Education of Equitable Quality: Key Changes, Components and Action Subir Shukla Educational Quality...
-
Upload
maximillian-chambers -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Education of Equitable Quality: Key Changes, Components and Action Subir Shukla Educational Quality...
Education of Equitable Education of Equitable Quality:Quality:
Key Changes, Components and ActionKey Changes, Components and Action
Subir Shukla Educational Quality Advisor - SSA
I. Key changes…I. Key changes…Outcomes
◦ Not just the 3Rs, but towards holistic education
◦ Outcomes apply at all levels
Processes◦ Two-way, interactive◦ Construction of knowledge◦ Involve all stakeholders
Relationships◦ Not instruction, but non-hierarchical
partnerships◦ Accountability; the benefactor is now
beneficiary!
OutcomesOutcomesFrom To
•Focus on scholastic aspects•Basics (3Rs), competencies•Follow / receive instruction•Minimum level, uniform
•All round development•Higher order skills•Learning how to learn•Optimal, differentialThe shift has implications for:
• Curriculum + syllabus + materials• Training at different levels + training
materials• Learning Assessment,• Performance assessment,• Programme Evaluation
What are equitable outcomes?
Key challenge: vertical integration of outcomes
Processes Processes From To
•Passive, one-way•Receiving knowledge, •Explanation, memorization•Uniform pace of learning•Favouring the advantaged, •Onus on learner (ToT not fixed)•Child’s experience and local knowledge ignored
•Active, collaborative•Constructing knowledge, •Reflection, application•Differentiated learning•Specifically address the disadvantaged•Child’s right, (ToT fixed)•Child’s knowledge valued,
Transition in processes requires:• Clearly defined pedagogical model• Harmonization of components • Training that manifests desired processes, • Academic support structures strengthen it• RTE awareness and sensitization among all
What are ‘equitable’ processes?
RelationshipsRelationshipsFrom To
• Hierarchical• Accountability ‘above’• Holding responsible• ‘Disciplined’ atmosphere• ‘Hidden’ / overt bias
• Collaborative partnership• Accountability ‘below’• Responsive • Warm and welcoming …• Non-discriminatory
How do we generate such relationships? Starts from the top; recognize those who: •Foreground interests of the marginalized in planning, development, implementation, monitoring, reporting
Implications for: •Pedagogy, classroom organization, planning•Methods used in training and follow up•School management and community involvement
What are ‘equitable’ relationships?
Aim of education Aim of education
As per International Commission of Education is:
Learning to knowLearning to doLearning to live togetherLearning to be
Life Skills – Integral PartLife Skills – Integral Part
self-awarenessempathycommunicatio
n skillsinterpersonal
skillsdecision-
making
World Health Organisation 10 life skills.
•problem solving
•creative
thinking
•critical thinking
•coping with
emotions
•coping with
stress
II. II. Quality ‘eco-systemQuality ‘eco-system’’Underpinnings
The desirable: ‘vision’ , beliefs and assumptions , approach to knowledge/ subjects
The feasible: ground realities, contexts, implications (who are our children?)
Components
Core Components: curriculum, syllabus, pedagogical model/s, materials, classroom organization, planning, Assessment, SMC and community involvement
Enabling components: teachers, monitoring systems, administration, institutional development, performance assessment, evaluation, planning, research, policy, legislation
Leading To Outcomes:
• Every CHILD develops desired learning mandated by curriculum, across all domains • Outcomes at all levels for this to happen
Curriculum and SyllabusCurriculum and SyllabusAny curriculum document has three parts:
◦ Rationale◦ Description of subjects and learning outcomes ◦ Implementation imperatives
Syllabus is a subset of curriculum
RTE Act mentions eight factors…
NCF-05 builds on Learning without Burden◦ Distinguishes between information and knowledge◦ Provides a framework for making rational choices and
state-specific curriculum
Document on Curriculum Development provided; describes stages, processes and who should be involved
Critical that State curriculum (not SCF) is prepared in consonance with NCF-05.
TextbooksTextbooksOnly a supportive material along with TLM, library,
other print material◦ Not the curriculum, and not just for ‘covering’
Should provide openings for children and support to teacher – enable construction of knowledge
Child-friendly, inclusive and equity-oriented texts, exercises, writing style, instructions, illustration and design
In-built assessment; facilitate CCE
Production values are critical; SSA provides support
Teachers’ editions more useful than Teachers’ guides
Development process; document provided
Many examples in India, but sustainability is an issue!
