Educational Technology Curriculum Committee Meeting – Next Steps Linda Carmona-Bell July 7, 2010.
-
Upload
darleen-fields -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of Educational Technology Curriculum Committee Meeting – Next Steps Linda Carmona-Bell July 7, 2010.
Educational Technology
Curriculum Committee Meeting – Next Steps
Linda Carmona-BellJuly 7, 2010
04/21/23 2
Agenda• Welcome & Introduction• NJDOE Information• Where are we now?• NAEP Discussion• Considerations for developing a new
tool• Committees• Wrap Up
04/21/23 3
Outcome
• Develop an action plan that lists our activities and corresponding timeline to provide full proposal to NJDOE administrators by the end of August.
Welcome
Introductions
information
CoSN – Consortium for School Networking
Data Decision Making International Initiative
news
NJDOE
http://www.state.nj.us/education/genfo/overview/orgchart.pdf
Title II, D – formula funding reimbursements
Organizational Chart -
update
NJDOE
Financial Literacy
Office of Educational Technology
Common Core Content Standards
04/21/23 8
Section I. Where are we now?
Desired Outcome
• All on the same page regarding the committee’s role – historically and presently
Educational Technology Curriculum Committee – Research, develop and recommend policies and resources to support the
integration of educational technology
within NJ school districts.
Where are we now?
04/21/23 10
•Committee designed and recommended NJTAP-IN process 2002-2007•November 2009 Meeting discussed direction to support districts in evaluating new technology standard.
Where are we now?
04/21/23 11
• Decided to move forward with developing tools for assessing both 8.1 – Educational Technology and 8.2 – Technology, Engineering and Design
• The NJTAP-IN Process remains the same with some tweaks
Where are we now?
Section II - Considerations for developing a new
tool
04/21/23 13
Outcome
• Understand the ramifications of developing a new tool in terms of available resources, school district concerns and “outside” influences
04/21/23 14
•Date assessment is to be in place
•Clarity – define “meeting 8.0 Standard”
•NJTAP-IN Process
Considerations for
developing a new tool
04/21/23 15
Clarity – define
“meeting 8.0 Standard”
• Meeting 8.0 Standard– Technologically
Proficient• Both 8.1 and 8.2
– Stages of proficiency– Other issues?
04/21/23 16
Definitions
• Technology – how people modify their modern world to suit their own purposes.
• Tech literacy – the diverse collection of processes and knowledge that people use to extend human abilities and to satisfy human needs and wants.
• Educational Technologyhttp://newlearninginstitute.org/
21stcenturyeducation/21st-century-learning/index.html
04/21/23 17
Assessing technology
Literacy: The case for an authentic,
project-based learning approach
White Paper
While battles over defining technological literacy continue to rage on, 49 of the 50 states have technology literacy goals and standards. Furthermore, across nearly all definitions of technological literacy, there is agreement that the construct is multi-dimensional and that the dimensions are interdependent and inseparable.
04/21/23 18
NJTAP-IN Process
• Reporting
• Review process– What needs to be
tweaked?
04/21/23 19
04/21/23 20
NEEDS
• Supporting Tools
• Rubric
• Professional Development Modules
All simultaneously
04/21/23 21
• We have existing tools – State, Local
• Depiction of materials – more graphics & less narrative
Considerations for
developing a new tool
04/21/23 22
04/21/23 23
• Committees– Modify
•Scope and sequence?
•Rubric
How
04/21/23 24
• Committees– revise the professional
development module
– review submitted assessment software that is intended to meet the needs of school districts and develop a process for reviews
How
04/21/23 25
COMMITTEE VOLUNTEERS?
• Rubric– Roseanne– Elise– Karen– Paulette
• PD– Kathleen– Richard– Kirstin– Charlette– Diana– Kathleen
04/21/23 26
Review “stuff”
Stephanie
Agnes
Linda
April
SECTION III – WRAP UP
04/21/23 28
Outcome
Develop clear timelines on when we have to do what we have to do
04/21/23 29
•Supporting Tools
•Rubric
•Professional Development Modules
All simultaneously
TIMELINES
04/21/23 30
Other Steps?
• generate a draft of the NJTAP-IN Rubric and an implementation guide – latest December 2010
• PILOT – go back to NJTAP pilot, and invite new (next spring> exempt from any assessment)
• Change Website – December 2011
04/21/23 31
NEXT MEETING? • At the beginning of October 2010