Education, Training and Equity - Eunec...Education, Training and Equity Anders Joest Hingel (Studies...
Transcript of Education, Training and Equity - Eunec...Education, Training and Equity Anders Joest Hingel (Studies...
Education, Training and EquityAnders Joest Hingel (Studies and Analyses)
Dg Education and Culture
European Commission
Education and Training in a Period of Economic Crisis
EUNEC SeminarLimassol, Cyprus, 31 May – 1 June 2010
Treaty – EducationArt. 165 (ex. 149)
1. The Community shall contribute to the development of quality education by encouraging cooperation between Member States and, if necessary, by supporting and supplementing their action, while fully respecting the responsibility of the Member States for the content of teaching and the organisation of education systems and their cultural and linguistic diversity.
2. Community action shall be aimed at:
- developing the European dimension in education, particularly through the teaching and dissemination of the languages of the Member States,
- encouraging mobility of students and teachers, by encouraging inter alia, the academic recognition of diplomas and periods of study,
- promoting cooperation between educational establishments,- developing exchanges of information and experience on issues
common to the education systems of the Member States,- encouraging the development of youth exchanges and of exchanges
of socioeducational instructors,- encouraging the development of distance education.
Treaty – EducationArt. 165 (ex. 149)
1. The Community shall contribute to the development of quality education by encouraging cooperation between Member States and, if necessary, by supporting and supplementing their action, while fully respecting the responsibility of the Member States for the content of teaching and the organisation of education systems and their cultural and linguistic diversity.
2. Community action shall be aimed at:
- developing the European dimension in education, particularly through the teaching and dissemination of the languages of the Member States,
- encouraging mobility of students and teachers, by encouraging inter alia, the academic recognition of diplomas and periods of study,
- promoting cooperation between educational establishments,- developing exchanges of information and experience on issues
common to the education systems of the Member States,- encouraging the development of youth exchanges and of exchanges
of socioeducational instructors,- encouraging the development of distance education.
Treaty – EducationArt. 165 (ex. 149)
1. The Community shall contribute to the development of quality education by encouraging cooperation between Member States and, if necessary, by supporting and supplementing their action, while fully respecting the responsibility of the Member States for the content of teaching and the organisation of education systems and their cultural and linguistic diversity.
2. Community action shall be aimed at:
- developing the European dimension in education, particularly through the teaching and dissemination of the languages of the Member States,
- encouraging mobility of students and teachers, by encouraging inter alia, the academic recognition of diplomas and periods of study,
- promoting cooperation between educational establishments,- developing exchanges of information and experience on issues
common to the education systems of the Member States,- encouraging the development of youth exchanges and of exchanges
of socioeducational instructors,- encouraging the development of distance education.
Quality of learning systems
Learning systems with roots in national/local realities
National / local quality strategies and policies
Role of Europe : support cooperation between member states
The educational system should “supply the right skills which
effectively meet the changing needs and requirements”
(UKCES, 2010)
•Need of increasing skills levels in high, intermediate and generic skills
•Management and leadership skills :Corporate managers•Professional skills : Computer/software sector, health and
social care, pharmaceutical/medical, traditional and advanced manufacturing skills, teaching, research)
•Technicians and equivalent skills : Health and social care, utilities, chemicals, life science and pharmaceuticals, automative engineering, broadcasting
•Intermediate vocational skills: Manufacturing, engineering, processing, construction … (the “skilled trades”)
•Customer service : Retailing, after-service, maintenance
•BUT also lower skills are needed: “significant employment will remain in sectors requiring low skills (but with need of up-skilling over time)
…for the labour market BUT also… for society as a whole.
