Economic benefits of the TFA, implementation status, and private … · 2016-10-11 · Increased...
Transcript of Economic benefits of the TFA, implementation status, and private … · 2016-10-11 · Increased...
Economic benefits of the TFA, implementation status, and private sector involvement
FIATA World Congress, 5 October, 2016
Ezequiel M. Guicovsky Lizarraga Senior Officer, Business Development Trade Facilitation and Policy for Business Division of Business and Institutional Support
Key topics addressed
TFA impact on trade costs, trade flows and GDP
growth
TFA impact on export diversification
TFA impact on revenue collection
TFA impact on SMEs and consumers
Status of implementation in the Americas
Key measures
Role of the Private sector in implementation
Most studies estimate that implementation of the TFA will lead to export and GDP growth…
3
Export growth
GDP growth
WTO ICC OECD Other1
+750 to 1,000 billions $
+0.35 to 0.55 % growth
1,000 billions $
+960 billions $
+40 billions $
+0.50 % growth
1,000 to 1,500 billions $ NA
1.Ferrantino and Tsigas (2013), Hufbauer and Schott (2013); World Trade Report 2015
Implementation of the TFA will reduce trade costs in all regions
4
11%
12%
14%
14%
14%
16%
17%
North America
Europe
Asia
Middle East
Commonwealth
LAC
Africa
Estimated reductions in ad valorem tariff equivalent trade costs due to TFA implementation (%)
Source: WTO Secretariat calculations, WTO World Trade Report 2015
And for countries at all development stages, with a premium for LDCs
5
11%
13%
15%
17%
Developed
G-20 developing
Other developing
Least-developed
Estimated reductions in ad valorem tariff equivalent trade costs due to FTA implementation by level of development (%)
…for developed as well as developing countries in all possible scenarios
6
10%
7%
9%
13%
10%
9%
11%
13%
10%
12%
20%
35%
Developed
G-20 developing
Other developing
Least-developed
FullLiberalConservative
Estimated increase in export under various TFA scenarios by level of development (billions $ increase)
WTO Secretariat calculations, WTO World Trade Report 2015
Trade facilitation has a larger effect than removing tariffs
7
TF reforms could increase GDP up to 6x more than removing tariffs
2.6
1.5
0.4
AmbitiousTF scenario
Modest TFscenario
Tariffsremoval
Increase in GDP (trillion US$, %)
x6
x4
4.7% 2.6%
0.7%
1.6
1 1.1
AmbitiousTF scenario
Modest TFscenario
Tariffsremoval
Increase in trade (trillion US$, %)
+40%
14.5%
9.4% 10.1%
TF reforms could increase trade up to 40% more than removing tariffs
Source: Enabling Trade Report 2013, World Economic Forum
Intra-Regional Trade, Total Exports, Exports to USA and Canada
Exports Intra-
Regional
Total Exports to the World
Reported figures from ITC Trade Map – Case Latin-America
In 2013: 229 billion U$ 229,255,694,000 U$ In 2014: 202 billion U$ 202,338,115,000 U$
In 2013: 1117 billion U$ (1,117,096,784,000 U$) In 2014: 1082 billion U$ (1,082,508,912,000 U$)
Total Exports to
Canada
In 2013: 22.9 billion U$ (22,995,056,000 U$) In 2014: 22.8 billion U$ (22,899,783,000 U$)
Total Exports to
USA
In 2013: 411,5 billion U$ (411,592,411,000 U$) In 2014: 457,4 billion U$ (457,459,988,000 U$)
Impact by Measure
9
Full implementation scenario:
• 14.1% of total costs for low income countries,
• 15.1% for lower middle income countries, and
• 12.9% for upper middle income countries.
Limited scenario: LICs the potential trade cost
reduction reaches 11.7%
Potential impact of the TFA according to the OECD
Examples my group of measures: - 2.4% for (h) enhancement of procedures, - 1.9% for (g) Automation, and - 1.2% for (c) Advance rulings
Most studies estimate that implementation of the TFA will lead to export and GDP growth…
What are the costs of cross-border inefficiencies?
