Education at a Glance 2011 - Key Results
146
1 1 13 September 2011 2011 edition of Education at a Glance Education at a Glance 2011 Key results Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 13 September 2011 Embarg o until 13 Septem ber 11:00
-
Upload
oecd-education -
Category
Education
-
view
295.031 -
download
2
description
A PowerPoint presentation by Andreas Schleicher, Head of the Indicators and Analysis Division, Directorate for Education, OECD.
Transcript of Education at a Glance 2011 - Key Results
11 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Education at a Glance 2011Key results
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
13 September 2011
Embargo
until13
September11:00 Paris
22 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
EditorialProgress in attainment over half a
century
33 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Progress in attainment of upper secondary education over half a century
Born 1933-42 (attainment in 1997, aged 55-64)
Born 1975-84 (attainment in 2009, aged 25-34)
n.
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
BelgiumGermany
%
Editorial
44 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Progress in attainment of tertiary education over half a century
Born 1933-42 (attainment in 1997, aged 55-64)
Born 1975-84 (attainment in 2009, aged 25-34)
n.
10
20
30
40
50
60
CanadaGermanyGreece
Editorial
%
55 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Education in times of economic uncertainty In the current economic environment…
…Continued strong demand for education – Poor labour markets and low opportunity costs for education
… Substantial public and private gains from education– Earnings premium for tertiary education remains large and
continues to grow- Public long-term gains from higher education are almost
three times the size of the investments
…High-level skills key to competitiveness… Comparative cost advantage across OECD countries
varies with educational levels
…Labour-market entry becomes more difficult– Particularly for young lower educated individuals
…Education a good insurance against unemployment and to stay employed especially in weak labour markets
Educational attainment likely to rise further Continuing education increasingly important.
66 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Unabated educational expansion
77 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Unabated educational expansion
University graduation nearly doubled from an OECD average of 20% in 1995 to 38% in 2009
Pace of change varied widely– The Slovak Republic improved its relative standing
from Rank 15 to Rank 1– USA dropped from Rank 2 to Rank 14 (UK dropped
from 2 in 2000 to 5)
Upper secondary is the norm among younger people
Significant expansion of early childhood education
Enrolment of 3-4-year-olds up from an average of 40% in 1998 to 70% in 2009
albiser_e
to update
88 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Pre-primary education
99 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Participation in early childhood education
(2009)Fra
nce
Sp
ain
De
nm
ark
No
rwa
y
Sw
ed
en
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Hu
ng
ary
Slo
ve
nia
EU
21
ave
rag
e
Au
stri
a
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Arg
en
tin
a
Fin
lan
d
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Ko
rea
Gre
ece
Ire
lan
d
Tu
rke
y
0
20
40
60
80
100
120Chart Title%
TC1.1a
albiser_e
EAG 2011: table C1.1a (col. 5 and 6, one bar per column)ok
1010 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Primary and secondary education
1111 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Growth in baseline qualifications (2009)Approximated by percentage of persons with upper secondary or equivalent
qualifications in the age groups 55-64, 45-55, 35-44 and 25-34 years
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Esto
nia
Ge
rma
ny
Ca
na
da
Po
lan
d
Isra
el
Hu
ng
ary
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
er.
..
De
nm
ark
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Ice
lan
d
Be
lgiu
m
Ch
ile
Gre
ece
Sp
ain
Me
xic
o
Po
rtu
ga
l
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2000's 1990's 1980's 1970's%
TA1.2a
albiser_e
EAG 2011: table A1.2aOK
1212 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Successful completion of upper secondary programmes (2009)
Irela
nd
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Isra
el
Pola
nd
Slo
vak
Rep
ub
lic
Sw
ed
en
Esto
nia
Slo
ven
ia
Can
ad
a
Belg
ium
(Fl.
)
Fin
lan
d
co
un
trie
s' avera
ge
Hu
ng
ary
Den
mark
Sp
ain
New
Zeala
nd
Norw
ay
Mexic
o
Icela
nd
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rg
Fra
nce1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Completion after N years Completion after N + 2 years%
Chart A2.3
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A2.3OK
1313 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Successful completion of upper secondary programmes, by gender
(2009)Is
rael
Irela
nd
Un
ited
Sta
tes
Pola
nd
Slo
vak R
ep
ub
lic
Slo
ven
ia
Esto
nia
Sw
ed
en
Belg
ium
(Fl.
Com
.)
Can
ad
a
cou
ntr
ies' avera
ge
Hu
ng
ary
Fin
lan
d
Norw
ay
Den
mark
New
Zeala
nd
Sp
ain
Mexic
o
Icela
nd
Lu
xem
bou
rg
Fra
nce
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Girls' completion after N years Girls' completion after N+2 years
Boys' completion after N years Boys' completion after N after N+2 years%
Chart A2.5
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A2.5problème de mise en page, les données sont bonnesTo check if other type of bar chart will ease the reading of the chart
1414 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Po
rtu
ga
lS
love
nia
Fin
lan
dJa
pa
nU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
No
rwa
yIr
ela
nd
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
dS
wit
zerl
an
dIs
rae
lK
ore
aIc
ela
nd
Hu
ng
ary
De
nm
ark
Po
lan
dG
erm
an
yC
zech
Re
pu
blic
OE
CD
ave
rag
eS
lova
k R
ep
ub
licIt
aly
Ca
na
da
Un
ite
d S
tate
sG
20
ave
rag
eS
pa
inS
we
de
nLu
xe
mb
ou
rgC
hile
Ch
ina
Me
xic
oT
urk
ey
0
20
40
60
80
100
of which < 25 of which ≧ 25 Total
Chart A2.1
%
Upper secondary graduation rate (2009) Percentage, by age group
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A2.1updated
1515 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Share of upper secondary graduates in 2009(all OECD and G20 countries)
China, 42.6%
United States, 9.9%
Brazil, 7.3%
Indonesia, 6.1%
Russian Federation, 5.2%Japan, 3.4%
Mexico, 2.8%
France, 2.8%
Germany, 2.5%
United Kingdom,
2.2%
Korea, 1.7%
Turkey, 1.6%
Italy, 1.5%
Poland, 1.4%
Canada, 1.1%
Spain, 1.0%
Australia, 1.0%
Argentina, 0.9%
Nether-lands, 0.7%
Chile, 0.6%
Other countries,
3.8%
OtherBelgium 0.4%Portugal 0.4%Czech Republic 0.3%Hungary 0.3%Israel 0.3%Sweden 0.3%Austria 0.3%Switzerland 0.2%Slovak Republic 0.2%Finland 0.2%Norway 0.2%New Zealand 0.2%Denmark 0.2%Ireland 0.2%Slovenia 0.1%Estonia 0.0%Iceland 0.0%Luxembourg 0.0%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart A1.4OK
1616 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Difference in reading performance between students from different
socio-economic backgrounds%
TA5.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Score point diff erence associated with one unit increase in the PI SA index of economic, social and cultural status
OECD Average
Dubreucq_A
EAG 2011: chart A5.1updated
1717 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Reading performance, by immigrant status
Fin
lan
dC
an
ad
aN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Au
stra
liaN
eth
erl
an
ds
Be
lgiu
mN
orw
ay
Est
on
iaS
wit
zerl
an
dU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Sw
ed
en
Ge
rma
ny
Ire
lan
dFra
nce
De
nm
ark
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mH
un
ga
ryO
EC
D a
ve
rag
ePo
rtu
ga
lIt
aly
Slo
ve
nia
Gre
ece
Sp
ain
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licIs
rae
lLu
xe
mb
ou
rgA
ust
ria
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
...
Me
xic
oB
razi
l300
350
400
450
500
550
Students without an immigrant background
Second-generation students
First-generation students
Chart A5.3
Score points
Countries are ranked in descending order of the mean score of all stu-dents.
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A5.3OK
1818 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Finla
nd
Aust
ralia
Irela
nd
Sw
itze
rland
New
Zeala
nd
Norw
ay
Icela
nd
Sw
eden
Chin
ese
Taip
ei
United K
ingdom
D
enm
ark
Germ
any
France
Est
onia
Cze
ch R
epublic
H
ungary
Canada
Aust
ria
Pola
nd
OEC
D a
vera
ge
Spain
Kore
aU
nited S
tate
sSlo
venia
Luxe
mbourg
Gre
ece
Neth
erl
ands
Belg
ium
Italy
Japan
Russ
ian F
edera
tion
Slo
vak
Republic
Port
ugal
Shanghai-C
hin
aC
hile
Isra
el
Turk
ey
Bra
zil
Mexi
coA
rgentina
Indonesi
a
350
400
450
500
550
600
Bottom quarter Second quarter Third quarter Top quarter
Chart A6.1
Score points
Countries are ranked in descending order of the percentage of explained variance in student performance
Relationship between enjoying reading and performance in reading
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A6.1OK
1919 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Tertiary education
2020 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
AustraliaAustriaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaLuxembourgMexicoNetherlandNew ZealandNorwayPolandPortugalSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTurkeyUnited KingdomUnited States
A world of change – higher education
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.0
5,000.0
10,000.0
15,000.0
20,000.0
25,000.0
30,000.0
1995
Expe
ndit
ure
per
stud
ent
at t
ertia
ry le
vel (
USD
)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Graduate supply
Cost
per
stu
den
tUnited States
Finland
Japan
2222 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
AustraliaAustriaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaLuxembourgMexicoNetherlandNew ZealandNorwayPolandPortugalSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTurkeyUnited KingdomUnited States
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.0
5,000.0
10,000.0
15,000.0
20,000.0
25,000.0
30,000.0
2000
Expe
ndit
ure
per
stud
ent
at t
ertia
ry le
vel (
USD
)
A world of change – higher education
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.0
5,000.0
10,000.0
15,000.0
20,000.0
25,000.0
30,000.0
2000
Expe
ndit
ure
per
stud
ent
at t
ertia
ry le
vel (
USD
)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
United States
JapanFinland
2323 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
AustraliaAustriaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaLuxembourgMexicoNetherlandNew ZealandNorwayPolandPortugalSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTurkeyUnited KingdomUnited States
A world of change – higher education
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.0
5,000.0
10,000.0
15,000.0
20,000.0
25,000.0
30,000.0
2001
Expe
ndit
ure
per
stud
ent
at t
ertia
ry le
vel (
USD
)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
2424 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
AustraliaAustriaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaLuxembourgMexicoNetherlandNew ZealandNorwayPolandPortugalSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTurkeyUnited KingdomUnited States
A world of change – higher education
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.0
5,000.0
10,000.0
15,000.0
20,000.0
25,000.0
30,000.0
2002
Expe
ndit
ure
per
stud
ent
at t
ertia
ry le
vel (
USD
)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
2525 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
AustraliaAustriaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaLuxembourgMexicoNetherlandNew ZealandNorwayPolandPortugalSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTurkeyUnited KingdomUnited States
A world of change – higher education
