EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

29
IMS standards and 112 Fidel Liberal [email protected] 1

Transcript of EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

Page 1: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

IMS standards and 112

Fidel Liberal

[email protected]

1

Page 2: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

Outline

• Definition and description of IMS

– What?, When? and….

• … where and why (now) may IMS be important for PSAPs?

• Available standards

• Conclusions & recommendations

2

Page 3: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

IMS QUESTIONSDefinition and description of IMS

3

Page 4: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

IMS What?

• IP Multimedia Subsystem• 3GPP main standards

– TS 22.228 Service requirements for an IMS system.– TS 23.228 Architecture and main flows for an IMS system.– TS 24.229 IP multimedia call control protocol based on

Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Session DescriptionProtocol (SDP); Stage 3

– IETF• SIP RFC 3261• SDP RFC 3264• RTP RFC 1889• Diameter RFC 3588• Presence RFC 3856

4

Page 5: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

UnderlyingNetwork

Technology 1

UnderlyingNetwork

Technology 2

UnderlyingNetwork

Technology 3

TraditionalTelco

Internet“startup”

IP

IMS What?

OTT overlayIMS

P-CSCF I-CSCF S-CSCF

HSS

MGCF

OMA SIMPLEPresence

RLS

Presence

XDMS

E-CSCF

LRF

PCRF

PCEFMRFP

SGW

EmergencyCall

PCC(QoS) transcoding

Interfacing

Cross-ciphering

IBCF

CARRIER GRADEIMS CORETELCO FRIENDLY

MultimediaOTT for telcos

5

Page 6: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

IMS When?

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

An

alo

g

GSM

GP

RS

UM

TS R

99

R4

R5

R6

R7

LTE

R8

R9

R1

0

R1

1

R1

2

R1

3

CIRCUITSWITCHING

VOICE CSDATA PS

DECOUPLINGNO CS

6

Page 7: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

…IS (NOW) IMPORTANT FOR PSAPS?

WHERE AND WHY

7

Page 8: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

Regular/Prioritized access on

commercial networks

ESINET

PSAPs 112/911Call

takers/Dispatchers

Emergency ControlCentres Authorities

Volunteers

Victims

Witnesses

PSTN

2G/3G

VoIP overPublic Access

Other/NG

First Responders

NG FR

ESINETESINET

Citizens to AuthorityAmong PSAPsAmong FRsPSAPs/Authorities FRsOther technologiesPSAPs Other AuthoritiesAuthorities to Citizens

Surveillance/Sensors

PMR

Other Technologies

(NG)112 in the Emergency Communication Ecosystem

8

Page 9: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

Volunteers

ESINET

PSAPs 112/911Call

takers/DispatchersVictims

Emergency ControlCentres

Witnesses

PSTN

2G/3G

VoIP overPublic Access

Other/NG

ESINETESINET

(NG)112 in the Emergency Communication Ecosystem

9

Page 10: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

First Responders

PSAPs 112/911Call

takers/Dispatchers

Surveillance/Sensors

Victims Volunteers

Authorities

Witnesses

PSTN

SDH/ATM/..

SS7

Acc

ess

Net

wo

rkTr

ansp

ort

Net

wo

rk

Co

ntr

ol/

Sign

allin

g

Voice

Serv

ice

Phone

Dev

ice

LLCTETRA

AI

SwMI

TETRAMLE

Voice callPTTSDS

TETRAterminal

MMI

XDSLCABLEFTTH

Agg.MPLS

IP

Prop/SIP

VoiceMultime

dia

VoIPAPP/

Phone

GERAN/UTR

AN

SGSN/GGSN

AAL5-ATM/IP

RRCRANA

PSSCP

VoiceSMSMMS

CellPhone

TETRAPOL

AI

SwMI

TETRAPOL

TLCC

MM

Voice callPTT

Data Poll

TETRAPOL

terminal

GPRS/UMTS

WiMAXPMROther

AccessDependant

Many

DataVideoeCALL

SensorVideoeCALL

IVS

PSTN

SDH/ATM/..

