Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to...

71
Prof. José Leopoldo Ferreira Antunes [email protected] Curso de Verão Análise Multinível em Estudos Epidemiológicos 1

Transcript of Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to...

Page 1: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Prof. José Leopoldo Ferreira Antunes

[email protected]

Curso de VerãoAnálise Multinível em

Estudos Epidemiológicos

1

Page 2: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Programa

1. Introdução: alguns conceitos2. Revisando análise de regressão3. Tipos de efeitos (randômico,

fixo ou intra, entre)4. Models (intercepto randômico,

coeficiente randômico)

Page 3: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Each person•Is worth of respect and of being heard.•Is responsible for respecting and listening to others.•Is responsible for what they choose to share with the group.•Must respect the confidentiality of what others have chosen to share with the group.•Is responsible for their own decisions and actions.•Has the right to be silent on any issue.•Is allowed to change their mind.•Is allowed to make mistakes.

Our agreement Joe Gelona

Page 4: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Huijts T, Perkins JM, Subramanian SV. Political regimes, political ideology, and self-rated health in Europe: a multilevel analysis. PLoS ONE 5(7): e11711.

S. V. Subramanian

Page 5: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 6: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 7: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 8: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Huijts T, Perkins JM, Subramanian SV. Political regimes, political ideology, and self-rated health in Europe: a multilevel analysis. PLoS ONE 5(7): e11711.

Page 9: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Desfecho = yi (medido em cadaindivíduo i)...Fator individual = xi (medido em cada indivíduo i) Fator contextual = Xj (medido em cada contexto j)

Page 10: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

i = indivíduo de 1 a n;j = contexto de 1 a mai,j

Page 11: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Programa...

Page 12: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Trabalho

Page 13: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Prova

Page 14: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

“Consiste em integrar fatores individuais e contextuais na análise epidemiológica dos estados e condições de saúde. Fundamenta-se na percepção de que a distribuição de saúde e doença na população não pode ser apenas explicada por características individuais. É uma metodologia para analisar desfechos em relação a fatores que são avaliados em diferentes níveis (indivíduos, instituições, bairros, cidades). Seu objetivo é explicar como variáveis individuais e contextuais interagem para interferir na saúde.”

Porta M. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 5th Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Miquel Porta

Page 15: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

“Integram fatores individuais e contextuais na análise

da distribuição de doenças e estados de saúde.”

“Utiliza métodos que analisam os desfechos de saúde

em relação a determinantes avaliados em diferentes

níveis, por exemplo, indivíduos, locais de trabalho,

áreas residenciais, regiões geográficas.”

Tom Snijders

Roel Bosker

Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications; 2003.

Page 16: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

“A idéia de que os indivíduos podem ser influenciados por seu contexto social é uma noção chave das ciências sociais, e tem levado a muito debate e pesquisas empíricas sobre as interações entre os atributos dos grupos e os atributos dos indivíduos.”

Diez-Roux AV. Multilevel analysis in public health research. Annu Rev Public Health 2000; 21:171-92.

Ana Diez-Roux

Page 17: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

“A análise multinível pode ser usada para inferir os efeitos de causas individuais e de causas relativas a contextos sobre os resultados de saúde nos indivíduos. Seu campo de aplicação é vasto e pode envolver estudos de indivíduos aninhados em instituições (famílias, escolas, hospitais, locais de trabalho) ou em áreas de moradia (casas, bairros, cidades, regiões). Pode também envolver análise de dados longitudinais (medidas dos mesmos indivíduos repetidas no tempo) e estudos de meta-análise (pessoas examinadas no contexto de diferentes estudos).”

Diez-Roux AV. A glossary for multilevel analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56:588-94.

Ana Diez-Roux

Page 18: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. 2nd ed. London: Institute of Education, Multilevel Models Project, 1999.http://www.soziologie.uni-halle.de/langer/multilevel/books/goldstein.pdf

Harvey Goldstein

“A análise multinível pode trazer um ganho ponderável para o esforço de compreensão da causalidade. Não é, entretanto uma panacéia universal. Não pode substituir teorias consistentes e bem construídas. Não pode dispensar a reflexão cuidadosa que se espera para qualquer procedimento de modelagem estatística. Ademais, essa análise introduz mais complexidade; propicia, mas não simplifica a compreensão. Modelos multiníveis são ferramentas para serem utilizadas com cuidado e ponderação.”