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.0
5,000.0
10,000.0
15,000.0
20,000.0
25,000.0
30,000.0
2003
Expe
ndit
ure
per
stud
ent
at t
ertia
ry le
vel (
USD
)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
2626 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
AustraliaAustriaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaLuxembourgMexicoNetherlandNew ZealandNorwayPolandPortugalSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTurkeyUnited KingdomUnited States
A world of change – higher education
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.0
5,000.0
10,000.0
15,000.0
20,000.0
25,000.0
30,000.0
2004
Expe
ndit
ure
per
stud
ent
at t
ertia
ry le
vel (
USD
)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
2727 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
AustraliaAustriaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaLuxembourgMexicoNetherlandNew ZealandNorwayPolandPortugalSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTurkeyUnited KingdomUnited States
A world of change – higher education
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.0
5,000.0
10,000.0
15,000.0
20,000.0
25,000.0
30,000.0
2005
Expe
ndit
ure
per
stud
ent
at t
ertia
ry le
vel (
USD
)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
2828 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
AustraliaAustriaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaLuxembourgMexicoNetherlandNew ZealandNorwayPolandPortugalSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTurkeyUnited KingdomUnited States
A world of change – higher education
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.0
5,000.0
10,000.0
15,000.0
20,000.0
25,000.0
30,000.0
2006
Expe
ndit
ure
per
stud
ent
at t
ertia
ry le
vel (
USD
)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
2929 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
AustraliaAustriaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaLuxembourgMexicoNetherlandNew ZealandNorwayPolandPortugalSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTurkeyUnited KingdomUnited States
A world of change – higher education
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.0
5,000.0
10,000.0
15,000.0
20,000.0
25,000.0
30,000.0
2007
Expe
ndit
ure
per
stud
ent
at t
ertia
ry le
vel (
USD
)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
3030 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
AustraliaAustriaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaLuxembourgMexicoNetherlandNew ZealandNorwayPolandPortugalSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTurkeyUnited KingdomUnited States
A world of change – higher education
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.0
5,000.0
10,000.0
15,000.0
20,000.0
25,000.0
30,000.0
2008 Ex
pend
itur
e pe
r st
uden
t at
ter
tiary
leve
l (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
3131 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Growth in university-level qualifications (2009)Approximated by the percentage of the population that has attained tertiary-
type A education in the age groups 25-34 years and 55-64 years
Ko
rea
Jap
an
Ire
lan
d
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
De
nm
ark
Isra
el
Sw
ed
en
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Fin
lan
d
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
G2
0 a
ve
rag
e
Po
lan
d
Slo
ve
nia
Ge
rma
ny
Po
rtu
ga
l
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Me
xic
o
Tu
rke
y
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
25-34 year-olds 55-64 year-olds %
Chart A1.1
albiser_e
Chart A1.1 EAG 2011OK
3232 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Countries’ share in the total 25-64 year-old population with tertiary education,
percentage (2009)
United States, 25.8%
China, 12.1%
Japan, 11.4%
United Kingdom,
4.7%Germany, 4.6%Korea, 4.3%
Brazil, 4.1%
France, 3.6%Canada, 3.6%
Spain, 3.1%
Mexico, 3.0%
Indonesia, 2.1%
Italy, 1.9%
Poland, 1.7%
Australia, 1.6%
Turkey, 1.6%
Netherlands, 1.1%
Argentina, 1.1%
Others, 8.6%
Chart A1.4
OtherBelgium 0.76 Chile 0.71 Saudi Arabia 0.62 Sweden 0.62 Switzerland 0.59 Israel 0.59 Greece 0.56 Hungary 0.43 Finland 0.42 South Africa 0.40 Denmark 0.38 Czech Republic 0.37 Norway 0.36 Austria 0.34 Portugal 0.34 New Zealand 0.33 Ireland 0.33 Slovak Republic 0.19 Slovenia 0.11 Estonia 0.10 Luxembourg 0.04 Iceland 0.02
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart A1.4OK
3333 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Countries’ share in the population with tertiary education,
for 25-34 and 55-64 year-old age groups, percentage (2009)
United States, 35.8
Japan, 12.4
China, 6.9Germany, 6.3
United Kingdom, 5.3
Canada, 4.2
France, 3.5
Brazil, 3.5
Spain, 2.1Italy, 1.9
Mexico, 1.8
Australia, 1.7
Korea, 1.6other, 12.9
55-64-year-old population
United States, 20.5
Japan, 10.9
China, 18.3
Germany, 3.1United Kingdom, 4.4
Canada, 3.1France, 4.1
Brazil, 4.5
Spain, 3.5
Italy, 2.0
Mexico, 3.9
Australia, 1.6
Korea, 5.7
other, 14.5
25-34-year-old populationAbout 39 million people
who attained tertiary levelAbout 81 million people
who attained tertiary level
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A4.2OK
3434 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Share of new entrants into tertiary education in 2009 (all OECD and G20 countries)
China, 36.6%
United States, 12.9%
Russian Federa-tion, 10.0%
Indonesia, 4.9%Japan, 4.2%Turkey, 3.7%
United Kingdom, 3.3%
Mexico, 3.1%Korea, 3.1%
Argentina, 2.7%Germany, 2.5%
Poland, 2.1%
Spain, 1.6%Italy, 1.4%
Australia, 1.3%Chile, 1.3%
Netherlands, 0.5%
Other countries, 4.8%
OtherPortugal 0.5%Czech Republic 0.4%Israel 0.4%Sweden 0.4%Belgium 0.4%Hungary 0.4%Austria 0.4%New Zealand 0.3%Switzerland 0.3%Slovak Republic 0.3%Denmark 0.2%Norway 0.2%Ireland 0.2%Finland 0.2%Slovenia 0.1%Estonia 0.1%Iceland 0.0%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart A1.4OK
3535 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Students are attracted to specific fields of education
3636 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Percentage of tertiary degrees awarded to women, by field of education (2009)
Only those fields in which fewer than 30% or more than 70% of women graduated in 2009 are shown
Est
onia
Icela
nd
Slo
venia
Hungary
Pola
nd
Slo
vak
Republic
Sw
eden
Bra
zil
Finla
nd
Norw
ay
New
Zeala
nd
Denm
ark
Spain
Canada
Irela
nd
Arg
entina
Port
ugal
Cze
ch R
epublic
OEC
D a
vera
ge
United S
tate
sC
hile
Isra
el
Neth
erl
ands
Aust
ralia
United K
in...
Germ
any
Mexi
coB
elg
ium
Aust
ria
France
Sw
itze
rland
Kore
aTurk
ey
Japan
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
All fields Education Health and welfare Humanities and arts Social sciences, business and law Engineering, manufacturing and construction Science
%
Chart A4.1
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A4.1OK
3737 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Graduates in upper secondary vocational programmes, by field of education and
gender (2009)
10.619.1
29.8
19.1
8.91.73.9
6.9
Girls (%)
Humanities, arts and education Health and welfare
Social sciences, business and law Services
Engineering, manufacturing and construction Science
Agriculture Not known or unspecified
Chart A4.2
Humanities, arts and education; 5.1
Health and welfare ; 2.4 Social sciences, business and
law ; 12.4
Services ; 10.3
Engineering, manufac-turing and construction ;
54.0
Science; 3.7
Agriculture ; 4.6
Not known or unspeci-fied ; 7.5
Boys (%)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A4.2OK
3838 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Tertiary graduates in science-related fields among 25-34 year-olds in employment, by
gender (2009)
Ko
rea
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
dF
ran
ce
Fin
lan
dU
nit
ed
Kin
...
Au
str
ali
aS
lova
k R
ep
ub
lic
Ire
lan
dC
an
ad
aS
wit
ze
rla
nd
Po
lan
dO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eG
erm
an
yC
ze
ch
Re
pu
bli
cC
hil
eD
en
ma
rkA
ustr
iaJa
pa
nE
sto
nia
Sw
ed
en
Po
rtu
ga
lT
urk
ey
Sp
ain
Un
ite
d S
tate
sIc
ela
nd
Be
lgiu
mS
love
nia
Me
xic
oN
eth
erl
an
ds
No
rwa
yH
un
ga
ry
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
Total Men
Women
Chart A4.6
Number of graduatesper 100 000 em-ployed
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A4.6OK
3939 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Impact on the future stock of skills
4040 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
0 10 20 30 40 50 60-5
0
5
10
15
20
25Korea
PolandFrance
Ireland Japan
NorwayDenmark
Luxembourg
Chile
PortugalSpain Sweden
Belgium
AustraliaUKMSlovenia
Netherlands New ZealandCanada
Italy GreeceHungarySwitzerlandSlovak Republic
Czech RepublicTurkey
MexicoIceland
FinlandAustria
EstoniaUnited States
Germany Israel
Proportion of the 25-64 year-old population with tertiary education
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Chile
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
GreeceHungary
I celand
I reland
I taly
J apan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
NetherlandsNew Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Spain
Sweden
SwitzerlandTurkey
United Kingdom
United StatesBrazil Estonia
I srael
Russian Federation
Slovenia
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Diff
erence b
etw
een t
he 2
5-34 and 2
5-64 year-
old
popula
tion w
ith t
erti
ary
educati
on
Proportion of the 25- 64 year- old population with tertiary education
OECD average
OECD average
High attainment; I ncreasing advantage
High attainment; Decreasing advantage
Lower attainment; Decreasing disadvantage
Lower attainment; I ncreasing disadvantage
Current and future stock of high qualification (2008)
TA3.1a
Incre
asin
g a
dvan
tag
e
Higher attainment
OECD average
High attainment; Increasing advantage
Lower attainment; Catching up
Lower attainment;
Getting behind furtherHigh attainment;
Decreasing advantage
OECD average
albiser_e
Chart A1.3, EAG 2011OK, animation to check
4141 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Tertiary-type A graduation rates, by gender (2009)(first-time graduation)
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Ice
lan
d
Po
lan
d
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Au
str
ali
a
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
De
nm
ark
Ire
lan
d
Fin
lan
d
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
No
rwa
y
Jap
an
Po
rtu
ga
l
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Cze
ch
Re
pu
bli
c
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Isra
el
Ca
na
da
Sw
ed
en
Ita
ly
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Hu
ng
ary
Au
str
ia
Ge
rma
ny
Sp
ain
Slo
ve
nia
Tu
rke
y
Me
xic
o
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
M+W Men Women%
TA3.1
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Table A3.1 (gender only)OKnote:chart by gender and age group (chart A3.1) in slide 128
4242 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
First-time graduation rates for tertiary-type A and type B programmes (1995 and 2009)
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Ice
lan
d
Po
lan
d
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Au
stra
lia
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
De
nm
ark
Ire
lan
d
Fin
lan
d
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
No
rwa
y
Jap
an
Po
rtu
ga
l
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Isra
el
Ca
na
da
Sw
ed
en
Ita
ly
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Hu
ng
ary
Au
stri
a
Ge
rma
ny
Sp
ain
Slo
ve
nia
Tu
rke
y
Me
xic
o
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Tertiary-type A (2009) Tertiary-type B (2009)
Tertiary-type A (1995) Tertiary-type B (1995)
Chart A3.2
%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A3.2OK
4343 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Trends in graduation rates at tertiary-type A level
1995
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
n.
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
CanadaJapanOECD averageTurkey
T A3.2
%
4444 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
The crisis hit the youngest hardestThe unemployment rate for 15-29 year-olds
increased,on average, from 10.2% to 13.5%
Lack of relevant skills/experience brings higher unemployment risk for recent entrants
to the labour force
4646 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
When the crisis hit: Change between 2008-09 in unemployment rates for 25-64year-olds
EST
ESP
IRL
USA
CZ
E
DN
K
HU
N
CA
N
TU
R
SW
E
OEC
D
PR
T
PO
L
NZ
L
AU
T
GR
C
FRA
SV
N
FIN
MEX
CH
E
AU
S
BEL
BR
A
ISR
ITA
LUX
NO
R
NLD
CH
L
KO
R
DEU
JPN
UKM
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2008 2009%
Below upper secondary edu-cation
EST
ESP
IRL
USA
CH
LTU
RD
NK
LUX
ISR
UKM
HU
NC
AN
AU
SO
EC
DSW
EM
EX
GR
CFR
AC
HE
NZ
LKO
RIT
ASV
KFI
NC
ZE
BEL
JPN
AU
TPO
LN
LDB
RA
NO
RD
EU
SV
NPR
T
0
5
10
15
20
25
30%
Tertiary
Chart A7.2Countries are ranked in descending order of the difference between 2009 and 2008 unemployment rates
albiser_e
Chart A1.1 EAG 2011OK
4747 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Proportion of 15-29 year-olds unemployed (2009)
-1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 150
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Norway
Iceland
Denmark
Ireland
Finland
Austria
Czech Republic
Estonia
Mexico
Canada
France
Israel
Belgium
Australia
Germany Italy
Poland
Sweden
Slovenia
Greece
Switzerland
Netherlands
OECD average
New Zealand
Portugal
United Kingdom
United States
Turkey
Spain
%%%In
ed
ucati
on
Not in education
OECD average
OECD average
Table C4.2a
albiser_e
EAG 2011:chart C4.4OK
4848 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Proportion of 15-29 year-olds unemployed,by duration of unemployment (2009)
C3.1
Norway
Denmark
Finland
Czech Republic
Mexico
France
Belgium
Germany
OECD average
Slovenia
Switzerland
Poland
Portugal
United States
Spain
0 5 10 15
Unemployed less than 6 monthsUnemployed more than 6 months
%Norway
Denmark
Finland
Czech Republic
Mexico
France
Belgium
Germany
OECD average
Slovenia
Switzerland
Poland
Portugal
United States
Spain
0 5 10 15
Unemployed less than 6 monthsUnemployed more than 6 months
Chart C4.4
%
In education Not in education
albiser_e
EAG 2011:chart C4.4OK
4949 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Positive relation between education and employment
Percentage of 25-64 year-olds in employment, by level of education (2009)
No
rwa
y
Slo
ve
nia
Sw
ed
en
De
nm
ark
Au
stri
a
Bra
zil
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rg
Fin
lan
d
Au
stra
lia
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Fra
nce
Est
on
ia
Gre
ece
Ca
na
da
Sp
ain
Jap
an
Hu
ng
ary
Ko
rea
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Tertiary education
Upper secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary
Below upper secondary
Chart A7.1
%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A7.1OKEAG 2010: Chart A6.1
5151 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Comparison of vocational attainment and unemployment rates between 25-34 and 25-64 year-
olds (2009)
C3.1
Po
rtu
ga
l
Gre
ece
Ita
ly
Tu
rke
y
Be
lgiu
m
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Au
stri
a
Sp
ain
Ire
lan
d
Ko
rea
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Au
stra
lia
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Slo
ve
nia
Ca
na
da
Fin
lan
d
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Fra
nce
Hu
ng
ary
Isra
el
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rg
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
De
nm
ark
Ge
rma
ny
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Est
on
ia
Sw
ed
en
Ice
lan
d
Po
lan
d
No
rwa
y
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Proportion of 25-34 year-olds with vocational attainment minus pro-portion of 25-64 year-olds with vocational attainment
Chart A7.5
%
albiser_e
EAG 2011:chart A7.5OKNote: add a slide with chart replacing unemployment by employment rates (computed based on T_A7.6)
5252 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
The increase in the number of knowledge workers has not led to a decrease in their pay
…which is what happened to low-skilled workers
5353 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Relative earnings from employment By level of educational attainment for 25-to-64 year-olds
(upper secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education = 100) (2009 or latest available year)
Bra
zil
Hu
ng
ary
Slo
ve
nia
Cze
ch
Re
pu
bli
cS
lova
k R
ep
ub
lic
Un
ite
d S
tate
sP
ort
ug
al
Po
lan
dLu
xe
mb
ou
rgIr
ela
nd
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mN
eth
erl
an
ds
Ge
rma
ny
Au
str
iaS
wit
ze
rla
nd
Isra
el
OE
CD
ave
rag
eG
ree
ce
Ita
lyT
urk
ey
Jap
an
Fra
nce
Fin
lan
dS
pa
inC
an
ad
aE
sto
nia
Au
str
ali
aB
elg
ium
Ko
rea
No
rwa
yD
en
ma
rkS
we
de
nN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
40 60 80
100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280
Below upper secondary education Tertiary education
Chart A8.1
Index
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A8.1OK
5454 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Bra
zil
Hu
ng
ary
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licG
ree
ceU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
licPo
lan
dIs
rae
lIr
ela
nd
Po
rtu
ga
lFin
lan
dC
an
ad
aA
ust
ria
Fra
nce
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rgO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eG
erm
an
yIt
aly
Tu
rke
yU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Ne
the
rla
nd
sS
pa
inA
ust
ralia
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Be
lgiu
mS
we
de
nD
en
ma
rkJa
pa
nN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Ko
rea
No
rwa
y
40 60 80
100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280
Below upper secondary education
Tertiary-type B education
Tertiary-type A and advanced research programmesIndex
Chart A8.2
Relative earnings from employment for men By level of educational attainment for 25-to-64 year-old men
(upper secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education= 100) (2009 or latest available year)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A8.2 (Men)OK
5555 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Bra
zil
Gre
ece
Jap
an
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mIr
ela
nd
Hu
ng
ary
Un
ite
d S
tate
sS
lova
k R
ep
ub
lic
Isra
el
Ca
na
da
Po
rtu
ga
lC
ze
ch
Re
pu
bli
cS
pa
inG
erm
an
yO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eS
wit
ze
rla
nd
Au
str
iaN
eth
erl
an
ds
Tu
rke
yA
ustr
ali
aP
ola
nd
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rgF
inla
nd
Fra
nce
Ko
rea
Be
lgiu
mIt
aly
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
dN
orw
ay
Sw
ed
en
De
nm
ark
40 60 80
100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280
Below upper secondary educationTertiary-type B education Tertiary-type A and advanced research programmes
Chart A8.2
Index
Relative earnings from employment for women
By level of educational attainment for 25-to-64 year-old women(upper secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education=100)
(2009 or latest available year)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A8.2 (women)OK
5656 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
DenmarkSwedenTurkey
New ZealandNorway
SpainAustralia
NetherlandsBelgiumFinland
JapanFrance
GermanyAustria
OECD AverageCanada
United KingdomPoland
SloveniaHungary
Czech RepublicIreland
KoreaItaly
United StatesPortugal
-400,000 -200,000 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000
55,946 62,481
64,177 74,457
92,320 95,320
100,520 112,928
115,464 135,515 143,018
144,133 147,769
173,522 175,067
175,670 207,653
215,125 225,663 230,098
240,449 253,947
300,868 311,966
323,808 373,851
Foregone earnings Income tax effect Social contribution effectTransfers effect Grosss earnings benefits Unemployment effectNet Present value
USD equivalentC hart A9.3
Components of the private net present value for a man with higher education (2007 or latest available
year)
Net present value in USD equ.
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A9.3OKEAG 2010: Data updated but for female instead of male (as in EAG 2010)
5757 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
SwedenNew Zealand
DenmarkItaly
NetherlandsFinlandTurkey
NorwayGermanyHungary
FranceBelgium
JapanCanada
OECD averageAustralia
SpainAustriaPoland
Czech RepublicUnited Kingdom
United StatesSlovenia
KoreaIreland
Portugal
-400,000 -200,000 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000
35,25643,56051,555
55,30162,777
76,39480,466
82,23584,732
86,19594,206
102,183104,812107,088110,007
111,078112,016
112,121129,717134,529
155,432157,793
167,020190,077
202,664210,968
Foregone earnings Income taxSocial contributions TransfersGross earnings benefits Unemployment effect
USD equivalentT A9.3
Components of the private net present value for a woman with higher education (2007 or latest
available year)
Net present value in
USD equivalent
albiser_e
EAG 2011: table A9.3OKEAG 2010: Data updated but for female instead of male (as in EAG 2010)
5858 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
TurkeyCzech Rep.
KoreaPoland
PortugalHungary
SpainNew Zealand
BelgiumAustralia
OECD averageItaly
FinlandNorwaySwedenCanada
DenmarkGermany
AustriaUnited Kingdom
Netherlands
-100,000 -50,000 0 50,000 100,000
23,899 38,466
43,039 44,268
46,603 52,065 56,077
59,711 61,658
71,057 79,821
85,603 94,315
98,176 99,960
100,378 103,660
112,018 119,458
124,906 161,110
Private foregone earnings Public direct costPublic foregone earnings Total investment private + public in USD equivalent
USD equivalent
Public costsPrivate costs
Chart A9.4
Public and private investment for a man obtaining higher education (2007 or latest
available year)
Total investment private+pu
blic
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A9.4
5959 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
DenmarkSweden
NetherlandsJapan
NorwaySpain
New ZealandAustriaFrance
United KingdomFinland
AustraliaOECD average
GermanyCanadaTurkey
United StatesIreland
BelgiumItaly
Czech RepublicKorea
PolandSloveniaHungaryPortugal
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
Private cost Public cost Private benefits Public benefit
%
TA9.3 and TA9.4
Benefits Costs
Distribution of public/private costs/benefitsfor a man obtaining higher education
(2007 or latest available year)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: same as for chart A9.1, but for Men (see tables A9.3 and A9.4)OK
6060 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
DenmarkSweden
NetherlandsNew Zealand
NorwayJapan
FinlandItaly
FranceAustria
GermanyUnited States
CanadaOECD average
United KingdomSpain
AustraliaBelgium
KoreaCzech Republic
IrelandHungary
TurkeyPoland
SloveniaPortugal
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
Private cost Public cost Private benefits Public benefit
%Chart A9.1
Benefits Costs
Distribution of public/private costs/benefitsfor a woman obtaining higher education
(2007 or latest available year)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A9.1OK
6161 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
OECD countries TertiaryBelow upper secondary
Australia 1.6 1.6 0.8 0.8
Austria* 2.8 2.8 -6.0 -6.0
Belgium* 3.7 3.7 -0.6 -0.6
Canada* 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2
Czech Republic 9.1 9.1 2.9 2.9
Denmark 3.2 3.2 -4.9 -4.9
Finland* -6.2 -6.2 -2.5 -2.5
France -3.6 -3.6 1.4 1.4
Germany 21.6 21.6 7.3 7.3
Hungary 11.1 11.1 1.4 1.4
Ireland* 10.9 10.9 -5.4 -5.4
Israel* 2.7 2.7 1.1 1.1
Italy* 11.7 11.7 1.0 1.0
Korea* -9.7 -9.7 2.2 2.2
Luxembourg* 16.8 16.8 -12.6 -12.6
Netherlands* 10.8 10.8 -2.4 -2.4
New Zealand -2.1 -2.1 -2.2 -2.2
Norway* -5.5 -5.5 -5.6 -5.6
Poland* 6.1 6.1 0.7 0.7
Portugal -8.7 -8.7 5.8 5.8
Slovenia* -7.4 -7.4 -0.3 -0.3
Spain* 12.5 12.5 0.9 0.9
Sweden -5.2 -5.2 -6.0 -6.0
Switzerland 1.2 1.2 -1.0 -1.0
United Kingdom -3.2 -3.2 1.0 1.0
United States 13.0 13.0 -0.5 -0.5
* Limited years; Other notes: Yellow within +/- 3%; Red > -3%; Green > +3%TA8.2a
Percentage-point change in relative earnings 25-64 year-olds (1998-2008 or latest available years)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Table A8.2a (1999-2009)OK
6262 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Taxpayers are getting a good return too
6363 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Private and public returns for a man obtaining an upper secondary education (ISCED 3/4) and a tertiary education
(ISCED 5/6); 3% real interest rate
De
nm
ark
Tu
rke
y
Sw
ed
en
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Sp
ain
No
rwa
y
Au
stra
lia
Fra
nce
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Jap
an
Fin
lan
d
Ca
na
da
Au
stri
a
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Be
lgiu
m
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Pola
nd
Ge
rma
ny
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Ire
lan
d
Slo
ven
ia
Ko
rea
Ita
ly
Hu
ng
ary
Port
ug
al
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
Private return (tertiary education) Public return (tertiary education)
Private return (upper secondary education) Public return (upper secondary education)
TA9.1, A9.2, A9.3 and A9.4
USD equivalent
albiser_e
EAG 2011: tables A9.1, A9.2, A9.3, A9.4OKnote: value for total public and private return not added to the chart as this is difficult to read, but available in data for the chart
6464 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
TurkeyDenmark
SpainSweden
New ZealandNorwayFranceJapan
CanadaCzech Republic
ItalyAustralia
IrelandKorea
PortugalAustria
OECD AveragePoland
NetherlandsUnited Kingdom
FinlandSloveniaHungaryBelgium
GermanyUnited States
0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000
21,724
28,621
29,58237,542
46,482
43,41963,701
67,411
79,77481,307
82,93284,532
85,91789,034
89,46489,705
91,036
94,12595,030
95,322
100,177155,664
166,872167,241
168,649
193,584
Public benefits Public costs
Chart A9.5 In equivalent USD
Public cost and benefits for a man obtaining tertiary education (2007 or latest available year)
Net present value
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A9.5 (tertiary)OK
6565 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Public cost and benefits for a man obtaining upper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary education (2007 or latest available
year)
FrancePolandSpain
TurkeyFinland
Czech RepublicSloveniaAustralia
CanadaSwedenHungary
New ZealandOECD Average
ItalyIrelandNorway
PortugalGermanyDenmark
United StatesUnited Kingdom
Austria
-5,000 45,000 95,000 145,000
-2,501
6,0107,738
11,37118,362
43,41922,981
27,51828,20431,05632,93833,55336,302
42,16243,624
46,71152,629
56,68059,089
70,49772,161
79,637
Public benefits Public costs
Chart A9.5 In equivalent USD
Net present value
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A9.5 (upper secondary post-secondary non-tertiary)OK
6666 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Proportion of adults satisfied with life, by level of education (2008)
De
nm
ark
Fin
lan
dN
eth
erl
an
ds
Sw
ed
en
No
rwa
yS
wit
zerl
an
dN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rgC
an
ad
aB
elg
ium
Au
stri
aS
pa
inIs
rae
lO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Ire
lan
dPo
lan
dG
erm
an
yS
love
nia
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licG
ree
ceS
lova
k R
ep
ub
licPo
rtu
ga
lT
urk
ey
Fra
nce
Ko
rea
Est
on
iaR
uss
ian
Fe
de
ra..
.H
un
ga
ry
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Below upper secondary educationUpper secondary educationTertiary education
Chart A11.1
%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A11.1OK
6767 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Proportion of adults voting and volunteering, by level of education
(2008)B
EL
DN
KS
WE
NLD
GR
ET
UR
IRL
ES
PN
ZL
NO
RH
UN
DE
US
VK
PR
TO
EC
D..
.FR
AA
UT
FIN
ISR
PO
LC
AN
SV
NR
US
US
AU
KM
KO
RE
ST
CH
EC
ZE
40
60
80
100
Below upper secondary education Upper secondary education Tertiary education
%
Electoral participation
NLD
NZ
L
NO
R
DN
K
AU
T
SW
E
DE
U
FR
A
SV
N
IRL
BE
L
CH
E
OE
CD
UK
M
FIN
CZ
E
SV
K
ES
T
HU
N
PO
L
ISR
ES
P
TU
R
GR
E
RU
S
PR
T
0
20
40
%
Volunteering
Chart A11.2
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A11.1OK
6868 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Civic engagement by student's level of civic knowledge (2009)
ESP
SW
E
IRL
NLD
LUX
EN
G
NO
R
BFL
DN
K
AU
T
CH
L
CH
E
GR
C
NZ
L
SV
N
OEC
D ...
ITA
FIN
KO
R
EST
MEX
CZ
E
SV
K
PO
L
IDN
RU
S
35
40
45
50
55
60
Supportive attitudes towards gender equal-ity
IDN
AU
T
RU
S
ITA
NO
R
SW
E
CH
L
FIN
LUX
EN
G
NLD
NZ
L
IRL
OEC
D ...
MEX
DN
K
CH
E
ESP
BFL
SV
K
CZ
E
EST
SV
N
GR
C
PO
L
KO
R
35
40
45
50
55
60
Trust in civic institutions
Mean scale of civic engagement among grade 8 students
IDN
MEX
ITA
RU
S
CH
L
AU
T
ESP
GR
C
IRL
NO
R
SV
N
OEC
D...
PO
L
LUX
NZ
L
SW
E
SV
K
NLD FIN
KO
R
EN
G
CH
E
DN
K
EST
BFL
CZ
E
35
40
45
50
55
60Below Level 1 Level 1 Level 3 Level 2Mean ICCS scale
Expected adult electoral participa-tion
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A11.1OK
6969 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Women still earn lessbut the gap is smaller for better-educated women
7070 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Differences in full-time, full-year earnings between women and men (2008)
Average annual full-time, full-year earnings of women as a percentage of men’s earnings
Sp
ain
Slo
ve
nia
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Ge
rma
ny
De
nm
ark
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Fin
lan
d
Gre
ece
Fra
nce
Au
stri
a
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Ire
lan
d
Au
stra
lia
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Ca
na
da
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rg
Isra
el
Po
rtu
ga
l
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Est
on
ia
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Hu
ng
ary
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Ko
rea
Sw
ed
en
Ita
ly
Bra
zil50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
Below upper secondary educationUpper secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary edu-cationTertiary education%
T A8.3a
albiser_e
EAG 2011: table A8.3a (25-64 year-olds)OK
7171 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Education and competitivenessUsing the skills potential
7272 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Net income in USD for 25-64 year-olds with a tertiary education (2009 or latest year
available)
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rgU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Au
stri
aIr
ela
nd
Ne
the
rla
nd
sA
ust
ralia
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mC
an
ad
aK
ore
aN
orw
ay
Ge
rma
ny
Ita
lyS
we
de
nO
EC
D A
ve
rag
eC
zech
Re
pu
blic
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
dD
en
ma
rkFin
lan
dIc
ela
nd
Fra
nce
Be
lgiu
mS
pa
inIs
rae
lS
love
nia
Po
rtu
ga
lG
ree
ceS
lova
k R
ep
ub
licH
un
ga
ryPo
lan
dE
sto
nia
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
Net income 3-year-average exchange rate
Net income (Purchasing Power Parity-adjusted)
Chart A10.4
USD
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A10.4OK
7373 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Labour costs for different qualificationsDeviation from the OECD mean in annual labour costs
(in USD for 25-64 year-olds)
Po
lan
dE
sto
nia
Hu
ng
ary
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
licPo
rtu
ga
lIs
rae
lG
ree
ceK
ore
aN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Slo
ve
nia
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licS
pa
inC
an
ad
aIc
ela
nd
Fra
nce
Fin
lan
dA
ust
ralia
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mB
elg
ium
Sw
ed
en
Ge
rma
ny
Ita
lyD
en
ma
rkU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
No
rwa
yIr
ela
nd
Ne
the
rla
nd
sA
ust
ria
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rg
-50,000
-30,000
-10,000
10,000
30,000
50,000
70,000
Below upper secondary education Upper secondary educationTertiary education
Chart A10.2
USD
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A10.2OK (USD or equivalent USD?)EAG 2010: Points to make; labour costs vary with skill (educational) levels. Higher educated in POL, SVK,HUN, CZE have big relative earnings advantage (Slide 4) but are still cheap in an international comparison (relative earnings will remain high). Higher educated in NZL and ESP are relatively inexpensive. Low educated (skilled) in FIN, SWE, BEL, DNK are relatively expensive to higher educated. Low skilled in the USA substantially cheaper than high skilled....updaté
7474 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
No
rwa
y
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Ita
ly
Ice
lan
d
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Ge
rma
ny
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Au
stri
a
De
nm
ark
Be
lgiu
m
Sw
ed
en
Fin
lan
d
Ca
na
da
Ko
rea
Au
stra
lia
Po
rtu
ga
l
Gre
ece
Sp
ain
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Hu
ng
ary
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Po
lan
d
-50,000
-40,000
-30,000
-20,000
-10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
T A10.1 & A10.2
Deviation from the OECD mean annual labour costs of tertiary-educated individuals, by age
groupsUSD 64 000 for 25-64 year-olds
and USD 50 000 for 25-34 year-olds
albiser_e
EAG 2011: table A10.1 (25-64) and A10.2 (25-34)PB in data?EAG 2010: Chart A10.1. Points to make; differences reflects in part productivity differentials and prevailing wage rates in countries, but also attractiveness of high end skills market in different countriesupdaté
7575 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Skills supply and skills premium Labour cost ratio of tertiary-educated individuals (5/6) to below upper
secondary individuals (0/1/2) and attainment levels
Chart A10.3
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Australie
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Czech Republic
DenmarkEstoniaNew Zealand
France
GermanyGreece
Hungary
Iceland
IrelandIsrael
Italy
Korea Luxembourg
Netherlands
FinlandNorway
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
United States
R² = 0.4856
Proportion of 45-54 year-olds with tertiary education (ISCED 5/6 )
Labour
cost
rati
o ISC
ED
5/6
to 0
/1/2
(4
5-5
4 y
ears
-old
)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A10.3OK
7676 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Education and competitivenessStudent mobility
7777 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
An increasingly mobile student population
In 2009, over 3.7 million tertiary students were enrolled outside their country of citizenship
New players are emerging in an increasingly competitive market for international education
Australia and the Russian Federation expanded their market share by two percentage points over the past decade, and Korea, New Zealand and Spain by one percentage point each
Share of the USA dropped from 23% to 18%Germany, the UK and Belgium also lost ground
Largest numbers of international students are from China, India and Korea
Rech_G
updatedà re-vérifier
7878 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Evolution by region of destination in the number of students enrolled outside their
country of citizenship (2000 to 2009)
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 0
500 000
1 000 000
1 500 000
2 000 000
2 500 000
3 000 000
3 500 000
4 000 000
Worldwide in OECD in EU countriesin G20 countries in North America
Chart C3.1
Number of foreign students
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C3.1OK
7979 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Distribution of foreign students in tertiary education, by country of destination (2009)
Percentage of foreign tertiary students (reported to the OECD) who are enrolled in each country of destination
United States 18.0
United Kingdom 9.9
Australia 7.0
Germany 7.0
France 6.8
Canada 5.2Russian Federation 3.7
Japan 3.6
Spain 2.3New Zealand 1.9Italy 1.8
China 1.7
South Africa 1.7
Austria 1.6
Korea 1.4
Switzerland 1.3
Belgium 1.3
Netherlands 1.2
Sweden 1.1
Other OECD countries 6.0
Other non-OECD countries 15.7
Chart C3.2
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C3.2OK
8080 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Distribution of foreign students in tertiary education, by country of origin (2009)
China, 16.5
India, 6.2
Korea, 3.8
Germany, 2.9
France, 1.6
United States, 1.6
Russian Fed-eration, 1.6
Turkey, 1.4Canada, 1.4
Japan, 1.4
Italy, 1.3
Indonesia, 1.1Saudi Arabia, 1.0
Poland, 1.0
Other OECD countries, 9.8
Other non-OECD G20 countries, 1.3
Other non-OECD non-G20 countries, 46.0
T C3.2
albiser_e
EAG 2011: table C3.2 (pie chart as cfor chart C3.2)To check with Pedro
8181 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Trends in international education market shares
Percentage of all foreign tertiary students enrolled by destination
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Au
str
ali
a
Ge
rma
ny
Fra
nce
Ca
na
da
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
...
Jap
an
Sp
ain
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Ita
ly
Ch
ina
So
uth
Afr
ica
Au
str
ia
Ko
rea
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Be
lgiu
m
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Sw
ed
en
Oth
er
OE
CD
Oth
er
no
n-O
EC
D
0
5
10
15
20
25
2000 2009
Chart C3.3
Market share (%)
The figure for other non-OECD countries refers to the part of the total foreign students studying in other G20 and non-OECD countries and is obtained after subtracting China, South Africa and the Russian Federation from the total in non-OECD destinations as estimated from UNESCO data.
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart C3.3 OK
8282 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Au
stra
lia
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Au
stri
a
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Be
lgiu
m
Ire
lan
d
Ca
na
da
¹
Sw
ed
en
De
nm
ark
Ice
lan
d
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Fin
lan
d
Hu
ng
ary
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Jap
an
Sp
ain
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Po
rtu
ga
l
No
rwa
y
Slo
ve
nia
Est
on
ia
Po
lan
d
Ch
ile
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
2009 OECD average
%
Chart C3.4
Student mobility in tertiary education (2009)Percentage of international students in tertiary enrolments
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C3.4 OK
8383 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Percentage of international students changing status and staying on in selected OECD countries, 2008 or
2009
Ca
na
da
Fra
nce
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Au
stra
lia
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Ge
rma
ny
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
No
rwa
y
Fin
lan
d
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Jap
an
Ire
lan
d
Sp
ain
Au
stri
a
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Chart C3.5
%
Percentage of students who have changed their status (whether for work, family or other reasons) among students who have not renewed their permits
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C3.5OK
8484 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
University-level graduation rate (first degree): Impact of international/foreign students (2009)
Po
lan
dN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Au
str
ali
aD
en
ma
rkN
eth
erl
an
ds
Fin
lan
dN
orw
ay
Jap
an
Un
ite
d S
tate
sC
an
ad
aS
we
de
nU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Sp
ain
Slo
ve
nia
Ge
rma
ny
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Au
str
iaE
sto
nia
Be
lgiu
m
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
er.
..Ic
ela
nd
Po
rtu
ga
lC
ze
ch
Re
pu
bli
cH
un
ga
ryF
ran
ce
Ita
lyB
razil
Ch
ile
Tu
rke
y
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Adjusted (excluding international students) International students
Chart A3.4
Foreign students
%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A3.4OK
8585 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Who pays for what, when and how?From primary to tertiary education
8686 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Investment in education OECD countries as a whole
spend 6.1% of their GDP on education Expenditure per student increased by 54%,
on average, between 1995 and 2008 Mixed pattern in tertiary education
Countries vary significantly in how they spend their money, different priorities on…… Salaries, learning time, teaching time,
class size Room for more effective cost-sharing
between government and households Even if household expenditure rose much faster
than public spending in tertiary education
albiser_e
to update
8787 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Expenditure on educational institutions as a percentage of GDP,
all levels of education (1995, 2000, 2008)
Ice
lan
d
Isra
el
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Ch
ile
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Arg
en
tin
a
Fra
nce
Me
xic
o
Po
lan
d
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Ire
lan
d
Au
stri
a
Po
rtu
ga
l
Sp
ain
Ita
ly
Hu
ng
ary
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2008 2000 1995% of GDP
Chart B2.1
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart B2.1OK
8888 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Expenditure on educational institutions and GDP,
Index of change (2000, 2008)
Bra
zil
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
tio
nIr
ela
nd
Ko
rea
No
rwa
yU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Me
xic
oIc
ela
nd
Hu
ng
ary
Ne
the
rla
nd
sB
elg
ium
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licS
pa
inD
en
ma
rkO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eC
hile
Un
ite
d S
tate
sFin
lan
dA
ust
ralia
Ca
na
da
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Po
rtu
ga
lIt
aly
Po
lan
dS
we
de
nE
sto
nia
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
licG
erm
an
yJa
pa
nA
ust
ria
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
dFra
nce
Isra
el80
90100110120130140150160170180190200
Change in expenditure
Change in gross domestic product
Change in expenditure on educational institutions as a percentage of GDP
Chart B2.1
Index of change
(2000=100)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart B2.1 (second part)OK
8989 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Total public expenditure on education as a percentage of total public expenditure (1995,2000,
2008)M
exic
oN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Bra
zil
Ch
ile
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Ch
ina
No
rwa
yK
ore
aD
en
ma
rkE
sto
nia
Un
ite
d S
tate
sIs
rae
lIr
ela
nd
Ice
lan
dS
we
de
nB
elg
ium
Au
str
ali
aF
inla
nd
Ca
na
da
Ne
the
rla
nd
sP
ola
nd
Slo
ve
nia
Po
rtu
ga
lA
ustr
iaS
pa
inU
nit
ed
Kin
...
Fra
nce
Ge
rma
ny
Hu
ng
ary
Slo
va
k R
ep
u..
.C
ze
ch
Re
pu
...
Jap
an
Ita
ly
0
5
10
15
20
25
2008 2000 1995 OECD average
% of total public expenditure
Chart B4.1
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart B4.1OK
9090 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Ire
lan
d
Sp
ain
Slo
ve
nia
Ge
rma
ny
Fin
lan
d
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Ko
rea
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Hu
ng
ary
Ch
ile
Bra
zil
Sw
itze
rla
nd
De
nm
ark
Jap
an
Est
on
ia
Arg
en
tin
a
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Core services Ancillary services and R&D Total
Chart B1.1
USD
Annual expenditure per student by educational institutions from primary through tertiary
education, by type of services (2008) in equivalent USD converted using purchasing power parities, based
on full-time equivalents
Rech_G
EAG 2011: Chart B1.1updated
9191 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Annual expenditure per student in primary, secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary
education (2008) in equivalent USD converted using purchasing power parities,
based on full-time equivalents
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rg
No
rwa
y
Au
stri
a
Ice
lan
d
Sw
ed
en
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Ire
lan
d
Slo
ve
nia
Ca
na
da
Fin
lan
d
Au
stra
lia
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Est
on
ia
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Hu
ng
ary
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Ch
ile
Bra
zil0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
OECD averageUSD
TB1.2
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart B1.2 (primary to post-secondary non-trertiary: data to be taken from table B1.2, col. 3OK
9292 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Annual expenditure per student in tertiary education (2008)
in equivalent USD converted using purchasing power parities,based on full-time equivalents
Un
ite
d S
tate
sS
wit
zerl
an
dC
an
ad
aS
we
de
nN
orw
ay
De
nm
ark
Ne
the
rla
nd
sIr
ela
nd
Fin
lan
dG
erm
an
yU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Au
stri
aA
ust
ralia
Be
lgiu
mJa
pa
nFr
an
ceS
pa
inIs
rae
lB
razi
lN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Ice
lan
dPo
rtu
ga
lIt
aly
Slo
ve
nia
Ko
rea
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licM
exi
coH
un
ga
ryPo
lan
dC
hile
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
tio
nS
lova
k R
ep
ub
licC
hin
aA
rge
nti
na
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
OECD average
Chart B1.2
USD
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart B1.2 (tertiary only)OK
9393 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Expenditure on educational institutions per student at various levels of education for all services relative
to primary education (2008)Primary education = 100
Bra
zil
Me
xic
oU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Ge
rma
ny
Ch
ileN
eth
erl
an
ds
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Isra
el
Fra
nce
Au
stra
liaS
we
de
nC
zech
Re
pu
blic
Fin
lan
dIr
ela
nd
Jap
an
Po
rtu
ga
lO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Sp
ain
Be
lgiu
mA
rge
nti
na
De
nm
ark
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mN
orw
ay
Ko
rea
Hu
ng
ary
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
licA
ust
ria
Po
lan
dIt
aly
Ice
lan
d
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350539
Pre-primary education Secondary education Tertiary education
Chart B1.3
Index
Level of expenditure higher than for primary education
Level of expenditure lower than for primary education
Rech_G
EAG 2011: chart B1.3Updated
9494 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Annual expenditure per primary student by educational institutions
relative to GDP per capita (2008)1
0,0
00
12
,50
0
15
,00
0
17
,50
0
20
,00
0
22
,50
0
25
,00
0
27
,50
0
30
,00
0
32
,50
0
35
,00
0
37
,50
0
40
,00
0
42
,50
0
45
,00
0
47
,50
0
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
MEX
CHL CZESVK
POL
HUN
DEUKOR
ISRNZL
PRTFRA
FINESP
AUS
IRLNLD
JPNBEL
SWEUKMITA
AUTCHE
ISL NOR
USA
BRA
DNK
EST
ARG
R² = 0.793812641561838
Expenditure per student (in equivalent USD converted using PPPs)
GDP per capita (in equivalent USD converted using PPPs)
Chart B1.5
Rech_G
EAG 2011: Chart B1.5 (primary)updated
9595 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Annual expenditure per secondary student by educational institutions
relative to GDP per capita (2008)
10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 450000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
BRA
CHL
MEX
SVK
POLHUN
CZE ISRNZL
PRTKOR FIN
DEUSVN
ESP
JPNISLITASWE
BEL
UKMAUS
IRLFRA NLD
AUTUSA
NOR
DNK
EST
ARG
R² = 0.861849348607654
Expenditure per student (in equivalent USD converted using PPPs)
GDP per capita (in equivalent USD converted using PPPs)
Chart B1.5
Rech_G
EAG 2011: Chart B1.5 (secondary)updated
9696 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Po
lan
dK
ore
aS
pa
inPo
rtu
ga
lE
sto
nia
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mA
ust
ria
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licFin
lan
dJa
pa
nFra
nce
Me
xic
oD
en
ma
rkIr
ela
nd
Ca
na
da
OE
CD
ave
rag
eN
orw
ay
Be
lgiu
mIt
aly
Au
stra
liaG
erm
an
yS
we
de
nS
lova
k R
ep
ub
licIc
ela
nd
Ne
the
rla
nd
sU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Bra
zil
Isra
el
Hu
ng
ary
Ch
ile
708090
100110120130140150160170180190200210
Change in expenditure
Change in the number of students (in full-time equivalents)
Change in expenditure per student
Chart B1.6
Index of change (2000 = 100)
Changes in student numbers and expenditure
for tertiary educationIndex of change between 2000 and 2008 (2000=100, 2008 constant prices)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart B1.6OK
9797 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Un
ite
d S
tate
sK
ore
aC
an
ad
aC
hile
Fin
lan
dN
orw
ay
Isra
el
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
dS
we
de
nN
eth
erl
an
ds
Au
stra
liaO
EC
D a
ve
rag
ePo
lan
dIr
ela
nd
Fra
nce
Be
lgiu
mPo
rtu
ga
lA
ust
ria
Me
xic
oS
pa
inU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licS
wit
zerl
an
dG
erm
an
yS
love
nia
Ita
lyS
lova
k R
ep
ub
licH
un
ga
ryB
razi
lD
en
ma
rkR
uss
ian
Fe
de
ra..
.Ja
pa
nE
sto
nia
Ice
lan
dA
rge
nti
na
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Total expenditure on educational institutionsResearch and development (R&D)Ancillary services (transport, meals, housing provided by institutions)Educational core services
Chart B6.2
% of GDP
Expenditure on core services, R&D and ancillary services in tertiary educational institutions
as a percentage of GDP (2008)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart B6.2OK
9898 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Share of private expenditure on educational institutions (2008)
percentage, by level of education
Ch
ileK
ore
aJa
pa
nU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Un
ite
d S
tate
sA
ust
ralia
Isra
el
Ca
na
da
Po
rtu
ga
lR
uss
ian
Fe
de
rati
on
OE
CD
ave
rag
ePo
lan
dM
exic
oN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Ita
lyN
eth
erl
an
ds
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
licE
sto
nia
Sp
ain
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licA
rge
nti
na
Fra
nce
Ire
lan
dS
love
nia
Au
stri
aG
erm
an
yS
we
de
nB
elg
ium
Ice
lan
dFin
lan
dD
en
ma
rkN
orw
ay
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rg
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Primary, secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education
Tertiary education%
Chart B3.1
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart B3.1OK
9999 1
3 S
ep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Share of private expenditure on tertiary educational institutions (2000, 2005, 2008)
percentage, by level of education
Ch
ile
Ko
rea
Jap
an
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Au
stra
lia
Isra
el
Ca
na
da
Po
rtu
ga
l
Po
lan
d
Me
xic
o
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Ita
ly
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Est
on
ia
Sp
ain
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Fra
nce
Ire
lan
d
Slo
ve
nia
Au
stri
a
Ge
rma
ny
Sw
ed
en
Be
lgiu
m
Ice
lan
d
Fin
lan
d
De
nm
ark
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2008 2005 2000
Chart B3.3
%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart B3.3 first partOK
100100
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
This chart does not take into
account grants, subsidies or loans that partially or fully offset the students’ tuition
fees
Average annual tuition fees charged by tertiary-type A public institutions for full-time national students
(academic year 2008-09)
Portugal (84%, 10 373), Italy (50%, 9 556),
Spain (46%, 13 928),
Czech Republic (59%, 8 738), Denmark (55%, 17 634), Finland (69%, 15 402), Ireland (51%, 16 284), Iceland (77%, 10 429), Mexico (35%, 7 504), Norway
(77%, 18 942), Sweden (68%, 20 864)
Canada (m, 24 384)
New Zealand (78%, 11 125)
Japan (49%, 16 533), Australia (94%, 16 297),
Netherlands (63%, 17 245)
United Kingdom1 (61%, 15 314)
Belgium (Fr. and Fl.) (m, m)France (m, 14 945)
0
500
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
USD
Chart B5.2
1. Public institutions do not exist at this level of education and most students are enrolled in government-dependent private institutions.
United States (70%, 29 910)6000
Korea (71%, 10 109)
Austria (54%, 15 081), Switzerland (41%, 23 284)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart B5.2OK
101101
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Public subsidies for education in tertiary education (2008)Public subsidies for education to households and other private entities as a percentage of total public expenditure on education, by type of
subsidy
Ch
ileU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Au
stri
aD
en
ma
rkS
love
nia
Ita
lyS
lova
k R
ep
ub
licN
orw
ay
Un
ite
d S
tate
sE
sto
nia
Fin
lan
dPo
rtu
ga
lH
un
ga
ryB
elg
ium
Ire
lan
dG
erm
an
yN
eth
erl
an
ds
Isra
el
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
dA
ust
ralia
Sw
ed
en
Ko
rea
Sp
ain
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Fra
nce
Bra
zil
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licM
exic
oC
an
ad
aJa
pa
nPo
lan
dA
rge
nti
na
Ice
lan
d0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Student loans
Transfers and payments to other private entities
Scholarships/ other grants to households
OECD average
Chart B5.3
% of total public ex-penditure on education
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart B5.3OK
102102
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Average tuition fees and proportion of students who benefit from public loans and/or scholarships/grants
Tertiary-type A, public institutions, academic year 2008/09, national full-time students
0 25 50 75 1000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
United States
Japan
Australia
New Zealand
NetherlandsItaly
SpainAustria
Belgium (Fl.)Belgium (Fr.)
France
Switzerland
Finland
Norway
DanemarkSweden
IcelandMexico
Chart B5.1 % of students who benefit from public loans AND/OR sholarships/grants
Ave
rage
tui
tion
fee
s ch
arge
d by
pub
lic in
stitu
tion
s in
USD
Group 1:No (or low) financial barriers for tertiary
studies due to tuition fees and still a high level of student aid.
Group 2:Potentially high financial
barriers for entry to tertiary-type A
education, but also large public subsidies to
students.
Group 3:Extensive and broadly uniform cost sharing
across students, student support systems somewhat less
developed.
Group 4:Relatively low financial
barriers to entry to tertiary education and relatively low subsidies
Bubble size shows
graduation rates
albiser_e
Rech_G24/08/2011EAG 2011: chart B5.1OK
103103
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Who pays for what, when and how?School education
104104
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Bra
zil
Est
on
iaS
lova
k R
ep
ub
licIr
ela
nd
Ko
rea
Po
lan
dH
un
ga
ryC
zech
Re
pu
blic
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mIc
ela
nd
Ch
ileO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eS
pa
inFin
lan
dA
ust
ralia
Ne
the
rla
nd
sC
an
ad
aS
we
de
nS
wit
zerl
an
dN
orw
ay
Be
lgiu
mM
exic
oU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Jap
an
Isra
el
Au
stri
aD
en
ma
rkPo
rtu
ga
lG
erm
an
yIt
aly
Fra
nce
70
90
110
130
150
170
190
210
230
Change in expenditureChange in the number of students (in full-time equivalents)Change in expenditure per student
Chart B1.6
Index of change (2000 = 100)
Changes in student numbers and expenditurePrimary, secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education
Index of change between 2000 and 2008 (2000=100, 2008 constant prices)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart B1.6 ( primary, secondary, post-secondary non tertiary)OK
105105
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Cumulative expenditure on educational institutions per student over primary and secondary studies
(2008) Annual expenditure on educational institutions per student multiplied by the theoretical
duration of studies, in equivalent USD converted using PPPs
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rgS
wit
zerl
an
dN
orw
ay
Ice
lan
dD
en
ma
rkU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Au
stri
aIr
ela
nd
Ita
lyB
elg
ium
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mS
we
de
nS
love
nia
Fra
nce
Sp
ain
Au
stra
liaG
erm
an
yJa
pa
nN
eth
erl
an
ds
Fin
lan
dN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Ko
rea
Po
rtu
ga
lE
sto
nia
Isra
el
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licPo
lan
dH
un
ga
ryS
lova
k R
ep
ub
licC
hile
Me
xic
oB
razi
l0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
Primary educationLower secondaryUpper secondary educationAll secondary education
TB1.3b (web)
In equivalent USD using PPPs
OECD average (primary and secondary)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: table B1.3b (web only)OK
106106
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Po
rtu
ga
l
Arg
en
tin
a
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rg
Jap
an
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Sp
ain
Ire
lan
d
Ge
rma
ny
Fra
nce
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Ca
na
da
Slo
ve
nia
Au
stri
a
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Ko
rea
Po
lan
d
Fin
lan
d
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Compensation of all staffOther current expenditure
Chart B6.1
Distribution of current expenditure by educational institutions
for primary, secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education (2008)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart B6.1OK
107107
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Sp
ain
De
nm
ark
Be
lgiu
m (
Fl.)
Po
rtu
ga
lB
elg
ium
(Fr.
)G
erm
an
yG
ree
ceN
eth
erl
an
ds
Ire
lan
dA
ust
ria
Jap
an
No
rwa
yA
ust
ralia
Fra
nce
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mK
ore
aU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Ice
lan
dIt
aly
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
dFin
lan
dS
love
nia
Isra
el
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licPo
lan
dH
un
ga
ryT
urk
ey
Est
on
iaC
hile
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
Contribution of teachers' salary
Contribution of instruction time
Contribution of teaching time
Contribution of estimated class size
Difference with OECD average
Chart B7.1
In equivalent USD using PPPs
Contribution (in USD) of various factors to salary cost per upper secondary student
(2008)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart B7.1OK
108108
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Be
lgiu
m (
Fl.)
Be
lgiu
m (
Fr.
)S
pa
inPo
rtu
ga
lIr
ela
nd
De
nm
ark
Gre
ece
Au
stri
aG
erm
an
yA
ust
ralia
Fin
lan
dN
orw
ay
Slo
ve
nia
Ita
lyJa
pa
nN
eth
erl
an
ds
Un
ite
d S
tate
sU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Ice
lan
dK
ore
aN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Fra
nce
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licIs
rae
lH
un
ga
ryPo
lan
dE
sto
nia
Me
xic
oC
hile
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
Contribution of teachers' salaryContribution of instruction timeContribution of teaching timeContribution of estimated class sizeDifference with OECD average
TB7.2
In equivalent USD using PPPs
Contribution (in USD) of various factors to salary cost per lower secondary student
(2008)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: table B7.2OK
109109
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rgD
en
ma
rkS
wit
zerl
an
dN
orw
ay
Sp
ain
Be
lgiu
m (
Fl.)
Gre
ece
Po
rtu
ga
lB
elg
ium
(Fr.
)U
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Ire
lan
dG
erm
an
yIt
aly
Au
stri
aA
ust
ralia
Ne
the
rla
nd
sIc
ela
nd
Fin
lan
dJa
pa
nK
ore
aN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mS
love
nia
Fra
nce
Hu
ng
ary
Po
lan
dIs
rae
lC
zech
Re
pu
blic
Tu
rke
yE
sto
nia
Me
xic
oC
hile
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
Contribution of teachers' salaryContribution of instruction timeContribution of teaching timeContribution of estimated class sizeDifference with OECD average
TB7.1
In equivalent USD using PPPs
Contribution (in USD) of various factors to salary cost per primary student (2008)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: table B7.1OK
110110
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Difference between the salary cost per student and the OECD average,
by level of education (2008)
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rgS
wit
zerl
an
dS
pa
inD
en
ma
rkB
elg
ium
(Fl.)
Po
rtu
ga
lB
elg
ium
(Fr.
)G
erm
an
yG
ree
ceN
eth
erl
an
ds
Ire
lan
dA
ust
ria
Jap
an
No
rwa
yA
ust
ralia
Fra
nce
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mK
ore
aU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Ice
lan
dIt
aly
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
dFin
lan
dS
love
nia
Isra
el
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licPo
lan
dH
un
ga
ryT
urk
ey
Est
on
iaC
hile
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
Lower secondary education
Primary education
Upper secondary education
Chart B7.3
In equivalent USD using PPPs
Luxembourg: More than USD 7 000 in secondary education
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart B7.3OK
111111
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
ItalyAustralia
IsraelBelgium (Fr.)Netherlands
MexicoFranceIreland
SpainLuxembourg
PortugalEngland
Belgium (Fl.)Turkey
ChileAustria
OECD averageDenmark
IcelandGermany
JapanGreece
Slovak RepublicNorway
HungaryCzech Republic
KoreaSweden
Russian Federa-tion
SloveniaFinlandEstoniaPoland
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000
Ages 7 to 8 Ages 9 to 11 Ages 12 to 14
Chart D1.1Total number of intended instruction time in hours
Total number of intended instruction hours in public institutions between the ages of 7 and 14
(2009)
Students in OECD countries are expected to receive, on average, 6 732 hours of instruction between the ages of 7 and 14, of which 1 550 between ages 7 and 8, 2 462 between ages 9 and 11, and 2 720 between ages 12 and 14. The large majority of intended hours of instruction is compulsory.
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D1.1OK
112112
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Relationships between performance in science and total science learning time (PISA 2006)
3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0350
400
450
500
550
600
Russian Federation
Greece
Mexico
United Kingdom
Canada
Indonesia
United States
Portugal
Korea
Turkey
New Zealand
Italy
Estonia
SpainPoland
GermanyHungary
Slovenia
DenmarkNorway
Australia
Israel
France
Chile
Brazil
Finland
Slovak Republic
Czech RepublicSweden
Iceland
Argentina
Belgium
Luxembourg
Ireland
AustriaNetherlands
Switzerland
Japan
Box D1.2 Total science learning time (hours per week)
R²=0,02
ScoreMore total learning time does not necessarily mean better performance …
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart box D1.2OK
113113
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Relationships between performance in science and relative learning time in regular school science lessons
(PISA 2006)(Share of learning hours in regular school lessons out of total science learning
time)
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80350
400
450
500
550
600
Greece
Mexico
Russian Federation
Chile
Brazil
Turkey
Hungary
Argentina
Poland
Italy
Israel
Indonesia
Portugal
SloveniaNetherlands
Germany
United StatesSpainSlovak Republic
Norway
Estonia
Switzerland
France
Belgium
Austria
Ireland
Canada
Denmark
Sweden
Korea
Czech Republic
Iceland
United Kingdom
Finland
Australia
New ZealandJapan
Luxembourg
Box D1.2 Share of learning hours in regular school lessons out of total science learning time (%)
Score
R²=0,50
…while the higher the percentage of students’ total learning time spent during normal school hours, the better countries perform.
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart box D1.2OK
114114
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Ch
ina
Ch
ileK
ore
aJa
pa
nIs
rae
lIn
do
ne
sia
Arg
en
tin
aT
urk
ey
Bra
zil
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mIr
ela
nd
Au
stra
liaU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Fra
nce
Ge
rma
ny
Sp
ain
Hu
ng
ary
Po
rtu
ga
lB
elg
ium
(Fr.
)C
zech
Re
pu
blic
Me
xic
oFin
lan
dS
wit
zerl
an
dD
en
ma
rkA
ust
ria
Ita
lyPo
lan
dS
love
nia
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
licE
sto
nia
Ice
lan
dG
ree
ceR
uss
ian
Fe
de
rati
on
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rg
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2009 2000
Chart D2.1
Number of studentsper classroom
Average class size in primary education (2000, 2009)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D2.1OK
115115
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Ch
ina
Ind
on
esi
aK
ore
aJa
pa
nIs
rae
lC
hile
Bra
zil
Me
xico
Arg
en
tin
aG
erm
an
yFr
an
ceS
pa
inA
ust
ralia
Pola
nd
Un
ite
d S
tate
sPo
rtu
ga
lA
ust
ria
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licH
un
ga
ryG
ree
ceIt
aly
Slo
vak
Re
pu
blic
Fin
lan
dE
sto
nia
De
nm
ark
Slo
ven
iaU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Ice
lan
dLu
xem
bo
urg
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
tio
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2009 2000
Tables D2.1 and D2.4
Number of studentsper classroom
Average class size in lower secondary education
(2000, 2009)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D2.1OK
116116
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Ch
ina
Ind
on
esi
aK
ore
aJa
pa
nIs
rae
lC
hile
Bra
zil
Me
xic
oA
rge
nti
na
Ge
rma
ny
Fra
nce
Sp
ain
OE
CD
ave
rag
eA
ust
ralia
Po
lan
dU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Po
rtu
ga
lA
ust
ria
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licH
un
ga
ryG
ree
ceIt
aly
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
licFin
lan
dE
sto
nia
De
nm
ark
Slo
ve
nia
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mIc
ela
nd
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rgS
wit
zerl
an
dR
uss
ian
Fe
de
ra..
.T
urk
ey
Ire
lan
dB
elg
ium
(Fr.
)0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Primary educationLower secondary education
Number of stu-dents per classroom
Chart D2.2
Average class size in educational institutions,
by level of education (2009)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D2.2OK
117117
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Average class size in national language-of-instruction classes for 15-year-olds (2009)
Shanghai-C
hin
aJa
pan
Chile
Kore
aM
exi
coIn
donesi
aB
razi
lH
ungary
Isra
el
Slo
venia
Arg
entina
Turk
ey
France
Canada
United K
ingdom
Germ
any
OEC
D a
vera
ge
United S
tate
sN
ew
Zeala
nd
Slo
vak
Republic
Cze
ch R
epublic
Neth
erl
ands
Norw
ay
Aust
ralia
Irela
nd
Gre
ece
Est
onia
Pola
nd
Port
ugal
Spain
Russ
ian F
edera
tion
Sw
eden
Luxe
mbourg
Italy
Aust
ria
Denm
ark
Finla
nd
Icela
nd
Sw
itze
rland
Belg
ium
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Average class size
Chart box D2.1
Number of stu-dents per classroom
Difference between smallest 10% of classes and largest 10% of classes
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart box D2.1OK
118118
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Teachers' salaries (minimum, after 10 years experience, 15 years experience, and maximum) in lower secondary
education (2009)Annual statutory teachers’ salaries in public institutions in lower
secondary education, in equivalent USD converted using PPPs
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rg
Ge
rma
ny
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Ko
rea
Sco
tla
nd
Au
stra
lia
Be
lgiu
m (
Fl.)
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Fin
lan
d
Po
rtu
ga
l
Ita
ly
Fra
nce
Gre
ece
Isra
el
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Po
lan
d
Hu
ng
ary
Ind
on
esi
a
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
Salary after 15 years of experience/ minimum trainingStarting salary/ minimum trainingSalary at the top of scale/ minimum trainingSalary after 10 years of experience/minimum training
Equivalent USD conver-ted using PPPs
Chart D3.1
The annual statutory salaries of lower secondary teachers with 15 years of experience range from less than USD 15 000 in Hungary, the Slovak Republic and the partner country Indonesia to over USD 54 000 or more in Denmark, Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands, and more than USD 111 000 in Luxembourg.
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D3.1OK
119119
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Sp
ain
Po
rtu
ga
l
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rg
Ko
rea
Ge
rma
ny
De
nm
ark
Fin
lan
d
Be
lgiu
m (
Fl.)
Sco
tla
nd
Ire
lan
d
Be
lgiu
m (
Fr.
)
Au
stra
lia
Fra
nce
Est
on
ia
En
gla
nd
Slo
ve
nia
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Sw
ed
en
Isra
el
Po
lan
d
No
rwa
y
Ita
ly
Au
stri
a
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Ice
lan
d
Hu
ng
ary
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
0
1
2
Chart D3.1
Teachers’ payRatio of salary after 15 years of experience/minimum training
to earnings for full-time, full-year workers with tertiary education aged 25 to 64 (2009 or latest available year)
Teachers fare worse than tertiary-educated workers
Teachers fare better than tertiary-educated workers
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D3.1, second partOK
120120
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Changes in lower secondary teachers’ salaries after 15 years of experience/minimum training (1995, 2000, 2005,
2009)Index of change between 2005 and 1995, 2000 and 2009, (2005 =
100, constant prices)
Est
on
iaC
zech
Re
pu
blic
De
nm
ark
Ire
lan
dN
eth
erl
an
ds
Ice
lan
dIs
rae
lN
orw
ay
Port
ug
al
Sp
ain
Luxe
mb
ou
rgB
elg
ium
(Fr.
)G
ree
ceA
ust
ria
Be
lgiu
m (
Fl.)
Fin
lan
dS
we
de
nO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eM
exi
coE
ng
lan
dS
wit
zerl
an
dS
cotl
an
dIt
aly
Ko
rea
Un
ite
d S
tate
sA
ust
ralia
Jap
an
Fra
nce
Hu
ng
ary
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
200919952000
Chart D3.2
Index of change
2005=100
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D3.2OK
121121
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Trends in the ratio of salaries after 15 years of experience/minimum training to GDP per capita
(2000, 2005, 2009)K
ore
aM
exic
oG
erm
an
yPo
rtu
ga
lS
pa
inS
wit
zerl
an
dC
hile
Jap
an
Ire
lan
dN
eth
erl
an
ds
Sco
tla
nd
De
nm
ark
En
gla
nd
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rgO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eS
love
nia
Be
lgiu
m (
Fl.)
Au
stra
liaB
elg
ium
(Fr.
)Fin
lan
dIt
aly
Gre
ece
Au
stri
aFra
nce
No
rwa
yIs
rae
lU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Po
lan
dS
we
de
nC
zech
Re
pu
blic
Ice
lan
dE
sto
nia
Hu
ng
ary
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
licIn
do
ne
sia
0
1
2
32009 2000 2005
Chart D3.3
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D3.3OK
122122
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Number of teaching hours per year, by level of education (2009)
Net statutory contact time in hours per year in public institutions
Arg
en
tin
a
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Sco
tla
nd
Bra
zil
Ge
rma
ny
Ire
lan
d
En
gla
nd
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Be
lgiu
m (
Fl.)
No
rwa
y
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Tu
rke
y
Est
on
ia
Ita
ly
Ice
lan
d
Jap
an
Fin
lan
d
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
...
Gre
ece
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Lower secondary educationPrimary educationUpper secondary education, general programmes
Hours per year
Chart D4.2
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D4.2OK
123123
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Number of teaching hours per year in lower secondary education (2000, 2005 and 2009)
Net statutory contact time in hours per year in public institutions
Ch
ileU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Me
xic
oS
cotl
an
dA
ust
ralia
Bra
zil
Po
rtu
ga
lG
erm
an
yN
eth
erl
an
ds
Ire
lan
dIn
do
ne
sia
En
gla
nd
Sp
ain
Slo
ve
nia
Be
lgiu
m (
Fl.)
OE
CD
ave
rag
eB
elg
ium
(Fr.
)N
orw
ay
De
nm
ark
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
licFra
nce
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rgE
sto
nia
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licIt
aly
Ko
rea
Ice
lan
dA
ust
ria
Jap
an
Hu
ng
ary
Fin
lan
dIs
rae
lR
uss
ian
Fe
de
rati
on
Po
lan
dG
ree
ce
0100200300400500600700800900
1,0001,1001,2001,300
2009 2000 2005
Chart D4.1
Hours per year
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart D4.1OK
124124
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Lifelong learning is becoming a reality……but not for all
Those who need it most get the least of it
125125
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Chart C5.4
Participation of 25-64 year-olds in formal and/or non-formal education (2007)
Sw
ed
en
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Fin
lan
d
No
rwa
y
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Ge
rma
ny
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
De
nm
ark
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Ca
na
da
Est
on
ia
Au
stri
a
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Slo
ve
nia
Be
lgiu
m
Au
stra
lia
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Fra
nce
Sp
ain
Ko
rea
Ire
lan
d
Po
rtu
ga
l
Ita
ly
Po
lan
d
Gre
ece
Hu
ng
ary
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Formal Formal and non-formal
Non-formal%
clements_n
This is not a graph...just a picture. Do you have the original data?
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C5.4OK
126126
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Expected hours over the working life in all non-formal education and in job-related
non-formal education (2007) D
en
ma
rk
Sw
ed
en
Fin
lan
d
No
rwa
y
Au
stri
a
Ge
rma
ny
Be
lgiu
m
Sw
itze
rla
nd
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Est
on
ia
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Sp
ain
Ca
na
da
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Po
rtu
ga
l
Un
ite
d K
in..
.
Ko
rea
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Po
lan
d
Slo
ve
nia
Gre
ece
Ita
ly
Hu
ng
ary
Tu
rke
y
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
All non-formal education
Job-related non-formal education
Chart C5.1
Hours
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C5.1 (change: NFE and JR NFE)updated (titre du précédent graphique différent à celui de 2011)OK
127127
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Participation rate in all non-formal education and in job-related non-formal education, hours of instruction per participant and
per adult in job-related non-formal education, 2007
Sw
ed
en
Fin
lan
dN
orw
ay
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Un
ite
d S
tate
sG
erm
an
yN
eth
erl
an
ds
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
licU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Est
on
iaA
ust
ria
De
nm
ark
Slo
ve
nia
Ca
na
da
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
licO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Be
lgiu
mFra
nce
Au
stra
liaS
pa
inK
ore
aIr
ela
nd
Po
rtu
ga
lIt
aly
Po
lan
dT
urk
ey
Gre
ece
Hu
ng
ary
0
10
20
3040
50
60
7080
90
100
110120
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Hours of job-related non-formal education per participant (left hand axis)Hours of job-related non-formal education per adult (left hand axis)Participation all non-formal education (right hand axis)
Chart C5.2
Mean number of
hours%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C5.2 (change: per participant)updatedOK
128128
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Hours of instruction per employed participant in job-related non-formal education,by educational attainment (2007)
De
nm
ark
Hu
ng
ary
Be
lgiu
m
Au
stri
a
Sp
ain
No
rwa
y
Fin
lan
d
Po
rtu
ga
l
Gre
ece
Po
lan
d
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Sw
ed
en
Ge
rma
ny
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Ca
na
da
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Tu
rke
y
Slo
va
k R
ep
u..
.
Est
on
ia
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Ko
rea
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Un
ite
d K
in..
.
Ita
ly
Slo
ve
nia
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Not attained ISCED 3 Attained ISCED 3/4 Attained ISCED 5/6
Chart C5.3
Hours of instruction
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C5.3OK
129129
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Proportion of individuals who have looked for and found information, by educational
attainment, 2007N
eth
erl
an
ds
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Fin
lan
d
Ko
rea
Au
stri
a
Ca
na
da
Sw
ed
en
Au
stra
lia
Slo
ve
nia
Po
rtu
ga
l
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Po
lan
d
Fra
nce
Sp
ain
Be
lgiu
m
Ge
rma
ny
Ita
ly
Gre
ece
Hu
ng
ary
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Not attained ISCED 3 Attained ISCED 3/4 Attained ISCED 5/6
found information (<ISCED 3) found information (ISCED 3/4) found information (ISCED 5/6)
Chart A3.2
%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C5.5OKEAG 2010: Points to make; labour costs vary with skill (educational) levels. Higher educated in POL, SVK,HUN, CZE have big relative earnings advantage (Slide 4) but are still cheap in an international comparison (relative earnings will remain high). Higher educated in NZL and ESP are relatively inexpensive. Low educated (skilled) in FIN, SWE, BEL, DNK are relatively expensive to higher educated. Low skilled in the USA substantially cheaper than high skilled....
130130
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Participation in non-formal education, by force status, 2007
Sw
ed
en
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Fin
lan
d
No
rwa
y
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Ge
rma
ny
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Est
on
ia
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Au
stri
a
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Slo
ve
nia
Co
un
try a
ve
rag
e
De
nm
ark
Be
lgiu
m
Ca
na
da
Au
stra
lia
Sp
ain
Po
rtu
ga
l
Ire
lan
d
Ita
ly
Po
lan
d
Ko
rea
Gre
ece
Hu
ng
ary
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Employed Unemployed Not in the labour force
Table C5.3d
%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C5.5OKEAG 2010: Points to make; labour costs vary with skill (educational) levels. Higher educated in POL, SVK,HUN, CZE have big relative earnings advantage (Slide 4) but are still cheap in an international comparison (relative earnings will remain high). Higher educated in NZL and ESP are relatively inexpensive. Low educated (skilled) in FIN, SWE, BEL, DNK are relatively expensive to higher educated. Low skilled in the USA substantially cheaper than high skilled....
