference between annual precipita-tion falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00435 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

426

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 440.104

and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

(d)(1) Except as provided in para-graph (d) of this section, there shall be no discharge of process wastewater to navigable waters from mills that use the cyanidation process to extract gold or silver. The Agency recognizes that the elimination of the discharge of pol-lutants to navigable waters may result in an increase in discharges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has considered these impacts and has addressed them in the preamble pub-lished on December 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equal to the difference between annual precipita-tion falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

[47 FR 54609, Dec. 3, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 18788, May 24, 1988]

§ 440.104 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part any new source subject to this subsection must achieve the following NSPS representing the degree of efflu-ent reduction attainable by the appli-cation of the best available dem-onstrated technology (BADT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines that produce copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver, or molybdenum bearing ores or any combination of these ores from open-pit or underground oper-ations other than placer deposits shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Cu .......................................... 0 .30 0 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .5 0 .75 Pb .......................................... 0 .6 0 .3 Hg .......................................... 0 .002 0 .001 Cd .......................................... 0 .10 0 .05 pH .......................................... (1) (1) TSS ........................................ 30 .0 20 .0

1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.

(b)(1) Except as provided in para-graph (b) of this section, there shall be no discharge of process wastewater to navigable waters from mills that use the froth-flotation process alone, or in conjunction with other processes, for the beneficiation of copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver, or molybdenum ores or any combination of these ores. The Agency recognizes that the elimination of the discharge of pollutants to navi-gable waters may result in an increase in discharges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has consid-ered these impacts and has addressed them in the preamble published on De-cember 3, 1982.

(2)(i) In the event that the annual precipitation falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equal to the difference between annual precipita-tion falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

(ii) In the event there is a build up of contaminants in the recycle water which significantly interferes with the ore recovery process and this inter-ference can not be eliminated through appropriate treatment of the recycle water, the permitting authority may allow a discharge of process waste-water in an amount necessary to cor-rect the interference problem after in-stallation of appropriate treatment. This discharge shall be subject to the limitations of paragraph (a) of this sec-tion. The facility shall have the burden of demonstrating to the permitting au-thority that the discharge is necessary

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00436 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

427

Environmental Protection Agency § 440.113

to eliminate interference in the ore re-covery process and that the inter-ference could not be eliminated through appropriate treatment of the recycle water.

(c)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, there shall be no dis-charge of process wastewater to navi-gable waters from mine areas and mills processes and areas that use dump, heap, in-situ leach or vat-leach proc-esses to extract copper from ores or ore waste materials. The Agency recog-nizes that the elimination of the dis-charge of pollutants to navigable wa-ters may result in an increase in dis-charges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has considered these impacts and has addressed them in the preamble published on December 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equal to the difference between annual precipita-tion falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

(d)(1) Except as provided in para-graph (d) of this section, there shall be no discharge of process wastewater to navigable waters from mills that use the cyanidation process to extract gold or silver. The Agency recognizes that the elimination of the discharge of pol-lutants to navigable waters may result in an increase in discharges of some pollutants to other media. The Agency has considered these impacts and has addressed them in the preamble pub-lished on December 3, 1982.

(2) In the event that the annual pre-cipitation falling on the treatment fa-cility and the drainage area contrib-uting surface runoff to the treatment facility exceeds the annual evapo-ration, a volume of water equal to the difference between annual precipita-tion falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing sur-face runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be dis-

charged subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

[47 FR 54609, Dec. 3, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 18788, May 24, 1988]

EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: Paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of § 440.104, published at 47 FR 54609, Dec. 3, 1982, contains information collection and recordkeeping equirements and will not be-come effective until approval has been given by the Office of Management and Budget.

§ 440.105 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BCT). [Re-served]

Subpart K—Platinum Ores Subcategory

§ 440.110 Applicability; description of the platinum ore subcategory.

The provisions of this subpart K are applicable to discharges from (a) mines that produce platinum ore and (b) mills that process platinum ore.