Competitiveness, productivity, innovation, creativity, active citizenship, well being,
leisure, happiness, health…
Occupations decreasing more than 50% since 2000 in the UK (number of jobs)
(UKCES, 2010)
Assemblers ( electical, metal and vehical) -65%Typists -59%Bookbinders, print finishers -58%Metal making operatives -57%Telephonists -55%Precision instrument makers and repairers -54%Sewing machinists -52%Tool makers and tool fitters -52%
Occupations increasing more than 90% since 2000 in the UK (number of jobs)
(UKCES, 2010)
Environmental protection officers +124%Paramedics +114%Legal professionals +109%Refuse and salvage occupations +104%Leisure and theme park attendants +102%Town planners +94%Educational assistants + 91%Driving instructors + 91%
Educational attainment in the EU (2000-2008)
Change in share of population15-64 years old (2000 - 2008)
Low educ. att. - 5.7 %
Medium educ. att. + 1.5 %
High educ. att. + 4.2 %
Formal education (diplomas)
Educational attainment and employment (EU)
Employment rates15-64 years old (2008)
Low educ. att. 48.1 %
Medium educ. att. 70.6 %
High educ. att. 83.9 %
Overall employment rate 65.9 %
Educational attainment and employment (EU)
Change in Employment rates15-64 years old (2000 - 2008)
Low educ. att. - 0.7 %
Medium educ. att. + 2.3 %
High educ. att. + 1.5 %
Source: CEDEFOP, 2008
Future composition of the labour force (1996-2020):
How the demand for skills has changedEconomy-wide measures of routine and non-routine task input - 1960-2002. (US)
40
45
50
55
60
65
1960 1970 1980 1990 2002
Routine manual
Nonroutine manual
Routine cognitive
Nonroutine analytic
Nonroutine interactive
(Levy and Murnane)
Mean t
ask
input
as
perc
entile
s of
the 1
960 t
ask
dis
trib
ution
Non routine cognitive/interactive
Routine manuel/cognitive
“skills” achieved through formal, non-formal and informal learning
- lifelong learning (life-wide/life-long)
Useful qualities to find a good job (15-30 years old) (Eurobarometer, 2007)
IT, computer, communication technology skills
- Italy 30%
- EU 18%
- Denmark 15%
- France 14%
Foreign Languages
- Italy 25%
- EU 18%
- Germany 10%
- Denmark 7 %
Communication and teamwork skills
- Italy 17%
- EU 27%
- Denmark 38%
- UK 31%
Good appearance
- Italy 3 %
- EU 5 %
- Sweden 22%
Diversity in Europe.Labour market differences but also cultural diversity
…Ask the question on
“satisfaction” with private life and we observe great
cultural diversity in Europe
Indicators on Employability and education/training
I. Preparation for employment1. Index on : The share of young people having participated in the
VET stream of upper secondary level compared to the share of young people not in education and training with educational attainment levels ISCED 3 or below.
II. Transition from education to work 2. Percentage of young people who graduated in t-2/t-3 and are
unemployed/employed (in t) 3. Percentage of young people (25-29, 25-34) by level of
educational attainment employed at a relevant skills level
III. Education for maintaining employability4. Participation rate in LLL of older workers (55-64) 5. Participation rate in LLL of low skilled workers (ISCED 0-2) 6. Graduates (ISCED 5-6) aged 35 years and over as % of total
graduates
Key competences for being integrated in society and in the
labour market
-
To be achieved in initial education and training, but
updated and maintained throughout life
Are the European educational systems answering such
challenges of society
Communication in the mother tongue
Communication in foreign languages
Math, science and technology competence
Digital competence
Learning to learn competences
Social and civic competences
Sense of initiative and entrepreneurship
Cultural awareness and expression
Reference framework of 8 key competenciesEU Recommendation of the EP and the Council (Dec. 2006)
Monitoring and Analysing Progress
10% Early school leavers (young people)
20 % Less low performers in reading literacy
15% More new Math, Science and Technology graduates
85 % Upper secondary graduates (young people)
12.5% Lifelong learning participation (adults)
SIXTEEN CORE INDICATORS
1. Participation in pre-school education
2. Special needs education
3. Early school leavers
4. Literacy in reading, maths and science
5. Language skills
6. ICT skills
7. Civic skills
8. Learning to learn skills
9. Upper secondary completion rates of young people
10. Professional development of teachers
11. Higher education graduates
12. Cross-national mobility of students
13. Participation of adults in lifelong learning
14. Adults’ skills
15. Educational attainment of the population
16. Investment in education and training
FIVE EUROPEAN BENCHMARKS FOR 2010
Council conclusion 2003
Council Conclusions 2006
Monitoring and Analysing Progress
10% Early school leavers (young people)
20 % Less low performers in reading literacy
15% More new Math, Science and Technology graduates
85 % Upper secondary graduates (young people)
12.5% Lifelong learning participation (adults)
SIXTEEN CORE INDICATORS
1. Participation in pre-school education
2. Special needs education
3. Early school leavers
4. Literacy in reading, maths and science
5. Language skills
6. ICT skills
7. Civic skills
8. Learning to learn skills
9. Upper secondary completion rates of young people
10. Professional development of teachers
11. Higher education graduates
12. Cross-national mobility of students
13. Participation of adults in lifelong learning
14. Adults’ skills
15. Educational attainment of the population
16. Investment in education and training
FIVE EUROPEAN BENCHMARKS FOR 2010
LEARNING TO LEARN
CREATIVITY
Creativity at individual level
Enables people to purposefully produce new, original ideas, adequate to the situation they are being applied to
essential dimensions of creativity: analogical
and divergent thinking and risk taking (the
risk to be wrong!)
