Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of...

13
Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus Andreas Kagermeier Trier University, Germany Session: Challenges for Destination Governance Approaches in the Era of Post-Fordism at the AAG Annual Meeting, March 29 - April 2, 2016, San Francisco From Fordist to post-Fordist production schemes Fordist period: marked by standardised products created efficiently in large quantities (Economies of Scale) Tourism offer in the second half of the 20 th century focused on low- cost standardised products monopolistic structures a small number of tour operators dominating integrated trusts (including transportation and accommodation) Mediterranean: greatest global concentration of tourism activities generating around a quarter of global revenue from tourism => prototype of Fordist production scheme Standardised hotels along the coastline for uniform beach tourism dominated the development in the last decades of the 20 th century Beach tourism a simple and standardised product Individual stakeholders were able to deliver the whole product along the touristic service chain (distribution, transport, accommodation, restaurant and activities) Cooperation in Mediterranean beach tourism was generally limited Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 2 Tourism CY Findings Conclusion Introduction

Transcript of Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of...

Page 1: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership

elements: the case of Cyprus

Andreas KagermeierTrier University, Germany

Session: Challenges for Destination Governance Approaches in the Era of Post-Fordism

at the AAG Annual Meeting,

March 29 - April 2, 2016, San Francisco

From Fordist to post-Fordist production schemes

• Fordist period: marked by standardised products created efficiently in large quantities (Economies of Scale)

• Tourism offer in the second half of the 20th century focused on low-cost standardised products

– monopolistic structures a small number of tour operators dominating

– integrated trusts (including transportation and accommodation)

• Mediterranean: greatest global concentration of tourism activities generating around a quarter of global revenue from tourism=> prototype of Fordist production scheme

– Standardised hotels along the coastline for uniform beach tourism dominated the development in the last decades of the 20th century

– Beach tourism a simple and standardised product

– Individual stakeholders were able to deliver the whole product along the touristic service chain (distribution, transport, accommodation, restaurant and activities)

– Cooperation in Mediterranean beach tourism was generally limited

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 2

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Page 2: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

From Fordist to post-Fordist production schemes

• Role of destination marketing organisations (DMOs) was usually rather limited.

– promoting the respective destination with a superficial image.

– not involved in the operational business

– strategic functions were limited

governance requirements were limited

• Late 20th century: post-Fordism as production and consumption scheme gaining importance• production more flexible

• importance of interaction plays a larger role . “economies of scope”

• networks play a much larger role

• Differentiated consumption patterns as main motive for the change from Fordist to post-Fordist production schemes => broader, more individualised range of products and services

• Internet facilitating commercialisation of products from the Long Tail

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 3

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

From Fordist to post-Fordist production schemes

• New lifestyle groups demand differentiated products (such as wellness, cycling, hiking, nature-based offers)

• Customer segmentation and products for smaller target groups in search of specific experiences became much more important.

• Today, customers are often actively involved in the production of their “flow” experiences increasingly changing their role from traditional consumers to active “prosumers”

• Linking post-Fordism and post-modernity

• The post-modern tourist seeks authentic experiences

• Hybrid forms of vacation with merged elements of cultural, sport or wellness tourism (often rounded off by culinary arts)

• Production side: different stakeholders have to be involved

• Interaction and cooperation are increasingly becoming the key factor

• Role of DMOs is changing significantly (moderators and mediators in the product development process)

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 4

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Page 3: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

Typology of Governance-Structures

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 5

Source: Own design following FLAGESTAD & HOPE 2001, p. 452

Ski corporation

COMMUNITY MODEL

CORPORATE MODEL

Independent operator

Local Tourist Board

Local government

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Typology of Governance-Structures

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 6

Source: Own design following HALL 2011, p. 443 and BODEGA et al. 2004,p. 17

Non-hierarchical

Hierarchical

Private actorsPublic actors

HIERARCHIES

COMMUNITIESNETWORKS

MARKETS

ACTORS

STEE

RIN

G M

OD

E

Steering Mode and Actors(HALL)

Low

High

HighLow

ConstellationModel

GovernedModel

CommunityModel

CorporativeModel

CENTRALIZATION

DEN

SIT

Y

Centralisation and Density of interaction(BODEGA, CIOCCARELLI & DENICOLAI)

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Page 4: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

Typology of Governance-Structures

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 7

Source: Own design

Non-hierarchical

Hierarchical

PrivatePublic

Stakeholders

Ste

erin

g m

ode

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Cyprus in the stagnation phase of its beach tourism life cycle

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 8

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

Source: Own design using data from www.mof.gov.cy 2016

Arrivals of tourist in the Republic of Cyprus from 1980 to 2015

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Page 5: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

Stagnation of Fordist product

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 9

Source: authors own photos

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Strategic Plan for Tourism 2000-2010

• Should mark a turnaround of this Fordist top-down approach

• Part of the repositioning strategy

• Clear orientation towards regional governance approaches was declared:

“Within the framework of Cyprus repositioning strategy each region will be called upon to prepare its own Regional Strategy. Each region will have its own vision regarding its tourist growth and will focus on developing the right product to fit the needs of market segments it will choose to target” (CTO, 2000, p. 7).

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 10

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Page 6: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

Cyprus tourism map

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 11

Source: Author’s design based on: www.mapsfordesign.com

Nicosia

Limassol

AgiaNapa

Morphou

U. K. SovereignBase Area

U. K. SovereignBase Area

United NationsBuffer Zone

United NationsBuffer Zone

Paphos

Polis

Akrotiri

PAPHOS

LIMASSOL

LARNACA

KYRENIA

Mediterranean Sea

Mediterranean Sea

NICOSIA

FAMAGUSTA

Kyrenla

Paralimni

Famagusta

Larnaca

0 10 20 km

TroodosGebirge

r

r

r Mesaoria

9

9

9

9

9

Salamis

Choirokoitia

Kourion

St. HillarionBuffavento

Kantara

Varosha

__

_ _

_

_

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Rural … cultural … natural … tourism

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 12

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Source: authors own photos

Page 7: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

Cyprus in the stagnation phase of its beach tourism life cycle

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 13

Source: Own design using data from www.mof.gov.cy 2016

Overnight stays in different regional destinations

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Mio

. Ove

rnig

ht s

tays

Troodos

Nicosia

Paphos

Limassol

Larnaka

Agia Napa/Paralimni

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Cyprus tourism map

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 14

Source: Author’s design based on: www.mapsfordesign.com

Nicosia

Limassol

AgiaNapa

Morphou

U. K. SovereignBase Area

U. K. SovereignBase Area

United NationsBuffer Zone

United NationsBuffer Zone

Paphos

Polis

Akrotiri

PAPHOS

LIMASSOL

LARNACA

KYRENIA

Mediterranean Sea

Mediterranean Sea

NICOSIA

FAMAGUSTA

Kyrenla

Paralimni

Famagusta

Larnaca

0 10 20 km

TroodosGebirge

r

r

r Mesaoria

9

9

9

9

9

Salamis

Choirokoitia

Kourion

St. HillarionBuffavento

Kantara

Varosha

__

_ _

_

_

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Page 8: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

Identification of the core constraints

• Delimitations of regional destinations perpetuating the dependency of the hinterland

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 15

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Wine Routes

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 16

Source: CTO 2008

Page 9: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

CSTI: Discover the real Cyprus (Village routes)

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 17

Source: csti-cyprus.org 2008

1. Limassol District2. Larnaka (Orini) District3. Famagusta District (Red Earth

and Windmills)4. Troodos Green Heart of Cyprus5. Pitsilia6. North Pafos and Akamas

Identification of the core constraints

• Delimitations of regional destinations perpetuating the dependency of the hinterland

• Incomplete, partial decentralisation

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 18

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Page 10: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

Incomplete, partial decentralisation

• Six regional boards initiated by the CTO since 2002

• Regional strategy studies commissioned (financed) by the CTO

• No substantial own funding for the regional tourism boards

• About 10,000 € for material expenses from the CTO

• Regional tourism brochures still published by the CTO

• Local tourist information offices still run by the CTO

=> Perpetuation of the centralised approach

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 19

Source: CTO

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Identification of the core constraints

• Delimitations of regional destinations perpetuating the dependency of the hinterland

• Incomplete, partial decentralisation

• Dominance of SMEs in the hinterland with low level of professionalism

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 20

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Page 11: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

Dominance of SMEs in the hinterland with low level of professionalism

• Most of the stakeholders who run the tavernas, guest houses, craft-shops and activity-oriented agencies hold small-scale, family-run enterprises that sometimes lack the competencies (Peters, 2005) required for providing sophisticated post-Fordist products.

• The regional core competencies (Pechlaner et al., 2006b) have only been developed to a small extent.

• Regarding stakeholders’ strategic orientations, most can be described as “defenders” and “reactors”.

• Avci et al. (2011) consider these types of stakeholder to be typical of developing countries.

• Occupancy rates of about 15 per cent (Kaufmann et al., 2012, p. 269) = weak performance of rural tourism accommodation facilities

• Booking platform by the CTO, but without any further option for activities (www.agrotourism.com.cy)

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 21

Source: CTO

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Identification of the core constraints

• Delimitations of regional destinations perpetuating the dependency of the hinterland

• Incomplete, partial decentralisation

• Dominance of SMEs in the hinterland with low level of professionalism

• Isolated actions by potential leaders

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 22

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Page 12: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

The role of potential leaders

• Regional tourism boards only partially assume the role

of leaders

• SMTE incapable of organising themselves

• Can “prospectors” and “analysers” (Avci et al., 2011) be

identified which could play a crucial role as innovation

motors ?

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 23

Source: CTO

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Innovative stakeholders as possible leaders?

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 24

Cyprus Villages at Tochni (www.cyprusvillages.com.cy)

Source: authors own photos

Ayii Anargyri Hotel in Miliou (www.aasparesort.com)

Library-Hotel in Kalavassos

(libraryhotelcyprus.com)

Page 13: Dynamisation of governance approaches in destination management by leadership elements: the case of Cyprus

The role of potential leaders

Expert interviews with the owners or managers of these enterprises

• They do not cooperate with the regional tourism bodies.

• Explicitly distance themselves from regional tourism development activities and develop their products independently.

• Rely on their own ability to promote their products.

• Succeeded in developing a niche in the tourism market

• Do not want their USP to be disseminated throughout the region

• Organisational distance from regional and national structures is explained by the structural deficits and weak consideration of (post-Fordist) products

• See no advantage in cooperating as long as the structural conditions remain the same.

• Lack of potential win-win situations is the main reason why they act independently

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 25

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction

Conclusion

Andreas Kagermeier AAG 2016 (SFO): Destination Governance Cyprus 29 March – 2 April 2016, Slide 26

• Top-down approach applied by the responsible public body at the national level is only partly facilitating the development of self-organised regional structures

• Dominant private stakeholders – representing the traditional sun-and-sea segment – not willing or capable of assuming a leadership role in the reorientation process

• Providers of new innovative products are often too small and poorly organised to achieve competitive product quality and to gain market access

• Innovative stakeholders who have the capacity to invest in new products independently and to gain market access are acting in an isolated fashion.

• So they fail to act as innovative entrepreneurs who could lead the destination’s restructuring process.

• Leadership approaches do not develop by themselves.

• If DMOs are unable to assume the leadership role on their own, requiring masterminds from the private sector to implement leadership-based strategies, adequate destination management structures are an indispensable precondition.

Tourism CY Findings ConclusionIntroduction