An Academic presentation byDr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, Phdassistance Group www.phdassistance.comEmail: info@phdassistance.com

Effects of Editorial Peer Review in Enhancing the Quality of Reports of Biomedical Studies

TODAY'S DISCUSSION

Introduction

The use of peer review

Objectives

Blinded peer review

Conclusion

About Phdassistance

INTRODUCTION

E ditorial Peer Review Helps in improving the quality of biological study findings.

Editorial peer review is a mechanism that is used all over the world to evaluate and enhance the quality of submissions to biomedical journals, both print and electronic.

Authors benefit from the assistance offered by reviewers and from the status conferred on them by publication in journals with high peer review standards.

This article conducted a review of existing evidence on the effectiveness of editorial peer review.

Contd...

Here are stated a few studies of reasonable quality, and most of these are concerned with the effects of blinding reviewers.

Scientific findings must withstand critical review if they are to be accepted as valid, and Editorial peer review (critique, effort to disprove) is an essential element of a scientific process.

From journal selection to its submission, Phdssistance supports authors at each step and gets their work ready to be submitted for publication in high standard journals.

Our E diting Support service is designed specially for early-stage researchers to make the rigorous publication process simple and easy.

Learned societies and journal editors usually rely on the views of independent (outside) content experts in making decisions on publication of submitted m anuscripts or presentation of reports at meetings.

This system of appraisal is known as peer review.

The use of peer review is generally expected to raise the quality of the end-product (i.e. the journal or scientific meeting) and to provide a mechanism for rational, fair and objective decision-making (Rennie 2003).

THE USE OF PEER REVIEW

Surveys indicate that clinicians give greater credence to findings published in peer-reviewed journals , yet little attention is paid to the definition of peer review or effects of variations in review practices between journals (Godlee 2003).

If you want to improve the content of the dissertation through peer-reviewed and proofread by professionals, then you can contact Phdassistance Expert Peer review and Pre Submission Help service.

To estimate the effect of processes, or combinations of processes, in editorial peer review on the outcomes studied in the r esearch on this topic. These processes are grouped as:

different ways of screening submissions (i.e. carrying out a preliminary assessment of the submission)

different ways of assigning submissions (i.e. choosing and assigning assessors to the submission)

different ways of masking submissions (i.e. concealing the identity and background of the authors and/or the assessors)

OBJECTIVES

different ways of eliciting internal opinions (i.e. opinions on the scientific quality of the submission from those within the publishing organisation)

different ways of eliciting external opinions (i.e. opinions on the scientific quality of the submissions from those outside the publishing organisation)

different(grouporsingleperson)decision-makingprocedures(i.e.deciding whether to publish the submission)

different types of feedback to author(s) and subsequent revision of submissions

acombinationoftheaboveoranyotherprocessthatcanbeconsideredas editorial peer review

Contd...

The chances of your paper getting published solely depend on the selection of peer reviewer for your paper.

Phdassistance peer reviewers provide high standard peer review which will help youin publishing in high standard journals.

Studies assessing the effect of blinding/masking on the quality of external opinions

ofpeerreviewisThetraditionalmethodsingle-blind peer review.

unawareoftheidentitiesof

theReviewers are aware of authors, but authors are identities of reviewers.

(Indouble-blindreviewneitherthereviewers nor the writers know who is on the other side.)

Contd...

BLINDED PEER REVIEW

Your manuscript will be peerreviewedbyPhdassistance subject-matter experts whohave experience in working with the top academic international journals.

They would help you in getting detailed review of your manuscript in areas thatneed improvement to match the journal standards for publication.

Studies assessing the effects of submission checklists on the outcome

Studies assessing the effects of peer review on study report quality

CONCLUSION

Peer review is an important component in improving the quality of scientific publications [1].

Most scientific journals incorporate it to help editors make judgments and improve the quality of published articles [4].

ABOUT PHDASSISTANCE

Phdassistance experts evaluate every aspect of your work, including study design, research methods r eporting, significance to the field of study, ethical conformity, and data analysis.

They will also perform a thorough review of journal eligibility to reduce the possibilities of rejection.

Finally, you will obtain a report that includes information such as presentation clarity, organisation and structure, evidence, conclusion, and literature r eview quality.

CONTACT US

UNITED KINGDOM+44-1143520021

INDIA+91-4448137070

EMAILinfo@phdassistance.com