동봉과 탄소블록의 접지 임피던스의...

6
2014 년도 한국철도학회 춘계학술대회 논문집 KSR2014S186 동봉과 탄소블록의 접지 임피던스의 경년변화 Seasonal Variation of Ground Impedance for a Copper-rods and a Carbon-block 김선재 * , 정기우 * , 왕국명 * , 길경석 *† Sun-Jae Kim * , Gi-Woo Jeong * , Guoming Wang * , Gyung-Suk Kil *Abstract This paper described the seasonal variation of ground impedance for a copper-rods and a carbon block buried in the ground. Ground impedance was measured by the fall of potential method specified in IEEE Std. 81 and by the application of a fast-rise step impulse, a 8/20us standard lightning impulse and a square waveform for 2 years periodically. Comparatively, ground impedance as ages showed no difference for the last 2 years, and ground impedance of the carbon block was lower at the square waveform and was higher at the fast-rise step impulse than that of the copper-rods. Keywords : Copper-rods, Carbon-block, Ground impedance, Fall of potential method, Seasonal variation 본 논문에서는 동봉과 탄소블록을 매설하여 접지 임피던스의 경년변화에 관하여 기술 하였다. 접지 임피던스는 IEEE Std. 81의 전위강하법으로 급준파, 8/20us 표준 뇌임펄스 및 구 형파로 2년 동안 주기적으로 측정하였다. 접지 임피던스는 지난 2년간 큰 변화는 없었으며, 탄소블록의 접지 임피던스는 동봉에 비해 구형파에서는 낮게, 그리고 급준파에서는 높게 나타 났다. 주요어 : 동봉, 탄소블록, 접지 임피던스, 전위강하법, 경년변화 1. 서 론 전자제어장비 및 전력설비가 과도전류에 노출되면 기기의 오동작 또는 파손으로 인해 정 보가 손실되며, 인체에 매우 위험하다. 전력수요가 증가하고 다양한 전력설비의 높은 신뢰 성이 요구되면서 단락사고, 낙뢰 및 지락 등에 의해서 발생되는 고장전류 및 과도전류에 대 한 예방기술이 필요하다. 접지는 위험전류를 대지로 흘려 전위상승을 억제함으로써 각종 전 자, 통신장비 및 전력설비에서 발생되는 사고를 예방할 수 있다[1,2]. 접지 저항은 고장전류를 단시간 내에 대지로 흘려 보내야 되기 때문에 낮은 저항이 요구 되며, 이를 위하여 다양한 형태의 접지극이 개발되고 있다[3,4]. 일반적으로 접지 시스템의 성능은 1kHz 이하의 저주파 전류를 인가하여 평가되지만, 뇌격 또는 단락사고 등에 의해 발 생되는 과도전류는 접지선의 인덕턴스에 의한 전압강하, 대지의 정전용량 및 도체간의 유도 † 교신저자: 한국해양대학교 전기전자공학부([email protected]) * 한국해양대학교 전기전자공학과

Transcript of 동봉과 탄소블록의 접지 임피던스의...

  • 2014 KSR2014S186

    Seasonal Variation of Ground Impedance for a Copper-rods and a Carbon-block *, *, *, *

    Sun-Jae Kim*, Gi-Woo Jeong*, Guoming Wang*, Gyung-Suk Kil*

    Abstract This paper described the seasonal variation of ground impedance for a copper-rods and a carbon block buried in the ground. Ground impedance was measured by the fall of potential method specified in IEEE Std. 81 and by the application of a fast-rise step impulse, a 8/20us standard lightning impulse and a square waveform for 2 years periodically. Comparatively, ground impedance as ages showed no difference for the last 2 years, and ground impedance of the carbon block was lower at the square waveform and was higher at the fast-rise step impulse than that of the copper-rods.

    Keywords : Copper-rods, Carbon-block, Ground impedance, Fall of potential method, Seasonal variation

    . IEEE Std. 81 , 8/20us 2 . 2 , ,

    .

