The Theory of Continental Drift Continental Drift Discovery.
Effect of v drift tuning on reconstruction
description
Transcript of Effect of v drift tuning on reconstruction
Effect of vdrift tuning on reconstruction
Filippo Pisano, Marco Terranova, N. Amapane, G. Cerminara
Filippo Pisano Sep 28, 2010 2
Introduction
• Goal: Test the effect of vd correction on reconstruction
– At the moment, vd = 54.3 m/ns for all chambers/SL
– Study vd on collision data in the different chambers
– How much we gain in correcting for the average vd in each chamber?
• We get vd from the 4-parameter segment fit by Anna M.
– Fits “t0seg” and vd/vd together with segment parameters
– Possible only for phi segments (>5 hits needed)– Standard CMSSW code
• Card: performT0_vdriftSegCorrection = cms.bool(True)
• Re-reco using corrected <vd> for each chamber
– No attempt to look at e.g. the Z-dependence of vd in the chamber: such a dependence is not supported the present vdrift DB
Filippo Pisano Sep 28, 2010 3
Sample and Event Selection
• Sample used: /MuOnia/Run2010A-CS_Onia-v6/RAW-RECO– Central skim of global/tracker di-muons with M > 2 GeV – Includes RAW (necessary for re-reco)– Additional filters: good vertex, noscraping
Note: New skim of golden Z + W candiates with RAW recently requested. Will be the ideal sample for this kind of studies.
• Consider only events with one GlobalMuon or TrackerMuon with pT>5 GeV
• Use only 4D segments with:– ||<25 deg– at least 7 phi hits and 4theta hits
Filippo Pisano Sep 28, 2010 4
4-Parameter fit (Anna M.)
• When we activate the computation of vd:
– t0seg peak is shifted (as expected)
• Vd and ttrig must be corrected together to keep residuals centered at 0
• vd/vd distribution is large
– Still, we try to use average value for correction
CMSSW Default:t0seg fit with fixed vd = 54.3 m/ns
t0seg (ns) E
xam
ple
: W
0, M
B1,
all
sect
ors
t0seg = – 0.2 ns
With vd fit activated: both t0seg and vd/vd computed:
vd/vd
W0,
MB
1, a
ll se
cto
rs
<vd/vd> = –1.7%
t0seg (ns)
t0seg = 1.5 ns
Filippo Pisano Sep 28, 2010 5
• Generally ~1.8% higher than the current DB value– Lower vd in MB1 W+– 2, as already observed in CRAFT – Nicely Z-symmetric. – Same code gives lower value on MC - but same behavior– Spread among sectors is small
• Use the value obtained merging sectors in the following
Current DB value: 54.3 m/ns
v d (
m/n
s)
MB1 MB2 MB3 MB4
+ Data– Data (merged sectors)– MC 3.8.2 (Z→)
MC DB only:52.3 m/ns in W+-2 MB1
Result: Measured vd
Filippo Pisano Sep 28, 2010 6
Re-Reconstruction: Closure Test
• Re-reconstruct segment with correction for both < vd/vd> and < t0
seg>, for each chamber
• Algorithm converges: negligible residual corrections – Example: W0 MB1
Exa
mp
le:
W0,
MB
1, a
ll se
cto
rs
t0seg = – 0.48 ns
<vd/vd> = –0.05%
Filippo Pisano Sep 28, 2010 7
Improvement in Residuals (e.g.: W0 MB1)
• Some improvement in residual widths (just one example here)• Flatter dependence vs distance from wire
– Although the correction is modest if compared with non-linearity in the wire region…
= 285 mCMSSW 3.8.2 default
Corrected vd = 276 m
Filippo Pisano Sep 28, 2010 8
• Very small change (as expected) – No side effect observed – track reconstruction is not broken!– Tested on MC as well
Effect on Track Fit
2/DOF 2/DOF
#DT hits in STA fit#DT hits in global fit
Global muons with ||<1.2, pT>10 GeV
Global Standalone
Global Standalone
– Current vd
– Corrected vd
Filippo Pisano Sep 28, 2010 9
Conclusions• The 4-parameter fit seems to compute reliable vd values
– Correction improves reconstruction quantities, although modestly– Resulting drift velocities are larger than the present DB value
• Outlook:– Compare with vd from meantimer method
• cf Silvia’s presentation in the Calibration session• MTs will have to be used for theta SLs
– Look at of Z- and segment angle dependence• No mechanism is available to specify such dependencies in the
vdrift DB– The ultimate resolution may be limited by non-linearities more than by
the accuracy of the average vd determination• Tune the cell parametrization in the simulation with a scale factor
to correct for the difference between vd in data and MC• Same for the parametrization available in reconstruction