EFFECTS OF FEED PROCESSING FOR THE REDUCTION OF ...deag.ufcg.edu.br/rbpa//rev151/Art1519.pdf ·...
Transcript of EFFECTS OF FEED PROCESSING FOR THE REDUCTION OF ...deag.ufcg.edu.br/rbpa//rev151/Art1519.pdf ·...
Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.15, n.1, p.81-92, 2013 81 ISSN 1517-8595
EFFECTS OF FEED PROCESSING FOR THE REDUCTION OF
MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION IN THE FINAL PRODUCT
Paulo Carteri Coradi1, Adílio Flauzino de Lacerda Filho
2, José Benício Paes Chaves
3,
Evandro de Castro Melo4
ABSTRACT
The objective of the present study is to survey the microbiological indexes and to evaluate the
effects of feed processing in the reduction of present contamination in raw materials and
feedstuffs of a feed mill unit with production capacity of 1,000 ton.day-1, located in the State of
Minas Gerais, at Southwest Brazil. In order to evaluate samples of products samples were
collected from different points of the equipment surfaces and along the flow of feed production.
The Aspergillus candidus (3.7x105), Penicillium duclauxii (4.6x105), the Clostridia perfringens
(1.6x105), Listeria monocytogenes (6.1x103) and Escherichia coli (2.4x103) were the
microbiological contamination most detected on the surface of equipments. Moreover, the
higher contamination indexes (100% of contaminated samples) occurred in the silos of
expedition and trucks of feed transport. Furthermore, during the feed production steps the
microbiological contamination decreased from 5.3x105 to 0.2x101 in the final product. The
microbiological contamination identified in the production flow characterized by the materials,
equipment, machinery used in formulating the feed. Positively, the processing of feed,
especially the pelletizing step, reduced microbiological contamination in the final products.
Keywords: corn, feed, soybean meal, and quality.
EFEITOS DO PROCESSAMENTO DA RAÇÃO NA REDUÇÃO DA CONTAMINAÇÃO
MICROBIOLÓGICA NO PRODUTO FINAL
RESUMO
Neste estudo o objetivo foi realizar um levantamento dos índices de contaminação
microbiológica e avaliar os efeitos das etapas de processamento da ração na redução da
contaminação presente nas matérias-prima e rações processadas de uma fábrica de ração, com
capacidade de produção de 1.000 ton.dia-1
,localizado no Estado de Minas Gerais, Sudoeste do
Brasil. Para a realização deste trabalho coletaram-se amostras de produtos nas superfícies dos
equipamentos e no fluxo de produção da ração. Aspergillus candidus (3.7x105), Penicillium
duclauxii (4.6x105), Clostridia perfringens (1.6x10
5), Listeria monocytogenes (6.1x10
3) e
Escherichia coli (2.4x103) foram os micro-organismos mais identificados na superfície dos
equipamentos. Além disso, os índices mais elevados de contaminação (100% de amostras
contaminadas) ocorreram nos silos de expedição e nos caminhões de transporte da ração.
Acrescenta-se que, durante as etapas de produção da ração, houve diminuição da contaminação
microbiológica de 5.3x105 para 0.2x10
1 no produto final. Ressalta-se que a contaminação
microbiológica identificada no fluxo de produção foi caracterizada pelo conjunto de materiais,
equipamentos e máquinas utilizados na formulação de ração. Positivamente, o processamento
das rações, especialmente a etapa de peletização, tem função importante na redução da
contaminação microbiológica dos produtos finais (0.2x101).
Palavras-chave: milho, ração, farelo de soja e qualidade.
Protocolo 14-2012-14 de 15/06/2012 1 Professor Adjunto I, Doutor, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campus de Chapadão do Sul,
Chapadão do Sul, MS, [email protected], (67) 3562-6300 2 Professor Associado II, Doutor, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola, Viçosa,
MG, [email protected], (31) 3899-1872. 3 Professor Titular, Doutor, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Departamento de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Viçosa, MG,
[email protected], (31) 3899-1758. 4 Professor Associado I, Doutor, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola, Viçosa,
MG, [email protected], (31) 3899-1873.
82 Effects of the feed processing in the reduction of the microbiological contamination on the final product Coradi et al.
Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.15, n.1, p.81-92, 2013
INTRODUCTION
Brazilian agribusinesses had representativeness
in the international trade, with 35% of chicken
production. In the international context Brazil is
the third largest producer of foods balanced for
animals, behind only the United States and
China, and the largest producers at Latin
America with 50% of the production
(Sindirações, 2008). Today for businesses to
survive on the market competition, they must
differentiate themselves by pursuing better
alternatives. The application of quality
improvement concepts allows businesses to
better participate in the dispute for market
share, since both markets and clients are
demanding higher standards for products and
services, stimulating the continuous evolution
of processes (Henson et al., 1999; Unnevehr, et
al., 2000; Maldonado et al; 2005; Coradi et al.,
2010b). Cereal grains and associated by-
products constitute important sources of energy
and protein for all classes of farm livestock,
however, when cereal grains and animal feed
are colonized by fungi and bacteria there is a
significant mycotoxins production risk,
affecting the animals and humans productivity.