It can be developed, nurtured and …… taught !
autonomy
flexibility
preference for complexity
openness to experience
sensitivity
playfulness
tolerance of ambiguity
risk taking
risk tolerance
intrinsic motivation
self-efficacy
wide interest and curiosity
Creativity at individual level
Enables people to purposefully produce new, original ideas, adequate to the situation they are being applied to
essential dimensions of creativity: analogical
and divergent thinking and risk taking (the
risk to be wrong!)
It can be developed, nurtured and …… taught !
autonomy
flexibility
preference for complexity
openness to experience
sensitivity
playfulness
tolerance of ambiguity
risk taking
risk tolerance
intrinsic motivation
self-efficacy
wide interest and curiosity
Annual Progress Report on education and training
2009 report (6th report)
I: Making LLL and mobility a reality
II: improving quality and efficiency of
education and training
III: Promoting equity, social cohesion
and active citizenship
IV: Enhancing creativity and innovation
http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/2010/progressreport_en.html
Prepared by
DG Education and Culture
in coopertion with:
CRELL/JRC
EUROSTAT
EURYDICE
CEDEFOP
5 EU benchmarks for 2010 and 5+ benchmarks for 2020
2010 202010% early school leavers 10% early school leavers20% less low performers 15% low achievers
12.5% participate in LLL 12.5% participate in LLL
85% upper secondary att.
15% more MST grad.
95% participation in early childhood education
40% higher education graduation (30-40)
+
Learning Mobility (2010)
Employability and educ. (2010)
Foreign language (2012)
Ed
uca
tio
n a
nd
tra
inin
g s
yste
ms a
re
imp
rovin
g 2
00
0-2
00
8 -
EU
(27
)
Core indicators for monitoring progress of Lisbon process in
the field of education and training
Evolution
2000 - 2008 %
Share of 30-34 year olds with tertiary attainment +39.5
Graduates in Mathematics, Science, Technology +33.6 2
High education attainment of the adult population aged 25-64 +24.9
Adult Lifelong Learning participation, 25-64 +12.3
Average number of foreign languages learned per pupil at
general lower secondary education
+15 2
Early leavers from education and training, 18-24 -15.2
Participation in early childhood education + 6.0 2
Public investment in education + 0.5 1
Population aged 20-24 having completed at least upper-
secondary education
+ 2.5
Pupils with special education needs in segregated settings 0. 0
Participation patterns in initial Vocational education and training - 6.5 2
Low-achievers in reading, 15 year olds +13.11
1= 2006; 2=2007
Public investment on education as a percentage of GDP in European countries (2006p)
Public expenditure on all levels of education as a % of
GDP Average Annual percentage change
Denmark
Iceland
Cyprus
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Belgium
Slovenia
France
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Austria
Hungary
Poland
Portugal
Latvia
EU27
Ireland
Lithuania
Estonia
Italy
Czech Rep
Germany
Spain
Bulgaria
Croatia
Slovakia
Luxembourg
Turkey
Liechtenstein
Greece
Malta
Romania
MK
0.0
-0.2
2.5
0.6
-3.9
2.1
0.5
-1.8
-0.5
1.2
3.4
-0.9
3.5
0.7
-0.9
