Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

15
Effect of extra jets on Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement top mass measurement Regina Demina, Elizabeth Groves University of Rochester 12/04/04

description

Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement. Regina Demina, Elizabeth Groves University of Rochester 12/04/04. Monte Carlo sample. Monte Carlo – full simulation produced by Michael Begel – ALPGEN+PYTHIA tt0j, tt1j, tt2j One W forced to decay leptonically, the other hadronically. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

Page 1: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

Effect of extra jets on top mass Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement measurement

Regina Demina, Elizabeth Groves

University of Rochester

12/04/04

Page 2: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 2

Monte Carlo sampleMonte Carlo sample• Monte Carlo – full simulation produced by Michael Begel –

ALPGEN+PYTHIA– tt0j, tt1j, tt2j

• One W forced to decay leptonically, the other hadronically

Page 3: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 3

The questionThe question

• Consider only four leading jets, no matter how many jets are there in the even.

• How often one of these jets is NOT a top decay product, e.g. a gluon radiation jet?

• Procedure to match top decay products– Identify partons from top decay:

• b and bbar quarks with top being the parent

• q or qbar from W decay, with W from top decay

– Match jets to partons by R<0.5

Page 4: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 4

Fraction of misidentified jetsFraction of misidentified jets

Jet quality cuts

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

3 4 5 6 7Njets

Fra

ctio

tt0j

tt1j

tt2j

combined

matched

Page 5: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 5

Mt in tt + jetsMt in tt + jets

ttbar + 0jttbar + 1 jttbar +2 j

Kevin Black – effect of extra jet on mass measurement in template method.

4 jets, 1 not matched4 jets, all matched

Ensemble tests~2.5 GeV topological~2 GeV tagged

Page 6: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 6

MW in ttjetsMW in ttjets• Consider 4 most energetic jets, not matched to b-quark

At least one is not matched to W-decay product

Both jets matched to W-decay products80GeV

80GeV

tt1jNj=5

Page 7: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 7

MW in tt+jetsMW in tt+jets• 4 and only 4 jets• Mass of two jets

– Not matched to b-quark

– At least one is not matched to W-decay product

<MW>=86 GeVtt0j

tt1j

tt2j

<MW>=95 GeV

<MW>=97 GeV

200 GeV

Page 8: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 8

MW in tt+jetsMW in tt+jets• 5 and only 5 jets

• Consider only 4 most energetic jets

• Mass of two jets

• Not matched to b-quark

• At least one is not matched to W-decay product

<MW>=92 GeVtt0j

tt1j

tt2j

<MW>=104 GeV

<MW>=108 GeV

200 GeV

Page 9: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 9

Effect on HitFitEffect on HitFit

• Christian Schmitt

Chi2 from tt0jChi2 from tt1j

Page 10: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 10

NjetsNjets

• Each process can produce a spectrum of jet multiplicities

• How do we combine tt0j,tt1j,tt2j?

tt0j tt1j

tt2j

<Nj>=3.3 <Nj>=3.7

<Nj>=4.1

Page 11: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 11

Approach #1: weighted sumApproach #1: weighted sum• Add processes straight up, weighted by cross

section*selection efficiency:– Add contributions of tt0j, tt1j, tt2j

– Double counting because tt0j includes radiation by Pythia

  tt0j tt1j tt2j

eff, % 13.9% 19.5% 23.3%

sigma, pb 6 2.5 0.56

sigma*eff 0.834 0.4875 0.13048

relative weight 57% 34% 9%

Page 12: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 12

Approach #2: trust PythiaApproach #2: trust Pythia• If Pythia includes radiation why not just trust Pythia?

tt0j, extra jet produced by Pythia <Et>=35GeV

tt1j <Et>=44GeV

tt2j <Et>=46GeV

400 GeV

Pythia “radiation on-off” approach underestimates systematics!

Page 13: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 13

Approach #3: exclusive Approach #3: exclusive productionproduction

• tt0j for W+4jet bin, tt1j for W+5j, tt2j for W+6j

Relative conribution of jet multiplicities

-

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

3 4 5 6 7Njets

Fra

ction

tt0j onlyweighted sumexclusive matching

Page 14: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 14

Verification with dataVerification with data• Can constraint the fraction of ttj by measuring the

fraction of N(Nj>=5)/N(Nj>=4)

-

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

1

method

N(J>=5)/N(J>=4)

Pythia

weighted sum

exclusive matching

double tagged data

Page 15: Effect of extra jets on top mass measurement

12/04/04 Regina Demina, Top mass workshop 15

How to assess systematics on top How to assess systematics on top massmass

• Use Njets distribution of single and double tagged data to fit for the fraction of tt+nj– Open question: should we let the absolute cross section

float?

• Vary the mixture within uncertainty and extract top mass

• With higher statistics additional information can be used to constraint the fraction of ttnj:– MW, Pt(top), Pt(ttbar), phi (t-tbar) – Jiri’s talk