§ 440.111 [Reserved]

§ 440.112 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT). [Reserved]

§ 440.113 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in subpart L of this part and 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best available technology economi-cally achievable (BAT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in mine drainage from mines that produce platinum bearing ores from open-pit or underground op-erations other than placer deposits shall not exceed:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00437 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

428

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 440.114

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Cu .......................................... 0 .30 0 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .5 0 .75 Pb .......................................... 0 .6 0 .3 Hg .......................................... 0 .002 0 .001 Cd .......................................... 0 .10 0 .05

(b) The concentration of pollutants discharged from mills that use the froth-flotation process alone, or in con-junction with other processes, for the beneficiation of platinum ores shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristic

Effluent limitations

Maximum for any 1 day

Average of daily values for 30 con-

secutive days

Milligrams per liter

Cu .......................................... 0 .30 0 .15 Zn .......................................... 1 .0 0 .5 Pb .......................................... 0 .6 0 .3 Hg .......................................... 0 .002 0 .001 Cd .......................................... 0 .10 0 .05

§ 440.114 New source performance standards (NSPS). [Reserved]

§ 440.115 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best conventional pollut-ant control technology (BTC). [Re-served]

Subpart L—General Provisions and Definitions

§ 440.130 Applicability. Abbreviations and methods of anal-

ysis set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply to part 440 except as provided in these general provisions and defini-tions. The general provisions and defi-nitions in this subpart apply to all sub-parts of part 440 unless otherwise noted.

§ 440.131 General provisions. (a) Combined waste streams. In the

event that waste streams from various subparts or segments of subparts in part 440 are combined for treatment and discharge, the quantity and con-centration of each pollutant or pollut-

ant property in the combined discharge that is subject to effluent limitations shall not exceed the quantity and con-centration of each pollutant or pollut-ant property that could have been dis-charged had each waste stream been treated separately. In addition, the dis-charge flow from the combined dis-charge shall not exceed the volume that could have been discharged had each waste stream been treated sepa-rately.

(b) Storm exemption for facilities per-mitted to discharge. If, as a result of pre-cipitation or snowmelt, a source with an allowable discharge under 40 CFR part 440 has an overflow or excess dis-charge of effluent which does not meet the limitations of 40 CFR part 440, the source may qualify for an exemption from such limitations with respect to such discharge if the following condi-tions are met:

(1) The facility is designed, con-structed and maintained to contain the maximum volume of wastewater which would be generated by the facility dur-ing a 24-hour period without an in-crease in volume from precipitation and the maximum volume of waste-water resulting from a 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event or treat the max-imum flow associated with these vol-umes. In computing the maximum vol-ume of wastewater which would result from a 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event, the facility must include the volume which would result from all areas contributing runoff to the indi-vidual treatment facility, i.e., all run-off that is not diverted from the active mining area and runoff which is not di-verted from the mill area.

(2) The facility takes all reasonable steps to maintain treatment of the wastewater and minimize the amount of overflow.

(3) The facility complies with the no-tification requirements of § 122.60 (g) and (h). The storm exemption is de-signed to provide an affirmative de-fense to an enforcement action. There-fore, the operator has the burden of demonstrating to the appropriate au-thority that the above conditions have been met.

(c) Storm exemption for facilities not permitted to discharge. If, as a result of precipitation (rainfall or snowmelt), a

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00438 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

429

Environmental Protection Agency § 440.132

source which is not permitted to dis-charge under 40 CFR part 440, has an overflow or discharge which violates the limitations of 40 CFR part 440, the source may qualify for an exemption from such limitations with respect to such discharge if the following condi-tions are met:

(1) The facility is designed, con-structed, and maintained to contain the maximum volume of wastewater stored and contained by the facility during normal operating conditions without an increase in volume from precipitation and the maximum vol-ume of wastewater resulting from a 10- year, 24-hour precipitation event. In computing the maximum volume of wastewater which would result from a 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event, the facility must include the volume which would result from all areas con-tributing runoff to the individual treatment facility, i.e., all runoff that is not diverted from the area or process subject to zero discharge, and other runoff that is allowed to commingle with the influent to the treatment sys-tem.

