Eb77 Value En

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

1/46

Standard Eurobarometer 77

Spring 2012

THE VALUES OF EUROPEANS

REPORT

Fieldwork: May 2012

This survey has been requested and co-ordinated by the European Commission,

Directorate-General for Communication.

http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm

This document does not represent the point of view of the European Commission.

The interpretations and opinions contained in it are solely those of the authors.

Standard Eurobarometer 77 / Spring 2012 TNS Opinion & Social

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

2/46

0

Standard Eurobarometer 77Spring 2012

The values of Europeans

Survey conducted by TNS Opinion & Social at the

request of the European Commission,Directorate-General for Communication

Survey coordinated by the EuropeanCommission,

Directorate-General for CommunicationResearch and Speechwriting Unit

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

3/46

STANDARD EUROBAROMETER 77 VALUES OF EUROPEANS SPRING 2012

1

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 2I. THEEXISTENCEOFCOMMONEUROPEANVALUES................................................................... 4

1.

Thecloseness

of

Member

States

in

terms

of

values

..............................................................

4

2. Thecomparisonwithothercontinents................................................................................. 7II. THEVALUESSHAREDBYEUROPEANSANDTHOSETHATBESTREPRESENTTHEEUROPEAN

UNION..................................................................................................................................... 91. ThevaluessharedbyEuropeans.......................................................................................... 92. ThevaluesthatbestrepresenttheEuropeanUnion........................................................... 123. Theideaofhappiness........................................................................................................ 15

III.THEECONOMICANDSOCIALVALUESOFEUROPEANS............................................................ 18

1. Stateinterventionandfreecompetition............................................................................ 182. Equalityorindividualfreedom?......................................................................................... 253. Theseverityofthejusticesystem...................................................................................... 284. Thecontributionofimmigrantstosociety.......................................................................... 315. Economicgrowthorenvironmentalprotection?................................................................ 346. Theimportanceofleisure.................................................................................................. 38

ANNEXES

Technical specifications

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

4/46


2

INTRODUCTION

Understanding European public opinion lies partially through an analysis of the values of

Europeans. What are they? Are there shared values? What are the values attributed to

the European Union? Have they changed during the crisis? Are there divisions between

different categories?

These are the questions which we try to answer in this volume of the Eurobarometer 77

survey of spring 2012.

This Standard Eurobarometer was conducted between 12 and 27 May 2012 in 34

countries or territories1: the 27 Member States of the European Union, the six candidate

countries (Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Turkey, Iceland,

Montenegro and Serbia), and in the Turkish Cypriot Community in the part of the country

that is not controlled by the government of the Republic of Cyprus.

The analysis of the values of Europeans is conducted from different angles:

- The closeness of Member States in terms of values: Are values sharedbetween the Member States? Are they shared more closely than on other

continents?

- The values that count the most and which are best embodied by theEuropean Union: What are the values that matter most to Europeans? Which

best represent their idea of happiness? What values do they attribute to the EU?

Are these personal and European values consistent?

- The economic and social values of Europeans, and how they arechanging: How do they perceive state intervention? How does this relate to free

competition? Do they give precedence to equality or to freedom? Is the justice

system sufficiently severe? How do the public see the contribution of immigrantsto society? Which takes priority, the environment or growth? And lastly, what is

the place of leisure as opposed to work?

The full Standard Eurobarometer report comprises several volumes. The first volume

analyses the results for the trend indicators of the Standard Eurobarometer. Four other

volumes present European public opinion on other topics: the economic and financial

crisis; the Europe 2020 strategy; European citizenship; values. The present volume

considers the values of Europeans.

The general analysis and the socio-demographic analyses are based on the average

results for the 27 Member States. This average has been weighted to reflect the actualpopulation of each Member State. The averages for previous years represent the results

obtained in all the Member States of the European Union as it was composed at the time

of the survey.

* * * * *

1Please refer to the technical specifications for the exact dates of the fieldwork carried out in each country

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

5/46


3

32,728 people from different social and demographic backgrounds were interviewed face

to face in their homes in their mother tongue at the request of the European

Commission. The methodology used is that of the Eurobarometer surveys conducted on

behalf of the Directorate-General for Communication (Research and Speechwriting

Unit)2. A technical note concerning the interviews carried out by the institutes within the

TNS Opinion & Social network is annexed to this report. It describes the method used for

the interviews and the confidence intervals3.

