EFFECT OF BIO-POLYMER LATEX ON COATED PAPER Submitted by : N. Srikanth Date : 18 -5-2009.
-
Upload
shauna-lloyd -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
6
Transcript of EFFECT OF BIO-POLYMER LATEX ON COATED PAPER Submitted by : N. Srikanth Date : 18 -5-2009.
EFFECT OF BIO-POLYMER LATEX ON COATED PAPER
Submitted by : N. SrikanthDate : 18 -5-2009
Topics 1. Overview 2. Objectives3. Methodology4. Results5. Conclusion 6. Recommendations 7. Question & Answer
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Why is Paper Coated?
Overview
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Why is Paper Coated?1. Printability
- Improved Smoothness
- Uniform Coating
- Better Ink Receptivity
2. Visual Properties
- Improved Brightness
- Better Opacity and Gloss
3. Functionality- Reduction in ink consumption
- Better Glue ability
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Different Coating methods
Base Sheet
Coating
Base Sheet
Coating
Level Coating - Good smoothness
Contour Coating- Better Coverage
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Coating Components
• Pigment (85-95 wt %)
(GCC and Clay)
• Binder (5-15%)
• Water• Sodium Hydroxide• Lubricant• Defoamer
• Thickener (Rheology Modifier)• Dye• Optical Brightener (OBA)• Cross-linker• Dispersant
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Synthetic Binders• Different types of Synthetic polymers
– Styrene butadiene– Polyvinyl acetate– Vinyl acrylic– Acrylic latex– Polyvinyl alcohol
• Synthetic binders helps to improve final sheet properties like– Gloss – Smoothness– Printability
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
What is Biopolymer latex
Biopolymer NanoparticlesEx. Native Starch Granules
Effective surface>200 m2/g (est.)
30 µm
200 nm
Size reduced300-600x
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Advantage of Biopolymer latex • Effect on Environment
- Substitute to synthetic latex- Reduced GHG emission- Clean and lean manufacturing - Satellite production plant close to customer- No volatile organic compound- Reduced carbon foot print- Easy to start the production process
• Addition of Bio polymer latex improves final sheet property like,
- Increase in dry pick strength, - Reduces print mottle, - Increase in pore volume, good glue ability. - Increase in paper stiffness.
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Preparation of Biopolymer latex
Submitted by : N. SrikanthSource :Tappi paper 360 magazine.
Water-Swollen, CrosslinkedBiopolymer Core: V(Core)
Bound and AdsorbedBiopolymer Shell: V(Shell)
The Hypothesized Structure of a Water-Swollen, Crosslinked Biopolymer Nanoparticle
The biopolymer latex has a small hairy water soluble starch polymer in the surface , sterically stabilized protective colloidal layer which is cross linked with insoulblizer like glyoxal or AZC.
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Dispersion range of latexParticle Size Measurements
10 nm 100 nm 1000 nm1 µm
10,000 nm10 µm
100,000 nm100 µm
Bio- polymer range of emulsions
Bio- polymer in Dry paper coat
PV
Ac
SB R Sta
rch
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Film formation of Bio polymer latex
Free-FlowingDispersion
Entanglement & in-solubilizationat the particle interfaces
Drying/Compaction
Gelation/Immobilization
Water liberates, but biopolymer cores do not collapse and form “nano-cellular foam-like” film, yielding air
voids
Particle Deformation & Further Coalescence
ConsolidationWith Partial Collapse
Aqueous dispersion of water-swollen biopolymer nano-particles
Stiff water-swollen cross-linked biopolymer nano-particles do not collapse much during film formation. Consequently, film shrinkage is much less than starch and more like S/B latex, yielding better gloss and improved opacity under optimized calendering conditions.
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Objectives
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
1) Replacing Synthetic binder SB and SA latex with Bio polymer latex LA 40 in an increment of 25% up to 100% ,while keeping other coating receipe components constant.
2) Comparing properties of coating color, surface and printing properties of coated paper i.e. Control formulation vs. combination of SB ,SA latex and Bio polymer latex formulation.
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Methodology
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Test formulationReference(Control Sample )
Description units SB Latex SA latex Bio latex
Pigment Parts 100 100 100
synthetic latex Parts 12 12 12
Bio polymer latex Parts 0 0 0
CMC Parts 0.5 0.5 0
Total Parts 112.5 112.5 112
Set #1 ( SB latex +Bio polymer latex)
Description units #1 #2 #3
Pigment Parts 100 100 100
synthetic latex(styrene butadiene) Parts 9 6 3
Bio polymer latex Parts 3 6 9
CMC Parts 0.5 0.5 0.5
Total Parts 112.5 112.5 112.5
Set #2 ( SA Latex +Bio Polymer latex)
Description units #1 #2 #3
Pigment Parts 100 100 100
synthetic latex(styrene acrylate) Parts 9 6 3
Bio polymer latex Parts 3 6 9
CMC Parts 0.5 0.5 0.5
Total Parts 112.5 112.5 112.5
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Calculation of chemicals dosage as per recipes
Make down of recipe
Dispersion of chemical
Chemical preparation
Check Printing properties.