11
…20 lowest performing countries1? • e.g. Kenya, Brazil, Sudan…
…20 best performing countries? • e.g. Singapore, Malaysia, Israel…
Cost to Import ($)
Cost to Export ($)
Trade Cost Quiz: how much does it cost to import and export a 20 foot container from…
? ?
? ?
Cost to complete every official procedure in the country (excl. international transport) • Exports: from packing the goods into the container at the warehouse to their departure from
the port of exit (duties and taxes are excluded) • Imports: from the vessel’s arrival at the port of entry to the cargo’s delivery at the
warehouse (duties and taxes are excluded)
1. Excluding landlocked countries 2. Source: Doing Business 2015
2,900$ 2,300$
610$ 580$
x5 x4
Border inefficiencies translate into direct and indirect costs
Direct costs
Time and resources invested in managing export administrative activities • Collect, produce, transmit and process required information and documents
Indirect costs
Increased operational costs • Delays translate into extra transport, insurance or warehouse costs
Increased working capital requirements • Inventories immobilized are carried out by the exporter (except for EXW sales)
Product deterioration • Delays can lead to the degradation of products and render them unfit for sale
Lost business opportunities • Direct: joining a punctual regional trade • Indirect: immobilized stock could have been sold to a local client
Cross-border procedures identified as key barriers to trade in the Caribbean
Top barriers to trade – Case in the Caribbean
Rules of origin requirements abroadInappropriate telecommunications infrastructure
Technical requirements and standards abroadCrime and theft
Domestic technical requirements and standardsCost / delays caused by domestic transportation
Inappropriate production technology and skillsDifficulties in meeting quality/quantity requirements
Cost / delays caused by international transportationIdentifying potential markets and buyers
Access to trade financeAccess to imported inputs at competitive prices
Corruption at the borderTariffs
Burdensome import procedures
Source: WEF Enabling trade report, 2015
SME are particularly vulnerable to these additional costs
On a relative basis, SME dedicate more HR to export/import than large business
Intermediate financing required to cover working capital and inventory needs is very expensive SMEs often export small volumes of low value-added product making it harder to reach the “breakeven” point
!
!
!
TFA promotes SMEs exports as they are particularly vulnerable to border inefficiencies
SMEs cannot afford quality logistics service providers who could speed up the border crossing process SME are often classified as “High risk” operators by border agencies…
…and they rarely can join “ Authorized Economic Operator” scheme
!
!
!
Time to export
COUNTING THE TIME AND COST TO EXPORT
Cost to export
0 50 100 150 200 250
OECD high income
Europe & Central Asia
East Asia & Pacific
South Asia
Middle East & North Africa
Latin America & Caribbean
Sub-Saharan Africa
Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
OECD high income
Europe & Central Asia
South Asia
East Asia & Pacific
Latin America & Caribbean
Middle East & North Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa
Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Time to import
COUNTING THE COST TO IMPORT
Cost to import
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
OECD high income
Europe & Central Asia
East Asia & Pacific
Latin America & Caribbean
South Asia
Middle East & North Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa
Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)
0 200 400 600 800 10001200
OECD high income
Europe & Central Asia
East Asia & Pacific
Latin America & Caribbean
Middle East & North Africa
South Asia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Logistics costs are comparatively high in LAC and average 25% of product value
18
1. Source: UNECA 2004
Logistics cost as % of total product value by regional groupings
8.5% 9.0% 9.5%
18.0%
23.0% 26.0% 27.0%
32.0%
Singapore OECD USA Chile Colombia Brazil Argentina Peru
Each day saved in shipping time is worth 1% of product value1 • Time delays reduce trade flows more significantly than trade tariffs
TIME IS MONEY...IN PARTICULAR FOR GVCs
Lack of predictability increases businesses operational costs E.g. need for larger inventory to mitigate supply chain risks
Time-sensitive products are even more affected by delays Perishable: risks of product deterioration Just-in-time: high inventory costs and lost business opportunities
1 For manufactured products
Export diversification
Border inefficiencies limit business ability to integrate into global value chain
21
Economy is characterized by global value chains
Inefficient cross-border procedures impact business competitiveness
Production processes are being increasingly fragmented • Ex. Barbie doll is produced in 5
different countries (Japan, Germany, Korea, USA and China)
30% of world trade is realized between subsidiaries of multinational companies