Many species of Fusarium, Aspergillus,
Penicillium and Alternaria are not only
recognized plant pathogens but are also sources
of the important mycotoxins of concern in
animal and human health (Tabib, 1981; Henson
et al., 1999; Unnevehr, et al., 2000; Maldonado
et al; 2005). Bacterial contamination of animal
feed is another important point and it must be
controlled, as infection and colonization of
livestock and poultry with these pathogens can
be transmitted later to humans causing human
food-borne illness (Hinton, 2004; Roberts et al.,
1995). Animal feed is thus an important early
link in the “farm-to-fork model” chain of food
safety. Two anaerobic Clostridia sp. are of
major concern in feed, Cl. perfringens and Cl.
botulinum. Cl. perfringens has been linked to
bloating (gastric dilatation) in primates and
necrotic enteritis in poultry (Annett et al.,
2002). Listeria sp. is an invasive
microorganism that has been reported to cause
abortions, encephalitis and septicemia in
ruminants (Veldman, 1995; Annett et al., 2002).
E. coli strains are normal components of animal
and human intestinal microflora, and thus serve
as an indicator of fecal contamination in feed
(Geornaras et al., 2001). Salmonella sp. is
estimated to be the third most common cause of
human food borne illness (Curtain, 1984;
Tauxe, 2002). Despite the importance of plant-
protein as a main ingredient in animal feed,
there are very few studies in the literature that
focus on the prevalence and risk factors for
microbiological contamination of plant protein
in animal feed. Previous studies have verified
the mycobiota formation in final poultry feed
(Diener et al., 1987; Rotter et al., 1996;
Weidenborner, 2001; Eriksen & Pettersson,
2004; Coradi et al., 2011c). Most poultry feeds
are prone to fungal and bacterial growth during
different stages of the manufacturing process.
Thus, the study had as objective to survey and
quantifies the distribution of the
microbiological contamination indexes presents
in the feed mill and to verify the effects of the
processing system in the reduction of the
contamination in the final feed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Characterization of the feed processing unit
The experiment was conducted at a poultry feed
facility with capacity of production of 1,000
ton.day-1
located at Minas Gerais State,
Southwest at Brazil. The feed mill includes a
parking area for grain trucks, and also a
weighing system of raw materials by automatic
scale systems. The unloading of bulk products
(corn and soybean meal) are performed in
separated hoppers, while a manual system is
utilized for individual units of sacked raw
materials. The grain pre-cleaning system
consists of an air machine and sieves with a
capacity of 60 ton.h-1
in which light impurities
are removed. The impurities and damaged
grains are separated in the sieves based on
different formats, according to the perforation
standards of the sieves and the quality standards
adopted by the industry. The grain drying is
performed in a continuous flow dryer with a
nominal capacity of 60 ton.h-1
. The product is
transported within the mill by bucket elevators,
belt conveyers and screw augers. Storage units
consist of metallic silos with capacities of 1,200
tons and 2,100 tons. On the corn storage there
are composts with silos of capacities of 200
tons each, and used during the highest harvest
point in the final drying of products. Soybean
meal is stored in cement and metallic silos with
capacities of 350 tons and 100 tons,
respectively. Micro ingredients, including
metionina, lysine, lime, salt, sodium
bicarbonate, premixes, vitamins, and rice,
wheat, and animals meals are stored in an
internal area of the mill. Weighing of these
ingredients is done manually and they are
Effects of the feed processing in the reduction of the microbiological contamination on the final product Coradi et al. 83
Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.15, n.1, p.81-92, 2013
mixed in a pre-mixer machine. The ingredient
mixing system is composed of a pre-mixer,
mixers, and a hopper bin, with a capacity for
4,000 kg. The system is operated and controlled
automatically by a computer. Weighing and
addition of ingredients is done in a hopper for
receiving, doser and doser bins, oil (fat) tanks
and a weighing scale. The control system is
automatic and computerized for addition of the
following products: soybean meal, wheat meal,
corn germ, feather, visceral and meat meals and
visceral oils according to the specific feed
recipe. After weighing and the addition of the
ingredients, the products are ground
simultaneously. The grinding system is
composed of hammer mills with a rated power
of 128.0 kW. Pelletization is performed with
pelletizers presenting capacities of 25 tons,
operating at a temperature and pressure of 73ºC
and 75 KPa, respectively. After formation, the
pellets are cooled to remove excess moisture
and heat. The loading system of feed is in bulk,
utilizing hopper bins and storage silos with
capacities of 60 tons. Discharge is done directly
in bulk feed trucks. The entire product
transportation system in the feed mill is
continuous. The grains, soybean meal, and
other meals arrive at the feed mills by means of
bulk trucks. Wheat and rice meals, as well as
other micro ingredients such as premixes and
vitamins are transported to the mill in trucks
suited for transport of sacked feeds. The base
quantities of ingredients used to the poultry
feed formulation is presented in the Table 1.
Table 1. Percentage of ingredients used in the
feed formulation for poultry
Ingredients Quantities of products
(%)
Corn 64.387
Soybean meal 26.994
Animal meals 4.847
Soybean oil 1.554
Limestone 1.035
Salt 0.359
Methionine 0.206
Lysine 0.118
Vitamin-mineral 0.500
Total 100.00
Sampling of the products
In the equipments of weighing of macros and
micros ingredients, hopper, pre-cleaning,
drying, storage silos, auger conveyers, belt
conveyers, buckets elevators, mixer, milling,
pelletizer, cooler, silos of expedition, and truck
to transport of feed were collected swab
samples. The collected of samples was realized
with the passage sterile swab over an area of
100 m2 of equipment surface using the open
mold properly sanitized to demarcate the area.
