Dynamical Response to the 11-Year Solar Cycle (and the QBO) in the Middle Atmosphere
description
Transcript of Dynamical Response to the 11-Year Solar Cycle (and the QBO) in the Middle Atmosphere
Dynamical Response to the 11-Year Solar Cycle (and the QBO)
in the Middle Atmosphere
Marie Curie Outgoing International Fellowship
ISSI International Team MeetingBern, SwitzerlandApril 20, 2006
Katja Matthes 1,2
1 Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Meteorologie, Berlin, Germany
2 National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Courtesy of Kuni Kodera (2005)
Sun
UV
Earth
Ozone T, U
Indirect Influence
Dynamical impact
trop.
Strat.
Visible
Earth
Direct Influence
Radiative impact
trop.
Strat.
Sun
?
Possible Ways for Solar Influence on Climate
Mechanism – Influence of the 11-Year Solar Cycle
Mesosphere
Change of meridionaltemperature gradient
Circulation changes(wind, waves, meridional
BD circulation)
UV radiation
StratosphereKodera and Kuroda
(2002)
Troposphere
Direct influence on temperature
Influence on ozone
QBO
SAO
Gray et al. (2001a,b)Gray et al. (2003, 2004)
Labitzke (1987), Labitzke and van Loon (1988)
Tropopause
Stratopause
Indirect influence, difficult to measure
ModelingMatthes et al.
(2004)
Ocean?
Thermosphere
??
?
Change of Hadley cell
Change of Walker circulation
Tropical responseLabitzke and van Loon (1988), Kodera (2004), Gleisner and Thejll (2003), Haigh (2003), Haigh et al. (2005), van Loon et al. (2004, 2006),
Matthes et al. (2006a)
NH polar responseKodera (2002, 2003), Ogi et al. (2004), Kuroda and Kodera (2004, 2006) SHMatthes et al.
(2006a)
Some Observational Facts
Positive Correlations Sun - Stratospheric Parameters
Labitzke (1999)
60N60S
NCEP/CPC (1980-1997)48 km
16 km60N60S
SSU/MSU4 (1979-1997)
Observed Solar Signal in TemperatureAnnual Mean
Scaife et al.
(2002)
Hood
(2004)
+2.5 K
+0.8 K
+0.25 K
SSU/MSU4 (1979-2003)
+ 0.9 K
Crooks & Gray
(2005)
ERA40 (1979-2001)
60S 60N
48 km
16 km
+ 1.75K
+ 0.5K
-1 K
+1 K
Courtesy of W. Randel (2005)
Calisesi and Matthes (2006)updated from Shindell et al. (1999)
Observed Solar Signal in OzoneAnnual Mean
Models vs. Observations - Tropics
Lee and Smith (2003)
SBUV (1979-1989)
SAGE (1984-1998)
16km
50km
21km
50km
60N60S
Observed Modulation of Polar Night Jet and Brewer-Dobson Circulation
1000Eq
‒ f v*∼ •F∇
AnomaliesEarly Winter
Kodera and Kuroda (2002)?
Confirmation of modulationduring NH winter and tropospheric influence with FUB-CMAM(Matthes et al., 2004, 2006a)
2-D chemical transport model studies
(Garcia et al., 1984; Brasseur, 1993; Huang
and Brasseur, 1993; Haigh, 1994; Fleming
et al., 1995)
GCM studies without realistic radiation and
ozone changes (e.g., Wetherald and Manabe, 1975; Balachandran and Rind,
1995; Balachandran et al., 1999; Kodera et al., 1991)
GCM studies with realistic radiation and
ozone changeswithout QBO
(Haigh, 1999; Larkin et al., 2000, Shindell et al., 1999,
2001; Rind et al., 2002; Matthes et al., 2003)
GCM studies with realistic radiation and
ozone changesand with QBO
(Matthes et al., 2004, 2006a; Palmer and Gray, 2005)
Development of Modeling Solar Influence on MA
Studies with Chemistry Climate ModelsIntercomparison within SOLARIS (Solar Influence for SPARC)
(Tourpalie et al., 2003, 2005; Rozanov et al., 2004; Egorova et al., 2005; Langematz et al., 2005; Schmidt and Brasseur, 2006; Marsh et al.,
2006; Matthes et al., 2006b)
Experimental Design
Perpetual Solar Maximum
Perpetual Solar Minimum
15 years
5-8 %
Data from Lean et al. (1997)
Irradiance changes max-min (%)
Data from Haigh (1994)
Ozone changes (%) Annual Mean
Solar cycle ozone variation
IC GISS
annual mean ozone (%)
3 10
850
0.01
100
0.1
1
60N30S 30N90S 90N060S
10
850
0.01
100
0.1
1
60N30S 30N90S 90N060SLatitude Latitude