The abbreviations used in this report correspond to:

ABBREVIATIONSBE Belgium LV LatviaCZ Czech Republic LU Luxembourg

BG Bulgaria HU HungaryDK Denmark MT Malta

DE Germany NL The NetherlandsEE Estonia AT AustriaEL Greece PL Poland

ES Spain PT PortugalFR France RO RomaniaIE Ireland SI Slovenia

IT Italy SK SlovakiaCY Republic of Cyprus*** FI Finland

LT Lithuania SE SwedenUK The United Kingdom

CY

(tcc)Turkish Cypriot Community

HR Croatia EU27 European Union 27 Member StatesTR Turkey

MK Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia**** EU15 BE, IT, FR, DE, LU, NL, DK, UK, IE, PT, ES, EL, AT, SE, FI*

IS Iceland NMS12 BG, CZ, EE, CY, LT, LV, MT, HU, PL, RO, SL, SK**

ME MontenegroEurozon

eBE, FR, IT, LU, DE, AT, ES, PT, IE, NL, FI, EL, EE, SI, CY,MT, SK

RS SerbiaNon-Eurozon

e

BG, CZ, DK, LV, LT, HU, PL, RO, SE, UK

* EU15 refers to the 15 countries that formed the European Union before the 2004 and 2007 enlargements

** The NMS12 are the 12 new Member States which joined the European Union during the 2004 and 2007

enlargements

*** Cyprus as a whole is one of the 27 European Union Member States. However, the acquis communautaire

has been suspended in the part of the country which is not controlled by the government of the Republic of

Cyprus. For practical reasons, only the interviews carried out in the part of the country controlled by the

government of the Republic of Cyprus are included in the CY category and in the EU27 average. Interviews

carried out in the part of the country that is not controlled by the government of the Republic of Cyprus are

included in the CY(tcc) category (tcc: Turkish Cypriot Community).

**** Provisional abbreviation which in no way prejudges the definitive name of this country, which will be

agreed once the current negotiations at the United Nations have been completed.

* * * * *

We wish to thank the people interviewed throughout Europe

who took the time to take part in this survey.

Without their active participation, this survey would not have been possible.

2http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm3The results tables are annexed. It should be noted that the total of the percentages indicated in the tables in

this report may exceed 100% when the respondent was able to choose several answers to the same question.

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

6/46


4

I. THE EXISTENCE OF COMMON EUROPEAN VALUES- A relative majority of Europeans, unchanged since 2006, feel that EU Member

States are close in terms of values -

1. The closeness of Member States in terms of valuesA relative majority of Europeans continue

to think that, in terms of shared values,

EU Member States are close to each

other (49%, while 42% disagree). Within

this majority, 46% say that the Member

States are fairly close and 3% very

close.

This sense of closeness has declined

somewhat since this question was askedin the EB69 survey of spring 2008 (49%

now, compared with 54% then).

There are significant differences between

the NMS12 countries, in which a clear

majority of respondents say that the

Member States are close in terms of

values (59%), and the EU15 countries, where they are more measured (47%, against

45%). This feeling of closeness is also stronger in non-Euro Zone countries (53%) than

within the Euro Zone (47%, against 46%).

The impression that Member States are close in terms of shared values is the majority

view in 16 Member States, but it is particularly strong in Slovakia (70%), Poland (68%),

Bulgaria (63%) and the Czech Republic (63%). However, it is far less widespread in

Latvia (34%), Portugal (37%), France (38%) and Spain (40%).

There have also been some striking evolutions since the EB69 survey of spring 2008.

The sense that Member States are close in terms of shared values has declined by23 percentage points in Portugal (37%) and 15 points in Greece (43%), becoming

the minority position.

Though still the majority view, it has lost 16 points in Cyprus (52%). Conversely, it has gained 14 points in Austria (53%) and 6 points in Poland

(68%).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

7/46


5

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

8/46


6

This question reveals the divisions which are traditionally measured in relation to the

EuropeanUnion:

Young Europeans are more likely to see the Member States as close in terms ofvalues (56% of the 15-24 age group) than their elders (44% of people aged 55+;

this is the minority view in this group).

A majority of the most educated Europeans share this impression (54% of thosewho studied to the age of 20 or beyond), while it is the minority view among

respondents whose education ended before the age of 16 (39%).

It is also stronger among Europeans who position themselves towards the top ofthe social scale (57%) than among those who place themselves at the bottom

(42%).

Finally, it is much more widespread among respondents with a strong interest inEuropean politics (52%, vs 44% of those who take no interest).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

9/46


7

2. The comparison with other continentsAn absolute majority of Europeans

believe that, in comparison with other

continents, it is much easier to see what

Europeans have in common in terms of

values: 59% agree with this suggestion,

while 26% disagree.

This belief has lost ground since the EB69

survey of spring 2008 (-2 percentage

points; but more strikingly, there has

been a rise of +4 points for disagree).

While this is the majority position in

every Member State, this statement

receives more support in the NMS12

countries (64%) than in the EU15countries (57%).