Testing of coated paper 1. Coat weight2. Brightness3. opacity4. IGT pick5. PPS6. Porosity7. caliper8. Gloss
Drying of coated paper
Test for base paper
1. Basis weight2. Moisture3. Ash %4. Thickness5. Density6. Porosity7. PPS8. Tensile9. Brightness10. opacity
Additive addition1. Synthetic binder2. Lubricant.3. OBA
Preparation of binder/Co binder
1.CMC .(10% solution)2.Ready to use Bio-polymer latex (40% solution)
Making coated paper.
Testing of coating color.1. pH value.2. Solids content3. Viscosity (cps)4. Water retention
Chemical testing1. pH value2. Solids content3. moisture4. Viscosity5. Appearance
Super calendering of coated paper
Testing of coated paper
1. Brightness2. Opacity3. IGT pick4. PPS 5. Porosity6. Caliper7. Gloss
Target coat weight 11 +/- 0.5 gsm
Testing of coated paper
1. Print Gloss2. Wet pick3. Wet Repellence4. Set off5. ISIT6.Print density
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Results
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Water retention of coating color
Water Retention Value of coating color
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
12 parts (100%) 9 latex /3 Bio parts(25%sub)
6/6 pph latex/Bio (50%sub)
3 latex /9 Bio parts(75%sub)
Ratio of binder
g/m
2 .
Biopolymer LA 40 SBR HPT 129 Acronal HPT 134
SC Paper PPS @ 160 kN/m
0.88
0.9
0.92
0.94
0.96
0.98
1
1.02
1.04
1.06
12 parts (100%) 9 latex /3 Bio parts(25%sub)
6/6 pph latex/Bio (50%sub)
3 latex /9 Bio parts(75%sub)
Ratio of binder
µm
Bio-polymer- LA 40 CAL Acronal HPT 134 Cal SBR HPT 129
Uncalendered Paper K& N Ink Receptivity
0
5
10
15
20
25
12 parts (100%) 9 latex /3 Bio parts(25%sub)
6/6 pph latex/Bio (50%sub)
3 latex /9 Bio parts(75%sub)
Ratio of Binder
%
Bio-polymer- LA 40 UNCal SBR HPT 129 UN CAL Acrylate HPT 134
Increased water retention by 50% to 100% Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Bio polymer and SB latex
Wet Void Volume - coating colorWet void volume of coating color
0
10
20
30
40
50
12 parts (100%) 9 latex /3 Bioparts(25% sub)
6/6 pph latex/Bio (50%sub)
3 latex /9 Bioparts(75% sub)
Ratio of binder
W.V
.V
Biopolymer LA 40 Acronal HPT 134 SBR HPT 129
Increase in Wet void volume value by 6% to 25%.
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Viscosity of coating color
Viscosity of coating color.
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
12 parts (100%) 9 latex /3 Bioparts(25% sub)
6/6 pph latex/Bio(50% sub)
3 latex /9 Bioparts(75% sub)
Ratio of binder
cps
Biopolymer LA 40 SBR HPT 129 Acronal HPT 134
Increase in viscosity of color by 50%- 100% . Submitted by : N. Srikanth
PPS roughness of SC paper SC Paper PPS @ 160 kN/m
0.880.9
0.920.940.960.98
11.021.041.06
12 parts (100%) 9 latex /3 Bioparts(25% sub)
6/6 pph latex/Bio(50% sub)
3 latex /9 Bioparts(75% sub)
Ratio of binder
Bio-polymer- LA 40 CAL Acronal HPT 134 Cal SBR HPT 129
Marginal increase in PPS value by 5% - 10% Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Brightness of SC paper
Super Calendered Paper Brightness
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
12 parts (100%) 9 latex /3 Bio parts(25% sub) 6/6 pph latex/Bio (50% sub) 3 latex /9 Bio parts(75% sub)Ratio of Binder
Bio-polymer- LA 40 Cal SBR HPT 129 CAL Acronal HPT 134
No difference in brightness value of coated paper
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Opacity of SC paper
No or slight difference in the opacity value of the paper
Super Calendered Paper Opacity
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
12 parts (100%) 9 latex /3 Bio parts(25%sub)
6/6 pph latex/Bio (50%sub)
3 latex /9 Bio parts(75%sub)
Ratio of binder
%
Bio-polymer- LA 40 Cal SBR HPT 129 CAL Acronal HPT 134
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Dry pick of coated paper
Dry pick of coated paper(MD)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
m/s
uncalendered
calendered
Increase in Dry pick strength by 40%.Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Delta gloss of printed paper
Increase in Delta gloss (print snap) by 50%
Delta Gloss
02468
10121416
(A) 1
2 pp
hSB
R(1
00%
),
(B)1
2pp
h SA
(100
%),
(C
)12
pph
LA40
(100
%),
(A) 9
/3 p
phSB