Page 19: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Sophia Rabe-Hesketh

Outros termos para modelos multinível incluem modelos hierárquicos, modelos de

efeitos ou coeficientes randômicos, modelos de efeitos mistos, ou simplesmente modelos

mistos.

Anders Skrondal

Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. 2nd ed. College Station, Tx: Stata Press: 2008.

Page 20: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

“Efeitos de fatores relacionados aos grupos ou áreas a que os indívíduos pertencem (por exemplo, indicadores de poluição ambiental) sobre desfechos individuais, após levar em consideração os efeitos de características individuais que podem ser relevantes como fatores de confusão. São estimados usando análise multinível.”

Porta M. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 5th Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Miquel Porta

Page 21: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

“Efeitos de fatores individuais (i.e., características dos indivíduos dentro de grupos ou áreas, como a renda individual), sobre desfechos individuais, após levar em consideração os efeitos de fatores relevantes no nível dos grupos ou áreas a que esses indivíduos pertencem. São estimados usando análise multinível.”

Porta M. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 5th Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Miquel Porta

Page 22: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

desfecho

fator

Neste exemplo, se a amostra é aleatória simples; não há efeito do fator sobre o desfecho…

Page 23: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

desfecho

fator

Se a amostra é organizada nos contextos das cores; o fator tem efeito crescente sobre o desfecho…

Page 24: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

desfecho

fator

Se a amostra é organizada nos contextos das cores; o fator tem efeito decrescente sobre o desfecho…

Page 25: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

desfecho

fator

O fator tem efeito decrescente sobre o desfecho;porém, há um efeito contextual que é crescente…

Page 26: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

desfecho

fator

O fator tem efeito decrescente sobre o desfecho;porém, há um efeito contextual que é crescente…

Page 27: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Banco de dados Nível 1(dados individuais)

Nível 2(dados contextuais)

Tabagismo na gravidez e peso ao nascer Nascidos vivos Mães

Desempenho escolar (ENEM) e renda familiar Alunos 2º grau Escolas

Doença infecciosa e exposição ambiental Indivíduos Bairros

Fatores associados à cárie dentária Indivíduos Cidades

Fatores associados à cárie dentária Dentes Indivíduos

Tuberculose e aderência ao tratamento Pacientes Unidades de saúde

Avaliação longitudinal de um tratamento Medidas repetidas Pacientes

Meta-análise de avaliação de um tratamento Pacientes Estudos

Page 28: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Qual a diferença entre análisemultínível, análise longitudinale meta-análise?

Page 29: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 30: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

“Análise estatística dos resultados de estudos separados, cujo objetivo é gerar um sumário quantitativo desses resultados, caso essa síntese possa ser sustentada por uma avaliação de comparabilidade entre os estudos. A integração dos resultados de diferentes estudos pode permitir encontrar padrões ou tendências gerais dos resultados encontrados. Devem ser considerados vários vieses na seleção de participantes dos estudos, detecção de casos e apresentação de resultados .”

Porta M. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 5th Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Miquel Porta

Page 31: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 32: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Rahman M, Sakamoto J, Fukui T. Bidi smoking and oral cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2003; 106: 600-4.

Mahbubur Rahman

Page 33: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Rahman M, Sakamoto J, Fukui T. Bidi smoking and oral cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2003; 106: 600-4.

Page 34: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Rahman M, Sakamoto J, Fukui T. Bidi smoking and oral cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2003; 106: 600-4.

Page 35: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 36: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

The Cochrane Collaboration open learning material. Publication bias.http://www.cochrane-net.org/openlearning/html/mod15-3.htm

Page 37: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 38: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Revisando a análise de regressão

1.Regressão linear simples2.Regressão logística3.Regressão de Poisson4.Análise multivariada5.Análise hierárquica (modelos

conceituais)

Page 39: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Y = b0 + b1*X

Regressão linear simples

Page 40: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 41: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 42: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Y = b0 + b1*X + b2*Z + e

Análise multivariada

Page 43: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Premissas da análisede regressão linear

1. Distribuição normal2. Homoscedasticidade

Page 44: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Distribuição normal

Distribuição não normal

Page 45: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

HeteroscedasticidadeÉ o fenômeno estatístico que ocorre quando o modelo de hipótese matemático apresenta variâncias para Y e X (X1, X2, X3,..., Xn) que não são iguais para todas as observações.