Respondents are particularly likely to agree that common values are easier to identify in

Europe than in other continents in Cyprus (76%), Greece (72%), Slovakia (72%),

Finland (70%) and Poland (68%). However, this view is far less widespread in the

Netherlands (45%), Sweden (51%), the United Kingdom (53%) and Malta (53%).

It has lost significant ground since the EB69 survey of spring 2008 in Slovenia (60%, -13

percentage points), Romania (58%, -10) and Denmark (54%, -10). It has become more

widespread in only nine countries (Belgium, Latvia, Italy, Poland, the United Kingdom,

Cyprus, Austria, Bulgaria and Lithuania), and only to a limited extent: the greatest rises

are recorded in Bulgaria (67%, +4) and Lithuania (65%, +4).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

10/46


8

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

11/46


9

II. THE VALUES SHARED BY EUROPEANS AND THOSE THAT BESTREPRESENT THE EUROPEAN UNION

- Personal values are generally consistent with those that best represent the

European Union: peace, human rights and democracy -

1. The values shared by EuropeansAsked which values matter the most to

them, Europeans first mention human

rights (43%) and respect for human life

(43%). The former has lost ground since

the EB74 survey of Autumn 2010 (-4

percentage points), while respect for

human life is mentioned a little more often

(+2).

These two values are followed by peace

(40%), which is mentioned less often than

in autumn 2010 (-4 points).

Democracy stands fourth in the ranking of

values which matter most to Europeans

(28%, -1), followed by individual freedom

(23%, unchanged) and the rule of law

(21%, -1).

These are followed by equality (20%, +1),

solidarity (15%, unchanged) and tolerance

(15%, unchanged), ahead of self-

fulfilment (11%, +1), respect for other

cultures (9%, +1) and religion (5%, -1).

The ranking of personal values is fairly similar between the EU15 countries and the

NMS12 countries, with priority given to respect for human life, human rights and peace.

NMS12 respondents are more likely to mention individual freedom (26%, compared with

22% in the EU15), whereas EU15 respondents give preference to democracy (30%,

compared with 21% in the NMS12).

Respect for human life is the first value identified in 10 Member States, led by Ireland

(58%), Bulgaria (52%) and Romania (51%). It is also mentioned by a majority in Cyprus

(51%, in second place after human rights). It has gained significant ground since the

EB74 survey of Autumn 2010 in Lithuania (48%, +11 percentage points) and Romania

(51%, +10).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

12/46


10

Human rights lead the ranking of personal values in seven Member States. This item is

very widely mentioned in Sweden (65%), Cyprus (62%), Lithuania (51%) and Bulgaria

(51%, where it stands in second place behind respect for human life, 52%). However,

the trend for this item is downwards, with the most significant decline recorded in

Luxembourg (41%, -12 percentage points).

In Italy, these first two values, respect for human life and human rights, were mentionedequally (both 38%).

Peace isthe first personal value mentioned in seven Member States: Germany (55%),

Slovenia (51%), Luxembourg (48%), Malta (47%), Greece (46%), the Netherlands

(40%) and Slovakia (39%). It is cited much less often than in Autumn 2010 in Poland

(32%, -12 percentage points), Estonia (42%, -11) and Finland (45%, -10).

Democracy is the first value mentioned in Denmark (52%), as is individual freedom

in Austria (53%).

Other notable results include:

The rule of law is very widely mentioned in Slovenia (38%). In Portugal, equality (36%) and solidarity (26%) are both cited more than

average.

Respondents in Belgium give pride of place to tolerance (30%). Those in Romania mention self-fulfilment more than the European average

(23%).

Respect for other cultures is frequently mentioned in Luxembourg (18%). Religion is frequently mentioned in Cyprus (19%).

In the candidate countries:

The three leading personal values are also respect for human life, human rightsand peace in almost all the candidate countries.

In Serbia, where this survey was fielded for the first time, peace leads the ranking(46%).

Turkey is an exception in giving more importance to religion (27%) and individualfreedom (26%) than peace (25%), behind respect for human life (50%) and

human rights (45%).

The hierarchy of values which matter most personally varies little across the socio-

demographic categories, though there are some differences in the frequency of

mentions. However, older respondents and less educated respondents are most likely to

mention peace as their first personal value.

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

13/46


11

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

14/46


12

2. The values that best represent the European UnionInvited to say which values best

represent the European Union,

respondents mention the same values as

those which they most cherish personally.

Peace leads the ranking (39%), following

a rise since the EB74 survey of autumn

2010 (+4 percentage points). Democracy

has moved into second place, still with a

high score (37%, -1). The third value

representing the EU is human rights,

despite a slight decline (35%, -3).

These values are followed by the rule of

law (23%, -2), and respect for other

cultures (17%, -1).

