Dysregulaon of the!ADAM17/Notch! signaling!pathways!in ... · Iñaki&González Foruria,...

26
Iñaki GonzálezForuria, Pietro Santulli, Sandrine Chouzenoux, Francisco Carmona, Charles Chapron, Frédéric Ba@eux Dysregula+on of the ADAM17/Notch signaling pathways in endometriosis correlates with disease severity and fibrosis

Transcript of Dysregulaon of the!ADAM17/Notch! signaling!pathways!in ... · Iñaki&González Foruria,...

Iñaki  González-­‐Foruria,  Pietro  Santulli,  Sandrine  Chouzenoux,    Francisco  Carmona,  Charles  Chapron,  Frédéric  Ba@eux    

Dysregula+on  of  the  ADAM17/Notch  signaling  pathways  in  endometriosis  correlates  with  disease  severity  and  

fibrosis  

Introduc+on  

•  Benign  gynaecological  disease  

•  Chronic  inflammatory  condi+on  (Bulun,  2009)  

•  Overproduc+on   of   prostaglandins,   metalloproteases,  cytokines  and  chemokines  (Santulli,  2014)  

•  Oxida+ve   stress   plays   an   essen+al   role   in   the   onset  and  progression  (Ngo,  2009;  Santulli,  2015)  

Introduc+on  

•  Oxida+ve  stress  induces  the  synthesis  of  inflammatory  mediators  

•  ADAM   family   metalloproteases,   such   as   ADAM17  (Zhang,  2001)  

ROS   ADAM-­‐17  

Introduc+on  

•  Oxida+ve  stress  induces  the  synthesis  of  inflammatory  mediators  

•  ADAM   family   metalloproteases,   such   as   ADAM17  (Zhang,  2001)  

•  ADAM  family  members  are  proteoly+cally  ac+ve  over  target  proteins,  such  as  Notch  (Milleri,  2013)  

•  Notch   are   transmembrane   receptors   that   regulate  many  cell  processes  (Hori,  2013)  

ADAM-­‐17  

Notch  complex  

 Mul+ple  cell  

func+ons  

ROS  

Introduc+on  

•  Notch  ac+vates   trancrip+on  of  nuclear   target   genes  related  to  fibrosis  

•  Notch  promotes  fibroblasts  prolifera+on  and  fibrosis  (Kavian,  2014)  

ADAM-­‐17  

Notch  complex  

Transcrip+onal  ac+va+on  

 Mul+ple  cell  

func+ons  

FIBROSIS          

ROS  

Nuclear  transloca+on  

Introduc+on  

•  Notch   ac+vates   trancrip+onal   regula+on   of   nuclear  target  genes  related  to  fibrosis  

•  Notch  promotes  fibroblasts  prolifera+on  and  fibrosis  (Kavian,  2014)  

•  No  data  evaluates  ADAM17/Notch  signaling  pathway  in  endometriosis  

•  Hyperac+va+on   of   ADAM/Notch   in   other  immunological  diseases  (Kavian,  2010)  

Objec+ves    

Methods  

•  202   women,   younger   than   42   years-­‐old,   excluding  cancer  

 •  Laparoscopy  for  gynaecological  reasons  

•  Endometriosis  rAFS  classifica+on  

 

•  Endometriosis  3  phenotypes:    –  Superficial  (SUP)  –  Endometrioma  (OMA)  

–  Deep  infiltra+ng  endometriosis  (DIE)  

 

Methods  

•  Peritoneal  fluid  was  obtained  (n=  202)  

•  Stromal  endometrial  cells  collec+on  and  culture:  –  Controls  (n=8):  endometrial  biopsy  (Cs)  

–  DIE  pa+ents  (n=8):  endometrial  biopsy  (Es)  +  DIE  biopsy  (Ps)  

Methods  

•  Advanced   Oxida+on   Protein   Products   –AOPP-­‐    measurement  in  PF  (Witko-­‐Sarsat,  1998)  

•  ADAM17  metalloprotease   ac+vity   in   PF   (ELISA)   and  cultured  stromal  endometrial  cells  (Cs,  Es,  Ps)  (WB)  

•  Notch  ac+va+on  (Notch  intracellular  domains  -­‐NICD-­‐)  in  Cs,  Es  and  Ps  (WB)  

•  Fibroblasts  ac+va+on  (α-­‐SMA  and  type-­‐I  collagen)  in  Cs,  Es  and  Ps  with/without  DAPT  (WB)    

Patient characteristics! Endometriosis (N=121) Controls (N=81)

P!Age (years) a 30.8 ± 5.1! 31.7± 5.36! 0.267t!Height (cm) a 167.5 ± 6.1! 164.1 ± 6.0! <0.001t!Weight (kg) a 59.5 ± 8.1! 61.5 ± 9.9! 0.162t!BMI (kg/m2) a 21.2 ± 2.5! 22.8 ± 3.4! 0.001t!Parity a 0.2 ± 0.5! 0.4 ± 0.7! 0.093t!Gravidity a 0.4 ± 0.7! 0.6 ± 1.0! 0.123t! rAFS Classification:!

Mean implants score rAFS a, d 11.3 ± 11.2! NA! !Mean adhesions score rAFS a, d 9.6 ± 16.3! NA!Mean total score rAFS a, d 21.2 ± 23.1! NA!rAFS stage (n, %): d

!

NA!

