EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

47
digitalto ols EDUC5101G for knowledge construction 5 th Adobe Connect Session Agenda: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 Welcome Check-in Final Paper Reminders Learning Theories and EdTech Break Out Activity 1 Break (7:30 – 7:45 pm EST) Instructional Design Models and Frameworks Using EdTech Break Out Activity 2 3 rd PBL Activity – Getting Started Check-out Next Session

Transcript of EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

Page 1: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

digitaltools

EDUC5101G

for knowledge construction5th Adobe Connect Session Agenda:Tuesday, March 8, 2016• Welcome• Check-in• Final Paper Reminders• Learning Theories and EdTech

• Break Out Activity 1• Break (7:30 – 7:45 pm EST)• Instructional Design Models and

Frameworks Using EdTech• Break Out Activity 2

• 3rd PBL Activity – Getting Started• Check-out• Next Session

Page 2: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

checkin

Page 3: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

finalpaperremindersImportant Dates:• Paper Due: Friday, March 18• Peer-Review Assignments Given: Sunday, March 21• Peer-Reviews Due: Friday, March 25• Responses to Peer Reviews Due: Friday, April 1

Requirements:• 6-8 pages (excluding references)• APA v6 formatting• Use the Final Paper Template• Review topic requirements on course website

Page 4: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)
Page 5: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)
Page 6: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

Task 1: Submit Your Paper

Task 2: Blind Peer-Review

finalpapernext steps

Page 7: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

finalpapernext steps

Page 8: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

finalpapernext steps

Page 9: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

Task 3: Respond to Feedback

finalpapernext steps

Page 10: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

finalpapernext steps

Sample of peer-review response tracking for a professional journal (Power, et al., in press)

Page 11: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

onlinepublishing

Page 12: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

learningtheories

& educational technology

Activity TheoryBehaviourismConnectivismConstructivismFlow TheoryTransactional Distance TheoryZone of Proximal Developmentothers… a

z2

Page 13: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

learningtheories

& educational technologyActivity Theory

a z2

Page 14: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

learningtheories

& educational technologyBehaviourism

a z2

Page 15: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

learningtheories

& educational technologyConnectivism

a z2

“The pipe is more important than the content within the pipe. Our ability to learn what we need tomorrow is more important that what we know today.”

George Siemens (2012)

Siemens, G. (2012) Connectivism and Learning Technologies. Available from http://www.slideshare.net/fastfonz/connectivism-final-draft

Page 16: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

learningtheories

& educational technologyConstructivism

a z2

Reading

Hearing Words

Seeing

Seeing & Hearing (movies, exhibits, performances)

Discussing

Simulating

Building or Doing the Real Thing

Passive Learning

Active (Constructive)

Learning

Page 17: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

learningtheories

& educational technologyFlow Theory

a z2

Page 18: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

learningtheories

& educational technologyTransactional Distance Theory

a z2peers

teacher

learner

content

Page 19: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

learningtheories

& educational technologyZone of Proximal Development

a z2

Page 20: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

flippedclasslearning theories and EdTech

activity

Activity Theory: Because Things Are Actors Toohttps://youtu.be/mb-3ufwK6U0

Connectivism: A New Theory for a Digital Agehttps://youtu.be/gyA7uGkZlY8

Use a Learning Theory: Constructivismhttps://youtu.be/Xa59prZC5gA

Zone of Proximal Developmenthttps://youtu.be/Du6vqSOj7UU

v1

Page 21: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

openingmindmup

Page 22: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

openingmindmup

Page 23: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

flippedclassabout flipped

classes

activity

Getting StartedOnce you have been assigned to a breakout room in Adobe Connect, click on the link provided to access your shared MindMup workspace

Group Instructions:• Watch the Video (can be opened directly from MindMup)• Choose a group recorder and reporter (can be the same person)• As a group, use MindMup to:

o Create a summary of the key pointso Describe how these key points affect educational technology choiceso Report your summaries to the class

Page 25: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

breaktime

Page 26: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

Theories?Models?

Frameworks?

What’s the difference?

Page 27: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

A model is “a simplified description… of a system

or process, to assist calculations and

predictions”

Oxford English Dictionary (2013)

Page 28: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

models [have] the ability to make predictions, and [allow] “analysts to test

specific parts of theories.”

Sherif (n.d.)

Page 29: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

a framework [is] a “structure and support

that may be used as both the launching point and the on-going guidelines”

for a research investigation or task

University of Southern California (n.d.)

Page 30: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

a framework is different from a model because it does not have predictive

capabilities

Sherif (n.d.); Power (2015)

Page 31: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

FRAMEKoole, M. L., (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training, 25-47. Edmonton, AB: AU Press. Retrieved from http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120155

Page 32: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

The CSAM FrameworkPower (2015). CSAM. http://robpower.weebly.com/csam.html

Page 33: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

ADDIE

Evaluate

Analyze

Design

Develop

Implement

ReviseRevise

Revise

Revise

Educational Technology (2014). The ADDIE Model: Instructional Design. http://educationaltechnology.net/the-addie-model-instructional-design/

Page 34: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

https://youtu.be/0vXegHDzrBg

Page 35: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

ASSUREEducational Technology (2015). ASSURE: Instructional Design Model. http://educationaltechnology.net/assure-instructional-design-model/

Page 36: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

The Kemp ModelEducational Technology (2016). Kemp Design Model. http://educationaltechnology.net/kemp-design-model/

Page 37: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

The ARCS ModelKeller (2013). ARCS Explained. http://www.arcsmodel.com Purdue University (2013). Identify student learning characteristics. http://www.arcsmodel.com

Page 38: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignmodels & frameworks

https://youtu.be/EteajgPEwRE

ARCS?

Page 39: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

instructionaldesignA teacher’s perspective on models & frameworks

https://youtu.be/syN_7t7ecVY

Page 40: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

breakoutactivityTime: 10 minutes

Which of the instructional design models discussed this evening:1. meets the definition of a model?2. meets the definition of a framework?3. seems like the easiest for you and your peers to use

when planning for educational technology integration?

NOTE – it’s okay if there are strong differences in opinion within your randomly assigned break out group, considering the range of personal and professional contexts! Feel free to explain why some of you chose a different model (or framework), if that is the case!

Useful Link:http://educationaltechnology.net/category/frameworks-and-theories/

Page 41: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

gettingstartedthird PBL activity

Now it’s time to get down to the business of preparing educators at your institution to effectively plan instruction that utilizes the new technology resources.

Congratulations! Your working group’s grant application (2nd PBL Activity) has been accepted, and you’ve received a grant to proceed with your educational technology integration project.

Designing for Technology Integration

Page 42: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

gettingstartedthird PBL activity

Your problem is that you (and your institution) want to make sure the educational technology is used effectively, and that lessons learned in your upcoming pilot project are used to improve learning experiences on an ongoing basis.

Page 43: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

gettingstartedthird PBL activity

Your working group needs to:

1. Select an instructional design model (or framework) that can be used to guide the instructional design process.

2. Explain to your peers why you chose that particular model (or framework), and why it is a better fit than other popular instructional design models (or frameworks).

3. Demonstrate how you will use that instructional design model (or framework) to guide the development and implementation of your pilot project.

NOTE – you do NOT need to produce an entire lesson plan… just demonstrate how the model (or framework) will guide your process from start to finish

Page 44: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

gettingstartedthird PBL activity

Your final project must include:

1. An online collaboration site for your working group where you:• Specify the scope of your problem, and project• Identify your knowledge and skills gaps that need to

be addressed in order to solve your problem• Share the tasks needed to propose a solution• Share (publish) your proposed solution

2. Present your problem and solution in an upcoming Adobe Connect session (20 minutes, including Q & A)

Page 45: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

moreresourcesVideos: Activity Theory: Because Things Are Actors Too. https://youtu.be/mb-3ufwK6U0

ADDIE Instructional Design Process. https://youtu.be/0vXegHDzrBg

ARCS: A Story of Motivational Design. https://youtu.be/EteajgPEwRE

Connectivism: A New Theory for a Digital Age. https://youtu.be/gyA7uGkZlY8

Instructional Design Models. https://youtu.be/syN_7t7ecVY

Instructional Design: The Models. https://youtu.be/RwBUsAJLiqY

MindMup 2.0 Quick Introduction. https://youtu.be/--v7ZfTHNJ8

Kemp’s Instructional Design Model. https://youtu.be/tj7g_Fcs5gs

Use a Learning Theory: Constructivism. https://youtu.be/Xa59prZC5gA

Zone of Proximal Development. https://youtu.be/Du6vqSOj7UU

Online Resources: Educational Technology (2014). The ADDIE Model: Instructional Design. http://educationaltechnology.net/the-addie-model-instructional-design/

Educational Technology (2015). ASSURE: Instructional Design Model. http://educationaltechnology.net/assure-instructional-design-model/

Educational Technology (2016). Kemp Design Model. http://educationaltechnology.net/kemp-design-model/

Keller (2013). ARCS Explained. http://www.arcsmodel.com

Koole, M. L., (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training, 25-47. Edmonton, AB: AU Press. Retrieved from http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120155

Power (2015). CSAM. http://robpower.weebly.com/csam.html

Purdue University (2013). Identify student learning characteristics. http://www.arcsmodel.com

Page 46: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

checkout

Page 47: EDUC5101G Session 5 Presentation (March 8, 2016)

nextsession

To Do List:• Weekly blog posts and responses

• Week 9 Post due by Sunday, March 13• Week 9 responses due by Friday, March 18

• Final Paper – Due Friday, March 18• Submit two (2) copies:

• Copy 1: Complete copy, including your name, UOIT ID, and preferred email address• Copy 2: Complete anonymized copy (excluding your name, UOIT ID, and contact

information)

• 3rd PBL Assignment – Due Tuesday, March 22• Work with your group to develop your online resources and presentation

Adobe Connect Session #6• Tuesday, March 22, 2016• Group PBL Presentations

• Designing Instruction with Technology