ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and...

43
ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign [email protected]

Transcript of ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and...

Page 1: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems

Lecture 14: Power Flow

Prof. Tom Overbye

Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

[email protected]

Page 2: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Announcements

• Power flow is only covered in lecture; not in the book• No quiz today• HW 6 is posted on the website and is due on Thursday

March 19. HW 6 must be turned in and will count the same as a quiz. There will be no quiz on March 19.

• Start Reading Chapter 4 (The Solar Resource)

2

Page 3: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Bus Admittance Matrix or Ybus

• First step in solving the power flow is to create what is known as the bus admittance matrix, often call the Ybus.

• The Ybus gives the relationships between all the bus current injections, I, and all the bus voltages, V,

I = Ybus V

• The Ybus is developed by applying KCL at each bus in the system to relate the bus current injections, the bus voltages, and the branch impedances and admittances

3

Page 4: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Ybus Example

Determine the bus admittance matrix for the network

shown below, assuming the current injection at each

bus i is Ii = IGi - IDi where IGi is the current injection into the bus from the generator and IDi is the current flowing into the load

4

Page 5: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Ybus Example, cont’d

1 1 1

1 2 1 31 12 13

1 1 2 1 3 j

1 2 3

2 21 23 24

1 2 3 4

By KCL at bus 1 we have

1( ) ( ) (with Y )

( )

Similarly

( )

G D

A B

A Bj

A B A B

A A C D C D

I I I

V V V VI I I

Z Z

I V V Y V V YZ

Y Y V Y V Y V

I I I I

Y V Y Y Y V Y V Y V

5

Page 6: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Ybus Example, cont’d

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

We can get similar relationships for buses 3 and 4

The results can then be expressed in matrix form

0

0

0 0

bus

A B A B

A A C D C D

B C B C

D D

I Y Y Y Y V

I Y Y Y Y Y Y V

I Y Y Y Y V

I Y Y V

I Y V

For a system with n buses, Ybus is an n by n

symmetric matrix (i.e., one where Aij = Aji)

6

Page 7: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Ybus General Form

•The diagonal terms, Yii, are the self admittance terms, equal to the sum of the admittances of all devices incident to bus i.

•The off-diagonal terms, Yij, are equal to the negative of the sum of the admittances joining the two buses.•With large systems Ybus is a sparse matrix (that is, most entries are zero)

7

Page 8: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Power Flow Analysis

• When analyzing power systems we know neither the complex bus voltages nor the complex current injections

• Rather, we know the complex power being consumed by the load, and the power being injected by the generators plus their voltage magnitudes

• Therefore we can not directly use the Ybus equations, but rather must use the power balance equations

8

Page 9: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Power Flow Slack Bus

• We can not arbitrarily specify S at all buses because total generation must equal total load + total losses

• We also need an angle reference bus.• To solve these problems we define one bus as the

"slack" bus. This bus has a fixed voltage magnitude and angle, and a varying real/reactive power injection.

• A “slack bus” does not exist in the real power system.

9

Page 10: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Power Balance Equations

1

bus

1

From KCL we know at each bus i in an n bus system

the current injection, , must be equal to the current

that flows into the network

Since = we also know

i

n

i Gi Di ikk

n

i Gi Di ik kk

I

I I I I

I I I Y V

I Y V

*iThe network power injection is then S i iV I

10

Page 11: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Power Balance Equations, cont’d

** * *

i1 1

S

This is an equation with complex numbers.