(2) The facility takes all reasonable steps to minimize the overflow or ex-cess discharge.

(3) The facility complies with the no-tification requirements of § 122.60(g) and (h). The storm exemption is de-signed to provide an affirmative de-fense to an enforcement action. There-fore, the operator has the burden of demonstrating to the appropriate au-thority that the above conditions have been met.

(d) pH adjustment. (1) Where the appli-cation of neutralization and sedimenta-tion technology to comply with rel-evant metal limitations results in an inability to comply with the pH range of 6 to 9, the permit issuer may allow the pH level in the final effluent to slightly exceed 9.0 so that the copper, lead, zinc, mercury, and cadmium limi-tations will be achieved.

(2) In the case of a discharge into natural receiving waters for which the pH, if unaltered by human activities, is or would be less than 6.0 and approved water quality standards authorize such lower pH, the pH limitations for the discharge may be adjusted downward to the pH water quality criterion for

the receiving waters provided the other effluent limitations for the discharge are met. In no case shall a pH limita-tion below 5.0 be permitted.

(e) Groundwater infiltration provision. In the event a new source subject to a no discharge requirement can dem-onstrate that groundwater infiltration contributes a substantial amount of water to the tailing impoundment or wastewater holding facility, the per-mitting authority may allow the dis-charge of a volume of water equivalent to the amount of groundwater infiltra-tion. This discharge shall be subject to the limitations for mine drainage ap-plicable to the new source subcategory.

§ 440.132 General definitions. (a) ‘‘Active mining area’’ is a place

where work or other activity related to the extraction, removal, or recovery of metal ore is being conducted, except, with respect to surface mines, any area of land on or in which grading has been completed to return the earth to de-sired contour and reclamation work has begun.

(b) ‘‘Annual precipitation’’ and ‘‘an-nual evaporation’’ are the mean annual precipitation and mean annual lake evaporation, respectively, as estab-lished by the U.S. Department of Com-merce, Environmental Science Services Administration, Environmental Data Services, or equivalent regional rain-fall and evaporation data.

(c) ‘‘Appropriate treatment of the re-cycle water’’ in subpart J, § 440.104 in-cludes, but is not limited to pH adjust-ment, settling and pH adjustment, set-tling, and mixed media filtration.

(d) ‘‘Groundwater infiltration’’ in § 440.131 means that water which enters the treatment facility as a result of the interception of natural springs, aquifers, or run-off which percolates into the ground and seeps into the treatment facility’s tailings pond or wastewater holding facility and that cannot be diverted by ditching or grouting the tailings pond or waste-water holding facility.

(e) ‘‘In-situ leach methods’’ means the processes involving the purposeful introduction of suitable leaching solu-tions into a uranium ore body to dis-solve the valuable minerals in place and the purposeful leaching of uranium

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00439 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

430

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 440.140

ore in a static or semistatic condition either by gravity through an open pile, or by flooding a confined ore pile. It does not include the natural dissolu-tion of uranium by ground waters, the incidental leaching of uranium by mine drainage, nor the rehabilitation of aquifiers and the monitoring of these aquifiers.

(f) ‘‘Mill’’ is a preparation facility within which the metal ore is cleaned, concentrated, or otherwise processed before it is shipped to the customer, re-finer, smelter, or manufacturer. A mill includes all ancillary operations and structures necessary to clean, con-centrate, or otherwise process metal ore, such as ore and gangue storage areas and loading facilities.

(g) ‘‘Mine’’ is an active mining area, including all land and property placed under, or above the surface of such land, used in or resulting from the work of extracting metal ore or min-erals from their natural deposits by any means or method, including sec-ondary recovery of metal ore from refuse or other storage piles, wastes, or rock dumps and mill tailings derived from the mining, cleaning, or con-centration of metal ores.

