7/27/2019 Eco Project 2014

1/7

Introduction:-

An amazing amount of money is spent on the armed forces, which depend heavily

on imports of everything from weapons systems to spares, even as they are increasingly

deployed to deal with internal conflicts. This article points out that both the dependence on

arms imports and the expansion of the forces to tackle domestic troubles not only push up

costs but also jeopardise the countrys strategic manoeuvrability. It contends that it is high

time the received wisdom on these matters was closely examined.

A military budget (or military expenditure), also known as defencebudget,is the

amount offinancial resources dedicated by an entity (most often anation or astate), to

raising and maintaining anarmed forces.Military budgets often reflect how strongly an entity

perceives the likelihood of threats against it, or the amount of aggression it wishes to employ.

It also gives an idea of how much financing should be provided for the upcoming year. The

size of a budget also reflects the entity's ability to fund military activities. Factors include thesize of that entity's economy, other financial demands on that entity, and the willingness of

that entity's government or people to fund such military activity. Generally excluded from

military expenditures is spending oninternal law enforcement and disabled veteran

rehabilitation.

According to theStockholm International Peace Research Institute,in 2011, world

military expenditure for the world amounted to 1.735 trillionUS$.

The world's five largest military spenders (theUnited States,China,Russia,

theUnited Kingdom andFrance)are recognized to be world with each being a veto-wieldingpermanent member of theUnited Nations Security Council,which was established after the

end ofWorld War II.However in 2012,Japan spent slightly more on defence than

France.Saudi Arabia is another notable military spender of recent times and now ranks 7th&

India ranks 8thin the world.

Rank CountrySpending ($

Bn.)% ofGDP World share (%)

Spending ($

Bn.PPP)

8t India 46.1 2.5 2.6 119

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budgethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armed_forceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_enforcementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_International_Peace_Research_Institutehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_dollarhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdomhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Councilhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_IIhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchasing_power_parityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Armed_Forceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Armed_Forceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchasing_power_parityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_IIhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Councilhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdomhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_dollarhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_International_Peace_Research_Institutehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_enforcementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armed_forceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget

7/27/2019 Eco Project 2014

2/7

Share of Defence Services:-

The Army with an approximate budget of Rs. 99,707.8 crore accounts for 49 per

cent of the latest defence budget, followed by the Air Force (Rs. 57,502.9 crore), Navy (Rs.

36,343.5 crore), Defence Research and Development Organisation (Rs. 10,610.2 crore) and

Ordnance Factories (- Rs. 508.7 crore) (see Figure I). It is noteworthy that compared to the

previous budget, the Air Force is the only service which has increased its share in the total

defence allocation (from 24.9 per cent to 28.2 per cent). The Navys share has decreased the

most (by 1.4 percentage points), whereas the Armys and DRDOs shares have declined by

1.3 and 0.3 percentage points, respectively. It is also noteworthy that except for the Air Force,

which has seen an increase in both the revenue expenditure and capital expenditure, the

others have a decline in one of these heads.

Figure I: %Share of Services in Defence Budget 2013-14

Indias annual budget does not spell out the assumptions underlying financial

allocations, although the allocations are informed by them and funds for various departments

and ministries of the central government are determined within parameters and definitions set

by policy decisions. This issue acquires importance in the absence of a robust debate on

military or security matters. There is in general a fawning acceptance of the militarys role in

the service of the nation state even as the steel frame shows signs of corrosion from its

dependence on arms imports and the role it plays in the suppression of our own people. The

passage of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) by the United Nations (UN) General Assembly on 2

April 2013 made the linkage palpably clear.

7/27/2019 Eco Project 2014

3/7

The strength of the three services is now 1.3 million. If the one million in the central

paramilitary forces (CPMFs) is added, the armed forces with 2.3 million accounts for nearly

half of all central government employees, estimated to be 4.7 million in 2013 (which includes

1.3 million railway and 4,80,000 postal employees). Consider this to get an idea of the

rapidity of employment generation in the armed forcesin 2012, the strength of CPMFs was8, 70,000, but it is slated to rise to one million in 2013. Compared to the Indian Railways

(stagnant) or the postal department (marginal increase), the most employment generation in

government services is taking place in the military sector. For example, the Indo-Tibetan

Border Police (ITBP) had 1,500 personnel in 1962, 77,000 in 2012, and it will be 89,000 by

2015. Phenomenal growth indeed.

Defence Budget 2013-14: Key Statistics

With the modest growth in the new defence budget, its key indicators show a

downward revision except for the percentage share of the capital expenditure in the totaldefence budget (see Table I). Of note is the further decline of the share of the defence budget

in GDP, which is now the lowest over the past five decades since 1961-62 when it was only

1.66.

