EFCA - European Parliament · 2012. 7. 19. · EFCA -5 YEAR INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION &...

EFCA

5 YEAR INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION

&OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES

EP- COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES11 July 2012

EFCA - 5 YEAR INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION&

OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES

ContentI. Governance 5 year independent external evaluation report AB recommendationsDraft Multiannual Work Programme (MWP) 2013-2017 and Annual Work Programme (AWP) 2013

II. Operational activitiesJDPs state of playIII. The possible way forward

5 YEAR INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION REPORT

1st Evaluation of the 5 year term of the Agency: 2007 – 2011; 85 000 €

Council Regulation (EC) No 768/2005“Every five years the Administrative Board shall

commission an independent external evaluation of the implementation of this Regulation”

BackgroundBackground


Overall conclusion

“The evaluators’ overall assessment of the governance and performance of the CFCA1 is positive although there is scope for improvements.

On the whole, governance arrangements have worked well.

Considering the agency’s limited resources, its operation in the politically sensitive environment of fisheries policy, and current Member State budget constraints, performance against the evaluation criteria of relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability can be considered promising…”2

1.The Agency name changed to European fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) on January 2012

2. Community Fisheries Control Agency, five-year independent external evaluation, final report (page 116)


Evaluation MethodDesk research

Stakeholder consultations with 16 MS, EC, EP, ECA, EMSA,FRONTEX and 10 other organisations (RACs, NGOs)

Survey feedback from 20 Member State and 5 EC representatives (76%); 46 RAC members and other stakeholders (20%)


Evaluation report findings on performance3

Relevance: alignment of the activity with relevant policy priorities and needs at EU and MS level;

Efficiency: delivery of activities in line with schedules and resources, and on the general operation of the Agency;

Effectiveness and Impact: deal respectively with the achievement of immediate and more long-term objectives;

Sustainability: addresses issues related to the dissemination of knowledge and the integration of contents into MS systems and approaches.3.The Evaluation report also covered the intervention logic and governance


Performance – Relevance

9999999999


Performance – AB on Operational Coordination

9999999999


Performance – AB on Capacity Building

9999999999


Performance – Efficiency

9999999999


Performance –Effectiveness

9999999999


Performance – AB on Operational Coordination

9999999999


Performance – AB on Compliance

9999999999


Performance –Impact

9999999999


Performance –Sustainability

9999999999

ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

Following the 5 year independent external evaluation report

the seminar on the 5 year independent external evaluation of the Agency

Administrative Board recommendationsAdministrative Board recommendations

SUMMARY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARDRECOMMENDATIONS

Level playing field and coordination and assistance for better compliance are considered as wider objectives of the Agency;

Introduction of multi-species and continuous regional JDP with a solid legal basis and prioritisation;

Examine periodically at which level EFCA involvement in the JDPs provides the best added value, in accordance with the existing legal basis;

Establish a clear overarching road map for training, in particular the remaining areas of the Core Curricula, including the training of trainers;

SUMMARY OF THEADMINISTRATIVE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

Establishment of regional training for national inspectors, as well as Union inspectors;

Implement the recently prepared method for assessing the performance of the JDPs after discussion at regional level;

Development of indicators for measuring the effectiveness of capacity building;

Develop a method for assessing cost effectiveness for Member States;

SUMMARY OF THEADMINISTRATIVE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

Show-case EFCA best practice on inter-agency and national agencies cooperation, and share EFCA experience on performance indicators for measuring administrative efficiency and effectiveness;

Annual stock-taking of scientific evidence on developments with the fish stocks that the EFCA is focusing on. Consider scientific bodies request for access to data for scientific purposes;

EFCA and the EC to study ways of exchanging data on compliance with the Common Fisheries Policy requirements, in accordance with data ownership requirements of Member States;

SUMMARY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

Administrative Board to focus on strategic issues, leaving routine matters to be decided by written procedure;

The Board should reflect on the participation of other parties in the Administrative Board;

It is too premature to propose an amendment of Agency regulation. Nevertheless a guidance document with clear description of responsibilities delimitation between EFCA, EC, and MS is recommended.

Draft MWP 2013-2017 & AWP 2013

Considering the overarching objectives of sustainability, compliance, level playing field and available resources the Agency will concentrate on the core tasks in 2013 -2017:

1. Multiannual positive priorities

2. Multiannual negative priorities

Proposed positive priorities1.1- Operational CoordinationSucceed in implementing the evolution towards regional, multispecies Joint Deployment Plans in force and coordination of control activities of Black Sea Member States. The process will require:

Improving regional risk management;

Assessment of impact of control activities;

Reflections on the possible introduction of scientific input in the current JDP risk management and on controllability, intelligence and data analysis/cross checking in the JDP framework;

Draft MWP 2013-2017 & AWP 2013

Proposed positive priorities1.2.- Capacity Building

a) Training: inter alia core curricula

b) Support Member States, European Commission and horizontal agency activities:

development of ICT projects (ERS, FISHNET, JADE, training platform, ICT mapping platform and EIR);

Common fisheries Policy (CFP) reform inter alia discard ban;

Maritime surveillance and new technologies based on the evaluation of the pilot project

Acquisition of means for the Member States.