Page 46: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 47: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Antunes JLF, Waldman EA. The impact of AIDS, immigration and housing overcrowding on tuberculosis deaths in São Paulo, Brazil, 1994-1998. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52:1071-80.

Page 48: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Análise bivariada

Page 49: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 50: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 51: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 52: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 53: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Análise multivariada

Page 54: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

Análise bivariada

Page 55: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 56: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 57: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 58: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 59: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.
Page 60: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

1.Numa equação de regressão linear simples para salário anual, estimou-se em 3623 o coeficiente para uma variável dummy identificando sexo masculino.

a. Interprete o coeficiente estimado.

Exercícios

Page 61: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

1.Numa equação de regressão linear simples para salário anual, estimou-se em 3623 o coeficiente para uma variável dummy identificando sexo masculino.

a. Interprete o coeficiente estimado.b. Se a variável dummy fosse para sexo feminino, qual

seria o coeficiente?

Exercícios

Page 62: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

1.Numa equação de regressão linear simples para salário anual, estimou-se em 3623 o coeficiente para uma variável dummy identificando sexo masculino.

a. Interprete o coeficiente estimado.b. Se a variável dummy fosse para sexo feminino, qual

seria o coeficiente?c. O erro padrão do coeficiente para o sexo masculino foi

1912. Pode-se rejeitar a hipótese nula de que o salário médio na população seria o mesmo para os dois sexos, considerando um teste bi-caudal no nível de 5% de significância?

Exercícios

Page 63: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

2. Numa equação de regressão ajustando o salário anual segundo a idade, o intercepto foi estimado em –2000.

Qual o significado desse valor?

Exercícios

Page 64: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

2. Numa equação de regressão ajustando o salário anual segundo a idade, o intercepto foi estimado em –2000.

Qual o significado desse valor?

Como pode ser negativo, se o salário é sempre positivo?

Exercícios

Page 65: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

3. Em um programa de avaliação da compreensão de textos (em inglês) por crianças, a diferença de escores entre as que falam inglês em casa e as que não falam foi 63, com erro padrão de 10. Quando controlada por condição socioeconômica, a diferença ajustada entre os escores foi estimada em 49, com erro padrão de 10.a.O que significa controlar ou ajustar por condição

socioeconômica?

Exercícios

Page 66: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

3. Em um programa de avaliação da compreensão de textos (em inglês) por crianças, a diferença de escores entre as que falam inglês em casa e as que não falam foi 63, com erro padrão de 10. Quando controlada por condição socioeconômica, a diferença ajustada entre os escores foi estimada em 49, com erro padrão de 10.a.O que significa controlar ou ajustar por condição

socioeconômica?b.Por que o ajuste por uma variável “z” altera o

coeficiente de regressão que indica o efeito da variável “x” sobre a variável “y”?

Exercícios

Page 67: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

3. Em um programa de avaliação da compreensão de textos (em inglês) por crianças, a diferença de escores entre as que falam inglês em casa e as que não falam foi 63, com erro padrão de 10. Quando controlada por condição socioeconômica, a diferença ajustada entre os escores foi estimada em 49, com erro padrão de 10.a.O que significa controlar ou ajustar por condição

socioeconômica?b.Por que o ajuste por uma variável “z” altera o

coeficiente de regressão que indica o efeito da variável “x” sobre a variável “y”?

c.Como explicar a mudança no exemplo acima, atentando para o sentido da diferença entre os valores?

Exercícios

Page 68: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

4. Considere a seguinte equação de regressão explicando os salários de uma empresa:

Y=30000+2000*masc+600*anos_exp–100*masc*anos_exp

a. Interprete cada coeficiente que foi estimado.

Exercícios

Page 69: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

4. Considere a seguinte equação de regressão explicando os salários de uma empresa:

Y=30000+2000*masc+600*anos_exp–100*masc*anos_exp

a. Interprete cada coeficiente que foi estimado.

b. Qual é a diferença entre o salário médio na população, entre homens e mulheres que têm 10 anos de experiência?

Exercícios

Page 70: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.

5. No exercício anterior, a equação de regressão continha um termo de interação entre “anos de experiência” e “sexo masculino” :

Y=30000+2000*masc+600*anos_exp–100*masc*anos_exp

Como se constrói uma variável para discriminar o termo de interação?

Exercícios

Page 71: Each person Is worth of respect and of being heard. Is responsible for respecting and listening to others. Is responsible for what they choose to share.