effect of motivation on SLA

download effect of motivation on SLA

of 15

Transcript of effect of motivation on SLA

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    1/15

    Paper Task of Psycholinguistics

    Second Language Acquisition

    The Effect of Motivation on SLA

    By:

    1. Andri Irawan (1010231106)2. Asbit Iman Sampurna (1010231115)3. Nafiatul Laili (1110231154)4. Nur Muhammad Sholeh (1110231150)5. Yunita Rahayu (0910231004)

    TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY

    JEMBER MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY

    2013

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    2/15

    CHAPTER I

    INTRODUCTION

    1.1 Background of the ProblemLanguage is an extremely important way of interacting with the people

    around us. We use language to let others know how we feel, what we need, and to

    ask questions. We can modify our language to each situation. For instance, we

    talk to our small children with different words and tone than we conduct a

    business meeting. To communicate effectively, we send a message with words,

    gestures, or actions, which somebody else receives.

    Through language we can connect with other people and make sense of our

    experiences. In this globalization era, the communication with the other people is

    not limited in our country only but also from the foreign country. Thats why we

    will not only learn one language as first language. The other language that we

    need to learn named second language. The importance of learning a second

    language becomes self-evident. Learning a second language helps you to

    communicate across cultures and to conduct business in lands you may never have

    previously considered viable markets. It also helps you to address customers in

    the language that they understand best and in which they are most comfortable

    communicating. Additionally, the importance of learning a second language is

    emphasized every day when we see the diversity of earths cultures and the

    amazing array of people that make up our global community. Some describing

    here make us interested to know more about second language acquisition.

    As far as we know, there are some factors that have strong variable in success

    of learning second language. The success of any action usually depends on theextent to which individuals strive to attain their purpose, along with their desire to

    do so. In general people have come to refer to this psychological factorthe

    impulse that generates the actionas motivation (Abrudan, 1999). The insight

    about motivation for us just about desire, so that we will discuss the real definition

    of motivation. Moreover our curious about the effect of motivation in second

    language acquisition.

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    3/15

    1.2 Formulation of the ProblemA. What is Second Language Acquisition?B. What is the definition of motivation?C. Is there any effect of motivation on second language acquisition?1.3 The Objective of the Problem

    1. To know what second language acquisition is.

    2. To know the definition of motivation.

    3. To know the effect of motivation on second language acquisition.

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    4/15

    CHAPTER II

    DISCUSSION

    2.1 Second language acquisition

    Today many people are attempting to master more than one language. It is

    undeniable that acquiring two or more languages may gain some benefits. Being a

    bilingualism or multilingualism would imply social and economical advantages.

    They would be commonly regarded as a group of people that has higher social

    status since the acquisition of other language requires a tremendous effort. A part

    from that, this skill may bring on an income or extra income if the possessors

    apply it in particular occupations such as interpreters, translators, or language

    teachers. Moreover, in this article I would like to argue that second language

    acquisition also implies the acquisition of the second world view. Then I will try

    to reveal how it happens. Furthermore, some suggestions on pedagogical methods

    to assist in the process of second language acquisition are presented.

    a. Language, Culture, and CognitionOGrady et al. (1997) defined language as a system of communication, a

    medium for thought, a vehicle for literary expression, a social institution, a matter

    for political controversy, a catalyst for nation building (p.1). Human beings as

    the users of language have skill and capacity in accepting input, manipulating, and

    then producing information about phenomenon in the world. The process of

    producing words, arranging them into grammatical order that eventually form a

    unit that contains meaning involves cognitive means.

    Similarly, culture deals with the mental action or process of acquiring

    knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses.Kessing (1979) stated a culture is, in a cognitive sense, a system of knowledge, a

    composite of the cognitive systems more or less shared by members of a society.

    (p.13) Both language and culture share a general idea, i.e. a system associated

    with cognition. In terms of cognition, different cultures and languages, to some

    extent, may indicate different procedure of obtaining knowledge and

    comprehending through line of thinking, skills, experience, and the sensory

    faculty. Kessing (1979) provided an evident of a particular phenomenon that is

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    5/15

    viewed differently by people from different cultures. He stated In, culture after

    culture, ones predecessors are viewed as having gone ahead (before) along a

    line of march we are following, and ones life experiences are seen as having left

    behind (past = passed). Kwaio culture permutes this model by conceptualizing

    the time periods associated with those who has gone before (ta?a I na?o people in

    front) as being in front ofand downward from the present(p.31). This evidence

    supports the idea that different cultures may have different point of view of the

    same phenomenon.