Sometimes we would like an equivalent set of real

power equations. These can be derived by defining

n n

i i i ik k i ik kk k

ik ik ik

i

V I V Y V V Y V

Y G jB

V

jRecall e cos sin

iji i i

ik i k

V e V

j

11

Page 12: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Real Power Balance Equations

* *i

1 1

1

i1

i1

S ( )

(cos sin )( )

Resolving into the real and imaginary parts

P ( cos sin )

Q ( sin cos

ikn n

ji i i ik k i k ik ik

k k

n

i k ik ik ik ikk

n

i k ik ik ik ik Gi Dik

n

i k ik ik ik ik

P jQ V Y V V V e G jB

V V j G jB

V V G B P P

V V G B

)k Gi DiQ Q

12

Page 13: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Newton-Raphson Method (scalar)

( )

( ) ( )

( )( ) ( )

2 ( ) 2( )2

1. For each guess of , , define ˆ

2. Represent ( ) by a Taylor series about ( )ˆ

( )( ) ( )ˆ

1 ( )higher order terms

2

v

v v

vv v

vv

x x

x x x

f x f x

df xf x f x x

dx

d f xx

dx

General form of problem: Find an x such that

( ) 0ˆf x

13

Page 14: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Newton-Raphson Method, cont’d

( )( ) ( )

( )

1( )( ) ( )

3. Approximate ( ) by neglecting all terms ˆ

except the first two

( )( ) 0 ( )ˆ

4. Use this linear approximation to solve for

( )( )

5. Solve for a new estim

vv v

v

vv v

f x

df xf x f x x

dx

x

df xx f x

dx

( 1) ( ) ( )

ate of x̂v v vx x x

14

Page 15: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Newton-Raphson Example

2

1( )( ) ( )

( ) ( ) 2( )

( 1) ( ) ( )

( 1) ( ) ( ) 2( )

Use Newton-Raphson to solve ( ) - 2 0

The equation we must iteratively solve is

( )( )

1(( ) - 2)

2

1(( ) - 2)

2

vv v

v vv

v v v

v v vv

f x x

df xx f x

dx

x xx

x x x

x x xx

15

Page 16: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Newton-Raphson Example, cont’d

( 1) ( ) ( ) 2( )

(0)

( ) ( ) ( )

3 3

6

1(( ) - 2)

2

Guess x 1. Iteratively solving we get

v ( )

0 1 1 0.5

1 1.5 0.25 0.08333

2 1.41667 6.953 10 2.454 10

3 1.41422 6.024 10

v v vv

v v v

x x xx

x f x x

16

Page 17: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Newton-Raphson Comments

• When close to the solution the error decreases quite quickly -- method has quadratic convergence

• f(x(v)) is known as the mismatch, which we would like to drive to zero

• Stopping criteria is when f(x(v)) < • Results are dependent upon the initial guess. What

if we had guessed x(0) = 0, or x (0) = -1?• A solution’s region of attraction (ROA) is the set of

initial guesses that converge to the particular solution. The ROA is often hard to determine

17

Page 18: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Multi-Variable Newton-Raphson

1 1

2 2

Next we generalize to the case where is an n-

dimension vector, and ( ) is an n-dimension function

( )

( )( )

( )

Again define the solution so ( ) 0 andˆ ˆn n

x f

x f

x f

x

f x

x

xx f x

x

x f x

x

ˆ x x

18

Page 19: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Multi-Variable Case, cont’d

i

1 11 1 1 2

1 2

1

n nn n 1 2

1 2

n

The Taylor series expansion is written for each f ( )

f ( ) f ( )f ( ) f ( )ˆ

f ( )higher order terms

f ( ) f ( )f ( ) f ( )ˆ

f ( )higher order terms

nn

nn

x xx x

xx

x xx x

xx

x

x xx x

x

x xx x

x

19

Page 20: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Multi-Variable Case, cont’d

1 1 1

1 21 1

2 2 22 2

1 2

1 2

This can be written more compactly in matrix form

( ) ( ) ( )

( )( ) ( ) ( )

( )( )ˆ

( )( ) ( ) ( )

n

n

nn n n

n

f f fx x x

f xf f f

f xx x x

ff f fx x x

x x x

xx x x

xf x

xx x x

higher order terms

nx

20

Page 21: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Jacobian Matrix

1 1 1

1 2

2 2 2

1 2

1 2

The n by n matrix of partial derivatives is known

as the Jacobian matrix, ( )

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( )

( )

( ) ( ) ( )

n

n

n n n

n

f f fx x x

f f fx x x

f f fx x x

J x

x x x

x x x

J x

x x x

21

Page 22: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Multi-Variable N-R Procedure

