EdgeRyders - 'We, the People' session - 2012.06.15
8
CREATING THE SYMBIOTIC CITY: Bottom-up collaboration for the co-design of Civic Software Pedro Prieto Martín, Asoc. Ciudades Kyosei [email protected] Edgeryders Conference: ”we, the people” session Strasbourg, 2012.06.15
-
Upload
asociacion-kyopol-symbiotic-city -
Category
Documents
-
view
68 -
download
2
description
Presentation of the Asoc. Ciudades Kyosei in the "We, the People" session, in the EdgeRyders Conference, that took part in Strasbour, 2012.06.15
Transcript of EdgeRyders - 'We, the People' session - 2012.06.15
CREATING THE SYMBIOTIC CITY:Bottom-up collaboration for the
co-design of Civic Software
Pedro Prieto Martín, Asoc. Ciudades [email protected]
Edgeryders Conference: ”we, the people” sessionStrasbourg, 2012.06.15
About “Ciudades Kyosei” First Spanish NGO devoted to
(e)Participation, eDemocracy and eGovernance
• Officially established in 2006;
• Our research on (e)Participation started in 2004.
Areas of work:
• (e)Participation research and expertise
• (e)Participation advocacy, promotion and education
• Socio-technical design, construction and management of Civic Software systems
Our research has focused on:
• Civic Engagement
• Best design practices for (e)Participation systems
• Difficulties to promote innovation in the ICT for Governance field
Our main aim:
• The collaborative creation of Kyopol(aka. Symbiotic City)
Construction
Collaborative Evaluation
Pro
toty
pes
Minimal viable product
Feedback & improvement
ParticipatoryDesign
Sociopolitical Research
Research questions
ObjectivePrevious
knowledge
Socio-technical Experimentation
Technical research
Articulation of design objectives, visions and intuitions
AlphaPilot Projects
Permanent Beta
Beta
Theoretical analysis
Improvement and scaling
---> Done so far
Kyopol – Symbiotic CityA living project
BRAZIL GUATEMALA
SPAIN
Vicious Cycle of Participation
Intrinsic Problems· Complex· Expensive· Non-representative· Non-inclusive· Less informed· Conflict prone· Non-deliberative· Difficult to scale· ...
Extrinsic Problems· Arbitrary· Manipulability· Risk of capture· Irrelevant subjects· Non-effective· Not self-sustainable· Inefficient· Civic exhaustion· ...· Administrative Monopoly of participation
Motivation =
f (effort, usefulness)
Incompatibilities - Political - Legal - Cultural - Socioeconomic - Organizational
Participation =1/5 · Deliberation +
1/4 · Manipulation +
Rest · Politics as usual(Struggle for powerand accountability)
EU eParticipation =
Some lessons about participation
Change in expectations
Reduction in power and knowledge assimetries
Reduction cost of collective
action
Peer-to-peerrecognition
“Long Tail” models
CognitiveSurplus
Motivation =
f (effort, usefulness)
Virtuous Circle of (e)Participation
Vicious Cycle of Participation
Intrinsic Problems· Complex· Expensive· Non-representative· Non-inclusive· Less informed· Conflict prone· Non-deliberative· Difficult to scale· ...
Extrinsic Problems· Arbitrary· Manipulability· Risk of capture· Irrelevant subjects· Non-effective· Not self-sustainable· Inefficient· Civic exhaustion· ...· Administrative Monopoly of participation
Motivation =
f (effort, usefulness)
Incompatibilities - Political - Legal - Cultural - Socioeconomic - Organizational
Some lessons about participation
Pioneers Group
Collaborative Creation – Who?
Core Team
Communication
Public workers
Neighbor Assoc.
Kyopol ALPHA
Developers
Participative Methodologies 15M
Citizens
Politicians
AlcaláVillalbilla
Madrid
Pilot Projects Phase 1
MadridEuskadi
CataluñaSPAIN
ArgentinaVenezuela
Brasil
Phase 2 Phase 3
Expansion
PortugalUK
MéxicoItalyGermany
Kyopol BETA
?
Thank you very much for your mindful listening!!
More information athttp://www.ckyosei.org
Edgeryders Conference: ”we, the people” sessionStrasbourg, 2012.06.15