30% to 60% of G20 exports are intermediate products
Companies need to import and export efficiently and at minimal cost to be able to integrate successfully in global value chain Every day saved in the shipment process translate into 0.8% ad-valorem cost reduction1
Doing Business figures are a key decision criteria for MNC investments abroad • Ex. fertilizer blending unit in Western
Africa
1. For manufactured products
TFA implementation leads to diversification of exported products and export destinations
22
10%
12%
20%
36%
Developed
G-20developing
Otherdeveloping
Least-developed
Increases in # of products by destination (% change)
Increases in # of destinations by product (% change)
19%
19%
33%
59%
Developed
G-20developing
Otherdeveloping
Least-developed
Source: WTO Secretariat calculations, WTO World Trade Report 2015
TRADE COSTS ARE A KEY DECISION CRITERION USED BY MNCs WHEN RELOCATING IN GVCs
3%
3%
3%
5%
5%
6%
6%
9%
9%
25%
25%
28%
29%
36%
50%
Security concerns
Ownership restrictions
Labour practices
Visa requirements
Meeting deadlines
Access to finance
Labour skills
Inadequate ICT networks
Power supply
Import duties
Meeting standards
Business environment
Licensing requirements
Customs procedures
Transport costs &…
Private view on the main barriers in connecting firms to value chains (% answers)
Source: OECD/WTO Questionnaire 2013
THE TFA WOULD NOT ADDRESS ALL YOUR PROBLEMS
The TFA has not been concluded to do the following:
It will not improve the logistics infrastructure
It does not address commercial, financial and logistics
procedures
It does not address too stringent trade regulations
The TFA will reduce the time and cost for collecting, submitting and processing the information and documentation associated with cross-border transactions
1
2
3
SUMMARIZING: WHAT THE TFA EXPECTS TO ACHIEVE…
Impact on international
trade
50% reduction in trade delays 15% reduction in trade costs 1 trillion US$ increase in merchandise exports per
annum 15% increase in # of product by destination 20% increase in # of destination by product
Impact on the business
environment
500 billions US$ GDP growth
Attracting more foreign direct investment
Greater participation of SMEs in trade
Reduction in trade-related corruption
Better collection of government revenues
TFA could bring benefits to the poorest
Trade costs are passed on to final consumers
In LDCs households rely strongly on imports to satisfy their basic needs • Trade cost reduction could
directly impact their purchasing power
Perishable goods are the main export product of the poorest
By reducing cross-border delays, the TFA could allow rural communities to export their products more easily
Revenue collection
Implementation of the TFA increases government revenue in 3 ways
28
Trade Flows
Compliance
Fraud and corruption
TFA reforms have a potential to increase trade flows and as a result, increase the tax base and revenue collection
By simplifying procedures, TFA reforms encourage compliance, reduce informal trade and increase likelihood of duties being paid
TFA reforms should improve revenue collection by better detection of customs fraud and corruption
Border inefficiencies lead to revenue losses
1. Moise and Sorescu 2013, OECD
Understatement of customs value • Notably due to weak detection mechanisms and insufficient sanctions • In Cambodia, comparison between ship manifest and declaration
suggest that only 25% of the goods shipped are declared to customs
Smuggling of goods • Because of the complexity of formalities, it becomes financially rewarding
to evade customs • e.g. In Georgia in 2000, “shadow” imports accounted from 30% to 70% of
domestic demand
Diversion of revenues • Into pockets of corrupt officials
Studies suggest that inefficient border procedures lead to revenue losses = 5% of GDP1
Case studies
30
Case
• Improve customs legislation & practices • Train customs officials • Improve customs controls
2002 - 2003 revenues increased
by 158%
Reforms Impact
• Reform and improvements in customs administration
2006 - 2010 revenues increased
by 51%
• Improve automation systems and best practices in line with international standards
1990 - 1992 revenue increased
by 105%
Intra-Regional Trade and opportunities in the TFA
31
Intra-Regional Trade
2%
4%
5%
8%
9%
11%
13%
18%
20%
50%
52%
63%
CEMAC
COMESA
CARICOM
SADC
MIDDLE EAST
UEMOA
EAC
AFRICA
LATINAMERICA
NORTH AMERICA
ASIA
WESTERN EUROPE
Percentage of Intra-regional Trade per Region
Sources: UN AfricaRenewal Online: http://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/august-2014/intra-africa-trade-going-beyond-political-commitments Regional Integration in ACP countries by ODI (Overseas Development Institute, UK) supported by European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/development/icenter/repository/Regional-Integration-Report-18-09-2008_en.pdf Establishing CARICOM’s Real Natural Trading Partner, CCMF-UWI: http://www.ccmf-uwi.org/files/publications/conference/2010/8_3-Hosein_Khadan-p.pdf WTO International Trade Statistics 2015
Who’s guilty?
