02/21/2003Physics at DZERO1 Exploring the Microscopic Structure of the University with DZero??
DZero Run IIb Rev Nov 05 ‘03 1 Kotcher Agenda (from Rebaselining Review) Introduction (Kotcher...
-
Upload
melinda-stewart -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of DZero Run IIb Rev Nov 05 ‘03 1 Kotcher Agenda (from Rebaselining Review) Introduction (Kotcher...
![Page 1: DZero Run IIb Rev Nov 05 ‘03 1 Kotcher Agenda (from Rebaselining Review) Introduction (Kotcher – 10’) Trigger & DAQ/Online (Wood – 30’) u AFE II/TriP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082821/5697c0291a28abf838cd78e3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
DZero Run IIb RevNov 05 ‘031 Kotcher
Agenda(from Rebaselining Review)
Introduction (Kotcher – 10’) Trigger & DAQ/Online (Wood – 30’)
AFE II/TriP (Bross – 15’) BREAK Silicon Layer 0 (Lipton – 30’) Baseline Change Proposal, Rebaseline Summary
(Kotcher – 30’)
Rebaselining Review of the Run
IIb DZero Detector Project
November 5, 2003Fermilab
Most everything you will see today is in draft form
![Page 2: DZero Run IIb Rev Nov 05 ‘03 1 Kotcher Agenda (from Rebaselining Review) Introduction (Kotcher – 10’) Trigger & DAQ/Online (Wood – 30’) u AFE II/TriP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082821/5697c0291a28abf838cd78e3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
DZero Run IIb RevNov 05 ‘032 Kotcher
AFE II/TriP UpgradeWBS 1.2.8
We are proposing an upgrade to the Central Fiber Tracker (CFT) readout & triggering system
Maintain tracking capability in light of cancellation of silicon upgrade, particularly at increased luminosity
considerably improved noise performance – lower thresholds, enhance triggering, efficiency
z-information from timing New Analog Front-End Boards (AFE II) and trigger (TriP)
chip First version TriP chip submitted with SVX4 Designed, tested by Fermilab (PPD, Yarema) Was major success out of the box First full AFE II prototype being laid out now, expect back by
end CY03 System represents major simplification, performance
upgrade Exploiting considerable in-house experience – personnel,
depth of technical knowledge TPC = $2.2M (includes 50% total contingency)
M&S cost estimate based on detailed past experience see talk by Bross
![Page 3: DZero Run IIb Rev Nov 05 ‘03 1 Kotcher Agenda (from Rebaselining Review) Introduction (Kotcher – 10’) Trigger & DAQ/Online (Wood – 30’) u AFE II/TriP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082821/5697c0291a28abf838cd78e3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
DZero Run IIb RevNov 05 ‘033 Kotcher
Run IIb Project OrganizationNov ‘03
D0 Run IIb ProjectJ. Kotcher, Project Manager
V. O’Dell, Deputy (Trigger/DAQ); R. Lipton, Deputy (Silicon Layer 0) W. Freeman, Associate; M. Johnson, Technical
Coordinator D. Knapp, Budget Officer; T. Erickson, Administration
WBS 1.2Trigger
P. Padley D. Wood
1.2.3 L1 Track TriggerM. Narain
1.2.1 L1 Cal UpgradeM. Abolins, H. Evans
1.2.4 L2UpgradeR. Hirosky
1.2.5 Silicon Track Trigger U. Heintz
WBS 1.3DAQ/Online
S. FuessP. Slattery
1.2.2 L1 Cal/Track MatchK. Johns
1.2.6 SimulationE. Barberis, M. Hildreth
WBS 1.5 Installation
R. Smith
1.5.1 Silicon InstallationMechanical: (W. Cooper)Electronics: (L. Bagby)
1.5.2 Trigger InstallationD. Edmunds
WBS 1.4Project
Administration
1.2.7 Administration(D. Wood)
1.3.3 Control SystemsF. Bartlett, G. Savage,
V. Sirotenko
1.3.1 Level 3 SystemsD. Chapin, G. Watts
1.3.4 DAQ/Online Management(P. Slattery)
1.3.2 Network & Host Systems
J. Fitzmaurice, S. Krzywdzinski
Installation an integrated part of project plan, but
removed from formal Run IIb baselining
1.2.8 AFE II/TriPA. Bross, TBD
WBS 1.6Silicon Layer 0
A. Bean(R. Lipton)
1.6.1 SensorsM. Demarteau,
R. McCarthy
1.6.2 Readout ElecA. Nomerotski,
R. Sidwell
1.6.3 Mech Des & FabricationW. Cooper
1.6.4, 1.6.5 Detector Modules
& IntegJ. Fast, L. Bagby
1.6.6 Administration (A.
Bean)
Full Run IIb silicon replacement, now
cancelled, was WBS 1.1
For initial prototyping
phase
![Page 4: DZero Run IIb Rev Nov 05 ‘03 1 Kotcher Agenda (from Rebaselining Review) Introduction (Kotcher – 10’) Trigger & DAQ/Online (Wood – 30’) u AFE II/TriP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082821/5697c0291a28abf838cd78e3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
DZero Run IIb RevNov 05 ‘034 Kotcher
AFE II/TriP Decision Process
Project funding request ($2.2M) includes both salaries and M&S for production only; does not contain either salaries or M&S for R&D
Has been coming from operating funds (e.g., TriP work & testing)
Agreement with Laboratory that this will continue Before fully supporting the pursuit of this sub-
project, we first must convince ourselves that it will provide the experiment with sufficient gains to justify the considerable effort & potential interruptions to data-taking, and that the scheme will work as advertised
Given the time scales (summer ’05 completion), answering these questions must be given sufficient priority during the next few months…and without allowing operations to falter
![Page 5: DZero Run IIb Rev Nov 05 ‘03 1 Kotcher Agenda (from Rebaselining Review) Introduction (Kotcher – 10’) Trigger & DAQ/Online (Wood – 30’) u AFE II/TriP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082821/5697c0291a28abf838cd78e3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
DZero Run IIb RevNov 05 ‘035 Kotcher
AFE II/TriP Decision Process
The following must be completed before production funds will be released:
Continuation/completion of simulations TriP resubmission
Abder is starting AFE II prototype layout, fabrication & testing
Arrangements to free John A. up to pursue this for next few months being finalized now
Operations will be covered Fabrication and testing must immediately follow
DZero Internal Review, followed by a Laboratory Review, if warranted
![Page 6: DZero Run IIb Rev Nov 05 ‘03 1 Kotcher Agenda (from Rebaselining Review) Introduction (Kotcher – 10’) Trigger & DAQ/Online (Wood – 30’) u AFE II/TriP.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082821/5697c0291a28abf838cd78e3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
DZero Run IIb RevNov 05 ‘036 Kotcher
AFE II/TriP Decision Process
The DZero Review will be a critical one Among the things they will be asked to look over:
Technical gains & feasibility Physics benefits Realism of schedule Long-term commitment of personnel Credibility of installation and commissioning plan, and its
impact on acquisition of physics quality data A major consideration
Will be asked to provide an overall recommendation, submitted to Spokes, PM
If justification is there, and the DZero Internal Review Committee recommends moving forward, would like to hold the Laboratory Review no later than April ’04
Targeting summer ’05 completion (installation during summer shutdown), which is still tight