EC400 Problem Sets

7
LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Professor Leonardo Felli Department of Economics S.478; x7525 EC400 2010/11 Math for Microeconomics September Course, Part II Problem Set 1 1. Show that the general quadratic form of a 11 x 2 1 + a 12 x 1 x 2 + a 22 x 2 2 can be written as ( x 1 x 2 ) a 11 a 12 0 a 22 ! x 1 x 2 ! . 2. List all the principal minors of a general (3 × 3) matrix and denote which are the three leading principal submatrices. 3. Let C = 0 0 0 c ! , and determine the definiteness of C. 4. Determine the definiteness of the following symmetric matrices: a) 2 -1 -1 1 ! b) -3 4 4 -6 ! c) 1 2 0 2 4 5 0 5 6 5. Approximate e x at x = 0 with a Taylor polynomial of order three and four. Then compute the values of these approximation at h = .2 and at h = 1 and compare with the actual values.

description

Problem set use by the London School of economics during the September preparation. For those who want to do some extra studying. Good Luck.

Transcript of EC400 Problem Sets

Page 1: EC400 Problem Sets

LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Professor Leonardo Felli

Department of Economics S.478; x7525

EC400 2010/11

Math for Microeconomics

September Course, Part II

Problem Set 1

1. Show that the general quadratic form of

a11x21 + a12x1x2 + a22x

22

can be written as ( x1 x2 )

(a11 a12

0 a22

)(x1

x2

).

2. List all the principal minors of a general (3 × 3) matrix and denote which are the

three leading principal submatrices.

3. Let C =

(0 0

0 c

), and determine the definiteness of C.

4. Determine the definiteness of the following symmetric matrices:

a)

(2 −1

−1 1

)b)

(−3 4

4 −6

)c)

1 2 0

2 4 5

0 5 6

5. Approximate ex at x = 0 with a Taylor polynomial of order three and four. Then

compute the values of these approximation at h = .2 and at h = 1 and compare with

the actual values.

Page 2: EC400 Problem Sets

LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Professor Leonardo Felli

Department of Economics S.478; x7525

EC400 2010/11

Math for Microeconomics

September Course, Part II

Problem Set 2

1. For each of the following functions, find the critical points and classify these as local

max, local min, or ‘can’t tell’:

a) x4 + x2 − 6xy + 3y2,

b) x2 − 6xy + 2y2 + 10x + 2y − 5

c) xy2 + x3y − xy

2. Let S ⊂ Rn be an open set and f : S → R be a twice differentiable function.

Suppose that Df(x∗) = 0. State the weakest sufficient conditions the relevant points,

corresponding to the Hessian of f must, satisfy for:

(i) x∗ to be a local max.

(ii) x∗ to be a strict local min.

3. Which of the critical points found in Problem 1 are also global maxima or global

minima?

4. Check whether f(x, y) = x4 + x2y2 + y4 − 3x − 8y is concave or convex using its

Hessian.

2

Page 3: EC400 Problem Sets

LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Professor Leonardo Felli

Department of Economics S.478; x7525

EC400 2010/11

Math for Microeconomics

September Course, Part II

Problem Set 3

1. A commonly used production or utility function is f(x, y) = xy. Check whether it

is concave or convex using its Hessian.

2. Prove that the sum of two concave functions is a concave function as well.

3. Let f be a function defined on a convex set U in Rn. Prove that the following

statements are equivalent:

(i) f is a quasiconcave function on U

(ii) For all x,y ∈ U and t ∈ [0, 1],

f(x) ≥ f(y)⇒ f(tx + (1− t)y) ≥ f(y)

(iii) For all x,y ∈ U and t ∈ [0, 1],

f(tx + (1− t)y) ≥ min{f(x), f(y)}

4. State the corresponding theorem for quasiconvex functions.

5. For each of the following functions on R1, determine whether they are quasiconcave,

quasiconvex, both, or neither:

a) ex; b) ln x; c) x3 − x.

3

Page 4: EC400 Problem Sets

LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Professor Leonardo Felli

Department of Economics S.478; x7525

EC400 2010/11

Math for Microeconomics

September Course, Part II

Problem Set 4

1. For the following program

minx

f(x) = x

subject to

−(x2) ≥ 0,

find the optimal solution.

2. Solve the following problem:

maxx1,x2

f(x1, x2) = x21x2

subject to

2x21 + x2

2 = 3.

3. Solve the following problem:

maxx,y

x2 + y2

subject to

ax + y = 1

when a ∈ [12, 32].

4

Page 5: EC400 Problem Sets

4. Consider the following problem:

maxx

f(x)

subject to

g(x) ≤ a

x ∈ X

Let X be a convex subset of Rn, f : X → R a concave function, g : X → Rm a convex

function, a is a vector in Rm. What is the Largrangian for this problem? prove it is

a concave function of the choice variable x on X.

5

Page 6: EC400 Problem Sets

LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Professor Leonardo Felli

Department of Economics S.478; x7525

EC400 2010/11

Math for Microeconomics

September Course, Part II

Problem Set 5

1. Assume that the utility function of the consumer is

u(x, y) = x +√y

The consumer has a positive income I > 0 and faces positive prices px > 0, py > 0.

The consumer cannot buy negative amounts of any of the goods.

a) Use Kuhn-Tucker to solve the consumer’s problem.

b) Show how the optimal value of u∗,depends on I.

2. Solve the following problem:

max(min{x, y} − x2 − y2)

6

Page 7: EC400 Problem Sets

LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Professor Leonardo Felli

Department of Economics S.478; x7525

EC400 2010/11

Math for Microeconomics

September Course, Part II

Problem Set 6

1. Consider the problem of maximizing xyz subject to x + y + z ≤ 1, x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0

and z ≥ 0. Obviously, the three latter constraints do not bind, and we can then

concentrate only on the first constraint (x + y + z ≤ 1). Find the solution and the

Lagrange multiplier, and show how the optimal value would change if instead the

constraint is x + y + z ≤ .9.

2. Consider the problem of maximizing xy subject to x2 + ay2 ≤ 1. What happens to

the optimal value when we change a = 1 to a = 1.1?

3. Consider Problem 1 in Problem set 5. Set the first order conditions, and for the

case of an interior solution use comparative statics to find changes in the endogenous

variables when I and px change (one at a time), i.e., find

(i)∂x

∂I,

∂y

∂I,

∂q0∂I

;

(ii)∂x

∂px,

∂y

∂px,

∂q0∂px

.

7