ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT OF NATIONS (2007) TAKE ACTION The …€¦ · ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT AND...

2
10 8 6 4 2 0 0.80 0.80 0.85 0.86 0.86 0.90 0.81 0.88 0.93 0.77 0.89 0.88 0.87 0.88 0.84 0.69 0.77 0.93 0.85 0.85 0.83 0.82 0.84 0.74 0.75 0.88 0.87 0.86 0.84 0.85 0.90 0.86 0.73 0.87 0.88 0.78 0.70 0.78 0.70 0.78 0.69 0.73 0.80 0.65 0.72 0.76 0.41 0.37 0.77 0.63 0.72 0.74 0.74 0.80 0.69 0.70 0.68 0.74 0.70 0.75 0.67 0.71 0.68 0.61 0.42 0.76 0.64 0.73 0.64 0.25 0.59 0.64 0.59 0.42 0.66 0.64 0.29 0.68 0.59 0.71 0.66 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.69 0.43 0.42 0.54 0.45 0.68 0.60 0.37 0.30 0.33 0.60 0.66 0.55 0.71 0.40 0.58 0.48 0.65 0.41 0.64 0.55 0.61 0.31 0.29 0.63 0.47 0.28 0.15 0.58 0.42 0.55 0.64 0.58 0.38 0.45 0.30 0.40 0.41 0.30 0.45 0.48 0.35 0.39 0.39 0.56 0.42 0.48 0.28 0.42 0.50 0.37 0.26 0.27 0.48 0.23 0.36 0.40 0.32 0.45 0.46 ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT OF NATIONS (2007) TAKE ACTION What Governments Can Do Adopt the Ecological Footprint as a resource management tool to monitor and manage ecological assets. Establish Footprint targets. Develop and implement action plans. Join international efforts to improve Footprint methodology. Set policy that is informed by ecological reality and makes safeguarding resources a top priority. What Others Are Doing To find out how the Footprint is being used to advance sustainability around the world, visit: www.footprintnetwork.org What You Can Do Encourage governments and organizations to track their demand on nature. Estimate your own Ecological Footprint at www.footprintnetwork.org/calculator Agencies of various national governments have commissioned reviews of the Footprint method, including Switzerland, the European Union, France, Germany, Luxembourg and the United Arab Emirates. These are available at www.footprintnetwork.org/reviews For more on: Africa: www.footprintnetwork.org/africa Mediterranean: www.footprintnetwork.org/med Human Development: www.footprintnetwork.org/hdi Biodiversity: www.footprintnetwork.org/biodiversity The Ecological Footprint measures humanity’s demand on nature. For more Ecological Footprint data and to learn how it is calculated, visit www.footprintnetwork.org Built-up land Food, fiber, and timber land Carbon Footprint In 2007, humanity’s average Footprint was 2.7 global hectares* per person. In 2007, available biocapacity was 1.8 global hectares* per person (This must also include the needs of wild species.) ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT (Global hectares per person) HDI The Human Development Index (HDI), developed by UNDP, compares countries based on quality of life indicators such as life expectancy, education level, and income. The United Nations considers a country with an HDI that is within the top quartile to have “very high human development”, and an HDI in the 51 – 75 percentiles to have “high human development,” a threshold that today stands at 0.67. United Arab Emirates Qatar Luxembourg Denmark Belgium United States of America Estonia Canada Australia Kuwait Ireland Netherlands Finland Sweden Czech Republic Macedonia Latvia Norway Spain Greece Singapore Slovenia Austria Saudi Arabia Uruguay Germany Switzerland France Italy Oman United Kingdom New Zealand Korea, Republic of Malaysia Israel Japan Lithuania Kazakhstan Portugal Russia Poland Mauritius Bulgaria Slovakia Turkmenistan Belarus Croatia Nepal Gambia Chile Paraguay Trinidad and Tobago Libya Mexico Hungary Brazil Lebanon Ukraine Venezuela Panama Bosnia and Herzegovina Romania Turkey World Costa Rica Iran Botswana Mauritania Argentina Bolivia Serbia Thailand Niger South Africa China Namibia Papua New Guinea Jordan El Salvador Mali Jamaica Honduras Albania Tunisia Ecuador Azerbaijan Colombia Cuba Georgia Madagascar Myanmar Guatemala Ghana Armenia Uzbekistan Sudan Chad Guinea Egypt Algeria Nicaragua Peru Uganda Syrian Arab Republic Swaziland Dominican Republic Nigeria Somalia Gabon Viet Nam Moldova Iraq Korea DPR Central African Rep Burkina Faso Philippines Laos Liberia Zimbabwe Kyrgyzstan Benin Morocco Sri Lanka Indonesia Tanzania Kenya Ethiopia Senegal Lesotho Sierra Leone Cameroon Cambodia Rwanda Côte d’Ivoire Angola Tajikistan Togo Congo Guinea-Bissau Yemen India Zambia Burundi Eritrea Mozambique Pakistan Congo, Dem Rep Malawi Haiti Afghanistan Bangladesh Timor-Leste Country HDI Years of Life Expectancy Mean Years of Schooling Per capita GNI** Russia 0.70 66.2 8.8 $13,000 Peru 0.71 72.9 9.3 $7,000 Germany 0.88 79.7 12.2 $34,000 Data from 2010 Edition, National Footprint Accounts. For more information, visit: www.footprintnetwork.org/atlas * Global hectares are hectares with world-average productivity. One hectare is equal to 2.5 acres. ** Gross National Income. Adjusted for purchasing power.