4.6
4.5
(:)
(:)
-0.6
(:)
1.7
1.1
-3.2
1.6
-0.5
-0.6
-1.3
(:)
(:)
(:)
(:)
(:)
(:)
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
2.06
2.86
3.41
3.79
4.11
4.24
4.28
4.41
4.61
4.73
4.80
4.84
4.86
5.05
5.07
5.25
5.25
5.41
5.44
5.46
5.48
5.58
5.72
6.00
6.14
6.55
6.85
7.02
7.55
7.98
(:)
(:)
(:)
(:)
0123456789
Performance and progress of public and private investments in education (% of GDP)
(2000-2006)
Public investment on tertiary educationas a percentage of GDP
Teacher Salariesas proportion of per capita GDP
ISCED 1-3, 2006/7
0
50
100
150
200
250
PL
LT
MT
SK
EE
CZ
BG
RO
EL
NO
a
HU IS LV
NO
b IT
CY IE FR
SE
AT
a
UK
-SC
T
LU
NL
PT
TR
DK FI
BE
fr
BE
de
UK
EW
NI
BE
nl
SI
DE
a ES
Minimum Maximum
International research tells us that:
Around 14% of achievements in school education can presently be explained by school factors
School resources matter little
Teachers matter
School principals matter
The rest of achievement levels must be explained by other factors:
Family background matters
Communities matter
Low Performers in reading literacy (2000-2006)
Low performers in reading literacy
ES
BE
BG
CZ
DK
DE
IE
EL
FRIT
LV
LU
HU
NL
AT
PL
PT
ROSK
FI
SE
TR
NO
EU19
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350Performance
(benchmark = 100)
Pro
gre
ss
(ave
rag
e an
nu
al g
row
th 2
000,
200
6, %
)
Catching up Moving further ahead
Falling further behind Losing momentum
large countries
medium countries
small countries
2010
benchmark
2020
benchmark
Catching up Moving further ahead
Falling further behind
Loosing momentum
Low Performers in reading literacy (2000-2006)
Low performers in reading literacy
ES
BE
BG
CZ
DK
DE
IE
EL
FRIT
LV
LU
HU
NL
AT
PL
PT
ROSK
FI
SE
TR
NO
EU19
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350Performance
(benchmark = 100)
Pro
gre
ss
(ave
rag
e an
nu
al g
row
th 2
000,
200
6, %
)
Catching up Moving further ahead
Falling further behind Losing momentum
large countries
medium countries
small countries
2010
benchmark
2020
benchmark
Low achievers in reading, 2000-2006
Percentage of pupils with reading literacy proficiency level 1 and lower on the PISA reading literacy scale,
2006
Evolution 2000-2006 (% relative change)
Finland
Ireland
Estonia
Liechtenstein
Netherlands
Sweden
Denmark
Poland
Slovenia
United Kingdom
Belgium
Germany
Iceland
Hungary
Latvia
Austria
Croatia
France
Norway
Luxembourg
EU-27
Czech Republic
Portugal
Spain
Lithuania
Italy
Greece
Slovakia
Turkey
Bulgaria
Romania
Cyprus
Malta
MK
13.5
39.7
57.7
41.7
42.8
-29.6
41.4
-11.5
21.4
-35.3
10.0
(:)
(:)
(:)
(:)
29.5
(:)
(:)
(:)
(:)
-30.2
(:)
-31.4
(:)
2.1
28.0
(:)
(:)
-10.6
-9.3
11.4
13.1
-5.3
26.8
-40.0 -20.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0
53.5
51.1
32.2
27.8
27.7
26.4
25.7
25.7
24.9
24.8
24.1
22.9
22.4
21.7
21.5
21.5
21.2
20.6
20.5
20
19.4
19
16.5
16
15.3
15.1
14.3
12.1
4.8
13.6
16.2
(:)
(:)
(:)
0102030405060
Benchmark 2010
Early leavers from education and training (2000-2008)
Early leavers from education and training
BE
BG
CZ
DK
DE
EE
IE
EL
ES
FR
IT
CY
LV
LT
LU
HUMT
NL
AT
PL
PT
RO
SI
SK
FI
SE
UK
HR
TR
IS
NO
EU27
MK
-5
0
5
10
15
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Performance
(benchmark = 100)