    Another authentication of different cognition of culture and language

    variance can be observed from a linguistic feature. In this case, the mind-as-body

    metaphor (referred to Kessings term) can be another hint of how people as users

    of a language perceive phenomenon in the world. For example, to express that a

    child is intelligent or clever, English will say the child is bright. Meanwhile,

    Indonesian will say anak itu otaknya encer (the childs brain is liquid/watery).

    English views cleverness as like light, but Indonesian regards it as fluid. The two

    differences of the use of body metaphor may point out that they have different

    perception on the same phenomenon. To sum up, a language and culture may

    indicate a particular way of thinking. People from the same language and culture

    are likely to have the same cognition. They will probably have similar perception

    and feeling on phenomena in the world. On the contrary, users of different

    languages and cultures may differ in expressing the phenomena in the world. It is

    strongly influenced by their ways of thinking.

    b. Second Language Acquisition and Cultural NormsThe previous section may lead an idea that the mastery of a certain

    language may reflect the possession of knowledge on the culture that involvescognition of the people as the users of the language itself. It means that the

    process of language acquisition implies a transferring of culture. Lyons (1981)

    stipulated the process of language acquisition is such that the biological

    transmission of whatever is universal in language is also dependent, for its

    success, upon the process of cultural transmission (p.322). Biological

    transmission refers to the genetically transmitted faculties of human mind. The

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    6/15

    latter means a system of knowledge and the cognitive systems. The two elements

    play an important rule in the acquisition of first language.

    Cultural transmission has more emphasis in the language acquisition.

    Some features in linguistic such as lexical and grammar may involve cultural

    entities. A word in a language can represent the perception of the language users

    on the sign or phenomenon that is represented. Similarly, the perception of the

    language users on gender can be seen from the unit of grammar they use. For

    example, determiners in some languages distinguish an object by attributing

    different determiners of gender. Therefore, the acquisition of a language naturally

    will imply the acquisition of its culture. Lyons (1981) stated that If competence

    in a particular language implies the ability to produce and understand sentences of

    that language, then it is unquestionably a part of culture: i.e. social knowledge

    (p.323) Furthermore, it is summarized that full understanding of the several kinds

    of meaning that are encoded in the grammar and vocabulary of a language comes

    only with a full understanding of the culture, or cultures, in which it operates

    (Lyons, 1981). It means that one cannot be regarded as having competence in a

    language if he or she has no comprehension on its culture. On the contrary, one

    who has competence in more than one language should possess more knowledge

    on culture. This is a consequence of second language acquisition that requires the

    acquisition of cultural norms that exist in the target language.

    The cultural norms may reflect the cognition of the people in the target

    language, and the cultural script of the second language. The norms include some

    notions in interaction that deals with content and form. The interactional norms

    naturally bear some aspects of culture that exist in a community or nation.

    Liddicoat and Crozet (2001) studied the conversation of Australian students assecond language learners of French on a particular topic. The learners were asked

    to make a conversation initiated by Didyou have a good weekend? Lidicoat and

    Crozet found that the typical talk of French did not appear since the subjects did

    not have knowledge of interactional norms in French culture. This happened as

    the consequence of different interactional norms between two cultures. Liddicoat

    and Crozet (2001) as cites in Beal study (1992) revealed that Australians perceive

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    7/15

    that the question does not have any purpose of finding detail information from

    their partner of talk, but French see it as the question that needs detailed answer.

    Australians tend to give facts rather than opinion while French prefer to

    give detail explanation including opinions. Dealing with conversational style or

    form Australian do not interrupt the person who is talking, but French do. This

    study has argued that differences in conversational style are linked to problems

    and misunderstandings in both intercultural and intercultural interactions.

    Lindicoat and Crozets study supports the idea that second language acquisition

    should involve the acquisition of the culture as to succeed in the process of

    communication. Since culture reflects cognition or the perception of how people

    in a community view the signs or phenomena in the world, second language

    acquisition implicates the acquisition of another world view. Therefore, in this

    context a bilingualist or multilinguists should have benefit by gaining such

    awareness.

    c. The Pedagogical MethodThe introduction of culture to second language learners could be

    problematic. The learning goal would become clouded or lost by the emphasis on

    culture. To avoid such a deviation occurs; there should be an appropriate method

    or methods to teach the cultural norms. Crozet (1996) proposed a method in

    transferring cultural or interactional norm to second language learners. The

    method includes the activity that is divided into four phases: awareness-raising

    phase, experimentation phase, production phase, and feedback phase. The

    awareness-raising phase involves second language learners to identify a short list

    of stereotypes about peoples learners and people of the target language.

