ECampus webmøter diskusjonsnotat webmøter diskusjonsnotat Jan Meijer 21 April 2010 eCampus...
-
Upload
savion-wittie -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of ECampus webmøter diskusjonsnotat webmøter diskusjonsnotat Jan Meijer 21 April 2010 eCampus...
eCampus webmøter diskusjonsnotat
http://blog.ecampus.no/
Jan Meijer21 April 2010
eCampus arbeidsgruppemøtephoto by Henrik Thorburn
eCampusgoal
3 scenarios
different needs, different toolsmeetings lecture ad hoc collab
Use staff meetings net-based teaching study group, project meetings, askeskymøter
User group staff lecturer, students everyone
# Participants 5-10, max 20 15-40, max 100 2-7, max 20
Equipment control yes no none, heterogeneous
Collab duration permanent semester day/short/project
Planning horizon days, months medium
weeks, semesterlong
day/projectshort
User’s platform MS MS, Mac, Mobile?, Linux?
MS, Mac(++), Mobile?, Linux
Current use some some courses little systematic use
many roads to salvation
AdobeConnect
GoTo MeetingNefsis
DimDim
Elluminate
Tandberg Movi
Microsoft OCS
NTR MeetingWebEx
BeamYourScreen
MegaMeeting ?AviCom
13:00
Friday, 16 April 2010
3 5 20 50 100+
Adobe Acrobat.com
free $149* $390
DimDim free** $300 $900 (1000)
NTRmeeting 3590 4490 7050 8490 (100)
Skype free free free free
* $149 = NOK 889 **with less functionality
prices are annual
use our rooms?
• Adobe Connect (20)• DimDim (50)• NTRmeeting (50)
[email protected] Ingrid, Jan, Magnus
What to do?
thought 1: It’s there!
teach, train, change mentality
GET IT USED
The challenge is NOT technological
thought 2: It could be better
300.000 room admins?Feide login?
Take out recordings?
STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP
what do YOU think?
• the previous?
• the assumptions?• the open questions?• the sketched options?
the suggested next steps?
Open questions (1)
• Q1: Who’s currently using what?• Q2: Who’s investigating?• Q3: When? Fall 2010? December 2010? • Q4: Scenarios correct?• Q5: Assumptions
– a) Platform support importance: • MS, Mac, Linux?, Mobile platforms?
– b) Good enough beats tight integration?– c) Meetings initiated from within institution?– d) Outside persons MUST be able to join
• Q6: Other assumptions correct?
Open questions (2)
• Q7: How many rooms needed?• Q8: Logical intervals for Max.
#attendees/room• Q9: Which licensing model is realistic?
– # rooms?– # rooms + #max users/room?– # concurrent users?
Possible options
• Do nothing• Increase competence and skills• Document common requirements• Market reconnaissance• Sector wide (framework) agreement• Open services• Establish shared solution for sector
– Services of other NRENs– UNINETT service– Open source based pilot service– Extending open services
Suggested next steps
1. Establish eCampus working group1. publish recommendations on audio2. publish common web conferencing reqs3. Market reconnaissance
• functionality• licensing models/costs• open services
4. Reach consensus on sector wide solutions