Solidarity is in 6th position, but is

mentioned less than in the EB74 survey

(16%, -4).

As in the past, respect for human life, the first-ranked personal value, scores much lower

here (15%, -1), doubtless because it is seen more as a matter for individual behaviour

than for a political entity.

These values are followed by individual freedom (12%, =), equality (12%, -1), tolerance

(10%, -1), self-fulfilment (4%, =), and religion (3%, =).

EU15 respondents are more likely to mention peace (40%) as a value which embodies

the EU, while NMS12 respondents are most likely to mention democracy (38%, compared

with 34% for peace).

Peace is the value that best represents the European Union for respondents in 12

Member States. It is mentioned very frequently in Sweden (55%), Germany (53%) and

France (51%), and much more often than in Autumn 2010 in the Czech Republic (50%,

+13 percentage points) and Slovenia (50%, +12). Other countries in which peace is seen

as the value most representing the EU are Greece, Spain, Luxembourg, Hungary, Austria,

Slovakia and Finland.

Democracy is the most mentioned value in five Member States, led by Denmark (53%).

Peace and democracy jointly lead the ranking in Malta (36%) and Italy (30%).

Human rights are the first value in seven Member States, led by Belgium and Cyprus

(both 45%). This item is mentioned much less frequently than in autumn 2010 in

Luxembourg (41%, -10 percentage points) and Italy (29%, -9).

The rule of law is the first value mentioned in Ireland (34%).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

15/46


13

The decline in mentions of solidarity, touched upon above, is especially strong in

Germany (18%, -13), Portugal (13%, -10) and Sweden (21%, -9).

In the candidate countries:

The rule of law is the first value identified as representing the EU in Montenegro(56%), Iceland (41%) and Croatia (40%, equal with democracy).

In Turkey, individual freedom, which we have seen is an important personalvalue, is mentioned very often (31%) and stands in second place behind human

rights (32%).

In Serbia, democracy is the first-ranked value (36%), ahead of the rule of law(33%).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

16/46


14

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

17/46


15

3. The idea of happinessThe value which Europeans say is the most

importanttotheirhappiness ishealth(75%,

+2percentagepointssincetheEB69survey

of spring 2008), a long way ahead of the

otheritems.

It is followed by love (41%, -3), and

work (40%, +3).

Next come money (32%, =) and friendship

(28%, +1 point). Peace is in 6th place,

recording a clear decline since the EB69

surveyofspring2008(28%, 7).

This is followed by freedom (24%, =),

justice (21%, -1), pleasure (10%, =),

education (10%, -1), belief (9%, =),

order (6%, -1), tradition (6%, -1) and

solidarity (6%, =).

Health leads the list of values which most represent happiness in every Member State

except Denmark, where respondents first mentioned love (68%). Though EU15

respondents put love just after health (43%), NMS12 respondents are more likely tomention work (43%) and money (43%, with 36% for love).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

18/46


16

Work has gained significant ground in Denmark (35%, +20 percentage points), Cyprus

(44%, +16), Estonia (43%, +13), Ireland (39%, +11), Romania (37%, +11), Slovenia

(33%, +11) and the United Kingdom (23%, +10). Conversely, the score for this item has

declined fairly sharply in Luxembourg (32%, -9), Malta (36%, -7) and Germany (36%, -

6).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

19/46


17

The socio-demographic analysis reveals some nuances, though health has a massive lead

in every category:

Men put work after health (42%), while women are more likely to mention love(43%, and 39% for work).

Young people are also likely to mention love (47%) and friendship (39%), whileEuropeans aged 55+ put peace (36%) after health (81%).

The Europeans who position themselves low on the social scale put work (48%)and money (40%) before love (37%), which is the second-ranking value of those

who say they are towards the top of the social scale (48%).

Items mentioned by more than 20% of respondents

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

20/46


18

III. THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL VALUES OF EUROPEANS1. State intervention and free competition

- A majority of Europeans, albeit declining, still support free competition and

feel that the state intervenes too much in everyday life

State intervention

A majority of Europeans think that the

state intervenes too much in our lives:

64% vs. 32%. However, this proportion

has declined since the EB76.4 survey of

December 20114, slipping by four

percentage points. Less than a quarter of

Europeans now say that they totally

agree (24%, -7).

There are few differences between EU15

and NMS12 countries, or between Euro

Zone and non-Euro Zone countries, on this

question.

This is the majority opinion in 23 Member

States, and the minority view in four others: Luxembourg (63% disagree), Finland

(61%), Estonia (59%) and Sweden (51%).

4Special Eurobarometer 379, Future of Europe:http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_379_en.pdf

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

21/46


19

It is particularly strong in Portugal (86%), Greece (84%) and Slovenia (82%). However,

it has declined significantly since the previous survey in Luxembourg (34%, -19

percentage points), where it is now the minority view, and in France (55%, -14) and

Austria (56%, -12). It has gained most ground in Malta (62%, +8).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

22/46


20

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

23/46


21

Free competition

Support for the view that free competition is the best guarantee of prosperity is still very

widespread in the European Union: 65% of respondents agree, while 25% disagree. But

this view has also lost ground since the last survey (-4 percentage points).

There is majority support for thisstatement in all Member States. Support

for free competition is particularly strong

in Slovenia (80%), Lithuania (79%),

Latvia (78%), Austria (77%), Estonia

(76%) and Ireland (75%).

It has gained significant ground in

Portugal (69%, +11 percentage points)

and has declined the most in Italy (64%,

-9).

The countries where support is lowest are

France (51%), Hungary (54%) and the

Netherlands (55%).

The socio-demographic analysis reveals

no marked differences on these two questions.

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

24/46


22

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

25/46


23

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

26/46


24

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

27/46


25

2. Equality or individual freedom? Two-thirds of Europeans support more equality and justice, even if this means

less individual freedom

Two-thirds of Europeans think that we

need more equality and justice even if

this means less freedom for the

individual (66%, vs. 29% who

disagree). This proportion has changed

little since the last time this question was

asked, in the EB69 survey of spring 2008

(65%, vs. 29% who disagreed).

Support for this statement is stronger in

the NMS12 countries (72%) than in theEU15 (64%). In contrast, there is only a

marginal difference between Euro Zone

(67%) and non-Euro Zone countries

(65%).

A majority of respondents call for equality even at the expense of freedom in 25 Member

States. The feeling is particularly strong in Portugal (82%), Italy (79%), Romania (79%),

Slovenia (76%) and Bulgaria (75%). Conversely, a majority disagree in the Netherlands

(54% disagree) and Denmark (50%).

Since the EB69 survey of spring 2008, this opinion has gained significant support in

Cyprus (70%, +11), Slovenia (76%, +9) and Austria (62%, +9).

Despite the majority support in all social classes, we found that:

This idea is more appealing to respondents aged 55+ (69%) than to the youngestrespondents (61% of those aged 15-24 years).

Support is also stronger among the least educated respondents (71% of thosewhose education ended before the age of 16, compared with 63% of those who

studied until the age of 20 or beyond).

It is also a little stronger among Europeans who position themselves towards thebottom of the social scale (69%) than among those who place themselves at the

top (63%).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

28/46


26

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

29/46


27

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

30/46


28

3. The severity of the justice system- A majority say that the justice system is insufficiently severe

A very large majority of Europeans

believe that there is too much tolerancenowadays, and that criminals should be

more severely punished: 84% agree

with this statement, of which 53%

totally agree. Only 13% of Europeans

disagree. These proportions have

remained completely stable since the

last time this question was asked, in

the EB69 survey of spring 2008.

The belief that the justice system is

insufficiently severe is shared in all EUcountries. It is particularly strong in

Cyprus (96%, of which 78% totally

agree), the Czech Republic (96%),

Bulgaria (95%), Slovenia (93%), Slovakia (93%) and Greece (91%). It has also gained

significant ground in Austria (87%, +10).

There are only two countries in which fewer than three-quarters of respondents share

this belief: Denmark (65%, -3 percentage points since spring 2008) and Sweden (67%,

-10), where support has declined significantly.

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

31/46


29

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

32/46


30

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

33/46


31

4. The contribution of immigrants to society- The feeling that immigrants contribute a lot to society has gained ground and

is now the majority view - but opinions are still very divided

The feeling that immigrants

contribute a lot to their host

country is shared by 49% of

respondents, while 43% disagree.

It has gained significant ground

since the EB69 survey of spring

2008 (+5) and has even become

the majority opinion.

Even more progress has been

made if we compare the result

with that obtained in the EB66

survey of autumn 2006, when four

respondents in ten were of this

opinion (40%, vs. 52% disagree).

However, this question divides respondents; although majorities support the statement

in the EU15 countries (52%), NMS12 respondents are much less likely to do so (37%). In

contrast, responses are almost identical in Euro Zone (49%) and non-Euro Zone

countries (48%).

Other notable results include:

The belief that immigrants bring a lot to a country is the majority view in 12Member States. It is particularly strong in Sweden (89%, of whom 40% totally

agree), Luxembourg (77%) and Portugal (66%). The other countries in which a

majority support the statement, though in smaller proportions, are Denmark, the

Netherlands, Finland, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, Spain, France and

Romania.

However, it is very much less widespread in Estonia (17%), the Czech Republic(18%), Slovakia (21%), Latvia (21%) and Cyprus (21%).