Draft MWP 2013-2017 & AWP 2013

Proposed positive priorities

1.3.- Cooperation with Third Countries on Commission request

Operational cooperation with Norway (and maybe Faeroes and Iceland) could be considered in the North Sea, and Pelagic Western Waters JDPs;

Russia in the Baltic Sea and NAFO-NEAFC, Canada and USA;

Mediterranean third countries.

Draft MWP 2013-2017 & AWP 2013

Draft MWP 2013-2017 & AWP 2013

EFCA Budget (€)

Expenditure(€)

BUDGET 2011

BUDGET 2012

DB 2013

DB2014-2017

Title I (Staff) 6,047,000 6,225,000 6,329,000 TBDTitle II (Administrative costs)

1,233,000 1,279,359 1,175,359 TBD

Title III (Operational costs)

5,570,000 1,712,541 1,712,541 TBD

Total expenditure

12,850,000 9,216,900 9,216,900 TBD

Budget ExecutionEvolution

OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES

EP- COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES11 July 2012

JDPs state of playJDPs 2012 – Data 1st Semester

JDP NAFO/NEAFC BALTIC SEA

NORTH SEA

PELAGIC WW

BLUEFIN TUNA

TOTAL

Number of inspections 82 2096 1822 923 372 52955295

Cases infringement 6 100 108 85 33 332332

TYPE OF INFRINGEMENT DETECTEDTYPE OF INFRINGEMENT DETECTEDINSPECTIONS CONDITIONS 1 6 8 1 1616

LICENCING 1 8 6 12 2727TECHNICAL MEASURES 1 15 36 4 7 6363

CONSERVATION MEASURES 3 10 21 11 4545

REPORTING 29 32 77 14 152152NATIONAL MEASURES 38 5 1 4444

JDPs state of play JDPs Ratio of infringements vs

inspections (2007-2012 up to 30th June)

JDPs state of play JDPs Number of inspections(2007- 2012 up to 30th June)

JDPs state of play BFT JDP - Pooled Means until June 2012

Western Med Central Med Eastern Med Eastern Atl

High Seas Patrol Vessels 1 3 - -

Coastal Patrol Vessels 9 5 6 -

Airplanes/Helicopters 5 4 2 -

High Seas Patrol Vessels 4

Coastal Patrol Vessels 20

Airplanes/Helicopters 11

Number of means deployed

Number of means deployed in each area

128 ICCAT inspectors participate to missions coordinated by the JDP

JDPs state of play BLUEFIN TUNA JDP 2012

Joint Activities 2012 (1st Half)Mediterranean and Atlantic

Vessels inspected

Vessels inspected with at least 1 infringement found

Joint Campaign 2012 SEA 241 23LAND 131 10TOTAL 372 33

In 2012, most possible infringements were related to technical measures (by-catch of more than 5%), documentation (logbook, ITD, BCD, video) and misreporting.

TYPE OF INFRINGEMENTS DETECTED

TECHNICAL MEASURES LICENSING REPORTING

7 12 14

JDPs state of play Fused maritime data

(VMS, AIS, SAT AIS, incidents, tuna farms…)

VMS with expired ICCAT permit (on the way to port)

VMS with validICCAT permit

Fishing Vessel (AIS, no VMS)

JDPs state of play A global picture

in support to control operations

JDPs state of play Monitoring of fishing vessel behavior in

transit (entering Med on the way to Suez)

AIS position (reported)

Voyage projection (not reported)

THE WAY FORWARD

Support on the implementation of the Control Regulation (e.g.: traceability,...) and CFP reform;

EFCA as “body designated”;

Coordination of Member Sates data management systems;

The new SCIP approach.

THE POSSIBLE WAY FORWARD

THE POSSIBLE WAY FORWARD

THE WAY FORWARD

THE WAY FORWARD

SCIP COOPERATION MODEL

AssessmentAssessmentAssessment

AssessmentAssessment

THANK [email protected]

http://www.efca.europa.eu

mailto:[email protected]

presentation_Savouret_20120711.ppt

EFCA - European Parliament · 2012. 7. 19. · EFCA -5 YEAR INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION &...

Documents

Transcript of EFCA - European Parliament · 2012. 7. 19. · EFCA -5 YEAR INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION &...