E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
5
Transcript of E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.
![Page 1: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
E12 Report from the Burst Group
Burst Analysis Group
and the
Glitch Investigation Team
![Page 2: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Tools and Methods
![Page 3: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
BurstMon: Control-Room Figures of Merit
Using injected signals (sine-gaussians Q=9 F=100, 235, 555 Hz)» Minimum detectable signal amplitude for 1% black pixel probability and 1 Hz
false rate» The ratio hrss_min/noise is a measure of how glitches affect the burst search» for gaussian data, expect ratio~4
Fraction of pixels in clusters of size > N» large fraction is associated to strong glitches that will affect the burst search. » for gaussian data: N=2, fraction=0.13 N=4, fraction=0.05
Variability» ratio of "instantaneous" (fraction of a second) to average (minutes) noise RMS.» for “good” data, expect v=1
Properties of loudest trigger in each minute» Time, Frequency, SNR» could be used for “quick” diagnostics and veto studies of loudest glitches
For trend plots and histograms over E12 at L1, H1, H2, see:
http://emvogil-3.mit.edu/~cadonati/E12/BurstMon/BurstMon.html
![Page 4: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
100 Hz235 Hz555 Hz
L1 during E12 science segments longer than 1800 sec
![Page 5: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
L1 during E12 science segments longer than 1800 sec
H1 during E12 science segments longer than 1800 sec – starting Friday 8 UTC
![Page 6: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Friday morning at L1 this FOM is sensitive to trains!
fraction of pixels in clusters with size >2
LVEA seismometers (STS2_X and Y)
![Page 7: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Trigger Analysis
Excess Power (http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/~kipp/E12)» on AS_Q, up to 1 kHz
KleineWelle (http://lancelot.mit.edu/~lindy/e12/report)» on AS_Q, AS_I, AS_AC, MICH_CTRL, PRC_CTRL, POB_Q, REFL_Q, WFS1_QP,
WFS2_QP, up to 1 kHz
WaveBurst (http://tier2.phys.ufl.edu/~klimenko/waveburst/E11/datasets)» on AS_Q, up to 2 kHz
For diagnostic plots and veto studies over E12 at L1, H1, H2, see:
http://emvogil-3.mit.edu/~cadonati/E12/TriggerAnalysisReport.html
![Page 8: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Results
![Page 9: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
L1Detectable burst amplitude: 4-6 10-22 strain/sqrt(Hz)
Ratio FOM: 6-7 at 100, 235 Hz 5 at 555 Hz – stable during E12
pixel fraction FOM, N=2: ~0.4 (0.13 for gaussian noise)
Variability: significant improvement from S3 but still detector shows a lot of noise non-stationarity.
S3 E12
![Page 10: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
L1KleineWelle
BurstMon
autocorrelation scale=10 sbumps at ~20, 40 sec0.1 Hz noise?
Dominant trigger frequency: 90-100 Hz. Also, high frequencyphase noise
Frequency of most significant trigger
Autocorrelation
time [s]
![Page 11: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Early Veto CandidatesKleineWelle triggers with Significance>100 (non-gaussian tail in event histogram
all tested channels exhibit correlations. PRC_CTRL has ~30% veto efficiency
WFS1_QPPRC_CTRL
glitches in high 1-3 Hz
seismic noise
![Page 12: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
H1Detectable burst amplitude: 4-6 10-22 strain/sqrt(Hz)
Ratio FOM: 6-12 at 100, 235 Hz 4-6 at 555 Hz – large excursions
pixel fraction FOM, N=2: often ~1 (glitches!!!!)
Variability: significant improvement from S3 (similar to E11)
E12S3
![Page 13: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
H1
KleineWelle
BurstMon
autocorrelation scale=1 s(note: both H1 and H2 are required to be in science mode)
Dominant trigger frequency: 250 Hz(known resonance in the TCS)
Power
start analysis: Feb 4, 8 UTC
Frequency of most significant trigger
time [s]
![Page 14: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
H2Detectable burst amplitude: 6-10 10-22 strain/sqrt(Hz)
Ratio FOM: 6 at 100, 235 Hz 4.5 at 555 Hz – stable
pixel fraction FOM, N=2: large excursions 0.2-0.8
Variability: significant improvement from S3 (similar to E11)
E12S3
![Page 15: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
H2 KleineWelle
WaveBurst
autocorrelation scale=2 and 5 s(note: both H1 and H2 are required to be in science mode)
Dominant trigger frequency: 950 Hz
Power
start analysis: Feb 4, 8 UTC
Power
![Page 16: E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649d2c5503460f94a017d9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Conclusion
The BurstMon ratio FOM quantifies how the sensitivity of the burst pipeline is affected by glitches» FOMs relatively stable at L1, excursions at H2
Variability improved since S3 Transients at L1 associated to seismic noise (1-3Hz)
and to phase noise in the 1.5-2kHz range Features at H1 have the largest impact on the burst
analysis:» large excursions of all figures of merit during E12» 1 sec periodicity» 250 Hz