Transcript of ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT OF NATIONS (2007) TAKE ACTION The …€¦ · ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT AND...

Page 1: ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT OF NATIONS (2007) TAKE ACTION The …€¦ · ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT AND POPULATION BY REGION (2007) Ecological Overshoot: The average human’s Ecological Footprint

10

12

8

6

4

2

0

Uni

ted

Ara

b Em

irate

s

Qat

ar

Luxe

mbo

urg

Den

mar

k

Belg

ium

Uni

ted

Stat

es o

f Am

eric

a

Esto

nia

Can

ada

Aus

tral

ia

Kuw

ait

Irel

and

Net

herla

nds

Finl

and

Swed

en

Cze

ch R

epub

lic

Mac

edon

ia

Latv

ia

Nor

way

Spai

n

Gre

ece

Sing

apor

e

Slov

enia

Aus

tria

Saud

i Ara

bia

Uru

guay

Ger

man

y

Switz

erla

nd

Fran

ce

Italy

Om

an

Uni

ted

King

dom

New

Zea

land

Kore

a, R

epub

lic o

f

Mal

aysi

a

Isra

el

Japa

n

Lith

uani

a

Kaza

khst

an

Port

ugal

Russ

ia

Pola

nd

Mau

ritiu

s

Bulg

aria

Slov

akia

Turk

men

ista

n

Bela

rus

Cro

atia

Nep

al

Gam

bia

Chi

le

Para

guay

Trin

idad

and

Tob

ago

Liby

a

Mex

ico

Hun

gary

Braz

il

Leba

non

Ukr

aine

Vene

zuel

a

Pana

ma

Bosn

ia a

nd H

erze

govi

na

Rom

ania

Turk

ey

Wor

ld

Cos

ta R

ica

Iran

Bots

wan

a

Mau

ritan

ia

Arg

entin

a

Boliv

ia

Serb

ia

Thai

land

Nig

er

Sout

h A

fric

a

Chi

na

Nam

ibia

Papu

a N

ew G

uine

a

Jord

an

El S

alva

dor

Mal

i

Jam

aica

Hon

dura

s

Alb

ania

Tuni

sia

Ecua

dor

Aze

rbai

jan

Col

ombi

a

Cub

a

Geo

rgia

Mad

agas

car

Mya

nmar

Gua

tem

ala

Gha

na

Arm

enia

Uzb

ekis

tan

Suda

n

Cha

d

Gui

nea

Egyp

t

Alg

eria

Nic

arag

ua

Peru

Uga

nda

Syria

n A

rab

Repu

blic

Swaz

iland

Dom

inic

an R

epub

lic

Nig

eria

Som

alia

Gab

on

Viet

Nam

Mol

dova

Iraq

Kore

a D

PR

Cen

tral

Afr

ican

Rep

Burk

ina

Faso

Phili

ppin

es

Laos

Libe

ria

Zim

babw

e

Kyrg

yzst

an

Beni

n

Mor

occo

Sri L

anka

Indo

nesi

a

Tanz

ania

Keny

a

Ethi

opia

Sene

gal

Leso

tho

Sier

ra L

eone

Cam

eroo

n

Cam

bodi

a

Rwan

da

Côt

e d'