Each equipment fourth samples were collected
and distributed in different points. After
sampling, the swab was put in a tube and
covered with solution, identified and
conditioned in a special box and sent to
microbiological analysis. A total of 252
samples were collected (88 samples in the flow
corn production, 60 samples in the flow
soybean meal production, and 108 samples in
the flow feed production). Samples of corn and
soybean meal were collected in the receiving
sector (unload truck). In total 70 trucks were
sampled, and in each truck was collected
approximately 15 kg of products distributed in
different points of the mass, and reduced it to 1
kg for analysis. In addition, samples of animal
meals (54 visceral samples, 51 feathers
samples, 57 bone samples, and 44 meat
samples) were collected in the truck unload,
during the running mill. Samples of 1 kg were
collected in the sectors of grinding (40
samples), mixing (40 samples), mash (40
samples), and pellet (40 samples) feed.
Water content
For determination of water content in animal
meals, and feed were performed the weighing
of the capsules, previously cleaned and dried in
an oven at 105 ºC for one hour and cooled in a
desiccator until room temperature. A sample of
5 g was weighed and placed in an oven
preheated to 103 ºC ± 2 ºC until constant weight
(4 hours). After this time, the container was
removed from the oven, cooled in a desiccator
until equilibrium with the ambient temperature,
and held the weight (Brasil, 1993). The water
content of corn (% w.b.) was determined by
indirect method, using the meter moisture
Geole (G-800) after being calibrated with the
official from the oven, set at 103 ºC ± 2 ºC for
24 h. Tests were performed with samples of 50
g in three replicates, according to
recommendations contained in Rule for Seed
Analysis (Brasil, 1992).
Microbiological analyses
The mains fungi of the genus Fusarium sp. (F.
moniliforme, and F. proliferatum) Aspergillus
sp. (A. candidus, and A. flavus) and Penicillium
sp. (P. duclauxii, and P. funiculosum) were
84 Effects of the feed processing in the reduction of the microbiological contamination on the final product Coradi et al.
Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.15, n.1, p.81-92, 2013
isolated, enumerated and identified. The
samples were diluted in 225 ml of distilled
water, sterilized for dilutions. In each one of the
dilutions, brackets of 0.1 ml were transferred to
Petri plates with the culture middle Ágar Pink
Dicloran of Cloranfenicol Bengala (APDCB)
(Taniwaki, 1996). The colonies grew in room
temperature at 28 ºC ± 1 ºC for 72 hours. After
the incubation period, counting of the colonies
(CFU.g-1) was done (Lacaz et al. 1991). The
fungi identifications were accomplished with a
base in the microscopic aspect of the colonies
with description of the colonies in half Ágar
Czapeck, Ágar Batata Dextrose and Ágar
Extract of Malt (Lacaz et al. 1991). Salmonella
sp. was analyses using the general method
described by the American Public Health
Association American Public Health
Association-APHA (Speck, 1984). The
methodology for sample preparation was the
same as described for the analysis of fungi. The
material was incubated at 370 ºC in a
bacteriological incubator for 18 hours as pre-
enrichment, for the initial isolation of
Salmonella sp. Aliquots of 1 ml pre-enriched
sample were inoculated in Muller Kauffmann
tetrathionate broth (TMK) and incubated at 370
ºC for 18 h for quantification.The black E. coli.
colonies were identified by E.C. tubes with gas
using agar plates and Eosin Methylene Blue-
EMB (35 ºC ± 1 ºC for 24 hours). For Listeria
monocytogenes analyses a serving of 25 grams
of sample was weighed and homogenized in
225 ml of LEB broth (Listeria Enrichment
Broth, UVM formulation, Oxoid) and incubated
at 30 ºC for 24 hours. The 0.1 ml of this
material was transferred into a tube containing
10 ml of Fraser Broth (Oxoid), which was
incubated at 37 ºC for 24 hours. The blackened
Fraser Broths were plated on agar Palcan and
Oxford (both Oxoid), and incubated at 37 ºC for
24 hours. The colonies of Listeria
monocytogenes were transferred to trypticase
soy agar plates supplemented with 0.6% yeast
extract (TSA-YE, both Oxoid) to verify its
purity. The count of Clostridium perfringens
was performed in culture medium base Broth
Trypcase Modified Soybeans-BTMS for one
gram of sample. After, 10 ml of the suspension
material were seeded in the BTMS. The plates
were incubated under anaerobic conditions for
20h at 35-37ºC. All the analysis was performed
in three replicates. The results were analyses by
frequency (%) of samples contaminated, and
the counting by the Colony Forming Units
(CFU.g-1) of bacteria and fungi were calculated
by the number of samples evaluated.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The contamination of raw materials in the
production flow made the process even more
burdensome to industry. In general, fungi
promoted significant damage to feedstuffs, and
among the many important fungi for the poultry
industry are Fusarium sp., Aspergillus sp., and
Penicillium sp. growing prior during field and
after the during storage. These fungi species
affected the quality, altered the physical
conditions of the products and reduced the
nutritional values. However, the
microbiological contamination in the feed mill
often does not occur only by using materials of
low quality, but also by contamination present
on the equipments of the production flow, as
observed in the Tables 2, 3, and 4.