Table I: Comparative Statistics of Defence Budgets, 2011-12 & 2012-13

2012-13 2013-14

Defence Budget (Rs. in Crore) 1,93,407.29 2,03,672.12

Growth of Defence Budget (%) 17.63 5.31

Revenue Expenditure (Rs. in Crore) 1,13,828.66 1,16,931.41

Growth of Revenue Expenditure (%) 19.55 2.73

Share of Revenue Expenditure in Defence Budget (%) 58.85 57.41

Capital Expenditure (Rs. in Crore) 79,578.63 86,740.71

Growth of Capital Expenditure (%) 15.00 9.00

Share of Capital Expenditure in Defence Budget (%) 41.15 42.59

Share of Defence Budget in GDP (%) 1.90 1.79

Share of Defence Budget in Central Government

Expenditure (%)12.97 12.23

7/27/2019 Eco Project 2014

4/7

Impact on Modernisation:-

The Indian armed forces are on a massive modernisation process, although the

intensity varies from one service to another. Besides the existing ones, contracts worth

several billions of dollars are expected to be signed in 2013-14. Among the services, the Air

Force, the most capital intensive service, is expected to sign the $15-20 billion contract for

126 French Rafale fighters early in the next financial year. Besides, it has already selected the

prospective suppliers for at least three more big contracts22 Boeing AH-64D Apache

Longbow attack helicopters ($1.2 billion); 15 Boeing CH-47F Chinook heavy lift helicopters

($1.4 billion), and six Airbus A330 Multi Role Tanker Transport ($1.0 billion)which are

expected to be signed in the near future. The Navy is also expected to sign a $1.0 billion

contract for 16 multi-role helicopters, which is at an advance stage of vendor selection. The

Army on its part is hoping that its much delayed artillery programme finally gets going in

2013, with the procurement of 145 ultra-light howitzers ($647 million).

Given the long list of new acquisition proposals, the question is how much the new

defence budget supports it. It is most noteworthy that the modernisation budget is earmarked

for committed liabilities, with little money available for new schemes. For instance, for the

years 2011-12 and 2012-13, the overall ratio between these stands at roughly 85:15, although

there exists a significant variation among the services and between the years. Nonetheless,

assuming the same ratio in the new allocation, total available funds for new schemes would

be little over Rs. 11,000 crore, which is probably enough for the first stage payment towards

the Rafale deal. This means that there is very little money available for other new schemes

including of the Air Force, which, despite having a 30 per cent hike in its modernisation

budget, would still need more money to sustain its modernisation drive. For the Army and

Navy, the resource constraint is more severe, with negative growth in their respective

modernisation budgets (Table II).

Table II: Allocation for Modernisation of Armed Forces

BE 2012-13

(Rs in Cr)

RE 2012-

13 (Rs in

Cr)

Under/over

Spending

(Rs in Cr)

Under/over

Spending

(%)

BE 2013-14

(Rs in Cr)

% Growth of

BE 2013-14

over BE

2012-13

Army 13804.02 11568.76 2235.26 16.19 13327.04 -3.46

Navy 24151.51 17651.51 6500 26.91 23478.78 -2.79

Air

Force 28503.9 28575.99 -72.09 -0.25 37048.06 29.98

Total 66459.43 57796.26 8663.17 13.04 73853.88 11.13

7/27/2019 Eco Project 2014

5/7

Foreign Dependent Indigenisation:-

Russian, German, or French Scorpene submarines under construction at Mazagon

Docks at a cost of Rs 23,562 crore and running three years behind schedule, will be capable

of using BrahMos (Times of India, 21 March 2013). Instead, an indigenously developed

submarine, Project 75-India, is to be constructed. However, this project is yet to take off and

even a request for proposal has not been issued. Thus every step taken towards developing

indigenous capability is negated by a lack of progress in other areas. Indigenous efforts also

get stalled due to delays in decision-making. On 20 March 2013, India successfully test-

fired the 290-km-range BrahMos underwater missile, reportedly becoming the first country to

do so. The catch is that India lacks submarines on which these missiles can be mounted for

launch.

Lip Service to Indigenisation:-

In the wake of the current debate surrounding the 556.3 million deal for the

procurement of 12 VVIP helicopters, one argument that has been reiterated again is that

indigenisation is a viable alternative to avoid controversy. However, the focus on

indigenisation is somehow missing in the defence ministrys budget document. This is

evident from the utilisation and allocation of resources for the Make projects under which

domestic industry, particularly the private sector, is required to design and produce advanced

platforms for the armed forces. Of the total allocation of Rs. 89.2 crore made in 2012-13, not

a single rupee has been utilised so far. Moreover, the allocation has been further reduced to a

mere Rs. 1.0 core in the new budget, implying that no major work can be undertaken for the

two army projectsTactical Communication System (TCS) and Future Infantry Combat

System (FICV) - which have been identified for development by the domestic players.

Defence Budget 2013-14: Negative Real Growth:-

The modest increase in the defence budget comes in the wake of high inflationary

and unfavourable exchange rate regimes. As the Economic Survey brings out, the average

inflation rate during the first nine months of 2012-13 was high at 7.6 per cent and 10 per cent,

measured in terms of Whole Sale Price Index (WPI) and Consumer Price Index-New Series

(CPI-NS), respectively. Even assuming a one percentage reduction in annual inflation in2013-14, which is quite optimistic, the real growth of the new defence budget is still in the

negativeby 1.3 per cent and 3.7 per cent in terms of WPI and CPI-NS, respectively. The

negative real growth in the defence budget is further worsened by a high exchange rate,

particularly with respect to the US dollar which at Rs. 54.5 per unit is still 14 per cent higher

than in 2012-13.