There have been striking evolutions in the belief that immigrants contribute a lotto society since the EB69 survey of spring 2008: it has gained considerable

ground in Luxembourg (77%, +17 points), and in Germany (53%, +15) and the

United Kingdom (57%, +12), where it has become the majority view. While still

the minority belief, it has also become significantly more widespread in Lithuania

(38%, +12), Hungary (22%, +12) and Austria (47%, +10).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

34/46


32

Conversely, it has declined markedly in Spain (48%, -16, retaining a narrowmajority), Greece (32%, -13) and Cyprus (21%, -15).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

35/46


33

The socio-demographic analysis reveals some slight differences between categories:

The feeling that immigrants contribute a lot to a country is the majority viewamong those aged 15-24 (51%, vs. 40%); however, in the 55+ group, it is - just

- the minority opinion (45%, vs. 46%).

A majority of the more educated Europeans share this impression (60% of thosewho studied to the age of 20 or beyond), while it is clearly the minority viewamong the less educated respondents (only 41% of those whose education ended

before the age of 16 agree, while 50% disagree).

A majority of managers (62%) and white-collar workers (51%) recognise thecontribution of immigrants, but only a minority of manual workers (46%) and the

unemployed (44%) do so.

Whether respondents have difficulty paying their bills or not is a very significant factor:

while 52% of Europeans who almost never have these difficulties say that immigrants

bring a lot to their country, this proportion plummets to 38% among those who have the

most frequent problems (vs. 54% who disagree).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

36/46


34

5. Economic growth or environmental protection?

- The environment is less clearly prioritised than in the past

To measure how Europeans perceive the debate between economic growth and

environmental protection, the sample was randomly divided into two equal parts, each of

which was presented a differently worded statement5.

Half the sample, split A, were asked to respond to the statement that economic growth

must be a priority, even if it affects the environment. The second half, split B, were

asked whether they agreed that protecting the environment should be a priority, even if

it affects the economic growth.

The results were rather different, depending on which wording was used. A large

majority of Europeans say that protecting the environment should be a priority for

the country, even if it affects economic growth (71%, unchanged since the EB72

survey of autumn 2009; Split B). A quarter of Europeans oppose this idea.

However, a narrow majority of Europeans agree that economic growth must be a

priority, even if it affects the environment: 53%, vs. 42% who oppose this

statement; Split A. This opinion has gained significant ground since the EB72 survey of

autumn 2009 (+6 percentage points), and is now the majority view (compared with 47%

who agreed and 48% who disagreed at that time).

Conflicting results are thus obtained, depending on how the statement is worded.

In EU15 and NMS12 countries, similar proportions (around seven in ten) agree that the

environment should be a priority even if that has an impact on growth (Split B). This is

also the case both inside and outside the Euro Zone.

5 The split ballot method.

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

37/46


35

But the idea of giving priority to growth, even if this has an impact on the environment

(Split A), produces more contrasting responses. Though this statement still attracts the

agreement of the majority, support is weaker in EU15 countries (51%) than in the

NMS12 (60%) and within the Euro Zone (50%) than outside it (59%).

The statement that the environment should be a priority even if this affects

growth (Split B) has majority support in all Member States. Support is particularlystrong in Sweden (89%, of whom 39% totally agree), Denmark (86%), Cyprus (86%)

and Slovakia (81%). It is less widespread, commanding a scant majority, in the

Netherlands (52%).

In terms of evolutions, there has been a distinct fall in support in Greece, though it

remains the majority view (70%, -12), and a significant rise in Slovakia (81%, +12) and

Lithuania (69%, +11).

There is now majority support for the idea that growth should be a priority even

if this affects the environment (Split A) in 16 Member States, compared with 14 in

the autumn 2009 survey (EB72): Bulgaria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Ireland, Spain,

France, Italy, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia

and the United Kingdom.

At least two-thirds of respondents agree in Hungary (69%), Ireland (68%), Italy (67%)

and Portugal (66%). But what is most striking is the significant extent to which this idea

has gained ground since the autumn 2009 survey (EB72) in Cyprus (+17 to 46%),

Slovenia (+17 to 62%), Finland (+16 to 44%), Portugal (+14 to 66%), Italy (+14 to

67%), France (+12 to 53%), Poland (+11 to 64%) and the United Kingdom (+11 to

61%).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

38/46


36

However, this view is clearly the minority view in the Netherlands (29%), Germany

(34%), and Austria (37%).

The socio-demographic analysis demonstrates that a clear majority of respondents

support prioritising the environment even if that has an impact on growth (Split B) in all

categories, with relatively small differences between them. Conversely, the suggestion

that growth should take priority even if this affects the environment (Split A) leads to

more pronounced divisions:

Support is strong among the least educated Europeans (59%) while it is theminority position among those who remained in education until the age of 20 and

beyond (46%).

There is also firm support among the self-employed (57%), white-collar workers(54%) and manual workers (57%), but only a minority of managers agree (43%).

Finally, this idea is more attractive to the Europeans who are not at all interestedin politics (59%) than to those who say they are very interested (48%).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

39/46


37

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

40/46


38

6. The importance of leisure An absolute and increasing majority of Europeans are opposed to giving more

importance to leisure than to work

The idea that more importance should be given to leisure than to work continuesto attract only minority support among

Europeans: 41% agree with this

suggestion, while 54% disagree.

Opposition has grown significantly since

the EB69 survey of spring 2008 (+4

percentage points).

Support is a little stronger in the NMS12

countries (47%) than in the EU15 (40%),

but it remains a minority in both cases.

The difference between Euro Zone (40%)and non-Euro Zone countries (43%) is a

little narrower.

The idea that leisure should be given more

importance than work is the majority view

in 10 Member States, compared with 16 in

the EB69 survey of spring 2008: Estonia (63%), Slovakia (62%), Finland (61%), Malta

(56%), Slovenia (56%), Austria (55%), the Czech Republic (52%), Sweden (52%),

Hungary (51%) and Ireland (46%). The six Member States which have seen a change of

majority since the EB69 survey - and where a majority of respondents now disagree with

the statement - are Romania (45% agree, while 46% disagree), Cyprus (44%, vs. 52%),Spain (41%, vs. 51%), Greece (41%, vs. 55%), the United Kingdom (39%, vs. 57%)

and Denmark (37%, vs. 59% ).

Respondents are most likely to reject this idea in the Netherlands (68%), Lithuania

(63%), Germany (62%) and France (61%).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

41/46


39

But the most striking aspect is the very significant extent to which opposition to thisstatement has gained ground since the spring 2008 survey (EB69) in Greece (+25 to

55%), Spain (+20 to 51%), Cyprus (+15 to 52%), Ireland (+15 to 42%), the United

Kingdom (+14 to 57%) and Denmark (+14 to 59%).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

42/46


40

Evolution EB77 spring 2012 / EB69 spring 2008

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

43/46


41

The analysis by socio-demographic criteria reveals some nuances in these responses:

A narrow majority of respondents aged 15-24 support the idea of giving moreimportance to leisure (48%, while 47% disagree), whereas Europeans aged 55+

are decisively opposed to it (32% agree, 62% disagree).

Though it is still the minority position, support is stronger among the mosteducated Europeans (43%) than among those whose education ended before theage of 16 (34%).

And while once again only a minority agree, support is a little more widespreadamong white-collar workers (49%) than manual workers (46%) and managers

(43%).

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

44/46

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Between the 12th and the 27th of May 2012, TNS Opinion & Social, a consortium created between TNS plc and TNS

opinion, carried out the wave 77.3 of the EUROBAROMETER, on request of the EUROPEAN COMMISSION,Directorate-General for Communication, Research and Speechwriting.

This wave is the STANDARD EUROBAROMETER 77 and covers the population of the respective nationalities of the

European Union Member States, resident in each of the Member States and aged 15 years and over. The

STANDARD EUROBAROMETER 77 has also been conducted in the six candidate countries (Croatia, Turkey, theFormer Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Iceland, Montenegro and Serbia) and in the Turkish Cypriot Community.

In these countries, the survey covers the national population of citizens and the population of citizens of all the

European Union Member States that are residents in these countries and have a sufficient command of the nationallanguages to answer the questionnaire. The basic sample design applied in all states is a multi-stage, random

(probability) one. In each country, a number of sampling points was drawn with probability proportional to

population size (for a total coverage of the country) and to population density.

In order to do so, the sampling points were drawn systematically from each of the "administrative regional units",

after stratification by individual unit and type of area. They thus represent the whole territory of the countries

surveyed according to the EUROSTAT NUTS II (or equivalent) and according to the distribution of the resident

population of the respective nationalities in terms of metropolitan, urban and rural areas.

In each of the selectedsampling points, a starting address was drawn, at random. Further addresses (every Nth address) were selected

by standard "random route" procedures, from the initial address. In each household, the respondent was drawn, atrandom (following the "closest birthday rule"). All interviews were conducted face-to-face in people's homes and in

the appropriate national language. As far as the data capture is concerned, CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal

Interview) was used in those countries where this technique was available.

For each country a comparison between the sample and the universe was carried out. The Universe description

was derived from Eurostat population data or from national statistics offices. For all countries surveyed, a nationalweighting procedure, using marginal and intercellular weighting, was carried out based on this Universe

description. In all countries, gender, age, region and size of locality were introduced in the iteration procedure. Forinternational weighting (i.e. EU averages), TNS Opinion & Social applies the official population figures as provided

by EUROSTAT or national statistic offices. The total population figures for input in this post-weighting procedure

are listed above.