(h) ‘‘Mine drainage’’ means any water drained, pumped, or siphoned from a mine.

(i) ‘‘Ten (10)-year, 24-hour precipita-tion event’’ is the maximum 24-hour precipitation event with a probable re-currence interval of once in 10 years as established by the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and At-mospheric Administration, National Weather Service, or equivalent re-gional or rainfall probability informa-tion.

(j) ‘‘U’’ (Uranium) is measured by the procedure discussed in 40 CFR 141.25(b)(2), or an equivalent method.

Subpart M—Gold Placer Mine Subcategory

SOURCE: 53 FR 18788, May 24, 1988, unless otherwise noted.

§ 440.140 Applicability; description of the gold placer mine subcategory.

(a) The provisions of this subpart M are applicable to discharges from—

(1) Mines and dredges that produce gold or gold bearing ores from placer deposits; and

(2) The beneficiation processes which use gravity separation methods for re-covering gold from placer deposits.

(b) The provisions of this subpart M are not applicable to any mines or beneficiation processes which process less than 1500 cubic yards (cu yd) of ore per year, or to dredges which process less than 50,000 cu yd of ore per year, or to dredges located in open waters (i.e., open bays, marine waters, or major riv-ers).

§ 440.141 Specialized definitions and provisions.

For the purpose of this subpart M, the general definitions, abbreviations, methods of analysis, and general provi-sions set forth in 40 CFR part 401 shall apply except as superseded by those below. The general provisions and defi-nitions set forth in 40 CFR part 440, subpart L, shall not apply to this sub-part.

(a) Specialized definitions. The fol-lowing specialized definitions apply to this subpart only.

(1) ‘‘Beneficiation area’’ means the area of land used to stockpile ore im-mediately before the beneficiation process, the area of land used for the beneficiation process, the area of land used to stockpile the tailings imme-diately after the beneficiation process, and the area of land from the stock-piled tailings to the treatment system (e.g., holding pond or settling pond, and the area of the treatment system).

(2) ‘‘Beneficiation process’’ means the dressing or processing of gold bearing ores for the purpose of—

(i) Regulating the size of, or recov-ering, the ore or product,

(ii) Removing unwanted constituents from the ore, and

(iii) Improving the quality, purity, or assay grade of a desired product.

(3) ‘‘Drainage water’’ means inci-dental surface waters from diverse sources such as rainfall, snow melt or permafrost melt.

(4) ‘‘Dredge’’ means a self-contained combination of an elevating excavator (e.g., bucket line dredge), the beneficiation or gold-concentrating

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00440 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

431

Environmental Protection Agency § 440.141

plant, and a tailings disposal plant, all mounted on a floating barge.

(5) ‘‘Five (5) year, 6-hour precipita-tion event’’ means the maximum 6- hour precipitation event with a prob-able recurrence interval of once in 5 years as established by the U.S. De-partment of Commerce, National Oce-anic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, or equiva-lent regional or rainfall probability in-formation.

(6) ‘‘Gravity separation methods’’ means the treatment of mineral par-ticles which exploits differences be-tween their specific gravities. The sep-aration is usually performed by means of sluices, jigs, classifiers, spirals, hydrocyclones, or shaking tables.

(7) ‘‘Infiltration water’’ means that water which permeates through the earth into the plant site.

(8) ‘‘Mine’’ means a place where work or other activity related to the extrac-tion or recovery of ore is performed.

(9) ‘‘Mine area’’ means the land area from which overburden is stripped and ore is removed prior to moving the ore to the beneficiation area.

(10) ‘‘Mine drainage’’ means any water drained, pumped or siphoned from a mine.

(11) ‘‘New water’’ means water from any discrete source such as a river, creek, lake or well which is delib-erately allowed or brought into the plant site.

(12) ‘‘Open cut mine’’ means any form of recovery of ore from the earth ex-cept by a dredge.

(13) ‘‘Ore’’ means gold placer deposit consisting of metallic gold-bearing gravels, which may be: residual, from weathering of rocks in-situ; river grav-els in active streams; river gravels in abandoned and often buried channels; alluvial fans; sea-beaches; and sea- beaches now elevated and inland. Ore is the raw ‘‘bank run’’ material measured in place, before being moved by me-chanical or hydraulic means to a beneficiation process.

(14) ‘‘Permit area’’ means the area of land specified or referred to in an NPDES permit in which active mining and related activities may occur that result in the discharge regulated under the terms of the permit. Usually this is specifically delineated in an NPDES

permit or permit application, but in other cases may be ascertainable from an Alaska Tri-agency permit applica-tion or similar document specifying the mine location, mining plan and similar data.

(15) ‘‘Plant site’’ means the area oc-cupied by the mine, necessary haulage ways from the mine to the beneficiation process, the beneficiation area, the area occupied by the waste-water treatment facilities and the stor-age areas for waste materials and sol-ids removed from the wastewaters dur-ing treatment.

(16) ‘‘Process wastewater’’ means all water used in and resulting from the beneficiation process, including but not limited to the water used to move the ore to and through the beneficiation process, the water used to aid in classi-fication, and the water used in gravity separation, mine drainage, and infiltra-tion and drainage waters which com-mingle with mine drainage or waters resulting from the beneficiation proc-ess.

(17) ‘‘Settleable solids’’ means the particulate material (both organic or inorganic) which will settle in one hour expressed in milliliters per liter (ml/l) as determined using an Imhoff cone and the method described for Residue— Settleable in 40 CFR part 136.

(b) Specialized provisions—storm exemp-tion. This specialized provision applies to this subpart M only. If, as a result of precipitation (rainfall or snowmelt), a source subject to this subpart has an overflow or discharge of effluent which does not meet the limitations or stand-ards of this subpart, the source may qualify for an exemption from such limitations and standards with respect to such discharge if the following con-ditions are met:

(1) The treatment system is designed, constructed, and maintained to contain the maximum volume of untreated process wastewater which would be dis-charged, stored, contained and used or recycled by the beneficiation process into the treatment system during a 4- hour operating period without an in-crease in volume from precipitation or infiltration, plus the maximum volume of water runoff resulting from a 5-year, 6-hour precipitation event. In com-puting the maximum volume of water

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00441 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

432

40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–07 Edition) § 440.142

which would result from a 5-year, 6- hour precipitation event, the operator must include the volume which would result from the plant site contributing runoff to the individual treatment fa-cility.

(2) The operator takes all reasonable steps to maintain treatment of the wastewater and minimize the amount of overflow.

(3) The source is in compliance with the BMP in § 140.148 and related provi-sions of its NPDES permit.

(4) The operator complies with the notification requirements of § 122.41 (m) and (n) of this title. The storm exemp-tion is designed to provide an affirma-tive defense to an enforcement action. Therefore, the operator has the burden of demonstrating to the appropriate authority that the above conditions have been met.

§ 440.142 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30– 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT):

(a) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process wastewater from an open-cut mine plant site shall not exceed:

Effluent limitations

Effluent characteristics Instantaneous maximum

Settleable solids .......................................... 0.2 ml/l

(b) The concentration of pollutants discharged in process wastewater from a dredge plant site shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limita-tions—Instanta-

neous max-imum

Settleable solids .......................................... 0.2 ml/l

§ 440.143 Effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the applica-tion of the best available tech-nology economically achievable (BAT).

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30– 125.32, any existing point source sub-ject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations rep-resenting the degree of effluent reduc-tion attainable by the application of the best available technology economi-cally achievable (BAT).