Assessment of learningAssessment of learning RTE mandates CCE
Simpler than it appears; main objectives◦ Was the teaching learning process successful?◦ What to do next with whole class in general?◦ Which child needs what help?
Processes◦ Embedded in regular teaching-learning process◦ Observe children during oral, material-based, written activities◦ Only in some curricular objectives are evaluation activities
needed
Recording◦ Only 3-point scale needed for observation; ◦ Recording observed performance or output (+ portfolio)
Using the data◦ Easy to use recording and analysis procedures◦ Important to use it for taking decisions◦ Sharing with stakeholders: children, parents, community, CRC-
BRC
National ‘rapid-pilot’ project (Bihar)
In-service Teacher TrainingIn-service Teacher Training Competence Performance Effectiveness
◦ Workshops alone are not enough; follow up and establishment issues
A integrated, yet focused approach needed:◦ Content and methodology are not separate! Silos don’t help◦ Based on understanding of children and their learning process◦ The same approach must underlie curriculum, textbooks, TLM, CCE, and
training◦ Outcomes – in terms of performance – need to be spelt out◦ These outcomes sequenced according to stage of teacher development
Process linked with above◦ Field-testing critical,◦ Experiential, participatory, models desired classroom◦ Materials - contextualisable◦ Trainer capacities need urgent attention◦ Follow up by CRC-BRC / supervisors to strengthen transition initiated by
training
Assessment of training (during and after) The ‘cascade’ problem can be beaten! ‘Re-construction’ Shifting towards ‘differentiated’ training + teacher
effectiveness National ‘sharing workshops’ planned
Academic Support SystemAcademic Support System Enables teachers to visualize, plan and implement processes
advocated through training; involve other stakeholders
Take pro-active steps [situational analysis, visioning, planning, providing agreed upon inputs]
Take responsive steps [monitor, support and hand-hold, ensure classroom success]
School visits, monthly meetings, as Resource Centre
At present, a far cry from desired roles; in many states, issues of personnel, functioning, etc.
Need for mainstreaming academic resource structures in State systems:
◦ Selection issues need attention
◦ Linkages with DIETs/DRG, SCERT/SRG
Two National Task Forces on CRC-BRC development
Academic ManagementAcademic ManagementHarmonization of components
Management at the level of classroom
School management and equitable quality
Management at sub-district and district levels – role of supervisory and administrative officials
Institutional capacities – DIETs, SCERTs
Unity of thought at the state level
Consistency and continuity
Performance standards for capacity building, e.g. ADEPTS
Ultimately, Quality Audits, going well beyond learning achievement data
III. III. How SSA intends to get How SSA intends to get therethereEEQ Workshops conducted last year. Major
outputs:◦ Vision of the classroom and school we want
◦ Agreed upon a framework for harmonisation across components
◦ Initiated planning: identified critical outcomes over the coming three years, and ground realities
◦ States shared follow up plans to carry this forward to district and sub-district levels
Planning exercise undertaken in Feb 2010, guidelines for perspective plan shared
Six Outcomes to be focused Six Outcomes to be focused onon
1. Improved teacher availability and time on task
2. A warm and encouraging atmosphere visible in the school
3. Greater use of ‘learning through activity, discovery and exploration ’
4. More inclusive classroom participation i.e. a visible, continuous reduction in discriminatory classroom practices
5. Focus on higher order learning objectives
6. A higher degree of deliberation on quality-related issues in the SMCs.
11. . Improved teacher availability Improved teacher availability and ToTand ToT
Ensure teacher availability and motivatation
Some steps: Establish baseline on teacher presence and ToT
Initiate Recruitment, Deployment as per PTR
RTE awareness among teachers and community, supervisors, esp. about ToT
Strengthen monitoring system
Minimize non-teaching work
Improve grievance redressal
Share performance standards
2. A warm, encouraging 2. A warm, encouraging atmosphereatmosphere
Ensure child-friendly atmosphere inside/outside classroom
Some steps: Identify indicators and baseline
Train and encourage teachers to:◦ Put children at ease◦ Use active learning◦ Appreciate children and their work◦ Use classroom organisation effectively◦ Respect the views of children, and give it space◦ Non-negotiable – no corporal punishment or mental
harassment
School level actions
At other levels
33. . Greater use of ‘learning Greater use of ‘learning through activity, discovery and through activity, discovery and
exploration’exploration’Ensure visibility at least at the initial level in all
schools, with the teacher starting with oral activities if s/he finds the other kinds difficult.