    Naturally the learners identify negative stereotypes of the two cultures.Then the teacher suggests that stereotyping frequently results from

    misunderstanding the different cultural norms speakers used in different countries

    to communicate with each other. Learners are asked to answer a question in the

    learners language context then find out the equivalent answer in the target

    language. This activity is aimed to show that the answer cannot be easily

    translated from one language to another without knowing the appropriate cultural

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    8/15

    norms in the target language. The typical answers along with the explanation are

    provided at the end of this phase.

    In the experimentation phase, the teacher let the learners engage in a

    multimedia task based on unscripted videotaped conversation between two native

    speakers of the target language. Then the learners are asked to reconstruct the

    correct sequence of the scrambled-order conversation, and to recognize the norms

    of interaction that had been brought to their attention during the awareness-raising

    phase. After this phase, the learners conducted role-plays of a conversation on

    fictitious similar topic using appropriate target language norms of interaction.

    During this production phase the learners role-plays are watched by the

    others or they can be videotaped. Finally, in the feedback phase the learners

    comment each other about the conversation they have done. The discussion is

    established and eventually this lead to the understanding that learning to speak in

    a foreign language is not a matter of simply adopting foreign norms of behavior,

    but about finding an acceptable accommodation between ones first culture and the

    target culture. Lidicoat and Crozet found that the learners who have undergone

    these phases for ten weeks showed the acquisition of the cultural norm or

    interactional norms for both contents and form. Although this acquisition of form

    tended to lose after one-year completion of the instruction, but the contents still

    remained.

    Similarly, another method of transferring cultural norms through second

    language learning is by giving the learners a chance to observe directly the

    behavior of the target language native speakers. This method is called

    behavioristic learning. La Forge (1983) recommended that progress in second

    language acquisition took place in a significantly different way frombehaviouristic learning (p.113) These studies recommend us that both

    pedagogical methods can be appropriate to transfer cultural norms to second

    language (L2) learners. At the same time, it means that this pedagogical method

    introduce the cognition of native speakers in the target language to the L2

    learners. As the result, the L2 learners not only gain the acquisition of the second

    language, but also the acquisition of second world view.

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    9/15

    2.2 Motivation

    There are several factors that combine in a profile of a successful L2

    learner. Obviously, the motivation to learn is important. Many learners have an

    instrumental motivation. That is, they want to learn the L2 in order to achieve

    some other goal, such as completing a school graduation requirement or being

    able to read scientific publications, but not really for any social purpose. In

    contrast, those learners with an integrative motivation want to learn the L2 for

    social purpose, in order to take part in the social life of a community using that

    language and to become an accepted member of that community.

    Motivation may be as much a result of success as a cause. A language

    learning situation that provides support and encourages students to try to use

    whatever L2 skills they have in order to communicate successfully must

    consequently be more helpful than one that dwells an errors, corrections, and a

    failure to be perfectly accurate. Indeed, the learner who is willing to guess, risks

    making mistakes, and tries to communicate in the L2 will tend, given the

    opportunity, to be are successful.

    Motivation variables and second language learning

    1. What is meant by the term motivation?

    The term motivation in a second language learning context is seen

    according to Gardner (1985) as referring to the extent to which the individual

    works or strives to learn the language because of a desire to do so and the

    satisfaction experienced in this activity (p.10).

    According to the Pocket Oxford English Dictionary (2004), motivation is

    '1. the reason or reasons behind ones actions or behavior. 2. Enthusiasm.'

    (p.587). Hence, the abstract term motivation on its own is rather difficult todefine. It is easier and more useful to think in terms of the motivated learner:

    one who is willing or even eager to invest effort in learning activities and to

    progress.

    2. What are different types of motivation?

    Gardner and Lambert (1959, 1972) have done pioneering work to explore

    the nature of motivation specific to language study. Gardner highlights two

    different types of motivation:

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    10/15

    1) Instrumental motivation: the desire to learn a language because it would

    fulfill certain utilitarian goals, such as getting a job, passing an examination,

    etc.