Governments…
“Yes, we need to think regional, but what can we do, when we are unable to get our goods even to the domestic market due to procedural and infrastructure bottlenecks : going beyond borders in a non-starter’
Private sector representative
Businesses…
“The private sector is not thinking regional, it bask in the comfort of supplying domestic markets only, they fear competition from across the border and vested interests in particular stoke these fears’
Government representative
according to governments…
according to businesses…
2 key success factors needed to go forward 34
Business logic must be at the heart of regional integration projects
• Regional integration projects are initiated at the political level but they require a buy in from the private sector to be achieved
• Intra regional trade will intensify only if it makes sense economically for the businesses
Coordination between governments and private sector must be strengthened
• Ensure adhesion of the businesses to the regional integration processes through awareness raising
• Common identification of barriers to trade and the required solutions to remedy it and boost commercial trade flows within the region
1
2
Regional approach to implementation will maximize the benefits of the TFA
35
Authority for rule making has often been transferred to the community level • Areas where regional statutory framework and policies are directly affected:
regional intervention should come before national legislation • Example: UEMOA customs code
There is a need for harmonization of practices and regulations • Insufficiently coordinated national interventions can translate into disruptive and
counterproductive practices ; e.g. internet publications, border agency coordination
Economy of scales and sharing of resources can be achieved • e.g. establishment of temperature controlled warehouses for perishable goods
Only synchronized reforms allow businesses to fully benefit from the TFA • Overall supply chain performance = performance of the weakest link
3 levels of regional intervention should be considered
Regional harmonization • RIO provides guidelines for the implementation of TFA measures but
the country decide on an individual basis on the sequencing and timing of implementation
Regional Implementation • RIO takes charge over the implementation of selected measure on
behalf of its Member States (e.g. internet publication, enquiry points, border agency coordination)
Regional Coordination • RIO provides guidelines and ensures that implementation is
synchronized over the region to ensure maximum benefits for the traders
Implementation status
37
TFA status of implementation in the Americas Status of ratifications
TFA status of implementation in the Americas Status of Notification of measures Category A
Changing the mindset
Facilitation vs. control
Client vs. partners
Ambitious implementation vs. Legal compliance
Collaborative approach vs. Turf issues
These inefficiencies can be traced back to several key root causes:
CAUSES OF CROSS BORDER INEFFICIENCY
A control versus a facilitation mindset
Formalities are outdated and have not been reviewed for many years
There are vested interests in upholding unnecessary procedures
Lack of coordination between cross border agencies
Lack of automation and the use of ICT
The WTO defines Trade Facilitation as:
PROCEDURAL OBSTACLES VS. REGULATORY OBSTACLES
75% of obstacles identified in cross
border inefficiencies are linked to the
procedural requirements of meeting the
regulation rather than the stringency of
the regulation itself
ITC, NTM Studies
“
”
Going forward with implementation
Prepare implementation
Institute public-private
dialogue
Ensure strong Inter-agency coordination
Thoroughly structure TFA implementation roadmap • Conduct national assessment on compliance status with TFA obligations • Identify priority reforms and categorize TFA commitments • Identify potential donors and implementation partners
Involve private sector in finalizing the prioritization of the TFA commitment implementation • Businesses are the main service users, and as such are best suited to
point the main barriers to trade
Involve border regulatory agency for fine tuning the implementation of measures countries are partially compliant with • As well as in the prioritization of category commitments
National Trade Facilitation Committee could be the appropriate body to carry out these objectives
Private sector is at the core of border regulatory agencies missions
Pays duties and taxes
Transport goods
Duty and Taxes Collection
Trade Facilitation
Control of flows of goods
Fiscal Economical
Fraud protection Security
Protect national interests
Private Sector
Invest, import and export
Actors and victims of frauds
Businesses are the main users/clients of the border regulatory agencies and they should be involved in their reforms
• Trade policy reforms directly impact the business environment
• Negotiators and policy makers are better informed on the business interests and needs
• Businesses are in the best position to identify reforms opportunities and implementation strategies
• When businesses are involved in the policy making they are more likely to comply with the new rules
Why is public-private dialogue important in the context of the trade policy making reforms
What is public-private
dialogue ?