1

( 1) ( ) ( )

( 1) ( ) ( ) 1 ( )

( )

Derivation of N-R method is similar to the scalar case

( ) ( ) ( ) higher order termsˆ

( ) 0 ( ) ( )ˆ

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

Iterate until ( )

v v v

v v v v

v

f x f x J x x

f x f x J x x

x J x f x

x x x

x x J x f x

f x

22

Page 23: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Multi-Variable Example

1

2

2 21 1 2

2 22 1 2 1 2

1 1

1 2

2 2

1 2

xSolve for = such that ( ) 0 where

x

f ( ) 2 8 0

f ( ) 4 0

First symbolically determine the Jacobian

f ( ) f ( )

( ) =f ( ) f ( )

x x

x x x x

x x

x x

x f x

x

x

x x

J xx x

23

Page 24: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Multi-variable Example, cont’d

1 2

1 2 1 2

11 1 2 1

2 1 2 1 2 2

(0)

1(1)

4 2( ) =

2 2

Then

4 2 ( )

2 2 ( )

1Arbitrarily guess

1

1 4 2 5 2.1

1 3 1 3 1.3

x x

x x x x

x x x f

x x x x x f

J x

x

x

x

x

24

Page 25: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Multi-variable Example, cont’d

1(2)

(2)

2.1 8.40 2.60 2.51 1.8284

1.3 5.50 0.50 1.45 1.2122

Each iteration we check ( ) to see if it is below our

specified tolerance

0.1556( )

0.0900

If = 0.2 then we wou

x

f x

f x

ld be done. Otherwise we'd

continue iterating.

25

Page 26: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Newton-Raphson Power Flow

i1

In the Newton-Raphson power flow we use Newton's

method to determine the voltage magnitude and angle

at each bus in the power system.

We need to solve the power balance equations

P ( cosn

i k ik ikk

V V G

i1

sin )

Q ( sin cos )

ik ik Gi Di

n

i k ik ik ik ik Gi Dik

B P P

V V G B Q Q

Page 27: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Power Flow Variables

2 2 2

n

2

Assume the slack bus is the first bus (with a fixed

voltage angle/magnitude). We then need to determine

the voltage angle/magnitude at the other buses.

( )

( )

G

n

P P

V

V

x

x f x

2

2 2 2

( )

( )

( )

D

n Gn Dn

G D

n Gn Dn

P

P P P

Q Q Q

Q Q Q

x

x

x

Page 28: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

N-R Power Flow Solution

( )

( )

( 1) ( ) ( ) 1 ( )

The power flow is solved using the same procedure

discussed last time:

Set 0; make an initial guess of ,

While ( ) Do

( ) ( )

1

End While

v

v

v v v v

v

v v

x x

f x

x x J x f x

Page 29: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Power Flow Jacobian Matrix

1 1 1

1 2

2 2 2

1 2

1 2

The most difficult part of the algorithm is determining

and inverting the n by n Jacobian matrix, ( )

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( )

( )

( ) ( ) ( )

n

n

n n n

n

f f fx x x

f f fx x x

f f fx x x

J x

x x x

x x x

J x

x x x

Page 30: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Power Flow Jacobian Matrix, cont’d

i

i

i1

Jacobian elements are calculated by differentiating

each function, f ( ), with respect to each variable.

For example, if f ( ) is the bus i real power equation

f ( ) ( cos sin )n

i k ik ik ik ik Gik

x V V G B P P

x

x

i

1

i

f ( )( sin cos )

f ( )( sin cos ) ( )

Di

n

i k ik ik ik iki k

k i

i j ik ik ik ikj

xV V G B

xV V G B j i

Page 31: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Two Bus Newton-Raphson Example

Line Z = 0.1j

One Two 1.000 pu 1.000 pu

200 MW 100 MVR

0 MW 0 MVR

For the two bus power system shown below, use the

Newton-Raphson power flow to determine the

voltage magnitude and angle at bus two. Assume

that bus one is the slack and SBase = 100 MVA.