R/L
A40(
25%
sub)
(B
) 6/6
pph
SBR
/LA4
0(50
%su
b),
(
C) 3
/9 p
phSB
R/L
A40(
75%
sub)
,
(A) 9
/3 p
phSA
/LA4
0(25
%su
b),
(
B) 6
/6 p
phSA
/LA4
0(50
%su
b),
( C
) 3/9
pph
SA/L
A40(
75%
sub)
%
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Customer Savings Reference #1 #2 #3
Pigment Parts 100 100 100 100
synthetic latex Parts 12 9 6 3
Bio polymer latex Parts 0 3 6 9
CMC Parts 1 0.5 0.2 0
Total Parts 113 112.5 112.2 112
Basepaper gsm 40 40 40 40
Coat weight gsm 20 20 20 20
Total gsm 60 60 60 60
MT/yr Total binder Cost (US$ Million)
Paper production 300,000 $23.40 $22 $21.10 $20.30
Estimated Annual savings US $M $1.40 $2.30 $3.00
% 6% 11% 15%
Bio latex Substitution level 0% 24% 49% 75%
Cost saving Sheet
Potential annual cost saving is from 6% to 15%.Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Environment consideration
Fossil content 1%
Mean Bio based Result: 1* as per ASTM D 6866 Proportions Bio based Vs Fossil Based indicated by 14 C content for SB latex
Mean Bio based Result: 99* as per ASTM D 6866 Proportions Bio based Vs Fossil Based indicated by 14 C content for Bio latex
Bio basedcontent 99%
Bio based content 1%
Fossil content 99%
For every 1 million lb of SB /SA latex3.3 million pounds (1,515 metric tons) of CO2 emissions
Biopolymer 37.5% substitution level of Industry wide would reduce CO2 emissions by 2.27 MMT equating to 600,000 cars off the road
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Features Benefits1 Substitute for latex binder Similar performance in coating colors
2 Requires no cooking Energy (steam) and labor savings
3 Modified biopolymer from starch Carbon neutral and Renewable resource
4 Lower latex cost Significant annual savings, Price stability, not linked to varying petroleum prices
5 Viscosity & ultra-high shear rheology = synthetic latex
Simple adjustment of existing coating recipe – similar or better runnability
6 Reduce rheological modifier Additional potential saving
7 Available dry or liquid Freight savings & formulation flexibility
8 Recyclability Reduced batch time and saving in power.
9 Effluent system No shock load and good nutrient for the system.
Benefits of Bio polymer latex
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Conclusion
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
• Increased water retention by 50% to 100%
• Increase in viscosity of color by 50%- 100%. • Marginal increase in PPS value by 5% - 10%.
• Increase in Delta gloss (print snap) by 50%
• Increase in Dry pick strength by 40%.
• Increase in Wet void volume value by 6% to 25%.
• No difference in brightness value of coated paper• Potential annual cost saving is from 6% to 15%.
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Conclusion
Properties of coating color Bio-polymer Latex LA 40 Synthetic Latex(SB,SA) LA40 /Synthetic Latexes(SB/SA)
Ease of Formulation
Water Retention
Air volume %
Density
Sediment volume
Viscosity
Properties of coated paper Bio-polymer Latex LA 40 Synthetic Latex(SB,SA) LA40 /Synthetic Latexes(SB/SA)
Gloss
Porosity
PPS
Thickness
porevolume
K&N
Dry Strength
Wet Strength
wet repellence
Print Gloss
Brightness w/o OBA
Print Density
Opacity
Ink tack rise
Increase No Change Decrease Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Summary
Recommendations
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
1) In all coating mill, all pre-coat formulation 100% Bio polymer latex LA 40 can be substituted in place of Synthetic binder SB and SA latex
2) In top coating formulation 25 -50% Bio polymer latex LA-40 can be substituted in place of synthetic SB and SA latex.
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Question ???
&
Answer !!!
Submitted by : N. Srikanth
Thanks
Dr. Mousa Nazhad, Asian Institute of Technology.
Dr.Esa Lehtinen, Asian Institute of Technology
Dr.Esa Viljakainen, Asian Institute of technology.
Dr.Robert Hill , IMERYS Ltd, UK.
Mr.Edwald Beivi , UPM Research centre, Changzhou ,China.
Ms.Zhang Homing , UPM Research center Changzhou, China.
Dr.H.Komoldin, Advanced Agro limited. Thailand.
Ms.Daroung Inthong, Siam Modified Starch co, Ltd.
Submitted by : N. Srikanth