• Structured mechanisms aimed at facilitating the reform process by involving a balanced range of public and private sector actors
• Institutionalized tools to identify, filter, accelerate, implement, and measure policy reforms
Why is it so important?
Public-private dialogue must be leveraged at each stop of policy making process
Source: International Finance Cooperation
Diagnostic Solution Design Implementation
Monitoring and
evaluation
•Engagement •Definition •Empowerment
•Consensus building •Filtering
•Ongoing support •Watchdog •Resources
•Watchdog •Feedback loop
Structured dialogue Workable reforms Reforms that work
PPD contributes to all steps of reform process
3 provisions of the TFA specifically provide for strengthen PPD
Art. 2.1
Art. 2.2
Art. 23.2
Opportunity to Comment and Information before Entry into Force
Consultations
National Committee on Trade Facilitation
Opportunity to comment, information before entry into force and consultations
Measure description
Provide traders and other interested parties1 the opportunity and sufficient delay to comment changes to new or amended trade-related regulations2
Publish or make publicly available new or amended trade-related laws or regulations (or information about it) as early as possible before entry into force
1. Potentially includes foreign traders / stakeholders in addition to domestic actors 2. Related to import, export or transit of goods
Consult, on a regular basis, border agencies, traders and stakeholders within national territory1
Art. 2.1
Art. 2.2
TFA key measures and its benefits
49
Trade Facilitation Principles
Transparency Simplification
Harmonization
and Normalisation
Modernisation
4 pillars of Trade Facilitation
Collaboration between public and private sectors
MEASURES TO COMBAT CROSS BORDER INEFFICIENCY IN THE TFA
Review fees and formalities
Cross border co-operation
More efficient inspections
Rapid release
Pre-arrival processing
Rewarding mechanisms
Modernization of systems
Lack of transparency leads to:
Multiple fees and charges
Corrupt and discriminatory practices
Costs to mitigate formalities
WHY IS TRANSPARENCY IMPORTANT?
Costs to collect the information
Lack of predictability
Unfair and unpredictable decision making
Mistrust in the trading system
HOW TRANSPARENCY WORKS?
“Transparency is the sunlight which is the best disinfectant”
Transparency is achieved in two ways:
By providing equal and unfettered access to relevant information
By providing mechanisms that ensure fairness and non-discrimination
Transparency will contribute to:
Certainty and predictability
A reduction in corruption
A healthy business environment
Fair application of rules
HOW DOES THE TFA ENSURE FAIRNESS AND NON-DISCRIMINATION?
Fairness and non discrimination is provided for in the TFA in the following articles:
Article 2
Article 3
Article 4
Article 5
Prior publication and consultation
Appeal and review procedures
Advance rulings
Article 6
Article 10
Test Procedures
Fees, charges and penalties
Rejected goods
STILL NOT SATISFIED? YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO APPEAL CUSTOMS DECISIONS
Governments shall provide businesses the right to an appeal or review of any customs decision The appeal or review shall be conducted by an official that is independent of the customs officer, or by an authority at a higher level. If the decision is unduly delayed the business has the right to appeal the next higher level of the administration or judicial authority.
Tariff classification
TFA Article 4 Reference: Guide, page 77.