The negative growth in the latest defence budget would not necessary affect all its

elements in the same way. The salary portion of the budget, a significant portion of revenue

expenditure, is more or less insulated with suitable periodic increase in dearness allowance.

The most affected elements of the budget would be revenue works, transportation, and most

7/27/2019 Eco Project 2014

6/7

importantly revenue stores and capital acquisition, which are critical for modernisation and

preparedness.

Downward Revision of Budget 2012-13

Although the defence budget 2013-14 has been increased by a modest 5.3 per cent,

the growth rate is a hefty 14.1 per cent over the revised estimate of 2012-13. The difference

in these growth rates is due to the cut of Rs. 14,903.8 crore (or 7.7 per cent) from the budget

of 2012-13. Of the total reduction, 67 per cent is accounted for by capital expenditure, which

has been reduced by Rs. 10,000 crore (12.6 per cent) from the original allocation. Of the total

cut in capital expenditure, around 87 per cent is due to what is generally known as under-

spending of the modernisation budget, which has been reduced by Rs. 8,663.2 crore (13 per

cent) to Rs. 57,796.3 crore. Around 75 per cent of this is accounted for by the Navy whose

modernization budget has been reduced by Rs. 6,500 crore (26.9 per cent) to Rs. 17,651.5

crore, partly due to slippage of delivery of the aircraft carrier INS Vikramaditya by almostone year to late 2013. For its part, the revenue expenditure was revised downward by Rs.

4,903.8 crore (4.3 per cent). Around 53 per cent of this reduction is due to cut in the pay and

allowances of the armed forces.

Defence Budget Comes under Economic and Fiscal Stress:-

The prime reason for the modest increase in the defence budget is economic

slowdown and the governments determination to contain the fiscal deficit. As theEconomic

Survey 2012-13, presented to the Parliament a day before the Union Budgets presentation,

shows, the Indian economy is expected to grow at a decadal low of five per cent in thecurrent fiscal year (down from the peak of 9.3 per cent in 2010-11), before increasing to 6.1

to 6.7 per cent in the coming fiscal. At this growth rate, the governments revenue receipts

have come under sharp pressure, forcing it to tighten its purse. The austerity drive has further

been necessitated by a widening fiscal deficit, which has fuelled concerns among investors

with rating agencies seemingly inclined to reduce India to junk status. The fear of the

downgrade was so intense that the Finance Minister has not only downwardly revised the

current years expenditure to contain the fiscal deficit at 5.2 per cent of GDP but has gone a

step further to reduce the deficit level to 4.8 per cent in the coming fiscal year. Moreover, he

has also laid down a fiscal consolidation path whereby the fiscal deficit is to be reduced by0.6 percentage point every year till it becomes three per cent of the GDP in 2016-17.

However, the larger question is how much burden the defence budget has taken to

accommodate the governments austerity drive. From a macro point of view, it is reasonable

to assume that the fiscal burden, in terms of controlled growth of total government

expenditure, is shared more or less equally by each and every sector. But as the statistics

would show, the defence budget has taken a larger burden than would probably be

reasonable. This is evident from the growth rate of both the union budget and the defence

budget. While the former has increased by 11.7 per cent, the increase in the latter is less than

half of that. In other words, the defence budget has been harshly controlled not only in the

7/27/2019 Eco Project 2014

7/7

interest of the larger fiscal deficit, but to accommodate the relatively larger shares of other

government expenditure heads.

Conclusion:-

This is not the first time that the defence budget has been subject to a modest growth. In

2010-11 also, the budget was hiked by a mere four per cent. However, in that year, the actual

expenditure surpassed the budgetary allocation by five per cent, and the next year saw a hefty

12 per cent increase in allocation. Going by this, the defence ministry would not only eye for

additional resources over the budgetary allocation of 2013-14 but also expect a double-digit

hike in 2014-15. However, this expectation may bump into one crucial hurdle. Unlike the

previous years in which the Indian economy was on a high growth trajectory, reaching a GDP

growth of 9.3 per cent in 2010-11, growth in the coming years is not that encouragingalthough some improvement is expected. As the International Monetary Fund in its October

2012 report predicts, the best that the Indian economy can achieve in the years up to 2017 is

6.9 per cent. A GDP growth of less than seven per cent combined with the fiscal

consolidation path that the Finance Minister has articulated in his budget speech means a lot

of pressure on the defence ministry whose plan for current and future expenditure up to 2017

is based on past GDP growth rate of 8 to 9 per cent. Given this, a mismatch of huge

proportions is expected in the coming years between the allocation to and expectation by the

defence ministry. One of the paths that the Ministry of Defence is now expected to take is to

rework its future expenditure based on the current reality. This would mean a bit of

reprioritisation of its main items of expenditure.

Rank Country Spending ($) % of GDPYear of

data

8t India 47,735,000,000 2.5% 2012

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Armed_Forceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Armed_Forceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Armed_Forces