I

37( 30.6%)

II

16 (13.2%)

III

26 (21.5%)

IV 42 (34.7%)

Surgical classification: !Superficial endometriosis (n, %) 41 (33.9%)! NA! !Endometrioma (n,%) 32 (26.4%)! NA!

Endometrioma size (cm): a

!

!

Right

4.9 ± 2.8

NA

Left 4.8 ± 3.1

Endometrioma laterality (n, %): !

NA !

Bilateral

7/32 (21.9%)

Right

11/32 (34.4%)

Left 14/32 (43.7%)

DIE lesions (n, %) e 48 (39.7%)! NA! Mean number of DIE lesions a 2.3 ± 1.5! NA!

Total number of DIE lesions (n, %):

!

NA!1

13/48 (27.1%)

2

11/48 (22.9%)

≥3 24/48 (50.0%)

Anatomical distribution of DIE (n, %): e, b

!USL

35/48 (72.9%)

NA

Vagina

15/48 (31.2%)

Bladder

7/48 (14.6%)

Intestine

23/48 (47.9%)

Ureter 2/48 (4.2%)

Results  

Patient characteristics! Endometriosis (N=121) Controls (N=81)

P!Age (years) a 30.8 ± 5.1! 31.7± 5.36! 0.267t!Height (cm) a 167.5 ± 6.1! 164.1 ± 6.0! <0.001t!Weight (kg) a 59.5 ± 8.1! 61.5 ± 9.9! 0.162t!BMI (kg/m2) a 21.2 ± 2.5! 22.8 ± 3.4! 0.001t!Parity a 0.2 ± 0.5! 0.4 ± 0.7! 0.093t!Gravidity a 0.4 ± 0.7! 0.6 ± 1.0! 0.123t! rAFS Classification:!

Mean implants score rAFS a, d 11.3 ± 11.2! NA! !Mean adhesions score rAFS a, d 9.6 ± 16.3! NA!Mean total score rAFS a, d 21.2 ± 23.1! NA!rAFS stage (n, %): d

!

NA!

I

37( 30.6%)

II

16 (13.2%)

III

26 (21.5%)

IV 42 (34.7%)

Surgical classification: !Superficial endometriosis (n, %) 41 (33.9%)! NA! !Endometrioma (n,%) 32 (26.4%)! NA!

Endometrioma size (cm): a

!

!

Right

4.9 ± 2.8

NA

Left 4.8 ± 3.1

Endometrioma laterality (n, %): !

NA !

Bilateral

7/32 (21.9%)

Right

11/32 (34.4%)

Left 14/32 (43.7%)

DIE lesions (n, %) e 48 (39.7%)! NA! Mean number of DIE lesions a 2.3 ± 1.5! NA!

Total number of DIE lesions (n, %):

!

NA!1

13/48 (27.1%)

2

11/48 (22.9%)

≥3 24/48 (50.0%)

Anatomical distribution of DIE (n, %): e, b

!USL

35/48 (72.9%)

NA

Vagina

15/48 (31.2%)

Bladder

7/48 (14.6%)

Intestine

23/48 (47.9%)

Ureter 2/48 (4.2%)

Results  

Results  

•  AOPP   levels   and   ADAM17   ac+vity   are   increased   in  endometriosis  PF  

Results  

•  AOPP   levels   and   ADAM17   ac+vity   in   PF   present   a  posi+ve  correla+on  

Results  

•  ADAM17  ac+vity  is  up-­‐regulated  in  PF  of  DIE  pa+ents  

Results  

•  ADAM17   ac+vity   and   Notch   are   up-­‐regulated   in   Es  and  Ps  with  respect  to  Cs  

Results  

•  Increased   Notch   ac+vity   in   endometriosis   pa+ents  leads  to  a  major  ac+va+on  of  fibroblasts    

Results  

•  The   use   of   DAPT   to   prevent   NICD   release,   reduces  fibrosis  markers  in  Ps  cells,  but  not  in  Cs  cells    

Conclusions  

•  AOPP   and   ADAM17   increase   and   correlaYon   in  endometriosis    

•  ADAM17  up-­‐regulated  in  DIE  

•  ADAM17   and   Notch   are   hyperacYvated   in   stromal  endometrial   cells   from   DIE   compared   to   control  endometrial  cells  

Conclusions  

•  Increased  fibrosis  in  endometrial  cells  from  DIE  

•  Notch   inhibi+on   diminishes   fibrosis   only   in  endometrial   cells   from  DIE  pa+ents,  but  not  control  cells  

•  ADAM17/Notch   signaling   pathway   is   up-­‐regulated  leading  to  major  fibrosis  in  endometriosis  

[email protected]  

*This  work  was  supported  by  grants  from  University  Paris  Descartes,  INSERM  and  Fundación  Alfonso  Maran  Escudero.    

Thank  you  for  your  a@enYon  

ADAM-­‐17  

Notch  complex  

Nuclear  transloca+on  

Transcrip+onal  ac+va+on  

FIBROSIS          

ROS  

Metalloproteinase  ADAM-­‐17  cleavage  

NICD  γ-­‐Secretase  complex  

ROS   ADAM-­‐17  

Notch  complex  

NICD  γ-­‐Secretase  complex  

Nuclear  transloca+on  

NICD   Transcrip+onal  ac+va+on  

FIBROSIS          

Endometrial  cells  

NKG2D  ligands  cleavage  

Soluble  NKG2D  ligands  

Metalloproteinase  ADAM-­‐17  cleavage  

NK  cell  inhibi+on