Table 2. Counts of fungi and bacteria species on the equipment surfaces of the feed mill
Types of fungi
and bacteria
Sectors of corn
production
Sectors of soybean
meal production
Sectors of feed
production
(CFU.g-1
) (CFU.g-1
) (CFU.g-1
)
Fusarium moniliforme 1.6x102 1.0x10
1 2.2x10
2
Fusarium proliferatum 1.4x103 1.1x10
1 3.6x10
1
Aspergillus flavus 2.5x104 1.6x10
2 2.8x10
3
Aspergillus candidus 3.7x105 1.7x10
2 4.1x10
4
Penicillium duclauxii 4.6x105 1.2x10
2 5.2x10
4
Penicillium funiculosum 6.2x104 1.4x10
2 3.7x10
4
Clostridia perfringens 1.6x105 2.2x10
3 2.7x10
3
Listeria monocytogenes 1.4x103 3.1x10
2 6.1x10
3
Escherichia coli 2.5x102 1.7x10
1 2.4x10
3
Salmonellas sp. 3.7x102 1.0x10
1 1.2x10
2
Effects of the feed processing in the reduction of the microbiological contamination on the final product Coradi et al. 85
Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.15, n.1, p.81-92, 2013
Table 3. Frequency of samples fungi contaminated in the flow production of the feed mill
Sampling
Frequencya (%)
F.
moniliforme
F.
proliferatum
A.
flavus
A.
candidus
P.
duclauxii
P.
funiculosum
Cornb
Buckets elevators 4 (33.3) 5 (41.7) 8 (66.7) 7 (58.3) 9 (75.0) 6 (50.0)
Auger conveyers 10 (50.0) 12 (60.0) 14 (70.0) 11 (55.0) 15 (75.0) 7 (35.0)
Belt conveyers 15 (62.5) 16 (66.7) 20 (83.3) 24 (100.0) 18 (75.0) 21 (87.5)
Weighing 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0)
Hopper 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0)
Pre-cleaning 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0)
Drying 1 (75.0) 1 (75.0) 3 (75.0) 3 (75.0) 2 (50.00 3 (75.0)
Storage silos 6 (37.5) 10 (62.5) 14 (87.5) 15 (93.7) 12 (75.0) 11 (68.7)
Soybean mealc
Buckets elevators 0 (0.0) 1 (12.5) 1 (12.5) 2 (25.0) 3 (37.5) 4 (50.0)
Auger conveyers 2 (12.5) 6 (37.5) 7 (43.7) 5 (31.2) 12 (75.0) 11 (68.7)
Belt conveyers 4 (33.3) 6 (50.0) 5 (41.7) 4 (33.3) 7 (58.3) 6 (50.0)
Weighing 1 (25.0) 1 (25.0) 1 (25.0) 1 (25.0) 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0)
Hopper 0 (0.0) 3 (75.0) 2 (50.0) 1 (25.0) 3 (75.0) 3 (75.0)
Storage silos 1 (25.0) 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0) 1 (25.0) 3 (75.0) 3 (75.0)
Feedd
Buckets elevators 0 (100.0) 1 (12.5) 2 (25.0) 3 (37.5) 5 (62.5) 4 (50.0)
Auger conveyers 2 (16.7) 4 (33.3) 5 (41.7) 4 (33.3) 7 (58.33) 8 (66.7)
Belt conveyers 2 (25.0) 3 (37.5) 4 (50.0) 6 (75.0) 8 (100.0) 8 (100.0)
Weighing 1 (25.0) 1 (25.0) 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0) 3 (75.0) 2 (50.0)
Grinding 1 (25.0) 1 (25.0) 3 (75.0) 1 (25.0) 3 (75.0) 3 (75.0)
Mixing 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (50.0) 3 (75.0) 2 (50.0) 3 (75.0)
Pelletizing 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (25.0) 0 (0.0)
Cooling 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (25.0) 1 (25.0) 2 (50.0)
Expedition silos 4 (16.7) 8 (33.3) 15
(62.5)
17 (70.8) 20 (83.3) 18 (75.0)
Truck 5 (25.0) 4 (20.0) 8 (40.0) 12 (60.0) 16 (80.0) 15 (75.0) aPorcentage of samples in which each fungus and bacteria was present. bNumber of corn samples: total, n = 88; weighing, n = 4; hopper, n = 4; pre-cleaning, n = 4; drying, n = 4; storage silos, n = 16; auger conveyers, n = 20; belt conveyers, n = 24; and buckets elevators, n = 12. cNumber of soybean meal samples: total, n = 60; weighing, n = 4; hopper, n = 4; storage silos, n = 16; auger conveyers, n = 16; belt
conveyers, n = 12; and buckets elevators, n = 8. dNumber of feed samples: total, n = 108; auger conveyers, n = 12; belt conveyers, n = 8; buckets elevators, n = 8; weighing of macros, n = 4; grinding, n = 4, mixing of ingredients, n = 4; pelletizing, n = 4; cooling, n = 4; silos
expedition, n = 24; truck, n = 20.
Under these conditions was verified that
the contamination of the equipments
compromised the quality of other raw materials,
making the economic losses to the industry
even higher. Moreover, the cleaning, washing
and maintenance of the equipments influenced
in the quality of the production system, mainly
in the water content of the products, as well as
the temperature and relative humidity of the
ambient air (Coradi, 2010a). In the evaluation
observed that the fungi development in
environments with relative humidity greater
than 70%, optimal temperatures among 20 and
30ºC, and water content greater than 12%. The
high water content associated with high
temperature in the products interfered in the
operation of the equipments, and during the
time, residual products accumulated on the
surfaces them causing a big focus of
contamination. Tables 2 show the
contamination intensity on the surfaces of
equipments, the Aspergillus candidus (3.7x105)
and Penicillium duclauxii (4.6x105)
predominated among the fungi species, while
Clostridia perfringens (1.6x105), and Listeria
monocytogenes (6.1x103) were the most
observed among the bacteria species
.
86 Effects of the feed processing in the reduction of the microbiological contamination on the final product Coradi et al.
Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.15, n.1, p.81-92, 2013
Table 4. Frequency of samples bacteria contaminated in the flow production of the feed mill
Samples
Frequencya (%)
Cl.
perfringens
L.
monocytogenes
E.
coli
Salmonellas sp.
Cornb
Buckets elevators 7 (58.3) 5 (41.7) 8 (66.7) 3 (25.0)
Auger conveyers 10 (50.0) 8 (40.0) 9 (45.0) 6 (30.0)
Belt conveyers 22 (91.7) 22 (91.7) 20 (83.3) 8 (33.3)
Weighing 3 (75.0) 3 (75.0) 1 (25.0) 0 (0.0)
Hopper 4 (100.0) 1 (25.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.0)
Pre-cleaning 2 (75.0) 2 (50.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Drying 1 (25.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (25.0) 0 (0.0)
Storage silos 8 (50.0) 9 (56.2) 8 (50.0) 3 (18.7)
Soybean mealc
Buckets elevators 4 (50.0) 4 (50.0) 5 (62.5) 2 (25.0)
Auger conveyers 10 (62.5) 8 (50.0) 9 (56.2) 5 (31.2)
Belt conveyers 8 (66.7) 7 (58.3) 6 (50.0) 2 (16.7)
Weighing 1 (25.0) 1 (25.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Hopper 4 (100.0) 2 (50.0) 1 (25.0) 1 (25.0)
Storage silos 4 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 3 (75.0) 2 (50.0)
Feedd
Buckets elevators 6 (75.0) 6 (75.0) 5 (62.5) 3 (37.5)
Auger conveyers 9 (75.0) 8 (66.7) 10 (83.3) 6 (50.0)
Belt conveyers 7 (87.5) 6 (75.0) 6 (75.0) 4 (50.0)
Weighing 2 (75.0) 1 (25.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Grinding 2 (50.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Mixing 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0) 3 (75.0) 2 (50.0)
Pelletizing 0 (0.0) 1 (25.0) 1 (25.0) 0 (0.0)
Cooling 1 (25.0) 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0) 1 (25.0)
Expedition silos 12 (50.0) 13 (54.2) 14 (58.3) 12 (50.0)
Truck 10 (50.0) 9 (45.0) 11 (55.0) 9 (45.0) aPorcentage of samples in which each fungus and bacteria was present. bNumber of corn samples: total, n = 88; weighing, n =
4; hopper, n = 4; pre-cleaning, n = 4; drying, n = 4; storage silos, n = 16; auger conveyers, n = 20; belt conveyers, n = 24; and
buckets elevators, n = 12. cNumber of soybean meal samples: total, n = 60; weighing, n = 4; hopper, n = 4; storage silos, n =
16; auger conveyers, n = 16; belt conveyers, n = 12; and buckets elevators, n = 8. dNumber of feed samples: total, n = 108;
auger conveyers, n = 12; belt conveyers, n = 8; buckets elevators, n = 8; weighing of macros, n = 4; grinding, n = 4, mixing
of ingredients, n = 4; pelletizing, n = 4; cooling, n = 4; silos expedition, n = 24; truck, n = 20.
The presence of the fungi on the
equipments of a feed mill possibilities risks to
mycotoxins production which facilitated also
the action of other deterioration agents, such as
bacteria (Coradi et al., 2011b, 2011c). The
fungi of the Aspergillus sp. produce aflatoxin
levels that high concentration cause
performance losses in the animals. The
Penicillium sp. in the feeding of animals cause
diarrhea, nephritis and gizzard erosion. The
Fusarium sp. produces trichothecenes in high
numbers, and they are potent inhibitors of
eukaryotic protein synthesis. Zearalenone is
also produced by Fusarium sp. and has strong
hyper-estrogenic effects, which result in
impaired fertility, stillbirths in females and a
reduced sperm quality in male animals. The
Fusarium sp., notably Fusarium
verticilliodides, Fusarium proliferatum and
Fusarium nygamai, as well as Alternaria sp. are
responsible to produce the fumonisins levels in
the products. As well the fungi, the bacteria
also can bring serious problems for the poultry
industry (Tables 2, 3, and 4) when presented in
the feeding. Reducing the bacterial
contamination in feed would also decrease
gastric dilatation, necrotic enteritis, and
gangrenous dermatitis by the Clostridia
botulinu; septicemia, abortions, encephalitis,
and eye infections by the Listeria sp.;
septicemia, cellulitis, swollen head, syndrome,
and airsaculitis by the Escherichia coli;
enteritis, diarrhea, and septicemia by the
Salmonella sp. On these conditions, the
identification of critical points in the production
process of according with the growth potential
of each pathogen can be an alternative to
prevent the contamination in the feed final
Effects of the feed processing in the reduction of the microbiological contamination on the final product Coradi et al. 87
Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.15, n.1, p.81-92, 2013
(Coradi et al., 2009). Table 5, shows the
variations of the water content (among at
10.76% w.b. to 15.50% w.b.) for animal meal
and corn, respectively. The high water content
in the raw materials compromises the quality of
the final diets. The amount of total water
content is the main limiting factor for the
growth of fungi. The water activity higher than
0.65 is required for active fungal metabolism.
Thus, the total water content levels higher than
150 g.kg-1 in cereals are usually required to
keep the fungi alive although large
discrepancies exist between fungi. In addition,
the Aspergillus sp., which is the less demanding
fungus, can grow at low water levels (13%-
18%), while Fusarium sp. needs 170-190 g.kg-1
substrates.
Table 5. Moisture content (% w.b.) of the
products
Sampling Moisture content (% w.b.)