Refusal or rejection of a claim for drawback or a refund
Assessment of administrative penalties
Customs valuation
Decisions that can be appealed include:
NO MORE DISPROPORTIONATELY HIGH, UNFAIR AND POORLY DOCUMENTED PENALTIES
Rules customs should abide by
Document the rational for the penalty and the rules for determining penalty amount
Only penalize the person responsible for the breach
Ensure that minor errors by businesses, such as clerical errors, do not result in excessive penalties
Consider a ‘voluntary disclosure’ to be a mitigating factor
Avoid scheme that awards customs officers with a percentage of penalties
TFA Article 6.3 Reference: Guide, page 84
Benefits for the traders
You will not be subject to disproportionate or arbitrary customs penalty amounts
Customs must give you a written explanation so that you can make an effective appeal or petition to reduce or cancel the penalty
If you discover and disclose that you made errors, you will be able to avoid, or be subject to a reduced penalty
ARE YOU GIVEN AN IDEA OF THE AVERAGE RELEASE TIME ? THIS INFORMATION WILL BE PUBLISHED
Enhanced predictability
Better planning
Improved management of operations
Governments are encourage to measure and publish periodically, and in a consistent manner, the average release time of goods
TFA Article 6.3 Reference: Guide, page 126.
Covers all border crossing requirements (i.e entire period between the arrival of the goods and their departure from the border crossing point)
Average could be at a particular border entry point and/or a national average
WCO - TRS is one of the tool that may be used to compute average release times
FOCUSING CONTROLS WHERE AND WHEN THEY MATTER: RISK MANAGEMENT AND PCA
Agencies must concentrate their resources on high risk consignment and expedite release of low risk
consignments
Controls should be decided on objective, non-discriminatory and non-arbitrary criteria such as: HS code Goods nature Country of origin Country from which the goods are shipped Value of the goods Compliance record of traders Type of means of transport
Border agencies should shift part of their control away from the border
Post clearance audit
Agencies would very accuracy and authenticity of declarations through the examination of the relevant books, records, business systems and commercial data held by the trader AFTER the release of the consignment
Risk management
TFA Articles 7.4 and 7.5 Reference: Guide, page 125
ASYCUDA: Differentiated customs procedures based on risk
RISK MANAGEMENT CASE STUDIES
Green channel Automatic release for low risk consignment
Yellow channel Documentary control for medium risk shipments
1
2
Risk Management benefits in New Zealand
Red channel Documentary controls coupled with physical inspection
3
Fewer inspections
Less than 5% of import shipments are subject to checks
Faster release time
99% of compliant transactions are processed within 30 minutes
Enhanced customs efficiency
Increase in # of transactions (from 1M/y to 4M/y between 2000-2011) was managed without significant cost increase
Playing your part, the private sector role
GOVERNMENTS HAVE LEGITIMATE POLICY OBJECTIVES TO IMPLEMENT BORDER CONTROLS
Revenue collection
In developing countries duties and taxes can account up to 50% of government revenues
The increasing security threats (e.g. terrorism) and booming drug trafficking requires adequate response from border authorities
Concern about public health, fauna and flora and the environment
Protection from unfair international practices
Prevent smuggling and entry of banned products
Answer new demands for protection from society
AND BUSINESS HAVE LEGITIMATE REASONS TO REQUEST SIMPLE, CHEAP AND EFFICIENT BORDERS
Business performance
Inefficient borders lead to direct and indirect costs that jeopardize businesses financial and operational performances
Inefficient borders pushes imported inputs prices up and reduces business competitiveness
Input prices Business environment
Inefficient borders drive out foreign direct investment that are critical to create a dynamic business environment
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR HAVE A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY TO CREATE A FACILITATIVE TRADE ENVIRONMENT
Personal vested
interests
Control mindset
Turf issues
Individual over
business community interests
Avoidance
Evasion
Public sector Private sector
Fairness & Transparency
Less evasion and personal vested
interests
More reasonable
controls
Greater efficiency
Facilitative mind-set Overly complex and
unfair rules
Evasion and personal vested
interests
Excessive controls
Greater inefficiency
Non facilitative mindset
All stakeholders must contribute to the shift from an inefficiency cycle to an efficiency cycle
SO WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR “FACILITATION MINDSET”? EVERYONE, INCLUDING YOU!
The efficiency cycle The inefficiency cycle
What you can do at the business community level
2
TWO AREAS OF FOCUS
What you can do at the company level 1
FIX THE ROOF WHILE THE SUN IS SHINING!