Ivoi

re

Ang

ola

Tajik

ista

n

Togo

Con

go

Gui

nea-

Biss

au

Yem

en

Indi

a

Zam

bia

Buru

ndi

Eritr

ea

Moz

ambi

que

Paki

stan

Con

go, D

em R

ep

Mal

awi

Hai

ti

Afg

hani

stan

Bang

lade

sh

Tim

or-L

este

0.80

0.80

0.85

0.86

0.86

0.90

0.81

0.88

0.93

0.77

0.89

0.88

0.87

0.88

0.84

0.69

0.77

0.93

0.85

0.85

0.83

0.82

0.84

0.74

0.75

0.88

0.87

0.86

0.84

0.85

0.90

0.86

0.73

0.87

0.88

0.78

0.70

0.78

0.70

0.78

0.69

0.73

0.80

0.65

0.72

0.76

0.41

0.37

0.77

0.63

0.72

0.74

0.74

0.80

0.69

0.70

0.68

0.74

0.70

0.75

0.67

0.71

0.68

0.61

0.42

0.76

0.64

0.73

0.64

0.25

0.59

0.64

0.59

0.42

0.66

0.64

0.29

0.68

0.59

0.71

0.66

0.68

0.68

0.67

0.69

0.43

0.42

0.54

0.45

0.68

0.60

0.37

0.30

0.33

0.60

0.66

0.55

0.71

0.40

0.58

0.48

0.65

0.41

0.64

0.55

0.61

0.31

0.29

0.63

0.47

0.28

0.15

0.58

0.42

0.55

0.64

0.58

0.38

0.45

0.30

0.40

0.41

0.30

0.45

0.48

0.35

0.39

0.39

0.56

0.42

0.48

0.28

0.42

0.50

0.37

0.26

0.27

0.48

0.23

0.36

0.40

0.32

0.45

0.46

0.80

0.80

0.85

0.86

0.86

0.90

0.81

0.88

0.93

0.77

0.89

0.88

0.87

0.88

0.84

0.69

0.77

0.93

0.85

0.85

0.83

0.82

0.84

0.74

0.75

0.88

0.87

0.86

0.84

0.85

0.90

0.86

0.73

0.87

0.88

0.78

0.70

0.78

0.70

0.78

0.69

0.73

0.80

0.65

0.72

0.76

0.41

0.37

0.77

0.63

0.72

0.74

0.74

0.80

0.69

0.70

0.68

0.74

0.70

0.75

0.67

0.71

0.68

0.61

0.42

0.76

0.64

0.73

0.64

0.25

0.59

0.64

0.59

0.42

0.66

0.64

0.29

0.68

0.59

0.71

0.66

0.68

0.68

0.67

0.69

0.43

0.42

0.54

0.45

0.68

0.60

0.37

0.30

0.33

0.60

0.66

0.55

0.71

0.40

0.58

0.48

0.65

0.41

0.64

0.55

0.61

0.31

0.29

0.63

0.47

0.28

0.15

0.58

0.42

0.55

0.64

0.58

0.38

0.45

0.30

0.40

0.41

0.30

0.45

0.48

0.35

0.39

0.39

0.56

0.42

0.48

0.28

0.42

0.50

0.37

0.26

0.27

0.48

0.23

0.36

0.40

0.32

0.45

0.46

ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT OF NATIONS (2007) TAKE ACTION

What Governments Can Do Adopt the Ecological Footprint as a resource management tool to monitor and manage ecological assets. Establish Footprint targets. Develop and implement action plans. Join international efforts to improve Footprint methodology. Set policy that is informed by ecological reality and makes safeguarding resources a top priority.

What Others Are Doing To find out how the Footprint is being used to advance sustainability around the world, visit: www.footprintnetwork.org

What You Can Do Encourage governments and organizations to track their demand on nature. Estimate your own Ecological Footprint at www.footprintnetwork.org/calculator

Agencies of various national governments have commissioned reviews of the Footprint method, including Switzerland, the European Union, France, Germany, Luxembourg and the United Arab Emirates. These are available at www.footprintnetwork.org/reviews

For more on: Africa: www.footprintnetwork.org/africa Mediterranean: www.footprintnetwork.org/med Human Development: www.footprintnetwork.org/hdi Biodiversity: www.footprintnetwork.org/biodiversity

The Ecological Footprint measures humanity’s demand on nature. For more Ecological Footprint data and to learn how it is calculated, visit www.footprintnetwork.org

Built-up landFood, fiber, and timber land Carbon Footprint

In 2007, humanity’s average Footprint was 2.7 global hectares* per person.

In 2007, available biocapacity was 1.8 global hectares* per person (This must also include the needs of wild species.)