SS7

Voice

Phone

Prop/SIP

VoiceMultime

dia

VoIPAPP/

Phone

GERAN/UTR

AN

SGSN/GGSN

AAL5-ATM/IP

RRCRANA

PSSCP

VoiceSMSMMS

VoIPAPP/

Phone

P25

CAI

RFSS

P25NMMM

Voice callPTTData

P25

terminal

Many

ManyTowards IP

Many

VoiceMCV

eCALL

IntegratedControlRoom

XDSLCABLEFTTH

Agg.MPLS

IP

IMS Where and Why now?

10

Page 11: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

IMS Where and Why now?

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

An

alo

g

GSM

GP

RS

UM

TS R

99

R4

R5

R6

R7

LTE

R8

R9

R1

0

R1

1

R1

2

R1

3

CIRCUITSWITCHING

VOICE CSDATA PS

DECOUPLINGNO CS

CS-FALLBACK

SV-LTE

11

Page 12: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

Acc

ess

Net

wo

rkTr

ansp

ort

Net

wo

rk

Co

ntr

ol/

Sign

allin

gSe

rvic

e

Phone

Dev

ice TETRA

terminalMMI

VoIPAPP/

Phone

CellPhone

TETRAPOL

terminal

SensorVideoeCALL

IVS

PhoneVoIPAPP/

Phone

VoIPAPP/

Phone

P25

terminal

IntegratedControlRoom

Rugged“SMART

PHONE”

SMARTPHONE

OT

TIP

PSTN

SDH/ATM/..

SS7

Voice

LLCTETRA

AI

SwMI

TETRAMLE

Voice callPTTSDS

XDSLCABLEFTTH

Agg.MPLS

IP

Prop/SIP

VoiceMultime

dia

GERAN/UTR

AN

SGSN/GGSN

AAL5-ATM/IP

RRCRANA

PSSCP

VoiceSMSMMS

TETRAPOL

AI

SwMI

TETRAPOL

TLCC

MM

Voice callPTT

Data Poll

GPRS/UMTS

WiMAXPMROther

AccessDependant

Many

DataVideoeCALL

PSTN

SDH/ATM/..

SS7

Voice

Prop/SIP

VoiceMultime

dia

GERAN/UTR

AN

SGSN/GGSN

AAL5-ATM/IP

RRCRANA

PSSCP

VoiceSMSMMS

P25

CAI

RFSS

P25NMMM

Voice callPTTData

Many

ManyTowards IP

Many

VoiceMCV

eCALL

XDSLCABLEFTTH

Agg.MPLS

IP

EPCIP

IMS

MCPTT

EUTRAN

EPCIP

IMS

VoLTE

EUTRAN

IMS Where and Why now?

First Responders

PSAPs 112/911Call

takers/Dispatchers

Surveillance/Sensors

Victims Volunteers

Authorities

Witnesses

12

Page 13: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

Current status• VoLTE

• Next Generation Public Safety over LTE– Firstnet US – ESMCP UK– Europe

• Study on 'Use of commercial mobile networks and equipment for "mission-critical" high-speed broadband communications in specific sectors'

• DRS-18

– South Korea SafeNet

Source: http://www.gsma.com/network2020/resources/all-ip-statistics/

13

Page 14: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

IMS STANDARDISATION3GPP

14

Page 15: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

Standards

• Different SDOs and areas

– 3GPP emergency calling

– NG112/NG911 & IMS @ATIS

– 3GPP and NG PS

– IMS ecall

– ETSI Total Conversation

15

Page 16: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

P-CSCF E-CSCF

S-CSCF

LRF

UE Gm Mw

MI

Mw

Mm/Mw

from PSAP

Mi/Mg

Mm

Le (e.g. E2)

to PSAP or ECS

via IP multimedia

Network

to PSAP

(via PSTN

via BGCF/

MGCF)

from PSAP

Evolution of emergency calling in 3GPP TS 23.167

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

R8

R11

R12

2016 2017

R13

R14

R7

R9

R10

LTE specific supportSession Continuity

(use of EATF)

Hosted Enterprise Services and

Private Networks (use of AS)