Data from Shindell et al. (1999)
+3 %+3 %
+2.5 %
Low latitudes: good agreement in stratospheric temperature signal
High latitudes: dynamical signal very different
Annual MeanT (max-min) (K)
Matthes et al. (2003), Kodera et al. (2003)
Main result: improvement of model climatology = pre-requisite for realistic solar signal
GRIPS (GCM Reality Intercomparison Project for SPARC) Solar Intercomparison
Model Description FUB-CMAM
• Freie Universität Berlin Climate Middle Atmosphere Model (FUB-CMAM) (Langematz and Pawson, 1997; Pawson et al., 1998, Langematz et al., 2003, Matthes et al., 2004)
– T21L34 (5,6 x 5,6 ), top: 80km (mesosphere)– Ozone climatology– Based on ECHAM model family
No self-consistent QBO
=> Relaxation of the zonal mean wind in the model toward rocketsonde data from Gray et al. (2001)
Gray et al. (2004)
FUB-CMAM vs. Observations (Max-Min) – NH Winter
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
NCEP/CPC (1979-1998)ERA40 (1979-2001)
0.4
850
0.1
hPa
Matthes et al. (2004)
FUB-CMAM
0
80
km1000
„poleward-downward“ movement
modulation of the PNJ at high lats
stratospheric
response
tropospheric
response
update of Kodera (1995)
comparable with observations (e.g., Kodera, 1995)
Modulation of the Brewer-Dobson Circulation Correlations: - Vertical Component of EPF (60N/10 hPa)
in December and January Temperature
less wave forcing at high lats lower temperatures at high lats & higher temperatures at low lats => weaker BDC
Absolut (Min)
Matthes et al. (2006a)
Impact on Tropospheric Circulation Pattern
Kodera, in preparation (2006)
Jo Haigh will talk about stratosphere-troposphere coupling
QBO East warm, disturbed polar vortex
QBO West cold, undisturbed polar vortex
Holton and Tan (1980, 1982)
Solar Minimum Solar Maximum
warm, disturbed polar vortex
cold, undisturbed polar vortex
Labitzke (1987), Labitzke and van Loon (1988)
Observations: QBO-Solar Signal
• Importance of upper stratospheric winds on NH winter evolution: Gray et al. (2001a,b), Gray et al. (2003), observations and mechanistic model study, Gray et al. (2004), Palmer and Gray (2005), Pascoe et al. (2006) GCM study• Observed 11-year solar cycle in QBO itself: Salby and Callaghan (2000, 2006), Soukharev and Hood (2001), QBOw longer during solar max• QBO modulation confirmed with 2D model (McCormack, 2003) and GCM (Palmer and Gray, 2005)
QBO-Sun Interaction in the FUB-CMAM
10hPa north pole temperature +/-2σ
QBO east warmer confirms observations from Labitzke und van Loon as well as Gray et al.! also confirmed with Unified Model with self-consistent QBO (Palmer and Gray, 2005)
W
E
Solar Minimum
QBO west warmer
Solar Maximum°C
Matthes et al. (2004)
Model Description UKMO Stratosphere-Mesosphere Model
(SMM)• UKMO Mechanistic primitive-equation model of the middle atmosphere (SMM); Midrad radiation scheme, Rayleigh friction
• 100-0.01 hPa (16-80 km)• 5° x 5° x 2 km• constant amplitude wavenumber 1 forcing at lower boundary
• initial conditions = August• perpetual January conditions• experiments = 300 day long• 20-ensembles in each experiment
Courtesy of Lesley Gray (2005)
Polar Temperature at 24 km
Experiment A: Varying the Bottom Boundary
Experiment B: Varying the Equatorial Winds
TimePolar
Temperature
100 m 150 m
200 m 250 m
300 m 350 m
+40 ms-1 +20 ms-1
0 ms-1 -20 ms-1
-40 ms-1
Identical
Changing the
tropospheric
forcing or the
equatorial winds
alters the
timing of the
warmings
Courtesy of Lesley Gray (2005)
Easterly anomaly imposed in subtropics at 40-50km to mimic a solar minimum anomaly
Stratosphere Mesosphere Model exptTime-series of polar temperature
20-member ensemble
Timing of sudden warmings is very
variable in control runCourtesy of Lesley Gray (2005)
Variance of NP temperature at 24 km in UKMO GCM exp.