ECO

LOG

ICA

L FO

OTP

RIN

T (G

loba

l hec

tare

s pe

r pe

rson

)

HDI

The Human Development Index (HDI), developed by UNDP, compares countries based on quality of life indicators such as life expectancy, education level, and income. The United Nations considers a country with an HDI that is within the top quartile to have “very high human development”, and an HDI in the 51 – 75 percentiles to have “high human development,” a threshold that today stands at 0.67.

Uni

ted

Ara

b Em

irate

s

Qat

ar

Luxe

mbo

urg

Den

mar

k

Belg

ium

Uni

ted

Stat

es o

f Am

eric

a

Esto

nia

Can

ada

Aus

tral

ia

Kuw

ait

Irel

and

Net

herla

nds

Finl

and

Swed

en

Cze

ch R

epub

lic

Mac

edon

ia

Latv

ia

Nor

way

Spai

n

Gre

ece

Sing

apor

e

Slov

enia

Aus

tria

Saud

i Ara

bia

Uru

guay

Ger

man

y

Switz

erla

nd

Fran

ce

Italy

Om

an

Uni

ted

King

dom

New

Zea

land

Kore

a, R

epub

lic o

f

Mal

aysi

a

Isra

el

Japa

n

Lith

uani

a

Kaza

khst

an

Port

ugal

Russ

ia

Pola

nd

Mau

ritiu

s

Bulg

aria

Slov

akia

Turk

men

ista

n

Bela

rus

Cro

atia

Nep

al

Gam

bia

Chi

le

Para

guay

Trin

idad

and

Tob

ago

Liby

a

Mex

ico

Hun

gary

Braz

il

Leba

non

Ukr

aine

Vene

zuel

a

Pana

ma

Bosn

ia a

nd H

erze

govi

na

Rom

ania

Turk

ey

Wor

ld

Cos

ta R

ica

Iran

Bots

wan

a

Mau

ritan

ia

Arg

entin

a

Boliv

ia

Serb

ia

Thai

land

Nig

er

Sout

h A

fric

a

Chi

na

Nam

ibia

Papu

a N

ew G

uine

a

Jord

an

El S

alva

dor

Mal

i

Jam

aica

Hon

dura

s

Alb

ania

Tuni

sia

Ecua

dor

Aze

rbai

jan

Col

ombi

a

Cub

a

Geo

rgia

Mad

agas

car

Mya

nmar

Gua

tem

ala

Gha

na

Arm

enia

Uzb

ekis

tan

Suda

n

Cha

d

Gui

nea

Egyp

t

Alg

eria

Nic

arag

ua

Peru

Uga

nda

Syria

n A

rab

Repu

blic

Swaz

iland

Dom

inic

an R

epub

lic

Nig

eria

Som

alia

Gab

on

Viet

Nam

Mol

dova

Iraq

Kore

a D

PR

Cen

tral

Afr

ican

Rep

Burk

ina

Faso

Phili

ppin

es

Laos

Libe

ria

Zim

babw

e

Kyrg

yzst

an

Beni

n

Mor

occo

Sri L

anka

Indo

nesi

a

Tanz

ania

Keny

a

Ethi

opia

Sene

gal

Leso

tho

Sier

ra L

eone

Cam

eroo

n

Cam

bodi

a

Rwan

da

Côt

e d’

Ivoi

re

Ang

ola

Tajik

ista

n

Togo

Con

go

Gui

nea-

Biss

au

Yem

en

Indi

a

Zam

bia

Buru

ndi

Eritr

ea

Moz

ambi

que

Paki

stan

Con

go, D

em R

ep

Mal

awi

Hai

ti

Afg

hani

stan

Bang

lade

sh

Tim

or-L

este

Country HDI Years of Life Expectancy Mean Years of Schooling Per capita GNI**

Russia 0.70 66.2 8.8 $13,000

Peru 0.71 72.9 9.3 $7,000

Germany 0.88 79.7 12.2 $34,000

Data from 2010 Edition, National Footprint Accounts. For more information, visit: www.footprintnetwork.org/atlas

* Global hectares are hectares with world-average productivity. One hectare is equal to 2.5 acres. ** Gross National Income. Adjusted for purchasing power.