The 4 step process to compliance
Develop trusted relationships
Participate in the consultative process Stay informed
Getting your own systems in order and be
compliant and honest
LEARN TO WORK WITH YOUR CUSTOMS BROKERS AND FREIGHT FORWARDERS
Understand the role of the agent, know what it is that they do’ 1
Be clear about liability, you are liable to the cross border agencies 2
Know how to instruct and do it formally (Forwarders Instruction) 3
Be aware of vested interests 4
“SILOS ARE ONLY FOR GRAINS” – THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY SHOULD ACT TOGEHER
Organize yourself as a voice
Get involved in public-private dialogue platforms and know your rights
There are four main types of actions to take as a business community
Engage with cross border agencies
Substantiate your position and recommendation with evidences: data and experiences
FIGHT FOR INCLUSIVE, COMPREHENSIVE, AND COORDINATED PPD FORUMS
To be effective and successful, businesses must coordinate amongst themselves
Be involved in the prioritization of reforms, policy formulation, implementation through PPP and monitoring
Ensure that all economic sectors and companies of all sizes are represented in the PPD process
Coordinated Inclusive Comprehensive
REMINDER: ARTICLE 2 OF THE TFA STRUCTURES PUBLIC-PRIVATE DIALOGUE
Provide traders opportunity and appropriate time to comment on new or amended trade laws and regulations
Hold regular consultations between border agencies and traders Art. 2.2
Art. 2.1.a
Art 2.1.b
Publish trade related laws and regulation as early as possible before their entry into force
Establishing a National Trade Facilitation Committee is a must !
NATIONAL TRADE FACILITATION COMMITTEES: HAVE YOUR SAY IN THE TF REFORM PROCESS
All border agencies and representative from the private sector must be represented to coordinate and facilitate trade facilitation reforms
It is your right – and your duty – to be consulted and contribute Join the hand of the government to make the NTFC work
How can you contribute What is the mandate of the National Trade Facilitation
Committee
HOW CAN THE NATIONAL TRADE FACILITATION COMMITTEE CONTRIBUTE
Identify bottlenecks to cross-border trade
Formulate recommendation for regulatory and procedural reforms
Monitor the effective implementation of trade facilitation reforms
Have a seat at the table
Ask that private sector be represented in the governance structure
Participate in activities
Contribute to financing
Presenting ITC’s integrated TF program
73
Improving SMEs Competitiveness for exports
through implementing the Trade Facilitation Agreement
Scheduling commitments
under the WTO TFA
Improving inter-agency coordination
and SME involvement in
PPD
Enhancing transparency and access to
information
Strengthening SMEs ability to cross borders
Improving efficiency of cross-border procedures
In-house expertize and intellectual leadership
Facilitating public-private dialogue in trade policy formulation
Implementing TFA to promote and deepen regional integration
Collaborating with leading public and private TF agencies
Focus: Comply with TFA short term requirements
74
Support TFA categorization process: Category A, B, or C and estimate indicative and definitive implementation dates
Support evaluation of financial and technical assistance required for Category C provisions
Assist in preparing bankable project plans to raise donor funds and mobilize technical assistance
Support domestic ratification process: for acceptance of protocol of amendment and notifications to the WTO
Comply with TFA short term
requirements
Strengthen SMEs ability to cross
borders
75
Enhance SMEs ability to comply with existing trade procedures: training, networking with border officials…
Connect SMEs with logistic providers: for integration of SMEs in global value chains
Support informal cross-border traders to go formal: Building on WICBT project already on-going in Uganda and Burundi
Enhance TSI capacities to support private sector in managing cross-border operations
Focus: Strengthen SMEs ability to cross borders
6 new publications on trade facilitation
Enabling trade: catalyzing TFA implementation in Brazil • In collaboration with WEF
Enabling trade: increasing the potential of trade reforms • In collaboration with WEF
SMEs and the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement: a training manual • In collaboration with ICC,
UNCTAD and UNECE
National Trade Facilitation Committees: Moving towards implementation • In collaboration with UNCTAD
and UNECE
Global Survey on TF and Paperless Trade Implementation • In collaboration with UN regional
commissions
Paperless trade facilitation for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises • Ongoing