control
SAO + deep QBO
SAO-only
Pascoe, Gray and Scaife, 2006 (GRL)
Courtesy of Lesley Gray (2005)
Model Description NCAR-WACCM
• NCAR Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (NCAR-WACCM) (Collins et al., 2004; Sassi et al., 2005)
– 4 x 5 L66, top: 140km (thermosphere)– Interactive chemistry– Based on NCAR Community Climate Model family
No self-consistent QBORelaxation of the zonal mean wind in the model toward rocketsonde data from Gray et al. (2001) Very similar experiments as with the FUB-CMAM, perpetual solar and QBO simulations
Matthes et al. (2006b), to be submitted
WACCM Annual Mean Results - Differences
Ozone and Temperature (Max-Min): QBO East experiments
99% 95% significant
Maxima in temperature and ozone comparable to observations
+0.75K+3% +2.5%
Temperature (K) Ozone (%)
relative minimum in the middle stratosphere
+0.2K +1%
secondary maximum in the lower stratosphere
+0.5K +3%
Comparison NH Winter Response
WACCM versus FUB-CMAMDifference
•WACCM: ozone calculated interactively•FUB-CMAM: ozone prescribed
Zonal Mean Wind Differences - Models vs. Observations
ObservationsNCEP-CPC (1979-1998)FUB-CMAM
Nov
Dec
Jan
WACCM 1.9x2.5WACCM 4x5
Matthes et al. (2006b)
Matthes et al. (2004)
WACCM NH Winter Signal - Lower Stratosphere and
Troposphere
Dec T max-min (K)
Jan T max-min (K)
Eq 30N 60N30S60S
Jan omega min (hPa/s)
Jan omega max-min (hPa/s)
Eq 30N 60N30S60S
+1K
confirms recent observational study about influence on Hadley and Walker circulation from van Loon et al. (2006)!
WACCM NH Summer Signal - Lower Stratosphere and
Troposphere
May T max-min (K)
Jun T max-min (K)
Eq 30N 60N30S60S
Jun omega min (hPa/s)
Jun omega max-min (hPa/s)
Eq 30N 60N30S60S
first model results that confirm observational study about influence on Hadley and Walker circulation from e.g., van Loon et al. (2004), Kodera(2004)
+0.5K
4˚x 5˚SMIN
1.9˚x 2.5˚SMIN
Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar MayJul Sep Nov Jan Mar May
T90N @ 10hPa U60N @ 10hPa
Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar MayJul Sep Nov Jan Mar May
WACCM - Impact of Different Horizontal Resolution
more SSWs!
Summary• Direct 11-year solar signal in the upper stratosphere
leads to modulation of PNJ and BDC that induce indirect circulation changes in the lower stratosphere (Matthes et al., 2004) and down to the troposphere at polar and equatorial latitudes (Matthes et al., 2006a)• Solar cycle and QBO both have anomalies in the subtropical upper stratosphere that can reinforce each other and determine the timing of stratospheric sudden warmings - a frequency modulation (Gray et al., 2003, 2004; Matthes et al., 2004; Salby and Callaghan, 2006)• Results obtained with the FUB-CMAM are confirmed with more complex interactive WACCM model (Matthes et al., 2006b)
• WACCM shows for the first time lower stratospheric temperature signal in Dec/Jan and during summer (modulation of the BDC)!• Prescribed QBO in FUB-CMAM and WACCM is necessary for a more realistic solar signal
• vertical structure of temperature and ozone signal captured for the first time in CCM (WACCM)
• finer horizontal resolution represents interannual variability better and is needed for better wave-mean flow interactions
Outlook
• 110-years time varying solar cycle with and without time varying QBO • intercomparison of recent solar experiments with CCMs within SOLARIS (SPARC initiative)• intercomparison of prescribed versus self- consistent QBO
Thank you to Karin Labitzke Ulrich Cubasch
Ulrike Langematz (FU Berlin) Kunihiko Kodera
Yuhji Kuroda (MRI, Japan) Lesley Gray (Reading University, UK)
WACCM group (Byron Boville, Rolando Garcia, Fabrizio Sassi, Dan Marsh, Doug Kinnison, Stacy Walters)
(NCAR, USA) Anne Smith (NCAR, USA)