Page 2: ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT OF NATIONS (2007) TAKE ACTION The …€¦ · ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT AND POPULATION BY REGION (2007) Ecological Overshoot: The average human’s Ecological Footprint

1961

0

0.5

1

1.5

1965

1969

1973

1993

1997

2001

2005

1977

1981

1985

1989

Built-up Land

Food, Fiber and Timber Land

Carbon Uptake Land

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

0

2

4

6

8

10

1210

8

6

2

4

354 921575 3596535342

ECO

LOG

ICA

L FO

OTP

RIN

T (G

loba

l hec

tare

s pe

r pe

rson

)

POPULATION (Millions)

0

T H E E C O LO G I C A L F O OT P R I N T

L IV ING WELL WITHIN THE MEANS

OF NATURE

ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT AND POPULATION BY REGION (2007)

Ecological Overshoot: The average human’s Ecological Footprint is 2.7 global hectares (6.7 acres), while there are only 1.8 global hectares (4.5 acres) of biologically productive area per person available on the planet. This “deficit spending” is called overshoot. It is possible to exceed ecological limits for a while, but overshoot ultimately leads to the destruction of ecological assets, resulting in depleted groundwater, collapsing fisheries, CO2 accumulation in the atmosphere, and deforestation. Thus, not only the basis of economic development but also the livelihood of humankind is being threatened.

HUMANITY’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT Humanity’s Ecological Footprint is shown here in number of planets, where one planet equals the total biocapacity of the Earth in any given year. In 2007, humanity’s Ecological Footprint was 2.5 times that of 1961 and exceeded by one half the Earth’s biocapacity.

Increasing Human Demand on Nature (1961-2007)

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: WHERE ARE WE TODAY?Human Development Index and Ecological Footprint of Nations (2007)

Sustainable development can be assessed using the Human Development Index (HDI) as an indicator of human development, and the Ecological Footprint as a measure of human demand on the biosphere. The United Nations considers an HDI for the countries within the top quartile to be “very high human development.” An Ecological Footprint less than 1.8 global hectares per person makes those resource demands globally replicable. Despite growing adoption of sustainable development as an explicit policy goal, almost no country meets both minimum requirements.

LIVING ON ONE EARTH

Sustainable development means securing a high quality of life within the limits of what the planet can renewably provide.

What is the Ecological Footprint? It is a resource management and com-munications tool that measures how much nature we have, how much we use, and who uses what. It represents the area of biologically productive land and sea (biocapacity) that an individual, population or activity requires to provide the resources it consumes and to absorb its CO2, using prevailing technology.

Are their standards available for the Footprint method? Yes: www.footprintstandards.org

For more information see www.footprintnetwork.org

BIOCAPACITY CREDITORS AND DEBTORS (2007)

ECO

LOG

ICA

L FO

OTP

RIN

T (G

loba

l hec

tare

s pe

r pe

rson

)

With global overshoot growing, the map has shifted over the last 50 years from one in which most countries had more biocapacity than they used, to one in which the vast majority have a biocapacity deficit – they use more than they have, meaning they must import resources, deplete their own stocks or utilize the global commons of atmosphere and ocean. Today, more than 80 percent of the world’s people live in countries that are biocapacity debtors.

ECO

LOG

ICA

L FO

OTP

RIN

T (G

loba

l hec

tare

s pe

r pe

rson

)

Carbon Footprint

Food, Fiber and Timber Footprint

OUR MISSION

Global Footprint Network supports the shift towards a sustainable economy by advancing the Ecological Footprint, a measurement, communications and management tool that makes resource limits central to decision-making everywhere. www.footprintnetwork.org

Established on 1 January 2011, GIZ brings together under one roof the long-standing expertise of the DED, the GTZ and InWEnt. As a federally owned enterprise, it supports the German government in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development. It is also engaged in international education work around the globe. www.giz.de/en

150% larger100-150% larger50-100% larger0-50% larger

0-50% larger50-100% larger100-150% larger150% larger

BIOCAPACITY DEFICITFOOTPRINT GREATER THAN BIOCAPACITY

BIOCAPACITY RESERVEBIOCAPACITY GREATER THAN FOOTPRINT

World biocapacity Built-up land

North America

Europe

Latin America & Caribbean

Middle East & Central Asia

Asia-Pacific

Africa

North America

Europe

Latin America & Caribbean

Asia

Oceania

Africa

Global average available biocapacity per person. (This must also include the needs of wild species.)

Threshold for high human development

Global average available biocapacity per person. (This must also include the needs of wild species.)

Threshold for very high human development

Sustainable Develop-ment Quadrant

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

1.5

1

0.5

0

HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX

ECO

LOG

ICA

L FO

OTP

RIN

T (N

umbe

r of

Pla

nets

)

342 575 535 354 3,596 921

10

8

6

4

2

0

POPULATION (Millions)

Warning: Contains infectious ideas. Unfolding may be irreversible.