Pro
gre
ss
(ave
rag
e an
nu
al g
row
th 2
000-
2008
, %)
Catching up Moving further ahead
Falling further behind Losing momentum
large countries
medium countries
small countries
2010 + 2020
benchmark
Early leavers from education and training
Percentage of 18-24 years old with less than upper
secondary education and not in education or training, 2008
Evolution 2000-2008 (% relative change)
Croatia
Poland
Slovenia
Czech Republic
Slovakia
Lithuania
Finland
Austria
Sweden
Ireland
Netherlands
Denmark
Hungary
Germany
France
Belgium
Luxembourg
Cyprus
Estonia
Bulgaria
Greece
EU-27
Latvia
Romania
United Kingdom
Norway
MK
Italy
Iceland
Spain
Portugal
Malta
Turkey
Liechtenstein
32.2
-30.5
-15.2
-28.0
-25.7
-20.0
-11.2
-16.0
-1.6
-22.9
-55.0
-2.5
-21.0
-32.4
(:)
9.7
-8.3
-18.7
-13.0
-19.4
9.8
-18.1
-6.6
-7.8
-25.9
-10.0
-53.7
52.4
-0.9
-21.4
(:)
-21.4
-28.0
-18.8
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
35.4
31.9
24.4
19.7
19.6
17.0
17.0
15.9
15.5
14.9
14.8
14.8
14.0
13.7
13.4
12.0
11.8
11.8
11.7
11.5
11.4
11.3
11.1
9.8
7.4
6.0
5.6
5.0
3.7
5.1
10.1
39.0
46.6
(:)
01020304050
Benchmark 2010 + 2020
Natives Migrants
Data source: Eurostat (LFS)
Early leavers from education and training
by migrant/natives status, 2008 (rates)
Data source: Eurostat (LFS) Natives Migrants
41
Data source: Eurostat (LFS)
Low educated young people, 2008(ratio non-natives/natives)
Chart 7 Low educated (less than upper secondary) 24-29 years old by migrant status (ratio non-natives/natives) - 2008
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0
EU27
Belgium
Bulgaria
Czech
Denmark
Germany
Estonia
Ireland
Greece
Spain
France
Italy
Cyprus
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembour
Hungary
Malta
Netherlands
Austria
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovenia
Slovakia
Finland
Sw eden
UK
Early school leaver
Source: Eurostat
Females Males
Percentage of 18-24 year-olds who have lower secondary education at most and are not in further education or
training, 2007
Participation patterns in initial VET in EU countries
Students in vocational programmes at ISCED level 3 as percentage of all ISCED 3 students
Percentage of all ISCED 3 students (2007) Evolution 2000-2007 (% relative change)
Liechtenstein
Austria
Czech Republic
Slovakia
Croatia
Belgium
Netherlands
Finland
Slovenia
Romania
Luxembourg
MK
Italy
Norway
Germany
Sweden
Bulgaria
EU-27
Malta
Denmark
Poland
France
Spain
United Kingdom
Turkey
Latvia
Iceland
Ireland
Greece
Portugal
Estonia
Lithuania
Hungary
Cyprus
351.4
4.6
-10.9
-38.5
29.6
-23.7
-31.1
-12.8
-6.5
-4.1
17.0
-9.2
0.3
143.1
-6.3
3.8
-1.0
4.2
-6.9
-6.1
8.7
-1.2
-25.1
95.6
-1.9
(:)
(:)
-10.2
20.6
(:)
-8.5
129.1
-33.3
-3.7
-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
26.4
31.3
31.6
31.7
33.5
33.8
34.4
36.7
41.4
43.4
43.8
44.3
47.7
48.5
51.5
53.4
57.1
57.4
57.5
59.8
60.6
62.3
64.9
64.9
66.7
67.6
69.6
73.2
73.2
75.3
77.3
78.9
23.6
13
0102030405060708090
Pupils with special education needs in segregated settings, 1999-2008
(Percentage of total pupils in compulsory education)
Percentage of pupils with SEN in segregated settings, 2008
a
Evolution 1999-2008
a (% relative change)
Italy