(a) The volume of process wastewater which may be discharged from an open- cut mine plant site shall not exceed the volume of infiltration, drainage and mine drainage waters which is in ex-cess of the make up water required for operation of the beneficiation process. The concentration of pollutants in process wastewaters discharged from an open-cut mine plant site shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limita-tions—Instanta-

neous max-imum

Settleable solids .......................................... 0.2 ml/l

(b) The volume of process wastewater which may be discharged from a dredge plant site shall not exceed the volume of infiltration, drainage and mine drainage waters which is in excess of the make up water required for oper-ation of the beneficiation process. The concentration of pollutants in process wastewater discharged from a dredge plant site shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limita-tions—Instanta-

neous max-imum

Settleable solids .......................................... 0.2 ml/l

§ 440.144 New source performance standards (NSPS).

Any new source subject to this sub-part must achieve the following NSPS representing the degree of effluent re-duction attainable by the application of the best available demonstrated technology:

(a) The volume of process wastewater which may be discharged from an open- cut mine plant site shall not exceed the volume of infiltration, drainage and

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00442 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F

433

Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 442

mine drainage waters which is in ex-cess of the make up water required for operation of the beneficiation process. The concentration of pollutants in process wastewaters discharged from an open-cut mine plant site shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limita-tions—Instanta-

neous max-imum

Settleable solids .......................................... 0.2 ml/l

(b) The volume of process wastewater which may be discharged from a dredge plant site shall not exceed the volume of infiltration, drainage and mine drainage waters which is in excess of the make up water required for oper-ation of the beneficiation process. The concentration of pollutants in process wastewater discharged from a dredge plant site shall not exceed:

Effluent characteristics

Effluent limita-tions—Instanta-

neous max-imum

Settleable solids .......................................... 0.2 ml/l

(c) Notwithstanding any other provi-sion of this chapter, the Regional Ad-ministrator or Director of a State agency with authority to administer the NPDES program shall in desig-nating new source gold placer mines, take into account and base the decision on whether one or more of the fol-lowing factors has occurred after May 24, 1988.

(1) The mine will operate outside of the permit area which is covered by a currently valid NPDES Permit.

(2) The mine significantly alters the nature or quantity of pollutants dis-charged.

(3) The mine discharges into a stream into which it has not discharged under its currently valid NPDES permit.

(4) The mine will operate in a permit area that has not been mined during the term of the currently valid NPDES permit.

(5) Such other factors as the Regional Administrator or state Director deems relevant.

§§ 440.145–440.147 [Reserved]

§ 440.148 Best Management Practices (BMP).

The following best management prac-tices are specific requirements which shall be included in each NPDES per-mit for all mining operations regulated under this subpart to the greatest ex-tent applicable in each such mining op-eration.

(a) Surface water diversion: The flow of surface waters into the plant site shall be interrupted and these waters di-verted around and away from incursion into the plant site.

(b) Berm construction: Berms, includ-ing any pond walls, dikes, low dams and similar water retention structures shall be constructed in a manner such that they are reasonably expected to reject the passage of water.

(c) Pollutant materials storage: Meas-ures shall be taken to assure that pol-lutant materials removed from the process water and wastewater streams will be retained in storge areas and not discharged or released to the waters of the United States.

(d) New water control: The amount of new water allowed to enter the plant site for use in ore processing shall be limited to the minimum amount re-quired as make-up water for processing operations.

(e) Maintenance of water control and solids retention devices: All water con-trol devices such as diversion struc-tures and berms and all solids reten-tion structures such as berms, dikes, pond structures and dams shall be maintained to continue their effective-ness and to protect from unexpected and catastrophic failure.

PART 442—TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT CLEANING POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

Sec. 442.1 General applicability. 442.2 General definitions. 442.3 General pretreatment standards.

Subpart A—Tank Trucks and Intermodal Tank Containers Transporting Chem-ical and Petroleum Cargos

442.10 Applicability.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 11:16 Sep 13, 2007 Jkt 211170 PO 00000 Frm 00443 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211170.XXX 211170yshi

vers

on

PR

OD

1PC

66 w

ith C

FR

CATEGORY 440 ATTACHMENT F