Corn 15.50 + 2.40
Soybean meals 12.14 + 1.80
Animal meals 10.76 + 1.47
Grinding step 11.15 + 1.36
Mixing step 14.30 + 2.21
Mash feed 10.20 + 1.18
Pellet feed 11.20 + 1.31
The animal meals are one of the main
products involved in foodborne infections by
pathogens fungal and bacterial, as well as
physical and mycotoxin contamination. Table 6
was observed the proportion (%) of samples
infected by fungi and bacteria in the flow of
feed production. The high fungal contamination
observed in grain receiving (corn) of the feed
mill was influenced directly by field production
conditions. The growth of mycoflora on crops
is highly dependent on climatic conditions,
rainfall and temperature. A. flavus and
Aspergillus parasiticus grow best and produce
aflatoxin at temperatures greater than 21ºC.
Fungal invasion is enhanced when the crops are
stressed, such as during drought or insect
infestation. Field fungi are characterized by
requirements for a high water content (greater
than 200 g.kg-1
), and thus are vulnerable to
drying post-harvest. Moreover, during grain
storage, when the water activity of the grain
decreases to a range from 0.68 to 0.80, the
Aspergillus sp. and Penicillium sp.
predominate, with minor contributions from
Fusarium sp. However, researchers and
regulatory agencies have paid attention to
Salmonella contamination of livestock and
poultry feed by feed mill. Despite this attention,
a 1981 report by Williams concluded that there
seems to have been little change in the
Salmonella status of ingredients and poultry
feeds over the last 40 years (Williams, 1981). In
1990, the US Food and Drug Administration’s
Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM)
announced a goal of Salmonella free animal
feed ingredients and final feed. Despite this
goal Salmonella contamination was a
widespread problem in the feed industry and the
control and elimination of Salmonella during
milling procedures has proved difficult (Table
6).
Table 6. Frequency of infected samples by fungi and bacteria in the flow production of the feed
Sampling
Frequencya (%)
Fusarium
sp.
Aspergillus
sp.
Penicillium
sp.
E.
coli
Salmonella
sp.
Cornb 78.57 68.57 87.14 - -
Soybean mealsc 62.50 75.00 81.25 - -
Animal mealsd - - - 64.58 45.83
Grinding stepe 33.33 41.66 50.00 25.00 0.00
Mixing stepe 8.33 50.00 33.33 58.33 41.67
Mash feede 33.33 41.67 50.00 66.67 50.00
Pellet feede 0.00 25.00 33.33 33.33 16.67
aPercentage of samples infected by fungi and bacteria.
bTotal number of samples, n = 70.
cTotal number of samples, n = 70.
dTotal number of samples (viscera, bone, meat, and feathers meals), n = 206.
eTotal number of samples, n = 40.
88 Effects of the feed processing in the reduction of the microbiological contamination on the final product Coradi et al.
Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.15, n.1, p.81-92, 2013
Reception
Automatic dosage
weighting
Grinding¹
Mixing¹ Pelleting
System of
transport
Microingredients System of
transport
System of
transport
System of
transport
System of
transport
Cooling Expedition of
mash feed¹
Yes
No
Expedition of
pellet feed¹
System of
transport
Pre-cleaning
Hopper
Animal meals¹
Drying
System of
transport
Receiving of
corn¹
System of
transport
System of
transport
Storage
Hopper Receiving
soybean
meal¹
System of
transport
Storage
F = 5.3x105
A = 3.8x103
P = 2.5x104
F = 2.1x103
A = 4.9x105
P = 5.3x104
F = 1.4x103
A = 4.2x104
P = 3.1x103
F = 1.3x101
A = 2.4x102
P = 2.7x102
E = 3.7x103
S = 2.2x102
E = 2.6x104
S = 5.3x103
F = 0.8x101
A = 1.4x102
P = 2.7x102
E = 2.1x102
S = 2.3x101
F = 0.2x101
A = 0.9x102
P = 1.5x102
E = 1.0x101
S = 0.3x101
A = 4.9x105
Figure 1. Diagram of the flow of feed production. ¹Samples collected for microbiological analysis of F
(Fusarium sp.), A (Aspergillus sp.), P (Penicillium sp.), E (Escherichia coli), and S (Salmonellas
sp.).
According to the results (Figure 1), the
presence of Salmonella in the feed was
consequence of the addition of animal protein in
the feed formulation. Similar results were found
by Wagner (2004) while identified 24.7% of feed
samples and 48.4% samples of protein meals
contaminated with Salmonella. The same
contaminating fungi responsible for field and
stored grains were found in the feeds and feed
ingredients, as observed in the Figure 1. The high
incidence of Fusarium in corn is from field. The
presence of damaged kernels, moldy, cracked or
Effects of the feed processing in the reduction of the microbiological contamination on the final product Coradi et al. 89
Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.15, n.1, p.81-92, 2013
broken, it is probably a function of the large
intensities of rainfall in regions associated with
high temperatures and delayed harvest. The
inadequate regulation of the harvesters is one of
the factors that have helped to increase the defects
in the grains, and therefore contamination during
storage. The presence of Aspergillus sp. and
Penecillium sp. is associated with high water
contents during the period that the products were
stored. The stress field in the product caused by
insects is another possibility that have boosted the
development of fungi during storage. In meal,
especially soybean, were also observed high
levels of contamination, including comparing with
corn. The addition in the feed composition of
ingredients such as meals, minerals, vitamins, and
others decreased the proportion of corn in the total
mixing process, and consequently were reduced
also the fungal and bacterial contamination.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Corn Soybean meal Grinding Mixing Mash feed Pellet feed
y 1
03
(CF
U.g
-1)
Fusarium sp.