    : , , , ,

    1.

    , .

    ,

    .

    , [1,2].

    , [3,4].

    1kHz , ,

    : ([email protected])

    *

  • [5,6]. ,

    .

    . IEEE Std. 81 .

    2.

    2.1

    (R) (L), (C) . , [7]. Fig. 1 .

    Fig. 1 Definition of ground impedance to impulse

    ))(max(1 tZZ (1)

    )()(

    1

    12

    tItVZ (2)

    )()(

    2

    13

    tItVZ (3)

    )()(

    2

    24

    tItVZ (4)

    ; 1Z 2Z , 3Z 4Z ,

    .

    RZZZZ 4321 (5)

  • , 3Z (Effective surge impedance) .

    2.2

    Fig. 2 . (a) 1m, 10mm 0.3mm ~ 0.5mm . (b) 1m, 215mm , 40% . .

    (a) Copper-rod (b) Carbon-block

    Fig. 2 Photographs of ground electrodes

    2.3

    IEEE Std. 81.2 Fig. 3 .

    Fig. 3 Configuration of the experimental setup

    E(Earth) C(Current) 10m, E 61.8% P(Potential)

    . 3 1m , 0.8m E . , (8/20us) .

    . (0.1V/A) (500MHz, 1GS/s) .

    2.4

    2014 4 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 . , 1.14A, 174V . 4.9A, 350V 0.014A, 1.32V .

  • (a) Fast-rise step impulse (b) Standard lightning impulse (c) Square waveform

    Fig. 4 Typical waveforms of applied current and potential rise for the copper-rods

    1.2A, 185V ,

    5.1A, 330V 0.014A, 1.1V .

    (a) Fast-rise step impulse (b) Standard lightning impulse (c) Square waveform

    Fig. 5 Typical waveforms of applied current and potential rise for the carbon-block

    Table 1 .

    Table 1 Ground impedance against applied current

    Ground electrode

    Current source Copper-rods () Carbon-block ()

    Fast-rise step impulse 152.63 154.12

    Standard lightning impulse 71.43 64.71

    Square waveform 94.29 78.57

    2 , Fig. 6 . 3 , ,

    .

  • Gro

    und

    impe

    danc

    e (

    )

    Fig. 6 Seasonal variation of ground impedance

    3.

    2 . ,

    . ns, MHz .

    2013 4 , 1 2014 3 .

    .

    2012 (No.S2074384) .

    2013 (No.S2138505) .

    [1] I. F. Gonos, M. K. Antonioy, F. V. Topalis, I. A. Stathopulos (1998) Proceedings of the 6th

    International Conference and Exhibition on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipments(OPTIM98), pp.171~174

    [2] Chien-Hsing Lee, A. P. Sakis Meliopoulos (1999) A Comparison of IEC 479-1 and IEEE Std. 80 on Grounding Safety Criteria, Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC(A), 23(5), pp.612~621.

    [3] A. Geri, 1999, Behaviour of Grounding Systems Excited by High Impulse Currents: the Model and Its Validation, IEEE Trans. On Power Delivery, Vol.14, No.3, pp.1008~1017.

    [4] G. Vijayaraghavan, Mark Brown and Malcolm Barnes, 2004, Grounding, Bonding, Shielding and Surge Protection, Butterworth-Heinemann, United Kingdom, pp.62~78

  • [5] , , (1997) , , pp.203~218. [6] Ralph Morrison, Warren H. Lewis (1990) GROUNDING AND SHIELDING IN FACILITIES, John

    Wiley & Sons, pp.44~45. [7] I. F. Gonos, F. V. Topalis, I. A. Stathopulos (1999) Transient Impedance of Grounding Rods, High

    Voltage Engineering Symposium, 2(467), pp.272~275.

    /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description > /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ > /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ]>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice