Economic Solutions to Environmental Problems: The Market Approach
description
Transcript of Economic Solutions to Environmental Problems: The Market Approach
Economic Solutions to Environmental Problems:
The Market Approach
Chapter 5
Overview• Market approach refers to incentive-based
policy that encourages conservative practices or pollution reduction strategies
• Types of Market Instruments– Pollution charges– Subsidies– Deposit/refund systems– Pollution permit trading systems
2
1. Pollution Charges
• Fees based on “Polluter-Pays Principle (polluter should bear costs of control measures)”
• Types of pollution charges –Product charge–Emission/Effluent charge
3
(1) Product Charge
• A fee added to price of pollution-generating ___________, which generates negative externality
• Impose product charge as per unit tax on product, e.g., gas tax–If the tax equals the marginal external
cost (MEC) at QE, it is called a _________ _____
–How does the tax on gasoline in the US compare with that of other nations?
4
Selected International Gasoline Tax Rates
Nation Tax Rate % of Price (2008)
United States 18.5
U.K. 67.8
France 67.4
Germany 70.3
Japan 45.8
Spain 56.0
5Source: International Energy Agency, November, 2008
Modeling a Pigouvian Tax
6
$
Q of gasoline
MPB = MSB
MPC
MSC = MPC + MEC
0 QE QC
MPCt
b
a
Amount of tax
7
Making sellers pay a tax on each unit they sell is equivalent to an increase in the cost of producing each unit. Anything that increases production costs causes the S curve to shift up: in order for sellers to be willing to supply the same quantity as before, they must receive a higher price to compensate them for the increase in their costs.
8
By setting the unit tax equal to the MEC at QE, the MPC curve shifts up to MPCt. Equilibrium output is then determined by MPCt and MSB, which is QE.
Assessing the Model
• In theory, achieves an efficient outcome• In practice, difficult to identify the value of
MEC at QE
• Allows only for an output reduction to reduce pollution
9
(2) Emission/Effluent Charge
• A fee imposed directly on the discharge of _____________
• Typically implemented through a tax
10
Model: Single Polluter Case
• Government sets an abatement standard at AST
• A0 is actual abatement level.
• Policy options to polluter are:–Abate up to AST and incur those costs, or
–Pay a constant per unit tax, t (also called marginal tax, MT), on any abatement less than AST
11
Modeling Emission ChargeSingle Polluter
12
$
Abatement (A)0
MAC
MTt
A0AST
a b
c
Firm abates up to A0 sinceMAC < MT; firm pays tax between A0 and AST, sinceMAC > MT
Pollution Charges in Practice• Internationally, the pollution charge is the most
commonly used market-based instrument– Australia, Bulgaria, France, and Japan, use fees
or taxes to control noise pollution generated by aircraft
– France, Mexico, and Poland are among the nations using effluent charges to protect water resources.
– Others levy charges on products such as batteries, tires, lubricant oil, packaging, paint, paint containers, and gasoline
13
2. Environmental Subsidies
• Two major types of subsidies:– Abatement equipment subsidies– Pollution reduction subsidies
14
(1) Abatement Equipment Subsidy
• A payment aimed at lowering the cost of abatement technology
• Goal is to internalize the positive externality associated with the consumption of abatement activities
• If the subsidy equals the marginal external benefit (MEB) at QE, it achieves an efficient equilibrium and is called a __________________
15
Pigouvian SubsidyMarket for Scrubbers
16
($ millions)MSC
MPB
MSB
0 QC = 200 QE = 210
PC = 170
PE = 175 Subsidy = $14 million
MPBS
Q of scrubbers
PE – s = 161
K
L
• In a competitive market, too few scrubbers are exchanged at too low a price because the MEB of a cleaner environment are not recognized by the market participants.
17
(2) Pollution Reduction Subsidy
• To implement, government pays the polluter a subsidy (s) for every unit of pollution abated below some pre-established level ZST
• Per unit subsidy = s, total subsidy = s(ZST - ZO), where ZO is the actual level of pollution
– Analogous to an emission charge
18
Subsidies in Practice• Environmental subsidies typically are
implemented as grants, low-interest loans, tax credits or exemptions, and rebates
• Many countries around the world use these instruments, including Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Japan, and Turkey
• In the U.S., common uses include federal funding to build publicly-owned treatment works and subsidies to encourage the development of cleaner fuels and low-emission vehicles
19
3. Deposit/Refund Systems
• A market instrument that imposes an up-front charge to pay for potential damages and refunds it for returning a product for proper disposal or recycling
• The deposit is intended to capture the MEC of improper waste disposal (IW) in advance
20
Modeling Deposit/Refund System improper waste (IW) disposal market
• MECIW: health damages + aesthetic impairment from litter, trash accumulation, etc.
• MPCIW: costs to disposer (e.g., trash receptacles, collection fees, plus forgone revenue from not recycling)
• MSCIW = MPCIW + MECIW
• MPBIW: demand for improper disposal
Assume MEBIW = 0, so MPBIW = MSBIW
21
Deposit-Refund Model
$
Improper Waste Disposal (%)
MPBIW = MSBIW
MPCIW
MSCIW
0
QE QIW
MPCIW + Deposit
b
a
Deposit=MEC at QE
100Proper Waste Disposal (%) 0100
Deposit converts % of overall waste disposal, measured by (QIW - QE), from improper methods to proper
22
Assessing the Model
• Promotes responsible behavior• Requires minimal supervision by
government• Can help slow the use of virgin raw
materials by improving availability of recycled materials
23
Deposit/Refund Systems in Practice
• Deposit/refund systems are used worldwide– Many nations use these systems to
encourage proper disposal of beverage containers: in the U.S., 11 states have bottle bills
• Other applications include systems used to promote responsible disposal of used tires, car hulks, and lead-acid batteries
24
4. Pollution Permit Trading Systems• A pollution permit trading system establishes a
market for rights to pollute by issuing _________ pollution credits or allowances– Credits are issued for emitting below a standard– Allowances indicate how much can be released
• Two components of the system are1. Fixed number of permits is issued based on an
“acceptable” level of pollution set by government
2. The permits are marketable
25
How Permit Trading Works
• There is an incentive to trade as long as polluters face different ________ levels
• Suppose a firm has 50 permits but normally emits 75 units of SO2. What must it do?– Answer
• Abate 25 units of emissions, OR• Buy 25 permits from another producer
• Which option will the firm choose?– Answer
• Whichever option is cheaper
26
Result• Low-cost abaters will clean up pollution and sell
excess permits to other firms– They will _____ at any P _____ than their MAC
• High-cost abaters will buy permits rather than abate– They will _____ at any P _____ than their MAC
• Trading will continue until the incentive to do so no longer exists, at which point, the cost-effective solution is obtained, i.e., the MACs across firms are _________
27
An Example (Ch4—slide 20)
Polluter 1: TAC1 = 1.25(A1)2
MAC1 = 2.5(A1)• where A1 is pollution abated by Polluter 1
Polluter 2: TAC2 = 0.3125(A2)2
MAC2 = 0.625(A2) • where A2 is pollution abated by Polluter 2
28
Round 1: Government issues 5 permits to each polluter
Polluter 1: Current pollution level: 10 units # of permit held: 5 abatement required: 5MAC1 = 2.5(A1)=2.5( __ )= $12.50TAC1 = 1.25(A1)2=1.25( __) 2= $31.25
Polluter 2: Current pollution level: 10 units # of permit held: 5 abatement required: 5MAC2 = 0.625(A2)=0.625( ___)= $3.125TAC2 = 0.3125(A2)2=0.3125( ___) 2= $7.81
29
Round 2: Polluter 1 purchases 1 permit ($8.00) from polluter 2
Polluter 1: Current pollution level: 10 units # of permit held: 6 abatement required: 4MAC1 = 2.5(A1)=2.5( ___)= $10.00TAC1 = 1.25(A1)2=1.25(___) 2= $20.00 (cost of 1 permit purchased=$8.00)
Polluter 2: Current pollution level: 10 units # of permit held: 4 abatement required: 6MAC2 = 0.625(A2)=0.625(___)= $3.75TAC2 = 0.3125(A2)2=0.3125(___) 2= $11.25 (revenue from 1 permit sold=$8.00)
30
Final round: Polluter 1 purchases 3 permits ($8; $7; $5) from polluter 2; MAC1 = MAC2
Polluter 1: Current pollution level: 10 units # of permit held: 8 abatement required: 2MAC1 = 2.5(A1)=2.5(___)= $5.00TAC1 = 1.25(A1)2=1.25(___) 2= $5.00 (cost of 3 permits purchased=$8+$7+$5=$20.00)
Polluter 2: Current pollution level: 10 units # of permit held: 2 abatement required: 8MAC2 = 0.625(A2)=0.625(___)= $5.00TAC2 = 0.3125(A2)2=0.3125(___) 2= $20.00 (revenue from 3 permits sold =$8+$7+$5=$20.00) 31
Assessing the Model
• Trading establishes the price of a right to pollute without government trying to “search” for a price
• Trading system is flexible –Note that an emissions standard can be
adjusted by changing the number of permits issued
• Cost-effective solution is obtained32
33
Pollution Trading Systems in Practice• Most of the evolution of trading is occurring in U.S.
– An important example is the allowance-based trading program to control sulfur dioxide emissions under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
– More innovation has occurred at state and local levels• Ozone Transport Commission in the Northeast• California Regional Clean Air Incentives Market
(RECLAIM)• Key international example
– Trading of greenhouse gas allowances are part of the Kyoto Protocol, an international accord aimed at global warming
• Includes the European Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading System (EU ETS), launched in 2005
34
Positive Externalities from Education• A more educated population benefits society:
– lower crime rates: educated people have more opportunities, so less likely to rob and steal
– better government: educated people make better-informed voters
• People do not consider these external benefits when deciding how much education to “purchase”
• Result: market eq’m quantity of education—too low
• How govt may improve the market outcome:– subsidize cost of education
35
Other Examples of Positive Externalities
• Being vaccinated against contagious diseases protects not only you, but people who visit the salad bar or produce section after you.
Thank you for not contaminating the fruit supply!
36
Positive Externalities
• In the presence of a positive externality, the social value of a good includes–private value – the direct value to
buyers–external benefit – the value of the
positive impact on bystanders
37
AA CC TT II VV E LE L EE AA RR NN II NN G G 11: : Analysis of a positive externalityAnalysis of a positive externality
The market for flu shots
D
S
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 10 20 30
P
Q
$External benefit
= $10/shot• Draw the social
value curve.• Find the socially
optimal Q. • What policy would
internalize this externality?
38
AA CC TT II VV E LE L EE AA RR NN II NN G G 11: : AnswersAnswers
Socially optimal Q = ___ shotsTo internalize the externality, use _______ = $10/shot.
39
The market for flu shots
D
S
Social value = private value + external benefit
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 10 20 30
P
Q
$external benefit
25
If negative externality market produces a larger quantity
than is socially desirableIf positive externality market produces a smaller quantity
than is socially desirableTo remedy the problem, “internalize the externality” tax goods with negative externalities subsidize goods with positive externalities
If negative externality market produces a larger quantity
than is socially desirableIf positive externality market produces a smaller quantity
than is socially desirableTo remedy the problem, “internalize the externality” tax goods with negative externalities subsidize goods with positive externalities
Effects of Externalities: Effects of Externalities: SummarySummary
40
Consumption externalities Production externalities
Positive Negative Positive Negative
The benefits to the rest of society of people being vaccinated before traveling abroad
Noise pollution from using car stereos
The benefits to the environment that arise from the planting of woodland by a forestry company
Wastes being dumped into a river by a company
41