E VIDENCE A GAINST T HE B IG B ANG T HEORY Ms Desirae.

6
EVIDENCE AGAINST THE BIG BANG THEORY Ms Desirae

Transcript of E VIDENCE A GAINST T HE B IG B ANG T HEORY Ms Desirae.

Page 1: E VIDENCE A GAINST T HE B IG B ANG T HEORY Ms Desirae.

EVIDENCE AGAINST THE BIG BANG THEORYMs Desirae

Page 2: E VIDENCE A GAINST T HE B IG B ANG T HEORY Ms Desirae.

CREATIONISM

Creationism- the belief that the universe and living organisms were created from specific acts of divine creation, rather than by undirected processes such as evolution.

Page 3: E VIDENCE A GAINST T HE B IG B ANG T HEORY Ms Desirae.

EVIDENCE #1

The First Law of Thermodynamics states that the total quantity of matter and energy in the universe is constant. The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that matter and energy always tend to change from complex and ordered states to disordered states. This implies that the universe could not have

existed forever or it would have already run down

Also implies that the universe could have not created itself

Page 4: E VIDENCE A GAINST T HE B IG B ANG T HEORY Ms Desirae.

EVIDENCE #2

Life appears abruptly and in complex forms in the fossil record, and gaps appear systematically in the fossil record between various living kinds. (Cambrian Explosion) The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that

entropy tends to increase unless added energy is directed by a conversion mechanism. Simple molecules and complex protein, DNA, and RNA molecules could not have evolved spontaneously into a living cell.

The laboratory experiments have not even remotely approached the synthesis of life from nonlife, and the limited results have depended on laboratory conditions that are artificially imposed and extremely improbable.

Page 5: E VIDENCE A GAINST T HE B IG B ANG T HEORY Ms Desirae.

EVIDENCE #3

The creation of the Universe, Earth and living kinds may have been relatively recent Radiometric dating methods depend on three

assumptions: (1) that no decay product (lead or argon) was present initially

or that the initial quantities can be accurately estimated (2) that the decay system was closed through the years (so

that radioactive material or product did not move in or out of the rock)

(3) that the decay rate was constant over time.

Each of these assumptions may be questionable (1) some nonradiogenic lead or argon was perhaps present

initially (2) the radioactive isotope (uranium or potassium isotopes)

can perhaps migrate out of, and the decay product (lead or argon) can migrate into, many rocks over the years

(3) the decay rate can perhaps change by neutrino bombardment and other causes.

Page 6: E VIDENCE A GAINST T HE B IG B ANG T HEORY Ms Desirae.

SOURCE

http://www.icr.org