TS1

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

45/46

Readers are reminded that survey results are estimations, the accuracy of which, everything being equal, rests

upon the sample size and upon the observed percentage. With samples of about 1,000 interviews, the realpercentages vary within the following confidence limits:

various sample sizes are in rows various observed results are in columns

5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50%

N=50 6,0 8,3 9,9 11,1 12,0 12,7 13,2 13,6 13,8 13,9 N=50

N=500 1,9 2,6 3,1 3,5 3,8 4,0 4,2 4,3 4,4 4,4 N=500

N=1000 1,4 1,9 2,2 2,5 2,7 2,8 3,0 3,0 3,1 3,1 N=1000

N=1500 1,1 1,5 1,8 2,0 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,5 2,5 N=1500

N=2000 1,0 1,3 1,6 1,8 1,9 2,0 2,1 2,1 2,2 2,2 N=2000

N=3000 0,8 1,1 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,8 1,8 N=3000

N=4000 0,7 0,9 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,5 N=4000

N=5000 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,4 N=5000

N=6000 0,6 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,3 N=6000

N=7000 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 1,2 1,2 N=7000

N=7500 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 1,1 N=7500

N=8000 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 N=8000

N=9000 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 N=9000

N=10000 0,4 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 N=10000

N=11000 0,4 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 N=11000

N=12000 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 N=12000

N=13000 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 N=13000N=14000 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 N=14000

N=15000 0,3 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 N=15000

5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50%

Statistical Margins due to the sampling process

(at the 95% level of confidence)

TS2

7/28/2019 Eb77 Value En

46/46

ABBR. COUNTRIES INSTITUTESN

INTERVIEWS

FIELDWORK

DATES

POPULATION

15+

BE Belgium TNS Dimarso 1.076 12/05/2012 25/05/2012 8.866.411BG Bulgaria TNS BBSS 1.016 12/05/2012 21/05/2012 6.584.957CZ Czech Rep. TNS Aisa 1.002 12/05/2012 24/05/2012 8.987.535DK Denmark TNS Gallup DK 1.007 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 4.533.420DE Germany TNS Infratest 1.502 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 64.545.601

EE Estonia Emor 1.000 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 916.000IE Ireland Ipsos MRBI 1.000 12/05/2012 25/05/2012 3.375.399EL Greece TNS ICAP 1.001 12/05/2012 25/05/2012 8.693.566ES Spain TNS Demoscopia 1.006 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 39.035.867FR France TNS Sofres 1.007 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 47.620.942IT Italy TNS Infratest 1.036 12/05/2012 24/05/2012 51.252.247CY Rep. of Cyprus Synovate 505 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 651.400LV Latvia TNS Latvia 1.007 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 1.448.719LT Lithuania TNS LT 1.019 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 2.849.359LU Luxembourg TNS ILReS 507 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 404.907HU Hungary TNS Hoffmann Kft 1.010 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 8.320.614MT Malta MISCO 500 12/05/2012 26/05/2012 335.476NL Netherlands TNS NIPO 1.012 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 13.288.200

AT AustriasterreichischesGallup-Institut

993 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 6.973.277

PL Poland TNS OBOP 1.000 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 32.306.436PT Portugal TNS EUROTESTE 1.010 14/05/2012 27/05/2012 8.080.915RO Romania TNS CSOP 1.073 12/05/2012 22/05/2012 18.246.731

SI Slovenia RM PLUS 1.023 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 1.748.308SK Slovakia TNS Slovakia 1.000 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 4.549.954FI Finland TNS Gallup Oy 1.001 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 4.412.321SE Sweden TNS GALLUP 1.019 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 7.723.931UK United Kingdom TNS UK 1.305 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 51.081.866

TOTAL

EU2726.637 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 406.834.359

CY(tcc)Turkish CypriotCommunity

Kadem 500 12/05/2012 25/05/2012 143.226

HR Croatia Puls 1.000 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 3.749.400TR Turkey TNS PIAR 1.000 14/05/2012 27/05/2012 52.728.513

MKFormer Yugoslav Rep. ofMacedonia

TNS Brima 1.056 12/05/2012 18/05/2012 1.678.404

IS Iceland Capacent 500 252.277ME Montenegro TNS Medium Gallup 1.015 12/05/2012 21/05/2012 492.265RS Serbia TNS Medium Gallup 1.020 12/05/2012 17/05/2012 6.409.693

TOTAL32.728 12/05/2012 27/05/2012 472.288.137

Eb77 Value En

Documents

Transcript of Eb77 Value En