Some steps: Indicators, baseline and ‘target’ Review curriculum, textbooks and materials Develop and overtly stated pedagogical model
(field-tested) Provide teachers with ‘bank’ of activities Re-consider format of teaching time Incorporate evaluation during/through activities Training and capacity building Self-assessment tools for teachers (based on
performance standards and indicators) Monitoring and supervision
4.4. More inclusive classroom More inclusive classroom participationparticipation
Visible, continuous reduction in discriminatory classroom practices
Some steps: Identify and make overt the kinds of discrimination in
school
Establish non-negotiables, disseminate and monitor them◦ RTE advocacy among stakeholders, including children◦ Especially monitor ‘at risk’ children
Establish working models of special training
Encourage peer learning, flexible use of time, material accessibility to all
Curriculum and material review towards inclusiveness
Teacher training and capacity building
5.5. Focus on higher order Focus on higher order learning objectiveslearning objectives
Going beyond 3 R’s towards holistic, deeper understanding and all-round development of the child◦ General: asking questions, logical abilities,
comparison/contrast, inferring, abstract thinking, problem solving, decision-making, imagination
◦ Subject specific: applying mathematics in daily life, understanding pattern, expressive writing
Some steps: Enhance curricular awareness among teachers and all
others
Highlight these aspects in curriculum and textbooks
Use of reflective processes in classroom, activities, projects
Ensure that TLM is available that enables these
Assessment to focus on these
6.6. Quality-related issues and Quality-related issues and SMCsSMCsAt present community seen as monitoring
agency or contributing labour / resources
Community has stake in children’s learning; can contribute with their own knowledge heritage.
Some steps:Review role of community, make it overt
Revamp SMC meetings
Find partners from among community, including PTA/MTA and ‘knowledge partners’
Orientation of teachers, HMs, sub-district and district staff
Coordination and ContinuityCoordination and ContinuitySSA cannot go it alone – Whole State
should be involved◦ Underpinnings discussion
◦ Shared Situation Analysis
◦ Perspective Plan
◦ Careful sequencing on inputs and action
◦ SSA Framework of Implementation under revision
◦ Quality register (quality ‘protocol’ possible)
National Resource PoolNational Resource PoolThe needWho: from within systemAvailable for work within state and regionHow many: 200-300, country-wideHow identified
◦ Stage 1: State identifies on basis of guidelines◦ Stage 2: Rigorous selection test◦ Retention on basis of continued performance
MoU◦ Commitment of participant◦ Commitment of state◦ Commitment of national component
How developed?◦ Phase 1: 8-10 months, ‘foundation’, start contributing ◦ Phase 2: 18-14 months, function-specific, mentored
EEQ-2 WorkshopsEEQ-2 WorkshopsBuilding on work done till now
Objective: Evolve clear, doable Action Plan to attain 6 outcomes; will include◦ Deeper conceptual understanding of EEQ◦ Manifestation in implementation terms (focal area)◦ Complete a Rapid Situational Analysis of state◦ Planning and coordination◦ Agreeing on follow up actions at all levels
Who: 6-7 member State Core Team (from key implementation agencies) + regional follow-up RPs
SPD and Education Secretary on last day or two
Meeting of state QCs in Gandhinagar in end-August as preparatory; Preparation note will be sent soon
Dates, VenuesDates, VenuesOct – Wk 2 Nov – Wk 1 Nov – Wk 3 Dec – Wk 1
PondicherryHimachalKarnatakaKeralaLakshadweepMeghalayaTamil NaduA & N IslandsGoa
Goa
AssamGujaratMizoramPunjabHaryanaChandigarhSikkimD & DUttarakhand
Chandigarh
DelhiMaharashtraDNHAPRajasthanWest BengalTripuraNagaland
Jaipur
ArunachalBiharJ & KMPOrissaUPChhattisgarhManipurJharkhand
RanchiYour participation is highly solicited!
As are your comments!Thank you