2

2

10 10

10 10busj j

V j j

x Y

Page 32: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Two Bus Example, cont’d

i1

i1

2 1 2

22 1 2 2

General power balance equations

P ( cos sin )

Q ( sin cos )

Bus two power balance equations

(10sin ) 2.0 0

( 10cos ) (10) 1.0 0

n

i k ik ik ik ik Gi Dik

n

i k ik ik ik ik Gi Dik

V V G B P P

V V G B Q Q

V V

V V V

Page 33: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Two Bus Example, cont’d

2 2 2

22 2 2 2

2 2

2 2

2 2

2 2

2 2 2

2 2 2 2

P ( ) (10sin ) 2.0 0

( ) ( 10cos ) (10) 1.0 0

Now calculate the power flow Jacobian

P ( ) P ( )

( )Q ( ) Q ( )

10 cos 10sin

10 sin 10cos 20

V

Q V V

VJ

V

V

V V

x

x

x x

xx x

Page 34: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Two Bus Example, First Iteration

(0)

2 2(0)2

2 2 2

2 2 2(0)

2 2 2 2

(1)

0Set 0, guess

1

Calculate

(10sin ) 2.0 2.0f( )

1.0( 10cos ) (10) 1.0

10 cos 10sin 10 0( )

10 sin 10cos 20 0 10

0 10 0Solve

1 0 10

v

V

V V

V

V V

x

x

J x

x1 2.0 0.2

1.0 0.9

Page 35: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Two Bus Example, Next Iterations

(1)2

(1)

1(2)

0.9(10sin( 0.2)) 2.0 0.212f( )

0.2790.9( 10cos( 0.2)) 0.9 10 1.0

8.82 1.986( )

1.788 8.199

0.2 8.82 1.986 0.212 0.233

0.9 1.788 8.199 0.279 0.8586

f(

x

J x

x

(2) (3)

(3)2

0.0145 0.236)

0.0190 0.8554

0.0000906f( ) Done! V 0.8554 13.52

0.0001175

x x

x

Page 36: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Two Bus Solved Values

Line Z = 0.1j

One Two 1.000 pu 0.855 pu

200 MW 100 MVR

200.0 MW168.3 MVR

-13.522 Deg

200.0 MW 168.3 MVR

-200.0 MW-100.0 MVR

Once the voltage angle and magnitude at bus 2 are

known we can calculate all the other system values,

such as the line flows and the generator reactive

power output

Page 37: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

PV Buses

• Since the voltage magnitude at PV buses is fixed there is no need to explicitly include these voltages in x or write the reactive power balance equations– the reactive power output of the generator varies to

maintain the fixed terminal voltage (within limits)– optionally these variations/equations can be included by

just writing the explicit voltage constraint for the generator bus

|Vi | – Vi setpoint = 0

Page 38: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Three Bus PV Case Example

Line Z = 0.1j

Line Z = 0.1j Line Z = 0.1j

One Two 1.000 pu 0.941 pu

200 MW 100 MVR

170.0 MW 68.2 MVR

-7.469 Deg

Three 1.000 pu

30 MW 63 MVR

2 2 2 2

3 3 3 3

2 2 2

For this three bus case we have

( )

( ) ( ) 0

V ( )

G D

G D

D

P P P

P P P

Q Q

x

x f x x

x

Page 39: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Solving Large Power Systems

• The most difficult computational task is inverting the Jacobian matrix– inverting a full matrix is an order n3 operation, meaning

the amount of computation increases with the cube of the size size

– this amount of computation can be decreased substantially by recognizing that since the Ybus is a sparse matrix, the Jacobian is also a sparse matrix

– using sparse matrix methods results in a computational order of about n1.5.