Aspergillus sp.
Penicillium sp.
Expon. (Fusarium sp.)
Expon. (Aspergillus sp.)
Expon. (Penicillium sp.)
Ce
Ae
Be
AdBf
Cf
Bc Bd
Cc
AaBb
Bc
Cd
Ab
Cb
BaAa
Ca
Figure 2. Comparison and distribution of fungal contamination levels in different stages of the production
flow of the feed. Capital letters with similar meanings in columns and lower case letters with the
same meanings in the lines. y = number of fungal colonies multiplied by 10³.
Significant results were observed between
mash and pelleted feed. There were reductions in
the rates of infection by fungi and bacteria in the
step of pelletizing the pellet with temperatures
above 80 °C. It is worth noting that the
elimination of most bacterial and fungal
contamination in food processing do not eliminate
the possibility that these products are
contaminated the earlier stages of production. The
production of mycotoxins have occurred even in
the raw materials in the field, even during storage
and handling of products at the mill (Coradi et al.,
2011a). As seen in Figures 2 and 3, the presence
of colonies of fungi and bacteria in the feed end,
regardless of type of processing used compromise
the quality and safety of the product when
consumed by animals, since after the rations they
are still being processed remained fifty to one
hundred twenty days stored in silos on farms.
During this period, if the product moisture
content, temperature and relative humidity
favorable the microbial load may enhance the
production of mycotoxins that will directly affect
the animals. In this case the pellet feed and is an
important factor to be considered for ensuring the
safety and quality of products from the feed mill.
As observed in Figure 3 65% and 46% of wheat
flour samples of animal origin were infected by
Eschirichia coli and Salmonella species,
respectively.
Similar results were observed by the Crump
et al. (2002), while affirmed that the Salmonella
sp. contamination in feeds was associated with the
contamination of food producing animals.
90 Effects of the feed processing in the reduction of the microbiological contamination on the final product Coradi et al.
Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.15, n.1, p.81-92, 2013
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Animal meals Mixing Mash feed Pellet feed
y 1
02
(CF
U.g
-1)
E. coli
Salmonellas sp.
Expon. (E. coli)
Expon. (Salmonellas sp.)
Bd
Ad
Bc
AbBb Bc
Ba
Aa
Figure 3. Comparison and distribution of rates of bacterial contamination at different stages of the
production flow of the feed. Capital letters with similar meanings in columns and lower case
letters with the same meanings in the lines. y = number of bacteria colonies multiplied by
102.
The cooling of the pellets has been
primarily responsible for the recontamination of
the final product while it not adequate
controlled. In the pelletizing operation, the
humidity and temperature of the pellets
increasing, however, for the preservation of the
feed must be dried at 12% (w.b.) and keep it
with low temperature to eliminate the
possibility the microorganism’s growth. The
temperature and pressure in pelletizing system
is important to guarantee the integrity and
durability of pellets, increasing percentage of
the amount of material intact (90%). However,
the drying and cooling must be efficient to
removal the water above of 12% (w.b.).
Scientifically, the granules (pellets) of larger
sizes are more irregular (whole pellets) and
have a higher percentage of empty space
between products of the finest, so the air is
movement easily through the particles, causing
a drying and cooling more uniform and efficient
when compared with smaller particles.
Analyzing the final pellet feed, the
contamination levels were present in much
smaller particles (approximately 10% of total),
which are water content levels is above of the
standards (16% w.b.) than whole pellets (12%
w.b.).
CONCLUSION
In the real operation conditions, the feed
industry had problems with microbiological
contamination in the various sectors of
production, interfering directly in the final
product quality. In general, the type of
contamination alternate by step to step of the
feed processing, and most of the time it was
punctuated by type of raw material and
processing. In addition, the feed processing
influenced positively in the reduction of
microbiological contamination in the final feed.
Moreover, the microbiological contamination in
the flow of production were characterized by
the set materials, equipment, machinery, rather
than the low quality of ingredients used in
formulating feed. The feed pelletizing reduces
microbiological contamination in final
products, positively. Conclusion that the
identification of critical points in the production
process combined usage of the adequate
cleaning and sanitation processes reduced the
risks of contamination of the feeds.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank the
CAPES Foundation (Brazilian Ministry of
Education), Department of the Agricultural
Effects of the feed processing in the reduction of the microbiological contamination on the final product Coradi et al. 91
Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.15, n.1, p.81-92, 2013
Engineering and Federal University at Viçosa
for its financial support.
BIBLIOGRAFY REFERENCES
Annett, C.B.; Viste, J.R.; Chirino-Trejo, M.;
Classen, H.L.; Middleton, D.M.; Simko, E.
Necrotic enteritis: effect of barley, wheat
and corn diets on proliferation of Clostridia
perfringens type. A. Avian Pathol. v. 31, p.
599-602, 2002.
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura e Reforma
Agrária. Regras para Análise de Sementes.
Brasília, DF, 1992.
Brasil. Portaria nº. 1428, de 26 de novembro de
1993. Estabelece a necessidade da melhoria
da qualidade de vida decorrente da
utilização de bens, serviços e ambientes
oferecidos à população na área de alimentos.
Diário Oficial, Brasília, nº. 229, p.18415,
1993.
Coradi, P.C.; Lacerda Filho, A.F.; Melo, E.C.
Análise de Perigos e Pontos Críticos de
Controle (APPCC) no processo de
fabricação da ração. Revista Eletrônica
Nutritime, v. 6, p. 1098-1102, 2009.