Norway
Portugal
Greece
Cyprus
Spain
Malta
Slovenia
Ireland
Bulgaria
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Iceland
UK (Scotland)
UK (England)
Austria
Sweden
UK (Wales)
Poland
France
EU
Netherlands
Hungary
Denmark
Finland
Latvia
Belgium (FR)
Czech Republic
Germany
Estonia
Belgium (FL)
Croatia
Liechtenstein
MK
Romania
Slovakia
4.3
-8.2
25.0
5.4
113.3
-27.5
38.9
-26.9
-20.0
15.4
-6.3
27.3
20.0
-55.6
-57.9
50.0
50.0
66.7
-40.0
-98.0
(:)
(:)
(:)
4.1
10.0
0.0
33.3
(:)
33.3
9.1
-42.9
41.2
(:)
(:)
(:)
(:)
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150
5.1
4.8
4.8
4.5
4.4
4
3.9
3.2
2.9
2.5
2.1
1.9
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.01
(:)
(:)
(:)
(:)
(:)
0123456
Share with tertiary attainment, 30-34 year olds
Share of 30-34 year olds with tertiary attainment, 2008 (%)
Evolution 2000-2008 (% relative change)
Cyprus
Denmark
Norway
Ireland
Finland
Belgium
Sweden
France
Netherlands
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Spain
United Kingdom
Iceland
Estonia
EU-27
Slovenia
Poland
Germany
Bulgaria
Latvia
Greece
Hungary
Austria
Portugal
Malta
Italy
Croatia
Romania
Slovakia
Czech Republic
MK
Turkey
Liechtenstein
183.8
51.4
0.8
45.2
39.0
137.6
67.0
39.5
10.7
17.5
36.9
36.3
-6.3
32.1
21.9
67.6
23.9
44.2
12.4
(:)
(:)
(:)
14.2
50.7
51.7
51.4
13.4
87.7
7.8
91.2
79.8
39.6
65.5
49.1
-50 0 50 100 150 200
15.8
16.0
18.5
19.2
21.0
21.6
22.2
22.4
25.6
27.0
27.1
27.7
29.7
30.9
31.1
34.1
38.3
39.7
39.8
39.8
39.9
40.2
41.3
42.0
42.9
45.7
46.1
46.2
46.3
47.1
15.4
12.4
12.4
(:)
01020304050
Be
nch
ma
rk 2
02
0
High education attainment of the adult population (25-64 years old)
High education attainment of population aged 25-64 (%) Evolution 2000-2008 (% relative change)
Finland
Norway
Cyprus
Denmark
Ireland
Estonia
Belgium
Netherlands
United Kingdom
Sweden
Iceland
Lithuania
Spain
Luxembourg
France
Germany
Latvia
EU-27
Bulgaria
Slovenia
Greece
Poland
Hungary
Austria
Slovakia
Czech Republic
Italy
Portugal
Malta
Romania
Croatia
MK
Turkey
Liechtenstein
48.0
26.2
28.2
36.2
71.6
32.9
42.4
24.9
38.4
6.5
26.5
51.2
28.6
-28.3
7.7
19.0
18.7
31.6
37.6
12.3
38.0
145.1
43.3
25.1
31.5
56.4
13.3
12.3
34.0
62.5
(:)
(:)
(:)
(:)
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
13.2
14.3
14.4
14.5
14.8
18.1
19.2
19.6
22.6
22.6
22.8
24.3
25.2
25.4
27.3
27.7
29.2
30.4
31.3
32.0
32.0
32.2
32.3
34.3
34.4
34.5
34.5
35.5
36.6
(:)
(:)
12.8
(:)
(:)
0510152025303540
Adult Lifelong Learning participation
Lifelong learning participation
BE
BG
CZ
DK
DE EEIE
EL
ES
FR
IT
CY
LV
LT
LU
HU
MT
NL
AT
PL
PT
ROSI
SK
FI
SE
UK
HR
TR
IS
NOEU27
MK
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
0 50 100 150 200 250Performance
(benchmark = 100)
Pro
gre
ss
(ave
rag
e an
nu
al g
row
th 2
000-
2008
, %)
Catching up Moving further ahead
Falling further behind Losing momentum
large countries
medium countries
small countries
2010
benchmark
2020
benchmark
Percentage of teachers who undertook some professional development
in the previous 18 months (2007-08)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Sp
ain
Slo
ven
ia
Au
stra
lia
Au
stri
a
Lit
hu
ania
Mal
ta
Est
onia
Kor
ea
Mal
aysi
a
Mex
ico
Pol
and
Bel
giu
m (
Fl.)