– this is a substantial savings when solving systems with tens of thousands of buses

Page 40: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

40 Bus Power Flow Example

slack

Island Electric Company (IEC)

350 MW

505 MW

396 MW

268 MW 128 Mvar

115 MW 25 Mvar

150 MW 70 Mvar

110 MW 30 Mvar

150 MW 39 Mvar

60 MW 15 Mvar

55 MW 15 Mvar

130 MW 30 Mvar

175 MW 40 Mvar

140 MW 32 Mvar 176 MW

15 Mvar

165 MW 30 Mvar

132 MW

15 Mvar

160 MW

35 Mvar

112 MW 40 Mvar

200 MW 60 Mvar

95 MW

23 Mvar

75 MW 15 Mvar

198 MW 35 Mvar

87 MW 19 Mvar

161 MW

21 Mvar

135 MW 20 Mvar

140 MW 20 Mvar

88 MW 11 Mvar

130 MW 45 Mvar

128 MW

28 Mvar

45%

22%

33%

35%

4%

13%

23%

14%

13%

28%

35%

8%

17%

13%

57%

28%

6%

3%

6%

16%

30%

22%

10%

27%

12%

30%

44%

9%

5%

46%

78%

45%

53%

47%

19%

900 MW

70 Mvar

51 Mvar

78 Mvar

47%

3%

10%

19%

16%

22%

48%

RobinEagle

Rook

SparrowBluebird

Hawk

Parrot

Turkey

Mallard

Condor

Hen

Dove

Piper

Cardinal

24%

1120 MW

2%

2%

29%

8%

36%

7%

18%

7%

11%

24%

17%

38% 39%

30%

7%

78%

14%

83 Mvar

300 MWSystem Losses: 35.22 MW

0.000 pu

NewWind

0 MW

56 Mvar

0.996 pu

1.018 pu

1.018 pu

1.015 pu

1.019 pu

1.015 pu

1.002 pu

0.997 pu

0.996 pu

1.004 pu

0.988 pu

1.001 pu

1.010 pu

1.020 pu

0.999 pu

0.989 pu

0.993 pu

0.996 pu

1.014 pu0.993 pu

1.010 pu

1.015 pu

1.023 pu

1.015 pu

1.010 pu1.006 pu

0.999 pu

1.018 pu1.020 pu

0.993 pu

1.012 pu

1.013 pu

0.992 pu

0.991 pu

1.005 pu

1.014 pu

1.015 pu0.994 pu

1.025 pu

57 Mvar

Ostrich

Crow

Peacock

Lark Finch

Oriole

Heron

Finch

Owl

Woodpecker

Pheasant

Canary

Flamingo

Page 41: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Good Power System Operation

• Good power system operation requires that there be no reliability violations for either the current condition or in the event of statistically likely contingencies• Reliability requires as a minimum that there be no transmission

line/transformer limit violations and that bus voltages be within acceptable limits (perhaps 0.95 to 1.08)

• Example contingencies are the loss of any single device. This is known as n-1 reliability.

• North American Electric Reliability Corporation now has legal authority to enforce reliability standards (and there are now lots of them). See http://www.nerc.com for details (click on Standards)

Page 42: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Looking at the Impact of Line and Transformer Outages

slack

Island Electric Company (IEC)