NOVES outcomesDifferent media types

Dynamic PCC

WLAN untrusted access

to EPC

eCall IMSEnhanced

indoor/outdoor location

ARCHUMTS PS and CS

LCSI-WLANNENA I2

16

Page 17: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

R7

R10

R9

Evolution of emergency calling in 3GPP TS 23.167

P-CSCF E-CSCF

S-CSCF

LRF

UEGm Mw

MI

Mw

Mm/Mw

from PSAP

Mi/Mg

Mm

Le (e.g. E2)

to PSAP or ECSvia IP multimedia

Network

to PSAP(via PSTNvia BGCF/

MGCF)

from PSAP

P-CSCF E-CSCF

S-CSCF

LRF

UEGm Mw

MI

Mw

Mm/Mw

from PSAP

Mi/Mg

Mm

Le (e.g. E2)

to PSAP or ECSvia IP multimedia

Network

to PSAP(via PSTNvia BGCF/

MGCF)

from PSAP

EATF

I4

from I-CSCFI5

P-CSCF E-CSCF

S-CSCF

LRF

UEGm Mw

MI

Mw

Mm/Mx/Mw

from PSAP

Mi/Mg

Mm/Mx

Le (e.g. E2)

to PSAP or ECS(via IBCF/IPmultimediaNetwork)

to PSAP(via PSTNvia BGCF/

MGCF)

from PSAP

EATF

I4

from I-CSCFI5

From AS

ISC/Mw

From privatenetwork viaIBCF-I-CSCF Mx/Mw

Mw

17

Page 18: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

Analysis / Discussion

• 3GPP specifies its own comprehensive / standalone system for emergencycalling• Specific support for different access technologies (procedures,

location…)• If PSAP is IMS user, CSCF can determine the route

• Otherwise, use a default exit point?• Some (old) interoperability with NENA i2• Keeps integrating new features

• NG112 LTD• ESInet as the core network, with BCF as entry point• PSAPs connected to the ESInet (directly or through access networks)• IMS as another access network

• Signalling / media issues?• QoS / policy issues?• Location: trusted? Access from external PSAP to LRF?

18

Page 19: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

3GPP Public Safety Communications• Triggered by Public Safety administrations

• Huge effort to finish specifications in R13 (target freeze date: March 2016)

• Evolution– Stage 2 high level architecture

• SIP core, non IMS specific, but similar external interfaces

– Stage 3 protocol specifications• Mainly IMS-related protocol specifications

– “IMS Profile to support Mission Critical Push To Talk over LTE”

19

Page 20: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

3GPP MCPTT Related SA Documents (R13, SA#71, March 2016)

Doc. Code Contents Vers. Resp.

3GPP TS 22.179 Requirements (Stage 1)13.3.0

(12-2015)S1

3GPP TR 23.779 Technical options - study and evaluation13.0.0

(09-2015)S6

3GPP TS 23.179Architecture, procedures and information flows (Stage 2)

13.1.0(03-2016)

S6

3GPP TR 26.879MCPTT media handling and codecs (key issues) -study and evaluation

13.0.0(12-2015)

S4

3GPP TS 26.346 MBMS protocols and codecs13.4.0

(03-2016)S4

3GPP TS 26.179 MCPTT media handling and codecs13.0.0

(03-2016)S4

3GPP TR 33.879MCPTT security aspects(key issues) - study and evaluation

13.0.0(03-2016)

S3

3GPP TS 33.179 MCPTT security framework13.0.0

(03-2016)S3

20

Page 21: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

3GPP MCPTT Related SA Documents (R13, SA#71, March 2016)

Doc. Code Contents Vers. Resp.

3GPP TS 24.379MCPTT call control protocol specification 13.0.1

(03-2016)C1

3GPP TS 24.380 MCPTT floor control protocol specification13.0.2

(03-2016)C1

3GPP TS 24.381 MCPTT group management protocol specification13.0.1

(03-2016)C1

3GPP TS 24.382MCPTT identity management protocol specification

13.0.1(03-2016)

C1

3GPP TS 24.383 MCPTT Management Object (MO)13.0.1

(03-2016)C1

3GPP TS 24.384MCPTT configuration management; Protocol specification

13.0.1(03-2016)

C4

3GPP TS 24.980IMS Profile to support Mission Critical Push To Talk over LTE

13.0.1(03-2016)

C1

21

Page 22: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

NG911 and IMS

• ATIS

Source: http://www.911.gov/pdf/NG911-Standards-Identification-Analysis_03222016.pdf

22

Page 23: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

IMS eCALL

• ETSI TR 103 140– STF456

• Why we do it:– eCall is being deployed on 2G and 3G networks but these will not last forever. Already there are 4G networks,

and cooperative ITS is on the horizon.