Coradi, P.C. Avaliação de uma fábrica de
ração para aves: instalações, processos e
produto final. Viçosa: UFV/DEA, 2010a,
191p. (Tese de Doutorado).
Coradi, P.C.; Melo, E.C.; Lacerda Filho, A.F.;
Chaves, J.B.P. Avaliação do Uso de
Ferramentas da Gestão da Qualidade em
Indústria de Ração para Aves. In: A
Engenharia Agrícola e o Desenvolvimento
das Propriedades Familiares. Ed.
Jaboticabal, SP: Jaboticabal: Sociedade
Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola, 2010b, p.
1-20.
Coradi, P.C.; Lacerda Filho, A.F.; Melo, E.C.
Quality of raw materials from different
regions of Minas Gerais State utilized in
ration industry. Revista Brasileira de
Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, v. 15,
p. 424-431, 2011a.
Coradi, P.C.; Lacerda Filho, A.F. de; Melo,
E.C. Avaliação da presença de salmonela
nas farinhas de origem animal provenientes
do estado de Minas Gerais. In: XL
Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia
Agrícola (CONBEA), 2011b, Cuiabá, MT,
Anais...... Jaboticabal, SP: Sociedade
Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA),
2011b. v. 1. p. 1-4.
Coradi, P.C.; Lacerda Filho, A.F.; Melo, E.C.;
Chaves, J.B.P. Contagem de Colônias de
Fungos em Subprodutos de Origem Animal
Processados no Estado de Minas Gerais. In:
XL Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia
Agrícola (CONBEA), 2011c, Cuiabá, MT,
Anais....Jaboticabal, SP: Sociedade
Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA),
2011c. v. 1. p. 1-4.
Crump, J.A.; Griffin, P.M.; Angulo, F.J.
Bacterial contamination of animal feed and
its relationship to human foodborne illness.
Clin. Infect. Dis. v. 35, p. 859-865, 2002.
Curtain, L. Economic study of Salmonella
poisoning and control measures in
Canada. Working Paper nº. 11. Agriculture
Canada, Canada Marketing & Economics
Branch Ottawa, 1984.
Diener, U.H. & Davis, N.D. Aflatoxin
production by isolates of Aspergillus flavus.
Phytopathology, v. 56, p. 1390-1393, 1966. Eriksen, G.S.; Pettersson, H. Toxicological
evaluation of trichothecenes in animal feed.
Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. v. 114, p. 205-
239, 2004.
Geornaras, I.; Hastings, J.W.; Van Holy, A.
Genotypic analysis of Escherichia coli
strains from poultry carcasses and their
susceptibilities to antimicrobial agents.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. v. 67, p. 1940-
1944, 2001.
Henson, S.J.; Holt, G.; Northern, J. Cost and
benefits of implementing HACCP in the UK
dairy processing sector. Food Control, v.
10, p. 99-106, 1999.
Hinton, A.; Cason, J.A.; Ingram, K.D. Tracking
spoilage bacteria in commercial poultry
processing and refrigerated storage of
poultry carcasses. International Journal of
Food Microbiology. v. 91, p. 155-165,
2004.
Lacaz, C.S.; Porto, E.; Martins, J.E.C.
Micologia médica: fungos, actinomicetos e
algas de interesse médico. 8ª ed. Sarvier,
São Paulo, 1991.
Maldonado, E.S.; Henson, S.J.; Caswell, J.A.;
Leos, L.A.; Martinez, P.A.; Aranda, G.;
Cadena, J.A. Cost-benefit analysis of
HACCP implementation in the Mexican
meat industry. Food Control, v. 16; p. 375–
381. 2005.
Roberts, T.; Ahl, A.; McDowell, R. Risk
assessment for foodborne microbiological
hazards. Washington: USDA Miscellaneous
Publication, 1995.
Rotter, B.A.; Prelusky, D.B.; Pestka, J.J.
Toxicology of deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin).
J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, v. 48, p. 1-34.
1996.
92 Effects of the feed processing in the reduction of the microbiological contamination on the final product Coradi et al.
Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.15, n.1, p.81-92, 2013
Sindirações. Sindicato Nacional da Indústria de
Alimentação Animal. Perfil da Indústria
Brasileira de Rações. São Paulo, 2008.
Speck, M.L. Compedium of methods for the
microbiological examination of Foods,
Washington: APHA/Technical Committee
on Microbiological for Foods. 914p.
Tabib, Z.; Jones, F.T.; Hamilton, P.B.
Microbiological quality of poultry feed and
ingredients. Poultry Sci. v. 60, p. 1392-
1397, 1981.
Taniwaki, M.H. Meios de cultura para
contagem de fungos em alimentos.
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e
Tecnologia de Alimentos, v. 30, p. 132-
141, 1996.
Unnevehr, L.J. Food safety issues and fresh
food product exports from less developed
countries. Agric. Econ. v. 3, p. 231-240,
2000.
Veldman, A.; Vahl, H.A.; Borggreve, G.J.;
Fuller, D.C. A survey of the incidence of
Salmonella species and Enterobacteriaceae
in poultry feeds and feed components. Vet.
Rec. v. 136, p. 169-172, 1995.
Wagner, D. Microbiological data summary
from FDA feed commodity surveys. CDC,
Animal Feed Workshop Presentation, 2004.
Weidenborner, M. Encyclopedia of Food
Mycotoxins. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.
Williams, J.E. Salmonellas in poultry feeds - a
worldwide review. Part I: Introduction.
World’s Poultry Sci. J. v. 37, p. 6-19,
1981.