Ecosystem Services in practice at a catchment level:
-
Upload
vance-pace -
Category
Documents
-
view
27 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Ecosystem Services in practice at a catchment level:
Ecosystem Services in practice at a catchment level:
a decade of integrated work on the Motueka River Catchment
Roger Young, Paul Gillespie Cawthron InstituteAndrew Fenemor, Chris Phillips, Garth Harmsworth Landcare Research
Will Allen Learning for SustainabilityMargaret Kilvington Independent Social Research
Why use a catchment scale?
•Natural geographical and hydrological unit•Flows and stocks of water, sediment and contaminants are contained within catchment boundaries•Regional governance largely reflects these boundaries
Simple systems
• Call for generic solutions (or recipes) that work every time and don’t require new skills or infrastructure
Complicated systems
• Require a high level of skills and coordination, formulae are necessary, and there is a high degree of certainty in the outcome
Complex systems
• Every situation is unique, uncertainty of outcome remains, expertise can help but isn’t sufficient, quality of relationships are crucial
ICM – a new approach?
•Managing multiple issues in an integrated way•Ridge tops to the sea•Economic benefit while maintaining environmental, social and cultural values•Working with communities
Why Motueka?
•Microcosm of NZ•Land use intensification•Increasing demand for water•Demand for sea space•Multiple interests
•Not broken yet
An Ecosystem Services approach?
“ICM offers a way of addressing and understanding the cumulative effects on the environment of all activities within a catchment. An integrated framework is required to ensure that individual redesign efforts cumulatively lead to the maintenance of natural capital…. and recognising that some activities may not be appropriate for the sensitivity of the surrounding environment.” (PCE 2004).
•Systems approach•Working across interfaces•Social process builds common understanding•Common metrics for managing the environment
Ecosystem Services at a Catchment Scale
Disturbance regulationWater regulation and supply
Erosion controlNutrient cycling
Waste treatmentRefugia/Habitat
Food productionRaw materials
RecreationCultural
11 of 17 ES’s mentioned in Costanza et al. (1997)
Ecosystem Services at a Catchment Scale
Disturbance regulationWater regulation and supply
Erosion controlNutrient cycling
Waste treatmentRefugia/Habitat
Food productionRaw materials
RecreationCultural
Ecosystem Services at a Catchment Scale
Disturbance regulationWater regulation and supply
Erosion controlNutrient cycling
Waste treatmentRefugia/Habitat
Food productionRaw materials
RecreationCultural
Water regulation and supply
•Up to 25% of river flow from Groundwater •Groundwater inputs affect water temp in gaining reaches•Temperature has strong effects on habitat suitability
River and Groundwater should be managed together
Olsen & Young (2009) Hydrogeology Journal 17: 175-183
Water regulation and supply
•Environmental flow setting•Instream habitat modelling
Minimum flow and allocation limit recommendations
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Flow (m3s-1)
Su
itab
le a
rea
(m2 )
Flow = 4 m3/s
Young & Thomas (2006) Report to TDC Resource Management Policy Committee.
Nutrient cycling
Gillespie et al (in press) NZ Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
•Catchment loads modelled•Denitrification estimated•N Inputs ~40% of assimilation capacity•Eutrophication unlikely•Nutrients probably having beneficial effects on productivity•But there still could be some effect on harmful algal bloom intensity
Nutrient management not currently critical for the whole Bay, but could be site-specific effects
173 173.1 173.2
9-10 May 2001
41.15
41.05
40.95
40.85
40.75Silicon
Nutrient cycling/Waste treatment
1 to 2 km 6 km(AMA) + -
Cornelisen et al (in press) NZ Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
Cultural• Cultural health indicators• Incorporate a Māori perspective of rivers/streams• Use of mātauranga Māori (knowledge)• Identifies issues and change from Māori viewpoint • Links Māori wellbeing and river/stream health• Reporting, planning and policy
He Oranga mo nga Uri Tuku Iho trust
IndicatorsTangaroa • Water Clarity• Water Flow• Water Quality• Shape and form of river,
riverbank condition, sediment• Insects• Fish
Tāne Mahuta• Riparian vegetation• Catchment vegetation• Bird life (species)• Ngahere/Taonga• Pests
Haumia tiketike• Mahinga kai• Rongoa
Tūmatauenga• Human activity, Use of river• Access • Cultural sites
Tāwhirimātea• Smell
• Links between science and cultural indicators• Some strong correlations, some weak• Strong correlation between cultural health and % of
catchment area in natural cover
Science/cultural monitoring together give a rich, full picture of the environment
Cultural indicators potentially useful for ecosystem services assessment
Harmsworth et al (in press) NZ Journal of Marine & Freshwater Research.
Ecosystem Services as a dialogue tool
• No one group/community/agency has all the answers
• Need to bring people together to share information
• Ecosystem services – fluid definition• Starting point for conversation• Shared interest but not yet a fixed view
Ecosystem Services as a dialogue tool
• Other examples• AGM’s• Online discussion group• Sediment learning group• Community reference group• Watershed talk
Kilvington et al. A & B (in press) NZ Journal of Marine & Freshwater Research.Allen et al. (in press) NZ Journal of Marine & Freshwater Research.
Conclusions
•Many ecosystem services are apparent at the catchment scale•ICM – strong similarities to ecosystem services approach
•Systems approach•Working across interfaces•Social process builds common understanding•Common metrics for managing the environment
•Managing the interactions among ecosystem services a key challenge
•Examples of ecosystem services thinking
•Ecosystem services as a platform for dialogue
More info…
•http://icm.landcareresearch.co.nz
•Special issue of the New Zealand Journal of Marine & Freshwater Research on Integrated Catchment Management
•Due out next month•16 papers