• How we do it:– We are making proposals to 3GPP to show how eCall could be specified for 4G. We are considering how eCall

would migrate to 4G and ITS, and in this respect we make presentations to as many eCall stakeholderorganisations as possible (e.g. EeIP, HeERO, CEN TC 278, ETSI TC ITS, ISO TC204) to get their views.

• RATIONALE– In band eCALL not long lasting solution when compared with cars lifetime

23

Page 24: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

UID code title%

doneRelease

lead Group

WIDlast updat

edremarks

impacts

700020 EIEIEvolution to and Interworking with eCall in IMS

12% Rel-14 SP-1502752015-06-09

12/15: created byMCC todistinguishStage 1 fromStage 2

22.101

680004Stage 1 of Evolutionto and Interworkingwith eCall in IMS

100% Rel-14 S1 SP-1502751970-01-01

22.101

700021 -Stage 2 of Evolutionto and Interworkingwith eCall in IMS

20% Rel-14 S2 SP-1506231970-01-01

7/3/16: 0%->20

23.167, 23.401

710020EIEI-CT

CT aspects of evolution to and interworking with

0% Rel-14 C6, C1 CP-1600531970-01-01

IMS eCALL (3GPP)

• The objective of this work item is to specify the system impacts for an eCall based on IMS emergency calls that will allow for enhanced eCall user experience and functionality, and for the long-term phase out of CS core and access networks. The work will be based on service requirements defined by WI EIEI in SA1 and captured in TS 22.101.

• Based on stage-1 requirements at least the following work is identified for SA2 so far:• TS 23 401: introduce eCall for EPS and define its impact on the procedures.• - TS 23.167: provide architectural and other stage 2 support.• Support of eCall based on IMS Emergency Services is expected to make use of the requirements captured in TS

22.101.• Support of eCall on IMS Emergency Services using the PS domain is only considered over LTE. eCall in CS mode or

using ICS procedures will be used when in GSM, or UMTS RATs, and is not in the scope of this work item.

24

112eCALL

Page 25: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

ETSI total conversation

• STF 489

– TR 103.201 Implementation Guidelines

25

Page 26: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

ETSI total conversation

• Identification and invocation of assisting relay service– Issue #1: Invoking the conference for inclusion of an assisting relay service

• Solution #3: Conference invocation in the ESInet

– Issue #2: Indicating/identifying the communication needs of the Total Conversation user• Solution #4: Use of Additional Data to indicate communication needs and / or a specific

relay service

– Issue #3: Emergency session handling at the assisting relay service• Solution #5: include a SIP priority tag in the call to the assisting relay service to indicate

its emergency status

– Issue #4: Obtaining the identity of a specific assisting service• Solution #2: Identity communicated by the Total Conversation user terminal

– Issue #5: Total Conversation user default behaviour

• Automatic translation– Solution #2: Automatic translation at the Total Conversation user terminal

26

Page 27: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

Conclusions

2 G/3 G

CSFB

Evangelist

Tradit ional

PM ROt her

VoIP

Flavour

27

112eCALL

Page 28: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

…. recommendations

28

• IMS is a worth considering zombie technology

• Gaining momentum• Haters gonna hate

– Overengineered– Telco only– “…..Just another” SIP technology

• LEGAL Disclaimer AKA “excusatio non petita accusation manifiesta”– Final reality may vary due to different factors*

* Including but not limited to technical issues, (un)intentionally incorrect publicly available info, my cognitive bias, market drivers, lobbying, telco/PS company cartel, political corruption, financial crisis…

Page 29: EENA 2016 - Standards Update (2/3)

Fidel [email protected]

Want to know more?

www.nemergent.com