    2) Integrative motivation: the desire to learn a language in order to communicate

    with people from another culture that speak that language; the desire is also

    there to identify closely with the target language group.

    Instrumental motivation vs integrative motivation

    A distinction has been made in the literature between integrative and

    instrumental motivation: the desire to identify with and integrate into the target-

    language culture, contrasted with the wish to learn the language for the purpose of

    study or career promotion. Gardner and Lambert (1959, 1972) showed that

    success in a foreign/second language is likely to be lower if the underlying

    motivational orientation is instrumental rather than integrative. But research since

    then has cast doubt on the application of this claim to foreign language learners in

    general. In any case, at least one other study (Burstall et al., 1974) has indicated

    that it may be impossible in practice to distinguish between the two. (Penny Ur

    (2005) A course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory, Cambridge:

    Cambridge University Press.p.276).

    Another distinction, perhaps more useful for teachers, is that between

    intrinsic motivation (the urge to engage in the learning activity for its own sake)

    and extrinsic (motivation that is derived from external incentives).

    3. What are characteristics of motivated learners?

    The author of a classic study of successful language learning (Naiman et al.,1978) came to the conclusion that the most successful learners are not necessarily

    those to whom a language comes very easily; they are those who display certain

    typical characteristics, most of them clearly associated with motivation.:

    Positive task orientation Ego involvement Need for achievement High aspirations

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    11/15

    Goal orientation Perseverance Tolerance of ambiguity

    4. What is the role of the teacher in second language learning?

    In the second language classroom environment, what undoubtedly

    influences learners learning outcomes is their interpretation of interpersonal

    teacher behavior. So, in language learning, the teacher plays the main role.

    According to Mickey Nasiri, General Manager at Cambridge Silicon Radio:

    "For the drivers in my city, it is obvious how bad the pedestrians behave. They

    walk on the roads, slow down the traffic, and they dont even care about their own

    safety. The drivers have to honk to make the pedestrians aware of the danger they

    put their lives in. For the pedestrians in my city, it is obvious how bad the drivers

    behave. Drivers dont let the pedestrians cross the roads and they honk and

    pollute the city.

    A simple psychometric test shows that hyped self-perception is a

    widespread human trait. A good leader is aware of this myth and surrenders to the

    belief that people are like me, and they try to do the best job they can which

    helps in effective delegation. This belief makes the good leader wonder why one

    succeeds and the other fails. If understanding the concept of 'hyped self-

    perception' is a foundation for effective delegation, the answer to the above

    question, 'condition', is the heart of motivational skills. Although everyone tries

    ones best, the conditions are different. The obstacles in ones condition could de-

    motivate the individual, and de-motivated people are normally not successful. A

    good leader works for creating the condition conducive to success for peoplearound him/her. People do the best they can; the leader just needs to remove the

    biggest obstacles. Now, if the good leaders belief in people would lead to less

    honking cars, well, that is also positive for the reduction of noise pollution. "

    (Leader speech motivating leaders, Dont honk!: The Hindu Business Line

    Monday, August 14, 2006 p.11.)

    The above-said words were meant not only for a good leader, but also for

    a good teacher or facilitator - who helps to remove the biggest language learning

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    12/15

    obstacles from his/her learners, and creates conditions conducive to language

    learning success.

    2.3 The Influence of Motivation in Second Language Acquisition

    Most of people in the world must be learn second language which is

    needed mainly for this modern century. Muriel (2006:5) notes that second

    language acquisition (SLA) involves a wide range of language learning settings

    and learner characteristics and circumstances. The reasons of why many people

    learn second language are among others: interest in learning L2 because of a

    desire to learn about or associate with the people who use it (e.g. for romantic

    reasons), because of an intention to participate or integrate in the L2-using speech

    community, and also for requirement of something necessary like for graduation,

    occupation, etc. The reasons refer to the most widely recognized types of

    motivation are integrative and instrumental. The relative effect of one or the other

    is dependent on complex personal and social factors: e.g. L2 learning by a

    member of the dominant group in a society may benefit more from integrative

    motivation, and L2 learning by a subordinate group member may be more

    influenced by instrumental motivation.

    Another factor which is frequently cited to explain why some L2 learners

    are more successful than others is individual motivation (Muriel,2006:85).