131131
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Education and equity
132132
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Relationship between student vulnerability and inequality associated with parents’
education (PISA 2009)
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.40
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Indonesia
ArgentinaBrazil
Mexico
Chile
Russian FederationTurkey
AustriaCzech Republic Slovak RepublicLuxembourg
IsraelGreeceSlovenia
Spain
Italy Portugal
United KingdomUnited States
Hungary
Denmark
Sweden
France Germany
Ireland
Poland
Switzerland
Netherlands
Iceland
Estonia
Norway
Belgium
AustraliaNew Zealand
Japan
Canada Finland Korea
Shanghai-China
Chart D6.1
High level of vulnerabilityLow level of inequality
High level of vulnerabil-ityHigh level of inequality
Low level of vulnerabil-ityLow level of inequality
Low level of vulner-ability
High level of inequal-ity
% students with reading scores below level 3
Relative risk for low parental education
albiser_e
Rech_G29/08/2011EAG 2011: chart D6.1OK
133133
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
School accountability
134134
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Performance accountability in public schools (2009)
Chart D5.1
Existence of national examinati
ons
Primary Lower
secondary
Upper secondar
y
Existence of national assessmen
ts
Primary Lower
secondary
Upper secondar
y
Australia
Austria
Belgiu
m (Fl.)
Belgiu
m (Fr.)
Chile
Czech Repu
blic
Den
mark
England
Estonia
Finland
Fra
nce
Germany
Gre
ece
Hung
ary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembo
urg
Mexico
Neth
erlan
ds
Norw
ay
Poland
Portugal
Scotland
Slovak Repu
blic
Spain
Sweden
Turkey
United
States
Brazil
Indon
esia
Russian
Fed
eration
No examination or assessment One or two subjects assessed Three or four subjects assessed
Five or more subjects assessed Not applicable
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D5.1 one slide for performance accountability and one slide for regulatory accountabilityOK
135135
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Regulatory accountability in public schools (2009)
Chart D5.1
School inspections required
Primary
Lower secondary
Upper secondary
School self-
evaluations required
Primary
Lower secondary
Upper secondary
A
ustr
alia
Austria
Belgiu
m (Fl.)
Belgiu
m (Fr.)
Chile
Czech
Republi
c
Denmark
Engl
and
Estonia
Finl
and
France
German
y
Greece
Hungary
Icel
and
Irel
and
Israe
l
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherl
ands
Norw
ay
Pola
nd
Port
ugal
Scotland
Slovak Republi
c
Spain
Sw
eden
Turkey
United
States
Brazil
Indonesia
Russian
Federatio
n
No required school inspections or school self-evaluations
School inspections or school self-evaluations required but frequency unknown
No requirement for the frequency of inspections or self-evaluations Once every 3+ years Once every two or three years
Once a year or more often Not applicable Missing
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D5.1 one slide for performance accountability and one slide for regulatory accountabilityOK
136136
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Distribution of influence of school inspections, by domains (2009)
Eva
lua
tio
n o
f sc
ho
ol p
...
Eva
lua
tio
n o
f sc
ho
ol a
dm
...
Th
e lik
elih
oo
d o
f a
sch
o..
.
Eva
lua
tio
n o
f in
div
idu
al...
Th
e a
ssis
tan
ce p
rovid
ed
...
Th
e p
rovis
ion
of
an
oth
er.
..
Th
e s
ize
of
the
sch
oo
l ..
.
Th
e r
em
un
era
tio
n a
nd
b..
.0
5
10
15
20
25
Not applicable No influence at all Low level of influence Moderate level of influence High level of influence
Chart D5.2
Numberof countries
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D5.2OK
137137
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Areas for school inspections and school self-evaluations at the lower secondary level
(2009)
Compliance with rules
and regula-tions
Quality of instruction
Student per-for-
mance
Financial man-
agement
Satisfaction and per-
ceptions of students
Satisfaction and per-
ceptions of parents
Satisfaction and per-
ceptions of staff
0
5
10
15
20
25
School inspections
School self-evaluations
Chart D5.3
Numberof countries
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart D5.3OK
138138
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Thank you !
www.oecd.org– All national and international publications– The complete micro-level database
Email: [email protected]
…and remember:
Without data, you are just another person with an opinion
139139
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Ire
lan
dFin
lan
dIs
rae
lC
zech
Re
pu
blic
Po
lan
dS
lova
k R
ep
ub
licS
we
de
nIt
aly
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
dJa
pa
nH
un
ga
ryB
elg
ium
Ch
ileA
ust
ralia
Ne
the
rla
nd
sK
ore
aO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eIc
ela
nd
No
rwa
yE
sto
nia
De
nm
ark
G2
0 a
ve
rag
eG
erm
an
yR
uss
ian
Fe
de
ra..
.S
pa
inT
urk
ey
Arg
en
tin
aM
exic
oS
love
nia
Ch
ina
Au
stri
aS
wit
zerl
an
dIn
do
ne
sia
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Graduation rates from upper secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary programmes designed to prepare students for tertiary-type A education
Entry rates into tertiary-type A education
Chart A2.2
%
Access to tertiary-type A education for upper secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary
graduates (2009)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart A2.2OK
140140
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Au
stra
liaPo
lan
dPo
rtu
ga
lN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
No
rwa
yIc
ela
nd
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
...
Ko
rea
Un
ite
d S
tate
sS
lova
k R
ep
ub
licFin
lan
dS
we
de
nN
eth
erl
an
ds
Slo
ve
nia
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mIs
rae
lO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eC
zech
Re
pu
blic
De
nm
ark
Au
stri
aH
un
ga
ryIr
ela
nd
G2
0 a
ve
rag
eIt
aly
Jap
an
Arg
en
tin
aC
hile
Sp
ain
Est
on
iaS
wit
zerl
an
dT
urk
ey
Ge
rma
ny
Me
xic
oB
elg
ium
Ind
on
esi
aC
hin
a
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2009 1995%
Chart C2.1
Entry rates into tertiary-type A education (2009 and 1995)
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C2.1 (type A, 1995-2009)OK
141141
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Entry rates into tertiary-type A: Impact of international students (2009)
Po
lan
d
Po
rtu
ga
l
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Ice
lan
d
No
rwa
y
Au
stra
lia
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Slo
ve
nia
Sw
ed
en
De
nm
ark
Hu
ng
ary
Ire
lan
d
Au
stri
a
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Est
on
ia
Me
xic
o
Ge
rma
ny
Sw
itze
rla
nd
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Adjusted (excluding international students)International students%
Chart C2.3
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart C2.3OK
142142
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
lic
Ice
lan
d
Po
lan
d
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
d
De
nm
ark
Au
stra
lia
Ire
lan
d
Fin
lan
d
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
No
rwa
y
Po
rtu
ga
l
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Sw
ed
en
OE
CD
ave
rag
e
Ca
na
da
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Isra
el
Hu
ng
ary
Ita
ly
Slo
ve
nia
Jap
an
Sp
ain
Au
stri
a
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Ge
rma
ny
Me
xic
o
Tu
rke
y
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
< 30-year-old women ≧ 30-year-old women Total women
<30-year-old men ≧ 30-year-old men Total men%
Chart A3.1
Tertiary-type A graduation rates in 2009, by gender (first-time graduation)
Percentage, by age group
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart A3.1 (change: women and men)OK
143143
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Fin
lan
dD
en
ma
rkIc
ela
nd
Sw
ed
en
Slo
ve
nia
Ne
w Z
ea
lan
dA
ust
ralia
Po
lan
dG
erm
an
yB
elg
ium
Ne
the
rla
nd
sK
ore
aN
orw
ay
Est
on
iaO
EC
D a
ve
rag
eC
an
ad
aA
rge
nti
na
Hu
ng
ary
Un
ite
d S
tate
sPo
rtu
ga
lA
ust
ria
Ch
ileS
wit
zerl
an
dC
zech
Re
pu
blic
Isra
el
Sp
ain
Ita
lyB
razi
lS
lova
k R
ep
ub
licFra
nce
Ire
lan
dU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Tu
rke
yM
exic
oIn
do
ne
sia
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2009 2002 1995
OECD average for countries with 1995, 2002 and 2009 dataChart C1.1
%
Enrolment rates of 20-29 year-olds (1995, 2002 and 2009)
Full-time and part-time students in public and private institutions
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart C1.1OK
144144
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Chart C1.2
Enrolment rates of 15-19 year-olds (1995, 2002 and 2009)
Full-time and part-time students in public and private institutions
Be
lgiu
mPo
lan
dIr
ela
nd
Slo
ve
nia
Hu
ng
ary
Ne
the
rla
nd
sC
zech
Re
pu
blic
Ge
rma
ny
Ko
rea
Sw
ed
en
Fin
lan
dN
orw
ay
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
licIc
ela
nd
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Est
on
iaPo
rtu
ga
lFra
nce
De
nm
ark
OE
CD
ave
rag
eIt
aly
Sp
ain
Ca
na
da
Un
ite
d S
tate
sN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Au
stra
liaA
ust
ria
Bra
zil
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
mC
hile
Arg
en
tin
aIs
rae
lIn
do
ne
sia
Tu
rke
yM
exic
o
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2009 2002 1995
OECD average for countries with 1995, 2002 and 2009 data
%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: Chart C1.2OK
145145
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Education and employment among young people (2009)
Distribution of 15-29 year-olds by education and work statusIc
ela
nd
Slo
ve
nia
De
nm
ark
Fin
lan
dN
eth
erl
an
ds
Lu
xe
mb
ou
rgG
erm
an
yS
we
de
nPo
lan
dH
un
ga
ryE
sto
nia
Be
lgiu
mC
zech
Re
pu
blic
Sw
itze
rla
nd
OE
CD
ave
rag
eU
nit
ed
Sta
tes
Slo
va
k R
ep
ub
licN
orw
ay
Ita
lyFra
nce
Au
stra
liaN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Au
stri
aG
ree
ceC
an
ad
aPo
rtu
ga
lIs
rae
lU
nit
ed
Kin
gd
om
Ire
lan
dS
pa
inB
razi
lM
exic
oT
urk
ey
0
20
40
60
80
100
Not in education, employedNot in education, inactiveNot in education, unemployedIn education
T C4.2a
%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C4.2 (table C4.2a)OK
146146
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Proportion of 15-29 year-olds unemployed in education and not in education, by duration of
unemployment (2009)
NorwayIceland
DenmarkIrelandFinlandAustria
Czech RepublicEstoniaMexicoCanadaFrance
IsraelBelgiumAustraliaGermany
ItalyOECD average
SwedenSloveniaGreece
SwitzerlandNetherlands
PolandNew Zealand
PortugalUnited Kingdom
United StatesTurkey
Spain
-5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
In education Unemployed more than 6 months Not in education Unemployed more than 6 monthsIn education Unemployed less than 6 months Not in education Unemployed less than 6 months
Chart C4.4
%
albiser_e
EAG 2011: chart C4.4OK
147147
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Other findings from previous edition
(EAG 2010)
Slides not updated as data not available in EAG 2011
156156
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Most tertiary graduates work in skilled occupationsProportion of 25-29 year-olds with tertiary degree working in semi-skilled or elementary occupations
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Year 2007 Year 2003%
EAG 2010Chart C3.5
albiser_e
EAG 2011: no updateEAG 2010: X C3.7 Few higher educated work below their skill level in their first labour market years. Less than a quarter works below the prosfessional level in 2007 (similar to 2003).
161161
13
Sep
tem
ber
2011
20
11 e
dit
ion o
f Ed
uca
tion a
t a G
lance
Freedom for parents to choose a public lower secondary school
Initial assignment
based on geographical area schools
Families are given a right
to enrol in any
traditional public school
Choice of other public schools is
restricted to the district or municipality
Choice of other public
school is restricted by
region
Families must apply to enrol
in a public school other than the one
assigned
There is free choice of other public schools if places are
availableAustria
Belgium
Chile Czech Republic
Denmark
England
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
ScotlandSlovak Republic
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United States
EAG 2010TD5.1
Yes
No
albiser_e
EAG 2011: no update