Irel
and
EU
(T
AL
IS)
Ave
rage
TA
LIS
Ave
rage
Bu
lgar
ia
Hu
nga
ry
Nor
way
Por
tuga
l
Ital
y
Bra
zil
Icel
and
Den
mar
k
Slo
vak
Rep
ub
lic
Tu
rkey
Countries are ranked in descending order of percentage of teachers having had some professional development in the 18 months
prior to the survey
%
EU Non-EU Averages
TALIS I results : particiption in Professional Development
Proportion participating: in DK, SK and TU, 25% had no PD of any kind.
intensity: Average 15.3 days (EU 14.6). IE, SK, MT< 8 days. BG, IT PL, ES > 27
equity: Under-representation: males, young and old teachers, lower qualified. Variation greatest in IT,
PO, ES
Europe 2020 StrategyThree priorities for sustainable
growth and jobs
• Growth based on knowledge and innovation– Innovation– Education– Digital society
• An inclusive high-employment society– Employment– Skills– Fighting poverty
• Green growth: a competitive and sustainable economy– Combating climate change– Clean and efficient energy– Competitiveness
Smart growth - Sustainable growth - Inclusive growth
Five 'headline targets'
Raising the employment rate of the population aged 20-64 "from the current 69% to at least 75% in 2020”.
Increasing R&D investment "from the current 1.9% of EU GDP to 3%" with an alternative target combining R&D and "innovation performance".
Reducing CO2 emissions by 20% by 2020 and increasing the share of renewable energies to 20% by the same date while lowering energy consumption by 20%.
Increasing the share of the population aged 30-34 to have completed tertiary education from the current 31% to "at least 40% in 2020, and less than 10% early school leavers.
Reducing by 25% the rate of poverty (20 million less people at risk of poverty).
Defining progress
(indicators)
Strategic objectives
Areas of actions
EU Objectives and benchmarks
Benchmarks
“Making lifelong learning a reality”
“Improve mastery of basic skills”
Develop cooperation on
new skills for new jobs
Decreasing the proportion of young people not ineducation and training
Defining progress
(indicators)
Strategic objectives
Areas of actions
EU Objectives and benchmarks
Benchmarks
1995, 2003….
2004, 2009
Bologne process Copenhagen process
2002, 2006….
2003, 2009….
Common EU wide
National targets
National benchmarks and targets
Benchmarking performance and progress
EU benchmarks
�Benchmarks and
Benchmarking
High education attainment of population aged 25-64 (%) Evolution 2000-2008 (% relative change)
Finland
Norway
Cyprus
Denmark
Ireland
Estonia
Belgium
Netherlands
United Kingdom
Sweden
Iceland
Lithuania
Spain
Luxembourg
France
Germany
Latvia
EU-27
Bulgaria
Slovenia
Greece
Poland
Hungary
Austria
Slovakia
Czech Republic
Italy
Portugal
Malta
Romania
Croatia
MK
Turkey
Liechtenstein
48.0
26.2
28.2
36.2
71.6
32.9
42.4
24.9
38.4
6.5
26.5
51.2
28.6
-28.3
7.7
19.0
18.7
31.6
37.6
12.3
38.0
145.1
43.3
25.1
31.5
56.4
13.3
12.3
34.0
62.5
(:)
(:)
(:)
(:)
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
13.2
14.3
14.4
14.5
14.8
18.1
19.2
19.6
22.6
22.6
22.8
24.3
25.2
25.4
27.3
27.7
29.2
30.4
31.3
32.0
32.0
32.2
32.3
34.3
34.4
34.5
34.5
35.5
36.6
(:)
(:)
12.8
(:)
(:)
0510152025303540
Coherent framework of indicators
25
40
55
70
85
100
25 40 55 70 85 1002000
2007
5 benchmark 20105+ benchmarks 2020
(E&T 2020) Europe 2020