HONORS WORLD FINAL EXAM Jeopardy Version Watch out Alex Trebek…
E THICS AND M ORALITY IN E VOLUTION By: Emily Trebek, Jessica Hecht, and Sean Astrup.
-
Upload
joella-barber -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of E THICS AND M ORALITY IN E VOLUTION By: Emily Trebek, Jessica Hecht, and Sean Astrup.
![Page 1: E THICS AND M ORALITY IN E VOLUTION By: Emily Trebek, Jessica Hecht, and Sean Astrup.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649d155503460f949e9d03/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ETHICS AND MORALITY IN EVOLUTIONBy: Emily Trebek, Jessica Hecht, and Sean Astrup
![Page 2: E THICS AND M ORALITY IN E VOLUTION By: Emily Trebek, Jessica Hecht, and Sean Astrup.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649d155503460f949e9d03/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE ON MORALITY
Moral emotions are considered to be “emotions that focus on others and result in an outcome which helps others or society” (Brosnan, 2010)
Historically, it was thought that only human beings are able to demonstrate morality
We have found higher-level processes showing cooperation in non-human species as well especially primates
This is important because it can allow us to understand how our sense of morality evolved
![Page 3: E THICS AND M ORALITY IN E VOLUTION By: Emily Trebek, Jessica Hecht, and Sean Astrup.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649d155503460f949e9d03/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SMITH, DARWIN, AND MORAL EMOTIONS
Adam Smith and Charles Darwin both believed the idea that animals have the capability to demonstrate morality
Adam Smith supported the idea that human instincts were in place to promote survival/reproduction, and these instincts were experienced as emotions rather than rational thought
Darwin proved that morality is innate through his study on facial expressions and how they are universally recognized by both humans and non-human species
![Page 4: E THICS AND M ORALITY IN E VOLUTION By: Emily Trebek, Jessica Hecht, and Sean Astrup.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649d155503460f949e9d03/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MORALITY AND JUSTICE
Equality and equity Equality “assumes identity outcomes, but fails to
account for effort and deservedness” (Brosnan, 2010)
Equity fills the void and has two parts: Reaction to one’s own outcome Reaction to others’ outcome
![Page 5: E THICS AND M ORALITY IN E VOLUTION By: Emily Trebek, Jessica Hecht, and Sean Astrup.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649d155503460f949e9d03/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
EQUITY AND EQUALITY IN NON-HUMANS Many non-human species like chips, dogs and rabbits
show responses that indicate frustration or distress when they are treated less favorably than a social partner
In a study where chimps were given two options to bring food to itself only or bring food to itself and a partner, the chimp’s choices weren’t statistically significant. There are a few things that predict this behavior: 1. Food is a competitive resource which makes it a zero-
sum game between those who have food and those who don’t
2. Explicit request are required to generate prosocial behavior in chimps
Primates will only respond to inequity when the reward is a payment rather than a gift
![Page 6: E THICS AND M ORALITY IN E VOLUTION By: Emily Trebek, Jessica Hecht, and Sean Astrup.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649d155503460f949e9d03/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePgC91kcmN0
![Page 7: E THICS AND M ORALITY IN E VOLUTION By: Emily Trebek, Jessica Hecht, and Sean Astrup.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649d155503460f949e9d03/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
EVOLUTION OF THE SENSE OF JUSTICE
1. Notice Inequity: byproduct of another behavior to force individuals to pay attention to details
2. Respond negatively to inequity: end interaction with inequity-givers make new relationships with beneficial people, enhancing the individual’s fitness
3. Understand they have received less and take steps to rectify inequity In humans, punish individuals who aren’t fair In animals, cease to cooperate
4. Respond with advantageous equity: acting against their own short-term self interest, giving up rewards to benefit partners to gain a long-term benefit
![Page 8: E THICS AND M ORALITY IN E VOLUTION By: Emily Trebek, Jessica Hecht, and Sean Astrup.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649d155503460f949e9d03/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
CRITICAL REVIEW
Are the observable moral traits in animals such as primates and social insects a result of convergent evolution (such as the eye) or a result of the beneficial trait inherited by an ancestor of these species?
When different species of primates are tested they don’t always behave the same
Wild species behave differently than species raised in captivity
The reason humans respond negatively even when advantaged by inequality is that prosocial behaviors like an abnormally strong sense of reciprocity were very important during human evolution
![Page 9: E THICS AND M ORALITY IN E VOLUTION By: Emily Trebek, Jessica Hecht, and Sean Astrup.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649d155503460f949e9d03/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
WORKS CITED Brosnan, S.F. (2010) An evolutionary perspective on
morality. Journal of Economic
Behavior & Organization, 77(1), 23-30.
Cooperation and Fairness: Moral Behavior in Monkeys (Video file). Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePgC91kcmN0
Spiegel, A. (2010). Is Believing In God Evolutionarily Advantageous? Retrieved from
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129528196