    Motivation in language-learning plays a vital role. It is motivation that produces

    effective second-language communicators by planting in them the seeds of self-

    confidence. It also successfully creates learners who continuously engage

    themselves in learning even after they complete a targeted goal. In addition,

    Muriel (2006:10) states that adding second languages at an older age often takesconsiderable effort, however, and thus requires motivation. Actually the old age is

    not becoming problem in learn some languages if there is a strong motivation that

    comes internally even externally.

    Motivation may be as much a result of success as a cause (George,

    2006:168). A language-learning situation that provides support and encourages

    students to try to use whatever L2 skills they have in order to communicate

    successfully must consequently be more helpful than one that dwells on errors,

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    13/15

    corrections and a failure to be perfectly accurate. Indeed, the learner who is

    willing to guess, risks making mistakes, and tries to communicate in the L2 will

    tend, given the opportunity, to be more successful. The next explanation described

    by Nuri (2001) as cited in Reece & Walker (1997), express that motivation is a

    key factor in the second language learning process. They stress that a less able

    student who is highly motivated can achieve greater success than the more

    intelligent student who is not well motivated.

    From the text above, it is explain that motivation is giving a good

    influence for learning second language because by high motivation in learning

    second language it can make the students more interesting to the teaching learning

    especially the language that they do not acquire in their origin environment.

    Thats why motivation is vital in language learning. It makes language learners

    positive about their own learning. It also creates the drive in them to acquire the

    targeted language, enjoy the learning process, and experience real communication.

    Moreover, experience of success and satisfaction has a strong connection with

    motivation. By realizing their improvement and achievement, students always

    gain the feeling of success.

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    14/15

    CHAPTER III

    CLOSING

    3.1 Conclusion

    After discussing above, we conclude that Second Language Acquisition

    (SLA) is the process of the people learns about second language that involves

    some of language learning settings and learner characteristics and circumstances

    which influence to acquire second language. Additional language is called a

    second language (L2) even though it may actually be the third, fourth, or tenth

    language to be acquired.

    In the other one we need some motivation to learn second language.Motivation is defined as the learner's orientation with to achieve the goal of

    learning a second language so the teachers have to find creative ways to teach

    language and increase students motivation to learn language

    The success in second language acquisition depends on many factors.

    Motivation factor is among the most important ones. As to motivation, it has been

    found that motivated learners are more successful in second language acquisition

    than those who are not motivated.

    3.2 Suggestion for Laguage Teacher

    In order to make the language learning process a more motivating

    experience instructors need to put a great deal of thought into developing

    programs which maintain student interest and have obtainable short term goals.

    Teachers need to create interesting lessons in which the students attention is

    gained. This can sometimes be accomplished by the use of teaching strategies

    which are not often called upon by other teachers in mainstream subject areas.

    Encouraging students to become more active participants in a lesson can

    sometimes assist them to see a purpose for improving their communication skills

    in the target language. Successful communication using the target language

    should result in students feeling some sense of accomplishment.

  • 7/28/2019 effect of motivation on SLA

    15/15

    REFERENCES

    Lucas, Rochelle Irene. 2010. A Study on the Intrinsic Motivation Factors in

    Second Language Learning Among Selected Freshman Students.

    Philippine ESL Journal, (Online) Vol. 4.

    Norris-Holt, Jacqueline. 2001. Motivation as a Contributing Factor in Second

    Language Acquisition. The Internet TESL Journal, (Online), Vol. 7, No. 6,

    ( http://iteslj.org/Articles/Norris-Motivation.html, diakses 12 April 2013).

    Nuri, Mehmet. 2001. The Effects of Age and Motivation Factors on Second

    Language Acquisition.Frat University Journal of Social Science,

    (Online), Vol. 11, No. 2,

    (http://web.firat.edu.tr/sosyalbil/dergi/arsiv/cilt11, diakses 13 April 2013)

    Saville-Troike, Muriel. 2006.Introducing Second Language Acquisition. New

    York: Cambridge University Press.

    Tam, Frank Wai-ming. 2009. Motivation in Learning a Second Language:

    Exploring the Contributions of Family and Classroom Processes. The

    Alberta Journal of Educational Research, (Online), Vol. 55, No. 1

    Ushida, Eiko. 2005. The Role of Students Attitudes and Motivation in Second

    Language Learning in Online Language Courses. CALICO Journal,

    (Online), Vol. 23, No. 1.

    Yule, George. 2006. The Study of Language. New York: Cambridge University

    Press.