Effect of Size Reduction in Complex Gold Ore ion Recovery by Aghil Ojaghi

download Effect of Size Reduction in Complex Gold Ore ion Recovery by Aghil Ojaghi

of 4

Transcript of Effect of Size Reduction in Complex Gold Ore ion Recovery by Aghil Ojaghi

  • 8/3/2019 Effect of Size Reduction in Complex Gold Ore ion Recovery by Aghil Ojaghi

    1/4

    56 Mineral Processing Technology (MPT 2007)Effect of Size Reduction in Complex Gold Ore

    Cyanidation Recovery

    Aghil Ojaghi, Ahmad Amini and M. Fattahi

    M.Sc. in Mineral Processing, M.Sc. in Mineral Processing,managing director of Zarkavan Alborz Co. Geological Survey of Iran

    B.Sc in geology, managing director ofZamin Rod Sepahan Co.

    ABSTRACT: Generally gold recovery increases from size reduction although for polymetalic and complex ore,it seems not. Therefore polymetalic ore that contained 5.5% Pb, 0.3% Cu, 9% Fe, 1.4% Zn and 22 ppm Au were

    investigated. Tests with several size fractions have done. Results showed that recovery increase up to a point after

    that recovery goes down. It seems that in complex and polymetalic ores size reduction causes useless elementswill be free therefore, cyanide consumption increase and gold recovery decrease.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Cyanidation is one of the popular and common

    methods for gold processing. Several parameters

    are effective in cyanidation although size reduction

    and cyanide consumption importance of them.

    Regards to ore dressing experts the more size

    reduction the more increase recovery. But for

    pollymetalic ores it seems different. Therefore inthis paper we concerned about this and effects of

    size reduction in gold recovery were investigated.

    Sample were taken from the Gandi gold deposit

    is located 125 km SW of the Damghan city, NE

    of Iran.

    2. MICROSCOPIC MINERALOGY

    Mineralization occurs as hydrothermal veinlets

    containing gold, copper, lead and zinc minerals.

    The upper ca. 25-35 m of the deposit has been

    oxidized. The ore contained Au (22 ppm), Ag

    (16.6 ppm), As (72 ppm), Pb (5.5%), Zn (1.4% )and Cu (0.3%). Ore samples were studied by

    XRD, XRF and wet chemical analysis. Micro-

    scopic studies showed that the ore is composed

    of mineral assemblages goethite, galena, anglesite,

    pyrite, chalcopyrite, cerussite, tetraedrite, covellite

    and native gold (Up to 100 125 micron). The

    image analyzer was investigated and processing

    with QemScan software revealed that the goldwas associated with anglesite (PbSO4). Results of

    microscopic study was shown in Figure 2-6.

    Fig. 2

    Fig. 3

    Fig. 4

    Galena

    Pyrite

    Au

    Galena

  • 8/3/2019 Effect of Size Reduction in Complex Gold Ore ion Recovery by Aghil Ojaghi

    2/4

    57 Mineral Processing Technology (MPT 2007)

    Fig. 5

    Fig. 6: Gold-bearing particles (red pixels)

    3. MATERIAL AND METHODS

    For investigation 500 Kg of the ore was taken

    and crushed with jaw, cone crusher and roller

    crusher less than 2 mm. The sample after homo-genate was separated to 1 kg head samples fortests. 3 kg of the sample was sieved by A.S.T.M.

    screens (size details were shown in table 1 and

    Figure 7) that determined gold distribution in

    size fractions of main sample.

    Table 1: Gold distribution in size fraction

    Size

    (micron)

    Weight

    (gr)

    Gold

    grade

    (ppm)

    Gold

    distribution

    (%)

    +1000 654.9 15.53 17.29

    +500 742.9 16.26 20.23

    +250 436 17.36 12.87

    +150 427.9 16.67 12.13

    +75 383 18.5 12.04

    +45 33.7 60 3.44

    +20 96 96.94 15.82

    -20 176 19.65 5.88

    Total 2950.4 19.94 100

    5.88

    15.82

    3.44

    12.04 12.1312.87

    20.5317.29

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    golddistribution(%)

    20 20 45 75 150 250 500 1000

    size fraction (micron)

    Figure 7: Gold distribution in head sample

    For cyanidation tests, head sample was

    ground by ball mill (Denver 30 mm) indifferent times. In each case 1 kg with 1 liter

    water was ground. Curves of grain size-grinding

    time were draw and showed in each time how

    much is less than 200 and 325 meshes (Table 2

    and Figure 8).

    Table 2: grinding time and grain size

    Grain size less

    than 325 mesh

    (%)

    Grain size

    less than

    200 mesh

    (%)

    Grinding

    time

    (minute)

    -----6610

    63.5------147180.8420

    8090.630

    -----94.2540

    919750

    90.6

    94.2597

    63.5

    71

    80

    91

    66

    80.84

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Grinding Time (min)

    Grainsize(%)

    -200 mesh

    -325 mesh

    Fig. 8: curves of grain size and grinding time ratio

    Au

    1 pixel = 2m

  • 8/3/2019 Effect of Size Reduction in Complex Gold Ore ion Recovery by Aghil Ojaghi

    3/4

  • 8/3/2019 Effect of Size Reduction in Complex Gold Ore ion Recovery by Aghil Ojaghi

    4/4

    59 Mineral Processing Technology (MPT 2007)oxygen isotope constraints, MineraliumDeposita, 2004, No. 39, pp. 265-281.

    [5] T.A. Helms & Dr. A.R. Butcher, Analysis of

    Gandi Au ore deposit by QEMSCAN, 2004.[6] Ubaldini, S., Veglio, F., Toro, L., Abbruzzese, C.,

    Effect of lead nitrate on cyanidation of goldores: progress on the study of the mechanisms,

    Mineral engineering, 2000, Vol. 13, No. 14-15,pp. 1641-1646.

    [7] Curreli, L., Loi, J., Peretti, I., Rossi, G., Trois, P.,Zucca, A.,Gold recovery enhancement fromcomplex sulphide ores through combined

    bioleaching and cyanidation, MineralEngineering, 1997, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 567-576.

    [8] Perry, R., Browner, R.E., Dunne, R., Stoitis, N.,Low pH cyanidation of gold, 1999, Mineral

    engineering, Vol. 12, pp. 1431-1440.