350 MW

505 MW

398 MW

268 MW 128 Mvar

115 MW 25 Mvar

150 MW 70 Mvar

110 MW 30 Mvar

150 MW 39 Mvar

60 MW 15 Mvar

55 MW 15 Mvar

130 MW 30 Mvar

175 MW 40 Mvar

140 MW 32 Mvar 176 MW

15 Mvar

165 MW 30 Mvar

132 MW

15 Mvar

160 MW

35 Mvar

112 MW 40 Mvar

200 MW 60 Mvar

95 MW

23 Mvar

75 MW 15 Mvar

198 MW 35 Mvar

87 MW 19 Mvar

161 MW

21 Mvar

135 MW 20 Mvar

140 MW 20 Mvar

88 MW 11 Mvar

130 MW 45 Mvar

128 MW

28 Mvar

49%

23%

37%

37%

8%

15%

25%

16%

13%

30%

37%

9%

19%

13%

62%

31%

7%

9%

3%

17%

32%

32%

16%

32%

13%

30%

43%

9%

5%

45%

46%

52%

42%

19%

900 MW

68 Mvar

51 Mvar

78 Mvar

40%

4%

12%

20%

9%

20%

41%

RobinEagle

Rook

SparrowBluebird

Hawk

Parrot

Turkey

Mallard

Condor

Hen

Dove

Piper

Cardinal

23%

1120 MW

6%

3%

29%

9%

41%

8%

23%

4%

2%

24%

16%

39% 39%

33%

11%

15%

83 Mvar

300 MWSystem Losses: 37.50 MW

0.000 pu

NewWind

0 MW

56 Mvar

0.988 pu

1.014 pu

1.014 pu

1.015 pu

1.016 pu

1.011 pu

0.996 pu

0.987 pu

0.982 pu

0.990 pu

0.974 pu

0.988 pu

0.994 pu

1.020 pu

0.986 pu

0.983 pu

0.990 pu

0.993 pu

1.011 pu0.991 pu

1.009 pu

1.013 pu

1.022 pu

1.015 pu

1.010 pu1.006 pu

0.999 pu

1.018 pu1.020 pu

0.992 pu

1.011 pu

1.013 pu

0.991 pu

0.990 pu

1.003 pu

1.011 pu

1.015 pu0.991 pu

1.025 pu

57 Mvar

Ostrich

Crow

Peacock

Lark Finch

Oriole

Heron

Finch

Owl

Woodpecker

Pheasant

Canary

Flamingo

139%

Page 43: ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

40 Bus Example: New Wind Generation

43

slack

Island Electric Company (IEC)

350 MW

505 MW

-110 MW

268 MW 128 Mvar

115 MW 25 Mvar

150 MW 70 Mvar

110 MW 30 Mvar

150 MW 39 Mvar

59 MW 15 Mvar

55 MW 15 Mvar

130 MW 30 Mvar

175 MW 40 Mvar

140 MW 32 Mvar 176 MW

15 Mvar

165 MW 30 Mvar

132 MW

15 Mvar

160 MW

35 Mvar

112 MW 40 Mvar

200 MW 60 Mvar

95 MW

23 Mvar

75 MW 15 Mvar

198 MW 35 Mvar

87 MW 19 Mvar

161 MW

21 Mvar

135 MW 20 Mvar

140 MW 20 Mvar

88 MW 11 Mvar

130 MW 45 Mvar

128 MW

28 Mvar

30%

15%

54%

36%

11%

5%

13%

14%

13%

45%

15%

11%

8%

16%

47%

28%

52%

30%

27%

26%

28%

17%

8%

24%

9%

29%

45%

12%

4%

53%

71%

44%

54%

40%

10%

900 MW

62 Mvar

49 Mvar

76 Mvar

42%

5%

30%

10%

70%

23%

43%

RobinEagle

Rook

SparrowBluebird

Hawk

Parrot

Turkey

Mallard

Condor

Hen

Dove

Piper

Cardinal

35%

1120 MW

9%

1%

27%

6%

35%

11%

11%

19%

35%

31%

36% 36%

33%

13%

71%

14%

83 Mvar

300 MWSystem Losses: 129.92 MW

0.657 pu

NewWind

600 MW

55 Mvar

0.653 pu

0.850 pu

0.907 pu

1.012 pu

0.953 pu

0.947 pu

0.885 pu

0.843 pu

0.933 pu

0.941 pu

0.925 pu

0.940 pu

0.983 pu

1.020 pu

0.942 pu

0.944 pu

0.952 pu

0.955 pu

0.973 pu0.973 pu

1.004 pu

0.998 pu

1.009 pu

1.012 pu

1.010 pu1.005 pu

0.997 pu

1.017 pu1.020 pu

0.987 pu

1.004 pu

1.012 pu

0.987 pu

0.985 pu

0.997 pu

0.989 pu

1.015 pu0.956 pu

1.025 pu

40 Mvar

Ostrich

Crow

Peacock

Lark Finch

Oriole

Heron

Finch

Owl

Woodpecker

Pheasant

Canary

Flamingo

131%